DOCSLIB.ORG

Unep/Cbd/Rw/Zieb/Sea/1/4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/RW/EBSA/SEA/1/4 29 April 2014* ORIGINAL: ENGLISH SOUTH-EASTERN ATLANTIC REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS Swakopmund, Namibia, 8 to 12 April 2013 REPORT OF THE SOUTH-EASTERN ATLANTIC REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS1 INTRODUCTION 1. At its tenth meeting, in decision X/29 (paragraph 36), the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity requested the Executive Secretary to work with Parties and other Governments as well as competent organizations and regional initiatives, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), regional seas conventions and action plans, and, where appropriate, regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs), with regard to fisheries management, to organize a series of regional workshops, with a primary objective to facilitate the description of ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs) through the application of scientific criteria in annex I of decision IX/20 as well as other relevant compatible and complementary nationally and intergovernmentally agreed scientific criteria, as well as the scientific guidance on the identification of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction, which meet the scientific criteria in annex I to decision IX/20. 2. In the same decision (paragraph 41), the Conference of the Parties requested that the Executive Secretary make available the scientific and technical data and information and results collated through the workshops referred to above to participating Parties, other Governments, intergovernmental agencies and the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) for their use according to their competencies. * Reposted on 29 April 2014 for technical reasons. 1 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this note do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. /... In order to minimize the environmental impacts of the Secretariat’s processes, and to contribute to the Secretary-General’s initiative for a C-Neutral UN, this document is printed in limited numbers. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UNEP/CBD/RW/EBSA/SEA/1/4 Page 2 3. The Conference of the Parties, at its tenth meeting, also requested the Executive Secretary, in collaboration with Parties and other Governments, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (UNDOALOS), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization–Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (UNESCO–IOC), in particular the Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS), and other competent organizations, the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) and the Global Ocean Biodiversity Initiative (GOBI), to establish a repository for scientific and technical information and experience related to the application of the scientific criteria on the identification of EBSAs in annex I of decision IX/20, as well as other relevant compatible and complementary nationally and intergovernmentally agreed scientific criteria, that shares information and harmonizes with similar initiatives, and to develop an information-sharing mechanism with similar initiatives, such as FAO’s work on vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs) (paragraph 39 of decision X/29). 4. Subsequently, at its eleventh meeting, the Conference of the Parties to the Convention requested the Executive Secretary to include the summary reports on the description of areas that meet the criteria for ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs), prepared by the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice at its sixteenth meeting and contained in the annex to decision XI/17, in the repository, as referred to in decision X/29 and decision XI/17, and, for the purpose set out in decision X/29, to submit them to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) and particularly its Ad Hoc Open-ended Informal Working Group to Study Issues Relating to the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity Beyond Areas of National Jurisdiction, as well as to submit them to Parties, other Governments and relevant international organizations. The eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties further requested the Executive Secretary to submit them to the Ad Hoc Working Group of the Whole on the Regular Process for Global Reporting and Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, including Socioeconomic Aspects, as well as to provide them as a source of information to United Nations specialized agencies. 5. The Conference of the Parties, in its decision XI/17, also requested the Executive Secretary to further collaborate with Parties, other Governments, competent organizations, and global and regional initiatives, such as the United Nations General Assembly Ad Hoc Working Group of the Whole on the Regular Process for Global Reporting and Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, including Socioeconomic Aspects, the International Maritime Organization, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, regional seas conventions and action plans, and, where appropriate, regional fisheries management organizations with regard to fisheries management, and also including the participation of indigenous and local communities, to facilitate the description of areas that meet the criteria for EBSAs through the organization of additional regional or subregional workshops for the remaining regions or subregions where Parties wish workshops to be held, and for the further description of the areas already described where new information becomes available, as appropriate, and to make the reports available for consideration by future meetings of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice. The summary reports from the Subsidiary Body will be made available for future meetings of the Conference of the Parties for consideration with a view to including the reports in the repository in line with the purpose and procedures set out in decision X/29 and decision XI/17. 6. Pursuant to the above requests and with financial support from the Governments of Norway, Japan (through the Japan Biodiversity Fund), and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Executive Secretary convened the South-Eastern Atlantic Regional Workshop to Facilitate the Description of Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs), in collaboration with the Abidjan Convention Secretariat, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO). This workshop was hosted by the Government of Namibia and took place in Swakopmund, from 8 to 12 April 2013. /... UNEP/CBD/RW/EBSA/SEA/1/4 Page 3 7. Through the financial support from the Government of Japan (Japan Biodiversity Fund), the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity commissioned a technical team of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation to support scientific and technical preparation for the workshop. The results of this technical preparation were made available in the meeting document UNEP/CBD/RW/EBSA/SEA/1/3 (available at http://www.cbd.int/doc/?meeting=EBSA-SEA- 01). 8. The meeting was attended by experts from Angola, Benin, Cameroon, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Liberia, Mauritania, Morocco, Namibia, Norway, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, and Togo as well as the Abidjan Convention Secretariat, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), OBIS-UNESCO/IOC, South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO), Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem Project (BCLME), Canary Current Large Marine Ecosystem Project, Fisheries Expert Group of the Commission on Ecosystem Management of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN-CEM-FEG), Global Ocean Biodiversity Initiative (GOBI), International Collective in Support of Fishworkers, BirdLife International, Centre de Suivi Ecologique de Dakar, Fondation Internationale du Banc d’Arguin–FIBA, Programme Gestion de Ressources Naturelles (ProGRN) in Mauritania, Réseau Régional d’Aires Marines Protégées en Afrique de l’Ouest (RAMPAO), WWF West Africa Marine Ecoregion Office (WAMER), and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Local observers recommended by the hosting government also attended the workshop. Some participants from Parties in this region were unable to attend the workshop due to logistical reasons, although they had been invited and their travel had been arranged by the Secretariat based on nominations by respective national focal points. Some Parties did not nominate an expert, although invited to do so by the Secretariat. The full list of participants is attached as annex I. ITEM 1. OPENING OF THE MEETING 9. On behalf of the South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO), Mr. Ben van Zyl, Executive Secretary, welcomed participants to Namibia, and to Swakopmund
Recommended publications
  • Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E

    Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E. Hepner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hepner, Megan E., "Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by Megan E. Hepner A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine Science with a concentration in Marine Resource Assessment College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Frank Muller-Karger, Ph.D. Christopher Stallings, Ph.D. Steve Gittings, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 31st, 2017 Keywords: Species richness, biodiversity, functional diversity, species traits Copyright © 2017, Megan E. Hepner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major advisor, Dr. Frank Muller-Karger, who provided opportunities for me to strengthen my skills as a researcher on research cruises, dive surveys, and in the laboratory, and as a communicator through oral and presentations at conferences, and for encouraging my participation as a full team member in various meetings of the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and other science meetings.
  • West Africa Part III: Central Africa Part IV: East Africa & Southern Africa Name: Date

    West Africa Part III: Central Africa Part IV: East Africa & Southern Africa Name: Date

    Part I: North Africa Part II: West Africa Part III: Central Africa Part IV: East Africa & Southern Africa Name: Date: AFRI CA Overview RICA lies at the heart of the earth's land­ Then, during the nineteenth century, masses. It sits astride the equator, with European traders began setting up trading sta­ . almost half the continent to the north tions along the coast of West Africa. The of the equator, and half to the south. It con­ traders, and their governments, soon saw great tains some of the world's greatest deserts, as opportunity for profit in Africa. Eventually, well as some of the world's greatest rivers. It many European countries took control of the has snow-capped mountains, and parched, arid land and divided it into colonies. plains. The first humans came from Africa. By the middle of the twentieth century, peo­ And in the millennia since those fust humans ple all across Africa had demanded indepen­ walked the plains of Africa, many different cul­ dence from colonial rule. By the end of the tures have arisen there. century, government had passed firmly into Physically, Africa is one enormous plateau. It African hands. However, the newly independ­ has no continental-scale mountain chains, no ent nations must still deal with the legacy of peninsulas, no deep fjords. Most of the conti­ colonialism. The boundaries the European nent is more than 1000 feet (300m) above sea powers created often cut across ethnic and cul­ level; over half is above 2500 feet (800 m). tural groups. Many African nations today are Africa's early history reflects the wide stretch still struggling to reconcile the different cul­ of the continent.
  • The Taxonomy of the Procellariiformes Has Been Proposed from Various Approaches

    The Taxonomy of the Procellariiformes Has Been Proposed from Various Approaches

    山 階 鳥 研 報(J. Yamashina Inst. Ornithol.),22:114-23,1990 Genetic Divergence and Relationships in Fifteen Species of Procellariiformes Nagahisa Kuroda*, Ryozo Kakizawa* and Masayoshi Watada** Abstract The genetic analysis of 23 protein loci in 15 species of Procellariiformes was made The genetic distancesbetween the specieswas calculatedand a dendrogram was formulated of the group. The separation of Hydrobatidae from all other taxa including Diomedeidae agrees with other precedent works. The resultsof the present study support the basic Procellariidclassification system. However, two points stillneed further study. The firstpoint is that Fulmarus diverged earlier from the Procellariidsthan did the Diomedeidae. The second point is the position of Puffinuspacificus which appears more closely related to the Pterodroma petrels than to other Puffinus species. These points are discussed. Introduction The taxonomy of the Procellariiformes has been proposed from various approaches. The earliest study by Forbes (1882) was made by appendicular myology. Godman (1906) and Loomis (1918) studied this group from a morphological point of view. The taxonomy of the Procellariiformes by functional osteology and appendicular myology was studied by Kuroda (1954, 1983) and Klemm (1969), The results of the various studies agreed in proposing four families of Procellariiformes: Diomedeidae, Procellariidae, Hydrobatidae, and Pelecanoididae. They also pointed out that the Procellariidae was a heterogenous group among them. Timmermann (1958) found the parallel evolution of mallophaga and their hosts in Procellariiformes. Recently, electrophoretical studies have been made on the Procellariiformes. Harper (1978) found different patterns of the electromorph among the families. Bar- rowclough et al. (1981) studied genetic differentiation among 12 species of Procellari- iformes at 16 loci, and discussed the genetic distances among the taxa but with no consideration of their phylogenetic relationships.
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos

    Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos

    A Chave Os nomes galegos dos moluscos 2017 Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (2017): Nomes galegos dos moluscos recomendados pola Chave. http://www.achave.gal/wp-content/uploads/achave_osnomesgalegosdos_moluscos.pdf 1 Notas introdutorias O que contén este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións para as especies de moluscos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algunhas das especies exóticas máis coñecidas (xeralmente no ámbito divulgativo, por causa do seu interese científico ou económico, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas). En total, achéganse nomes galegos para 534 especies de moluscos. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase unha clasificación taxonómica que considera as clases, ordes, superfamilias e familias de moluscos. Aquí apúntase, de maneira xeral, os nomes dos moluscos que hai en cada familia. A seguir vén o corpo do documento, onde se indica, especie por especie, alén do nome científico, os nomes galegos e ingleses de cada molusco (nalgún caso, tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles). Ao final inclúese unha listaxe de referencias bibliográficas que foron utilizadas para a elaboración do presente documento. Nalgunhas desas referencias recolléronse ou propuxéronse nomes galegos para os moluscos, quer xenéricos quer específicos. Outras referencias achegan nomes para os moluscos noutras linguas, que tamén foron tidos en conta. Alén diso, inclúense algunhas fontes básicas a respecto da metodoloxía e dos criterios terminolóxicos empregados. 2 Tratamento terminolóxico De modo moi resumido, traballouse nas seguintes liñas e cos seguintes criterios: En primeiro lugar, aprofundouse no acervo lingüístico galego. A respecto dos nomes dos moluscos, a lingua galega é riquísima e dispomos dunha chea de nomes, tanto específicos (que designan un único animal) como xenéricos (que designan varios animais parecidos).
  • Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia

    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia

    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia Submitted in accordance with Foreign Assistance Act Sections 118/119 February 20, 2004 Prepared for USAID/Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 3-5 Jakarta 10110 Indonesia Prepared by Steve Rhee, M.E.Sc. Darrell Kitchener, Ph.D. Tim Brown, Ph.D. Reed Merrill, M.Sc. Russ Dilts, Ph.D. Stacey Tighe, Ph.D. Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms....................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................1- 1 2. Legislative and Institutional Structure Affecting Biological Resources...............................2 - 1 2.1 Government of Indonesia................................................................................................2 - 2 2.1.1 Legislative Basis for Protection and Management of Biodiversity and
  • Modeling Regional Coastal Evolution in the Bight Of

    Modeling Regional Coastal Evolution in the Bight Of

    MODELING REGIONAL COASTAL EVOLUTION IN THE BIGHT OF BENIN, GULF OF GUINEA, WEST AFRICA Ondoa Gregoire Abessolo, Magnus Larson, Rafael Almar, Bruno Castelle, Edward Anthony, Johan Reyns To cite this version: Ondoa Gregoire Abessolo, Magnus Larson, Rafael Almar, Bruno Castelle, Edward Anthony, et al.. MODELING REGIONAL COASTAL EVOLUTION IN THE BIGHT OF BENIN, GULF OF GUINEA, WEST AFRICA. Coastal Sediments’19, May 2019, Tampa, United States. 10.1142/9789811204487_0178. hal-02394959 HAL Id: hal-02394959 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02394959 Submitted on 11 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. MODELING REGIONAL COASTAL EVOLUTION IN THE BIGHT OF BENIN, GULF OF GUINEA, WEST AFRICA ONDOA GREGOIRE ABESSOLO1,2, MAGNUS LARSON3, RAFAEL ALMAR1, BRUNO CASTELLE4, EDWARD J. ANTHONY5, J. REYNS6,7 1. LEGOS, OMP, UMR 5566 (CNRS/CNES/IRD/Université de Toulouse), 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400, Toulouse, France. [email protected], [email protected]. 2. Ecosystems and Fisheries Resources Laboratory, University of Douala, BP 2701, Douala, Cameroun. 3. Department of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University, Box 118, S-221 00, Lund, Sweden. [email protected]. 4. EPOC, OASU, UMR 5805 (CNRS - Université de Bordeaux), Allée Geoffroy Saint- Hilaire – CS 50023 – 33615, Pessac Cedex, France.
  • The Rise and Fall of Bulwer's Petrel

    The Rise and Fall of Bulwer's Petrel

    A paper from the British Ornithologists’ Union Records Committee The rise and fall of Bulwer’s Petrel Andrew H. J. Harrop ABSTRACT This short paper examines two recent reviews of records of Bulwer’s Petrel Bulweria bulwerii in Britain by BOURC. Four records were assessed, including three specimen records from the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and a modern-day sighting from Cumbria. None was found acceptable, and the reasons are discussed here. ulwer’s Petrel Bulweria bulwerii was By the time The Handbook was published, seven named after Rev. James Bulwer, an records were listed for Britain, all in England Bamateur Norfolk collector, naturalist and (Witherby et al. 1940), and these were repeated conchologist, who first collected it in Madeira, in Bannerman’s The Birds of the British Isles probably in 1825 during a short expedition to (1959). Of these seven, four (all from Sussex, Deserta Grande (Mearns & Mearns 1988). It between 1904 and 1914) were subsequently was first described by Sir William Jardine and rejected as ‘Hastings Rarities’ (Nicholson & Fer- Prideaux John Selby, in Illustrations of guson-Lees 1962; see plate 380) and a fifth, said Ornithology in 1828 (Jardine & Selby 1828). The to have been picked up at Beachy Head, Sussex, species has had a turbulent history as a British by an unnamed person on 3rd February 1903, bird. This paper provides a brief summary of escaped this fate only because it occurred records in the British ornithological literature, outside the area used to define ‘Hastings’ presents the results of two BOURC reviews, and records (Bourne 1967).
  • Insularum Scientia

    Insularum Scientia

    Revista de Ciencias Naturales en islas scientia insularum Universidad de La Laguna 2 2019 Revista SCIENTIA INSULARUM Revista SCIENTIA INSULARUM Revista Científica de la Universidad de La Laguna DIRecTOR / EDITOR IN CHIEF José Carlos Hernández (ULL). [email protected] COORDINADORES / SENIOR EDITORS Carlos Sangil Hernández (ULL). [email protected], José María Fernández-Palacios (ULL). [email protected], Lea de Nascimento (ULL), [email protected]. COnsejO DE REDAccIÓN / ASSISTANT EDITORS Juan Carlos Rando Reyes (ULL). [email protected] Margarita Jambrina-Enríquez (ULL). [email protected] Israel Pérez-Vargas (ULL). [email protected] Jairo Patiño (ULL). [email protected] Carlos Ruiz Carreira (ULL). [email protected] Carolina Mallol (ULL). [email protected] COnsejO AsesOR / SCIENTIFIC BOARD Aarón González Castro, Adriana Rodríguez Hernández, Airám Rodríguez Martín, Alberto Brito Hernández, Alejandro Escanez, Alejandro Martínez García, Alfredo Reyes Betancort, Alfredo Valido Amador, Ana Isabel de Melo Azevedo Neto, Ana Sofia P.S. Reboleira, Aníbal Delgado Medina, Beatriz Rumeu, Beneharo Rodríguez Martín, Carlos Aguiar, Celso A. Hernández Díaz, Corrine Almeida, David Hernández Teixidor, David Pérez Padilla, Eliseba García Padrón, Félix Manuel Medina Hijazo, Fernándo Espino, Filipe Alves, Francisco J. Pérez-Torrado, Guilherme Ortigara Longo, Gustavo M. Martins, Heriberto López, Isildo Gomes, Israel Pérez Vargas, Jairo Patiño Llorente, Jesús M. Falcón Toledo, Jorge Henrique Capelo Gonçalves, Jorge Núñez Fraga, José María Landeira,
  • In the Mediterranean

    In the Mediterranean

    Project FAO-COPEMED / Grandes Pelágicos’2000 SUBSCRIPT OBJETIVE 1 OBJECTIVE 1 : HIDROGRAPHICAL DESCRIPTION ......................................................2 GENERAL CIRCULATION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN................................................2 1. Circulation of Atlantic water ......................................................................................3 2. Circulation of Levantine Intermediate Water.............................................................6 STRAIT HIDROLOGY .....................................................................................................8 1. Salinity........................................................................................................................8 2. Temperature................................................................................................................8 3. Currents ......................................................................................................................9 4. Tide.............................................................................................................................9 ALBORAN SEA ..............................................................................................................12 CATALAN-BALEARIC..................................................................................................14 NORTH TUNISIAN COASTS ........................................................................................15 1. The Gulf of Tunis .....................................................................................................16
  • Investment Opportunities in Africa

    Investment Opportunities in Africa

    A PUBLICATION BY THE AFRICAN AMBASSADORS GROUP IN CAIRO INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN AFRICA In collaboration with the African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) A PUBLICATION BY THE AFRICAN AMBASSADORS GROUP IN CAIRO INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN AFRICA © Copyright African Ambassadors Group in Cairo, 2018. All rights reserved. African Ambassadors Group in Cairo Email: [email protected] This publication was produced by the African Ambassadors Group in Cairo in collaboration with the African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 8 VOTE OF THANKS 10 INTRODUCTION 12 THE PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ALGERIA 14 THE REPUBLIC OF ANGOLA 18 BURKINA FASO 22 THE REPUBLIC OF BURUNDI 28 THE REPUBLIC OF CAMEROON 32 THE REPUBLIC OF CHAD 36 THE UNION OF COMOROS 40 THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO 44 THE REPUBLIC OF CONGO 50 THE REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D’IVOIRE 56 THE REPUBLIC OF DJIBOUTI 60 THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT 66 THE STATE OF ERITREA 70 THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA 74 THE REPUBLIC OF EQUATORIAL GUINEA 78 THE GABONESE REPUBLIC 82 THE REPUBLIC OF GHANA 86 THE REPUBLIC OF GUINEA 90 THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA 94 THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA 98 THE REPUBLIC OF MALAWI 102 THE REPUBLIC OF MALI 108 THE REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS 112 THE KINGDOM OF MOROCCO 116 THE REPUBLIC OF MOZAMBIQUE 120 THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA 126 THE REPUBLIC OF NIGER 130 THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA 134 THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA 138 THE REPUBLIC OF SIERRA LEONE 144 THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF SOMALIA 148 THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA 152 THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN 158 THE REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN 162 THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA 166 THE REPUBLIC OF TUNISIA 170 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA 174 THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA 178 THE REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE 184 ABOUT AFREXIMBANK 188 FOREWORD Global perception on Africa has positively evolved.
  • Suborder ACANTHUROIDEI EPHIPPIDAE Chaetodipterus Faber

    Suborder ACANTHUROIDEI EPHIPPIDAE Chaetodipterus Faber

    click for previous page Perciformes: Acanthuroidei: Ephippidae 1799 Suborder ACANTHUROIDEI EPHIPPIDAE Spadefishes by W.E. Burgess, Red Bank, New Jersey, USA A single species occurring in the area. Chaetodipterus faber (Broussonet, 1782) HRF Frequent synonyms / misidentifications: None / None. FAO names: En - Atlantic spadefish; Fr - Disque portuguais; Sp - Paguara. Diagnostic characters: Body deep, included 1.2 to 1.5 times in standard length, orbicular, strongly compressed. Mouth small, terminal, jaws provided with bands of brush-like teeth, outer row larger and slightly compressed but pointed at tip. Vomer and palatines toothless. Preopercular margin finely serrate; opercle ends in blunt point. Dorsal fin with 9 spines and 21 to 23 soft rays. Spinous portion of dorsal fin low in adults, distinct from soft-rayed portion; anterior portion of soft dorsal and anal fins prolonged.Juve- niles with third dorsal fin spine prolonged, becoming proportionately smaller with age. Anal fin with 3 spines and 18 or 19 rays. Pectoral fins short, about 1.6 in head, with 17 or 18 soft rays. Caudal fin emarginate. Pelvic fins long, extending to origin of anal fin in adults, beyond that in young. Lateral-line scales 45 to 50. Head and fins scaled. Colour: silvery grey with blackish bars (bars may fade in large individuals) as follows: Eye bar extends from nape through eye to chest; first body bar starts at predorsal area, crosses body behind pectoral fin insertion, and ends on abdomen; second body bar incomplete, extending from anterior dorsal-fin spines vertically toward abdomen but ending just below level of pectoral-fin base;third body bar extends from anterior rays of dorsal fin across body to anterior rays of anal fin;last body bar runs from the middle soft dorsal fin rays to middle soft anal-fin rays; last bar crosses caudal peduncle at caudal-fin base.
  • In the Cape Verde Islands

    In the Cape Verde Islands

    ZOOLOGIA CABOVERDIANA REVISTA DA SOCIEDADE CABOVERDIANA DE ZOOLOGIA VOLUME 5 | NÚMERO 1 Abril de 2014 ZOOLOGIA CABOVERDIANA REVISTA DA SOCIEDADE CABOVERDIANA DE ZOOLOGIA Zoologia Caboverdiana is a peer-reviewed open-access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles and short notes in all areas of zoology and paleontology of the Cape Verde Islands. Articles may be written in English (with Portuguese summary) or Portuguese (with English summary). Zoologia Caboverdiana is published biannually, with issues in spring and autumn. For further information, contact the Editor. Instructions for authors can be downloaded at www.scvz.org Zoologia Caboverdiana é uma revista científica com arbitragem científica (peer-review) e de acesso livre. Nela são publicados artigos de investigação original, artigos de síntese e notas breves sobre zoologia e paleontologia das Ilhas de Cabo Verde. Os artigos podem ser submetidos em inglês (com um resumo em português) ou em português (com um resumo em inglês). Zoologia Caboverdiana tem periodicidade bianual, com edições na primavera e no outono. Para mais informações, deve contactar o Editor. Normas para os autores podem ser obtidas em www.scvz.org Chief Editor | Editor principal Dr Cornelis J. Hazevoet (Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical, Portugal); [email protected] Editorial Board | Conselho editorial Dr Joana Alves (Instituto Nacional de Saúde Pública, Praia, Cape Verde) Prof. Dr G.J. Boekschoten (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Dr Eduardo Ferreira (Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal) Rui M. Freitas (Universidade de Cabo Verde, Mindelo, Cape Verde) Dr Javier Juste (Estación Biológica de Doñana, Spain) Evandro Lopes (Universidade de Cabo Verde, Mindelo, Cape Verde) Dr Adolfo Marco (Estación Biológica de Doñana, Spain) Prof.