DOCSLIB.ORG

Combined Authorities – the Next Big Thing?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Combined Authorities – the Next Big Thing? combined authorities – the next big thing? With newly directly elected mayors due to take up their roles at the head of Combined Authorities following elections in May, Janice Morphet considers the powers at their disposal and the possible impacts of the latest round of revolution in English local government In May 2017, another revolution in the way that dissolution and the creation of a new authority from England is governed at sub-national level will begin. 2019. Other approaches include county bids to Local government in the UK is in constant flux, with create unitary authorities for their areas or counter- recent changes implemented in Northern Ireland1 bids by district councils. and reform being mooted in Wales.2 In England, there have been changes introduced by central What are Combined Authorities? government that have fallen into two types of reform. Such bottom-up initiatives are framed within an The first is structural and top-down, such as the assumption, both by central and local government, creation of unitary authorities in a series of rounds,3 that they will gradually be adopted everywhere. a new governance model for London, and the Competitions for access to funds, the filling-in of abolition of the quasi-formal but not directly legal powers and peer-to-peer recommendations democratic structures at regional levels in 2009.4 between local authorities will all support these The second set of reforms are framed within shifts. Where there are two or three authorities central government policy but allow for the creation working together as in mergers or City Deals, then of new local governance structures within supposedly agreements are easier to map out, and benefits can locally determined and bottom-up approaches. be more readily identified and ascribed to participating These include the insertion of an active parish and parties. The introduction of the concept of Combined neighbourhood scale5 from 1999 onwards, so that Authorities (CAs) in the Local Democracy, Economic they now have the same powers as local authorities, Development and Construction Act 2009, and and the creation of Local Enterprise Partnerships later extended in the Cities and Local Government (LEPs) in 2010,6 which include local authorities but Devolution Act 2016,8 are a more challenging are not led by them in general. There are also other proposition. initiatives that are contractual in style, such as City CAs are an attempt to change democratic Deals7 – part bespoke but primarily menu-driven representation areas from existing administrative approaches for vertical integration of central and boundaries to those based on economic geographies.9 local government, pursuing a common agenda. This means, first, that ancient boundaries are no Another variation on this theme is the longer sacrosanct, and non-contiguous areas may encouragement by the former Communities and have strong cases to work together based on Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles for local evidence of journey-to-work or housing market authorities to merge in some way. A number are now areas. Secondly, these emergent changes serve to committed to this approach – such as Wandsworth destabilise the remaining system of county councils, and Richmond-upon-Thames, where there will be already undermined by the loss of education and one chief executive and a common set of officers transport powers. Thirdly, these new CAs are likely for the two London boroughs, although the to be long-standing; and choosing new working democratic management will remain separate. partners may mean moving away from existing Suffolk Coastal and Waveney, both district councils, relationships to work with bodies whose people, are taking this further through requesting their policies and culture are less familiar. 96 Town & Country Planning March 2017 Thomasaurus/Thinkstock Greater Manchester, perhaps the most high profile of the CAs, has long-established joint working arrangements On the other hand, the potential for devolution of governance with a strong and identifiable leader, decision-making and funding for transport, housing, then there is a clear and additional contribution to skills, business support, culture, energy and public national GDP. health are all attractive to local politicians. While This evidence has then led to the third major more power brings more accountability, the austerity stimulus to these reforms, which has been through squeeze in local government from 2010 onwards policy adoption. This policy-based research has a has meant that local authorities are desperate to reinforcing role in and of itself, but to this has been find new ways of working, and Combined added alignment with policy and legislation through Authorities may be adopted faute de mieux. individual states such as Australia, Canada and the US, but also through the EU. The OECD and the Why have Combined Authorities and directly EU together developed a new ‘city’ definition,13 elected mayors? and the EU then applied this through its sub-state Each of the newly formed CAs is established by programmes for cohesion. The legal framework for its own Parliamentary Order and has a directly the operation of sub-state programmes for social, elected mayor with their own set of powers. These economic and territorial ‘cohesion’ is the fourth powers are likely to increase over time, as they driver. Although better known in its former guise of have for the Mayor of London. First, though, a bit providing Structural Funds for lagging areas,14 the of backstory. Where have these ideas for aligning new cohesion approach is edge to edge and the economic boundaries with democratic leadership programme is being used to reinforce the operation come from? There are five main sources to of these new economic areas in practice, through a consider. programme of Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) The first is through research based on Krugman’s strategies.15 new theories of economic geography.10 These found The last driver for these reforms has come that state mercantile models of international trade through the United Nations’ new urban agenda, were now not the sole proponents of economic which is promoting the role of stronger mayoral growth, with trade between major economic areas governance for cities to address action on climate within countries being equally important. This view change and create more resilient places. This has was contested by Peck, Theodore and Brenner,11 also been reinforced through the EU’s Covenant of who argued that these new state spaces were Mayors.16 political constructions introduced to undermine existing administrative and political unities, particularly How are Combined Authorities progressing? based on regions. However, this view has been The roll-out of policy for CAs has been a slow countered by the second driver: research to find and bumpy ride. In part this has been because there more policy evidence. Much of this research has has been no clarity from central government on been undertaken by the OECD,12 which has shown policy objectives, even though the proposal has that where there is alignment between economic been espoused in much the same form by three geography and democratically accountable governments in a row – Labour from 2007 onwards, Town & Country Planning March 2017 97 the Coalition from 2010, and now Conservative from governance framework for that item, rather than 2015. The voluntary approaches established by having a series of separate meetings. the Labour Government were speeded up by the No other part of England apart from Teesside has creation of new approximate economic geographies had this type of continuity and pattern of working, through Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) in although some have a basis of joint working through 2010. Some of these new LEPs replicated old other initiatives, such as Greater Birmingham’s work county boundaries, but there were enough new on transport. formations to provide a platform for further reform. In other areas, such as in the former county of Each government has used mechanisms of Avon, joint working has never been as strong as incentivisation, outwardly based on local self- in Greater Manchester. The new West of England determination but managed centrally and, at times, Combined Authority is going ahead without North competitively between different government Somerset, one of the four former local authority departments concerned about powers and funding members of Avon. However, the West of England slipping away through devolution. The processes of initiative does demonstrate that CAs are not just negotiation have been opaque and have sometimes a consideration for urban areas. A CA was also appeared to be without leadership in Whitehall.17 proposed in Lincolnshire, but the proposal has LEPs have been a major mechanism for central subsequently fallen by the wayside in favour of a control at local level. Established outside local county-promoted unitary council. In East Anglia government, they have been steered by central there have been several different propositions for government with existing or former civil servant joint working, although only one has gone ahead, sponsors or board members managing the EU and for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. While this government budgets provided through growth and reunites the former county of Cambridgeshire as devolution deals. LEPs have never been formalised it was prior to 1998, when Peterborough was through legislation and have already gone beyond created as a unitary authority, it has taken
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why Devolution Matters: the Case of Cornwall Yth on Ni A’N Le Ma – We Are of This Place
    Institute for Public Policy Research WHY DEVOLUTION MATTERS: THE CASE OF CORNWALL YTH ON NI A’N LE MA – WE ARE OF THIS PLACE Sarah Longlands and Anna Round March 2021 Available at: www.ippr.org/publication/why-devolution-matters-the-case-of- cornwall INTRODUCTION From Covid-19 to Brexit to long term climate change, the complexity of the challenges the UK now faces means that the centralised system of government at Whitehall is no longer fit for purpose. Without a renewed commitment to devolution for all of the nations and regions which make up the UK, the government will fail to meet its promises to build back better and level up. More seriously still, we face the prospect of a disunited kingdom. The UK is one of the most economically divided countries in the developed world; it is also the most centralised (CEJ 2018, Raikes and Giovannini 2019, McCann 2019, UK2070 2020). This is not a coincidence. Research shows that where you live in the UK determines your ability to live a “good life” (Johns et al 2020). However, it has been the metro mayors, local government, civil society and business which have proved most agile and responsive to the challenges and impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic. Similarly, while central government may try to claim the credit, the recovery will be led by those same organisations. They know their communities best and are already deploying their limited resources, creativity and collaborative capital to rebuild local economies, support those who are out of work, and co-ordinate the recovery of people and place.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORT DELIVERY PLAN FEBRUARY 2021 Contents
    Draft Joint Local Transport Plan 4 2019-2036 January 2019 Section 11: TRANSPORT DELIVERYMajor schemes and summary of interventions continued PLAN Figure 11.1: JLTP4 major schemes N February 2021 Charfield Thornbury public realm and sustainable transport improvements improved junctions new junctions Yate improved road North Fringe new road smart motorway Avonmouth Portishead cycle routes Bristol improved rail station Clevedon new rail station rail improvements Nailsea Keynsham metrobus other bus route improvements Bristol Airport Bath mass transit expanded Park & Ride site new Park & Ride site Weston-super-Mare Midsomer Norton Alignments and locations are for illustrative purposes and subject to feasibility studies and consultation. 114 115 TRANSPORT DELIVERY PLAN FEBRUARY 2021 Contents Transport Delivery Plan 3 Infrastructure Delivery Programme 8 The challenge 3 Investing in and improving key routes 9 Covid-19 3 Sustainable transport corridors 9 Climate Change 4 Projects in delivery 10 Our priorities 5 Future Transport Zone 13 Objectives 5 Future Transport Zone goals 13 What do we want to achieve? 5 Strategies and plans 6 Climate Emergency Action Plan 6 Regional Economic Recovery Plan 6 Joint Local Transport Plan 4 6 Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan 6 Bus strategy 7 10 Year Rail Delivery Plan 7 2 TRANSPORT DELIVERY PLAN FEBRUARY 2021 Transport Delivery Plan This Transport Delivery Plan sets Our population is growing at a faster rate than out the currently funded transport other city regions, and so the strain on our transport network, housing supply and digital projects (2021 – 2026) that are infrastructure is growing. There remains a real progressing to delivery over the contrast between rich and poor, and residents next 5 years in the West of England don’t benefit equally from the success of our region.
    [Show full text]
  • Huw Jenkins, LCR Combined Authority
    SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OVERVIEW Huw Jenkins, Liverpool City Region Combined Authority LCR European Structural and Investment Fund (ESIF) Strategy • LCR awarded £193m to deliver ESIF Strategy • Covers: ERDF, ESF and Rural Development • All calls focused on delivery of agreed local priorities • DCLG manages the ESIF Programme: appraises project applications and awards offer letters ERDF Projects Overview PA 1 R&D/Innovation PA 3 SME Competitiveness PA 4 Transition to Low Carbon • Sensor City • Business Growth Programme • Low Carbon EcoInnovatory • LCR 4.0 • New Markets 2 • LCR Future Energy • Health Enterprise Innovation • The Enterprise Hub • NPIF Exchange • Specialist Manufacturing Service • Innovate2Succeed • Place Marketing for Investment • LCR Activate • SME/International Trade • SUD INVESTMENTS (PA 4 & PA6) • NPIF • Thermal Road • Baltic Creative (Norfolk St) • NPIF What is a SUD Strategy? • Part of LCR ERDF allocation • Government asked Core City Regions to develop SUD Strategies in 2015 • SUD strategies set out integrated actions to tackle challenges affecting urban areas • The Combined Authority will have a greater say in project selection as an Intermediary Body • The local ESIF Partnership Committee will continue to provide advice on local strategic fit to the Combined Authority and DCLG • DCLG appraises and issues contracts to successful projects as before Underpinning Strategies The following strategies have shaped the development of the LCR SUD Strategy: • European Structural and Investment Fund Strategy • LCR
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution Faqs
    FAQs What is devolution? Why would places want to have more powers and The Government is offering places in England the responsibilities from Government? chance to have greater responsibility and control over Places may want to have additional powers and decisions and spending in their region. responsibilities: • To focus spending on local priorities, and have more of This process of transferring powers and decisions a say over local taxation. which would usually be taken by central Government • To work together across services and use local to a more local level or regional level is called knowledge to get better value for money devolution. • To be more self-sufficient and have more responsibility for the future of the local are How do things currently work? • For decisions to be taken by locally elected politicians Currently, most spending decisions affecting York (and who better understand local issues, and can be held to other local areas) are made by central Government. account more easily Further, many of the taxes raised within York (and other local areas) flow back to central Government for Why is this important now? it to redistribute as it sees fit. A recent report showed The Government is actively offering places in England the that £1.5 billion is raised in taxes each year in York but chance to have greater responsibility and control over less than £150 million of this is available to the council decisions and spending in their region. Places have until the to spend on local services. 4th of September to “submit formal, fiscally neutral proposals and an agreed geography to the Treasury”.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool City Region Combined Authority End of Year Review 2020-2021 Pdf 447 Kb
    LIVERPOOL CITY REGION COMBINED AUTHORITY To: The Metro Mayor and Members of the Combined Authority Meeting: 4 June 2021 Authority/Authorities Affected: All EXEMPT/CONFIDENTIAL ITEM: No REPORT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE LIVERPOOL CITY REGION COMBINED AUTHORITY END OF YEAR REVIEW 2020- 2021 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this report is to highlight some of the achievements of the LCR Combined Authority during the 2020-21 municipal year. 2. RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 It is recommended that the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority: (a) agree the End of Year Review 2020-21; and (b) any amendments/insertions be made in consultation with the Metro Mayor and Chief Executive. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 The Liverpool City Region Combined Authority (LCRCA) is the Combined Authority for the Liverpool City Region, an area that covers the metropolitan county of Merseyside and the adjacent Borough of Halton. The Combined Authority was established on 1st April 2014 by statutory instrument under the provisions of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009. 3.2 The LCR Combined Authority is led by the directly elected Metro Mayor Steve Rotheram and brings together Liverpool City Region‟s six local authorities which are Halton Borough Council, Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council, Liverpool City Council, Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council, St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council and Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (“the six Constituent Authorities ”). In addition to the Metro Mayor, the membership of the Combined Authority also includes the Leaders of the five constituent Local Authorities, the elected Mayor of Liverpool City Council, the Chair of the Liverpool City Region Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP), Co-opted and Associate Members and designated Deputy Portfolio Holders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Combined Authorities (Mayors) (Filling of Vacancies) Order 2017
    EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE COMBINED AUTHORITIES (MAYORS) (FILLING OF VACANCIES) ORDER 2017 2017 No. 69 1. Introduction 1.1 This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Department for Communities and Local Government and is laid before Parliament by Command of Her Majesty. 2. Purpose of the instrument 2.1 This instrument makes essential provision in preparation for the introduction of directly elected mayors for combined authorities. The order provides the rules by which vacancies are to be declared in the office of Mayor, and the procedure by which these are to be filled through by-elections. 3. Matters of special interest to Parliament Matters of special interest to the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments 3.1 None. Other matters of interest to the House of Commons 3.2 These entire instruments apply only to England. 3.3 The instruments apply only to England as they are entirely concerned with the filling of vacancies in the office of a mayor for the area of a combined authority. Section 103(2) of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009) (the 2009 Act) provides that a combined authority may be established in relation to local government areas in England. The instrument does not give rise to minor or consequential effects outside England. 3.4 In the view of the Department, for the purposes of House of Commons Standing Order 83P, the subject-matter of this instrument would be within the devolved legislative competence of the Northern Ireland Assembly if equivalent provision in relation to Northern Ireland were included in an Act of the Northern Ireland Assembly as a transferred matter; or the Scottish Parliament if equivalent provision in relation to Scotland were included in an Act of the Scottish Parliament; or the National Assembly for Wales if equivalent provision in relation to Wales were included in an Act of the National Assembly for Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution: a Mayor for Greater Manchester. What Does It Mean?
    DEVOLUTION: A MAYOR FOR GREATER MANCHESTER. WHAT DOES IT MEAN? BOLTON | BURY | MANCHESTER | OLDHAM | ROCHDALE | SALFORD | STOCKPORT | TAMESIDE | TRAFFORD | WIGAN Devolution: A mayor for Greater Manchester. What does it mean? CONTENTS Introduction 3 How is the combined authority run? 4 What powers will the mayor and combined authority have? 6 What budgets will the mayor and combined authority have? 16 Annex A: Relevant legislation 27 Annex B: Useful words and phrases 29 2 Devolution: A mayor for Greater Manchester. What does it mean? INTRODUCTION In May 2017, there will be a major shift in the way we run our country. Powers, budgets and responsibilities will be passed down from central government to new directly-elected mayors in six regions across England, including in Greater Manchester. On Thursday 4 May, the residents of Bolton, Bury, Manchester, Oldham, Rochdale, Salford, Stockport, Tameside, Trafford, and Wigan will elect the first ever Mayor for Greater Manchester. The Mayor will represent Greater Manchester across the country and around the world. They will work with leaders of councils and businesses to create jobs, improve skills, build homes and make it easier to travel. The Mayor and the Greater Manchester Combined Authority will be able to: • invest in local priorities to improve Greater Manchester through an Investment Fund worth £900 million over 30 years; • keep more of the business rates that the councils collect from local businesses, to pay for local services; • set the rules for local bus services, including the routes,
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution Within Northern Ireland a Report for the Northern Ireland Local Government Association
    Devolution within Northern Ireland A report for the Northern Ireland Local Government Association June 2018 Peter Kenway and Issy Petrie Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 3 Introduction and focus ................................................................................................ 4 Public spending in Northern Ireland ........................................................................... 4 Spending at the local, devolved and UK government levels ................................... 4 What is the potential for local government in Northern Ireland? ............................. 6 Arguments for devolution ........................................................................................... 7 Why devolution: four arguments from the English debate ...................................... 7 Neighbourhood services and local government ....................................................... 10 Neighbourhood services ....................................................................................... 10 Responsibility for neighbourhood services in Northern Ireland ............................. 11 How far could devolution of neighbourhood services go? ..................................... 12 Devolving neighbourhood services: observations from Northern Ireland .............. 13 Other services and local governance ....................................................................... 15 Scotland’s Local Governance Review .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposition for Local Government Reorganisation in Lancashire
    Proposition for Local Government Reorganisation in Lancashire September 2020 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 2 1 Case for change and our proposal .......................................................................................................... 6 2 Driving economic recovery and levelling up ................................................................................... 14 3 Innovative delivery in health and social care ................................................................................. 21 4 Better community services ..................................................................................................................... 24 5 Principles of working ................................................................................................................................ 28 6 Next steps and how to take this forward .......................................................................................... 31 Appendix 1 – Economic snapshot .................................................................................................................. 33 1 Executive Summary 2 Executive Summary Current context and the emerging proposal Lancashire is a £30.8bn polycentric economy with 1.5m residents, 732,000 jobs and 53,000 businesses. The county has significant strengths in advanced manufacturing and engineering with innovation assets and major companies. But
    [Show full text]
  • Governing England: Devolution and Funding 1 Governing England: Devolution and Funding About Governing England
    Governing England: Devolution and funding 1 Governing England: Devolution and funding About Governing England Contents Foreword 2 Akash Paun About Governing England 3 1. Funding England: a review of the issues 4 Iain McLean 2. How England is funded 11 Martin Rogers and Alun Evans 3. Equalisation, incentives and discretion in English local public service provision 35 David Phillips 4. An exploration of the issues raised by the move towards to 100% Business Rate Retention 53 Aileen Murphie 5. Funding combined authorities and city regions 63 Tony Travers About the authors 72 Acknowledgements 73 2 Governing England: Devolution and funding Foreword By Akash Paun Foreword The British Academy’s Governing England programme was established in 2016 to explore questions about England’s governance, institutions and identity. One central focus of this work has been the English devolution agenda, looking at how successive governments have tried (occasionally successfully) to devolve power to England’s cities, towns and regions. During the course of the programme, the Academy has hosted a series of events across England, which have informed the production of two previous reports. The first, Governing England: Devolution and mayors in England (2017), examined the ‘devolution deals’ negotiated between central government and local authorities since 2015, leading to the election of ‘metro mayors’ in seven English city-regions. The second, Governing England: Devolution and public services (2018), investigated the impact (actual and potential) of devolution in three important areas of public policy: health and social care, skills, and infrastructure. A common theme emerging from this past work is that devolution cannot achieve its full potential as a mechanism for transforming the governance of England so long as the system for funding public services and local government remains unreformed and highly centralised.
    [Show full text]
  • Tees Valley Combined Authority Mayoral Election 6 May 2021
    This document was classified as: OFFICIAL TEES VALLEY COMBINED AUTHORITY MAYORAL ELECTION 6 MAY 2021 INFORMATION PACK FOR CANDIDATES AND AGENTS Contents 1. Submission of Nomination Papers 2. Overview 3. Covid Considerations 4. Contact Details 5. Candidate Addresses 6. Access to Electoral Register and other resources 7. Registration and Absent Voting 8. Agents 9. Spending Limits 10. Canvassing and Political Advertising 11. Verification and Count Overview 12. EC Guidance 13. Publication of Results 14. Declaration of Acceptance of Office 15. Term of Office 16. Briefings Appendix 1 – Contact Details for Council’s within the Tees Valley Appendix 2 – Election Timetable Appendix 3 – Candidate Contact Details Form Appendix 4 – Candidate Checklist Appendix 5 – Nomination Form Appendix 6 – Candidate’s Home Address Form Appendix 7– Consent to nomination Appendix 8 – Certificate of Authorisation (Party candidates only) Appendix 9 – Request for Party Emblem (Party candidates only) Appendix 10 – Notification of election agent Appendix 11 – Notification of sub-agent (optional) Appendix 12 – Candidates Deposits Form Appendix 13 – Notice of withdrawal Appendix 14 – Candidate’s Addresses Appendix 15 – Register Request Form Appendix 16 – Absent Voters Request Form Appendix 17 – Notification of postal voting agents, polling agents and counting agents Appendix 18 – Postal Vote Openings and Times Appendix 19 – Code of Conduct for Campaigners Appendix 20 – Declaration of Secrecy Appendix 21 – Polling Station Lists Appendix 22 – Verification and Count location plans Appendix 23 – Count Procedure and layout Appendix 24 – Thornaby Pavilion car parking Appendix 25 – Feedback Form J Danks Combined Authority Returning Office (CARO) 1 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL 1. Submission of Nomination Papers Candidates/ Agents are encouraged to email scanned nomination forms and supporting papers for informal checking at the earliest opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government in England: Structures
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 07104, 1 December 2017 Local government in By Mark Sandford England: structures Inside: 1. Local government structures 2. Functions of local government 3. Elections to local government 4. Boundary changes and restructuring 5. Local government finance 6. Structures: history www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 07104, 1 December 2017 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Local government structures 4 1.1 Local authorities in England 4 1.2 Fire and rescue authorities / Police and Crime Commissioners 4 1.3 Other authorities 5 2. Functions of local government 6 3. Elections to local government 7 3.1 Electoral systems and wards 7 3.2 Elections by halves and thirds 7 3.3 The franchise 8 3.4 Turnout 8 4. Boundary changes and restructuring 9 4.1 Becoming a unitary authority 9 4.2 Consent for structural change 9 4.3 District council mergers 10 4.4 Proposals for structural change 10 5. Local government finance 13 5.1 Sources of finance 13 Council tax 13 Business rates 13 Central government grants 13 Local fees and charges 13 5.2 The Local Government Finance Settlement 14 Funding included 14 Annual practice 14 6. Structures: history 16 6.1 Pre-1972 16 6.2 The 1972-74 reforms 16 6.3 Structural changes since 1972 17 Table: changes to local government structure in England since 1972 17 Appendix: functions of local authorities in England 18 Cover page image copyright: The Council Chamber by Tim Ellis. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped.
    [Show full text]