DOCSLIB.ORG

Lower Canada/Canada East/ Quebec: Factors Leading To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lower Canada/Canada East/ Quebec: Factors Leading To Lower Canada/Canada East/ Quebec: financial woes. In 1860, the government had to confrontation with the United States. In the mid- Factors Leading to Confederation borrow more money to buy out the Grand Trunk 1860s, Great Britain encouraged negotiations to Railway Company's debts. In 1860, Canadian debt transfer these territories to the new country that Political Factors reached $50 million. The Reciprocity Treaty with would become Canada. When Confederation the United States was about to expire and Canada came into effect in 1867, the Hudson's Bay By the early 1860s, Great Britain was gradually had no choice but to turn to the markets of the Company began the transfer of the North- losing interest in its North American colonies, British Atlantic colonies. When the Reciprocity Western Territory and Rupert's Land to the new which were seen to be an economic, military and Treaty came to an end in 1866, fewer markets Dominion of Canada. political burden. With this detachment came a were available to Canada. A union of the British desire to reorganize the colonies' political colonies in North America would open up new Finally, Great Britain also feared that Fenians structure by giving them greater autonomy. The markets. might attack its North American colonies. political system of United Canada had been extremely unstable since the mid-1850s. Security Factors Factors Related to the Railway Government crises occurred every year from 1854 In the mid-19th century, Great Britain wanted, for to 1857, and twice a year in 1858, as well as from Great Britain was no longer interested in financing strategic reasons, to connect its North American 1862 to 1864. Once in power, the Great Coalition the defence of its North American colonies and colonies by means of a railway. Given the project's of John A. Macdonald, George-Étienne Cartier and asked that United Canada assume the scope, no single colony could provide the George Brown planned a legislative union of the responsibility for its own defence. In 1862, as a necessary financial resources. A political union British North American colonies. The debate show of goodwill, the Macdonald-Cartier would allow the colonies to pool their resources surrounding the issue of representation by government proposed a bill allocating $1 million and make the railway project more feasible. population (rep by pop) also called for a political to maintain a militia of 50,000 men. The bill was defeated in the House, disappointing the British reorganization. The Process authorities. From then on, they would be Economic Factors receptive to any project to unite the North In 1858, after George-Étienne Cartier and American colonies, which would solve the Alexander Tilloch Galt reached an agreement, the The success of railway companies, particularly that problem of North American defence. former announced a government project in these of the Grand Trunk Railway Company, was crucial terms: to the economic health of United Canada. In 1855, When the American Civil War ended, Great Britain skyrocketing construction costs forced the worried about the victors' reaction to British "Le gouvernement étudiera l'opportunité d'une government to begin massive investment in the support of the Southern cause. Britain's union fédérale des provinces britanniques de Grand Trunk Railway Company in order to save withdrawal from North America might normalize l'Amérique du Nord, et se mettra en the project. This commitment spelled financial relations between Canada and the United States. communication à ce sujet avec le gouvernement ruin for the government, which would soon be impérial et avec les provinces Maritimes. Le The perceived "threat" posed by expanding unable to pay interest on its debt. It became clear résultat de ces communications sera soumis au American interests increased when the United that railway profits would never materialize. The Parlement à sa prochaine session."1 government of United Canada was forced to States purchased Alaska. Great Britain believed increase import tariffs, its main source of revenue. that the uncertain status of the North-Western [translation] But these hikes could not solve the colony's Territory and Rupert's Land might lead to "The government shall study the timeliness of a federal union of British North American provinces, resolve the political crisis once and for all, and North American colonies. The union could include and will contact the imperial government and agreed to co-operate with any government that only Canada East and Canada West, or the Maritime provinces in this regard. The result of accepted constitutional reform.2 Maritime colonies as well. Having heard of the these communications will be presented to John A. Macdonald, who did not like George discussions of underway among the three Parliament next session." Brown at first, made an overture to him. Brown Maritime colonies, the Parliament of United replied that he would join a Conservative majority Canada contacted the various colonial This project was essentially that of Alexander government if it agreed to include federation as governments. All agreed to meet in Charlottetown Tilloch Galt. It arose from an ideological debate part of its platform.3 This government, called the in September 1864 to discuss a possible union. begun by some members of the Canadian political Great Coalition, included several politicians who elite, Francophone and Anglophone, when the favoured a union of British colonies, including The Parliament of United Canada obtained Canadas were united in 1840. In 1858, many of Alexander Tilloch Galt, George-Étienne Cartier, permission to send seven of its members. For the main players in the Confederation conferences Hector-Louis Langevin, Étienne-Paschal Taché, Canada West, the representatives were of 1864 to 1867 were already on the scene, Thomas D'Arcy McGee and Jean-Charles Chapais. John A. Macdonald, George Brown and William including George Brown, George-Étienne Cartier, It was this overture to George Brown that set the McDougall; for Canada East, they were George- John A. Macdonald, Alexander Tilloch Galt, wheels of the Confederation project in motion. Étienne Cartier, Alexander-Tilloch Galt, Hector- Joseph-Charles Taché, Antoine-Aimé Dorion, The overture was also remarkable in that political Louis Langevin and Thomas D'Arcy McGee. Étienne-Paschal Taché, Hector-Louis Langevin and foes joined forces to support a common goal. This The United Canada delegates explained their plan Thomas D'Arcy McGee. Others, like Joseph- goal was hard to define, however, since not for a union of British North American colonies. Édouard Cauchon, exerted a more subtle everyone had the same definition of They did so with such conviction that the influence. Though only a member of Parliament, Confederation. Alexander Tilloch Galt, for delegates for the Maritime colonies set aside their Cauchon managed to influence public opinion in example, believed the Confederation project initial Maritime union project to concentrate on favour of a political union through his newspaper, should include the Maritime provinces, while the new Canadian federation project. In Le Journal de Québec. George Brown initially viewed it simply as an Charlottetown, they agreed to resume discussions amendment to the union of Canada East and In 1858, George-Étienne Cartier, Alexander Tilloch at a second conference in October 1864, this time Canada West. In the end, all managed to agree. Galt and John Ross travelled to London to present in Québec. Queen Victoria with a federation project for the The Charlottetown Conference British North American colonies. There were Before returning to Canada, the United Canada received with polite indifference. After this For close to ten years, the British Atlantic colonies delegates toured the Maritime colonies, giving refusal, the political class put its project aside for a had considered a union to improve their lot in speeches and drumming up support for their number of years. The frequent changes in colonial North America. By simplifying their project. government also disrupted the process. The administration, reducing expenses, and pooling The Québec Conference federation project resumed in 1864, and this time, their energies and resources, Prince Edward it was brought to a conclusion on July 1, 1867. Island, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia might face The United Canada delegates who attended the the future with serenity. Québec Conference were, for Canada East: In 1864, when the Conservative Taché-Macdonald Étienne-Paschal Taché, George-Étienne Cartier, government was defeated in the House, George As we have seen, the Province of Canada was also Alexander Tilloch Galt, Jean-Charles Chapais, Brown, who held the balance of power, wanted to considering a political reorganization of the British Hector-Louis Langevin, Thomas D'Arcy McGee and, for Canada West: John A. Macdonald, George believed that inclusion of the Maritime colonies John A. Macdonald, William McDougall and Brown, Alexander Campbell, Oliver Mowat, would increase the financial burden on United W. P. Howland; for Canada East: George-Étienne William McDougall and James Cockburn. Canada. Moreover, the Senate, as it was proposed Cartier, Alexander Tilloch Galt and Hector-Louis at the Québec Conference, could impede the will Langevin. The talks were chaired by The Québec Conference was held in the utmost of the people and block adoption of progressive John A. Macdonald, who tried to change the secrecy from October 10 to 26, 1864. When the legislation. Finally, he firmly believed that the wording of the Québec Resolutions several times. general population made it clear that it wanted to Confederation project should be subject to the George-Étienne Cartier and other delegates had to know more about the negotiations that would people's approval by a vote. Antoine-Aimé Dorion temper his zeal. decide their future, the Québec Resolutions were gave a speech to the constituents of the published. These resolutions served as the basis Hochelaga riding and, in 1865, he made a long Once the London Resolutions were drafted, the for the talks leading to Confederation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rupert's Land and North-West Territory Order
    Rupert's Land and North-Western Territory Order (Order of Her Majesty in Council Admitting Rupert's Land and the North-Western Territory into the Union) At the Court at Windsor, the 23rd day of June, 1870 PRESENT, The Queen's Most Excellent Majesty Lord President Lord Privy Seal Lord Chamberlain Mr. Gladstone Whereas by the "Constitution Act, 1867," it was (amongst other things) enacted that it should be lawful for the Queen, by and with the advice or Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council, on Address from the Houses of the Parliament of Canada, to admit Rupert's Land and the North- Western Territory, or either of them, into the Union on such terms and conditions in each case as should be in the Addresses expressed, and as the Queen should think fit to approve, subject to the provisions of the said Act. And it was further enacted that the provisions of any Order in Council in that behalf should have effect as if they had been enacted by the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland: And whereas by an Address from the Houses of the Parliament of Canada, of which Address a copy is contained in the Schedule to this Order annexed, marked A, Her Majesty was prayed, by and with the advice of Her Most Honourable Privy Council, to unite Rupert's Land and the NorthWestern Territory with the Dominion of Canada, and to grant to the Parliament of Canada authority to legislate for their future welfare and good government upon the terms and conditions therein stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada East Equipment Dealers' Association (CEEDA)
    Industry Update from Canada: Canada East Equipment Dealers' Association (CEEDA) Monday, 6 July 2020 In partnership with Welcome Michael Barton Regional Director, Canada Invest Northern Ireland – Americas For up to date information on Invest Northern Ireland in the Americas, follow us on LinkedIn & Twitter. Invest Northern Ireland – Americas @InvestNI_USA 2 Invest Northern Ireland – Americas: Export Continuity Support in the Face of COVID-19 Industry Interruption For the Canadian Agri-tech sector… Industry Updates Sessions with industry experts to provide Northern Ireland manufacturers with updates on the Americas markets to assist with export planning and preparation Today’s Update We are delighted to welcome Beverly Leavitt, President & CEO of the Canada East Equipment Dealers' Association (CEEDA). CEEDA represents Equipment Dealers in the Province of Ontario, and the Atlantic Provinces in the Canadian Maritimes. 3 Invest Northern Ireland – Americas: Export Continuity Support in the Face of COVID-19 Industry Interruption For the Canadian Agri-tech sector… Virtual Meet-the-Buyer programs designed to provide 1:1 support to connect Northern Ireland manufacturers with potential Canadian equipment dealers Ongoing dealer development in Eastern & Western Canada For new-to-market exporters, provide support, industry information and routes to market For existing exporters, market expansion and exploration of new Provinces 4 Invest Northern Ireland – Americas: Export Continuity Support in the Face of COVID-19 Industry Interruption For the Canadian
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the 121St and of the 122Nd Anniversary of The
    )12 89 f 1 -MmfarByitfh J&mkjMl^LJilLLJii, Jlimili -41H IJItl 4u-iii»- UtiU"! iHilM liiilM jB4jllbilltillllliMHlfjlli-iiittttjlB--lllLi-lllL UlllJll 4JH4Jifr[tti^iBrJltiitfhrM44ftV- 'ilVJUL -Mi 4-M-'tlE4ilti XJ ill JMLUtU ^^ I Memorial = - ()!•' THE iaist jlisto oi^ the: laancl IB MNIVKRSAfiY OF THE ' SEnLERIEUT OF TRUBO BY THE BRITISH BEI^G THE Fl^ST CELiEBRATIOH Op THE TOWN'S NATAL DAY, § SEPTEMBER 13th, 1882. % eiliillintft •] l*«li*««««««»it»««l • • » • » • •••. •• •• » ••• .. ••• ••••• ••••• ••••• ••••• ••• • • •• • • • • • • •• • • • • • COMMITTEE OF PUBLICATION • •••• RICHARD CRAIG-, Esq., Chairman. ISRAEL LONGWORTH, Q. C. F. A. LAURENCE, Q. C. MEMORIAL One Hundred and Twenty-second, and of the One Hundred and Twenty-first, advertised as the One Hundred and Twenty-third OF T^E SEJTLE/I\EflJ Of 51^0, BY THE BRITISH, Being the F^st Celebration of THE TOWN'S MT4L MY, September 13th, 1882. TRURO, N. S. Printed by Doane Bros., 1894. PREFACE The committee in charge of the publication of this pamphlet, in per- forming their duty, exceedingly regret that the delay has rendered it im- possible to furnish the "Guardian's" account of Truro's eventful Natal Day, as well as to give the address delivered by F. A. Ljaurence, Esq., Q. C, on the memorable occasion, published in September or October, 1882, in that newspaper. After much diligent inquiry for the missing num- bers of the "Guardian," by advertisement and otherwise, they are not forthcoming. If not discovered in time for the present publication the committee hope that the matter of a supplementary nature in the form of an appendix, will be found of sufficient historical importance to, in some measure, compensate for that which has been lost.
    [Show full text]
  • From European Contact to Canadian Independence
    From European Contact to Canadian Independence Standards SS6H4 The student will describe the impact of European contact on Canada. a. Describe the influence of the French and the English on the language and religion of Canada. b. Explain how Canada became an independent nation. From European Contact to Quebec’s Independence Movement • The First Nations are the native peoples of Canada. • They came from Asia over 12,000 years ago. • They crossed the Bering Land Bridge that joined Russia to Alaska. • There were 12 tribes that made up the First Nations. • The Inuit are one of the First Nation tribes. • They still live in Canada today. • In 1999, Canada’s government gave the Inuit Nunavut Territory in northeast Canada. • The first explorers to settle Canada were Norse invaders from the Scandinavian Peninsula. • In 1000 CE, they built a town on the northeast coast of Canada and established a trading relationship with the Inuit. • The Norse deserted the settlement for unknown reasons. • Europeans did not return to Canada until almost 500 years later… • The Italian explorer, John Cabot, sailed to Canada’s east coast in 1497. • Cabot claimed an area of land for England (his sponsor) and named it “Newfoundland”. •Jacques Cartier sailed up the St. Lawrence River in 1534. •He claimed the land for France. •French colonists named the area “New France”. • In 1608, Samuel de Champlain built the first permanent French settlement in New France— called Quebec. • The population grew slowly. • Many people moved inland to trap animals. • Hats made of beaver fur were in high demand in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund Morris Among the Saskatchewan Indians and the Fort Qu'appelle Monument
    EDMUND MORRIS AMONG THE SASKATCHEWAN INDIANS AND THE FORT QU'APPELLE MONUMENT By Jean McGill n 1872 the government of Canada appointed Alexander Morris the first Chief Justice of Manitoba. The same year he succeeded A. G. Archibald as Lieu­ I tenant-Governor of Manitoba and the North-West Territories. Archibald had already acted as a commissioner of the federal government in negotiating Treaties Nos. 1 and 2 with the Indians of Manitoba. Morris was com­ missioned in 1873 to carry on negotiations with Indians of the western plains and some Manitoba Indians not present at the first two treaties. By the time Alexander Morris's term of office had expired in 1877 he had negotiated the signing of Treaties No. 3 (North-West Angle), 4 (Fort Qu'Appelle), 5 (Lake Winnipeg), 6 (Forts Carlton and Pitt), and the Revision of Treaties Nos. 1 and 2. Morris later documented the meetings, negotiations, and wording of all of the treaties completed prior to 1900 in a book entitled The Treaties of Canada with the Indians ofManitoba and the North­ west Territories which was published in 1888. He returned to Toronto with his family and later was persuaded to run for office in the Ontario legislature where he represented Toronto for a number of years. Edmund Morris, youngest of a family of eleven, was born two years before the family went to Manitoba. Indian chiefs and headmen in colourful regalia frequently came to call on the Governor and as a child at Government House in Winnipeg, Edmund was exposed to Indian culture for the Indians invariably brought gifts, often for Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • An Indian Chief, an English Tourist, a Doctor, a Reverend, and a Member of Ppparliament: the Journeys of Pasqua’S’S’S Pictographs and the Meaning of Treaty Four
    The Journeys of Pasqua’s Pictographs 109 AN INDIAN CHIEF, AN ENGLISH TOURIST, A DOCTOR, A REVEREND, AND A MEMBER OF PPPARLIAMENT: THE JOURNEYS OF PASQUA’S’S’S PICTOGRAPHS AND THE MEANING OF TREATY FOUR Bob Beal 7204 76 Street Edmonton, Alberta Canada, T6C 2J5 [email protected] Abstract / Résumé Indian treaties of western Canada are contentious among historians, First Nations, governments, and courts. The contemporary written docu- mentation about them has come from one side of the treaty process. Historians add information from such disciplines as First Nations Tradi- tional Knowledge and Oral History to draw as complete a picture as possible. Now, we have an additional source of written contemporary information, Chief Pasqua’s recently rediscovered pictographs showing the nature of Treaty Four and its initial implementation. Pasqua’s ac- count, as contextualized here, adds significantly to our knowledge of the western numbered treaty process. The pictographs give voice to Chief Pasqua’s knowledge. Les traités conclus avec les Indiens de l’Ouest canadien demeurent liti- gieux pour les historiens, les Premières nations, les gouvernements et les tribunaux. Les documents contemporains qui discutent des traités ne proviennent que d’une seule vision du processus des traités. Les historiens ajoutent des renseignements provenant de disciplines telles que les connaissances traditionnelles et l’histoire orale des Autochto- nes. Ils bénéficient désormais d’une nouvelle source écrite contempo- raine, les pictogrammes récemment redécouverts du chef Pasqua, qui illustrent la nature du Traité n° 4 et les débuts de son application. Le compte rendu du chef, tel que replacé dans son contexte, est un ajout important à notre connaissance du processus des traités numérotés dans l’Ouest canadien.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN A. MACDONALD the Indispensable Politician
    JOHN A. MACDONALD The Indispensable Politician by Alastair C.F. Gillespie With a Foreword by the Hon. Peter MacKay Board of Directors CHAIR Brian Flemming Rob Wildeboer International lawyer, writer, and policy advisor, Halifax Executive Chairman, Martinrea International Inc., Robert Fulford Vaughan Former Editor of Saturday Night magazine, columnist VICE CHAIR with the National Post, Ottawa Jacquelyn Thayer Scott Wayne Gudbranson Past President and Professor, CEO, Branham Group Inc., Ottawa Cape Breton University, Sydney Stanley Hartt MANAGING DIRECTOR Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Toronto Brian Lee Crowley, Ottawa Calvin Helin SECRETARY Aboriginal author and entrepreneur, Vancouver Lincoln Caylor Partner, Bennett Jones LLP, Toronto Peter John Nicholson Inaugural President, Council of Canadian Academies, TREASURER Annapolis Royal Martin MacKinnon CFO, Black Bull Resources Inc., Halifax Hon. Jim Peterson Former federal cabinet minister, Counsel at Fasken DIRECTORS Martineau, Toronto Pierre Casgrain Director and Corporate Secretary of Casgrain Maurice B. Tobin & Company Limited, Montreal The Tobin Foundation, Washington DC Erin Chutter Executive Chair, Global Energy Metals Corporation, Vancouver Research Advisory Board Laura Jones Janet Ajzenstat, Executive Vice-President of the Canadian Federation Professor Emeritus of Politics, McMaster University of Independent Business, Vancouver Brian Ferguson, Vaughn MacLellan Professor, Health Care Economics, University of Guelph DLA Piper (Canada) LLP, Toronto Jack Granatstein, Historian and former head of the Canadian War Museum Advisory Council Patrick James, Dornsife Dean’s Professor, University of Southern John Beck California President and CEO, Aecon Enterprises Inc., Toronto Rainer Knopff, Navjeet (Bob) Dhillon Professor Emeritus of Politics, University of Calgary President and CEO, Mainstreet Equity Corp., Calgary Larry Martin, Jim Dinning Prinicipal, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Archibald Descendants
    Archibald Descendants by James Clifford Retson Last Revised September 11 2020 Outline Descendant Report for John Archibald 1 John Archibald b: 30 Dec 1650 in Kennoway Paroch, Fife Scotland, d: 15 Nov 1728 in East Derry, (Londonderry),New Hampshire, USA + Jane Janet Tullock b: 1654 in Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland, d: 15 Nov 1728 in Londonderry, Londonderry, Ireland ...2 Robert J (Gilleasbaig) Archibald b: 1668 in Machra Parish, Londonderry, Ulster, Ireland, d: Apr 1765 in Londonderry, Rockingham, New Hampshire, USA + Ann Boyd b: 1668 in Londonderry, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, m: 1693 in Londonderry, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, d: 1765 in Londonderry, New Hampshire, USA ......3 John Major Archibald b: 1693 in Maghera, Londonderry, Ireland; Age on gravestone given as 58, d: 10 Aug 1751 in East Derry, Londonderry ,New Hampshire, USA; Age on gravestone given as 58 + Margaret Wilson b: 1700 in Londonderry, County Londonderry, Northern Ireland, m: Abt 1715 in Londonderry, Rockingham, New Hampshire, USA; Alternative 1716 Ireland, d: Aft. 1751 in Londonderry, Rockingham, New Hampshire, USA .........4 David Archibald Esq. b: 20 Sep 1717 in Maghera, Londonderry, Ireland, d: 09 Nov 1797 in Truro, Colchester County, Nova Scotia, Canada + Elizabeth Elliott b: 10 Jun 1720 in Londonderry,Derry,North Ireland, m: 19 May 1741 in Londonderry, NH, New England, USA, d: 19 Oct 1791 in Truro Township, Nova Scotia ............5 Samuel Archibald b: 11 Nov 1742 in Parish of Maghra [Maghera] Couny Londonderry, Ireland, d: 15 Feb 1780 in Nevis, West Indies + Rachel Todd Duncan b: Abt 1743 in Londonderry, New Hampshire, USA, m: Truro Township, Colchester County, NS.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario: the Centre of Confederation?
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2018-10 Reconsidering Confederation: Canada's Founding Debates, 1864-1999 University of Calgary Press Heidt, D. (Ed.). (2018). "Reconsidering Confederation: Canada's Founding Debates, 1864-1999". Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/108896 book https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca RECONSIDERING CONFEDERATION: Canada’s Founding Debates, 1864–1999 Edited by Daniel Heidt ISBN 978-1-77385-016-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence.
    [Show full text]
  • PELLIZZARI-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf (3.679Mb)
    A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Pellizzari, Peter. 2020. A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37365752 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 A dissertation presented by Peter Pellizzari to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2020 © 2020 Peter Pellizzari All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisors: Jane Kamensky and Jill Lepore Peter Pellizzari A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 Abstract The American Revolution not only marked the end of Britain’s control over thirteen rebellious colonies, but also the beginning of a division among subsequent historians that has long shaped our understanding of British America. Some historians have emphasized a continental approach and believe research should look west, toward the people that inhabited places outside the traditional “thirteen colonies” that would become the United States, such as the Gulf Coast or the Great Lakes region.
    [Show full text]
  • History 3231F
    THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Autumn 2012 HISTORY 3231F “Yours to Discover”: A History of Ontario Roger Hall Time: Wed” 1:30-3:30 Lawson Hall 2228 Place: STVH 2166 [email protected] The course is a survey of Ontario’s rich and varied past commencing with its founding as the colony of Upper Canada in the aftermath of the American Revolution and stretching to the modern day. Conducted in the form of a workshop with instructor and students both participating, a chronological frame is followed although individual sessions will pursue separate themes revealing the changing politics, society and economy. Each session, of which there will be two per weekly meeting, will include a brief introduction to the topic by the instructor, and then a verbal report prepared by a student, followed by questions and discussion. Assigned readings should make the discussion informative. Readings will be from prescribed texts, internet and library sources and handouts. There will be no mid-terms in this course. Reports will be made by students throughout the course; the essay themes can be the same as the reports—needless to say a superior performance will be expected in written work. There will be ONE essay and a final examination. GRADE BREAKDOWN Reports: 30% General Class Participation: 20% Essay 25% Final Exam 25% TEXTS: Randall White, Ontario, 1610-1985 (Toronto, Dundurn Press). Edgar-Andre Montigny and Lori Chambers, Ontario since Confederation, A Reader (Toronto, University of Toronto Press) R. Hall, W. Westfall and L. Sefton MacDowell, Patterns of the Past: Interpreting Ontario’s History (Toronto, Dundurn Press).
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGE BROWN the Reformer
    GEORGE BROWN The Reformer by Alastair C.F. Gillespie With a Foreword by the Hon. Preston Manning Board of Directors Richard Fadden Former National Security Advisor to the Prime Minister and former Deputy Minister of National Defence CHAIR Rob Wildeboer Brian Flemming Executive Chairman, Martinrea International Inc. International lawyer, writer, and policy advisor Robert Fulford VICE CHAIR Former Editor of Saturday Night magazine, columnist with Jacquelyn Thayer Scott the National Post Past President and Professor, Wayne Gudbranson Cape Breton University, Sydney CEO, Branham Group Inc., Ottawa MANAGING DIRECTOR Stanley Hartt Brian Lee Crowley Counsel, Norton Rose LLP SECRETARY Calvin Helin Lincoln Caylor International speaker, best-selling author, entrepreneur Partner, Bennett Jones LLP, Toronto and lawyer. TREASURER Peter John Nicholson Martin MacKinnon Former President, Canadian Council of Academies, Ottawa CFO, Black Bull Resources Inc., Halifax Hon. Jim Peterson Former federal cabinet minister, Counsel at Fasken DIRECTORS Martineau, Toronto Pierre Casgrain Maurice B. Tobin Director and Corporate Secretary of Casgrain the Tobin Foundation, Washington DC & Company Limited Erin Chutter President and CEO of Global Cobalt Corporation Research Advisory Board Laura Jones Janet Ajzenstat Executive Vice-President of the Canadian Federation Professor Emeritus of Politics, McMaster University of Independent Business (CFIB). Brian Ferguson Vaughn MacLellan Professor, Health Care Economics, University of Guelph DLA Piper (Canada) LLP Jack Granatstein Historian and former head of the Canadian War Museum Advisory Council Patrick James Professor, University of Southern California John Beck Rainer Knopff Chairman and CEO, Aecon Construction Ltd., Toronto Professor of Politics, University of Calgary Navjeet (Bob) Dhillon Larry Martin President and CEO, Mainstreet Equity Corp., Calgary Principal, Dr.
    [Show full text]