philosophies Article Analogy and Communication Enrique Dussel y Facultad Filosofía y Letras (School of Philosophy and Literature), Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (Autonomous Metropolitan University, UAM), Mexico City 04510, Mexico;
[email protected] See www.enriquedussel.com. y Received: 31 December 2018; Accepted: 17 April 2019; Published: 5 June 2019 Abstract: Analogy makes possible the dialogue between people. This dialogue, at the intercultural level and from distinct ontological comprehensions of life, cannot be achieved from a univocal pretension of meaning. Analogy permits, especially at the rhetoric level of Political Philosophy, an adequate interpretation of such complex concepts as people, state or rights. A semantics of these concepts by similarity allows us to advance in the process towards a better interpretation of the other interlocutor’s expression though never reaching identity. Keywords: analogy; communication; dialogue 1. Introduction Univocal communication is only possible when the meaning of the words or signs that it involves is abstract. In the case of human communication, when a human being communicates with another regarding their ontological, biographical, historical, personal world, the enunciation loses equally and to a greater extent its univocal quality, because the horizon of sense1 (the “comprehension of being” that M. Heidegger referred to, which is not identical to that of other such worlds) gives to each of the entities of the world a distinct sense2 (which is what one seeks to communicate within the context of an existential dialogue between persons), which leads certain philosophers to speak of an inevitable degree of incommunicability, because of the ontological incommensurability of the worlds that constitute the subject of the enunciation at issue.