Social Impact Assessment Study Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor Project

Site: Chamrawali Bodaki Chithehra, Kathehra, and Palla Dadri Tehsil, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh

Draft submitted for Public Hearing and Consultations with Key Stakeholders

Submitted by

Gautam Buddha University Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201310 November 2020

Table of Contents

Particulars Page No. 1. Executive Summary 3-7 2. Detailed Project Description 8-17 2.1. Introduction 8 2.1.1. DMIC Details and Project Site 10 2.1.2. Rationale for the DMIC Project 12 2.2. Screening and Scoping of the SIA 17 3. Approach and Methodology for the SIA 18-27 3.1. Description of Social Impact Assessment 18 3.2. Rationale and Objective of the SIA 19 3.3. The Research Methodology 19 3.3.1 Data Needs and Information Requirements 20 3.3.2 Data Collection 20 3.4. Tools used to Collect Information 21 3.4.1. Socio-Economic Survey 21 3.4.2. Community Stakeholder Consultations and FGDs 23 3.4.3. Overview of Information and Data Sources Used 23 3.5. The SIA Team and their areas of expertise 24 3.6. Schedule of the study and Consultation with Stakeholders 25 4. Socio-Economic profile of Impact Zone 28-34 4.1. Overview of UP and Project Influence Area 28 4.2. Project Influence Area- Dadri Tehsil 29 4.3. Socio-economic profile of Direct Impact Zone 32 5. Land Assessment of the PAFs 34-36 5.1. Land Holdings in Chamrawli Bodaki, Chithehra, Kathehra, and Palla, 34 5.2. Land requirements and Present Land Use 35 5.3. Crops in the area 36 6. Estimation and Enumeration 37-38 6.1. Households and structures enumeration 37 6.2. Typology of structures in the DIZ 37 6.3. PAPs in the Direct Impact Zone 37 7. Socio-economic profile of PAPs 39-87 7.1 Demographic Details of PAFs 39 7.2. Demographics Details of PAPs 39 7.3 Vulnerability Status 53 7.4. Social Infrastructure in the Direct Impact Zone 60 7.5 Information Regarding Land and Livelihood 61 7.6 Information about Trees on Land 66 7.7 Information about Crops 67 7.8 Availability/Access to Natural or Common Resources 67 7.9 Common Resources and Public Amenities 73 7.10: Impact analysis of Acquisition of Land, Livelihood and Income 74

711 : Impact Analysis of Physical Resources 82 7.12: The Collective Inferences: 85 8. Public Consultations - FGD 87-99 8.1. Need for Focus Group - Public Consultations 87 8.2 Focus Group - Research Design and Data Collection 88 8.3 Focus Group Study of Chamrawali Bodaki-Chitehara–Katehara–Palla 89 9. Public Consultations - Public Hearing 100 9.1. Need for Public Consultations - Public Hearing 9.2. Details of the Public Consultations 9.3 Key Concerns and Recommendations 9.4. Pictures from the Project Site 9.5. Pictures from the Public Hearings 10. Social Impact Analysis of DMIC 101-105 10.1. Potential Positive Impacts 101 10.2 Positive Impacts Perceived by PAFs 101 10.3 Impact on Poverty Reduction 102 10.4 Key Adverse Impacts 103 10.4.1 Impact on Land 103 10.4.2 Impact on Common Structures 103 10.4.3 Impact on Fixed Assets and Occupational Structure 103 10.4.4 Impact on Livestock and Crops 104 10.4.5 Impact on the People in the Adjacent Area 104 10.5 Concerns Perceived by the PAPs 105 11. Social Impact Management Plan 106-112 11.1 Approach to Mitigation Measures 106 11.2 Impact and Management Plan 107 11.3 Gender Plan 108 11.3.1 Management Plan for Women 108 11.4 Training Need Assessment 110 11.5 Livelihood Restoration and Income Generation Strategy via Skill Mapping 110 12. Annexures 113 12.1. Land Owners Details Onwards 12.2. Structured Questionnaire 12.3 Orders and Letters

1. Executive Summary

1. The DMIC project was launched in pursuance of an MOU signed between the Government of India and the Government of Japan in December 2006. DMIC Development Corporation (DMICDC) incorporated in 2008, is the implementing agency for the project. DMICDC has been registered as a company with 49% equity of Government of India, 26% equity of the JBIC and the remaining held by government financial institutions. The Japanese Government had also announced financial support for DMIC project to an extent of US$ 4.5 billion in the first phase for the projects with Japanese participation involving cutting edge technology. 2. The project spans the States of Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Maharashtra along the Western Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) of the railways. Initially, 8 nodes/cities in the six DMIC states have been taken up for development.

3. DMIC is being developed along with the Western Dedicated Freight Corridor (WDFC). DFCCIL, a Ministry of Railways, Government of India enterprise, is developing WDFC, which passes through the states of Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Maharashtra, having end terminals at Dadri in the Uttar Pradesh and Jawaharlal Nehru Port (JNPT) near Mumbai, Maharashtra. The Dedicated Fright Corridor offers high-speed connectivity for High Axle Load Wagons supported by high power locomotives. DMIC will leverage the High Speed – High Capacity connectivity of WDFC.

4. Under the Dadri-Ghaziabad-Noida Investment Region of DMIC, following three Early Bird Projects are being developed: a. Integrated Industrial Township at Greater Noida b. Multi Modal Logistic Hub (Freight Village) at Dadri, Greater Noida and c. Multi Modal Transport Hub at Boraki, Greater Noida 5. The objective of DMIC is to expand India’s Manufacturing & Services base and develop DMIC as a “Global Manufacturing and Trading Hub”. It will provide a major impetus to planned urbanization in India with manufacturing as the key

driver. In addition to new Industrial Cities, it envisages development of infrastructure linkages like power plants, assured water supply, high capacity transportation and logistics facilities as well as softer interventions like skill development programme for employment of the local populace. 6. A site of 302.63ha has been developed for the “Integrated Industrial Township (IIT)” under Dadri-Noida-Ghaziabad Investment Region of DMIC to facilitate large scale investments for the commercial and industrial development expected in DMIC region. 7. The proposed Freight Village site is located in Dadri Tehsil of Gautam Budh Nagar of Uttar Pradesh. The site is in close proximity of Delhi-Howrah Broad Gauge line in the south west and NH 91 in North West. The UP Government has already initiated the land acquisition process. The site identified for Freight Village located in Dadri Tehsil in the planning boundaries of the city of Greater Noida and its extension. 8. The MMTH at Greater Noida has been planned with the key objective to create a world-class intermodal transport station with provision of international level facilities incorporating the Rail, Road and MRTS accessibility for the passengers, in a seamless manner. 9. The proposed Dadri-Ghaziabad-Noida Investment Region of DMIC that includes three Early Bird Projects namely Integrated Industrial Township at Greater Noida, Multi Modal Logistic Hub (Freight Village) at Dadri, Greater Noida and Multi Modal Transport Hub at Boraki, Greater Noida will cause involuntary resettlement of the PAFs across the four villages (Chamrawali Bodaki, Chithehra, Katehra and Palla) that are being subsumed under this phase of land area acquisition. 10. The land holdings of the PAPs range from less than half a hectare up to above 3 hectares. The majority of the land holders are consolidated within the bracket of 0 to 1 hectare. As per the RFCTLARR Act, 2013, marginal farmers in irrigated land are defined as those having holdings below 0.5 Ha and small farmers as those with holdings between 0.5 to 1 Ha. As can be seen, from the table 5.1, there are large numbers about 82.59 percentage of landholders who are

marginal and merely 12.97% of the landholders can be categorized as small farmers. As per the village Land Records and household (Annexed), the landholdings for Gautam Budh Nagar district, almost 88.82 % of agricultural holdings can be categorized as marginal and small farmers, which is almost in similar pattern as distribution found in India across and in Uttar Pradesh as per Agriculture Census 2015-16. 11. The total land required for the project is 87.8624 Hectares carved out of total area of the four villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” Dadri Tehsil, consisting of 293 land plots or gatasankhya mainly private agricultural land plots with some 10-15% of PAFs as residential structure which is to be subsumed under the Direct Impact Zone. 12. The total area of land to be acquired for the project is 87.8624 Hectares. Almost the entire land is currently used for the purposes of agriculture. The change in land use, from agricultural to transport, specifically for the purposes of establishing Delhi-Mumbai corridor has been granted by the government of Uttar Pradesh. 13. The agricultural lands are irrigated lands in the four demarcated villages ‘Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla’ located in Tehsil Dadri. The landholding pattern indicates that majority of the landholders are small and marginal farmers. This also resonates with the district level data. 14. The land though is use for agricultural purpose primarily however there are few residential structures and livestock cottages in the land. The PAFs use these livestock for milking and dairy purpose which is a major source of income for them. 15. The gender distribution of PAPs is not deviated on one side. However the landowners are primarily male members of the family. The females though almost equal in number is not the earning member of the family and they are primarily engaged in household activities. All the PAFs are Hindu by religion. There is a significant presence of other backward classes with a small presence of scheduled castes and negligible presence of scheduled tribes in the project impact area.

16. A large percentage of the population falls substantially in the range of upto 35 years indicating that the project affected households have a significant number of young, employable as well as dependent population. 17. The youth (19-35 years) of the project affected area of the four villages consist of a substantial population which is 32.54%. During SIMP, it is important to engage this youth in various jobs according to their educational profile and skill levels. They can be employed as per their competency and qualification. 18. The overall level of literacy of the area is high with 72% being literate. A substantial population is well educated at primary and secondary level with a good number of graduates and few postgraduates. Women record lower levels of literacy as compared to the men. 19. The income level of the affected population is low with major proportion (36.45%) belonging to up to Rs 4000/- per month, given the small size of land holdings. And also 16.5% of them have no stable income. The occupational data also shows that a large number of the people are dependent on their lands for their livelihood- farming and allied work, there are only a few who have listed their occupations and source of income from private services and government services. 20. Women’s occupation and income levels remain behind in the data collected. This could be due to the fact that women work on their own farms, and rarely go out to earn. Women’s occupation has mostly been recorded as housewives, as their labor within the house and on their fields is not reflected as paid work. 21. Nearly two-third of the population lies in the category of APL whereas some of them (25.91%) are also availing ‘Antyodaya Scheme’. There are a few households which are headed by single or widowed women, which were also mentioned in the course of community consultations. 22. For the purpose of SIMP, it is significant to note that a 27% of PAPs are engaged at the Elementary Occupation level (i.e. Skill I level) and almost 51% of them are engaged at 6th category level-Skilled Agricultural and Animal Husbandry (i.e. Skill II level) and around 22% of them are engaged at 4th & 5th Category level – Clerks and as Service Workers and Shop & Market Sales Workers (i.e. Skill II

level) as defined by NCO-2015 report. It is thereby important to constructively engage them in the prospective employment as per their skills and education. 23. The women in DIZ are highly vulnerable, owing to their illiteracy and status of non-working population. For SIMP, their hidden skills need to be identified and required training may be imparted for their social upliftment. 24. The Social Impact Management Plan should thereby ensure a livelihood mapping exercise, to ascertain the type of skill required in the area of PAPs for the jobs that would be created. For the purpose, a comprehensive survey should be conducted to identify the people who want to participate in livelihood and skill development training and thereby categorizing their areas of interest to find the suitable and courses and classes. The agency may also identify suitable training institutes, classes, and organizations in the vicinity of the project affected area as extended support to PAPs. 25. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority should facilitate the inclusion of PAPs in the government-sponsored poverty alleviation program in the area as per the eligibility criteria of each program. GNIDA may also facilitate training for skills development. There should be a strong emphasis on imparting vocational training to the unskilled youth by collaborating with the institutions providing vocational training and government schemes such as Skill Development Mission. 26. Moreover, during the implementation of the project, skills training, and job opportunities could be offered to PAFs. The PAFs can also be engaged in the allied agriculture activities such as dairy, poultry, cattle rearing, etc. which will also take care of the existing live-stock of PAFs. 27. The project should also focus on helping the PAFs in providing opportunities for quality education with the help of various organizations such as Satyam Foundations Sarvodaya Educational and Welfare Society etc. that will make them eligible for long-term employment and will contribute to poverty alleviation of PAFs.

2. Detailed Project Description1 2.1 Introduction The DMIC project was launched in pursuance of an MOU signed between the Government of India and the Government of Japan in December 2006. DMIC Development Corporation (DMICDC) incorporated in 2008, is the implementing agency for the project. DMICDC has been registered as a company with 49% equity of Government of India, 26% equity of the JBIC and the remaining held by government financial institutions. The Japanese Government had also announced financial support for DMIC project to an extent of US$ 4.5 billion in the first phase for the projects with Japanese participation involving cutting edge technology. Government of India took the lead in developing Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) Project on the backbone of Western Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) between Delhi and Mumbai covering an overall length of 1504 km and passing through the States of U.P, Delhi NCR, Haryana, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Maharashtra, with end terminals at Dadri in the Delhi NCR and Jawaharlal Nehru Port (JNPT) near Mumbai. The influence region for DMIC includes the States of U.P, Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Maharashtra.  The project spans the States of Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Maharashtra along the Western Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) of the railways. Initially, 8 nodes/cities in the six DMIC states have been taken up for development.

 Land has been transferred to the SPVs by the concerned State Governments. Matching equity by DMIC trust has been released to the SPVs.

 Master Planning, Environment Clearance and legal framework, authorizing power to SPVs have been completed.

 Work on Trunk Infrastructure packages which includes Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP), Administrative Business Centre (ABC), Water Treatment Plant

1 Source: Extrapolated from https://www.dmicdc.com/about-DMICDC

(WTP), Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) and Roads and Services are ready to commence after finalization of tenders which have already been floated. extrapolate Thereafter, looking at the progress of DMIC Project, Govt. of India announced other Industrial Corridor Projects and accordingly, in December 2016, the mandate for DMIC Trust was expanded to include all other industrial corridors across India namely: 1. Amritsar Kolkata Industrial Corridor (AKIC) 2. Chennai Bengaluru Industrial Corridor (CBIC) 3. East Coast Economic Corridor (ECEC) with Vizag Chennai Industrial Corridor (VCIC) as Phase 1 4. Bengaluru Mumbai Industrial Corridor (BMIC)

The DMIC Trust was accordingly renamed as National Industrial Corridor Development and Implementation Trust (NICDIT) and future corridors, if any will also be developed and implemented by NICDIT.

Image Source: [https://www.iitgnl.com/gnl-content/overview]

2.1.1 DMIC-Details and Project Site2

Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) is a flagship program of the Government of India aiming to develop “Futuristic Smart Industrial Cities” and converging next generation technologies across infrastructure sectors.

DMIC is being developed along with the Western Dedicated Freight Corridor (WDFC). DFCCIL, a Ministry of Railways, Government of India enterprise, is developing WDFC, which passes through the states of Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Maharashtra, having end terminals at Dadri in the Uttar Pradesh and Jawaharlal Nehru Port (JNPT) near Mumbai, Maharashtra. The Dedicated Fright Corridor offers high-speed connectivity for High Axle Load Wagons supported by high power locomotives. DMIC will leverage the High Speed – High Capacity connectivity of WDFC.

In the first phase of DMIC eight new industrial cities are being developed across six states- Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Maharashtra. In the state of Uttar Pradesh, Dadri-Noida-Ghaziabad Investment Region is being developed under the DMIC. This investment region is located within 50 km from the alignment of Dedicated Freight Corridor and the nearest metropolitan region is Delhi, the National Capital of India.

Under the Dadri-Ghaziabad-Noida Investment Region of DMIC, following three Early Bird Projects are being developed:

A. Integrated Industrial Township at Greater Noida B. Multi Modal Logistic Hub (Freight Village) at Dadri, Greater Noida and C. Multi Modal Transport Hub at Boraki, Greater Noida

2 Source: Extrapolated form https://www.iitgnl.com/gnl-content/overview 10

Image Source: https://www.dmicdc.com/about-DMICDC

2.1.2 Rationale of the DMIC Project: The objective of DMIC is to expand India’s Manufacturing & Services base and develop DMIC as a “Global Manufacturing and Trading Hub”. It will provide a major impetus to planned urbanization in India with manufacturing as the key driver. In addition to new Industrial Cities, it envisages development of infrastructure linkages like power plants, assured water supply, high capacity transportation and logistics facilities as well as softer interventions like skill development programme for employment of the local populace. The Project intends to trigger developmental activities in the Greater Noida region and to attract local and global investments. The area shall also help in building confidence in the market bringing the efforts of the past half-a-decade to fruition.

A. Integrated Industrial Township at Greater Noida3 The Integrated Industrial Township at Greater Noida, being a flagship project for Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor has been designed with world class standards envisioned as a sustainable and smart community. The new-age community in the making draws a balance between functionality and aesthetics. Signature buildings and vibrant public realm are supported by smart infrastructure components to ensure a futuristic township.

A site of 302.63ha has been developed for the “Integrated Industrial Township (IIT)” under Dadri-Noida-Ghaziabad Investment Region of DMIC to facilitate large scale investments for the commercial and industrial development expected in DMIC region. The site is located at a road distance of 11 km from Pari Chowk, Greater Noida. The site abuts the Delhi-Howrah Railway line and Ajayabpur Railway station is situated near the eastern periphery of the site and proposed Eastern Peripheral Expressway is abutting southern boundary of the project site. The aerial distance of the Sikanderpur (South east) town and NH- 91 (North East) are approximately 10km and 6km respectively. The Dadri railway junction is also located approx. 9.5Km from

3 https://www.iitgnl.com/gnl-content/iit 12

the project site. As per the Greater Noida master plan, Sector Road of 80 m width on North and 60m wide Sector Road on the West side are proposed. The proposed Integrated Industrial Township is approximately 35km from Noida City which is one of the significant industrial cities of the region and a major catchment for skilled human resources beneficial for this upcoming development. The site is also in proximity to other major proposed landmark developments of the region such as the integrated transit facility at Boraki (approx. 4km) and the multi modal logistics hub near Dadri (approx. 6km) that is likely to improve both the passenger and logistics connectivity/movement to this industrial township.

B. Multi Modal Logistic Hub (Freight Village) at Dadri4 This Freight Village planned at Dadri is envisaged to function as a dry port supplementing not just the storage, aggregation and export/import of industrial freight in the region but also provide value added services that shall allow for finishing of goods within the facility alongside commercial space to host the freight companies. An integrated facility with all logistics infrastructure under one roof is expected to boost the economic environment of the DMIC region to enable it to compete successfully in the world marketplace. A design report has been prepared based on the traffic projected for this entity as also the survey report made available by the project client. This Freight Village project makes it an opportunity for the Client and the Concessionaire to develop it as a commercially viable proposition.

The proposed Freight Village site is located in Dadri Tehsil of Gautam Budh Nagar of Uttar Pradesh. The site is in close proximity of Delhi-Howrah Broad Gauge line in the south west and NH 91 in North West. The UP Government has already initiated the land acquisition process. The site identified for Freight Village located in Dadri Tehsil in the planning boundaries of the city of Greater Noida and its extension. The area indicated is earmarked for the Freight Village plot of 295.44 Ha in addition to the area of 48.49 Ha for a railway flyover as the approach track to the Freight Village

4 Source: Detailed Project Report for Multi Modal Logistics Hub (MMLH)/ Freight Village and Multi Modal Transport Hub (MMTH) at Greater Noida in Uttar Pradesh under DMIC Project submitted on 12th February 2018 to Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor Development Corporation Limited 13

site. It sums up to the overall land area proposed for the facility which is 343.93 Ha. The site of the Freight Village comprises of an area of about 343.93 Ha (849.87acres) placed between NH-91 in the north-west and the Delhi-Howrah Broad Gauge line in the south-west and an additional area of about 145.1 Ha (358.56 acres) between NH- 91and Eastern Peripheral Expressway (EPE) earmarked for future expansion.

[For detailed design information and descriptions, see the Project Report for Multi Modal Logistics Hub (MMLH)/ Freight Village and Multi Modal Transport Hub (MMTH) at Greater Noida in Uttar Pradesh under DMIC Project submitted on 12th February 2018 to Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor Development Corporation Limited]

The development of the Project Area has the following objectives:

i. This DMICDC project envisages development of new industrial cities as ‘smart cities’ and converging new generation technologies across infrastructure sectors and shall set a benchmark for further development in the Greater Noida region showcasing the principles of sustainability by providing a world-class destination for industries;

ii. To act as a catalyst for further development in the Project Area attracting

investments from private and public sector alike by providing a development that is scalable; and

iii. This proposed Freight Village at Dadri will serve as a dry port having facilities for not just storage, aggregation and export/import of industrial freight in the region but also value added services such as banking, insurance, shipping, simple assembly etc. as also other activities related to finishing of goods within the facility alongside commercial space to host freight companies.

C. Multi Modal Transport Hub at Bodaki, Greater Noida The MMTH at Greater Noida has been planned with the key objective to create a world-class intermodal transport station with provision of international level facilities incorporating the Rail, Road and MRTS accessibility for the passengers, in a seamless manner. The prime objectives associated with the proposed project are:

I. To strengthen the link between various modes of transport present in close proximity, thus achieving the ultimate goal of a multi-modal interchange that combines various modes and their associated functions in order to achieve a better degree of transport network

II. Encourage integrated development of traffic movement & networks, transportation facilities & their linkages and associated functions/ activities prompting land use modifications to suit the context of the development

III. To provide world-class passenger movement facilities for the growing population of the catchment zone catering to upcoming developments in the UP Sub-Region of the NCR

IV. Development of transit facilities as per user rate, multiple mode linking and passenger comfort and affordability

V. To have a holistic approach to commercial bases and their delineation along avenues of relevantly related freight movement and logistics

VI. To promote single land use zones to facilitate correlativity between the various activities that are related to transport and traffic networking

VII. To increase location efficiency by boosting transit ridership and minimizing the traffic congestion within the region

VIII.To improve efficiency of station operations and services to passengers for the increasing future passenger demand through modernization and expansion of existing station facilities at Greater Noida

IX. To act as a catalyst for fueling growth within the investment region by improving connectivity, providing accessibility, increasing efficiency and safety in a way that benefits the entire region. The MMTH is planned across an area of ~145 Ha (gross area). It will be bound by Boraki Railway station to its west, the Integrated Industrial Township on the south- east, Greater Noida area on the south, and NH 91 towards the north-west. The proposed MMTH area (as defined below) has been divided into two distinct land parcels Zone I & Zone II, by the Indian Railways/ Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) tracks on the Delhi – Howrah route. The MMTH besides the above zones also proposes to have a New Boraki Terminal station and a coach maintenance yard for the Indian Railways. These have been planned in consultation with

2.2 Screening and Scoping of the SIA: i. The study screens out “no significant impact” from those with significant impact and get a broad picture of the nature, scale and magnitude of the issues. ii. This is an initial assessment of likely impact and not meant to determine the level of impact. It has only identified all of the issues and affected groups. iii. It attempts to identify key social issues associated with proposed project and specifies the project's social development outcomes. iv. The study has taken into account various project components and the likely impact in terms of land acquisition (loss of houses, livelihood, etc.), and resultant involuntary resettlement and provide input (in term of magnitude of impacts and likely costs for mitigation) in preparing appropriate mitigation plans. v. The proposed land being acquired is mainly an agricultural land and has no significant community assets (e.g. school, community assets) including the religious structures and common property resources (e.g. forest, garaging land) the impacts of their loss on local population.

The land area proposed to be acquired for DMIC Project in this phase at four villages for which this SIA study has been conducted is given below:

District Tehsil Village Acquisition Area (Hectare)

Chamrawli Bodaki 12.5922 ha

Chithehra 47.5162 ha Gautam Budh Dadri Nagar Katehra 4.4672 ha

Palla 23.2868 ha

In order to ensure a humanitarian, participative, informed and transparent process for land acquisition for development of infrastructure facilities, “The Right to Fair

Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013” was introduced by the Government of India. As required under section 109 to 112 of the given Act, Government of Uttar Pradesh (Govt. UP) issued “The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Uttar Pradesh) Rules, 2016 (RFCTLARR- UP)”.The study has taken reference from there and is conducted in the same policy framework.

3. Approach and Methodology for the SIA 3.1. Description of the Social Impact Assessment The DMIC project is viable only by addressing vulnerability and financial security of the population residing in the project affected area. In an ideal situation, any project should not have any adverse effect on the population around however this is not possible in entirety. The proposed Dadri-Ghaziabad-Noida Investment Region of DMIC that includes three Early Bird Projects namely Integrated Industrial Township at Greater Noida, Multi Modal Logistic Hub (Freight Village) at Dadri, Greater Noida and Multi Modal Transport Hub at Boraki, Greater Noida will cause involuntary resettlement of the PAFs across the four villages (Chamrawali Bodaki, Chithehra, Katehra and Palla) that are being subsumed under this phase of land area acquisition. However, the government is determined to address the security and financial concerns of the PAFs of the four villages under the provisions of the law to the great extent. Thereby, a social impact assessment is carried out to assess the socio economic conditions of the PAFs and arrive at the estimate of the losses that they will be compromising of in terms of: a) Assets- movable and immovable; b) Loss of livelihood opportunities; c) Social structures with places of religious, symbolic or cultural significance. The SIA report may further be used for putting together the resettlement action plan to mitigate the adverse impacts of the affected population. A comprehensive Social impact management plan (SIMP) has also been carried out to make rehabilitation plan of PAPs after extensive stakeholder consultation.

The SIA report is essential and valuable in comprehending the existing social fabric amongst the affected population and this can help in developing the subsequent effective R&R plan. As per the RFCTLARR (UP) Rules, 2016, any infrastructural project proposing the acquisition of land from the project affected families is required to make adequate provisions for the PAFs in a way that ensures the improvement in their social as well economic status post acquisition. A comprehensive social impact assessment is the primary step towards assuring the same.

3.2 Rationale and Objective of the SIA The overall objective of the Social impact assessment is to ensure that the project addresses the adverse impact on the livelihood of the people and that nobody is left worse off after implementing resettlement action plan and those affected have access to project benefits, both during the project construction as well as operation. The aim of the study is to address the issues of the Identified Stakeholders in terms of directly or indirectly and positively and negatively affected PAFs; vulnerable groups; PAFs, who might have an interest or feel that they are affected; affected population whose cooperation, expertise, or influence would be helpful to the success of the project.

The socio-economic report for this project undertakes preliminary investigation for determination of social impact and public purpose in relation to proposed acquisition of land required for development & construction of the project and for preparation of Social Impact Management Plan in order to establish that the potential benefits and the public purpose for the proposed acquisitions shall outweigh the social costs and adverse social impact as determined by the Social Impact Assessment.

3.3 The Research Methodology The SIA undertakes this study in line with the rules as defined in the “The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement (Uttar Pradesh) Rules, 2016”. The methodology adopted to assess the impact includes both qualitative and quantitative methods. The quantitative data

collection was done through structured socio-economic survey which incorporated all the demographic details as well as the vulnerability status of project affected people. The qualitative approach incorporates the primary information gathered through site reconnaissance, community consultations, observations and focus group discussions with PAFs in order to gather the necessary information on existing demographic, socio-economic and cultural conditions in the required project area and to develop a baseline for the survey.

3.3.1 Data needs and Information requirements The land to be acquired consists of four villages namely Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara-Katehra,-Palla in the Dadri district, UP. There are 58 Gatas in Chamrawali Bodaki, 141 in Chitehara, 19 in Katehara and 75 Gatas in Palla to be acquired under the project which makes a total Gata count of 293 with a total land mass of 87.8624 hectares spread as 12.5922 ha in Chamrawali Bodaki, 47.5162 ha in Chitehara, 4.4672 ha in Katehara and 23.2868 ha in Palla. The data needed a census survey in order to conduct the Social Impact Analysis of the Project affected families (PAFs).

3.3.2 Data collection The data collection continued for over two and a half months with regular visits and contacts with the PAFs. Out of 293 Gatas in all, majority of the respondents were very supportive and active in sharing the information required. A few of them chose not to respond to the structured questionnaire however they were actively engaged in discussions and sharing of their apprehensions and concerns regarding the project and ongoing survey activities. Their responses were noted and duly incorporated in the preparation of this report.

The data collection was done in two phases for the quantitative as well as qualitative data requirements. For the detailed quantitative analysis, The SIA team visited the four villages (Gautam Budh Nagar District) and surveyed the area that would be affected by the project (both directly and indirectly). The primary survey was conducted through structured questionnaire to gather the geographic and socio-

economic details of the PAFs of the project affected area which provided first hand insights of the actual livelihood of the affected people and helped to understand the geographic limits of the area and the people living there in a better way.

For the qualitative analysis, the SIA team conducted Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with the project affected families.

3.4 Tools Used to Collect Information

Since the methodology adopted is both qualitative and quantitative on nature, the tools required are detailed as follows:

3.4.1 Socio-Economic Survey

For the quantitative study, socio-economic survey was developed to assess the social and economic impacts on PAPs of the four villages. The primary survey was conducted among the families (PAFs) and the family members (PAPs) affected by the proposed project.

The survey was carried out by using a structured Socio-economic survey format. This survey was conducted to generate baseline information on socio-economic conditions of the PAFs and PAPs and also to assess the extent of impacts due to proposed project. The survey was administered to the head of the household preferably; otherwise an adult member of the household was requested to provide the responses. The socio-economic questionnaire was developed keeping in view the aims and objectives and baseline data needed for assessing the socio-economic conditions of project affected persons with specific concerns to vulnerable sections of the society (SC, ST, Women headed households, Disabled, Elderly Persons, etc.) for monitoring the status of project affected people during and after the implementation of project, if any. The socio-economic questionnaire format also covered the thematic areas as per Form III of the RFCTLARR (UP) Rules, 2016.

The survey questionnaire to assess Social Impact of PAFs was based on Tendulkar Committee (2009) which was conceptualized as: people’s way of life, their culture,

their community, their political systems, their environment, their health and wellbeing, their personal and property rights, their fears and aspirations.

The detailed survey questionnaire consisted of 10 parts. The socio-economic survey format covered data generation through the following sections:

. Demographic details of the project affected families- PAFs . Kinship, education and occupation patterns of the project affected people (all the members of the affected families)- PAPs . Land ownership/use and livelihood . Trees and Crops details and patterns . Poverty levels and vulnerable groups . Quality of life (potable water, toilets, electricity etc.) . Common resources and public amenities

Finally, the structured survey also collected the data about the perceived impact on land, livelihood and income; physical resources; private assets, public services and utilities etc. The questionnaire also focused on determining the vulnerability of PAFs due to their land being acquired for the project. As per Tendulkar Committee report (2009), vulnerability is defined as the diminished capacity of an individual or group to anticipate, cope with, resist and recover from the impact that is caused either due to man-made or natural hazard. Physical, economic, social and political factors determine the level of vulnerability among people. Examples of potentially vulnerable groups include displaced population, migrants, returnees, young children, dependent women, widows, elderly people and disabled persons. The vulnerability thus developed for the questionnaire addressed the Physical Vulnerability, Economic Vulnerability, Social Vulnerability as well as Emotional Vulnerability of the PAFs. The structured socio-economic survey thus developed was distributed in person among the PAFs of the four villages.

3.4.2. Community Stakeholder Consultations and FGDs In order to support the quantitative findings, the detailed discussions were held with community stakeholders and various focus group discussions were conducted to get the primary feel and understanding of PAPS in relation to proposed project. The main objectives of these consultations were to promote public understanding of the proposed project and find out meaningful solutions of developmental issues such as local needs and problems, loss of livelihoods, impact on religious structures, alternatives, resettlement issues, etc. The community consultations were aimed at generating data pertaining to the entire community, as perceived by the people of these communities and their concerns regarding the proposed project.

The FGDs were conducted after the socio-economic survey, in order to understand the backgrounds and demographic composition of the PAPs, so as to have a better understanding of their perceptions. The visits were announced ahead of time, so that the project affected people had ample time to schedule and respond to the surveyor.

In addition, spot consultations in groups and individual consultations were also held at several places during the field survey work. Outcome of the consultations was shared with the design team for integrating the social concerns wherever feasible.

3.4.3 Overview of Information and Data Sources Used

Information for the report was collected from both primary and secondary sources. Primary source of data collection included the survey and stakeholder consultations. The secondary sources of data are listed below: . Primary census data highlights for Uttar Pradesh- Census 2011 (http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/PCA/PCA_Highlights/PCA_High lights_UP.html) . District Census handbook, Gautam Budh Nagar; ‘Village and Town wise Primary Census Abstract’ (http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/0910_PART_B_DCHB_GAUTA M%20BUDDHA%20NAGAR.pdf)

. Agriculture Census Data 2010- 11 (http://agcensus.dacnet.nic.in/statesummarytype.aspx) . Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 . Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Uttar Pradesh) Rules, 2016 . Land Records from the Revenue Department . Project Report for Multi Modal Logistics Hub (MMLH)/ Freight Village and Multi Modal Transport Hub (MMTH) at Greater Noida in Uttar Pradesh under DMIC Project submitted on 12th February 2018 to Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor Development Corporation Limited . https://www.dmicdc.com/about-DMICDC . https://www.iitgnl.com/gnl-content/overview . Source: Census, 2011 (https://www.censusindia2011.com/uttar- pradesh/gautam-buddha-nagar/dadri-population)

. District Census Handbook, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, The Census of India 2011 [Series 10, Part XII-A] Pages: 44-51

3.5. The SIA Team and their Area of Expertise

The team responsible for conducting the Social Impact Assessment and for formulating the SIA report is as follows:

1. Prof. N. P. Melkania (Environmental Sciences) Chairperson 2. Dr. Om Prakash (Language and Content Writing) Member 3. Dr. Manisha Sharma (Statistics & Operations) Member 4. Dr. Vinod Kumar Shanwal (Education) Member 5. Dr. Rakesh Kumar Srivastava (Finance & Economics) Member 6. Dr. Vivek Kumar Mishra (Political Science) Member 7. Dr. Prakash Chandra Dilare (Sociology) Member

3.6. Schedule of the Study and Consultation with Stakeholders

S. No. Date Place Meeting and Consultation

The letter received from the DM/ADM- Greater Noida 1. 22.05.2020 LA vide 8023/08-ADM-LA/Greater ADM-LA Office Noida/Gautam Budh Nagar GBU Meeting with Greater Noida Authority 2. 30.05.2020 Greater Noida in the Office of the Nodal Officer GBU Notification of the constituting of the 3 11.06.2020 Greater Noida SIA Team GBU Meeting of the SIA Team in the Office 4 12.06.2020 Greater Noida of the Chairperson Greater Noida Submission of the Terms of 5 26.06.2020 ADM-LA Office Reference to the approving authority 6 27.06.2020 Lucknow Approval of the ToR Pre-survey work begins in GBU 7 28.06.2020 consultations with the concerned Greater Noida Tehsildar and Lekhpal of Dadri Tehsil GBU Meeting with the SDM in the Office of 8 09.07.2020 Greater Noida the Nodal Officer GBU SIA Team meeting and review of the 9 14.07.2020 Greater Noida work in the Office of the Chairperson GBU Final Questionnaires ready and 10 16.07.2020 Greater Noida reviewed Site Visit (Chamrawli Bodaki and 11 24.07.2020 Dadri Tehsil Palla) 12 25.07.2020 Dadri Tehsil Site Visit (Kathehra and Chithehra) 26.07.2020 Site Visit for FGD and Data 13 Dadri Tehsil onwards Collection 01.10.2020 Site Visit for FGD and Validating of 14 Dadri Tehsil onwards the Data GBU 15 25.10.2020 Compilation of Data and Analysis Greater Noida GBU Draft of Report submitted for the 16 12.11.2020 Greater Noida scheduling of Public Hearing

4. Socio-Economic profile of Impact Zone

4.1. Overview of UP and Project Influence Area The project is located in the Dadri Tehsil of Gautam Budh Nagar, District of Uttar Pradesh. Uttar Pradesh is located in the northern part of the country, between 77°3’E to 84°39’E longitudes and 23°52’N to 30°28’N latitudes. In terms of area it is the fourth largest state in India and covers an area of about 2,40,928 sq. km, which accounts for 9 percent of the total area and 16.5 per cent of the population of the country. The State is bound on the west by Rajasthan, Haryana and Delhi to the north-west, Uttarakhand and the country of Nepal to the north, Bihar to the east, Madhya Pradesh to the south and touches the states of Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh to the south east. The State is organized into 75/83 districts, and 307/316 tehsils and 821/901 development blocks. About 78% of the total population of the state resides in rural areas. An overview of the State is presented below in Table 4.1:

Table 4.1: Overview of Uttar Pradesh Indicators Area (Sq. km) 240928 Household (No.) 33448035 Total Population 199812341 Rural Population (%) 77.7 Urban Population (%) 22.3 SC Population (%) 20.7 ST Population (%) 0.6 Sex ratio (females/1000 males) 912 Overall Literacy (%) 67.7 Female Literacy (%) 57.2 Contribution to Gross State Agriculture and allied (%) 16.6 Domestic Product (2013-14) Agriculture (%) 15.0 Industry (%) 16.2 Mining and Quarrying (%) 0.7

Manufacturing (%) 9.0 Services (%) 42.5 Annual Rainfall (average mm) 990 Workforce Participation rate (%) 32.9 Male workers (%) 75.7 Female workers (%) 24.3 Main workers (%) 67.8 Marginal workers (%) 32.2 Source: Census, 2011 (Has been presented according to Census, 2011)

The state of Uttar Pradesh is characterized by the pre-dominance of the agricultural sector with heavy dependence on monsoon, high percentage of marginal and small land holdings, high population pressure, high incidence of poverty, low literacy rate, unemployment and low per capita income, small manufacturing sector. The share of agriculture has been declining, but even then it continues to play a major part of the economy in terms of employment. It employs about 60% of the work force who continue to depend on agriculture and allied activities as a prime source of their livelihood and contributes less than one third of the State income.

Uttar Pradesh is a major food grain producing State in rice, wheat, chickpea and pigeon pea. Sugarcane is the principal commercial crop of the State, largely concentrated in the western and central belts of State. U.P. is also a major producer of vegetables, fruits and potato. The per capita availability of land has been declining with the increase of population. The average size of land holdings in the State is only 0.86 hectare, while 75.4 per cent of holdings are below one hectare.

4.2. Project Influence Area- Dadri Tehsil The proposed project lies in Dadri, a tehsil (block/sub-district) in the Gautam Budh Nagar district, which lies in the western part of Uttar Pradesh. Dadri is located at 28.550°N 77.553°E. It has an average elevation of 216 metres (709 ft). Dadri is a Tehsil located in Gautam Buddha Nagar district of Uttar Pradesh. It is one of 3

Tehsils of Gautam Buddha Nagar district. There are 110 villages and 6 towns in Dadri Tehsil. As per the Census India 2011, Dadri Tehsil has 234537 households, population of 1110093 of which 601465 are males and 508628 are females. The population of children between age 0-6 is 160174 which is 14.43% of total population. The sex-ratio of Dadri Tehsil is around 846 compared to 912 which is average of Uttar Pradesh state. The literacy rate of Dadri Tehsil is 70.97% out of which 76.72% males are literate and 64.17% females are literate. The total area of Dadri is 578.97 sq.km with population density of 1917 per sq.km. Out of total population, 29.46% of population lives in Urban area and 70.54% lives in Rural area. There are 10.26% Scheduled Caste (SC) and 0.2% Scheduled Tribe (ST) of total population in Dadri Tehsil.

Table 4.2: Overview of Dadri Tehsil5 Indicators Details Geographical Location and Coordinates Latitude 28.550°N Longitude 77.553°E Number of Households 234537 Population 1110093 Male Population 601465 (54.18%) Female Population 508628 (45.82%) Children Population 160174 Area 578.97 km2 Population density/km2 1917 Sex-ratio 846 Literacy 70.97% Male Literacy 76.72% Female Literacy 64.17% Scheduled Tribes (ST) % 0.2% Scheduled Caste (SC) % 10.26%

5 https://www.censusindia2011.com/uttar-pradesh/gautam-buddha-nagar/dadri-population.html 30

Dadri Urban & Rural Population: Out of total population, 50% of population lives in Urban area and 60% lives in Rural area Number of households 180714 53823 Total Population 783094 326999 Population (%) 54.63% 46.88% Male Population 427766 173699 Female Population 355328 153300 Sex Ratio 831 883 Literacy (%) 73.35% 65.29%

Table 4.3: Number and Percentage of Main Workers, Marginal Workers, and Non- Workers by Sex in Dadri Tehsil, Census 2011

Total workers Marginal Persons Main workers (Main and Non workers Total workers / Males / marginal) population Females Number % Number % Number % Number %

Persons 1110093 327863 29.53 65044 5.86 392907 35.39 717186 64.61

Males 601465 269586 44.82 40113 6.67 309699 51.49 291766 48.51

Females 508628 58277 11.46 24931 4.90 83208 16.36 425420 83.64

Table 4.4: Distribution of Workers by Sex in Four Categories of Economic Activity in Dadri Tehsil, Census 2011

Persons / Total Total number Category of workers Males / Population of workers Females (Main + Cultivators Agricultural Household Other Marginal) Labourers Industry workers workers Persons 1110093 392907 27760 18250 21594 325303 (35.39) (7.07) (4.64) (5.50) (82.79) Males 601465 309699 22037 14028 14874 258760 (51.49) (7.12) (4.53) (4.80) (83.55) Females 508628 83208 5723 4222 6720 66543 (16.36) (6.88) (5.07) (8.08) (79.97)

Table 4.5: Distribution of Villages according to availability of Different Amenities in Dadri Tehsil, Census 2011

Number Type of amenity available Type of amenity available

inhabited

villages

Office

Transport

Banks

Power

supply

drinking water

Post

Improved

Agricultural Credit Societies

Telephone

Medical Approach by pucca road

Education 71 67 52 69 17 71 28 6 3 69 69 % (94.37) (73.24) (97.18) (23.94) (100) (39.44) (8.45) (4.23) (97.18) (97.18)

TABLE 4.6: Number and Percent of Rural Population served by Different Amenities in Dadri Tehsil, Census 2011

Total Type of amenity Type of amenity available population available

inhabited

villages

Education

Transport

Power

Post Office

supply

drinking

water

Telephone

Improved

Medical Agricultural Credit Societies Approach by pucca road

Banks 194979 194790 165788 194973 90028 194979 107760 42290 12492 192534 194973 (99.9) (85.03) (100) (46.17) (100) (55.27) (21.69) (6.41) (98.75) (100)

Source: Census, 2011 (https://www.censusindia2011.com/uttar-pradesh/gautam-buddha- nagar/dadri-population), and District Census Handbook, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, The Census of India 2011 [Series 10, Part XII-A] Pages: 44-51

4.3. Socio-economic Profile of Direct Impact Zone

This section presents an overview of the four villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” that is going to be affected by the proposed project. The following table provides a combined summary of data about the project affected village as per census 2011 and compiled by SIA report.

Table 4.7: Overview of villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla”

Indicators No. of Households 293 Population (No.) 2548

Male (%) 53.02 Female (%) 46.98 SC (%) 0.51 ST (%) 0.26 OBC (%) 92.80 Sex Ratio (females/1000males) 886 Overall Literacy (above 6 years) (%) 82.00 Male - % 91.6 Female - % 73.0 Total Workers (%) 28.23 Total Workers (Male) - % 37.67 Total Workers (Female) - % 00.00 Main Workers (as % of Total Workers) 62.24 Agriculture Cultivator - % 37.00 Business - % 6.00 Government Service - % 7.00 Distribution of main Private Service -% 13.00 workers - % Artisan - % 5.00 Labour - % 6.00 Agriculture Labour - % 7.00 Unemployed - % 19.00 Marginal workers (as % of total workers) 37.76 Agriculture Cultivator - % 22.00 Artisan - % 2.00 Distribution of marginal Labour - % 5.00 workers - % Agriculture Labour - % 34.00 Unemployed - % 37.00

The sex ratio in DIZ of “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” is 886 that are lower than that of Dadri Tehsil 877 and remarkably lower than the state number of 912 females per thousand males. Female work force participation is

almost nil, although they contribute in house hold and agricultures activity but not earners in the family. Overall the unemployment rate is very high which is 36.8% amongst main workers and 37% amongst marginal workers. A substantial population is engaged in as self-Agriculture cultivator which is 37% amongst main workers and 34% amongst marginal workers as Agriculture Labour. The area consists of very thin 0.51% of scheduled castes and an almost nil population of scheduled tribes as 0.26%, as according to the 2011 census data and also observed by survey, its largely have around 92.8% OBC population in the project affected area.

5. Land Assessment of the PAFs

5.1 Land Holdings in Chamrawali Bodaki - Chitehara – Katehara – Palla The land holdings of the PAPs range from less than half a hectare up to above 3 hectares. The majority of the land holders are consolidated within the bracket of 0 to 1 hectare. As per the RFCTLARR Act, 2013, marginal farmers in irrigated land are defined as those having holdings below 0.5 Ha and small farmers as those with holdings between 0.5 to 1 Ha. As can be seen, from the table 5.1, there are large numbers about 82.59 percentage of landholders who are marginal and merely 12.97% of the landholders can be categorized as small farmers. As per the village Land Records and household (Annexed), the landholdings for Gautam Budh Nagar district, almost 88.82 % of agricultural holdings can be categorized as marginal and small farmers, which is almost in similar pattern as distribution found in India across and in Uttar Pradesh as per Agriculture Census 2015-16. The average land holding in the district is 0.83 hectares as per the 2011 agriculture census.

Table 5.1: Distribution of Land holding amongst PAFs Area of Land Holding Percentage

0-0.5 Hectare (Marginal) 82.59 0.5 -1 Hectare (small) 12.97 1-2 Hectare 04.09 2-4 Hectare 0.34 > 4 Hectare Nil Source: Primary Survey undertaken in September – October 2020

As per, Agriculture Census 2015-16 (6th August 2019) All India Report, the small and marginal holdings taken together (0.00-2.00 ha.) constitute 86.08%, the Semi- medium and Medium operational holdings (2.00-10.00 ha.) is only 13.35% and the large holdings (10.00 ha. & above) is merely 0.57% of total number of holdings in 2015-16.

Percentage distribution of number of operational holdings for All Social Groups (2010-11 & 2015-16) in Uttar Pradesh

Uttar Pradesh Marginal Small Semi Medium Large medium Agriculture Census 79.45 13.01 5.72 1.71 0.11 2010-11 Agriculture Census 80.18 12.63 5.51 1.58 0.10 2015-16

5.2 Land Requirements and Present Land Use The total land required in this phase for the project is 87.8624 Hectares. The proportion of land being acquired is carved out of the four villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” of Dadri Tehsil as mentioned earlier. This change in land use from agricultural to transport for DMIC and MMLT was sanctioned by the Government of Uttar Pradesh in March 2020. The current use of the land is majorly agricultural in nature. Majority of the required land to be acquired from the four villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” consists of private agricultural land plots, almost 100%. As per the revenue records and revenue maps superimposed with the proposed DMIC Project layout, there are a total of 293 land plots or gata sankhya as they are called, that will be subsumed under the Direct Impact Zone. As such, according to the land records, primary survey and revenue records there is marginal amount of land is utilized for structures, drainage and roads, and storage areas like pits for storing manure. 13-15% number of PAPs who hold lands in the direct impact zone reside in the direct impact zone and about 85% of PAPs reside outside of the DIZ.

Fig 5.2.1: Landowners residing outside of the impacted area

Residing status of PAFs in the DIZ

15%

PAFs residing in the DIZ 85% PAFs residing outside the DIZ

5.3. Crops in the Area

The current use of the land is majorly agricultural in nature. The major crops grown are Wheat (40%), Paddy/Rice (32%), Jwar (21%) and followed by Bajra (5%) and other small crops (2%). On average, four crops are grown every year and more than seventy percent of the total land is estimated to be irrigated and remaining used for keeping animals mainly cows/buffalos as animal husbandry is another second major source of income and large number of PAFs involved in animal husbandry. The figure below depicts the Net Sown Area (NSA) of the land:

Figure 5.3: Crop distribution by area

Distribution of major crops

2% Wheat Bajra 32% 40% Jwar

Paddy/Rice

Others 21% 5%

6. Estimation and Enumeration

6.1. Households and Structures Enumeration

The total size of the proposed land for DMIC project, at Dadri in this phase for which this SIA study has been conducted is 87.8624 ha, which mainly consists of agriculture land. The area under DIZ is the proportion of land being acquired is carved out of the four villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” of Dadri Tehsil that consist some residential/commercial or residential cum commercial structure even one school also, as about 13-15% of the PAFs have raised some structure for residential purpose and mainly keeping animals as being in business of animal husbandry, about 5% of the PAFs have raised boundary also, otherwise remaining land is only agricultural plots.

6.2. Typology of Structures in the DIZ

The entire agricultural land includes total 293 gatas or plots with more than 390 claimants with a total population of 2548 people. Along with these, they also have tube-wells for water, boring-wells, and well-structured cowsheds or shelters for animals which are mostly semi-permanent in nature. They also possess cattle mainly buffalo, cows and goats. . 6.3. PAPs in the Direct Impact Zone

Though the plot owners have a total population of 2548 people but the village is not a residential unit. The entire land is used only for the agricultural purpose. However, by the passage of time as the family grows about 13-15% of the PAFs have raised some structure for residential purpose and for keeping animals as being in business of animal husbandry, about 5% of the PAFs have raised boundary also, otherwise remaining land is only agricultural plots. Thereby there is some relocation associated with the people of the village. The percentage of populations according to their ages is given as follows:

PAPs upto 18 PAPs between PAPs between PAPs between PAPs above 60 18-35 35-50 50-60 29.12% 32.54% 22.37% 6.28% 9.69%

The table indicates that a large percentage of the population falls substantially in the range of 18-35 years (32.54% as consolidated) and 29.12% are up to 18 years. This illustrates that the project affected households PAFs/PAPs have a significant number of very young, employable as well as dependent population.

ENUMERATION OF PAPs

VILLAGES CHILDREN < 18 MALES FEMALES TOTAL 1. CHITEHRA 328 477 446 1251 2. KATEHRA 103 93 86 282 3. PALLA 143 180 165 488 4. BODAKI 169 183 175 527 Total no of PAP's 2548

7. Socio-economic profile of PAPs

7.1 Demographic Details of PAPs

The four villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” consists of a total Gatas [58 + 141 + 19 + 75 (respectively) = 293] i.e. Khasra (Plots) with a total area of 87.8624 Ha; however many of the gata has more than one claimants because of the internal division of the family and descendants thereon. Thereby, the total number of claimants or PAFs from the villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” appears to be approximately 389 (as per the Bhulekh Records, Government of Uttar Pradesh) with a total population of 2548. The average household size is 8.69 i.e. 8-9 members per gata number or 6.5 i.e. 6-7 claimant family wise for the direct impact zone.

7.1.1 Age profile of PAFs

A major portion of PAFs belong to 40-60 and 60-80 years, very thin around 4.86% belong to above 80 years.

7.1.2 Gender composition of PAFs

7.1.3Educational profile of PAFs

Educational qualification of PAFs

6% Illiterate 9% 24% Upto 8th std 14% 10th std 12th std

22% Graduation 25% Post Graduation

7.1.4 Social Categories of PAFs

In the distribution of social categories indicates that 92.80% of the PAPs belong to the OBC category, while merely 6.43 % belong to general category. Whereas, the presence of SC and ST category are very thin almost negligible.

7.1.5 Religious profile of PAFs Religious Profile of PAFs

0% Hindu Muslim Sikh Christian Other 100%

As per the findings of the socio-economic survey, only one religions reside in the DIZ with 100% population of Hindu There are no other religions present in the direct impact zone.

7.1.6 Monthly income of PAFs

7.1.7 Source of Income

7.1.7a Agricultural source of income

7.1.7b Non-agricultural source of income

7.2. Demographics Details of PAPs 7.2.1 Gender Composition of Impact Zone The demographic data as shown in graph below indicates that the males constitute 53.02% of the PAPs while females constitute 46.98%. This ratio reflects the marginally low sex ratio that is existent at the district level, as indicated by the 2011 census.

Figure 7.2.1: Gender composition in the DIZ

Source: Primary Survey

7.2.2 Age Groups The bar diagram below shows the age and gender-wise distribution of the PAPs that were surveyed. The highest number of women as well as men fall within the age bracket of 0-18 and 18-35 years of age which signifies that majority of the people in the direct impact zone are of employable age and in their primes.

Figure 7.2.2: Gender wise age profile of PAPs

Source: Primary Survey

The percentage of populations according to their ages is given as follows: PAPs upto 18 PAPs between PAPs between PAPs between PAPs above 60 18-35 35-50 50-60 29.12% 32.54% 22.37% 6.28% 9.69%

The figures indicate that a large percentage of the population falls substantially in the range of upto 35 years (61.66% as consolidated). This illustrates that the project affected households have a significant number of young, employable as well as dependent population.

7.2.3 Literacy Levels The overall educational profile of the DIZ is indicative of a comparatively fair literacy ratio of the four villages in Dadri tehasil. The overall level of literacy of the area is high with 82 % of the population as literate. A substantial population is well educated at primary and secondary level and a good number of graduates is also there. However, the illiteracy ratio still stands tall at 18%.

Figure 7.2.3a: Literacy profile of PAPs

Educational Qualification of PAPs

6% Illiterate 3% 18% Upto 8th 13% 10th 12th 18% 23% Graduate PostGraduate 19% Any other skills

Source: Primary Survey

There exists a gap between the literacy levels of females, which is considerably lower than that of the males in the direct impact zone. The area total of 27.0 % women, who have had no formal education amongst the PAPs in the project impact zone, as compared to the number of illiterate men is approximately 8.41%. However the silver lining is that both men and women have a significant contribution at primary level and upto 8th standard. However, it is significant to note that onwards 10th, 12th and up to Post Graduation the proportion of female decreases as compared to male, indicate that large number of female fail to continue their education after 8th standard. A small amount of the population also has had vocational trainings like fashion, health workers with ASHA or Anganwadis.

Figure 7.2.3b: Gender wise educational profile of PAPs

Source: Primary Survey

7.2.4 Youth Educational Profile

The youth (19-35 years) of the project affected area (the four villages) consist of a substantial population which is 32.54%. During SIMP, it is important to engage this youth in various jobs according to their educational profile and skill levels. Below is the detailed educational youth profile of the PAFs along with stream wise distribution to have a better insight towards their allocation in befitting jobs as per their competency and qualification. Refer figure 7.2.4a and 7.2.4b to 7.2.4c.

Figure 7.2.4a: Youth Literacy Profile of PAFs Youth literacy profile of PAPs

10% 4% 13% Illiterate Upto 8th std

14% Upto 10th std 34% Upto 12th std Graduate Post Graduate 25%

The literacy profile among youth generation of PAFs is good. Only 4% of them are illiterate and an encouraging 34% are graduates. Figure 7.2.4b: Youth Literacy Profile of PAFs – Intermediate stream distribution

In intermediate education 65.45% are from Arts stream and merely 25.33% are from science stream. Only 7.64% have opted Commerce stream.

Figure 7.2.4c: Youth Literacy Profile of PAFs – Graduate stream distribution

The youth graduate population is very diverse from BA degree holders to BSc/Bcom/MBBS and B.Tech. and along with graduation in some vocational stream. Few of the youth (7%) are post graduate as well with a wide range of specializations from MA/MSc/M.Com and even upt o MBA and MS/MD. However, large proportion about 62% from Art stream and very few 4-5% having technical background. Apart from formal education, few of the youth about 6-8 have done computer diploma courses and few of them about 6-8 have also done ITI course.

Figure 7.2.4d: Youth Literacy Profile of PAFs – Post Graduation stream distribution

7.2.5: Occupation and Income Levels

7.2.5a: Occupational distribution of PAPs

Figure 7.2.5a: Occupational distribution of PAPs Occupational distribution of PAPs

19%

37% 7%

6% 5% 6% 13% 7%

Agriculture Cultivator Business Govt. Service Pvt. Service Artisan Labour Agriculture labour Unemployed

Source: Primary Survey In the project affected area of the four Villages, Out of 293 gatas,

The people of this area are engaged in various occupations. The number of households dependent on agriculture and agriculture related activities mainly as crop grower/cultivator, livestock and daily producers/keepers i.e. in animal husbandry and as agricultural labor. There is a nominal number of households doing various private jobs (10-12 %), very few of them are employed with government services as well. Very few PAPs are involved in various artisans’ activities and business & trade. However, a large proportion of about 19% are unemployed. Whereas, women in the project affected area work mostly work at cultivating the lands belonging to their own families, or in allied activities like animal husbandry. They are not earning either formal or informal way, hence income generated by them is not reflected in the survey responses as they are not seen as earning members in their families. Amongst the number of recorded earning members, all of them are males.

National Classification of Occupations-2015 (NCO-2015) - a report of Government of India Ministry of Labour & Employment Directorate General of Employment (www.ncs.gov.in) compatible to ISCO-2008 has a 8 digit coding structure which was mapped and aligned to ISCO-2008. Coding is done as codifying major group, sub-major group, minor group, unit group (family) respectively in order of level of skill required. Broadly there are nine major divisions/classification of jobs.

NCO 2015 Title Skill Level Divisions 1 Legislators, Senior Officials, and Managers Not Defined 2 Professional IV 3 Associate Professionals III 4 Clerks II 5 Service Workers and Shop & Market Sales Workers II 6 Skilled Agricultural and Fishery Workers II 7 Craft and Related Trades Workers II 8 Plant and Machine Operators and Assemblers II 9 Elementary Occupations I Source: National Classification of Occupations-2015

The National Occupational Standards (NOS) is one of the most important contributions of the National Skills Development Corporation (NSDC) to the skills environment of India. This was done in affiliation with the Sector Skill Councils (SSCs). The SSCs are the national partnership organization with NSDC that bring together all the stakeholders – industry, labour, and the academia. ‘Skill’ has been defined as the ability to carry out the tasks and duties of a given job, carrying two dimensions, first is skill level (A function that describes the range of the tasks and duties involved) and second is skill specialization (means the field of knowledge required, the tools and machinery used, the materials worked on, and the kinds of goods and services produced)

The National Skills Qualifications Framework (NSQF) was brought out by National Skill Development Agency. NSQF is based on an outcome-based approach and each level in the NSQF is defined and described in terms of competency levels that need to be achieved. The job roles corresponding to each of these competency levels would be ascertained with the involvement of the industry through the Sector Skill Councils (SSCs). As a competency-based and outcome-based qualification framework, NSQF will facilitate Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL). NSQF will also help to align Indian qualifications to international qualifications. For the purpose of SIMP, it is significant to note that a 27% of PAFs are engaged at the Elementary Occupation level (i.e. Skill I Level) and almost 51% of them are engaged at 6th category level - Skilled Agricultural and Animal Husbandry (i.e. Skill II level) and around 22% of them are engaged at 4th & 5th Category level – Clerks and as Service Workers and Shop & Market Sales Workers (i.e. Skill II level).

7.2.5b: Income Profile of PAPs

The diagram below consolidates the income levels in DIZ. Based on the data collected, it is observed that the income levels of the affected population is low with major proportion earn less than 4000/- month, about 36% of PAPs. Very small population (12.77 %) is earning above in the range of 20,000 – 50,000/- month. An

estimate of the total number of earning members in the area is around 510 out of 2548, i.e. the population dependency ratio is 5:1.

Figure 7.2.5a: Income profile of PAPs (Monthly)

Source: Primary Survey

7.3 Vulnerability Status

The total land required for the project is 87.8624 Hectares carved out of total area of 2105 Hectares of the four villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” Dadri Tehsil, consisting of 293 land plots or gatasankhya mainly private agricultural land plots with some 10-15% of PAFs as residential structure which is to be subsumed under the Direct Impact Zone.

According to the land records and primary survey, the land to be utilized does not occupy any common structures/properties. Further, 85-90% of PAPs who hold lands in the DIZ do not reside there; rather they reside at other places i.e. outside of the DIZ.

It is significant to note that a 27% of PAFs are engaged at the Elementary Occupation level (i.e. Skill I Level) and almost 51% of them are engaged at 6th category level -

Skilled Agricultural and Animal Husbandry (i.e. Skill II level) and around 22% of them are engaged at 4th & 5th Category level – Clerks and as Service Workers and Shop & Market Sales Workers (i.e. Skill II level) as defined by NCO-2015 report. Majority of them are using their land for farming & animal husbandry for their additional source of earning and livelihood along with their engagements in other occupations. Further, the youth (19-35 years) of the project affected area consist of a substantial population which is 32.54%. The literacy profile among youth generation of PAFs is fairly good, although only 5-6% have technical skills and more than 60% from Art stream. Only 4% of them are illiterate and an encouraging 34% are graduates. Even, only 10% of the youth are post-graduates as well with a wide range of specializations from MA/MSc/M.Com and B.Tech. & MBA and even upto MS/MD. Seeing substantial unemployment situation, they may be engaged in various jobs according to their educational profile and skill levels under SIMP.

There is around 4-5% population in the DIZ which fall below the poverty line. They have been allotted BPL card. However, majority of the population lies in the category of APL, and next to them (25-26%) are availing ‘Antyodaya Scheme’. There are a few households which are headed by single or widowed women, which were also mentioned in the course of community consultations.

The socio economic primary survey of the four villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” of Dadri Tehsil that consist some residential/commercial or residential cum commercial structure even one school also, as about 13-15% of the PAFs have raised some structure for residential purpose and mainly keeping animals as being in business of animal husbandry, about 5% of the PAFs have raised boundary also, otherwise remaining land is only agricultural plots, does bring the PAFS with considerable vulnerability for those who are engaged in animal husbandry and have residential structure for their family (10- 15%) and semi-structure house for their animals. Thereby there is some relocation associated with the people of the village.

More than 85% reside outside of DIZs but, The PAFs are majorly depending on agricultural activities and animal husbandry and engaged in various jobs along with a good number of PAFs are well educated, although majorly in Art stream, who want to engage in various employment options as part of compensation brought against the land acquisition. It is expected that the educated and young PAFs will utilize the monetary compensation towards business avenues, higher education and investment. The SIMP will also help towards women empowerment by offering them various skill jobs and uplift their social structure which might eventually motivate the girl child towards education and skill development.

Following are the few descriptions in figure to assess the vulnerability:

7.3.1 Economic Status

7.3.2 Info about Infant Mortality

7.3.2 Family Monthly Income

7.3.4 Nature of Agriculture Cultivator

7.3.5 Loan Status

The indebtedness in the Direct Impact Zone is not very high. There are a total of 293 households having 390 claimant owners and out of only 15% have taken loans in the area. The amount for the loans taken range from 10 thousands rupees up till five lakhs and above. Majority of these loans have been taken from formal source i.e. government bank and few from cooperative banks. However majority of the land owner did not disclose their loan status or loan amount taken.

7.3.6 Source of Loan

7.3.7 Formal Source of Employment of Women

Formal source of income of Women

Yes No

100%

7.3.8 Informal Source of Employment of Women

Informal source of income of Women

Yes No

100%

7.3.9 Concerns shared by PAFs

VULNERABILITY CONCERNS

94%

87% 87% 85% 84% 85% 82%

7.3.10 Preferred Rehabilitation Resettlement Measures

Preferred rehabilitation/resettlement measures Employment and free education

Government job

5% Emplyment and 3.5 times more 15% 28% than circle rate Employment with basic 19% amenities 12% Compensation, Land, 21% Employment and basic amenities Not willing to leave land

Source: Primary Survey

7.4. Social Infrastructure in the Direct Impact Zone

The table below details the social infrastructure or common properties within the direct impact zone. As per survey it is found that there is no common properties except two wells, and the entire land is being used for agriculture activities growing crop or marginally for keeping live stocks or for animal husbandry mainly.

Table 7.4: Common properties resources in the DIZ

CPRs/ Social Infrastructure Village : Bodaki – Chitehara – Katehara - Palla Schools 01 (1000 Square Meter) Wells 01 Temples / Mosques 0 Shamshaan/Kabristaan 0 Police Chowki 0 Public Health Centre 0 Johad 0 Dharamshala 0 Playground 0 Gramsabha / Panchayat 0 Ghar

Source: Primary Survey

7.5 Information Regarding Land and Livelihood

The DIZ is primarily agricultural in nature and is a very fertile land. The following graphs detail the land demarcation for better inference.

7.5.1 Demarcation of DIZ

As shared by PAFs, 64% of total DIZ is used for agricultural use and 36% of the land is utilized for non-agricultural use such as livestock cottages, some residential structures, other temporary structures etc.

Figure 7.5.1: Demarcation of the total area of land owned by PAFs:

Demarcation of DIZ

36% Net agricultural use Non-agricultural use 64%

7.5.2 Demarcation of the agricultural land

The agricultural land is well irrigated and a major part of the area is very fertile. There are many trees also in DIZ. PAFs use various water resources such as Boring, Nahar/Boring, Tube well, Engine Boring, Govt. Tube well, Summer cell (Submersible water pump) etc. as shared by them.

Figure 7.5.2: Demarcation of agricultural land

Demarcation of agricultural land

3% 9% 1% Irrigated land 13% Non-irrigated land Very fertile land Non-fertile land 74% Land with tree plantation

7.5.3 Current usage of DIZ

The PAFS use the land in different forms such as for agricultural purpose, tree plantation, livestock cultivation for personal and commercial use and also for their own domestic needs.

Figure 7.5.3: Usage of land Usage of DIZ

8% Agriculture Plantation 28% Commercial Industry/MSME 59% Domestic 2% 0% Other 3%

7.5.4 Cottages in DIZ for livestock

Many households have livestock in the DIZ area. They use them for the agricultural, commercial as well as domestic purpose and the livestock have their cottages in the DIZ area itself.

Figure 7.5.4: Cottage for Livestock

Cottage for Livestock

39% Yes No 61%

The land primarily being agricultural in nature, the cattle population is one of the primary assets and that is why possession of cattle becomes a very important component for the PAPs. The majority of the households own buffaloes (61%) followed by cows (39%) which are used for milking and dairy purpose. Amongst the project affected people, the following are the details of households owning different types of cattle in DIZ comprising of all the villages:

Figure 7.5.5: Detail of livestock owned by PAFs

Types of Livestock

10% 30% Cow Buffalo Others

60%

7.5.6 Status of Migration from DIZ

Although most of the PAFs reside in the four villages itself, only a small proportion of the population has migrated for the higher education, employment, matrimonial alliances etc.

Figure 7.5.6(a): Status of migration

Status of migration

Yes No

97%

Figure 7.5.6(b): Reason of migration

Reason of migration

Education 45% Employment

49% Other

7.5.7 House owned by PAFs

Majority of the families are in the APL category and have their own houses around DIZ. Only 5% of them do not have their own houses as depicted below:

Figure 7.5.7: House owned by PAFs

House owned

Yes No

95%

7.5.8 Private vehicles owned

The people of DIZ essentially use two-wheelers (70%) for regular commuting. Around 22% of them use their own cars or four wheelers for mobility. Some of the families have tractors as well used for agricultural activities.

Figure 7.5.8: Private vehicles owned

Types of private vehicles owned

3% 5%

Two wheeler 22% Four wheeler Tractor Others 70%

The PAFs have their own agricultural equipments such as Tractor, Thresher Machine, Engine machine, Cultivator, Trolly, Wheat cutting machine, Lister Engine, Diesel Engine etc.

7.6 Information about Trees on Land The DIZ consists of verity of trees majorly Neem, Shesham, Sagwan, Aam and Safeda. Following is the details about type of tree and approximate numbers as per survey.

TREES DETAILS

0.2176

0.156

0.1459

0.1203

0.0992

0.0722

0.0577

0.0473

0.0267

0.0182

0.0137

0.0088

0.0074

0.0069

0.0019 0.0002

Source: Primary survey

7.7 Information about Crops

7.8 Availability/Access to Natural or Common Resources

Following is the details about the villagers of DIZ regarding use or access to natural or common resources, public owned property like canals, ponds, tube wells, public transport facility, road connectivity to their house, structure about nearest market, participation in dairy cooperatives/ agricultural cooperatives, status about membership as SHG or any other, source of energy for cooking, lighting, drinking water, sanitation facility, bathrooms.

The area is well served with adequate amounts of water. The major sources of water are hand-pumps, tube-wells, and wells. The public health engineering department also supplies water to these villages but only few of the households are availing this facility. Water is also sourced from the canal and boring for irrigation purposes. However, a large number of PAFs have Hand-pumps as water resource. PAPs usually dispose waste that is generated in the house by dumping it onto farmlands. They also use community waste dumping sites that they term as ‘johad’, or outside of their village boundaries however proper waste collection and waste disposal system is lacking in the area.

7.8.1 Access to common or public owned property

7.8.2 Usage of Public Transport

7.8.3 Road connectivity

7.8.4 Visit to nearest market

7.8.5 Participation in dairy/agricultural cooperatives

7.8.6 Membership status

A large number of population is using LPG cylinder about 92.21 percent and merely 6.49% of the PAPs using firewood for cooking. Many of them use a combination of LPG cylinders and firewood for cooking as well. A very nominal number of the

households use kerosene fueled burners or other mediums. This suggests that almost all PAFs have easy access to cylinders or gas connection. 7.8.7 Sources of energy for cooking

Majority of the project affected households have access to electricity (91.3%). A very few of the households use kerosene fueled lamps (about 6.60%) and the presence of solar fuel is almost negligible. People do use pumps for irrigation in their fields and these are mostly fuel based. 7.8.8 Resources of lighting

7.8.9 Sources of Drinking Water

Most of PAPs have indoor flush/pucca toilets (93.72%) within their homes. Some of the people (about 5.5%) still persist with open defecation, and have kutcha or mud pits for the same, but they are very low in numbers.

7.8.10 Sanitation Facility

7.8.11 Bathroom facility

7.9 Common Resources and Public Amenities

The four villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” in Dadri Tehsil, consisting of 293 land plots or gatasankhya have community centers, religious temples, schools, health facility centers, Anganwadi, PDS as common resources and public amenities. There are primary, secondary as well as senior secondary school. However, the villages are not facilitated with proper water supply. The sewerage system is average and electricity availability is quite good. The road connectivity is very good however it does not connect to all the houses. The crime rate is comparatively very low.

7.10: Impact analysis of Acquisition of Land, Livelihood and Income

7.10.1 Increase in employment productivity

7.10.2: Increase in business opportunity

7.10.3: Increase in land price

7.10.4 Increase in public facility

7.10.5: Increase in formal employment productivity

7.10.6: Increase in standard of living

7.10.7: Increase in income

7.10.8: Increase in food security

7.10.9: Increase in women employment productivity

7.10.10: Impact in local economy

7.10.11: Increase in economic dependency

7.10.12: Increase in access of productive resources to people

7.10.13: Effect on wildlife

7.10.14: Status of wild plants and wild animals

7.10.15 : Specification of wild plants and wild animals

1 Wild Plant Unpamarg, Chirchita, Aankhen, Khajur, Jhund, Neem, Seesam, Keekar, Peepal, Aam, Deshi Medicine, Congresi Grass, Plant, Papri Bhang, Bakand, Jamun, Kattha, Guava, Popular

2. Wild Animal Neelcow, Siyar , Rabbit, Rose, Deer, Wild Pig, Fox, Bull, Lion, Monkey, Tiger, Dog, Snake, Swamp, Deer, Cow, Other Animals

7.11 : Impact Analysis of Physical Resources

7.11.1: Impact on soil

7.11.2: Impact on air quality

7.11.3 Impact on water source, water reserve and underground water table

7.11.4 Impact on forest reserve

7.11.5 Impact on noise pollution

7.11.6 Awareness of land acquisition

7.12 The Collective Inferences:

The total land required for the project is 87.8624 Hectares carved out of the four villages “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” Dadri Tehsil, consisting of 293 land plots or gatasankhya mainly private agricultural land plots with some 10-15% of PAFs as residential structure which is to be subsumed under the Direct Impact Zone. This affected area is a small village primarily engaged in agricultural activities along with animal husbandry with 10-15% human inhabitants. The socio-economic and demographics of the village can be summarized as follows with the help of primary data collection from the area:

I. The total area of land to be acquired for the project is 87.8624 Hectares. Almost the entire land is currently used for the purposes of agriculture. The change in land use, from agricultural to transport, specifically for the purposes of establishing Delhi-Mumbai corridor has been granted by the government of Uttar Pradesh. II. The agricultural lands are irrigated lands in the four demarcated villages ‘Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla’ located in Tehsil Dadri. The landholding pattern indicates that majority of the landholders are small and marginal farmers. This also resonates with the district level data. III. The land though is use for agricultural purpose primarily however there are few residential structures and livestock cottages in the land. The PAFs use these livestock for milking and dairy purpose which is a major source of income for them. IV. The gender distribution of PAPs is not deviated on one side. However the landowners are primarily male members of the family. The females though almost equal in number is not the earning member of the family and they are primarily engaged in household activities. All the PAFs are Hindu by religion. There is a significant presence of other backward classes with a small presence of scheduled castes and negligible presence of scheduled tribes in the project impact area.

V. A large percentage of the population falls substantially in the range of upto 35 years indicating that the project affected households have a significant number of young, employable as well as dependent population. VI. The youth (19-35 years) of the project affected area of the four villages consist of a substantial population which is 32.54%. During SIMP, it is important to engage this youth in various jobs according to their educational profile and skill levels. They can be employed as per their competency and qualification. VII. The overall level of literacy of the area is high with 72% being literate. A substantial population is well educated at primary and secondary level with a good number of graduates and few postgraduates. Women record lower levels of literacy as compared to the men. VIII. The income level of the affected population is low with major proportion (36.45%) belonging to up to Rs 4000/- per month, given the small size of land holdings. And also 16.5% of them have no stable income. The occupational data also shows that a large number of the people are dependent on their lands for their livelihood- farming and allied work, there are only a few who have listed their occupations and source of income from private services and government services. IX. Women’s occupation and income levels remain behind in the data collected. This could be due to the fact that women work on their own farms, and rarely go out to earn. Women’s occupation has mostly been recorded as housewives, as their labor within the house and on their fields is not reflected as paid work. X. Nearly two-third of the population lies in the category of APL whereas some of them (25.91%) are also availing ‘Antyodaya Scheme’. There are a few households which are headed by single or widowed women, which were also mentioned in the course of community consultations. XI. For the water supply, the major dependency is on hand pumps. Majority of the population has access to private toilets. Open defecation is not extinct yet, however prevalent in a very small number. Most of the PAPs use LPG and also firewood as medium of cooking. Waste disposal is lacking in the area as there is no prescribed method of collection, sorting or disposal of waste. PAPs usually

dump garbage into dirty drains, or at the ‘pokhars’ which are small rain-fed ponds that form; or they dump it outside the boundaries of their own villages. The people of DIZ essentially use two-wheelers for regular commuting and few of them possess cars and tractors also. Amongst the cattle, the buffalo population is the highest. They also have cows for dairy purpose. The cows and buffalos are their major source of income. XII. For the purpose of SIMP, it is significant to note that a 27% of PAPs are engaged at the Elementary Occupation level (i.e. Skill I level) and almost 51% of them are engaged at 6th category level-Skilled Agricultural and Animal Husbandry (i.e. Skill II level) and around 22% of them are engaged at 4th & 5th Category level – Clerks and as Service Workers and Shop & Market Sales Workers (i.e. Skill II level) as defined by NCO-2015 report. It is thereby important to constructively engage them in the prospective employment as per their skills and education. XIII. The women in DIZ are highly vulnerable, owing to their illiteracy and status of non-working population. For SIMP, their hidden skills need to be identified and required training may be imparted for their social upliftment.

8. Public Consultations - FGD 8.1. Need for Focus Group - Public Consultations In infrastructure and development projects that entail any relocation of population, livestock and livelihood requires robust and socio-economically sound responses from policy framing bodies. In this context, the Public consultation is an imperative part of any development project and refers to the two-way transfer of information or joint discussion between project proponent and the community. Such consultations are required to make the project inclusive and responsive towards local population and social ecology. It brings together all stakeholders, policy framing body and various agencies to discuss and address key concerns and arrive at mutually satisfying outcome. It is an approach of involving various stakeholders, particularly local communities by providing them with a platform to express their views, concerns and apprehensions on issues and/or activities, etc. that might affect them positively

or adversely and thereby enable them to influence the decision making processes. Besides helping to identifying certain intangible impacts and plan effectively, it also helps to communicate information, allay their fears and also helps build rapport with the communities, which is very essential to smooth implementation of such projects.

The goal of such stakeholder participation is primarily to promote public understanding and acceptance of a developmental activity or a project by minimizing potential perceived environmental impacts through education and open discussion. In return, public feedback can be used as constructive input into improving the project design.

8.2 Focus Group - Research Design and Data Collection

Qualitative research followed exploratory research design. The SIA team has conducted focus group discussions and in depth interviews with the villagers of “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” for qualitative study. This in turn helped to extract explicitly many relevant issues related to their land acquisition, livelihood, employment, social structure, living standard there upon etc.

Focus Group discussions, a kind of in- depth interview conducted in a group (a form of group interview) are helpful in generating ideas for further investigations in the study. Data collection for qualitative study was done through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Focus Group application was particularly helpful in furnishing information about how people think, feel, or act regarding a specific topic. The moderator had a semi- structured, open ended set of questions and detailed discussion with senior residents/farmer/head along with group participants where these participants shared their opinion and ideas about the proposed land acquisition for DMIC (Multi-Model Logistic Hub & Integrated Transport Hub and Approach Track). They also shared their viewpoint and comments on each other’s answers. Focus was on interaction inside the group. Five focus group discussions were conducted in these villages with villagers. The focus group consisted of 8-10 participants.

To analyze the results of interviews and focus group, a mixture of techniques were used like ethnography, content analysis, relational analysis. Ethnographic summary means direct citations of group discussion. In content analysis, keywords and themes were outlined and concepts were found, relational analysis where ideas were examined, relationships between the concepts were explored and analyzed in order to find commonalities and differences. These all approaches of qualitative data analysis are complementary to each other.

It is interesting to note that, in the duration of conducting the survey as well as the focused group discussions, all the PAFs agreed to the proposed DMIC project. Majority of the people see it as a source of development, jobs, area development, source of increase in land value in the surrounding areas, and a means of bringing about urbanization. The survey teams and the members conducting the FGDs did not face any difficulty during the collection of information or during the consultations. The major concerns of the PAFs converge around a sense of loss their land, livelihood and social ecology coupled with apprehension over the compensation packages and the timely payment of such. Awareness regarding the project was widespread and respondents even asked about when the DMIC would become operational. It would be fair to say that the PAPs are not against the project, rather they are looking forward to the development that will take place after the project in the surrounding areas. The team found an overwhelming sense of curiosity to see this project to be fully operational at the earliest possible.

8.3 Focus Group Study of “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” The objective of Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) was to gather as much information as possible about the lives of the Project Affected Families (PAF) about the areas they live in, and their land-use arrangements, etc. FGDs with project- affected people were carried out to get the community feedback to understand the existing socio-economic conditions of the community, particularly of the vulnerable group of the “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” villages in Dadri

Block, Gautam Budha Nagar. It was carried out Gata wise respondents on during 23 - 31 October 2020.

The issues raised especially about nature of source of income, whether it is agriculture or Non agriculture and proportion of non-agriculture, role of Women in Family, use of their private assets for the domestic use or Commercial purpose, level of poverty and BPL/APL card.

The participants were asked about the source of income of the PAF, they have responded that agriculture and animal husbandry are the only source of income. In agriculture, they are mainly growing crops such as; Wheat, rice/Paddy, Tilhan, Millet, Barley, Pea and some other cash crops and involved in working in their own fields and/or renting some fields to other villagers. In totality, they are using their land entirely for the personal/domestic use and majority of them have APL card. Some PAFs are also engaged in the low scale business activities like dairy, small scale industry, small shops at the village level. Around 70 percent of PAF belongs to an unskilled category and around 30 percent skilled, out of these skilled categories, they are possessing B.Tech, ITI, B, Pharma, B.Ed, B.T.C, BBA, and Computer Diploma holders. Under the skilled category around 10 percentare engaged in the government sector and 20 percent in the private sector. The majority of women in these villages are solely home maker i.e. working as a housewife and helping in agriculture activity of their family, very few are engaged in government and private sector jobs. In the government sector jobs includes Aanganbadi, ASHA worker and school teachers.

FGD was focused on impact/effect of Land Acquisition in their PAPs Employability, on earning capability, social position, Cultural ethos, Family structure, mental wellness and ecological wellness.

Majority of them have negative perception about employability and fear about losing jobs/engagement i.e. will get unemployed by losing lands.

The acquisition of living space and farming land will have hard effects on their livelihood. Most of them have opined that after losing land will get dependent on the market for the things they are getting from the fields free of costs like Milk, Vegetables, and Grains etc. Acquisition of land will badly affect us and will change lives drastically. With the expansion of the business sector, social status will be adversely affected. ‘Our identity and that of the village will be destroyed which will ruin our social life’ was the general perception.

‘Land acquisition will weaken the economic situation, which will adversely affect our social life and role of Panchayati Raj culture will be weaken, which has so far have importance in our lives’.

‘Giving land to the government means the dispersal of families as there will be no reason for the generations to stay back. After the land acquisition the coming generations will migrate to other cities in search of employment. Acquisition will be the main reason for the breakdown of the family’.

Inconsequence, mental stress will increases, future worries will begin to persecute and in fights under families will increases with compensation in monetary terms. The future generations will get more money and their chances of deterioration in family values increases. Ecology will be adversely affected, pollution will increase.

Their opinions/perceptions were discussed and sought regarding an increase in employment productivity, business opportunity, land price, public facility, formal employment productivity, standard of living in the affected area.

‘If the government ensures to give us employment in the proposed scheme, then our employment will increase but if government fails to give us employment then we will lose employment completely in this area’.

The proposed scheme will increase the industrial opportunities in the area, but the rural people will be benefitted only if the government ensures at least 40% of our participation in the scheme, otherwise the increase in industrial opportunities will not be beneficial for the rural people i.e. PAPs.

This project will increase the income of the government and industrial houses but it will not have any effect on the income of the rural people living in the surrounding areas and there is more possibility of having its negative impact.

All of them were echoed that land prices will increases with the commencement of the proposed scheme under project and there be an increase in public facilities, but many of them shared on their past experience of earlier land acquisition, that the industrial houses will exploit direct benefit from the project. As the common perception prevails strongly that wherever the land had been acquired in the past, the situation remains became adverse related to lively hood and employability and its impact persist for even today.

Their opinion/perceptions were discussed and sought regarding an increase in food security in the affected area, women employment productivity, standard of living,

The acquisition of agricultural land will completely eliminate the food security of the region. Most of the women here are engaged in agricultural work, so the employment productivity of women will be adversely affected by the formation of the proposed project, and since they lack vocational training and skills their future prospect also may get suffered. Since, agriculture and animal husbandry is the main source of income in these villages, the acquisition of agricultural land for the proposed project will negatively affect their standard of living.

FGD was held and concerned about acquisition effect on the local economy of the area, economic dependency,

Land acquisition will likely to destroy the basic structure of local economy although new kind of opportunity may arises but as the villagers are not well qualified and skilled and heavily dependent on agriculture and animal husbandry, switch over to other form of earning will become difficult and in turn land acquisition will increase their economic dependence for lively hood.

The status of wild plant and wild animal in the affected area, project impact on the soil of the surrounding area, air quality of the surrounding area

Wildlife animals such as deer, reindeer, rabbit, peacock, and monkeys are found. Some medicinal tree, and plants such as Neem, Katha, Arjun's Bark, Date and Palm are found in abundance in this area.

The proposed project will adversely affect the soil of the surrounding area. This project will increase the amount of pollution in the soil, the fertility of the soil will be lost, and carbon emissions are likely to have a negative impact on the soil. The proposed project will increase air pollution in the region. Companies use other polluted fuel in place of electricity to reduce their fuel costs such as diesel and kerosene, causing more pollution.

DMIC’s Project impact on the issues like the water source, water reserve and underground water level of the surrounding area and the forest reserve in the project area also raised and discussed in FGD.

Canals, ponds, tube wells, and hand pump etc. are found in abundance in this area as a source of water, but the formation of the proposed project will have a negative impact on the water sources of this area. The amount of pollution in the water will increase, groundwater levels also will go down, natural water sources will be destroyed, and these will have a very adverse effect on water sources of this area.

With the arrival of this project, the wet land area of our village will be completely destroyed, the birds will start dying here and the birds coming from abroad will stop here, which will be a great loss for this village ecosystem. The impact of this project in the noise pollution in the surrounding area, health facility/hospital in the affected area was also raised.

The project is proposed as Delhi Mumbai Logistic Hub which will include the loading and unloading work in this area. This will also increase the traffic in the area as more number of heavy vehicles will come and go from here. With the increase in traffic the noise pollution of the region will automatically increase.

Most of them were of the opinion that the project has nothing to do with the growth of health facilities and hospitals.

The impact of this project on an increase in educational facility/schools/colleges and in transportation and road facility in the area?

‘No, this project has nothing to do with the increase in the number of schools and colleges’. In case for some reasons even if there will be an increase in the number of schools and colleges in this area, then the local people will not get the benefit of these because the fees of these institutions will be very high which cannot be afforded by the locals.

The proposed project is a corridor between Delhi to Mumbai that has no connection with local traffic or road facilities.

The impact of this project on an increase in housing capacity and electricity availability / facility, supply of local services/house help in the area? After the land acquisition for the proposed project, there will be a reduction in housing capacity as land will not be available for housing. Also, the facilities that will be made

available due to the proposed project will be outside the purchasing power of the local people, which will not benefit the local people.

Yes, there is a possibility of increase in the supply of domestic helpers and local services with the coming of this project but the local people will not get the benefit of this services.

Yes, the proposed project will increase the power supply capacity of the area, but it will not increase for the rural areas. It will be limited only to the industrial sector as well as the rate of electricity bill will also increase in this area, which will increase an economic burden on the local people.

On the issue of an improvement in the availability of resources to people and an increase in value of private asset in the area;

Most of them were convinced that, due to the proposed scheme, the availability of resources in this area will increase, but the local people will not have sufficient funds to use those resources. However, the value of private asset in this area will increase due to the proposed project.

In general, any other opinion/observation about project were also discussed and raised in FGD.

The facilities of those who are not involved in the project should also be taken care of. After the land acquisition for the project, the remaining land should be distributed equally among all the villagers so that all people can have a relationship with the village as well as to reduce the economic inequality arising out of the project. It is very important to maintain transparency in the process related to the project by the concerned authorities, which is far below the expected level. So we all hope that the concerned authorities maintain transparency in the process related to the project.

For the entire land to be acquired for the project, land should be acquired in the same manner. Section 46 of the Act has been misused by the concerned authority to acquire the land for the proposed project. So the concerned authority should follow section 46 properly and all the people's lands should be acquired in the same manner. At present, Gram Panchayat is working in the area affected by the project, so this entire area should be declared as rural area and the rates of compensation should be fixed according to the rural area.

The land should be leased instead of acquiring the land for the proposed project. The participation of at least 40% of all affected families in the proposed project should be ensured. Provision of appropriate facilities as per the Act should also be made available for the landless, dependent, poor people of the project affected area. Necessary measures should be adopted to preserve the available natural water resources, wildlife and wetland areas in the area affected by the project. Thank you so much to all of you for your active participation and cooperation with us.

Overall Likely impact on the Community wellbeing and Livability - The participants were concerned about the likely impacts on community wellbeing and liva bility, they responded that there will be much impact on people’s life. It is also responded that around 90 percent of the agricultural land has been acquired by the government which was the main source of their livelihood. It is also responded that around 80 percent of PAF will be more affected by this land acquisition. The project will upset the social and cultural life of the people because their lifestyle could be completely changed after the project. They are very skeptical to lose their native traditional village culture and joint family structure. They have responded that their livelihood is mainly based on agriculture, which provides the equal distribution of the income among the family members but after the loss of land, we would be forced to do some kind of business for their survival which would affect the joint family structure.

When the participants were asked about the likely impact on the environment, they said that any kind of construction will change the topography of the area and the environmental effect will be there because the trees will be cut and the land will be dug. Problems will be there during the construction phase if they leave the soil in the open without covering or proper disposal.

The expectation from the said project When the participants were asked about their aspirations and fears on the proposed project or if they would like to share anything with relation to this proposed project, the participants welcome this development in their village and they believe that the government is working for the betterment and security of the people. They all agreed that it would generate more employment for men and women and increase more opportunities in the area. The project will also improve the quality of life in the sense of availability of electricity and basic amenities.

If the landowners give away the land to the government for the construction of the project then the Government should employ at least one member from the land owner’s family after the completion of the project or the government could also provide alternative land to the PAFs. They are also expecting good compensation against land acquisition.

Picture: Showing the Focus Group Discussion held in Bodaki Village on 27th October 2020.

Picture: Focus Group Discussion held in Chitehra Village on 28th October 2020.

9. Public Consultations - Public Hearing

9.1. Need for Public Consultations - Public Hearing

Sr. No. Date Village concerned Venue of the public Hearing Time

1. Chamrawali Bodaki

2. Chithara

3. Katehara

4. Palla

To beproposed

9.2. Details of the Public Consultations

9.3 Key Concerns and Recommendations

9.4. Pictures from the Project Site

9.5. Pictures from the Public Hearings

100

10. Social Impact Analysis of DMIC

10.1. Potential Positive Impacts The development of the proposed Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor will not only bring about economic benefits but also help in the social elevation of the people in the direct as well as indirect influence zone. It is estimated that the project will foster growth in the area with the following perceived benefits:  Enhance the socio-economic conditions of the local residential settlements- directly due to compensation from the purchase of land and also indirectly from the ancillary services like transport, hotel, the rise of associated small businesses, etc. as an outcome of the project.  Provide the opportunities for economic development not only in the Dadri area in Gautam Budha Nagar but also in the adjoining area with the employment opportunities with the increased demand of skilled, educated as well as unskilled people which will eventually improve the standard of living.  The industry sector will get a boost in Uttar Pradesh especially in the adjoining area of NCR.  The area will witness commercial development in the form of the market zones and will support the socio-economic elevation of the resident.  The women will witness more opportunities to educate and train themselves and make themselves worthy of the employment generated and become independent.

Overall, the project will result in the increased mobility, enhanced employment, improved education, the rise of small-scale entrepreneurs, better living, and above all will connect the area with major markets and trade centers within and outside the district and will result in sustained economic growth.

10.2 Positive Impacts Perceived by PAFs The primary survey was conducted to understand the impacts of the project as perceived by PAFs. The residents seemed to be hopeful about their socio-economic

101

development with the construction of the DMIC. The PAPs had the realization that the proposed project will bring about employment opportunities and increase the business and trade in the area and also will increase the value of land around the proposed site. They could also envisage that the ancillary services around the area will facilitate them with better roads, schools, transport, and medical facilities. The following figure details the positive impacts of the proposed project as perceived by PAFs.

Different positive impacts perceived by PAFs

Increase in employment

Increase in business opportunity 10% 6% 30% Increase in land price 4% Increase in public facility 9% Increase in standard of living

8% Increase in food security 18% 15% Increase in local economy of the area Increase in access to productive resources

Fig 10.2 Different positive impacts perceived by PAPs (Source: primary survey)

10.3 Impact on Poverty Reduction The establishment of the proposed project is believed to support poverty alleviation by providing employment opportunities to both skilled and non-skilled people. The enhanced connectivity of roads, improved public transportation, restaurants, health and other basic amenities in the area of the vicinity will provide the alternative means of livelihood to the residents.

The rise of business and trade will also increase the demand for various goods and services in the area of housing, education, health, and transport which in turn will have multifold positive effects on income and employment. Thus, the development of the project is expected to reduce the poverty level of the area by offering

102

employment not only during the construction phase but also thereafter through the associated ancillary services.

10.4 Key Adverse Impacts The socio-economy primary survey revealed that there are some negative impacts due to the construction of the proposed project site. The estimated adverse effects could be on the land, community, property sources, soil, agriculture, and livelihood, etc.

10.4.1 Impact on Land The total area of the land of the affected DMIC project 87.8624 hectares. The land of villages used for the project is very fertile and used solely for agricultural purposes. The loss of the land can be a cause of displeasure to the landowners as land is the most viable fixed asset of the villagers and continued source of living. As also observed during survey data collection and public hearing, the PAPs have shown their concern about their compensation. These concerns should be taken care of by having an organized system of administering the compensation and R&R scheme.

10.4.2 Impact on Common Structures The acquired land four villages do not have any common structures like samadhi sthals, temple, Gram Sabha, or Panchayat Ghar. The acquired land is entirely agricultural and used for farming specially Bajra, Wheat, and Rice/Paddy. And as such, there is no permanent structure except for a few tube-wells, boring connections, and hand pumps.

10.4.3 Impact on Fixed Assets and Occupational Structure The site of the DMIC project does not have any permanent structure in terms of housing as the entire land is primarily agricultural however since the land is a direct source of income for the villagers, the land acquisition will adversely impact those households who are solely dependent on the area for their livelihood, more than households who have other sources of income as well in terms of jobs and businesses. Apart from the land, there are few other fixed assets such as wells, tube-

103

wells, and hand-pumps which will also be displaced due to land acquisition. The restoration plan should thereby include the assurance of the continued usage of these assets. Also, there needs to be an income restoration plan for affected PAPs. The resettlement program should include activities like training, employment from jobs at the project, directed credit, small businesses, and enterprise development for job creation. However, there is also a section of the households that are not directly dependent on this agricultural land and work in the private and government sector or have small businesses. It can thereby be inferred that PAPS do have some exposure to other avenues of generating livelihood and by orienting and training them to such other ventures, the impact on the occupational structure and livelihood dependency can be reduced considerably. The direct interaction with them also points out that PAPs are looking forward to the jobs in the service sector which they believe that, will bring stability in their lives.

10.4.4 Impact on Livestock and Crops All four villagers of the project have much livestock for the support in farming and animal husbandry like buffaloes, cows, goats, horses, etc. The resettlement of these livestock should also be ensured so that they continue to be the source of their income. Moreover, the acquired land being primarily agricultural has substantial growth of many crops such as wheat, bajra, jowar, and paddy/rice, etc. which is an indirect source of income for villagers in the form of edibles and thereby the resettle plan and compensation package should also consider this indirect source of dependency of villagers.

10.4.5 Impact on the People in the Adjacent Area The development of this project will not only impact the PAFs but also have an indirect or direct impact on the population of the adjoining area considered as the project influence area. The development of the DMIC project could harm groundwater, surface water, air, and noise in the adjacent areas. The over depletion of groundwater can cause water issues. The increased vehicle movements will lead to a significant adverse impact on the local air quality as well as noise pollution. The

104

construction phase itself can result in noise and air pollution and bring about disturbance to settlements around. The train route will contribute to an increase in ambient noise quality in and around.

10.5 Concerns Perceived by the PAPs The socio-economic survey also recorded the concerns of PAPs with the proposed project. The major one remained the loss of land itself. Other concerns included conflict with the outsiders, the influx of migrants impacting their employment opportunities. They want a properly laid compensation plan against the loss of their lands. Overall, the PAPs believe to experience more positive impacts with the development of the DMIC project however they shared these concerns primarily as apprehensions about the compensation plan rather than a voice against the construction of the proposed project.

Concerns perceived by PAFs

Loss of land 12% Compensation plan 8% 38% Livelihood insecurities 7% Conflict with outsiders on employment opportunities

18% Affect on family structure

17% Affect on mental wellness

Figure 10.5: Concerns perceived by PAPs

105

11. Social Impact Management Plan 11.1 Approach to Mitigation Measures The compensation for the PAPs is proposed to be laid out based on RFCTLAR (UP) Rules, 2016, and also at par with the compensation of the acquired land of the four villages. Due care needs to be taken to compensate each affected family according to associated losses- land, structure, movable/immovable assets, etc. The act ensures that proper compensation is given to PAPs and all their related concerns are taken care of. We have tried to map the concerns raised by PAPs during public consultation with the provision in the Act. The proposed measures thereby identified for the welfare of the project affected people in the RFCTLAR (UP) Rules, 2016 are:

 Social Impact Assessment before the land acquisition process  More monetary benefit and listing of the landholding, movable/immovable assets in the affected area.  Right to dissent  Mandatory R&R Package beyond Acquisition including livelihood plan, gender plan, etc.  Timeline for payments before R&R  Due diligence to social impacts  Transparency and participatory approach  Curbing misuse of land  The option of the lease  Institutional mechanism- National/ state monitoring authorities for disposal of disputes/ commissioner R&R/ administrator

A primary survey was conducted exclusively for the PAPs to have firsthand opinions and concerns of PAPs and map them to have a more effective Social management plan.

Apart from ensuring the implementation of RFCTLAR (UP) Rules, 2016 for the compensation plan, there should be some institutional mechanism for the timely and 106

justifiable implementation of the same. The project implementing agency is thereby suggested to undertake the following:

 Grievance redressal mechanism needs to be developed and a committee should be instituted headed by a senior officer for the timely settlement of the grievances related to land acquisition and R&R settlement. It should exist from the start to the end of the project.  Evaluation of R&R should be done by some external agency and the result should be used for any further action is required.

Besides complying with the required provisions of the act, the project executing agency should try to accommodate maximum or all the project affected people for the jobs created at and around the DMIC project. The agency should also try to make an effort to provide relevant jobs based on individual skills and education.

11.2 Impact and Management Plan This section talks about various impacts which the proposed project is perceived to have on the life of PAPs and also discusses the respective management plan to curb those impacts as follows:

 The first and foremost important impact on PAPs is the permanent acquisition of their land. The management plan for this impact is to provide rich compensation to them as per on RFCTLAR (UP) Rules, 2016, and also at par with the compensation of the acquired four villages of the Dadri Tehsil.

 There is a significant number of people who are dependent on the land to support their livelihood and with the land being acquired, they will lose the livelihood opportunity. Since the entire land of four villages is agricultural, there will be an absolute loss of farm produce on the land used up for farming. On one hectare of land, the average approximate production of

107

wheat is 3217 kg/hectare and the approximate farm income (Profit) is INR 10/kg (as per public consultation with PAPs). To compensate for this continued source of income from their land, the impact management plan should prioritize the Project affected people for the job. The project executing agency should employ PAPs as per the skills, education, willingness, and suitability for the job. Project executing agencies should also help in the skill development of PAPs and make them suitable for the jobs taken.

11.3 Gender Plan The socio-economic profile of PAPs reveals that there is a significant gender gap in literacy, women’s workforce participation and recognition, and their access to ownership of assets. Low awareness level coupled with insignificant roles in financial decision making at household and community level further restrict the women from accessing the benefits created by the project equitably. The compensation amount in maximum possibility will be controlled by men whom they might misuse due to low literacy levels and existing bad habits like drinking alcohol rather than saving or investing for long-term benefits. In that scenario, women may have to face the additional burden of running a household on limited income and resources. It is therefore important to assess the status of the project affected women and accordingly devise the management plan.

11.3.1 Management Plan for Women As observed during the survey, women in the village are not well educated and are home-makers. The potential impact on women because of the proposed project could be the loss of long-term security associated with the fixed assets in the form of land. The management plan should focus on empowering the project affected women to equip them with financial sustainability. Employment opportunities need to be provided to them to uplift their present status. However, there needs to be strict vigilance of safety and security where women will be employed through the project.

108

The participation of women in the project needs to be envisaged from the project preparation to the construction phase and also in the operation phase. The following systematic measures can be taken to ensure that women also become the equal beneficiary of the management plan:

 In the project preparation stage, the participation of women was ensured during the survey and consultation.  The executing agency will also take pro-active initiatives so that women are properly consulted and invited to participate in group-based activities to gain access to resources.  Women also need to be engaged during the construction phase and also during the operation phase as per their existing or developed skills.  The participation of women is equally required for monitoring and evaluation activities that will make the process more transparent to them. It is expected that women will be encouraged to evaluate the project outputs and bring forward their valuable suggestions for necessary actions towards further modifications in the project creating a better and congenial situation for increasing their participation.

During the construction activities, a high number of skilled and unskilled labor forces will be required that will be from the close-by area and will comprise of both men and women. The construction camps need to be provided considering the involvement of women both directly and indirectly during the construction phase. These construction camps need to be designed for the welfare of women and children. These construction camps should provide temporary housing at the labour camp site. These camps should also be equipped with the necessary health care facilities, Day Crèche facilities, and education facilities. The schedule of working hours also needs to be planned to exempt women from night shifts.

109

11.4 Training Need Assessment The Social Impact Management Plan has to strategize for the economic sustenance of the PAPs. They need to be trained to help them improve their production level to make them impart new skills or upgrade their existing skills through training. As the PAPs are mostly dependent on agriculture for their primary livelihood, training is thereby a very important component for their income restoration. For PAPs who intend to diversify their economic activity, suitable various training needs have to be identified to engage them in income generation according to their preferences. Besides the training programs aimed to impart skills, general entrepreneurship development also needs to be assessed and such development programs should also be a part of the training program which might aim to improve the managerial capabilities of PAPs. Also, capacity enhancing assistance needs to be provided to improve the access of women towards certain skills such as tailoring and weaving, small good shops, marketing-buying and selling local produce, etc. which can act as a supplementary source of income for women. Vocational training may also be imparted to the project affected women and children. These training programs would be imparted through the existing government schemes specifically meant for the development and welfare of the women community and supplementary funds could be relocated from the project towards facilitating the setting-up of the training-related activities. There are various NGOs and government schemes that can be contacted and utilized for this purpose such as Self Help Groups, Support for women and child development, Women empowerment programs in different villages, etc.

11.5 Livelihood Restoration and Income Generation Strategy via Skill Mapping The project is expected to provide income generation opportunities by way of skill development training and linkage with the ongoing government schemes at the Tehsil level. The executing agency will play a proactive role in mobilizing various government schemes for the benefits of PAPs. The executing agency will work with the PAPs and line department of the Tehsil to deliver the maximum benefits of the training programs.

110

A very important aspect of income restoration activities involves skill mapping of PAPs whose livelihood is directly impacted due to land acquisition. The skill development option linked to the resource base of the area and availability of the market shall be discussed with PAPs to ascertain their preferences in selecting certain skill development training. PAPs will be encouraged to participate in developing feasible long-term income-generating schemes instead of a short-term arrangement. Such schemes will be identified by the executing agency in consultation with PAPs, district administration, and other stakeholders in institutional financing and marketing federations to prepare a feasible sustainable proposal for PAPs.

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority should facilitate the inclusion of PAPs in the government-sponsored poverty alleviation program in the area as per the eligibility criteria of each program. GNIDA may also facilitate training for skills development. There should be a strong emphasis on imparting vocational training to the unskilled youth by collaborating with the institutions providing vocational training and government schemes such as Skill Development Mission.

The project should also try to match the existing skills with the requirement of the work during the construction phase. In the case of non-existent of the required skills but the dire need of PAPs to get work, the project should also facilitate on-the-job training with the consultation of the contractor.

Moreover, during the implementation of the project, skills training, and job opportunities could be offered to PAFs. The PAFs can also be engaged in the allied agriculture activities such as dairy, poultry, cattle rearing, etc. which will also take care of the existing live-stock of PAFs.

The project should also focus on helping the PAFs in providing opportunities for quality education with the help of various organizations such as Satyam Foundations

111

Sarvodaya Educational and Welfare Society etc. that will make them eligible for long- term employment and will contribute to poverty alleviation of PAFs.

The Social Impact Management Plan should thereby ensure a livelihood mapping exercise, to ascertain the type of skill required in the area of PAPs for the jobs that would be created. For the purpose, a comprehensive survey should be conducted to identify the people who want to participate in livelihood and skill development training and thereby categorizing their areas of interest to find the suitable and courses and classes. The agency may also identify suitable training institutes, classes, and organizations in the vicinity of the project affected area as extended support to PAPs.

112

Annexure

12.1Land Owners Details [Scale of Measurement (in Hectare)]

Hectare) Hectare)

Number

S.No. and

No Land of

Totalof No.

Applicant No

Questionnaire

Measerment (in (in Measerment (in Measerment

Total Claimant

Separate Land Separate

Total Area Scale of of Scale Area Total

Used Area Scale of of Area Scale Used

filled questionnaire

Applicant have who

Gata No Applicant Name Remarks (All information have been as mentioned per Khatoni/Provided list) 193 111 111 0.35000 0.35000 A ROOPVATI All members have been filled questionnaire 198 111 1 B 3 3 SANJAY SINGH DEEPAK SINGH 199 111 C BHATI Mr. Devendra Singh is land 247 277 1 277 0.79400 0.26460 A 1 1 DEVENDRA SINGH owner DHARMENDRA Remaining members have not 238 317 1 317 0.02900 0.02900 A 7 1 BHATI fill questionnaire 263 318 1 318 0.12100 0.12100 A 1 1 JAGVIR SINGH Mr. Jagvir Singh is land owner 246 323 1 323 0.08100 0.04050 A 1 1 SATVATI Mrs. Satvati is land owner Khasra no 409 is not mentioned 312 409 1 409 A JAI KISHAN in provided list 284 445 1 445 0.09300 0.09300 A 24 11 SHYAM VEER SINGH

113

SATENDRA SINGH 286 445 B BHATI UPENDRA SINGH 287 445 C BHATI SARMINDRA SINGH 288 445 D BHATI PUSHPENDRA 289 445 E 1. Mr. Shyamveer Singh is not SINGH BHATI mentioned in provided list. HARENDRA SINGH 302 445 F 2. Remaining members have BHATI not fill questionnaire 308 445 G SHYAM SINGH 320 445 H SATYAVEER SINGH 325 445 I KAMLESH 327 445 J VIJAY 360 445 K PREMCHAND 321 446 0.43600 0.43600 A SATISH KUMAR 1. Mr. Deepak and Arun Kumar 342 446 B DEEPAK are not mentioned in provided list. 2. 343 446 C ARUN KUMAR 1 446 5 6 Remaining members have not 357 446 D AJAD fill questionnaire 358 446 E PRAMOD 359 446 F SUBHASH 305 447 0.10900 0.10900 A SUBE SINGH BHATI Mr. Sube Singh Bhati and Mr. 1 447 2 2 330 447 B ATAR SINGH Atar Singh are land owner 303 448 448 0.36500 0.36500 A NIKKI 1. Remaining members have 304 448 B GYANVATI not fill questionnaire 1 7 4 326 448 C KAVINDRA 328 448 D RAM BHAROSE 338 455 1 455 0.29100 0.29100 A 2 2 RISHIPAL

114

Mr. Rishipal and Maniram are 339 455 B MANIRAM land owner. 294 457 457 0.50700 0.50700 A SUNEEL BANSAL Mr. Suneel, Mr. Jagpal, Mr. 341 457 B JAGPAL Joginder and Pushpendra are not mentioned in provided list. 345 457 1 C 3 5 RAJPAL 353 457 D JOGINDER SINGH PUSHPENDRA 354 457 E SINGH 344 462 1 462 0.13900 0.13900 A 1 1 TEJPAL SINGH Mr. Tejpal Singh is land owner Mr. Manveer Singh is land 324 465 1 465 0.29500 0.29500 A 1 1 MANVEER SINGH owner 351 473 1 473 0.28100 0.27860 A 1 1 JAYPAL SINGH Mr. Jaypal is land owner. Remaining members have not 168 474 474 0.67300 0.67300 A BIJENDRA fill questionnaire and Mr. 1 4 2 Bijendra is not mentioned in 191 474 B DEVINDRA provided list Mr. Aasheram is not fill 352 477 1 477 0.61200 0.31560 A 2 1 BASERAM questionnaire 290 490 490 0.25400 0.63700 A SURESH Mr. Jay Singh, Ajeet and Satish 291 490 B SHEELA are only land owner of khasra no 490 but Satish is not fill 292 490 C MAHESH CHAND questionnaire. 295 490 D SUBHASH 296 490 1 E 3 9 JAI SINGH 301 490 F AJEET SINGH 306 490 G RAJKUMAR 310 490 H NARESH 311 490 I MUKESH 317 494 1 494 0.51600 0.50960 A 3 2 RAJKUMAR

115

Mrs. Dariyai is not fill 318 494 B PAWAN KUMAR questionnaire 313 495 495 0.51500 0.34340 A ARUN KUMAR All members are land owner 316 495 B BASANTI 1 4 4 319 495 C VINOD KUMAR 329 495 D DHARMRAJ 165 498 1 498 1.62000 0.40500 A 1 1 HATAM SINGH Mr. Hatam Singh is land owner Mrs. Suresh Devi is not fill 298 501 1 501 0.40000 0.13340 A 2 1 YOGESH KUMAR questionnaire Remaining members have not 232 522 1 522 0.11700 0.11700 A 3 1 AJAB SINGH fill questionnaire 178 537 537 0.43700 0.43700 A RAMPAT Mr. Rampat is not mentioned in 206 537 1 A 2 3 JAYVIR SINGH provided list 208 537 B VIJENDRA SINGH 212 540 1 540 0.29900 0.29900 A 1 2 SANJAY SINGH Mr. Sanjay Singh & Mr. Bhagwati are not mentioned in 174 540 B BHAGWATI provided list. 115 557 1 557 0.16400 0.16400 A 1 ASHOK Land owner is Mr. Ashok Mr. Braham Singh is land 229 596 1 596 1.17500 1.17500 A 1 1 BRAHAM SINGH owner 167 603 603 0.59500 0.59500 A MANJU Remaining Members have not 1 5 2 202 603 B AJAB SINGH filled questionnaire 130 610 A 35 2 MANOJ Mr. Vijay is not mention in 1 610 0.24600 0.24600 138 610 B VIJAY provided list Mr. Kavaljeet is not mention in 40 619 1 619 1.12600 0.61980 A 1 1 KAVALJEET provided list. Remaining Members have not 56 626 1 626 0.15200 0.07410 A 10 1 RAJVIR SINGH filled questionnaire

116

Remaining Members have not 163 746 1 746 0.11400 0.07220 A 18 1 NEERAJ PRADHAN filled questionnaire SATVEER SINGH Mr. Ashok is land owner. 76 889 1 889 1.37900 0.25300 A 1 1 BHATI Mr. Santram is not fill 32 908 1 908 1.04000 0.39000 A 2 1 MUKHIRAM questionnaire. 11 926 0.72400 0.43610 A 3 3 MANIRAM Mr. Devendra is not mention in 38 926 1 926 B DEVENDRA SINGH provided list and Mrs. Mamta in not fill questionnaire. 373 926 C DHANIRAM 49 937 937 0.74600 0.12540 A NARENDRA Mr. Narendra and Dharmendra 1 2 2 50 937 B DHARMENDRA are land owner. 72 999 999 1.95400 1.62860 A RATANLAL Mr. Shyam Singh is not 151 999 B SANDEEP BHATI mention in provided list and 1 16 4 remaining members are not fill 152 999 C SHYAM SINGH questionnaire. 390 999 D BABU RAM 73 1028 1 1028 0.26600 0.08760 A 6 3 SAVITA Mrs. Savita, Mr. Jitendra Kumar and Mr. Devendra are not 74 1028 B JITENDRA KUMAR mention in provided list and list members are not fill 104 1028 C DEVENDRA questionnaire. 762,8 Khasra no 76, 28, 81 are not 375 81,89 890 0.64500 0.19360 A 3 1 RAJESH mentioned is provided list. 0 103M Mr. Sunder is not mention in 210 2 103 1.39300 0.34820 A 1 1 SUNDER , 200 provided list in khasra no 200M and Mr. Surendra has not fill 209 200M 1 200 0.43800 0.21900 A 2 2 JITENDRA SINGH questionnaire of Khasra no 200M.

117

108, Khasra no 108, 181, 1210 are 181, not mentioned is provided list. 133 4 906 1.24000 0.52770 A 17 1 VEER SINGH BHATI 1210, 906 110, 1. Mr. Indrajeet and Mr. 172 2 110 0.43300 0.21650 A 1 2 INDRAJEET 201 Rajendra Singh are not 110M mentioned is provided list in 203 201 1.42100 1.42100 B 2 SAVITRI RANA , 201 khasra no 110, 201, 202. 110, 2. Remaining Members have 171 201, 3 202 0.26000 0.26000 A 1 1 RAJENDRA SINGH not fill questionnaire. 202 204 201 A 1 1 MUKESH 114M 114M 0.63000 0.16200 A 2 1 DHARM SINGH Remaining members have not , 538, 538 0.39600 0.39600 2 fill questionnaire of khasra no 227 576M 4 114, 538 576 0.37100 0.12370 1 , 577M 577 0.39700 0.13230 1 119M 1. Mr. Vijay Pal Singh has not , mentioned in provided list in 452M khasra no 552. , 2. Remaining members have 216 495M 5 119 0.63000 0.15750 A 1 1 VIJAY PAL SINGH not fill questionnaire. , 552M , 557M 452M 217 , 452 0.52000 0.10400 A 5 4 DHANNO DEVI 495M 2 452M 218 , 495 1.07600 0.39470 B 6 SATENDRA BHATI 495M

118

452M 219 , 552 1.76700 0.36420 C 3 SATPAL 495M 452M 220 , 557 1.11000 0.16850 D 1 TITU SINGH 495M 207 552 1 A 1 KASHMIRI 200 128M 1 128 0.14100 0.14100 A 2 2 SATENDRA Mr. Satendra and Mr. Upendra 201 128M B UPENDRA are land owner. 16M, Mr. Dharmvir has not fill 166 35M, 3 16M 0.77700 0.38850 A 2 1 RAMU questionnaire of khasra no 80M 16M. 35M 0.67600 0.25350 1 196 80M 1 80M 1.02700 0.51360 A 2 1 DHARMVIR 244 265M 1 265M 1.01500 1.01320 A 1 1 RAMPAL Mr. Rajpal is land owner 243 267M 1 267M 0.69900 0.13980 A 1 1 JAGAT SINGH Mr. Jagat Singh is land owner 234 268M 0.67300 0.33650 A ROOP SINGH BHATI 1. All members are land owner. 271 268M AA MEERA RAI 2.Remaining members have not filled questionnaire 272 268M AB SUNIL KUMAR RAI KOMAL KUMAR 273 268M AC YADAV 274 268M AD HARI SINGH VERMA 275 268M 1 268M AE 57 39 PARVATI BHAGYA NARAYAN 276 268M AF SHARMA AASNARAYAN 277 268M AG SHARMA 278 268M AH NIRMLA DEVI 279 268M AI REETA

119

280 268M AJ MUNNI DEVI 281 268M AK MAMTA SHUKLA 282 268M AL PREM SHEELA DEVI 283 268M AM ASHOK KUMAR 237 268M B SANNO DEVI 240 268M C BRAJESH DEVI 245 268M D BHAVANA 248 268M E JAGAT KUMAR 249 268M F RAMAKANT YADAV NAGENDRA KUMAR 250 268M G YADAV 251 268M H GANESH SINGH 252 268M I SUNAINA DEVI 253 268M J USHA PAL 254 268M K INDU DEVI 255 268M L BABULAL CHAUHAN 256 268M M RAKESH 257 268M N MANJU SINGH 258 268M O LOVE KUSH 259 268M P SATENDRA PRASAD 260 268M Q MANOJ KUMAR RAI 261 268M R MEERA SHARMA 262 268M S RAJKUMAR BHAGAT DHARMENDRA 264 268M T VERMA 265 268M U HEERALAL GUPTA

120

266 268M V DURGA 267 268M W SHOBHA 268 268M X SHASHIRANI PRADEEP KUMAR 269 268M Y SINGH 270 268M Z NISHA 235 287M 287M 0.11500 0.38400 A SHRIPAL All Members are land owner 236 287M 1 B 3 3 MAHIPAL BHATI 242 287M C VINOD 239 313M 1.02900 0.06200 A MONU Mrs. Suman is not fill 1 313M 3 2 241 313M B SONU questionnaire. 501, 1. Mr. Harprasad is not 211 508, 3 501 0.03800 0.03170 A 2 1 HARI KRISHAN mentioned in provided list in 550 khasra no 501, 508. 316, 2. Remaining members have 318, not fill questionnaire. 233 4 508 0.05100 0.04250 A 2 1 HARPRASAD 501, 3. Khasra no 316, 318 are not 508 mentioned in provided list.

550 0.51500 0.51500 3

SATYAVEER SINGH 1. Mr. Brahamjeet and Jagveer 293 417 417 0.03800 0.03800 A 11 2 1 BHATI Singh are not mentioned in 346 417 B INDRAJEET provided list in khasra no 460. 417, 2. Remaining members have 366 2 460 0.03500 0.03500 A 8 1 RATI 460 been not fill questionnaire. 417, 364 460, 3 461 0.13700 0.13700 B 1 1 BRAHAMJEET 461

121

417, 347 460, 463 0.28200 0.28200 A 1 1 JAGVEER SINGH 463 417, 367 460, 464 0.27500 0.27500 A 1 1 MAHAVIR 464 418M 1. Mrs. Jaswati is not 323 , 439, 418M 0.03000 0.01890 A 6 JASWANTI mentioned in provided list in 456 khasra no 439, 456. 2. 418M Mr. Likha is only land owner of 355 , 439, 439 0.58300 0.51010 B 8 RAM RATAN khasra no 456, but 456 he/remaining member are not 3 4 418M fill questionnaire. 356 , 439, 456 0.29200 0.29200 C 1 MAHESH 456 418M 361 , 439, D JAGRITI 456 314 436M 436 0.58800 0.38920 A RISHIPAL Remaining members have not 315 436M B HARISH fill questionnaire. 331 436M C NARENDRA 1 12 6 332 436M D AAZAD 335 436M E BEERWATI 340 436M F SANJAY K BHATI Remaining members have not 214 444M 1 444M 1.68400 0.69380 A 3 1 SUNIL KUMAR fill questionnaire. 297 450 1 450 0.19100 0.19100 A 2 1 VIKENDRA SINGH Mr. Ram Lakhan and Vikendra 449, are land owner. 369 2 449 0.19000 0.19000 A 1 1 RAM LAKHAN 450

122

452, 1. Mr. Karamveer is not 348 452 0.12700 0.12700 A 4 JAGRAM 453 mentioned is provided list in 452, khasra no 454. 349 2 453 0.12700 0.12700 B 7 3 MASTRAM 453 2. Remaining members have 452, not fill questionnaire. 350 C GAJENDRA 453 454, 309 2 454 0.12700 0.12700 A 3 1 KARMVEER 453 333 453 A CHARAN SINGH 1 2 334 453 B PRAKASHO DEVI 300 454 1 A 1 KUSUM 226 456M 1 456 0.34700 0.11580 A 1 1 JAY SINGH Mr. Jay Singh is land owner. 1. Mrs. Poonam, Mrs. Suneeta 362 466M 466 0.31200 0.09300 A POONAM DEVI and Mrs. Susheela Devi are land owner but Mrs. Suneeta is 466M B ANEETA DEVI 363 1 3 3 not fill questionnaire. 2. Mrs. Susheela Devi is not 365 466M C SUSHEELA DEVI mentioned in provided list on khasra no 466M. Mr. Saurabh is not fill 336 472M 1 472 0.37600 0.19040 B 2 1 KARAN SINGH questionnaire Mr. Shrichand is not fill 185 475M 1 475 1.17700 0.33720 A 2 1 AJAB SINGH questionnaire 224 477M 1 477 1.49800 0.33000 A 2 1 BRIJPAL SINGH Remaining members have not 477M fill questionnaire in khasra no 225 , 2 528 0.73100 0.68080 A 9 1 MAMCHAND 528 528M 182 528M A MANGERAM BHATI 223 528M B MANISH BHATI

123

488, 1. Mr. Rajpal is only land owner 337 489, 488 0.28600 0.13860 A 1 5 JITENDRA of khasra no 488, but not fill 497 questionnaire. 488, 2. Mr. Jogendra is only land 368 489, 489 0.33700 0.13860 B 1 JOGENDRA woner of khasra no 489. 497 3. Mr. Jitendra, Mr. Virendra, 488, Rajvir are not mention in 370 489, 3 497 0.53300 0.09050 C 11 RAMNARESH provided list in khasra no 497 497 488, 371 489, D VIRENDRA 497 488, 372 489, E RAJVIR 497 488, 307 2 A 1 VEERENDRA SINGH 497M 497M Mr. Prem Singh is only land 283A 491 0.33700 0.33700 A 1 RAMVEER , 491 owner of khasra no 491, but not 2 497M fill questionnaire 299 B OMVEER , 491 186 494M 1 494 0.38300 0.15150 A 1 RAJVIR SINGH Mr. Rajvir Singh is land owner. 509, 1. Mr. Susheel is not mentioned 509 0.45000 0.02260 A 6 SUSHEEL 521 in provided list in khasra no 285 2 1 509. 2. 521 0.03800 0.01900 3 Remaining members are not fill questionnaire. Mrs. Munesh is not fill 322 518M 1 518 0.07500 0.03400 A 2 1 SAHAB SINGH questionnaire 188 526M 526 1.05500 1.01660 A BRAHAM SINGH All members are land owner. 189 526M 1 B 3 3 DHARMVIR 190 526M C JILE SINGH

124

215 543M 543 2.08200 0.11990 A KAVAR SINGH Remaining members are not fill 221 543M B VIKAS BHATI questionnaire 1 6 4 222 543M C SHYAMA 228 543M D INDRAJEET SINGH 545, 1. All member have been fill 547, Questionnaire of 545, 567. 97 549, 545 0.74600 0.74600 B ROHIT BHATI 2. Total members of 545 & 567 567, are 11. 568 3. Khasra no 547 land is 545, transfer to GNOIDA. 547, 4. Mr. Hardwari and Parmal 98 549, 547 0.01900 0.01900 C VIRENDRA SINGH Singh are fill questionnaire of 567, land 549, 568. 568 5. Leelchand, Hardwari Lal, 545, Parmal, Yashpal, Dhanno Devi 547, have been land of 545 and 567. 99 549, 549 0.05100 0.05100 D ANKUR BHATI 567, 5 8 568 545, 547, 100 549, 567 0.20000 0.20000 E DHANNO 567, 568 545, 547, 101 549, 568 0.44600 0.44600 F GUDDI 567, 568 545, 119 547, G PARMAL SINGH 549,

125

567, 568 545, 547, 120 549, H HARDWARI LAL 567, 568 545, 547M 58 , 549, A SWAMI RAM 567, 568 545, 143 545 A DHANNO DEVI 567 545, 148 2 567 B 3 LILCHAND 567 545, 154 C YASHPAL 567 164A 546M 546 0.55200 0.36800 A NARESH Mr. Naresh and Mr. Rajesh 1 2 2 181 546M B RAJESH KUMAR Kumar are land owner 556M 556M 0.12600 0.06310 SUNDAR SINGH 1. Mrs. Munesh, Ajay have not , 562M 0.17000 0.17000 fill questionnaire against 556M. 6 562M 3 A 1 2. Mr. Sunder is land owner of , 563M 1.10700 0.55350 khasra no 556, 562, 563. 563M 579 1.05000 0.40830 5 RAJPAL 1. Mr. Rajpal is not mentioned 579, 582 0.04400 0.01830 6 in provided list on Khasra no 582, 579, 582, 630. 630, 630 0.50600 0.23910 8 80 6 A 1 2. Mr. Hariram is not mentioned 634, 634 0.49300 0.49300 6 in provided list on Khasra no 635, 635 0.37000 0.31760 6 579. 643 643 2.69200 1.08920 8

126

579, 579 1.05000 0.40830 HARIRAM 92 630, 3 630 0.50600 0.50600 A 1 643 643 2.69200 2.69200 580, 1. Khasra no 704, 825 are not 627, mentioned in provided list. 43 704, 580 0.87300 0.24580 C 10 OM PRAKASH 2. Three questionnaire filled in 757, khasra no 757. 825 3. Remaining members have 627, not filled questionnaire. 580, GYAN CHAND 8 757, 627 2.10600 0.59280 B 11 SHARMA 825, 5 3 704 627, 580, VED PRAKASH 5 825, 704 A SHARMA 757, 704 757 0.02500 0.02000 22 825 - - GYAN CHAND Hari Chand, Chameli Devi, Ajay 29 587 K 587 0.55600 0.40810 A 7 SHARMA Kumar have not fill RAM DUTTA questionnaire. 42 587 K B 1 4 SHARMA BRAHMA DATT 44 587 K C SHARMA 45 587 K D RAJESH SHARMA 588, 1. Mr. Ravindra Pal is not 27 615, 3 588 0.29700 0.03650 B 2 3 RAVINDRA PAL mentioned in provided list. 977

127

588, 37 615, 615 2.68200 0.32600 C BHAGWAT SINGH 977 588,6 7 15, 977 0.29100 0.03570 A RAJPAL SINGH 977 169 588M 588 0.27700 0.27700 A BHAGWAT SINGH Mrs. Poonam is not mentioned 170 588M B GYANVATI DEVI in provided list 1 3 4 187 588M C POONAM 197 588M D RAMPAL SINGH 579 1.05000 0.40830 RAMVIR 1. Mr. Ramvir has not 579, 630 0.50600 0.23910 8 mentioned in provided list on 630, khasra no 925, 646. 635, 635 0.37000 0.31760 6 137 6 A 1 643, 643 2.69200 1.08920 8 646, 646 0.03800 0.00630 2 925 925 0.31860 0.02680 3 Mrs. Dhannu and Dhanpal are 14 591M 1 591M 0.89800 0.07280 A 3 1 PRATAP SINGH not fill questionnaire. Mrs. Maya Devi has filled 13 592M 1 592M 0.75900 0.37950 A 1 1 MAYA DEVI questionnaire but name is not mentioned in provided list. 596M 1. Remaining Members have 105 , 596 0.49900 0.12950 A RISHI not filled questionnaire of 979d khasra no 979. 2 3 596M 2. As per provide list, Mr. 106 , 979 2.05500 1.90850 B 8 PRAVEEN Sunder is only land owner of 979d

128

596M khasra no 596 but not fill 107 , C ATRI questionnaire. 979d 127 979d 1 A 1 KARTAR SINGH 600d 600 1.08800 0.02170 6 DHOOM SINGH Mr. Dhoom Singh is not 112 &[k] 2 A 1 mantioned in provided list. 602] 602 0.15200 0.04750 6 179 610M 610M 1.13400 0.89500 A GYANI 1. Remaining members are not fill questionnaire. 180 610M 1 B 12 3 YOGESH KUMAR 2. Mr. Rajesh is not mentioned in provided list. 205 610M C RAJESH 183 613M 613 1.40800 0.92550 A RAJ SINGH Remaining members are not fill 184 613M 1 B 14 3 MAHIPAL questionnaire 213 613M C MISHRO 616 1.58700 0.39660 3 DHANNU 1. Two members have not filled 616, questionnaire of khasra no 616. 22 2 A 1 974 974 0.99300 0.24840 3 2. Two members have not filled questionnaire of khasra no 974. 617 1.46100 0.73050 2 KUNWAR SINGH 1. Mr. Hem Singh has not filled 617, questionnaire of khasra no 617. 36 2 A 1 978 978 0.30400 0.30400 6 2. Five members have not filled questionnaire of khasra no 978 624M Remaining Members have not DINESH KUMAR 59 , 2 624 0.75900 0.27430 A 9 2 filled questionnaire of both SHARMA 981M khasra 624M 95 , 981 0.45500 0.39370 B 17 VIDYAWATI SHARMA 981M 649, Remaining members have not 18 4 649 2.24100 0.33340 A 23 3 JAGWATI 892, filled questionnaire.

129

895, 899 649, 892, 46 892 0.24000 0.03790 B 13 ASHOK KUMAR 895, 899 649, 892,8 51 895 0.68300 0.09170 C 13 MANOJ KUMAR 95,89 9 899 0.12700 0.01680 13 651, 1. Mr. Rajesh has filled 85 939, 3 651 0.81600 0.62900 A 3 RAJESH questionnaire but not mentione 940 in provided list in khasra no. 651, 651. 89 939, 939 1.11400 0.85870 B 4 3 DHANNU 2. Remaining members have 940 not filled questionnaire. 651, 90 939, 940 0.17700 0.13650 C 4 SARDAR 940 128 653M 0.86000 0.65360 A OM PRAKASH All members have been filled 1 653 2 2 164 653M B SAHIRAM questionnaire. 192 712M 712 0.65000 0.10700 A KRISHNAPAL All members are land owner. RAVINDRA SINGH 230 712M B 1 3 3 BHATI INDERJEET SINGH 231 712M C BHATI 729, 729 A RAJNESH Khasra no 729 is not mentioned 877, in provided list and remaining 135 880, 8 1 members have not filled 891, 877 0.08200 0.08200 15 questionnaire. 930,

130

759, 728, 881 Mr. Om Prakash has not filled 762, 134 762 0.40200 0.12060 A 3 1 OM PRAKASH questionnaire of khasra no 883, 881 890 762, 6 881 2.91800 1.77000 A 41 KESHRAM Remaining members have not 881, filled questionnaire. 82 883 0.02800 0.02700 41 1 883, 890 890 0.64500 0.19360 3 881, Remaining members have not 17 883, 3 995 0.98000 0.96640 A 4 1 KESHVATI filled questionnaire. 995 881, 1. Khasra no 257, 1239 are not 883M mentioned in provided list. 33 257 A KALU , 257, 2. Remaining members have 1239 not filled questionnaire. 881,8 4 3. Kalu is not mentioned in 83 provided list. 131 M,25 1239 A BHAGWAT 7,123 9 763K, Remaining members have not 380 763K A JITENDRA filled questionnaire. H 763K, 381 763K B RAMSINGH 1 763 1.31500 1.15080 19 14 H 763K, 376 A HARKALI KH 763K, 377 B AJAY KUAMR KH

131

763K, 378 C CHAHT RAM KH 763K, 379 D SATISH KUMAR KH 763K, 382 E SHREPAL KH 763K, 383 F AHSOK KUMAR KH 763K, 384 G BHAGMAL KH 763K, 386 H BALVIR SINGH KH 763K, 388 I NEKIRAM KH 763K, 389 J SARDAR KH 385 763 A BRAHMPAL 387 763 B DAYARAM 194 81M 0.83800 0.55870 A RAJAN Mr. Ramchandra and Mr. Rajan 1 81M 2 2 195 81M B RAMCHANDRA are land owner. Mrs. Indresh has not mentioned 67 876 1 876 0.80300 0.40160 A INDRESH in provided list and remaining 8 2 members have not filled 129 876M 1 A VINOD KUMAR questionnaire 880,8 1. Khasra no 728 is not 91, mentioned in proveded list. 930, 2. Remaining members have 136 6 728 A 3 VIJENDRA SINGH 759, not filled questionnaire. 728, 881

132

880,8 91, 930, 139 759 0.45500 0.32850 B 11 ANOOP SINGH 759, 728, 881 880,8 880 0.35800 0.25870 11 SAROJ DEVI 91, 881 2.91800 1.77000 41 930, 140 891 0.64500 0.46590 C 11 759, 728, 930 0.30400 0.21960 11 881 121 900M C BALESHWARI 1. Mrs. Baleshwari is not 122 900M D AADESH KUMAR mentione in provied list. 2. Remaining members have 142 900M 1 900M 1.15100 0.68550 E 7 5 MAHAVIR not filled questionnaire. 109 900M A AKASH BHATI 114 900M B SACHIN BHATI 902, 1. Remaining members have 68 2 902 0.91100 0.39850 A 9 5 RATTO 955 not filled questionnaire. 902, 69 955 0.49300 0.21580 B 7 SANJAY BHATI 955 902, SACHIN KUMAR 70 C 955 BHATI 902, 71 D VIPIN KUMAR BHATI 955 902, 155 E ANAND 955 23 955M 1 A 1 DAYARAM 3 902M 1 902 0.91100 0.39850 A 9 1 DAYARAM

133

904M 1. Mr. Madan is not mentioned 9 , 2 904 0.64500 0.53750 A 5 SANJAY KUMAR in provided list in khasran no 928M 928. 2 904M 2. Remaining members have 28 , 928 1.26500 0.92630 B 34 MADAN not filled auestionnaire. 928M 60 906M 906 1.24000 0.52770 A RAJ SINGH 1. Mr. Mahendra, Hansraj, 61 906M B GYANVATI DEVI Rajesh Bhati are not mentioned in provided list. 62 906M C SUBHASH 2. Remaining members have 63 906M D MAHESH SINGH not filled auestionnaire. 64 906M 1 E 17 9 MAHARAJ SINGH 86 906M F RANSINGH BHATI 87 906M G MAHENDRA 113 906M H HANS RAJ 158 906M I RAJESH BHATI 1. Mr. Madan is not mentioned 908, RAJENDRA SINGH 102 2 953 0.27400 0.10300 A 2 1 in provided list in khasran no 953 BHATI 908, 953. 911, 4 911 1.20700 0.04060 A 5 1 RAJESHWAR BHATI 1. Remaining members have 911 922 0.59500 0.01990 5 not filled questionnaire. K, 91 945 0.68300 0.02290 5 922, 945, 957 0.20800 0.01080 5 957 66 931 1 A 2 GYASI RAM 1. Mrs Kamlesh Devi & Mr. 75 931 B SARDAR Kapil Bhati are not mentioned in provided list on Khasra no 931, 146 B KAPIL BHATI 918, 931. 918 2. Remaining members have 918, 132 2 918 1.60700 1.51780 A 22 1 KAMLESH DEVI not filled questionnaire. 931

134

931, 918, 21 D SHARDA 947, 948 918, 931, RANVEER SINGH 116 931 0.45500 0.40450 B 20 943, BHATI 947 918, 931, 108 4 947 0.03800 0.03380 A 21 3 RAMPAL 947, 948 918, 931, 374 948 0.13000 0.38220 C 21 JUGLA 947, 948 947, 110 2 A 1 KELA 948 919, 1. Remaining members have 83 919 0.67000 0.67000 A 29 6 KULDEEP BHATI 921 not filled questionnaire. 919, 88 921 0.34200 0.34200 B 29 BIJENDRI 921 919, 111 D PRADEEP KUMAR 921 2 919, 118 E RAHUL BHATI 921 919, 159 F SAHIRAM 921 919, 96 C RAME 921 K 19 919 1 A 1 SUKHVEER SINGH

135

919A 26 +919 1 A 1 BRAHAM SINGH B 84 928 1 928 1.26500 0.92630 C 34 14 PRATHI SINGH 1. Remaining members have 928, not filled questionnaire. 47 935, 935 0.07600 0.07390 A 39 10 SANJEEV KUMAR 2. Mr. Prathi Singh is not fill 936 questionnaire of khasra no 935, 928, 936. 48 935, 936 0.20200 0.19640 B 39 10 DHANPALI 3. Mr. Chandra Pal Singh Bhati 936 is not mentioned in khasra no 928, 969, 997, 935, 936. 52 935, C VIRENDRA 4. Mr. Ram Kumar is not 936 mentioned in khasra no 928, 928, 935, 936. 77 935, D NABAV SINGH BHATI 936 3 928, 124 935, E RAJKUMAR 936 928, 125 935, F JEETU 936 928, 153 935, G RAM KUMAR 936 928, 156 935, H VEERENDRA 936 935, 65 A 2 HARI 936 2 935, DHARMENDRA 93 B 936 SINGH

136

928, 935, 78 936, 969 0.69400 0.40490 A 3 2 MAMCHAND SINGH 969, 997 5 928, 935, CHANDRA PAL 79 936, 997 0.73900 0.45780 B 7 2 SINGH BHATI 969, 997 20 928M A PARMESHWARI 30 928M 1 B JAGRITI 57 928M C KAMAL 929, 1. Khasra No 951 is not 94 934, 929 0.11400 0.00840 A 6 3 BALRAM BHATI mentioned in provided list. 951 2. Remaining members have 929, not filled questionnaire. 117 934, 3 934 1.07500 0.12000 B 6 3 SATTO 951 929, 149 934, 951 C VED PAL SINGH 951 932, 1. Remaining members have 31 932 0.26600 0.26600 A 53 2 SANJEEV KUMAR 971 not filled questionnaire. 2 932, 2. Mr. Bhanwar Singh, Mr. Hem 39 971 3.69800 3.38640 B 53 SHYAMI 971 Singh, Mr. Udayvir Singh is not 932, mentioned in provided list in 10 971, 1.67360 1.67360 A 9 MEGHRAM khasra no 973. 990 3 990 59 932, 12 971, B KARAN SINGH 990

137

932, 15 971, C AJEET SINGH 990 932, 16 971, D BRAHAM SINGH 990 932, 34 971, E HEMRAJ 990 932, 35 971, F SONU BHATI 990 932, 145 971, G ANKIT BHATI 990 990M , 1 H BIRENDRA SINGH 971M , 932 990M , 2 I JITENDRA 971M , 932 971, 81 2 A 1 REETU 990 25 990M C VIJAY BHATI 144 990M D RAJWATI 1 4 157 990M E RAJVEER 162 990M F RAJESH KUMAR 932, 53 973, 3 973 1.34100 0.77770 A 14 3 BHANWAR SINGH 990

138

932, 54 973, B HEM SINGH 990 932, 55 973, C UDAYVIR SINGH 990 123 973 A SATENDRA 1 2 126 973 B JUGENDRA 961M 1. Remaining members have , 2 961 0.05100 0.02990 A 21 SUMAN DEVI not filled questionnaire. 147 967M 1 967 0.69400 0.40490 21 964 Mr. Ram Chander has not filled 24 A+96 964 0.22800 0.13160 A 3 2 JAIBHAGWAN questionnaire 4B 1 964d, 103 B RAMDAS 964[k 973M 1. Some members are filled , 2 973 1.34100 0.77700 A 14 1 GYANI questionnaire but remaining 881M members are not filled 4 questionnaire. 881 2.91800 1.77000 41 2. Mr. Gyani is not mentioned in provided list in khasra no 881. 976, 1. Remaining members have 150 2 976 0.29100 0.15180 A 6 RAJ SINGH 978 not filled questionnaire. 976, 2. Mr. Raj Singh is not 160 978 0.30400 0.30400 B 7 BALESHWAR 978 mentioned in provided list in 976, khasra no 976, 978. 161 C BALRAM 978 Mr. Brajpal has not fill 173 97M 1 97M 0.74700 0.16600 A 2 1 SATYAPAL SINGH questionnaire

139

Remaining members have not 141 980M 1 980 0.45500 0.02480 A 15 1 BHANWAR SINGH filled questionnaire. Remaining members have not 41 998M 1 998 1.08800 0.28600 A 8 1 DHARMVEER SINGH filled questionnaire. Source: Primary Survey and Bhulekh Record at villages of “Chamrawali Bodaki- Chitehara – Katehara – Palla” - DIZs

12.2 Annexure: Survey Questionnaire 12.3 Orders and Letters 12.4 Census Details of Dadri Tehsil 12.5 Design layout of MMTH and Freight Village

140

Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, U.P. ofo|ky;] xzsVj uks,Mk] m0iz0 xkSre cq) fo” Photo ¼rLohj½

Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor Project

SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Lkkekftd lek?kkr fu/kkZj.k

Questionnaire (iz’ukoyh)

QUESTIONNAIRE NUMBER iz’ukoyh la[;k…………….. DATE frfFk………………..

A. DETAILS OF AREA {ks= dk C;kSjk

Village/ xkWao xkSre cq) uxj Tehsil / rglhy Gautam Budh Nagar xkSre cq) uxj District / ftyk Gautam Budh Nagar

State/ jkT; Uttar Pradesh mRrj izns’k

B. DETAILS OF RESPONDENT mRrjnkrk dk C;kSjk 1. Name (Head of the Family) uke ¼ifjokj dk eqf[k;k½ - 2. Age (Year) Less than 40 40-60 60-80 80 and above mez ¼o”kZ½ 3. Gender fyax Male iq:”k Female efgyk Other vU; 4. Educational Qualification ‘kSf{kd ;ksX;rk (Qualification Profile) Uneducated ¼vf’kf{kr½ Upto 8th ¼ikWapoh ls de½ 10th ¼nloh½ 12th ¼ckjoh½

Graduate ¼iwoZLukrd½ Postgraduate ¼ijk&Lukrd½ Any Other Skill Development Programme, specify name…………………………… 5. Contact Details ¼laidZ lw=½ 6. Aadhar Details ¼vk/kkj fooj.k½ 7. Category oxZ SC ¼vuqlwfpr tkfr½ ST ¼vuqlwfpr tutkfr½ OBC ¼vU; fiNM+k oxZ½ General ¼lkekU;½

8. Caste ¼tkfr½ 9. Religion ¼/keZ½ Hindu ¼fgUnw½ Muslim ¼eqfLye½ Sikh ¼fl[k½ Christian ¼bZlkbZ½ Other (Specify) vU; ¼Li”V djsa½ 10. Monthly income (in Rupees Thousands) – 1. No Stable Income ¼dksbZ LFkk;h vk; ugha½ 2. Less than Rs. 4000/- month ¼:- 4]000 gtkj izfr ekg ls de½ 3. Rs. 4- 10 Thousands ¼:- 4&10 gtkj izfr ekg½ 4. Rs. 10 – 20 Thousands ¼:- 10&20 gtkj izfr ekg½ 5. Rs. 20 – 50 Thousands ¼:- 20&50 gtkj izfr ekg½ 6. Rs. 50 Thousand and above ¼:- 50 gtkj izfr ekg vkSj mlls vf/kd½ 11. Source of income: a. Agriculture ¼d`f”k½ b. Non-Agriculture ¼vU; Jksr½ c. Unemployed ¼csjkstxkj½ Page | 1

11.a If agriculture, exact nature of source of income; ¼d`f”k vk; Jksr ds vk/kkj ij½ i. Agriculture labour ¼[ksfrgj etnwj½ ii. Cultivator ¼[ksfrgj@d`”kd½ iii. Any other, please specify ¼vU;] Li”V djs½ 11.b If Non-agriculture: exact nature of source of income, Please specify i. Govt. Service ¼ljdkjh lsok½ ii. Private Service ¼futh lsok½ iii. Business (Nature of Business) –¼O;kikj½ iv. Artisan f’kYidkj½ v. Labour ¼etnwj½ vi. Other source of income (specify) ¼vU;½

C. Details of Family Members including the Head of the family ifjokj ds eqf[k;k ,oa lnL;ksa dk fooj.k along with INVOLVEMENT OF FAMILY IN ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES vkfFkZd vk; dh izfØ;kvksa esa ifjokj dh lgHkkfxrk 1. Name of Member 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 lnL;dk uke

2. Name (to be written Write down the name of all vertically) uke members/persons who live ¼yEcor fy[ksa½ and eat together in the household starting with Head.¼lHkh lnL;ksa@ O;fDr;ksa dk uke nsa tks lkFk jgrs gSaA eqf[k;k ls izkjEHk djsA½ 3. Relationship with head of the family ¼ifjokj ds eqf[k;k ds lkFk fj’rk½ 4. Gender ¼fyax½ 1. Male 2. Female 3. Other 5. Age (Year) mez ¼o”kZ½ 1. 0-18 2. 18-35 3. 35-50 4. 50-60 5. Greater than 60 6. Marital status 1. Married ¼oSokfgd fLFkfr½ 2. Unmarried 3. Divorce 4. Separated 5. Widow 6. Widower 7. Education 1. Uneducated/Illiterate qualifications 2. Upto 8th th ¼’kSf{kd ;ksX;rk½ 3. 10 4. 12th 5. Graduate 6. Postgraduate 7. Any Other Skills Page | 2

7A. 12th Stream 1. Science 2. Arts 3. Commerce 4. Any other 7 B. Graduate 1. Science ¼Lukrd½ 2. Arts 3. Commerce 4. Medical 5. Engineering 6. Any other 7C. Post 1. Science (M.Sc.) Graduate 2. Arts (M.A.) ¼ijkLukrd½ 3. Commerce (M.Com) 4. Medical (MD/MS) 5. Engineering (M.Tech.) 6. Any other 8. Occupation ¼O;olk;½ 1. Agriculture Cultivator 2. Business 3. Govt. Service 4. Private Service 5. Artisan 6. Labour 7. Agriculture Labour 8. Unemployed* 9. Other (Specify) *Unemployment Status (in months) 9. Classification of 1. Legislators, Senior Occupations - NCO- Officials, and Managers – 2015 ND 2. Professional -IV 3. Associate Professionals - III 4. Clerks - II 5. Service Workers and Shop & Market Sales Workers - II 6. Skilled Agricultural and Fishery Workers - II 7. Craft and related Trades Workers -II 8. Plant and Machine Operators and Assemblers - II 9. Elementary Occupations –I 10. Not Applicable (NA) 10. Monthly income 1. No stable income (Rs. in thousand) 2. Less than 4000/- month ¼ekfld vk;½ 3. 4- 10 Thousands

Page | 3

¼:- gtkj esa½ 4. 10 – 20 Thousands 5. 20 – 50 Thousands 6. 50 Thousand and above 11. Family Total income (Amount in Rs) 1. BPL ¼ifjokj dh dqy vk;½ 2. Less than 1 Lakh 3. 1-3 Lakh 4. 3-5Lakh 5. 5-8 Lakh 6. 8-10 Lakh 7. 10 Lakh and above 12. Role of Women in 1. Head¼eqf[k;k½ Family ¼ifjokj esa 2. Homemaker¼x`g.kh½ L=h dh Hkwfedk½ 3. Any Others ¼vU;½ 13. Any Disease ¼dksbZ Please specify below chekjh½/Chronic Ailment ¼iqjkuh chekjh½ / Malnourished ¼dqiksf”kr½ 14. Any Health Insurance Yes¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ ¼LokLF; chek½

D. INFORMATION REGARDING LAND AND LIVELIHOOD ¼Hkwfe vkSj vkthfodk ls lEcaf/kr tkudkjh½

1 How much total area of land owned by household ¼ifjokj ds ikl ekStwn tehu½ Net Agricultural Use (Acre) Non-agricultural Use; Barren (Acre) Gross (Acre) [ksrh ;ksX; tehu ¼,dM+½ vd`f”k&;ksX;( catj½ tehu ¼,dM+½ dqy ¼,dM+½

2 How much of the PAF’ agricultural land belong to the following categories? [ksrh ;ksX; tehu dk {ks= fuEu Jsf.k;ksa esaA Irrigated No irrigated Fertile (Acre) Non- Fertile Orchard/ Water Source lokZf/kd mitkÅ Land (Acre) Land (Acre) (Acre) de Tree (Acre) ikuh flfpr Hkwfe vflafpr Hkwfe ¼,dM+½ mitkÅ ¼,dM+½ Plantation dk Jksr ¼,dM+½ ¼,dM+½ ¼,dM+½ (Acre) ckx@ o`{kkjksi.k ¼,dM+½

3 How do you use your private assets? vki viuh O;fDrxr lEifRr dk mi;ksx dSls djrs gS\ Agriculture¼[ksrh½ Plantation ¼o`{kkjksi.k½ Commercial ¼O;kolkf;d½ Industry/MSME m|ksx@NksVs vkSj ek/;e m|ksx Domestic ¼futh½ Others (Specify) vU; Li”V djsa 4 Do you own cottage for your livestock? D;k vkids ikl eosf’k;ksa ds fy, >ksiM+h gS\ Yes¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ If yes, mention the total area and no of cottages. ;fn gkWa] rks dqy {ks=Qy vkSj >ksifM+;ksa dh la[;k crk;saA

5 Number of livestock owned by the household. ifjokj ds ikyrw eosf’k;ksa dh la[;k Cow ¼xk;½ Buffalo ¼HkSal½ Goat ¼cdjh½ Horse¼?kksM+k½ Others ¼vU;½ Total ¼dqy½

Page | 4

6 Number of people migrated from family to other places for ifjokj ls fuEu voljksa gsrq foLFkkfir lnL;ksa dh la[;k Education Employment ¼jkstxkj½ Others ¼vU;½ Total ¼dqy½ ¼f’k{kk½

7 Do you have your own house? D;k vkids ikl viuk edku gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No¼ugha½

If yes, mention the total area and no of huts/houses ¼;fn gkWa rks dqy {ks=Qy vkSj >ksifM+;ksa@edku dh la[;k crk,saA½ 8 Number of private vehicles owned. futh okguksa dh la[;kA 2 Wheeler 4 Wheeler Tractor ¼VªSDVj½ Others ¼vU;½ Total ¼dqy½ ¼nqifg;k½ ¼pkjifg;k½

9 Do you own agricultural equipments and other machinery? D;k vkids ikl [ksrh djus ds fy;s lgk;d midj.k RkFkk vU; e’khujh gS\ Yes¼gkWa½ No¼ugha½ If yes, specify the details. ;fn gkWa rks fooj.k nsaA

E. INFORMATION ABOUT TREES ON LAND Hkwfe ij isM+ksa ls lEcfU/kr tkudkjh Name of the Tree No. Girth Size (in cm) Name of the tree No. Girth size (in cm) ¼isM+ dk uke½ ¼la[;k½ ifjf/k dh uki ¼ls- ¼isM+ dk uke½ ¼la[;k½ ifjf/k dh uki eh-½ ¼ls-eh-½ 1. 5 2 6 3. 7 4. 8. F. INFORMATION ABOUT CROPS / Qlyksa dk fooj.k S. No. Main Crops Grown mxkbZ tkus okyh Average yield/hectare vkSlr mit@gsDVs;j dz- la- eq[; Qlysa 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. G. Vulnerability Status of Family - 1. Economic Status AAY (ANTYODAYA Anna Yojana) ¼vUR;ksn;½ BPL ¼xjhch js[kk ls uhps½ APL ¼xjhch js[kk ds Åij½ Yellow Card Red Card Orange Card

WIDOW¼fo/kok½ DIIFERENTLY ABLE¼fnO;kax½ ORPHAN¼vukFk½

ELDERLY (ABOVE 60 YEARS WITHOUT DEPENDENT) ofj”B ¼60 lky ls Åij] ftudk dksbZ vkfJr ugha gSA½

Page | 5

None of These ¼buesa ls dksbZ ugha½

2. Info about Infant Mortality Number ¼f’k’kqe`R;q nj½ Year¼o”kZ½

3. Total income of family from all sources of income (Rs.per month) ifjokj dh lHkh Jksrksa ls dqy vk; ¼#0 izfr ekg½ 1. No Stable Income ¼dksbZ LFkk;h vk; ugha½ 2. Less than Rs. 4000/- month ¼:- 4]000 gtkj izfr ekg ls de½ 3. Rs. 4- 10 Thousands ¼:- 4&10 gtkj izfr ekg½ 4. Rs. 10 – 20 Thousands ¼:- 10&20 gtkj izfr ekg½ 5. Rs. 20 – 50 Thousands ¼:- 20&50 gtkj izfr ekg½ 6. Rs. 50 Thousand and above ¼:- 50 gtkj izfr ekg vkSj mlls vf/kd½ 4. If You are an Agricultural Cultivator, i. Cultivating by Self ¼d`”kd½ ii. Land Tenure ¼iV~Vsnkjh½ iii. Cultivating through people employed (Number of people ……………Number of month……..…….) ¼[ksrh esa yxs yksx------ekg dh la[;k------½ 5. Whether any family member has taken loan from any source? D;k ifjokj ds fdlh lnL; us fdlh Jksr ls dksbZ dtZ fy;k gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ If yes, specify the amount (Rs.) and source of loan- ;fn gkWa rks dtZ dk L=ksr rFkk ewY; ¼#0½ crk;saA Formal Source ¼vkSipkfjd½ 1. Govt. Bank Amount in 2. Pvt Bank Rs 3. Cooperative Society 4. Others ¼vU;½ Informal Source Specify: Amount in ¼vukSipkfjd½ Rs Total Amount Rs ¼dqy jkf’k #0½ 6. Do any women of family have formal source (monthly salary) of employment? D;k ifjokj dh fdlh L=h ds ikl vkSipkfjd jkstxkj dk lk/ku ¼izfrekg osru½ gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ If yes, amount (Rs.) of monthly salary, ;fn gkWa rks izfrekg osru #0 ------7. Do any women of family have informal source of employment? D;k ifjokj dh fdlh efgyk ds ikl vukSipkfjd jkstxkj gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ 8. If yes, amount of wage per day (Rs.) ;fn gka rks izfrfnu dh etnwjh #0------9. i. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Employability¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkids jkstxkj ij D;k IkzHkko iM+sxk\½ ii. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Earning capability¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkidh thfodk vtZu esa ij D;k IkzHkko iM+sxk\½ iii. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Social Position¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkidh lkekftd fLFkfr ij D;k IkzHkko iM+sxk\½ iv. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Cultural Ethos ¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkidh lkaLd`frd thou ij D;k IkzHkko iM+sxk\½ v. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Family Structure¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkidh ifjokj

vkidh ikfjLFkfrd dY;k.k ij D;k IkzHkko iM+sxk\½ 10. What are preferred rehabilitation/resettlement measures? iquZokl @ iquZLFkkiu mik;ksa esa D;k izkFkkfdrk gS\ Measure ¼mik;½ 1- 2- 3-

H. HOW OFTEN DO YOU ACCESS NATURAL OR COMMON RESOURCES? lkoZtfud vFkok izkd`frd lalk/kuksa dk mi;ksx djus dh vko`fRr 1 How do you often access common or public owned property (canals, ponds, tube wells, etc)? vki lkoZtfud lalk/kuksa dk mi;ksx fdruk djrs gSa ¼ugj] tyk’k;] V;wcsy] vkfn½\ Rarely ¼dHkh&dHkh½ Mostly ¼T;knkrj½ Don’t Use ¼mi;ksx ugh djrs½ 2 How often do you use public transport facilities (buses, etc)? vki lkoZtfud ;krk;kr dk iz;ksx fdruk djrs gS\ Rarely ¼dHkh&dHkh½ Mostly ¼T;knkrj½ Don’t Use ¼mi;ksx ugh djrs½ 3 How is road connectivity in your area? vkids {ks= esa lM+d lqfo/kk dSlh gS\ Good ¼vPNh½ Bad ¼cqjh½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugh½ 4 How regular do you go to the nearest market? vki utnhdh cktkj esa fdl varjky ij tkrs gS\ Rarely ¼dHkh&dHkh½ Mostly ¼T;knkrj ½ Daily ¼izfrfnu½ 5 Have you ever participated in dairy cooperatives/agricultural cooperatives? D;k vkius nw/k vFkok d`f”k dh lgdkfjrk ;kstukvksa esa dHkh Hkkx fy;k gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Don’t Remember ¼;kn ugh½ 6 Have you ever been a member of D;k vki dHkh% Lo;a lgk;rk lewg ;k ,sls vU; laxBu ds lnL; jgs gSa\ 1. ‘Self Help Group’ (SHG) Yes /No 2. Any other such associations? Yes /No [If Yes, please specify……………………] 7 What are the sources of energy for cooking? [kkuk idkus esa iz;qDr ÅtkZ dk Jksr D;k gS\ LPG Cylinder Firewood Kerosene oil Leaf/Straw Others ¼flfyaMj½ ¼ydM+h½ feVVh dk rsy ifRr;kWa@iqvky vU;

8 Resources of lighting ¼mtkys dk Jksr½ Electricity Kerosene ¼feV~Vh Battery ¼cSVjh½ Solar Energy Others ¼fctyh½ dk rsy½ ¼lkSj&ÅtkZ½ ¼vU;½

9 Sources of Drinking Water ¼is; ty dk Jksr½ PHED Supply Hand Pump ¼gSaM Well ¼dqvkWa½ Stream/Pond ¼unh] Others iEi½ rkykc½ ¼vU;½ Water ¼ih-,p- bZ-Mh-vkiwfrZ½

10 Sanitation Facility ¼LoPNrk lqfo/kk½ Community Flush/Pucca Toilet Kutcha/Pit Open Defecation Others ¼dPpk@xM~<+k½ ¼[kqys esa eyR;kx½ ¼vU;½ Toilet ¼Qy’k@iDdk ¼lkeqnkf;d ‘kkSpky;½ ‘kkSpky;½

11 Do you have bathrooms? ¼D;k vkids ;gkWa Lukukxkj gS\½ Inside House Outside House¼?kj Community Bathroom¼lkeqfgd Lukukxkj½ ¼?kj ds Hkhrj½ ds ckgj½

Page | 7

I. COMMON RESOURCES AND PUBLIC AMENITIES ¼lkekftd lalk/ku ,oa lqfo/kk,sa½ 1 Are you aware of land acquisition in this area? D;k vki bl {ks= Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls voxr gaS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugha½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugha½ 2 Is there any community center and civic space in this area? D;k bl {ks= esa dksbZ lkeqnkf;d dsUnz ;k ukxfjd LFkku gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugha½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugha½ 3 Is there any temple/mosque /any other such religious place present in this area? D;k bl {ks= esa dksbZ dksbZ eafnj@ efLtn vFkok dksbZ vU; /kkfeZd LFkku miyC/k gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugh½ 4 Is there proper water supply facility available in this area? D;k bl {ks= esa ty forj.k dh leqfpr O;oLFkk miyC/k gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugha½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugh½ 5 Is there proper sewage system available to every house in this area? D;k bl {ks= ds izR;sd ?kj esa lhost ¼ey½ O;oLFkk gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugha½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugh½ 6 Is there proper electricity distribution system in this area? D;k bl {ks= esa fo|qr dh leqfpr forj.k O;oLFkk miyC/k gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugha½ 7 Is electricity available to this area (24*7)? D;k bl {ks= esa iwjs lIrkg esa 24 ?k.Vs fctyh miyC/k gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugh½ 8 Are better roads provided to connect every house in this area? D;k bl {ks= esa izR;sd ?kj rd igqWapus ds fy, vPNh lM+das miyC/k gSa\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugh½ 9 Is there any school available in this area? D;k bl {ks= esa dksbZ fo|ky; miyC/k gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugh½ If yes, specify the details of school.;fn gkWa rks fo|ky; dk fooj.k nsaA Primary izkFkfed Secondary ek/;fed Senior Secondary mPp ek/;fed 10 Is there health facility center or hospital available in this area? D;k bl {ks= esa LokLF; lqfo/kk dsUnz ;k vLirky miyC/k gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugh½ 11 Is there any ANGANAWADI center in this area? D;k bl {ks= esa dksbZ vkxuokM+h dsUnz gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugh½ 12 Is there any fair public distribution system (PDS) available in this area? D;k bl {ks= esa lkoZtfud forj.k dsUnz dh lqfo/kk miyC/k gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugh½ 13 Is there any social gathering center available for women in this area? D;k bl {ks= esa efgykvksa ds fy;s dksbZ lkoZtfud ,df=r {ks= gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Don’t Know ¼irk ugh½ 14 What is the crime rate in this area? bl {ks= esa vijk/k nj fdruh gS\ Low Medium High

Page | 8

J. IMPACT ANALYSIS OF ACQUISTION ON LAND, LIVELIHOOD AND INCOME

Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k] thou ;kiu rFkk vk; ij izHkko dk fo’ys”k.k

1 Do you think there will be increase in employment productivity in the area? D;k {ks= esa jkstxkj mRikndrk esa o`f) gksxh\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugha½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 2 Do you think there will be an increase in business opportunity in the area? D;k {ks= esa vkS/kksfxd volj esa o`f) gksxh\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugha½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 3 Do you think there will be increase in land price in the area?D;k {ks= esa Hkwfe dh dher esa o`f) gksxh\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugha½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 4 Do you think there will be an increase in public facility in the area?D;k{ks= esa lkoZtfud lqfo/kk esa o`f) gksxh\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugha½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugha ldrs½ 5 Do you think there will be an increase in formal employment productivity in the area? D;k {ks= esa vkSipkfjd jkstxkj mRikndrk esao`f) gksxhA\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugha½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugha ldrs½ 6 Do you think there will be an increase in standard of living in the area? D;k {ks= esa jgus ds ekud esa o`f) gksxh\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 7 Do you think there will be an increase in standard of living in the area? D;k {ks= esa O;fDr ds vk; esa o`f) gksxh\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 8 Do you think there will be an increase in food security in the area?D;k{ks= esa [kk| lqj{kk esa o`f) gksxh\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 9 Do you think there will be an increase in women employment productivity in the area? D;k {ks= esa efgykvksa ds jkstxkj mRikndrk esa o`f) gksxh\

Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 10 Do you think there will be an increase in standard of living in the area? D;k bl {ks= esa thou ekud esa o`f) gksxh\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 11 Does acquisition affect the local economy of the area? D;k vf/kdj.k {ks= dh vkfFkZdh dks izHkkfor djrk gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 12 Do you think there will be an increase in economic dependency in the area? D;k {ks= esa vkfFkZd fuHkZjrk esa o`f) gksxh\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 13 Do you think there will be an increase in access of productive resources to people in the area? D;k {ks= esa yksxksa dks mRikn lalk/kuksa dh miyC/krk esa o`f) gksxh\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 14 How does acquisition affect the wildlife (if any) of the area? vf/kxzg.k fdl izdkj {ks= ds oU;thou ¼;fn gks½ dks izHkkfor djrk gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½

Page | 9

15 Are there any wild plant and wild animal in the area? D;k bl {ks= esa taxyh ikS/ks vkSj taxyh tkuoj gS\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ If yes, specify. ;fn gkWa rks crk,a% Wild Plant taxyh ikS/ks Wild Animal taxyh tkuoj

K. IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL RESOURCES

HkkSfrd lalk/kuksa ij izHkko dk fo’ys”k.k

1 How might this project impact the soil of the surrounding area? ;g ifj;kstuk vklikl ds {ks= dh feV~Vh dks dSls izHkkfor djsxh\ Positive ¼ldkjkRed½ Negative ¼udkjkRed½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 2 How might this project impact the air quality of the surrounding area? bl ifj;kstuk dk vklikl ds {ks= ds gokbZ feJ.k ij D;k izHkko iMs+xk\ Positive ¼ldkjkRed½ Negative ¼udkjkRed½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 3 How might this project impact the water source, water reserve and underground water table of the surrounding area? ;g ifj;kstuk vkl&ikl ds {ks= ds ty Jksr] ikuh Hk.Mkj vkSj Hkwfexr ty rkfydk dks dSls izHkkfor djsxh\ Positive ¼ldkjkRed½ Negative ¼udkjkRed½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 4 How might this project impact the forest reserve, if any, of the surrounding area? ;g ifj;kstuk vkl&ikl ds {ks= ds lqjf{kr oUkdks] ;fn miyC/k gks] dSls izHkkfor djsxh\ Positive ¼ldkjkRed½ Negative ¼udkjkRed½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½ 5 Do you think that this project may increase the noise pollution in the surrounding area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd ;g ifj;kstuk vkl&ikl ds {ks= esa /ofu iznw”k.k c<+k;sxh\ Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ Can’t Say ¼dg ugh ldrs½

L. IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PRIVATE ASSETS, PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES

O;fDrxr lEifŸk] lkoZtfud lsokvksa rFkk mi;ksfxrkvksa ij izHkko dk fo’ys”k.k

1 Do you think there will be an increase in health facility/hospital in the area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd {ks= esa LokLF; lqfo/kkvksa@vLirky esa c

6 Do you think there will be an increase in value of private asset in the area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd {ks= esa O;fDrxr laifRr dk ewY; c

M. AWARENESS ABOUT PROJECT ifj;kstuk ds ckjs esa tkudkjh

Does the respondent know about Yes ¼gkWa½ No ¼ugh½ the project? D;k mRrjnkrk dks ifj;kstuk dh tkudkjh gS\ If Yes, Means of Awareness 1. Newspaper lekpkj i= ;fn gkWa] rks tkudkjh dk Jksr 2. TV nwjn’kZu 3. Word of Mouth fdlh ds }kjk 4. Govt. officials ljdkjh vf/kdkfj;ksa ls 5. Others vU;

Page | 11

Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, U.P. xkSre cq) fo”ofo|ky;] xzsVj uks,Mk] m0iz0

Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor Project SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Lkkekftd lek?kkr fu/kkZj.k

Focus Group Discussion (FGD)

A. DETAILS OF AREA / RESPONDENT (Gata No.) {ks= dk C;kSjk Village/xkWao 1. 5. Gata No 2. 6. 3. 7. 4. 8.

B. Basic Details 1 What is your source of income?

2 If agriculture, exact nature of source of income;

3 If Non-agriculture: exact nature of source of income;

4 Describe role of Women in Family

5 Do you use your private assets for the domestic use or Commercial purpose?

6 What type of card do you have? AAY¼vUR;ksn;½-BPL ¼xjhch js[kk ls uhps½APL ¼xjhch js[kk ds Åij½ Yellow Card Red Card Orange Card

7 i. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Employability¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkids jkstxkj ij D;k IkzHkko iM+sxk\½

Page | 1

ii. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Earning capability¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkidh thfodk vtZu esa ij D;k IkzHkko iM+sxk\½

iii. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Social Position¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkidh lkekftd fLFkfr ij D;k IkzHkko iM+sxk\½

iv. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Cultural Ethos ¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkidh lkaLd`frd thou ij D;k IkzHkko iM+sxk\½

v. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Family Structure¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkidh ifjokj

vi. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Mental Wellness¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkids ekufld Lrj ij D;k IkzHkko iM+sxk\½

vii. How is Land Acquisition going to affect your Ecological Wellness¼Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k ls vkidh ikfjLFkfrd dY;k.k ij D;k IkzHkko iM+sxk\½

C. OPINION ABOUT IMPACT OF ACQUISTION ON LAND, LIVELIHOOD AND INCOME (Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k] thou ;kiu rFkk vk; ij izHkko dk fo’ys”k.k½

1 Do you think there will be increase in employment productivity in the area? D;k {ks= esa jkstxkj mRikndrk esa o`f) gksxh\

2 Do you think there will be an increase in business opportunity in the area? D;k {ks= esa vkS/kksfxd volj esa o`f) gksxh\

3 Do you think there will be increase in land price in the area?D;k {ks= esa Hkwfe dh dher esa o`f) gksxh\

4 Do you think there will be an increase in public facility in the area?D;k{ks= esa lkoZtfud lqfo/kk esa o`f) gksxh\

5 Do you think there will be an increase in formal employment productivity in the area? D;k {ks= esa vkSipkfjd jkstxkj mRikndrk esao`f) gksxhA\

Page | 2

6 Do you think there will be an increase in standard of living in the area? D;k {ks= esa jgus ds ekud esa o`f) gksxh\

7 Do you think there will be an increase in standard of living in the area? D;k {ks= esa O;fDr ds vk; esa o`f) gksxh\

8 Do you think there will be an increase in food security in the area?D;k{ks= esa [kk| lqj{kk esa o`f) gksxh\

9 Do you think there will be an increase in women employment productivity in the area? D;k {ks= esa efgykvksa ds jkstxkj mRikndrk esa o`f) gksxh\

10 Do you think there will be an increase in standard of living in the area? D;k bl {ks= esa thou ekud esa o`f) gksxh\

11 Does acquisition affect the local economy of the area? D;k vf/kdj.k {ks= dh vkfFkZdh dks izHkkfor djrk gS\

12 Do you think there will be an increase in economic dependency in the area? D;k {ks= esa vkfFkZd fuHkZjrk esa o`f) gksxh\

13 Do you think there will be an increase in access of productive resources to people in the area? D;k {ks= esa yksxksa dks mRikn lalk/kuksa dh miyC/krk esa o`f) gksxh\

14 How does acquisition affect the wildlife (if any) of the area? vf/kxzg.k fdl izdkj {ks= ds oU;thou ¼;fn gks½ dks izHkkfor djrk gS\

15 Are there any wild plant and wild animal in the area? D;k bl {ks= esa taxyh ikS/ks vkSj taxyh tkuoj gS\

Page | 3

D. OPINION ABOUT IMPACT ON PHYSICAL RESOURCES (HkkSfrd lalk/kuksa ij izHkko dk fo’ys”k.k½

1 How might this project impact the soil of the surrounding area? ;g ifj;kstuk vklikl ds {ks= dh feV~Vh dks dSls izHkkfor djsxh\

2 How might this project impact the air quality of the surrounding area? bl ifj;kstuk dk vklikl ds {ks= ds gokbZ feJ.k ij D;k izHkko iMs+xk\

3 How might this project impact the water source, water reserve and underground water table of the surrounding area? ;g ifj;kstuk vkl&ikl ds {ks= ds ty Jksr] ikuh Hk.Mkj vkSj Hkwfexr ty rkfydk dks dSls izHkkfor djsxh\

4 How might this project impact the forest reserve, if any of the surrounding area? ;g ifj;kstuk vkl&ikl ds {ks= ds lqjf{kr oUkdks] ;fn miyC/k gks] dSls izHkkfor djsxh\

5 Do you think that this project may increase the noise pollution in the surrounding area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd ;g ifj;kstuk vkl&ikl ds {ks= esa /ofu iznw”k.k c<+k;sxh\

E. OPINION ABOUT IMPACT ON PRIVATE ASSETS, PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES (O;fDrxr lEifŸk] lkoZtfud lsokvksa rFkk mi;ksfxrkvksa ij izHkko dk fo’ys”k.k½

1 Do you think there will be an increase in health facility/hospital in the area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd {ks= esa LokLF; lqfo/kkvksa@vLirky esa c

2 Do you think there will be an increase in educational facility/schools/colleges in the area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd {ks= esa f’k{kk lqfo/kkvksa@Ldwyksa@dkWystksa esa c<+ksRrjh gksxh\

3 Do you think there will be an increase in housing capacity and facility in the area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd {ks= esa vkokl {kerk rFkk lqfo/kk esa o`f) gksxh\

4 Do you think there will be an increase in supply of local services/house help in the area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd {ks= esa LFkkuh; lsokvksa@?kjsyw lgk;dksa dh vkiwfrZ c<+sxh\

Page | 4

5 Do you think there will be an increase in electricity availability in the area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd {ks= esa fo|qr vkiwfrZ c

6 Do you think there will be an increase in value of private asset in the area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd {ks= esa O;fDrxr laifRr dk ewY; c

7 Do you think there will be an improvement in the availability of resources to people in the area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd {ks= esa yksxksa ds fy, vPNs lalk/kuksa dh miyC/krk c

8 Do you think there will be an increase in transportation and road facility in the area? D;k vkidks yxrk gS fd {ks= esa vkokxeu vkSj lM+d lqfo/kk,sa c

F. ANY OTHER OPINION/OBSERVATION ABOUT PROJECT IMPACT ON WELLBEING OF THE PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES (PAFs)

Page | 5

TABLE 30: NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF MAIN WORKERS, MARGINAL WORKERS, AND NON- WORKERS BY SEX IN TAHSILS, 2011 Serial Name of Tahsil Persons Total Main workers Marginal workers Total workers Non workers number / Males / population (Main and marginal) Females Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Dadri Persons 1110093 327863 29.53 65044 5.86 392907 35.39 717186 64.61 Males 601465 269586 44.82 40113 6.67 309699 51.49 291766 48.51 Females 508628 58277 11.46 24931 4.90 83208 16.36 425420 83.64 2 Gautam Buddha Nagar Persons 316790 80782 25.50 22938 7.24 103720 32.74 213070 67.26 Males 169959 66558 39.16 12920 7.60 79478 46.76 90481 53.24 Females 146831 14224 9.69 10018 6.82 24242 16.51 122589 83.49 3 Jewar Persons 221232 49847 22.53 22635 10.23 72482 32.76 148750 67.24 Males 118790 41731 35.13 12476 10.50 54207 45.63 64583 54.37 Females 102442 8116 7.92 10159 9.92 18275 17.84 84167 82.16 District: Gautam Buddha Nagar Persons 1648115 458492 27.82 110617 6.71 569109 34.53 1079006 65.47 Males 890214 377875 42.45 65509 7.36 443384 49.81 446830 50.19 Females 757901 80617 10.64 45108 5.95 125725 16.59 632176 83.41

Table 30 gives the number and percentage of main workers, marginal workers and non-workers by sex at tahsil level in the district as per 2011 Census. The proportion of the total workers works out to 34.53 per cent of the total population in the district. The total workers are comprised of 27.82 per cent of main workers and 6.71 per cent of marginal workers and the remaining 65.47 per cent are non-workers. Among the main workers, male participation rate in the district is 42.45 per cent and 10.64 per cent of females. Male and female marginal workers account for 7.36 and 5.95 per cent respectively. The percentage of female marginal workers is lower than males. Total workers (main and marginal) among tahsils varies from 32.74 per cent in Gautam Buddha Nagar tahsil to 35.39 per cent in Dadri tahsil.

TABLE 31: NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF MAIN WORKERS, MARGINAL WORKERS, AND NON-WORKERS BY SEX IN C. D. BLOCKS, 2011 Serial Name of Persons / Total Main workers Marginal workers Total workers Non workers number C.D. block Males / Population (Main and marginal ) Females Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Bisrakh Persons 137747 31066 22.55 11458 8.32 42524 30.87 95223 69.13 Males 73400 26311 35.85 6953 9.47 33264 45.32 40136 54.68 Females 64347 4755 7.39 4505 7.00 9260 14.39 55087 85.61 2 Dadri Persons 194979 46251 23.72 15776 8.09 62027 31.81 132952 68.19 Males 103362 38147 36.91 9208 8.91 47355 45.81 56007 54.19 Females 91617 8104 8.85 6568 7.17 14672 16.01 76945 83.99 3 Dankaur Persons 184567 43271 23.44 14850 8.05 58121 31.49 126446 68.51 Males 98561 36203 36.73 7686 7.80 43889 44.53 54672 55.47 Females 86006 7068 8.22 7164 8.33 14232 16.55 71774 83.45 4 Jewar Persons 156513 35722 22.82 18279 11.68 54001 34.50 102512 65.50 Males 84282 29109 34.54 9486 11.26 38595 45.79 45687 54.21 Females 72231 6613 9.16 8793 12.17 15406 21.33 56825 78.67 Total Persons 673806 156310 23.20 60363 8.96 216673 32.16 457133 67.84 Males 359605 129770 36.09 33333 9.27 163103 45.36 196502 54.64 Females 314201 26540 8.45 27030 8.60 53570 17.05 260631 82.95 Table 31 shows C.D. block-wise number and percentage of main workers, marginal workers and non-workers for rural population of the district. Of the 673806 total rural population of the district, 23.20 per cent has been categorised as main workers and the marginal workers constitute 8.96 per cent and the remaining 67.84 per cent fall in the category of non-workers. The sex-wise break up at the district level shows that 36.09 per cent males and 8.45 per cent females are in the category of main workers. Male and

44 female marginal workers account for 9.27 and 8.60 per cent respectively. The percentage of total rural workers of the district comes to 32.16 per cent. At the C.D. block level, Jewar C.D block has highest proportion of total workers forming 34.50 per cent of the total population and lowest recorded in 30.87 in Bisrakh CD block.

TABLE 32: NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF MAIN WORKERS, MARGINAL WORKERS, AND NON- WORKERS BY SEX IN URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS / TOWNS, 2011 Serial Name and urban status of UA^ / Persons / Total Main Marginal workers Total workers Non workers number Town +* Males / Population workers (Main and marginal) Females Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Dadri (NPP) Persons 91189 22745 24.94 4306 4.72 27051 29.66 64138 70.34 Males 48856 20474 41.91 2856 5.85 23330 47.75 25526 52.25 Females 42333 2271 5.36 1450 3.43 3721 8.79 38612 91.21 2 Chipyana Buzurg (CT) Persons 17400 4869 27.98 793 4.56 5662 32.54 11738 67.46 Males 9324 4060 43.54 609 6.53 4669 50.08 4655 49.92 Females 8076 809 10.02 184 2.28 993 12.30 7083 87.70 3 Chhapraula (CT) Persons 15154 3911 25.81 902 5.95 4813 31.76 10341 68.24 Males 8214 3476 42.32 587 7.15 4063 49.46 4151 50.54 Females 6940 435 6.27 315 4.54 750 10.81 6190 89.19 4 Patadi (CT) Persons 8479 2514 29.65 174 2.05 2688 31.70 5791 68.30 Males 4565 2135 46.77 116 2.54 2251 49.31 2314 50.69 Females 3914 379 9.68 58 1.48 437 11.17 3477 88.83 5 Noida (CT) Persons 637272 213982 33.58 31526 4.95 245508 38.52 391764 61.48 Males 349397 172989 49.51 19716 5.64 192705 55.15 156692 44.85 Females 287875 40993 14.24 11810 4.10 52803 18.34 235072 81.66 6 Salarpur Khadar (CT) Persons 13600 3736 27.47 875 6.43 4611 33.90 8989 66.10 Males 7410 3011 40.63 488 6.59 3499 47.22 3911 52.78 Females 6190 725 11.71 387 6.25 1112 17.96 5078 82.04 7 Bilaspur (NP) Persons 8980 1891 21.06 530 5.90 2421 26.96 6559 73.04 Males 4695 1744 37.15 409 8.71 2153 45.86 2542 54.14 Females 4285 147 3.43 121 2.82 268 6.25 4017 93.75 8 Dankaur (NP) Persons 13520 2894 21.41 1165 8.62 4059 30.02 9461 69.98 Males 7180 2628 36.60 920 12.81 3548 49.42 3632 50.58 Females 6340 266 4.20 245 3.86 511 8.06 5829 91.94 9 Greater Noida (CT) Persons 102054 31579 30.94 5802 5.69 37381 36.63 64673 63.37 Males 55540 24907 44.85 3334 6.00 28241 50.85 27299 49.15 Females 46514 6672 14.34 2468 5.31 9140 19.65 37374 80.35 10 Kherli Hafizpur (CT) Persons 7932 1822 22.97 791 9.97 2613 32.94 5319 67.06 Males 4204 1493 35.51 467 11.11 1960 46.62 2244 53.38 Females 3728 329 8.83 324 8.69 653 17.52 3075 82.48 11 Rabupura (NP) Persons 15454 3024 19.57 1072 6.94 4096 26.50 11358 73.50 Males 8217 2797 34.04 889 10.82 3686 44.86 4531 55.14 Females 7237 227 3.14 183 2.53 410 5.67 6827 94.33 12 Jahangirpur (NP) Persons 11006 2265 20.58 680 6.18 2945 26.76 8061 73.24 Males 5819 2078 35.71 530 9.11 2608 44.82 3211 55.18 Females 5187 187 3.61 150 2.89 337 6.50 4850 93.50 13 Jewar (NP) Persons 32269 6950 21.54 1638 5.08 8588 26.61 23681 73.39 Males 17188 6313 36.73 1255 7.30 7568 44.03 9620 55.97 Females 15081 637 4.22 383 2.54 1020 6.76 14061 93.24 District(Urban): Gautam Buddha Nagar Persons 974309 302182 31.02 50254 5.16 352436 36.17 621873 63.83 Males 530609 248105 46.76 32176 6.06 280281 52.82 250328 47.18 Females 443700 54077 12.19 18078 4.07 72155 16.26 371545 83.74

45 Table 32 shows number and percentage of main workers, marginal workers and non-workers by sex in urban agglomerations/towns in 2011 Census. In urban areas of the district the proportion of total workers is 36.17 per cent, which comprises of 31.02 per cent main worker and 5.16 per cent marginal workers. The sex wise breakup in urban area shows that 46.76 per cent male and 12.19 per cent females are in category of main workers, proportion of male and female marginal workers accounts to 6.06 percent and 4.07 percent respectively.

TABLE 33: DISTRIBUTION OF WORKERS BY SEX IN FOUR CATEGORIES OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IN TAHSILS, 2011 Serial Name of Tahsil Persons / Total Total Category of workers number Males / Population number of Cultivators Agricultural Household Other Females workers Labourers Industry workers (Main + workers Marginal) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Dadri Persons 1110093 392907 27760 18250 21594 325303 (35.39) (7.07) (4.64) (5.50) (82.79) Males 601465 309699 22037 14028 14874 258760 (51.49) (7.12) (4.53) (4.80) (83.55) Females 508628 83208 5723 4222 6720 66543 (16.36) (6.88) (5.07) (8.08) (79.97) 2 Gautam Buddha Nagar Persons 316790 103720 21926 13573 7896 60325 (32.74) (21.14) (13.09) (7.61) (58.16) Males 169959 79478 17915 9403 3991 48169 (46.76) (22.54) (11.83) (5.02) (60.61) Females 146831 24242 4011 4170 3905 12156 (16.51) (16.55) (17.20) (16.11) (50.14) 3 Jewar Persons 221232 72482 22982 17022 5910 26568 (32.76) (31.71) (23.48) (8.15) (36.65) Males 118790 54207 18851 12067 2913 20376 (45.63) (34.78) (22.26) (5.37) (37.59) Females 102442 18275 4131 4955 2997 6192 (17.84) (22.60) (27.11) (16.40) (33.88) District: Gautam Buddha Nagar Persons 1648115 569109 72668 48845 35400 412196 (34.53) (12.77) (8.58) (6.22) (72.43) Males 890214 443384 58803 35498 21778 327305 (49.81) (13.26) (8.01) (4.91) (73.82) Females 757901 125725 13865 13347 13622 84891 (16.59) (11.03) (10.62) (10.83) (67.52) Note: Percent of Worker to total worker are given in brackets

It can be seen from the Table 33, that the economy of the district is primarily agricultural as supported by the fact that cultivators constitute 12.77 per cent of the total workers ( main + marginal) and remaining 8.58 per cent of total workers are engaged as agricultural labourers, 6.22 per cent, household industry workers and 72.43 other workers in this district. The distribution of workers by four categories of economic activity at tahsil level shows very high dependence of population on agriculture sector absorbing large number of workers. The

46 proportion of cultivators varies between 7.07 per cent in Dadri tahsil and 31.71 per cent in Jewar. These variations within the district may be due to cropping and land holding patterns. The percentage of females cultivators is 11.03 per cent which is lower as compared to 13.26 per cent of male cultivators in the district. The percentage of agricultural labourers and household industry workers is very low in the district as stated above.

TABLE 34 : DISTRIBUTION OF WORKERS BY SEX IN FOUR CATEGORIES OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IN C.D. BLOCKS, 2011 Serial Name of C. D. block Persons / Total Total number Category of workers number Males / population of workers Cultivators Agricultural Household Other Females (Main + Labourers Industry workers Marginal) workers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Bisrakh Persons 137747 42524 8026 4722 3439 26337 (30.87) (18.87) (11.10) (8.09) (61.93) Males 73400 33264 6167 3285 2259 21553 (45.32) (18.54) (9.88) (6.79) (64.79) Females 64347 9260 1859 1437 1180 4784 (14.39) (20.08) (15.52) (12.74) (51.66) 2 Dadri Persons 194979 62027 14318 8039 3959 35711 (31.81) (23.08) (12.96) (6.38) (57.57) Males 103362 47355 11621 6074 2503 27157 (45.81) (24.54) (12.83) (5.29) (57.35) Females 91617 14672 2697 1965 1456 8554 (16.01) (18.38) (13.39) (9.92) (58.30) 3 Dankaur Persons 184567 58121 20988 10412 3652 23069 (31.49) (36.11) (17.91) (6.28) (39.69) Males 98561 43889 16839 6900 1939 18211 (44.53) (38.37) (15.72) (4.42) (41.49) Females 86006 14232 4149 3512 1713 4858 (16.55) (29.15) (24.68) (12.04) (34.13) 4 Jewar Persons 156513 54001 20363 13913 4518 15207 (34.50) (37.71) (25.76) (8.37) (28.16) Males 84282 38595 16810 9569 1792 10424 (45.79) (43.55) (24.79) (4.64) (27.01) Females 72231 15406 3553 4344 2726 4783 (21.33) (23.06) (28.20) (17.69) (31.05) Total Persons 673806 216673 63695 37086 15568 100324 (32.16) (29.40) (17.12) (7.19) (46.30) Males 359605 163103 51437 25828 8493 77345 (45.36) (31.54) (15.84) (5.21) (47.42) Females 314201 53570 12258 11258 7075 22979 (17.05) (22.88) (21.02) (13.21) (42.90) Note: Percent of Worker to total worker are given in brackets

Table 34 presents C.D. block-wise distribution of workers by sex in four categories of economic activity. In the rural areas of the district total workers (main+marginal) are 32.16 per cent of total population. Among these workers, cultivators constitute 29.40 per cent, 17.12 per cent agricultural labourers, 7.19 per cent household industry workers and 46.30 per cent other workers. The other works play a major role in providing employment to the working force of rural population. Household industries also could not make much progress in rural areas as reflected in the data and these household industries

47 employ only 7.19 per cent workers of the total working force. Therefore surplus working force has to depend on primary activities. Among cultivators, the percentage of males (31.54 per cent) is higher than females (22.88 per cent) in the rural areas of the district. The proportion of cultivators and other workers differ considerably from one C.D. block to other. The proportion of cultivators varies between 18.87 per cent in Bisrakh C.D. block to 37.71 per cent in Jewar C.D. block. Similarly for other workers, the lowest proportion is 28.16 per cent in Jewar C.D. block while 61.93 per cent is the highest in Bisrakh C.D. block. The percentage of female agricultural labourers and household industry workers is 21.02 and 13.21 per cent respectively in the district. The percentage of agricultural labourers is highest in Jewar (25.76 per cent) C.D. block and is followed by Dankaur (17.91). Similarly, a household industry worker varies in C.D. blocks between 6.28 per cent in Dankaur and 8.09 per cent in Bisrkh C.D. Block.

TABLE 35 : DISTRIBUTIONOF WORKERS BY SEX IN FOUR CATEGORIES OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY OF URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS/TOWNS,2011 Serial Name and urban status Persons / Total Total number of Category of workers number of UA / Town Males / population workers (Main Cultivators Agricultural Household Other Females + Marginal) Labourers Industry workers workers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Dadri (NPP) Persons 91189 27051 453 694 1847 24057 (29.66) (1.67) (2.57) (6.83) (88.93) Males 48856 23330 392 584 1360 20994 (47.75) (1.68) (2.50) (5.83) (89.99) Females 42333 3721 61 110 487 3063 (8.79) (1.64) (2.96) (13.09) (82.32) 2 Chipyana Buzurg (CT) Persons 17400 5662 158 192 617 4695 (32.54) (2.79) (3.39) (10.90) (82.92) Males 9324 4669 136 166 162 4205 (50.08) (2.91) (3.56) (3.47) (90.06) Females 8076 993 22 26 455 490 (12.30) (2.22) (2.62) (45.82) (49.35) 3 Chhapraula (CT) Persons 15154 4813 58 235 463 4057 (31.76) (1.21) (4.88) (9.62) (84.29) Males 8214 4063 50 199 399 3415 (49.46) (1.23) (4.90) (9.82) (84.05) Females 6940 750 8 36 64 642 (10.81) (1.07) (4.80) (8.53) (85.60) 4 Patadi (CT) Persons 8479 2688 17 55 47 2569 (31.70) (0.63) (2.05) (1.75) (95.57) Males 4565 2251 15 49 38 2149 (49.31) (0.67) (2.18) (1.69) (95.47) Females 3914 437 2 6 9 420 (11.17) (0.46) (1.37) (2.06) (96.11) 5 Noida (CT) Persons 637272 245508 5157 5046 11107 224198 (38.52) (2.10) (2.06) (4.52) (91.32) Males 349397 192705 4035 4056 8070 176544 (55.15) (2.09) (2.10) (4.19) (91.61) Females 287875 52803 1122 990 3037 47654 (18.34) (2.12) (1.87) (5.75) (90.25) 6 Salarpur Khadar (CT) Persons 13600 4611 148 144 176 4143 (33.90) (3.21) (3.12) (3.82) (89.85) Males 7410 3499 122 124 137 3116 (47.22) (3.49) (3.54) (3.92) (89.05) Females 6190 1112 26 20 39 1027 (17.96) (2.34) (1.80) (3.51) (92.36) 7 Bilaspur (NP) Persons 8980 2421 139 270 85 1927 (26.96) (5.74) (11.15) (3.51) (79.60) Males 4695 2153 126 248 81 1698 (45.86) (5.85) (11.52) (3.76) (78.87) Females 4285 268 13 22 4 229 (6.25) (4.85) (8.21) (1.49) (85.45)

48 TABLE 35 Cont….. Serial Name and urban status Persons / Total Total Category of workers number of UA / Town Males / population number of Cultivators Agricultural Household Other Females workers Labourers Industry workers (Main + workers Marginal) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 Dankaur (NP) Persons 13520 4059 69 282 274 3434 (30.02) (1.70) (6.95) (6.75) (84.60) Males 7180 3548 59 241 220 3028 (49.42) (1.66) (6.79) (6.20) (85.34) Females 6340 511 10 41 54 406 (8.06) (1.96) (8.02) (10.57) (79.45) 9 Greater Noida (CT) Persons 102054 37381 1305 1804 3598 30674 (36.63) (3.49) (4.83) (9.63) (82.06) Males 55540 28241 1124 1420 1584 24113 (50.85) (3.98) (5.03) (5.61) (85.38) Females 46514 9140 181 384 2014 6561 (19.65) (1.98) (4.20) (22.04) (71.78) 10 Kherli Hafizpur (CT) Persons 7932 2613 166 382 323 1742 (32.94) (6.35) (14.62) (12.36) (66.67) Males 4204 1960 123 250 142 1445 (46.62) (6.28) (12.76) (7.24) (73.72) Females 3728 653 43 132 181 297 (17.52) (6.58) (20.21) (27.72) (45.48) 11 Rabupura (NP) Persons 15454 4096 431 995 331 2339 (26.50) (10.52) (24.29) (8.08) (57.10) Males 8217 3686 407 835 297 2147 (44.86) (11.04) (22.65) (8.06) (58.25) Females 7237 410 24 160 34 192 (5.67) (5.85) (39.02) (8.29) (46.83) 12 Jahangirpur (NP) Persons 11006 2945 353 599 375 1618 (26.76) (11.99) (20.34) (12.73) (54.94) Males 5819 2608 298 544 324 1442 (44.82) (11.43) (20.86) (12.42) (55.29) Females 5187 337 55 55 51 176 (6.50) (16.32) (16.32) (15.13) (52.23) 13 Jewar (NP) Persons 32269 8588 519 1061 589 6419 (26.61) (6.04) (12.35) (6.86) (74.74) Males 17188 7568 479 954 471 5664 (44.03) (6.33) (12.61) (6.22) (74.84) Females 15081 1020 40 107 118 755 (6.76) (3.92) (10.49) (11.57) (74.02) District (Urban): Gautam Persons 974309 352436 8973 11759 19832 311872 Buddha Nagar (36.17) (2.55) (3.34) (5.63) (88.49) Males 530609 280281 7366 9670 13285 249960 (52.82) (2.63) (3.45) (4.74) (89.18) Females 443700 72155 1607 2089 6547 61912 (16.26) (2.23) (2.90) (9.07) (85.80)

Table 35 presents distribution of workers by sex in four categories of economic activity in urban areas of the district. It can be observed from the table that the four categories of economic activity are cultivators, agricultural labourers, household industry workers and other workers. Figures in the table has been given for total number of workers including main and marginal workers. At the district level, urban areas recorded highest percentage of other workers (88.49), followed by Household Industry with 5.63 per cent (4.74 per cent male and 9.07 per cent female). If we observe each town, the table reveals that highest percentage of cultivators (11.99) is recorded in Jahangirpur (N.P). In the agriculture labourers category Patadi (CT) recorded very low percentage (2.01 percentage).

49 (ix) Brief analysis of the Village Directory and Town Directory data based on inset tables 36 to 45

One of the major parts of the District Census Handbook is Village and Town Directories. These are non-census data incorporated showing educational, medical, drinking water, banking facilities, communication facilities and other such developmental indicators in the towns and villages. From this non-census data certain inset tables have been generated and reproduced below showing major trends in the availability of above amenities.

TABLE 36 : DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES ACCORDING TO AVAILABILITY OF DIFFERENT AMENITIES, 2011 Serial Name of C. D. block Number Type of amenity available Type of amenity available

number of inhabited Education Medical Improved Post Telephone Transport Banks Agricultural Approach Power villages drinking Office communications Credit by pucca supply water* # $ Societies road

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 Bisrakh 52 41 31 49 21 52 25 9 5 39 47 (78.85) (59.62) (94.23) (40.38) (100) (48.08) (17.31) (9.62) (75) (90.38) 2 Dadri 71 67 52 69 17 71 28 6 3 69 69 (94.37) (73.24) (97.18) (23.94) (100) (39.44) (8.45) (4.23) (97.18) (97.18) 3 Dankaur 104 88 23 98 9 ( 104 47 2 2 78 97 (84.62) (22.12) (94.23) (8.65) (100) (45.19) (1.92) (1.92) (75) (93.27) 4 Jewar 77 73 27 77 14 77 27 5 6 49 76 (94.81) (35.06) (100) (18.18) (100) (35.06) (6.49) (7.79) (63.64) (98.7) Total 304 269 133 293 61 304 127 22 16 235 289 (88.49) (43.75) (96.38) (20.07) (100) (41.78) (7.24) (5.26) (77.3) (95.07) Note : - Percentages are given in brackets. * Based on the improved drinking water source, drinking water supply has been classified as `Improved ' or otherwise. If the household has access to drinking water supplied from a tap or a hand pump / tube well situated within or outside the premises it is considered as having access to `Improved drinking water source'. However, the concept of improved drinking water is state specific and this is to be considered accordingly. # Post office includes Post office, telegraph office and Post and telegraph office. $ Transport communication includes bus service, rail facility and navigable waterways.

Table 36 deals with the C.D. block-wise distribution of villages according to the availability of different amenities like educational, medical, improved drinking water, post office, telephone, transport, communications, banks, agricultural credit societies, approach by pucca road and power supply within the village. Out of 304 inhabited villages in the district, 269 villages (88.49 per cent) have been provided with the educational facility of one type or the other. Similarly 133 villages in the district constituting 43.75 per cent have medical facility of one type or the other. Improved drinking water facility is available in 293 (96.38 per cent) villages. As regards, post office facility, which includes facilities like telegraph office and post and telegraph, 61 villages constituting 20.07 per cent of villages have been provided with this facility within the village. 304(100 per cent) villages have been provided with the telephone facility, 127 (41.78 per cent) with transport facility, 22 (7.24 per cent) villages with bank facility and 16 (5.27 per cent) with agricultural credit societies. There are 235 (77.3 per cent) villages which have been linked with the pucca road. Total 289 (95.07 per cent) of villages have been provided with the electricity supply. Almost similar pattern of distribution of villages by availability of amenities in the villages at CD block has been found with slight variation. Jewar CD block has the highest percentage (94.81 percent) of villages where educational facility is available and lowest (78.85 per cent) is found in Bisrakh. Medical facility is highest in Dadri (73.24) and lowest (22.12 per cent) in Dankaur CD block. Telephone facility is available to cent percent villages in all CD blocks. Similarlry remaining availability of different amenities in CD blocks also we can see in above table.

TABLE 37 : NUMBER AND PERCENT OF RURAL POPULATION SERVED BY DIFFERENT AMENITIES, 2011 Serial Name of C. D. block Total Type of amenity available Type of amenity available number population of Education Medical Improved Post Telephone Transport Banks Agricultural Approach Power inhabited drinking Office # communications Credit by pucca supply villages water* $ Societies road

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 Bisrakh 137747 135688 108508 137651 79608 137747 98066 32962 13944 132647 137623 (98.51) (78.77) (99.93) (57.79) (100) (71.19) (23.93) (10.12) (96.3) (99.91) 2 Dadri 194979 194790 165788 194973 90028 194979 107760 42290 12492 192534 194973 (99.9) (85.03) (100) (46.17) (100) (55.27) (21.69) (6.41) (98.75) (100) 3 Dankaur 184567 179306 61237 184418 35843 184567 97826 12271 12271 164576 184387 (97.15) (33.18) (99.92) (19.42) (100) (53) (6.65) (6.65) (89.17) (99.9) 4 Jewar 156513 154593 82535 156513 59770 156513 82355 18331 18999 118965 156469 (98.77) (52.73) (100) (38.19) (100) (52.62) (11.71) (12.14) (76.01) (99.97) Total 673806 664377 418068 673555 265249 673806 386007 105854 57706 608722 673452 (98.6) (62.05) (99.96) (39.37) (100) (57.29) (15.71) (8.56) (90.34) (99.95) Note : - Percentages are given in brackets. * Based on the improved drinking water source, drinking water supply has been classified as `Improved ' or otherwise. If the household has access to drinking water supplied from a tap or a hand pump / tube well situated within or outside the premises it is considered as having access to `Improved drinking water source'. However, the concept of improved drinking water is state specific and this is to be considered accordingly. # Post office includes Post office, telegraph office and Post and telegraph office. $ Transport communication includes bus service, rail facility and navigable waterways.

Table 37 depicts the number and proportion of rural population served by different kinds of amenities. Out of total rural population of 673,806 persons in the district, 664,377 (98.6 per cent) have educational facility of one or the other type. Similarly 418,068 (62.05 per cent) population has medical facilities while almost cent percent have got improved drinking water facility. Post office facilities are available to 265,249 (39.37 per cent) population. Telephone facility is available to 100 per cent polulation. Transport communications facility is available to 386,007 (57.29 per cent) persons. Bank facility is available to 105,854 (15.71 per cent) whereas 57,706 (8.56 per cent) have been provided with the facility of agricultural credit societies. 608,722 (90.34 per cent) have been provided with the facility of approach by pucca road. Power supply is available to 673,452 (99.95 per cent) rural population in the district. Similar pattern of availability of facilities is visible in rural population at C.D. block level.

51 N

ZONE II

COMMERCIAL & POND HOTELS

TEMPLE

60 m WIDE ROAD KABRISTAN Parking

LAMDA-I GREEN 60 m WIDE ROAD WIDE m 60

ISBT + LBT LAMDA-II ZONE I NEW BORAKI RAILWAY STATION

LEGEND DFCC & INDIAN RAILWAY TRACKS DFCC TRACKS ISBT + LBT ENTRY TO BUS PARKING MRTS NEW BORAKI STATION

COMMERCIAL MRTS LINE & RETAIL IRRIGATION CANAL GREEN AREA 105 m WIDE ROAD LAMDA COMMERCIAL AREA AS MRTS LINES PER GNIDA MASTER PLAN 2021 Proposed Road Connectivity to the Freight Village

NOT TO SCALE

Image Source: [For detailed design information and descriptions, see the Project Report for Multi Modal Logistics Hub (MMLH)/ Freight Village and Multi Modal Transport Hub (MMTH) at Greater Noida in Uttar Pradesh under DMIC Project submitted on 12th February 2018 to Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor Development Corporation Limited]