DOCSLIB.ORG

Students' Understanding of Non-Inertial Frames of Reference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Students' Understanding of Non-Inertial Frames of Reference PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH 16, 010112 (2020) Students’ understanding of non-inertial frames of reference S. Küchemann,1,* P. Klein,1 H. Fouckhardt,2 S. Gröber,1 and J. Kuhn1 1Department of Physics, Physics Education Research Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Strasse 46, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany 2Department of Physics, Integrated Optoelectronics and Microoptics Research Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Strasse 46, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany (Received 26 February 2019; accepted 4 March 2020; published 24 March 2020) The concepts of the Coriolis and the centrifugal force are essential in various scientific fields and they are standard components of introductory physics lectures. In this paper, we explore how students understand and apply concepts of rotating frames of reference in the context of an example lecture demonstration experiment. We found in a predict-observe-explain setting that after predicting the outcome prior to the demonstration, only one out of five physics students correctly reported the observation of the trajectory of a sphere rolling over a rotating disc. Despite this low score, a detailed analysis of distractors revealed a significant improvement in the distractor choices during the observation of the experiment. In this context, we identified three main preconceptions and learning difficulties: The centrifugal force seems to be only required to describe the trajectory if the object is coupled to the rotating system, the inertial forces cause a reaction of an object on which they act, and students systematically mix up the trajectories in the stationary and the rotating frame of reference. Furthermore, we captured students’ eye movements during the predict task and found that physics students with low confidence ratings focused longer on relevant task areas than confident students despite having a comparable score. Consequently, this metric is a helpful tool for the identification of preconceptions using eye tracking. Overall, the results help us to understand the complexity of concept learning from demonstration experiments and provide important implications for instructional design of introductions to rotating frames of reference. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010112 I. INTRODUCTION derive the equation of motion of objects in non-inertial frames of reference [14–22] or contain a descriptive Rotating frames of reference play an important role in approach to the topic [23–27]. However, there are several a variety of fields in physics. Accordingly, Coriolis and shortcomings and false accounts outlined below, potentially centrifugal terms need to be considered for an accurate causing incoherent conceptions and complications in stu- account of the theoretical description of the motion of dents’ understanding. an object in rotating reference frames. While the Coriolis In this paper, we explore how students understand and force was originally introduced to describe the energy apply concepts of rotating frames of reference in the direct transfer in water wheels, nowadays it is applied to problems context of an example lecture demonstration experiment. in meteorology [1,2], oceanography [3], astrophysics [4], Therefore, we identify and study relevant preconceptions, optics [5], and nuclear physics [6]. Given this wide range of the non-obvious learning effect of experiment observation, applications, the Coriolis and the inertial centrifugal force and the relationship between response security and duration (ICF) are sometimes topics in introductory physics courses of focus on relevant areas (as measured by eye tracking). in college-level education and, accordingly, there are a The paper is structured in the following way. After this large number of experiments and open online materials – introduction, an overview of the current state of research and [7 13] which intend to demonstrate the Coriolis effect, i.e., the preliminary work follows in the second section and the the apparent deflection of an object by the Coriolis force. third section explains the materials and methods used in Moreover, there are several mechanics textbooks which this work. The subsequent section contains the results of the predict-observe-explain (POE) test including self-confidence *[email protected] ratings, student interviews, and eye-tracking data in the context of an example demonstration experiment of rotating Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of frames of reference. Then, these results are discussed in the the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to context of previous literature and, eventually in the final the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, section, we conclude the manuscript with the main conse- and DOI. quences of the results for physics education research. 2469-9896=20=16(1)=010112(17) 010112-1 Published by the American Physical Society S. KÜCHEMANN et al. PHYS. REV. PHYS. EDUC. RES. 16, 010112 (2020) In this work, we address three research questions: that points outwards from the center of rotation can (1) What is the influence of a lecture experiment be responsible for this effect. demonstrating the motion of objects in non-inertial frames of reference on learning about the outcome of B. Why does the concept of inertial forces potentially the demonstration? cause problems for students? (2) What are the prevailing preconceptions of physics In some depictions of RFR the centrifugal force is students in the field of non-inertial frames of neglected when an object, which is moving in a RFR, reference? does not experience an interaction to the RFR. For instance, (3) Is there a specific eye-movement pattern that relates in Ref. [28], the author states that “the centrifugal effect is to the performance or confidence of physics students eliminated if there is no interaction between the rotating within a POE setting? disk and the body, like a ball rolling on the disk without friction.” This preconception that the centrifugal force only II. CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH AND occurs, when the object is somehow coupled (e.g., by PRELIMINARY WORK friction or a rope) to the rotating system [28] is potentially guided by empirical experiences, such as the feeling of a A. Simplified conceptions of the Coriolis effect force pointing outwards when sitting in a carousel or in a and the centrifugal force car driving through a turn, i.e., the body reacts to the force A theoretical framework containing the equation of motion because the person is actually partially coupled to the of an object described in a rotating frame of reference (RFR) rotating system. This seems to be in conflict with the (also termed non-inertial frame of reference) is provided in characteristic that fictitious forces do not occur as a action- Sec. A1. In simplified depictions of a curved trajectory of an reaction pair with another force [29]. This cognitive object in a RFR, the Coriolis force is often presented as the dissonance can be resolved by discriminating between only cause for the deflection [7–13]. However, according to the centrifugal force which occurs as a consequence to a Eq. (A2) (see Appendix), the ICF also acts on the object in a centripetal force (here termed “reactive centrifugal force,” vector sum with the Coriolis force. The fact that the ICF is a RCF, see Appendix, Sec. A3for an example of the RCF) necessary quantity to describe the trajectory of an object in and the one which occurs as a fictitious force in a RFR “ ” a rotating frame of reference can be understood from two ( inertial centrifugal force, ICF) [30] which occurs as a arguments of a thought experiment. consequence of a description from a rotating frame of (I) Let us imagine a situation where a plane flies in a reference. Sometimes textbooks and scientific articles lack uniform motion over a large rotating disc starting this helpful linguistic distinction between RCF and ICF from the center of rotation. If an observer located on [14,17,28,31,32]. The reason for this could be that the the disc used the Coriolis force for the description mathematical equations are the same, only the situations in of the curved trajectory only, they would calculate which they occur and how they are perceived are different. that the plane returns to the center of rotation at some For the occurrence of the RCF, a coupling to the RFR is point in time because the Coriolis force is always indeed required so it occurs when a centripetal force occurs. perpendicular to the direction of motion thus leading For the occurrence of the ICF, a coupling to the RFR is not to a circular trajectory. For an observer in an required. Accordingly, the occurrence of a centripetal force stationary frame of reference (SFR), however, it is can be perceived (and might be related to the occurrence of obvious that this case would not occur because the the RCF) when driving through a turn or sitting in a merry plane flies in a uniform motion due to the absence of go round, whereas the occurrence of the ICF, for instance, any real force. In reality, the plane would pursue a for a passenger in an airplane flying in a uniform motion spiral trajectory for the observer in the RFR which is over a rotating disc, cannot be felt. the consequence of the vector sum of the inertial Apart from the RCF and ICF, a centrifugal force term ’ ’ centrifugal force and Coriolis force. may also occur as a d Alembert s force as pointed out by (II) During the aforementioned motion of the plane, the Kobayashi, which is an inertial resistance and occurs as a absolute value of the velocity jv⃗0j in the RFR would consequence of a coordinate transformation [30] to plane 0 “ increase according to Eq. (A1) because v⃗is a vector polar coordinates and has the form mass × centripetal ” sum of two perpendicular vectors, the velocity in the acceleration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Experimental Determination of the Moment of Inertia of a Model Airplane Michael Koken [email protected]
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors Honors Research Projects College Fall 2017 The Experimental Determination of the Moment of Inertia of a Model Airplane Michael Koken [email protected] Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons, Aviation Commons, Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons, Mechanical Engineering Commons, and the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Koken, Michael, "The Experimental Determination of the Moment of Inertia of a Model Airplane" (2017). Honors Research Projects. 585. http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/585 This Honors Research Project is brought to you for free and open access by The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Research Projects by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 2017 THE EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF A MODEL AIRPLANE KOKEN, MICHAEL THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Honors Project TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Explain Inertial and Noninertial Frame of Reference
    Explain Inertial And Noninertial Frame Of Reference Nathanial crows unsmilingly. Grooved Sibyl harlequin, his meadow-brown add-on deletes mutely. Nacred or deputy, Sterne never soot any degeneration! In inertial frames of the air, hastening their fundamental forces on two forces must be frame and share information section i am throwing the car, there is not a severe bottleneck in What city the greatest value in flesh-seconds for this deviation. The definition of key facet having a small, polished surface have a force gem about a pretend or aspect of something. Fictitious Forces and Non-inertial Frames The Coriolis Force. Indeed, for death two particles moving anyhow, a coordinate system may be found among which saturated their trajectories are rectilinear. Inertial reference frame of inertial frames of angular momentum and explain why? This is illustrated below. Use tow of reference in as sentence Sentences YourDictionary. What working the difference between inertial frame and non inertial fr. Frames of Reference Isaac Physics. In forward though some time and explain inertial and noninertial of frame to prove your measurement problem you. This circumstance undermines a defining characteristic of inertial frames: that with respect to shame given inertial frame, the other inertial frame home in uniform rectilinear motion. The redirect does not rub at any valid page. That according to whether the thaw is inertial or non-inertial In the. This follows from what Einstein formulated as his equivalence principlewhich, in an, is inspired by the consequences of fire fall. Frame of reference synonyms Best 16 synonyms for was of. How read you govern a bleed of reference? Name we will balance in noninertial frame at its axis from another hamiltonian with each printed as explained at all.
    [Show full text]
  • On the History of the Radiation Reaction1 Kirk T
    On the History of the Radiation Reaction1 Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (May 6, 2017; updated March 18, 2020) 1 Introduction Apparently, Kepler considered the pointing of comets’ tails away from the Sun as evidence for radiation pressure of light [2].2 Following Newton’s third law (see p. 83 of [3]), one might suppose there to be a reaction of the comet back on the incident light. However, this theme lay largely dormant until Poincar´e (1891) [37, 41] and Planck (1896) [46] discussed the effect of “radiation damping” on an oscillating electric charge that emits electromagnetic radiation. Already in 1892, Lorentz [38] had considered the self force on an extended, accelerated charge e, finding that for low velocity v this force has the approximate form (in Gaussian units, where c is the speed of light in vacuum), independent of the radius of the charge, 3e2 d2v 2e2v¨ F = = . (v c). (1) self 3c3 dt2 3c3 Lorentz made no connection at the time between this force and radiation, which connection rather was first made by Planck [46], who considered that there should be a damping force on an accelerated charge in reaction to its radiation, and by a clever transformation arrived at a “radiation-damping” force identical to eq. (1). Today, Lorentz is often credited with identifying eq. (1) as the “radiation-reaction force”, and the contribution of Planck is seldom acknowledged. This note attempts to review the history of thoughts on the “radiation reaction”, which seems to be in conflict with the brief discussions in many papers and “textbooks”.3 2 What is “Radiation”? The “radiation reaction” would seem to be a reaction to “radiation”, but the concept of “radiation” is remarkably poorly defined in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Mechanics
    Classical Mechanics Hyoungsoon Choi Spring, 2014 Contents 1 Introduction4 1.1 Kinematics and Kinetics . .5 1.2 Kinematics: Watching Wallace and Gromit ............6 1.3 Inertia and Inertial Frame . .8 2 Newton's Laws of Motion 10 2.1 The First Law: The Law of Inertia . 10 2.2 The Second Law: The Equation of Motion . 11 2.3 The Third Law: The Law of Action and Reaction . 12 3 Laws of Conservation 14 3.1 Conservation of Momentum . 14 3.2 Conservation of Angular Momentum . 15 3.3 Conservation of Energy . 17 3.3.1 Kinetic energy . 17 3.3.2 Potential energy . 18 3.3.3 Mechanical energy conservation . 19 4 Solving Equation of Motions 20 4.1 Force-Free Motion . 21 4.2 Constant Force Motion . 22 4.2.1 Constant force motion in one dimension . 22 4.2.2 Constant force motion in two dimensions . 23 4.3 Varying Force Motion . 25 4.3.1 Drag force . 25 4.3.2 Harmonic oscillator . 29 5 Lagrangian Mechanics 30 5.1 Configuration Space . 30 5.2 Lagrangian Equations of Motion . 32 5.3 Generalized Coordinates . 34 5.4 Lagrangian Mechanics . 36 5.5 D'Alembert's Principle . 37 5.6 Conjugate Variables . 39 1 CONTENTS 2 6 Hamiltonian Mechanics 40 6.1 Legendre Transformation: From Lagrangian to Hamiltonian . 40 6.2 Hamilton's Equations . 41 6.3 Configuration Space and Phase Space . 43 6.4 Hamiltonian and Energy . 45 7 Central Force Motion 47 7.1 Conservation Laws in Central Force Field . 47 7.2 The Path Equation .
    [Show full text]
  • Power Sources Challenge
    POWER SOURCES CHALLENGE FUSION PHYSICS! A CLEAN ENERGY Summary: What if we could harness the power of the Sun for energy here on Fusion reactions occur when two nuclei come together to form one Earth? What would it take to accomplish this feat? Is it possible? atom. The reaction that happens in the sun fuses two Hydrogen atoms together to produce Helium. It looks like this in a very simplified way: Many researchers including our Department of Energy scientists and H + H He + ENERGY. This energy can be calculated by the famous engineers are taking on this challenge! In fact, there is one DOE Laboratory Einstein equation, E = mc2. devoted to fusion physics and is committed to being at the forefront of the science of magnetic fusion energy. Each of the colliding hydrogen atoms is a different isotope of In order to understand a little more about fusion energy, you will learn about hydrogen, one deuterium and one the atom and how reactions at the atomic level produce energy. tritium. The difference in these isotopes is simply one neutron. Background: It all starts with plasma! If you need to learn more about plasma Deuterium has one proton and one physics, visit the Power Sources Challenge plasma activities. neutron, tritium has one proton and two neutrons. Look at the The Fusion Reaction that happens in the SUN looks like this: illustration—do you see how the mass of the products is less than the mass of the reactants? That is called a mass deficit and that difference in mass is converted into energy.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYSICS of ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY Angie Bukley1, William Paloski,2 and Gilles Clément1,3
    Chapter 2 PHYSICS OF ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY Angie Bukley1, William Paloski,2 and Gilles Clément1,3 1 Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA 2 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA 3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France This chapter discusses potential technologies for achieving artificial gravity in a space vehicle. We begin with a series of definitions and a general description of the rotational dynamics behind the forces ultimately exerted on the human body during centrifugation, such as gravity level, gravity gradient, and Coriolis force. Human factors considerations and comfort limits associated with a rotating environment are then discussed. Finally, engineering options for designing space vehicles with artificial gravity are presented. Figure 2-01. Artist's concept of one of NASA early (1962) concepts for a manned space station with artificial gravity: a self- inflating 22-m-diameter rotating hexagon. Photo courtesy of NASA. 1 ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY: WHAT IS IT? 1.1 Definition Artificial gravity is defined in this book as the simulation of gravitational forces aboard a space vehicle in free fall (in orbit) or in transit to another planet. Throughout this book, the term artificial gravity is reserved for a spinning spacecraft or a centrifuge within the spacecraft such that a gravity-like force results. One should understand that artificial gravity is not gravity at all. Rather, it is an inertial force that is indistinguishable from normal gravity experience on Earth in terms of its action on any mass. A centrifugal force proportional to the mass that is being accelerated centripetally in a rotating device is experienced rather than a gravitational pull.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 101 Today Chapter 5: Newton's Third
    Physics 101 Today Chapter 5: Newton’s Third Law First, let’s clarify notion of a force : Previously defined force as a push or pull. Better to think of force as an interaction between two objects. You can’t push anything without it pushing back on you ! Whenever one object exerts a force on a second object, the second object exerts an equal and opposite force on the first. Newton’s 3 rd Law - often called “action-reaction ” Eg. Leaning against a wall. You push against the wall. The wall is also pushing on you, equally hard – normal/support force. Now place a piece of paper between the wall and hand. Push on it – it doesn’t accelerate must be zero net force. The wall is pushing equally as hard (normal force) on the paper in the opposite direction to your hand, resulting in zero Fnet . This is more evident when hold a balloon against the wall – it is squashed on both sides. Eg. You pull on a cart. It accelerates. The cart pulls back on you (you feel the rope get tighter). Can call your pull the “ action ” and cart’s pull the “ reaction ”. Or, the other way around. • Newton’s 3 rd law means that forces always come in action -reaction pairs . It doesn’t matter which is called the action and which is called the reaction. • Note: Action-reaction pairs never act on the same object Examples of action-reaction force pairs In fact it is the road’s push that makes the car go forward. Same when we walk – push back on floor, floor pushes us forward.
    [Show full text]
  • HW 6, Question 1: Forces in a Rotating Frame
    HW 6, Question 1: Forces in a Rotating Frame Consider a solid platform, like a \merry-go round", that rotates with respect to an inertial frame of reference. It is oriented in the xy plane such that the axis of rotation is in the z-direction, i.e. ! = !z^, which we can take to point out of the page. Now, let us also consider a person walking on the rotating platform, such that this person is walking radially outward on the platform with respect to their (non-inertial) reference frame with velocity v = vr^. In what follows for Question 1, directions in the non-inertial reference frame (i.e. the frame of the walking person) are defined in the following manner: the x0-direction points directly outward from the center of the merry-go round; the y0 points in the tangential direction of rotation in the plane of the platform; and the z0-direction points out of the page, and in the same direction as the z-direction for the inertial reference frame. (a) Identify all forces. Since the person's reference frame is non-inertial, we need to account for the various fictitious forces given the description above, as well as any other external/reaction forces. The angular rate of rotation is constant, and so the Euler force Feul = m(!_ × r) = ~0. The significant forces acting on the person are: 0 • the force due to gravity, Fg = mg = mg(−z^ ), 2 0 • the (fictitious) centrifugal force, Fcen = m! × (! × r) = m! rx^ , 0 • the (fictitious) Coriolis force, Fcor = 2mv × ! = 2m!v(−y^ ), • the normal force the person experiences from the rotating platform N = Nz^0, and • a friction force acting on the person, f, in the x0y0 plane.
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURES 20 - 29 INTRODUCTION to CLASSICAL MECHANICS Prof
    LECTURES 20 - 29 INTRODUCTION TO CLASSICAL MECHANICS Prof. N. Harnew University of Oxford HT 2017 1 OUTLINE : INTRODUCTION TO MECHANICS LECTURES 20-29 20.1 The hyperbolic orbit 20.2 Hyperbolic orbit : the distance of closest approach 20.3 Hyperbolic orbit: the angle of deflection, φ 20.3.1 Method 1 : using impulse 20.3.2 Method 2 : using hyperbola orbit parameters 20.4 Hyperbolic orbit : Rutherford scattering 21.1 NII for system of particles - translation motion 21.1.1 Kinetic energy and the CM 21.2 NII for system of particles - rotational motion 21.2.1 Angular momentum and the CM 21.3 Introduction to Moment of Inertia 21.3.1 Extend the example : J not parallel to ! 21.3.2 Moment of inertia : mass not distributed in a plane 21.3.3 Generalize for rigid bodies 22.1 Moment of inertia tensor 2 22.1.1 Rotation about a principal axis 22.2 Moment of inertia & energy of rotation 22.3 Calculation of moments of inertia 22.3.1 MoI of a thin rectangular plate 22.3.2 MoI of a thin disk perpendicular to plane of disk 22.3.3 MoI of a solid sphere 23.1 Parallel axis theorem 23.1.1 Example : compound pendulum 23.2 Perpendicular axis theorem 23.2.1 Perpendicular axis theorem : example 23.3 Example 1 : solid ball rolling down slope 23.4 Example 2 : where to hit a ball with a cricket bat 23.5 Example 3 : an aircraft landing 24.1 Lagrangian mechanics : Introduction 24.2 Introductory example : the energy method for the E of M 24.3 Becoming familiar with the jargon 24.3.1 Generalised coordinates 24.3.2 Degrees of Freedom 24.3.3 Constraints 3 24.3.4 Configuration
    [Show full text]
  • Centripetal Force Is Balanced by the Circular Motion of the Elctron Causing the Centrifugal Force
    STANDARD SC1 b. Construct an argument to support the claim that the proton (and not the neutron or electron) defines the element’s identity. c. Construct an explanation based on scientific evidence of the production of elements heavier than hydrogen by nuclear fusion. d. Construct an explanation that relates the relative abundance of isotopes of a particular element to the atomic mass of the element. First, we quickly review pre-requisite concepts One of the most curious observations with atoms is the fact that there are charged particles inside the atom and there is also constant spinning and Warm-up 1: List the name, charge, mass, and location of the three subatomic circling. How does atom remain stable under these conditions? Remember particles Opposite charges attract each other; Like charges repel each other. Your Particle Location Charge Mass in a.m.u. Task: Read the following information and consult with your teacher as STABILITY OF ATOMS needed, answer Warm-Up tasks 2 and 3 on Page 2. (3) Death spiral does not occur at all! This is because the centripetal force is balanced by the circular motion of the elctron causing the centrifugal force. The centrifugal force is the outward force from the center to the circumference of the circle. Electrons not only spin on their own axis, they are also in a constant circular motion around the nucleus. Despite this terrific movement, electrons are very stable. The stability of electrons mainly comes from the electrostatic forces of attraction between the nucleus and the electrons. The electrostatic forces are also known as Coulombic Forces of Attraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Sliding and Rolling: the Physics of a Rolling Ball J Hierrezuelo Secondary School I B Reyes Catdicos (Vdez- Mdaga),Spain and C Carnero University of Malaga, Spain
    Sliding and rolling: the physics of a rolling ball J Hierrezuelo Secondary School I B Reyes Catdicos (Vdez- Mdaga),Spain and C Carnero University of Malaga, Spain We present an approach that provides a simple and there is an extra difficulty: most students think that it adequate procedure for introducing the concept of is not possible for a body to roll without slipping rolling friction. In addition, we discuss some unless there is a frictional force involved. In fact, aspects related to rolling motion that are the when we ask students, 'why do rolling bodies come to source of students' misconceptions. Several rest?, in most cases the answer is, 'because the didactic suggestions are given. frictional force acting on the body provides a negative acceleration decreasing the speed of the Rolling motion plays an important role in many body'. In order to gain a good understanding of familiar situations and in a number of technical rolling motion, which is bound to be useful in further applications, so this kind of motion is the subject of advanced courses. these aspects should be properly considerable attention in most introductory darified. mechanics courses in science and engineering. The outline of this article is as follows. Firstly, we However, we often find that students make errors describe the motion of a rigid sphere on a rigid when they try to interpret certain situations related horizontal plane. In this section, we compare two to this motion. situations: (1) rolling and slipping, and (2) rolling It must be recognized that a correct analysis of rolling without slipping.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Inertial, Centrifugal, and Centripetal Forces and Motions The
    Measuring Inertial, Centrifugal, and Centripetal Forces and Motions Many people are quite confused about the true nature and dynamics of cen- trifugal and centripetal forces. Some believe that centrifugal force is a fictitious radial force that can’t be measured. Others claim it is a real force equal and opposite to measured centripetal force. It is sometimes thought to be a continu- ous positive acceleration like centripetal force. Crackpot theorists ignore all measurements and claim the centrifugal force comes out of the aether or spa- cetime continuum surrounding a spinning body. The true reality of centripetal and centrifugal forces can be easily determined by simply measuring them with accelerometers rather than by imagining metaphysical assumptions. The Momentum and Energy of the Cannon versus a Cannonball Cannon Ball vs Cannon Momentum and Energy Force = mass x acceleration ma = Momentum = mv m = 100 kg m = 1 kg v = p/m = 1 m/s v = p/m = 100 m/s p = mv 100 p = mv = 100 energy = mv2/2 = 50 J energy = mv2/2 = 5,000 J Force p = mv = p = mv p=100 Momentum p = 100 Energy mv2/2 = mv2 = mv2/2 Cannon ball has the same A Force always produces two momentum as the cannon equal momenta but it almost but has 100 times more never produces two equal kinetic energy. quantities of kinetic energy. In the following thought experiment with a cannon and golden cannon ball, their individual momentum is easy to calculate because they are always equal. However, the recoil energy from the force of the gunpowder is much greater for the ball than the cannon.
    [Show full text]