DOCSLIB.ORG

LMF-112 Human Radiation Exposures Related to Nuclear Weapons.PDF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LMF-112 Human Radiation Exposures Related to Nuclear Weapons.PDF oJ LMF-112 UC-48 I LL SEPTEMBER 1985 _1 HUMAN RADIATION EXPOSURES RELATED TO NUCLEAR WEAPONS INDUSTRIES RICHARD G. CUDDIHY and GEORGE J. NEWTON INHALATION TOXICOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE IIIIII IIII IIII II II II II III I II LOVELACE BIOMEDICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE P.O. Box 5890 Albuquerque, NM 87185 SUPPORT FOR THIS WORK WAS PROVIDED BY SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES UNDER ORDER NUMBER 37-2341 AND U,S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONTRACT NUMBER DE-ACO4-76EVO I 0 I 3 ,.% This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Printed in the United States of America Availablefrom NationalTechnical Information Service U. S. Departmentof Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield,VA 22161 HUMANRADIATION EXPOSURES RELATED TO NUCLEARWEAPONS INSUSTRIES Richard G. Cuddihy and George J. Newton InhalationToxicology Research Institute LovelaceBiomedical and Environmental Research Institute P. O. Box 5890 Albuquerque, NM 87185 For questions please contact: Richard G. CUddihy, Ph.D. Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute P. O. Box 5890 Albuquerque, NN 87185 Telephone Commercial: (505) 844~7544 FTS: 844-7544 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. INTRODUCTION .................................... II. RADIATION DOSIMETRY AND HEALTH EFFECTS ....................... 5 Radiation Interactions in Tissues ....................... 6 Monitoring External and Internal Radiation Exposures ............. 9 Acute Radiation Injuries ........................... I0 Cancer Risks From Radiation .......................... 12 Models of Radiation Cancer Risk ........................ 13 Attributable Risk Calculations ........................ 18 Genetic Effects of Ionizing Radiation ..................... 20 Ill. CURRENT RESEARCH ON HEALTH RISKS FROM LOW-LEVEL RADIATION EXPOSURES ........ 25 Radiation Epidemiology Studies ........................ 25 Laboratory Animal Studies ........................... 34 Prospects for Resolving Radiation Risk Controversies ............. 36 IV. CONTINENTAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS TESTS ......................... 43 Project Trinity ................................ 43 Radiation Exposure Records for Project Trinity ................ 4"/ The Nevada Nuclear Weapons Test Site ..................... 47 Authority to Test Nuclear Weapons ....................... 49 Nuclear Weapons Tests at the Nevada Test Site ................. 53 Radiation Safety ............................... 53 Radiation Exposures to On-Site Personnel ................... 59 Radiation Exposures to Off-Site Populations .................. 61 Epidemiologic Studies of Fallout-Exposed Populations ............. 70 Litigation Related to Nuclear Weapons Testing in Nevada ............ -/5 V. OCEANIC NUCLEAR WEAPONS TESTS ........................... 87 Nuclear Weapons Tests at the Pacific Proving Grounds ............. 92 Nuclear Weapons Tests at Other Oceanic Sites ................. 96 Early Authority to Test Nuclear Weapons .................... 9B Radiological Safety .............................. i00 Radiation Exposures to Weapons Test Participants ............... 105 Radiation Exposures to the Marshallese .................... 110 Cleanup of the Bikini and Enewetak Atolls ................... 112 Personal Injury Claims Resulting from Oceanic Nuclear Weapons Tests ...... I18 Marshall Islands Plebiscite .......................... If8 Summary Perspectives and Research Needs .................... 120 ROCKY FLATS NUCLEAR WEAPONS FACILITY ........................ 123 Releases of Radioactivity from the Rocky Flats Facility ............ 124 Measurements of Plutonium and Americium in Soil ................ 126 Plutonium Concentrations in Air ........................ 130 SECTION PAGE Vl. (continued) Plutonium in Tissues of Rocky Flats Area Residents .............. 132 RadiationDoses to Denver A~ea Residentsfrom InternallyDeposited Plutonium .................................. 133 Surveys of Cancer Distribution Patterns in the Denver Area .......... 133 Radiation-Related Litigation Involving the Rocky Flats Plant ......... 136 Lessons Learned from the Rocky Flats Land Owners’ Litigation ......... 139 VII. ACCIDENTS INVOLVING NUCLEAR WEAPONS ........................ 143 Previous Nuclear Weapons Accidents ...................... 144 Palomares, Spain ............................... 145 Thule, 6reenland ............................... 150 Summary of Palomares and Thule Incidents ................... 152 VIII. SUMMARY ...................................... 155 GLOSSARY ...................................... 159 ii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NUMBER PAGE I-I Historicalsequence of governmentorganizations responsible for development of the United States nuclear weapons program .................. II-I Typical interactions of radiation with atoms and molecules of tissues ....... II-2 Illustrationof models used to calculateradiation doses to tissues from inhaled or ingested radioactivity ........................ lO II.-3 Mathematicalrelationships used to analyze radiationdose-effect information and predict risks for populationsexposed to all levels of radiation dose .... 16 II-4 Sample calculationof lung cancer risk projectedfor a typical U.S. white male who is exposed to lO0 rad at 35 years of age ................ 19 III-I Minimum number of individualsrequired to detect a statisticallysignificant increasein a health effect in a populationwith a spontaneousincidence, and a total probability of observing the health effect ............. 35 IV-1 Locationof the Alamogordobombing range in New Mexico showing the location of the Trinity Site ............................... 44 IV-2 Location of Trinity Site and its major supporting installations .......... 45 IV-3 Illustration showing the lines of authority for Project TRINITY .......... 46 IV-4 Locationof the Nevada Test Site in relationto Las Vegas, St. George, Cedar City, and other nearby communities .................... 48 IV-5 Map of the Nevada Test Site showing administrativeheadquarters at Camp Mercury,the militaryoperations base at Camp Desert Rock, and locations of a few well-publicized nuclear weapons tests ................. 49 IV.-6 Diagram showing current lines of authorityfor approvingnuclear weapons test operations and individual weapon tests ................... 50 IV-7 Diagram of the 3oint Test Organizationduring OperationUpshot-Knothole in 1953.. 51 IW8 Organizationsof the Test Manager,the Test Director,and the Support Director during Operation Upshot-Knothole in 1953 ................ 52 IV-9 Gamma and neutron radiationdoses to people related to nuclear weapon yields and distances from air-burst detonations .................... 55 IV-lO Fission product yields related to mass number and neutron energy for fission of 23Bu, 235U, 239pu, and 240pu ......................... 56 IV-ll External gamma exposure rate calculated for Shot Smoky by Dunning ......... 57 IV-12 Map showing residualsurface radiationintensities in mr/hr at 12 hr after detonation of Shot Smoky at 5:30 AM on August 31, 1957 ............. 59 IV-13 Outline of computerdata bases being developedby the United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency and maintainedat Las Vegas, Nevada available for public use ........................... 60 IV-14 Histogramshowing externalradiation exposures for participantsin nuclear weapons tests at the Nevada Test Site during 1951, 1952, 1953, 1955, and 1957 .................................... 61 IV~l 5 Histogramshowing externalradiation exposures including all military personnelwho participatedin nuclear weapons tests at the Nevada and Pacific Test Sites ............................... 62 iii FIGURE NUMBER PAGE IV-16 Diagram of tasks being performedin the Off-SiteRadiation Exposure Review Project to estimateradiation doses to people who lived downwindfrom the Nevada Test Site during atmospheric nuclear weapons testing ........... 63 IV-17 Map showing residualsurface radiationintensities in mr/hr at 12 hr after detonation of Shot Harry on May 19, 1953 .................... 65 IV-I8 Schematicdiagram showing the ingestionpathway model used by the Off-Site RadiationExposure Review Project to calculateradiation doses to people living downwindfrom the Nevada Test Site during atmosphericnuclear weapons testing ................................. 68 IV-19 Illustrationof hlgh and low exposurecohorts of childrenunder 15 years of age who lived in Utah during atmosphericnuclear weapons testing at the Nevada Test Site to evaluateleukemia risks from exposuresto radioactive fallout ..................................... 74 IV-20 Illustrationof techniqueused by Gofman to estimatecancer risks for litigants in Allen et al. vs. the United States of America ........... 79 V-l Map of the Central Pacific showing locationof the MarshallIslands and other importantgeographic sites including aohnston Island and Christmas Island .... 88 V-2 Map of Bikini Atoll includingthe island’sEnglish code names and Marshallese names ................................ 89 V-3 Map of EnewetakAtoll includingthe island’sEnglish code names and Marshallese names ................................ 91 V-4 Diagram
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record—Senate S652
    S652 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE January 30, 2014 the Senate by Mr. Pate, one of his sec- Whereas, on October 31, 1952, Operation Ivy Guam, separated by a scant 30 miles, and retaries. was conducted on Elugelab Island (‘‘Flora’’) both are affected by the same win, weather in the Enewetak Atoll, in which the first and ocean current patterns, it logically fol- f true thermonuclear hydrogen bomb (a 10.4 lows that radiation which affects the Terri- EXECUTIVE MESSAGES REFERRED megaton device) code name Mike was deto- tory of Guam necessarily affects the Com- nated, destroying the entire island leaving monwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; As in executive session the Presiding behind a 6,240 feet across and 164 feet deep and Officer laid before the Senate messages crater in its aftermath; and Whereas, as a result, the Nuclear and Radi- from the President of the United Whereas, in 90 seconds the mushroom cloud ation Studies Board (‘‘NSRB’’) published in States submitting sundry nominations climbed to 57,000 feet into the atmosphere 2005 its report entitled ‘‘Assessment of the and two withdrawals which were re- and within 30 minutes had stretched 60 miles Scientific information for the Radiation Ex- in diameter with the base of the mushroom posure Screening and Education Program’’; ferred to the appropriate committees. head joining the stem of 45,000 feet; and and (The messages received today are Whereas, radioactive fallout is the after ef- Whereas, because fallout may have been printed at the end of the Senate pro- fect of the detonation
    [Show full text]
  • Richard G. Hewlett and Jack M. Holl. Atoms
    ATOMS PEACE WAR Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission Richard G. Hewlett and lack M. Roll With a Foreword by Richard S. Kirkendall and an Essay on Sources by Roger M. Anders University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London Published 1989 by the University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England Prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission; work made for hire. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hewlett, Richard G. Atoms for peace and war, 1953-1961. (California studies in the history of science) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Nuclear energy—United States—History. 2. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission—History. 3. Eisenhower, Dwight D. (Dwight David), 1890-1969. 4. United States—Politics and government-1953-1961. I. Holl, Jack M. II. Title. III. Series. QC792. 7. H48 1989 333.79'24'0973 88-29578 ISBN 0-520-06018-0 (alk. paper) Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CONTENTS List of Illustrations vii List of Figures and Tables ix Foreword by Richard S. Kirkendall xi Preface xix Acknowledgements xxvii 1. A Secret Mission 1 2. The Eisenhower Imprint 17 3. The President and the Bomb 34 4. The Oppenheimer Case 73 5. The Political Arena 113 6. Nuclear Weapons: A New Reality 144 7. Nuclear Power for the Marketplace 183 8. Atoms for Peace: Building American Policy 209 9. Pursuit of the Peaceful Atom 238 10. The Seeds of Anxiety 271 11. Safeguards, EURATOM, and the International Agency 305 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S652
    S652 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE January 30, 2014 the Senate by Mr. Pate, one of his sec- Whereas, on October 31, 1952, Operation Ivy Guam, separated by a scant 30 miles, and retaries. was conducted on Elugelab Island (‘‘Flora’’) both are affected by the same win, weather in the Enewetak Atoll, in which the first and ocean current patterns, it logically fol- f true thermonuclear hydrogen bomb (a 10.4 lows that radiation which affects the Terri- EXECUTIVE MESSAGES REFERRED megaton device) code name Mike was deto- tory of Guam necessarily affects the Com- nated, destroying the entire island leaving monwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; As in executive session the Presiding behind a 6,240 feet across and 164 feet deep and Officer laid before the Senate messages crater in its aftermath; and Whereas, as a result, the Nuclear and Radi- from the President of the United Whereas, in 90 seconds the mushroom cloud ation Studies Board (‘‘NSRB’’) published in States submitting sundry nominations climbed to 57,000 feet into the atmosphere 2005 its report entitled ‘‘Assessment of the and two withdrawals which were re- and within 30 minutes had stretched 60 miles Scientific information for the Radiation Ex- in diameter with the base of the mushroom posure Screening and Education Program’’; ferred to the appropriate committees. head joining the stem of 45,000 feet; and and (The messages received today are Whereas, radioactive fallout is the after ef- Whereas, because fallout may have been printed at the end of the Senate pro- fect of the detonation
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Resources of the Laura Area, Majuro Atoll, Marshall Islands
    GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF THE LAURA AREA, MAJURO ATOLL, MARSHALL ISLANDS By Scott N. Hamlin and Stephen S. Anthony U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 87-4047 Prepared in cooperation with the REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS Honolulu, Hawaii 1987 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report write to: can be purchased from: District Chief, Hawaii District U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Books and Open-File Reports Section 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Rm. 6110 Federal Center, Bldg. 41 Honolulu, Hawai 96850 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 Introduction -------------------------------------------------------- 2 Purpose and scope ---------------------------------------------- 5 Setting -------------------------------------------------------- 5 Previous investigations ---------------------------------------- 6 Acknowledgments ------------------------------------------------ 8 Methods of study ---------------------------------------------------- 8 Surface geophysical survey ------------------------------------- 8 Installation of driven-well network ---------------------------- 8 Test holes and collection of lithologic samples ---------------- 11 Collection of water samples ------------------------------------ 11 Measurements of water levels ----------------------------------- 13 Geohydrologic framework ---------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • PR Fosberg Issued by the PACIFIC SCIENCE
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN --------------- No. 61 Long-term Effects of Radioactive Fallou'c on Plants? by P. R. Fosberg Issued by THE PACIFIC SCIENCE BOARD National Academy of Sciences--National Research Council b?ashington, D. C. %Y 15, 1959 Long-term Effects of Radioactive Fallout on Plants?-1/ by F. R. Fosberg Botanist, U. S. Geological Survey A number of fallout surveys have been carried out since the widely publicized Castle Bravo bomb test on Bikini Atoll on March 1, 1954. Three of these were under the auspices of the U. S. Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory (NRDL). Among the results of the first of these sur- veys .was the establishment of a series of stations in the Northern Marshall Lslands in which the amount of fallout varied, irith radiation doses ranging from almost none to doses dangerous to human and animal life. A series of stations selected for subsequent resurvey are listed in order of increasing dose received expressed as total dose to infinity. This figure was obtained from the intensities in roentgens per hour on the day after the shot was fired. These rates were calculated from the earliest actual readings available and are given by Dunning (1957) on a map on page 2. The formula 5 x 24 x 4/hr at D + 1, ~rhereD i1 is as- sumed to be D , 24 hours, is used to calculate total dose to infinity. The time of arrival at Rongelap Islet was about 7 hours after the shot. The time to the other stations can safely be assumed to have been apt the same or longer, which would give a maximum error of 22 percent.- List of stations: Likiep Atoll, Lilsiep Islet .........
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Bravo
    Defense Threat Reduction Agency Defense Threat Reduction Information Analysis Center 1680 Texas Street SE Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-5669 DTRIAC SR-12-001 CASTLE BRAVO: FIFTY YEARS OF LEGEND AND LORE A Guide to Off-Site Radiation Exposures January 2013 Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Trade Names Statement: The use of trade names in this document does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial hardware or software. This document may not be cited for purposes of advertisement. REPORT Authored by: Thomas Kunkle Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico and Byron Ristvet Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Albuquerque, New Mexico SPECIAL Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall Islands Chronology: 1944-1981
    b , KARSHALL ISLANDS CHRONOLOGY - ERRATUM SHEET Page 12. column 1 and 2. “1955 - March 9 United Xations. .‘I and “May Enewetak . .” This should read. L956 - IMarch 9 United Nations..,“and IMay Enewetak .--*‘ Marshal ACHRONOLOGY: 1944-1981 LISRARY - ~ASHINCTGN, D.C. 2054-5 MICRONESIA SUPPORT COMlITTEE Honolulu, Hawalt F- ‘ifm ti R.EAD TICS ~RO?OLOGY: Weapons Testim--even numbered left hand pages 4-34; destruction of island home- Lands and radioactive wntamination of people, land and food sources. Resettlement of People--odd numbered right hand pages 5-39; the struggle to survive in exile. There is some necessary overlap for clarity; a list of sources used concludes the Chronology on pages 36 and 38. BIKINI ATOLL IN 1946, PRIOR TO THE START OF THE NUCLEAR TESTS. 1st edition publishe'dJuly 1978 2nd edition published August 1981 “?aRTlEGooDoFM ANKlND..~ Marshall Islands people have borne the brunt of U.S. military activity in Micronesia, from nuclear weapons experiments and missile testing to relocations of people and radio- active contamination of people and their environment. All, as an American military com- mder said of the Bikini teats, “for the good of mankind and to end all world wars.” Of eleven United Nations Trusteeships created after World War II, only Micronesia was designated a “strategic” trust, reflecting its military importance to the United States. Ihe U.N. agreement haa allowed the U.S. to use the islands for military purposes, while binding the U.S. to advance the well being of the people of Micronesia. Western nuclear powers have looked on the Pacific, because of its small isolated popu- lations, aa an “ideal” location to conduct nuclear activities unwanted In their own countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Atoll Research Bulletin No. 330 a Review of The
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 330 A REVIEW OF THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS BY F. RAYMOND FOSBERG ISSUED BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A. January 1990 A REVIEW OF THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS F. RAYMOND FOSBERG This review was prepared on very short notice, to provide a summary of what is known to the reviewer at the time, June 1988, about the natural phenomena of the Marshall Islands. This was for the use of the members of the survay team sent to the Marshalls by the Environmentand Policy Institute of the East-West Center, Honolulu. Their mission was to investigate the remaining relatively natural areas and the extent of biodiversity in the new Republic of the Marshall Islands. The Marshall Archipelago has been the habitat of Aboriginal man for many hundreds, perhaps even thousands, of years. Hence there is very little, if any, undisturbed land remaining. Since the coming of the Europeans, in the 19th Century, and especially in the years 1940 to the present, the disturbance and change have been greatly intensified. On four of the Atolls, namely, Eniwetok, Bikini, Kwajalein, and Majuro, the alteration has been catastrophic. Change is so rapid that even a superficial account of what was observed during the early and mid 1950's seems worth placing on permanent record. This account is definitely not the results of a systematic literature search, but merely what is stores in the reviewer's head and in his notebooks, with such additions as are acknowkedged in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • RONGELAP ATOLL LOCAL GOVERNMENT C 77 STATEMENT
    k . RONGELAP ATOLL LOCAL GOVERNMENT c 77 Republicof the MarshallIslands Senator Jeton An@In MAJURO OFFICE: Mayor Willie Mwekto P.o. Box 1006 Majuro, Marshall Island 96960 Ailm In f%nge~ap Telephone: 3285 STATEMENT OF SENATOR JETON ANJAIN ON BEHALF OF THE RONGELAP ATOLL LOCAL GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON INSULAR AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, D.C. NOVEMBER 16, 1989 , . STATEMENT OF SENATOR JETON ANJAIN ON BEHALF OF THE RONGEIAP ATOLL LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE RONGELAP PEOPLE LIVING IN EXILE AT MEJATO Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee: I am Senator Jeton Anjain. I represent the People of Rongelap’ in the Marshall Islands. For the Rongelap people. this is a most important day. on behalf of the Rongelap people, I thank you for the opportunity to appear before this Committee and to submit this statement. Several members of the Rongelap Council and community are with me today. Please let me introduce: * Council Member Lemyo Abon * Council Member Leyo Boas * Council Member Jorju Jabwe * Council Member Norio Kebenli * Josey Mellan. Treasurer, Rongelap Atoll Local Government * Clandon Abija * Sylvia Freddy * Elbo Lekebol * Almira Matayoshi While we live more than 7,000 miles from here, the Rongelap people clearly understand that decisions made in Washington to undertake nuclear atmospheric testing in the 1940’s and 1950’s profoundly and overwhelmingly affected our lives. Today, four decades later, the resulting radiation continues to dominate our very existence. One of the most radiotoxic elements known to man. plutonium, saturates our environment, yet the Department of Enereq concludes it is safe to live on our atoll.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission to the Marshall Islands: Comments by the State on the Report of the Special Rapporteur*
    United Nations A/HRC/21/48/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 September 2012 English only Human Rights Council Twenty-first session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on the implications for human rights of the environmentally sound management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes Addendum Mission to the Marshall Islands: comments by the State on the report of the Special Rapporteur* * Reproduced in the annex as received. GE.12-16355 A/HRC/21/48/Add.2 Annex [English only] Comments by the Marshall Islands on the report of the Special Rapporteur on the implications for human rights of the environmentally sound management and disposal of hazardous substances and waste (A/HRC/21/48/Add.1) 1. The people and the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) are intimately aware of the numerous and extreme complexities involved in assessing the consequences of the nuclear weapons testing program conducted in its territory. It is not a task that can be completed within a period of less than one year and with a country visit of just four days to the capital atoll of Majuro. Accordingly, the RMI greatly appreciates the understandings and insights regarding those consequences and their various impacts human rights, as contained in the report of the Special Rapporteur. Comments regarding paragraph 12 2. The discussion of relocations and evacuations of people as a result of the nuclear weapons testing program is incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Management Profiles : a Directory of Pacific Island Governments and Non-Government Agencies with Coastal Management Related Responsibilities
    A Directory of COASTAL Pacific Island MANAGEMENT Governments and non Government PROFILES Agencies with Coastal Management related Responsibilities henfeld ac W vid Da Photo: SPREP South Pacific Regional Environment Programme SPREP Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Coastal Management Profiles : A Directory of Pacific Island Governments and non-Government Agencies with Coastal Management Related Responsibilities. – Apia, Samoa : SPREP, 1999. vi, 205 p. ; 29 cm ISBN: 982-04-0198-4 1. Coastal zone management – Oceania – Directories. 2. Coastal engineering - Oceania – Directories. I. South Pacific Regional Environment Programme. 025.1641 Published in June 1999 by the South Pacific Regional Environment Programme PO Box 240 Apia, Samoa Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.sprep.org.ws/ Produced by SPREP Edited by Carole Hunter Layout and design by Andreas Wagner (WWd, Australia) email: [email protected] Cover photo: David Wachenfeld (Triggerfish Images, Australia) email: [email protected] Typeset in 9.5/12 (New Century Schoolbook) Printed on recycled paper 90gsm Savannah Matt Art (60%) by Quality Print Ltd, Fiji © South Pacific Regional Environment Programme, 1999. The South Pacific Regional Environment Programme authorises the reproduction of this material, whole or in part, in any form provided appropriate acknowledgement is given. Original Text: English SPREP’s Climate Change and Integrated Coastal Management Programme COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROFILES A DIRECTORY OF PACIFIC ISLAND GOVERNMENTS AND NON GOVERNMENT AGENCIES WITH COASTAL MANAGEMENT RELATED RESPONSIBILITIES South Pacific Regional Environment Programme FOREWORD hese Coastal Management Profiles are a direct response to country requests for a directory containing guidance on who is doing what Tin coastal management within the Pacific islands region.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Turtle Resources
    FI xSF'/f;lOP/RID(l 102/6 1 Miu•oh 19'/2 EJOUT:H PACHIC :rnI.ANDS ~ EU!RINID TURTLE IU!JSOURCES A :i."epo:r.'t IJ:rop&,::rect for the South PMific Iolanda JJ1 i1me:i.~1e~ D.!Jv®lopm*'nt Agenc..'Y by ,J oRo :mu1driolwo11 i\im•i:uo Biology ( 1l'ul'Uaa) Con<!ttltaxri; Rom", 1972 WS/07567 1 • IN'l'RODUG'rION 2. U .s. TRUS'l' TERRI'l'OHY OF ~1'I1JIJ PACIFIC ISLANDS 2.1 SynopBiB of Act:ivi'!;y 2. 2 FincLings 2 2.3 Recormnanda/Gions 5 3. GUAM 6 3.1 Synopsis of Activities 6 3.2 Findingfl 6 3.3 Racomrnenda:tions 6 PAPUA-NEW GUINEA 4.1 Synop.iia of Activitio111 7 4. 2 Finding•~ 7 4.3 Recommendations 9 CONSOLIDATED llEOOMM:filNDA'I'IONS 10 ITHIERARY 12 PIIRSONS INTERVIlll'IIilD 13 covering work in ·~he Uo(1o •1:r1.ucs1; of ·th€c' PiM~if:tc Ial!'!,nM and in iB 1J&o~3<!3d. upon itr!;®;:vi•~W3 uH;h [f~':MV®rnrn<iJn·~ and. fish~n:y o:fficilil,18~ marine 'r.urtl121 fi11h0rmoen EJXH'I. ancl loe~J. :inht",11:l.'l;E:l..n't!'! i;,1 itn1 t;o ce>rrh~i1nrte llSeful ini'orm.1J;tio:n. a:ml 'eh@ consulta:!'rt to ti1rtle nesting heach~rn ~u1cl feeding H foUowa I:nfo:r"!llal report FI~Sl;y'SOP/REG 'i02/2 by In 19689 M a :reimH; of dit!m1eRl!iom1 wit;h South J?a,cific C<i~1tmi&uJion ( SPC) officers, ·the consultant B.
    [Show full text]