DOCSLIB.ORG

Astronomy 422

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Astronomy 422 Lecture 20: Cosmic Microwave Background Key concepts: The CMB Recombination Radiation and matter eras Next time: Astro 422 Peer Review - Make sure to read all 6 proposals and send in rankings and written reports by Monday afternoon Term papers Monday, May 9, 5pm: The full paper is due. April 28 – May 5: Term paper presentations. Each presentation will be 15 minutes, plus 5 minutes for questions. Attending these presentations is required. Audience participation counts (everybody has to ask a question). Paper format: The paper should be between 10-15 pages in length, font size 12pt (single-spaced). Include an abstract, figures and citations, and a reference list. Some good info on format of a report can be found at http://www.studygs.net/labreports.htm Also an example report is posted on the class web page (good even if it was missing an abstract; make sure you remember to include one). Astro 422 Presentations: Thursday April 28: 9:30 – 9:50 _Isaiah Santistevan__________ 9:50 – 10:10 _Cameron Trapp____________ 10:10 – 10:30 _________________________ Tuesday May 3: 9:30 – 9:50 _________________________ 9:50 – 10:10 __________________________ 10:10 – 10:30 _________________________ Thursday May 5: 9:30 – 9:50 _Montie Avery_______________ 9:50 – 10:10 _Andrea Tallbrother_________ 10:10 – 10:30 _________________________ 10:30 – 10:50 _________________________ Send me your preference. First come, first served. Papers graded on three main criteria: 1. Structure and readability • did you divide text into proper sections? • do you have good titles/subtitles for the sections? (use your outline!) • Does your paper tell a story? 2. Content • is the material in a logical order? • have you repeated material (don't do that! restructuring is needed if this is the case) • did you include figures to explain? With a good figure caption? 3. Use of references • do you have a reference list? • are you referring to these references in the text? Recap: 1 1 2 3 2 3 k=0: Unbound: E>0 Critical: E=0 Bound: E<0 • Recollapsing Universe: expansion will someday halt and reverse • Critical Universe: will not collapse, but approach “steady state” • Coasting Universe: will expand forever with little slowdown • Accelerating Universe: expansion will accelerate with time Redshift The redshift factor 1+z is a parameter to describe the expansion of the universe. The light of a redshift 6.4 quasar left the source when the universe was 1/7.4 times as large as it is now. How old was it then? If k=0 we derived Thus t= 650 Myr. Who Discovered the Microwave Background? Cosmic Microwave Background First seen by McKellar in 1940 using optical observations of interstellar molecules. Rotationally excited CN is observed with T ~ 2.3 K A microwave background was predicted in the hot big bang model of Gamow, including classic 1948 paper by Alpher, Bethe, and Gamow explaining high He abundance Alpher & Herman in 1948 predict T0 ~ 1K or 5K Cosmic Microwave Background Discovered in 1964 by Penzias and Wilson Interpreted in companion paper by Dicke, Roll and Wilkinson as the CMB COBE 1991: perfect blackbody spectrum Primary anisotropies measured. TCMB = 2.725 K Cosmic Microwave Background Relic radiation from early Universe, when it was hot and dense, in thermal equilibrium. Expansion => universe cooled and became optically thin. CMB could propagate with negligible interaction with matter. Radiation decoupled. Thermal equilibrium => blackbody spectrum. The CMB Relic radiation from early Universe, when it was hot and dense, in thermal equilibrium. T0 = 2.725 K Blackbody spectrum. Energy density from integrating across all wavelengths, and correcting for solid angle (ch 9). • Current energy density of the CMB = 0.261 MeV m-3 • But energy per photon small, so number density of CMB photons high: • Compare to those of baryons (p,n): ~800 times bigger • Thus baryons are outnumbered by photons, but energy density larger. Energy per CMB photon is 6x10-4 eV COBE (1989 launch) resulted in three important results: 1. At any position on the sky, the spectrum is very close to that of an ideal blackbody. 2. The CMB has a dipole distortion (slightly blueshifted in one part of the sky, and redshifted in another). Doppler shift of COBE satellite relative to frame of reference where CMB is isotropic. Since λmax ∝ 1/T, a shift in λmax implies a shift in T. Generally is the direction of motion. If v<<c: Thus, we can measure Sun's motion with respect to the CMB (Hubble flow): 370 km/s toward RA=11.2h, Dec=-7°. Taking into account – the motion of COBE around Earth – the orbital motion of Earth around the Sun – the motion of the Sun in the Milky Way – and the motion of the Milky Way within the Local Group => the LG has a peculiar motion: 627 km/s toward RA=11.1h, Dec=-27°. We (mostly) understand this as gravitational effect on us by large masses (e.g. "Great Attractor", other superclusters). 3. Subtracting the dipole, there are small anisotropies (and the galactic plane) remaining: Temperature fluctuations of the order of 10-5 K. 3. Subtracting the galactic background: Temperature fluctuations of the order of 10-5 K. Planck The horizon problem (without inflation) • That the CMB has a nearly perfect BB spectrum, and is nearly isotropic provide strong support for the Big Bang model of the universe. • As universe expands, u∝R-4 (R-3 from space expansion, R-1 from wavelength increase with R and E=hc/λ). Recombination and decoupling What are the CMB fluctuations? They reflect small density fluctuations at the time of decoupling. Before decoupling, matter and radiation interacted constantly. Process: Baryonic matter goes from ionized plasma to a gas of neutral atoms. Closely related process: By which universe goes from being opaque to transparent. Three closely related, but not identical moments: 1. The epoch of recombination. When baryonic components go from ionized to neutral state. 1. Numerically defined as when number density of ions equals number density of neutral atoms. 2. The epoch of decoupling. When the time rate at which photons scatter from electrons becomes smaller that the Hubble parameter (ie expansion rate of the universe). Universe becomes transparent. 3. The epoch of last scattering. When a typical CMB photon underwent its last scattering off an electron. Defines the surface of last scattering. When does recombination take place? • Early universe was hot, ionized. High opacity due to electron scattering. • As universe expands, gas cools and becomes atomic • We can estimate temperature from the Saha equation: • Considering only hydrogen, we can solve for T when half of e and p combine to neutral. • Find T ~ 3000 K. -3 • Since RT=R0T0=T0., Rrecomb~10 R0. • Since R=1/(1+z), recombination happened at z~1000. • Actual WMAP value, z=1089±1. Radiation and Matter eras • For CMB • Using m=E/c2, can express a mass density associated with radiation. • For matter, • Currently, • Early universe was radiation dominated. • Later it became matter dominated. • Now evidently dark matter/energy dominated (more in next lecture). Let's get back to the temperature fluctuations: • Dipole distortion is due to the fact that Universe is not perfectly homogeneous today. – Gravitationally accelerated toward lumps of matter, causing a Doppler shift. • Distortions on smaller scales due to the fact that universe was not perfectly homogeneous at the time of the last scattering. – Angular size reflects physical size of density fluctuations. What causes the fluctuations? Assume a CMB photon in the minima of a potential well, in a dense region. Climbing out, it looses energy and becomes redshifted (cooler). Thus, denser regions are cooler. This is referred to as the Sachs-Wolfe effect. Regions of higher mass-energy density had higher radiation pressure => photons stream into lower pressure regions => pressure went up in those regions => oscillations driven by photon pressure. • Nature of a sound wave depends on the material in which it travels – e.g. travels faster in water than in air • By studying the fluctuations caused by sound waves we will learn about the material – Average density of matter (and dark energy) – Hubble constant Largest CMB oscillations at time of decoupling correspond to distance that light could have traveled by that time (the "sonic horizon distance"). C&O show that At decoupling: tdec = 370,000 yrs => For a flat universe, k=0, the relation between proper distance to remote objects and angular diameter is: We also have With (for matter era) With How does this compare to actual angular size of anisotropies? Angular scale So angular size of CMB fluctuations consistent with a flat universe. Now, radiation energy density is negligible, so The CMB anisotropies depend critically on Cosmological parameters: H0,ΩR, ΩM, ΩΛ , Ωb, ... Different parameters predict different CMB power spectra. € 2003 WMAP, 2004 Models Planck 2013 Secondary anisotropies The Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect, predicted in the 1970s. CMB photons T = (1 + z) 2.725K galaxy cluster with hot ICM z ~ 0 - 3 scattered photons (hotter) CMB photons have a ~1% chance of last scattering inverse Compton scattering off of the ICM surface electrons; photon number is conserved z ~ 1100 • This wavelength shift translates into a temperature shift • Thus, can be seen as a higher order effect in the CMB • The shift is independent of redshift • Since clusters of galaxies collapse from large volumes (1000 Mpc^3), the ratio of baryons to dark matter should be representative of the universe as a whole. Observations of SZ determine the baryon fraction in the universe. Next time: Chapter 29.3.
Recommended publications
  • Neutrino Decoupling Beyond the Standard Model: CMB Constraints on the Dark Matter Mass with a Fast and Precise Neff Evaluation

    Neutrino Decoupling Beyond the Standard Model: CMB Constraints on the Dark Matter Mass with a Fast and Precise Neff Evaluation

    KCL-2018-76 Prepared for submission to JCAP Neutrino decoupling beyond the Standard Model: CMB constraints on the Dark Matter mass with a fast and precise Neff evaluation Miguel Escudero Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology Group Department of Physics, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The number of effective relativistic neutrino species represents a fundamental probe of the thermal history of the early Universe, and as such of the Standard Model of Particle Physics. Traditional approaches to the process of neutrino decoupling are either very technical and computationally expensive, or assume that neutrinos decouple instantaneously. In this work, we aim to fill the gap between these two approaches by modeling neutrino decoupling in terms of two simple coupled differential equations for the electromagnetic and neutrino sector temperatures, in which all the relevant interactions are taken into account and which allows for a straightforward implementation of BSM species. Upon including finite temperature QED corrections we reach an accuracy on Neff in the SM of 0:01. We illustrate the usefulness of this approach to neutrino decoupling by considering, in a model independent manner, the impact of MeV thermal dark matter on Neff . We show that Planck rules out electrophilic and neutrinophilic thermal dark matter particles of m < 3:0 MeV at 95% CL regardless of their spin, and of their annihilation being s-wave or p-wave. We point out arXiv:1812.05605v4 [hep-ph] 6 Sep 2019 that thermal dark matter particles with non-negligible interactions with both electrons and neutrinos are more elusive to CMB observations than purely electrophilic or neutrinophilic ones.
  • Majorana Neutrino Magnetic Moment and Neutrino Decoupling in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

    Majorana Neutrino Magnetic Moment and Neutrino Decoupling in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 92, 125020 (2015) Majorana neutrino magnetic moment and neutrino decoupling in big bang nucleosynthesis † ‡ N. Vassh,1,* E. Grohs,2, A. B. Balantekin,1, and G. M. Fuller3,§ 1Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA 2Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA 3Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA (Received 1 October 2015; published 22 December 2015) We examine the physics of the early universe when Majorana neutrinos (νe, νμ, ντ) possess transition magnetic moments. These extra couplings beyond the usual weak interaction couplings alter the way neutrinos decouple from the plasma of electrons/positrons and photons. We calculate how transition magnetic moment couplings modify neutrino decoupling temperatures, and then use a full weak, strong, and electromagnetic reaction network to compute corresponding changes in big bang nucleosynthesis abundance yields. We find that light element abundances and other cosmological parameters are sensitive to −10 magnetic couplings on the order of 10 μB. Given the recent analysis of sub-MeV Borexino data which −11 constrains Majorana moments to the order of 10 μB or less, we find that changes in cosmological parameters from magnetic contributions to neutrino decoupling temperatures are below the level of upcoming precision observations. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.125020 PACS numbers: 13.15.+g, 26.35.+c, 14.60.St, 14.60.Lm I. INTRODUCTION Such processes alter the primordial abundance yields which can be used to constrain the allowed sterile neutrino mass In this paper we explore how the early universe, and the and magnetic moment parameter space [4].
  • The Big Bang Cosmological Model: Theory and Observations

    The Big Bang Cosmological Model: Theory and Observations

    THE BIG BANG COSMOLOGICAL MODEL: THEORY AND OBSERVATIONS MARTINA GERBINO INFN, sezione di Ferrara ISAPP 2021 Valencia July 22st, 2021 1 Structure formation Maps of CMB anisotropies show the Universe as it was at the time of recombination. The CMB field is isotropic and !" the rms fluctuations (in total intensity) are very small, < | |# > ~10$% (even smaller in polarization). Density " perturbations � ≡ ��/� are proportional to CMB fluctuations. It is possible to show that, at recombination, perturbations could be from a few (for baryons) to at most 100 times (for CDM) larger than CMB fluctuations. We need a theory of structure formation that allows to link the tiny perturbations at z~1100 to the large scale structure of the Universe we observe today (from galaxies to clusters and beyond). General picture: small density perturbations grow via gravitational instability (Jeans mechanism). The growth is suppressed during radiation-domination and eventually kicks-off after the time of equality (z~3000). When inside the horizon, perturbations grow proportional to the scale factor as long as they are in MD and remain in the linear regime (� ≪ 1). M. GERBINO 2 ISAPP-VALENCIA, 22 JULY 2021 Preliminaries & (⃗ $&) Density contrast �(�⃗) ≡ and its Fourier expansion � = ∫ �+� �(�⃗) exp(��. �⃗) &) * Credits: Kolb&Turner 2� � � ≡ ; � = ; � = ��; � ,-./ � ,-./ � � �+, �� � ≡ �+ �; � � = �(�)$+� ∝ 6 ,-./ -01 6 �+/#, �� �+ �(�) ≈ �3 -01 2� The amplitude of perturbations as they re-enter the horizon is given by the primordial power spectrum. Once perturbations re-enter the horizon, micro-physics processes modify the primordial spectrum Scale factor M. GERBINO 3 ISAPP-VALENCIA, 22 JULY 2021 Jeans mechanism (non-expanding) The Newtonian motion of a perfect fluid is decribed via the Eulerian equations.
  • Arxiv:0910.5224V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 27 Oct 2009

    Arxiv:0910.5224V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 27 Oct 2009

    Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Bruce A. Bassett 1,2,a & Ren´ee Hlozek1,2,3,b 1 South African Astronomical Observatory, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa 7700 2 Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa 7700 3 Department of Astrophysics, University of Oxford Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3RH, UK a [email protected] b [email protected] Abstract Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) are frozen relics left over from the pre-decoupling universe. They are the standard rulers of choice for 21st century cosmology, provid- ing distance estimates that are, for the first time, firmly rooted in well-understood, linear physics. This review synthesises current understanding regarding all aspects of BAO cosmology, from the theoretical and statistical to the observational, and includes a map of the future landscape of BAO surveys, both spectroscopic and photometric . † 1.1 Introduction Whilst often phrased in terms of the quest to uncover the nature of dark energy, a more general rubric for cosmology in the early part of the 21st century might also be the “the distance revolution”. With new knowledge of the extra-galactic distance arXiv:0910.5224v1 [astro-ph.CO] 27 Oct 2009 ladder we are, for the first time, beginning to accurately probe the cosmic expansion history beyond the local universe. While standard candles – most notably Type Ia supernovae (SNIa) – kicked off the revolution, it is clear that Statistical Standard Rulers, and the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) in particular, will play an increasingly important role. In this review we cover the theoretical, observational and statistical aspects of the BAO as standard rulers and examine the impact BAO will have on our understand- † This review is an extended version of a chapter in the book Dark Energy Ed.
  • Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Under the Hood

    Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Under the Hood

    Baryon acoustic oscillations! under the hood Martin White UC Berkeley/LBNL Santa Fe, NM July 2010 Acoustic oscillations seen! First “compression”, at kcstls=π. Density maxm, velocity null. Velocity maximum First “rarefaction” peak at kcstls=2π Acoustic scale is set by the sound horizon at last scattering: s = cstls CMB calibration • Not coincidentally the sound horizon is extremely well determined by the structure of the acoustic peaks in the CMB. WMAP 5th yr data Dominated by uncertainty in ρm from poor constraints near 3rd peak in CMB spectrum. (Planck will nail this!) Baryon oscillations in P(k) • Since the baryons contribute ~15% of the total matter density, the total gravitational potential is affected by the acoustic oscillations with scale set by s. • This leads to small oscillations in the matter power spectrum P(k). – No longer order unity, like in the CMB – Now suppressed by Ωb/Ωm ~ 0.1 • Note: all of the matter sees the acoustic oscillations, not just the baryons. Baryon (acoustic) oscillations RMS fluctuation Wavenumber Divide out the gross trend … A damped, almost harmonic sequence of “wiggles” in the power spectrum of the mass perturbations of amplitude O(10%). Higher order effects • The matter and radiation oscillations are not in phase, and the phase shift depends on k. • There is a subtle shift in the oscillations with k due to the fact that the universe is expanding and becoming more matter dominated. • The finite duration of decoupling and rapid change in mfp means the damping of the oscillations on small scales is not a simple Gaussian shape.
  • Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the Planck Mission

    Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the Planck Mission

    Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the Planck Mission H. Kurki-Suonio Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki Institute of Physics, Finland Abstract This lecture is a sketch of the physics of the cosmic microwave background. The observed anisotropy can be divided into four main contributions: varia- tions in the temperature and gravitational potential of the primordial plasma, Doppler effect from its motion, and a net red/blueshift the photons accumulate from traveling through evolving gravitational potentials on their way from the primordial plasma to here. These variations are due to primordial perturba- tions, probably caused by quantum fluctuations in the very early universe. The ongoing Planck satellite mission to observe the cosmic microwave background is also described. 1 Introduction The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is radiation that comes from the early universe. In the early universe, ordinary matter was in the form of hot hydrogen and helium plasma which was almost homoge- neously distributed in space. Almost all electrons were free. Because of scattering from these electrons, the mean free path of photons was short compared to cosmological distance scales: the universe was opaque. As the universe expanded, this plasma cooled, and first the helium ions, then also the hydrogen ions captured the free electrons: the plasma was converted into gas and the universe became transparent. After that the photons of the thermal radiation of this primordial plasma have travelled through the uni- verse and we observe them today as the CMB. The CMB is close to isotropic, i.e., the microwave sky appears almost equally bright in every direction.
  • Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. Equation and Physical Interpretation

    Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. Equation and Physical Interpretation

    Scientia et Technica Año XXIII, Vol. 23, No. 02, junio de 2018. Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. ISSN 0122-1701 263 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. Equation and physical interpretation Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. Equation and physical interpretation. Leandro Manuel Pardo Calderón Observatorio Astronómico Nacional, Universidad Nacional, Bogotá D.C., Colombia [email protected] Abstract —Baryon Acoustic Oscillations are a a harmonic oscillator equation. This fact, together phenomenon occurred before matter-radiation with some approximate solutions will make easier to decoupling, characterized because the baryonic matter understand its physical interpretation. Software perturbation presents oscillations, as the name suggests. CAMB was used to complement the investigation of These perturbations propagate like a pressure wave on baryon acoustic oscillations phenomenon through the photon-baryon fluid produced by gravitational potentials, which join the baryonic matter, and analysis of simulations and graphics. collisions of baryons and photons, which scatter it. This paper shows the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations equation II. COSMOLOGICAL and it provides its physical meaning. Besides, it PERTURBATIONS presents software CAMB as a tool to find BAO equation solutions and support for its physical The universe must contain inhomogeneities that description. explain grouping of matter, like galaxies clusters (figure 1). These inhomogeneities occurs on an Key Word —Acoustic oscillations, baryons, cosmological idealized universe, thus, it is convenient first to perturbations, Newtonian gauge. discuss about the ideal universe. I. INTRODUCTION First models about universe appeared few years after Albert Einstein published his General Relativity Theory. They described an isotropic and homogeneous expanding universe. However, since the universe contains inhomogeneities, which are the cause of great structures formation, it was necessary to develop a Cosmological Perturbation Theory.
  • Reionization and Dark Matter Decay Parameters Used in the MCMC Analysis

    Reionization and Dark Matter Decay Parameters Used in the MCMC Analysis

    Prepared for submission to JCAP Reionization and dark matter decay Isabel M. Oldengott, Daniel Boriero and Dominik J. Schwarz Fakult¨at f¨ur Physik, Bielefeld University, D–33501 Bielefeld, Germany E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Cosmic reionization and dark matter decay can impact observations of the cosmic microwave sky in a similar way. A simultaneous study of both effects is required to constrain unstable dark matter from cosmic microwave background observations. We compare two reionization models with and without dark matter decay. We find that a reionization model that fits also data from quasars and star forming galaxies results in tighter constraints on the reionization optical depth τreio, but weaker constraints on the spectral index ns than the conventional parametrization. We use the Planck 2015 data to constrain the effective decay rate of dark matter to Γ < 2.9 10 25/s at 95% C.L. This limit is robust and model eff × − independent. It holds for any type of decaying dark matter and it depends only weakly on the chosen parametrization of astrophysical reionization. For light dark matter particles that decay exclusively into electromagnetic components this implies a limit of Γ < 5.3 10 26/s at × − 95% C.L. Specifying the decay channels, we apply our result to the case of keV-mass sterile neutrinos as dark matter candidates and obtain constraints on their mixing angle and mass, which are comparable to the ones from the diffuse X-ray background.
  • 1 Electron-Proton Decoupling in Excited State Hydrogen Atom

    1 Electron-Proton Decoupling in Excited State Hydrogen Atom

    Electron-Proton Decoupling in Excited State Hydrogen Atom Transfer in the Gas Phase Mitsuhiko Miyazaki1, Ryuhei Ohara1, Kota Daigoku2, Kenro Hashimoto3, Jonathan R. Woodward4, Claude Dedonder5, Christophe Jouvet*5 and Masaaki Fujii*1 1 Chemical Resources Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259-R1-15, Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan 2 Division of Chemistry, Center for Natural Sciences, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitazato, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 228-8555 Japan 3 Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan 4 Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan. 5 CNRS, Aix Marseille Université, Physique des Interactions Ioniques et Moleculaires (PIIM) UMR 7345, 13397 Marseille cedex, France Corresponding authors Masaaki Fujii: [email protected]; Christophe Jouvet: [email protected] TOC Do the hydrogen nucleus (proton) and electron move together or sequentially in the excited state hydrogen transfer (ESHT)? We answer this question by observing time-resolved spectroscopic changes that can distinguish between the electron and proton movements in a molecular cluster of phenol solvated by 5 ammonia molecules. The measurement demonstrates for the first time that the electron moves first and the proton then follows on a much slower timescale. 1 Abstract Hydrogen-release by photoexcitation, called excited-state-hydrogen-transfer (ESHT), is one of the important photochemical processes that occur in aromatic acids. It is responsible for photoprotection of biomolecules, such as nuclei acids. Theoretically the mechanism is described by conversion of the initial state to a charge-separated state along the elongation of O(N)-H bond leading to dissociation.
  • Recombination and the Cosmic Microwave Background

    Recombination and the Cosmic Microwave Background

    M. Pettini: Introduction to Cosmology | Lecture 9 RECOMBINATION AND THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND Once Big Bang Nucleosynthesis is over, at time t ∼ 300 s and tempera- ture T ∼ 8 × 108 K, the Universe is a thermal bath of photons, protons, helium nuclei, traces of other light elements, and electrons, in addition to neutrinos and the unknown dark matter particle(s). The energy density is dominated by the relativistic component, photons and neutrinos. With the exception of neutrinos and the dark matter which by this time have decoupled from the plasma, all particle species have the same temperature which is established by interactions of charged particles with the photons. Photons interacted primarily with electrons through Thomson scattering: γ + e− ! γ + e− i.e. the elastic scattering of electromagnetic radiation by a free charged particle. Thomson scattering is the low-energy limit of Compton scattering and is a valid description in the regime where the photon energy is much less than the rest-mass energy of the electron. In this process, the electron can be thought of as being made to oscillate in the electromagnetic field of the photon causing it, in turn, to emit radiation at the same frequency as the incident wave, and thus the wave is scattered. An important feature of Thomson scattering is that it introduces polarization along the direction of motion of the electron (see Figure 9.1). The cross-section for Thomson scattering is tiny: 2 2 1 e −25 2 σT = 2 2 = 6:6 × 10 cm (9.1) 6π0 mec and therefore Thomson scattering is most important when the density of free electrons is high, as in the early Universe or in the dense interiors of stars.1 1 Photons are also scattered by free protons, but σT for proton scattering is smaller by a factor 2 (me=mp) (eq.
  • Class 16 : the Cosmic Microwave Background

    Class 16 : the Cosmic Microwave Background

    Class 16 : The Cosmic Microwave Background This class Discovery of the CMB Basic properties of the CMB Epoch of recombination and decoupling CMB anisotropies I : The discovery of the cosmic microwave background Penzias & Wilson (Bell-Labs) 1 Arno Penzias & Robert Wilson (1964) Were attempting to study radio emissions from our Galaxy using sensitive antenna built at Bell-Labs Needed to characterize and eliminate all sources of noise They never could get rid of a certain noise source… noise had a characteristic temperature of about 3 K. They figured out that the noise was coming from the sky, and was approximately the same in all directions They had discovered the “relic radiation” of the hot big bang! (Nobel Prize in Physics in 1978) COBE Satellite 2 II : Basic properties of the CMB The CMB today… Almost perfect blackbody spectrum, T=2.725K 3.7x108 photons/m3 (c.f. about 0.22 proton/m3) Photon/baryon ratio, 1.7×109 ε=4.17x10-14 J/m3 ; ε/c2=4.63x10-31 kg/m3 -5 -2 Ωrad=2.46x10 h How has CMB evolved as Universe expanded? Energy density in a black body is Recalling that ε~a-4, we have T~a-1, and hence -4 4 -3 3 Since εrad~a ~(1+z) and ρmat~a ~(1+z) , we have -4 -2 Today, we have Ωrad/ΩM≈10 h … so matter and radiation have equal energy density at In fact, accounting for relativistic neutrinos (which behave like radiation in some ways), the true cross- over between radiation and matter occurs at z~3200.
  • Astrophysics in a Nutshell, Second Edition

    Astrophysics in a Nutshell, Second Edition

    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. 10 Tests and Probes of Big Bang Cosmology In this final chapter, we review three experimental predictions of the cosmological model that we developed in chapter 9, and their observational verification. The tests are cosmo- logical redshift (in the context of distances to type-Ia supernovae, and baryon acoustic oscillations), the cosmic microwave background, and nucleosynthesis of the light ele- ments. Each of these tests also provides information on the particular parameters that describe our Universe. We conclude with a brief discussion on the use of quasars and other distant objects as cosmological probes. 10.1 Cosmological Redshift and Hubble's Law Consider light from a galaxy at a comoving radial coordinate re. Two wavefronts, emitted at times te and te + te, arrive at Earth at times t0 and t0 + t0, respectively. As already noted in chapter 4.5 in the context of black holes, the metric of spacetime dictates the trajectories of particles and radiation. Light, in particular, follows a null geodesic with ds = 0. Thus, for a photon propagating in the FLRW metric (see also chapter 9, Problems 1–3), we can write dr2 0 = c2dt2 − R(t)2 . (10.1) 1 − kr2 The first wavefront therefore obeys t0 dt 1 re dr = √ , (10.2) − 2 te R(t) c 0 1 kr and the second wavefront + t0 t0 dt 1 re dr = √ . (10.3) − 2 te+ te R(t) c 0 1 kr For general queries, contact [email protected] © Copyright, Princeton University Press.