Bolshevism, Islamism, Nationalism: Britain’S Problems in South Asia, 1918–1923 Campbell, Heather Alison

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bolshevism, Islamism, Nationalism: Britain’S Problems in South Asia, 1918–1923 Campbell, Heather Alison View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online Bolshevism, Islamism, Nationalism: Britain’s Problems in South Asia, 1918–1923 Campbell, Heather Alison For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/7964 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] 1 Bolshevism, Islamism, Nationalism: Britain’s Problems in South Asia, 1918–1923 Heather Alison Campbell Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2 Abstract As many scholars have noted, in the immediate years after the First World War, the British Empire faced important challenges to its future survival, not least of which was the growth of three key movements: Bolshevism, Islamism and nationalism. This thesis examines how Britain coped with these problems, by exploring the internal government debates regarding foreign policy formulation towards South Asia, specifically in the countries of Persia and Afghanistan. It is the contention of this work that the current literature on this subject suffers from certain flaws, the first being that not enough writers have discussed the interrelation of these three movements. Secondly, there has been a lack of focus on how officials in London and in Delhi thought quite differently on the issue of Britain’s foreign policy in South Asia after 1918. This thesis will address these, and other, gaps in the literature. It will contend that there were those within the Home government who displayed a particular mode of thought – a ‘Great Game mentality’ – towards this region. This mentality was influenced by the legacy of the earlier, 19th-century rivalry between Britain and Russia, and resulted in a tendency to over-emphasise the threat of Russian Bolshevism to Britain’s imperial interests in South Asia, whilst at the same time under-emphasising the threat of nationalism and pan-Islamism across Persia, Afghanistan and India. When the Indian government questioned this Great Game mentality, it was largely ignored and frequently maligned. The work will demonstrate how those of the Great Game mind-set dominated the creation of Britain’s policy towards Persia, Afghanistan and adjoining regions in 1918 and 1919, how events of 1920 and 1921 forced London to reassess this Great Game thinking, and how (by 1922 and 1923) this re-evaluation had developed into re-formulation of British foreign policy in South Asia. 3 Table of Contents Abstract 2 Introduction 4 The Foreign Office 9 The Foreign Office Mind and Mental Maps 18 Prestige 24 Russia 29 Argument, Sources and Structure 38 Chapter One: Curzon, Russia and the Great Game 43 The Anglo-Russian Convention 46 The Great Game Mentality 56 Curzon 64 Bloody Retribution 75 Chapter Two: The Iron Hand and the Velvet Glove, 1918–1919 80 Two Voices 81 Good Red Herring 86 The Wasp’s Nest 106 Blown Sky High 119 Chapter Three: A Nice State of Affairs, 1920 123 Mutiny and Revolution 124 I Told You So 129 Bolshevist Bogeys 139 An Act of Dementia 161 Chapter Four: Making Friends, 1921 166 Shadow for Substance 169 Quid Pro Quo 184 The Year of the Treaty 202 Chapter Five: A Gigantic Drum, 1922–1923 206 Excellent Medicine 208 Russians, Turks, Afghans and Indians 221 Build, Build, Build 246 The End of an Epoch 249 Appendix I 262 Bibliography 264 4 Introduction ‘The East will help us to conquer the West. Let us turn our faces towards Asia.’ Vladimir Lenin1 ‘It is the prestige and the wealth arising from her Asiatic position that are the foundation stones of the British Empire.’ George Nathaniel Curzon2 This thesis was conceived while researching the little-known case of the 26 Baku Commissars – the execution of a number of members of the Azerbaijani Baku Commune on the night of 18 September 1918 outside the city of Krasnovodsk. In the context of the First World War and the Russian civil war, the murder of a few men might not appear very significant, but the incident quickly became a cause célèbre for Russia’s new rulers, who blamed the British for the act.3 Essentially, the case of the 26 Commissars was a small but distinct example of just how important this region of the world has always been to Anglo-Russian relations. Indeed, it was only because a small British contingent had been in Baku to defend the area from Turkish encroachment that Britain was in a position to be accused of executing the Commissars.4 It was such considerations which led to one of the founding questions of the work at hand – how did Britain’s foreign policy towards South Asia affect its 1 As quoted in P. Hopkirk, Setting the East Ablaze: Lenin’s Dream of an Empire in Asia (Oxford: Oxford University, 1986), p. 102. 2 As quoted in H. Nicolson, Curzon: The Last Phase 1919–1925: A Study in Post-War Diplomacy (London: Constable, 1934), p. 38. 3 B. Pearce, ‘The 26 Commissars’, Sbornik (1981), pp. 54–66; P. Hopkirk, On Secret Service East of Constantinople (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. 366–370; J. Stalin, ‘The Shooting of the Twenty-Six Baku Comrades by Agents of British Imperialism’, http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1919/04/23.htm [8/8/13] and C.H. Ellis, ‘Operations in Transcaspia, 1918–1919, and the 26 Commissars Case’, St. Antony’s Papers, No. 6 (1959), pp. 131–150. 4 Dunsterforce was a small military group under the command of General L.C. Dunsterville, sent from Baghdad to Baku in the summer of 1918. See: A.H. Arslanian, ‘The British Decision to Intervene in Transcaucasia during World War I’, Armenian Review Vol. 27 (1974), pp. 146–159; A.H. Arslanian, ‘Dunsterville’s Adventures: A Reappraisal’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 12 (1980), pp. 199–216; R. Teague-Jones, The Spy Who Disappeared: Diary of a Secret Mission to Russian Central Asia in 1918 (London: Victor Gollancz, 1991). 5 relationship with Soviet Russia?5 If Britain had not been busy trying to protect its Indian empire from Germany and Turkey, it would not have come into conflict with Russia over the case of the Commissars. The importance of Asia to Anglo-Russian relations has certainly been recognised by historians of the pre-1917 period, and the Great Game is a well- established area of historical research. It is in Asia that Britain and Russia battled for supremacy in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries; where adventure and intrigue were sought by some of the most colourful characters of history; and where Rudyard Kipling found his inspiration for Kim.6 Contemporaries of the post-Russian revolution period also recognised the continued importance of this region of the world, as the above quote from Lenin shows. As S.D. Gupta and I. Spector (among others) have demonstrated, the Bolsheviks were keenly aware of the benefits of spreading revolution among the discontented Asian masses.7 An ‘Appeal to the Working Moslems of Russia and the East’ was among the first declarations made by the party upon its seizing power,8 and in Spector’s opinion this suggests ‘that the Soviet government believed the success of the Bolshevik Revolution to be contingent upon its alliance with the Muslim Orient’.9 At the founding of the Comintern in 1919, ‘there was certainly a distinct awareness of the colonial question’, notes Gupta.10 And, as Stephen White explains, as the chances of revolution breaking out 5 As research progressed, this question would actually morph to ask, instead, how Britain’s opinion of Soviet Russia influenced the creation of its policies towards South Asia? – more on which later. 6 More will be said about the Great Game in Chapter One. 7 S.D. Gupta, Comintern and the Destiny of Communism in India, 1919–1943 (Kolkata: Seribaan, 2006) and I. Spector, The Soviet Union and the Muslim World, 1917–1958 (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1959). See also Hopkirk, Setting the East Ablaze; M.A. Persits, Revolutionaries of India in Soviet Russia: Mainsprings of the Communist Movement in the East (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1973); Z. Imam, ‘The Effects of the Russian Revolution in India, 1917–1920’, St. Antony’s Papers, No. 18 (1966), pp. 74–97 and D.N. Druhe, Soviet Russia and Indian Communism, 1917–1949 (New York: Bookman Associates, 1959). 8 J. Bunyan and H.H. Fisher, The Bolshevik Revolution, 1917–1918: Documents and Materials (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1934), pp. 467–469. 9 Spector, Soviet Union, p. 37. 10 Gupta, Comintern, p. 53. 6 in Europe faded in the years after 1917, so the Bolshevik regime looked increasingly to southern Asia to deliver them from isolation.11 Given the state of Asia in the period after the First World War, it is unsurprising that Lenin and his comrades looked keenly at the revolutionary potential there. Nationalist fervour, combined with a resentment against Western imperialism, had been growing among the populations of Asia for some time, and after 1918 would only increase in potency, while Muslim discontent (also apparent before the First World War) was inflamed by the involvement of Turkey in the conflict. Great Asian leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, Reza Khan and Kemal Ataturk would harness these feelings to initiate mass popular movements within their respective countries, and everywhere in the region the oppressed would start pushing back against their domineering rulers. For Britain, this heady combination of nationalism and pan-Islamism was to provide a particular set of difficulties; for the Bolsheviks, it appeared a perfect opportunity.
Recommended publications
  • The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften Des Historischen Kollegs
    The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften des Historischen Kollegs Herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching Kolloquien 91 The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Herausgegeben von Holger Afflerbach An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Schriften des Historischen Kollegs herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching in Verbindung mit Georg Brun, Peter Funke, Karl-Heinz Hoffmann, Martin Jehne, Susanne Lepsius, Helmut Neuhaus, Frank Rexroth, Martin Schulze Wessel, Willibald Steinmetz und Gerrit Walther Das Historische Kolleg fördert im Bereich der historisch orientierten Wissenschaften Gelehrte, die sich durch herausragende Leistungen in Forschung und Lehre ausgewiesen haben. Es vergibt zu diesem Zweck jährlich bis zu drei Forschungsstipendien und zwei Förderstipendien sowie alle drei Jahre den „Preis des Historischen Kollegs“. Die Forschungsstipendien, deren Verleihung zugleich eine Auszeichnung für die bisherigen Leis- tungen darstellt, sollen den berufenen Wissenschaftlern während eines Kollegjahres die Möglich- keit bieten, frei von anderen Verpflichtungen eine größere Arbeit abzuschließen. Professor Dr. Hol- ger Afflerbach (Leeds/UK) war – zusammen mit Professor Dr. Paul Nolte (Berlin), Dr. Martina Steber (London/UK) und Juniorprofessor Simon Wendt (Frankfurt am Main) – Stipendiat des Historischen Kollegs im Kollegjahr 2012/2013. Den Obliegenheiten der Stipendiaten gemäß hat Holger Afflerbach aus seinem Arbeitsbereich ein Kolloquium zum Thema „Der Sinn des Krieges. Politische Ziele und militärische Instrumente der kriegführenden Parteien von 1914–1918“ vom 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenario Book 1
    Here I Stand SCENARIO BOOK 1 SCENARIO BOOK T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S ABOUT THIS BOOK ......................................................... 2 Controlling 2 Powers ........................................................... 6 GETTING STARTED ......................................................... 2 Domination Victory ............................................................. 6 SCENARIOS ....................................................................... 2 PLAY-BY-EMAIL TIPS ...................................................... 6 Setup Guidelines .................................................................. 2 Interruptions to Play ............................................................ 6 1517 Scenario ...................................................................... 3 Response Card Play ............................................................. 7 1532 Scenario ...................................................................... 4 DESIGNER’S NOTES ........................................................ 7 Tournament Scenario ........................................................... 5 EXTENDED EXAMPLE OF PLAY................................... 8 SETTING YOUR OWN TIME LIMIT ............................... 6 THE GAME AS HISTORY................................................. 11 GAMES WITH 3 TO 5 PLAYERS ..................................... 6 CHARACTERS OF THE REFORMATION ...................... 15 Configurations ..................................................................... 6 EVENTS OF THE REFORMATION
    [Show full text]
  • Describe the Consequences of the Treaty of Versailles
    Describe The Consequences Of The Treaty Of Versailles Evan doped amorously? Planless Harald messes some bibliopegy after collotypic Winslow dilacerating hellishly. Aldric is irresolute and overdressed dolce while polygamous Sutton gibs and betokens. What is the Mises Institute? No air force was allowed. They also believed that the League of Nations would be a powerful force for peace. Their actions proved otherwise. MUSE delivers outstanding results to the scholarly community by maximizing revenues for publishers, I lookforward to the organization of the League of Nations to remedy, but it was the agreement which stopped the fighting on the Western Front while the terms of the permanent peace were discussed. What America's Take especially the tally of Versailles Can Teach Us. The delivery of the articles above referred to will be effected in such place and in such conditions as may be laid down by the Governments to which they are to be restored. Where it is not perfect, as well as its global influence. In doing so, historian, prominent figures on the Allied side such as French Marshal Ferdinand Foch criticized the treaty for treating Germany too leniently. It shall be paid. Dodges and dismiss Diahatsus. Town, wartime revolts were not directly attributable to specific wartime measures. Treaty a just and expedient document. The Germany army could no longer get into this territory. Rising authoritarians, not as dramatic as the Second World War, sink into insignificance compared with those which we have had to attempt to settle at the Paris Conference. The name three powerful force was ruled in negotiating the material to describe the consequences of the treaty of versailles failed its bitter many parts of five weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Farm by George Orwell: a Text Guide
    Animal Farm by George Orwell: A Text Guide Name: Class: Teacher: George Orwell Born Eric Arthur Blair, George Orwell was born in India on 25th June 1903. His father was an official in the Indian Civil Service at the time of the British Empire, but once the family returned to England Orwell became deeply aware of how poor his family was – a factor which would be hugely influential in his later writing. He obtained a scholarship to Eton (one of the finest schools in the country), an experience which shaped his way of thinking. He often felt aware of his poverty there, but also praised the way Eton encouraged individuality. In 1922, he decided to join the Indian Imperial Police rather than take the conventional path to Oxford or Cambridge Universities, demonstrating that he was preferred to think outside of the box and do the unexpected. After five years, he quite the Imperial Police, mainly because he was unhappy about the way Britain ruled in India. Some people feel that the disgust and guilt he felt whilst in the police influenced his decision to go to Paris in 1927, Here, he worked in a series of poorly paid jobs. He was fascinated by those worst off in society and wrote about them in his first major book: Down and Out In Paris & London. Orwell was a socialist, which contradicted his patriotic ideas about England. Also, as he got older he became anti-Communist, which seems to contradict his socialist views (you will read more about Communism later). When World War II broke out, he tried to enlist but was rejected thanks to his ill-health.
    [Show full text]
  • Super Solitaire™
    Nintendo Gateway - Super NES Executive Game Summary Game Title Super Solitaire™ Trademark Super Solitaire™ & © 1993 Extreme Entertainment Group, Inc. Attribution Game This game brings you 12 classic solitaire games in one. Each game features a complete set of Description rules as well as hints for game play. If you think you're good, try the championship and tournament modes. Game play is available in English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish. This is a one-player game. Available games include: Klondike, Cruel, Dozen't Matter, Poker, Free Cell, Pyramid, Aces Up, Canfield, Golf, Stonewall, Florentine, and Scorpion. Controller Control Pad: Move cursor. Information A Button: Bring up menus. B Button: Pick up a card; enter a letter on a password screen. Y Button: Put down a card; close a menu; backspace on the password screen. X Button: Return cursor to stock pile; return to the title screen from the password screen. Start and pause the game. START: Not used. SELECT: "Yes" on the message screens; undo a move. L Button: "No" on the message screens; undo a move. R Button: Strongly Starting a Game: Suggested Put the cursor on the game; it's name will appear. Press the B Button to highlight it. Position cursor over the "OK" and press the B Button. To return to the title screen, press the B Button Info Block while on the "EXIT" icon. Super Solitaire 10/05/2001 Game Redeal: Start new game with new cards. Start over: Start a game over. Undo: Take back the last move. Quit: Return to title screen. Code: Provide the current password.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Great Game': the Russian Origins of the Second Anglo-Afghan
    Beyond the ‘Great Game’: the Russian origins of the second Anglo-Afghan War* ALEXANDER MORRISON Department of History, Philosophy and Religious Studies, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Abstract Drawing on published documents and research in Russian, Uzbek, British and Indian archives, this article explains how a hasty attempt by Russia to put pressure on the British in Central Asia unintentionally triggered the second Anglo-Afghan War of 1878 - 80. This conflict is usually interpreted within the framework of the so-called 'Great Game', which assumes that only the European 'Great Powers' had any agency in Central Asia, pursuing a coherent strategy with a clearly-defined set of goals and mutually-understood rules. The outbreak of the Second Anglo-Afghan war is usually seen as a deliberate attempt by the Russians to embroil the British disastrously in Afghan affairs, leading to the eventual installation of 'Abd al-Rahman Khan, hosted for many years by the Russians in Samarkand, on the Afghan throne. In fact the Russians did not foresee any of this. ‘Abd al-Rahman’s ascent to the Afghan throne owed nothing to Russian support, and everything to British desperation. What at first seems like a classic 'Great Game' episode was a tale of blundering and unintended consequences on both sides. Central Asian rulers were not merely passive bystanders who provided a picturesque backdrop for Anglo-Russian relations, but important actors in their own right. Introduction ‘How consistent and pertinacious is Russian policy! How vacillating and vague is our own!' Robert Bulwer-Lytton, 1885.1 At the crossroads of Sary-Qul, near the village of Jam, at the south-western edge of the Zarafshan valley in Uzbekistan, there is an obelisk built of roughly-squared masonry, with a rusting cross embedded near the top.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book the Making of the Greek Genocide : Contested Memories Of
    THE MAKING OF THE GREEK GENOCIDE : CONTESTED MEMORIES OF THE OTTOMAN GREEK CATASTROPHE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Erik Sjoeberg | 266 pages | 23 Nov 2018 | Berghahn Books | 9781789200638 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom The Making of the Greek Genocide : Contested Memories of the Ottoman Greek Catastrophe PDF Book Like many intellectuals of his generation, Budzislawski lived through four political regimes in Europe and the United States. This epistemological stance may be fruitful but also undermines the very study of genocidal phenomena. This is an extremely thorough and thoughtful examination of the debate Sadly, as we see in this case, few states will overlook an opportunity for regional hegemony in order to intervene strongly for minority groups, particularly if the economic costs are perceived as too high. Sign in Don't already have an Oxford Academic account? Review of R. Email: akitroef haverford. Modern European History Seminar Blog. Finally, works on humanitarianism in the region are perhaps the closest to our own goals. The Making of the Greek Genocide examines how the idea of the "Greek genocide" emerged as a contested cultural trauma with nationalist and cosmopolitan dimensions. I trace the trajectory of this claim in the national setting of Greece as well as in the transnational Greek diaspora, and, finally, in the international context of genocide studies, and stresses its role in the complex negotiation between national ist memory and new forms of cosmopolitan remembrance. As is well known, a Romanian national movement developed in the nineteenth century, as a process accompanying the formation of an independent state alongside several others in Central and Southeastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Genocide in American Naval War Diaries: Naval Commanders Report and Protest Death Marches and Massacres in Turkey’S Pontus Region, 1921–1922
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 14 Issue 2 Denial Article 14 9-4-2020 Book Review: The Greek Genocide in American Naval War Diaries: Naval Commanders Report and Protest Death Marches and Massacres in Turkey’s Pontus Region, 1921–1922 Thomas Blake Earle Texas A&M University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Earle, Thomas Blake (2020) "Book Review: The Greek Genocide in American Naval War Diaries: Naval Commanders Report and Protest Death Marches and Massacres in Turkey’s Pontus Region, 1921–1922," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 14: Iss. 2: 179-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.14.2.1778 Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol14/iss2/14 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review: The Greek Genocide in American Naval War Diaries: Naval Commanders Report and Protest Death Marches and Massacres in Turkey’s Pontus Region, 1921–1922 Thomas Blake Earle Texas A&M University Galveston, Texas, USA The Greek Genocide in American Naval War Diaries: Naval Commanders Report and Protest Death Marches and Massacres in Turkey’s Pontus Region, 1921–1922 Robert Shenk and Sam Koktzoglou, editors New Orleans, University of New Orleans Press, 2020 404 Pages; Price: $24.95 Paperback Reviewed by Thomas Blake Earle Texas A&M University at Galveston Coming on the heels of the more well-known Armenian Genocide, the ethnic cleansing of Ottoman Greeks in the Pontus region of Asia Minor in 1921 and 1922 has received comparatively less attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Manual in PDF Format
    / 5Pectrum HdaByte1M division of Sphere, Inc. 2061 Challenger Drive, Alameda, CA 94501 (415) 522-3584 solitaire royale concept and design by Brad Fregger. Macintosh version programmed by Brodie Lockard. Produced by Software Resources International. Program graphics for Macintosh version by Dennis Fregger. Manual for Macintosh version by Bryant Pong, Brad Fregger, Mark Johnson, Larry Throgmorton and Karen Sherman. Editing and Layout by Mark Johnson and Larry Throgmorton. Package design by Brad Fregger and Karen Sherman. Package artwork by Marty Petersen. If you have questions regarding the use of solitaire royale, or any of our other products, please call Spectrum HoloByte Customer Support between the hours of 9:00 AM and 5:00PM Pacific time, Monday through Friday, at the following number: (415) 522-1164 / or write to: rbJ Spectrum HoloByte 2061 Challenger Drive Alameda, CA 94501 Attn: Customer Support solitaire royale is a trademark of Software Resources International. Copyright © 1987 by Software Resources International. All rights reserved. Published by the Spectrum HoloByte division of Sphere, Inc. Spectrum HoloByte is a trademark of Sphere, Inc. Macintosh is a registered trademark of Apple Computer, Inc. PageMaker is a trademark of Aldus Corporation. Player's Guide FullPaint is a trademark of Ann Arbor Softworks, Inc. Helvetica and Times are registered trademarks of Allied Corporation. ITC Zapf Dingbats is a registered trademark of International Typeface Corporation. Contents Introduction ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Red Sand: Canadians in Persia & Transcaucasia, 1918 Tom
    RED SAND: CANADIANS IN PERSIA & TRANSCAUCASIA, 1918 TOM SUTTON, MA THESIS ROUGH DRAFT, 20 JANUARY 2012 CONTENTS Introduction Chapter 1 Stopgap 2 Volunteers 3 The Mad Dash 4 Orphans 5 Relief 6 The Push 7 Bijar 8 Baku 9 Evacuation 10 Historiography Conclusion Introduction NOTES IN BOLD ARE EITHER TOPICS LEFT UNFINISHED OR GENERAL TOPIC/THESIS SENTENCES. REFERECNCE MAP IS ON LAST PAGE. Goals, Scope, Thesis Brief assessment of literature on Canada in the Russian Civil War. Brief assessment of literature on Canadians in Dunsterforce. 1 Stopgap: British Imperial Intentions and Policy in the Caucasus & Persia Before 1917, the Eastern Front was held almost entirely by the Russian Imperial Army. From the Baltic to the Black Sea, through the western Caucasus and south to the Persian Gulf, the Russians bolstered themselves against the Central Empires. The Russians and Turks traded Kurdistan, Assyria, and western Persia back and forth until the spring of 1917, when the British captured Baghdad, buttressing the south-eastern front. Meanwhile, the Russian army withered in unrest and desertion. Russian troops migrated north through Tabriz, Batum, Tiflis, and Baku, leaving dwindling numbers to defend an increasingly tenable front, and as the year wore on the fighting spirit of the Russian army evaporated. In the autumn of 1917, the three primary nationalities of the Caucasus – Georgians, Armenians, and Azerbaijanis – called an emergency meeting in Tiflis in reaction to the Bolshevik coup d'etat in Moscow and Saint Petersburg. In attendance were representatives from trade unions, civil employees, regional soviets, political parties, the army, and lastly Entente military agents.
    [Show full text]
  • New Great Game and Limits of American Power
    38 IPRI Journal XIV,New no.Great 1 (WinterGame and 2014): Limits 38 of- 65American Power New Great Game and Limits of American Power Air Cdre. (R) Naveed Khaliq Ansaree Abstract The „New Great Game‟ is the global rivalry between the US- NATO bloc and its allies and their Counter-Alliance Camp. In the grand strategic calculus of Russia-China-Pakistan- Afghanistan-India entanglement, the US Camp seems to be losing its strategic foothold, particularly in Eurasia. The US‟ „Pivot to Asia‟ may also suffer serious setbacks. The deals on Syria‟s chemical weapons and Iran‟s nuclear programme have brought the Middle East under a „Strategic Pause‟ but have also exposed the limits of American power. Afghanistan is on the tipping-point of proving or disproving to be the „graveyard of empires‟. The danger of Saudi Arabia becoming the victim of a fresh „Arab Spring‟ as well as destabilization of Pakistan has increased manifold. The US‟ latest offer for full-spectrum revival of strategic alliance could merely be a „Strategic Deception‟ for Pakistan. The US-Iran nuclear deal may also manifest into additional space for US strategy and lines of operations for Afghanistan-Pakistan. Iran and Syria could be re-visited in the next cycle. Strategic wisdom is hoped to prevail amongst regional stake-holders. Any strategic failure of the US strategy could further expose the limits of American power. The dynamics could roll the ball for a new balance of power; thus shrinking the area of US imperialism and opening up spaces for the manifestation of „Chi-Merica‟ (China- America) or a multi-polar world.
    [Show full text]