Thursday Volume 498 29 October 2009 No. 133 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 29 October 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail:
[email protected] 421 29 OCTOBER 2009 422 House of Commons CANTERBURY CITY COUNCIL BILL Motion made, That the promoters of the Canterbury City Council Bill which Thursday 29 October 2009 was originally introduced in this House in the previous Session on 22 January 2008, should have leave to suspend any further proceedings on the Bill in order to proceed with it, if they think fit, in the next The House met at half-past Ten o’clock Session of Parliament according to the provisions of Private Business Standing Order 188A (Suspension of bills).—(The Second Deputy Chairman of Ways and Means.) PRAYERS Hon. Members: To be considered on Thursday 5 November. [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] LEEDS CITY COUNCIL BILL BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS Motion made, That the promoters of the Leeds City Council Bill which was CANTERBURY CITY COUNCIL BILL (BY ORDER) originally introduced in this House in the previous Session on Third Reading opposed and deferred until Thursday 22 January 2008, should have leave to suspend any further proceedings 5 November (Standing Order No. 20). on the Bill in order to proceed with it, if they think fit, in the next Session of Parliament according to the provisions of Private Business Standing Order 188A (Suspension of bills).—(The Second NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL BILL (BY ORDER) Deputy Chairman of Ways and Means.) Third Reading opposed and deferred until Thursday 5 November (Standing Order No.