“A Strange Conclusion to a Triumphant War”: Memory, Identity And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“A Strange Conclusion to a Triumphant War”: Memory, Identity And “A STRANGE CONCLUSION TO A TRIUMPHANT WAR”: MEMORY, IDENTITY AND THE CREATION OF A CONFEDERATE KENTUCKY, 1865- 1925 by ANNE ELIZABETH MARSHALL (Under the Direction of James C. Cobb) ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the development of historical memory in Kentucky after the Civil War between 1865 and 1925. At the outbreak of the war, Kentucky first remained neutral, then joined the Union war effort. After the war, however, white Kentuckians appeared to remember the state’s Civil War role as a Confederate state. They embraced the Democratic politics, racial violence, and Lost Cause all associated with the Confederacy. They built Confederate monuments in greater number than Union ones, and seemed to forget about their Union loyalties. While white Confederate memory dominated the historical landscape of post- war Kentucky on the surface, a closer look reveals and active political and cultural dialogue that included white Unionists, Confederate Kentuckians, as well as the state’s African Americans, who from the last days of the war, drew on Union victory and their part in winning it to lay claim to the fruits of freedom and citizenship. Rather than focussing exclusively on short-term political and economic factors, this dissertation looks at the long-term cultural practices of Kentuckians through which they recalled the Civil War, as well as how and to what end these groups employed their memories of the Civil War in the sixty years following the conflict. INDEX WORDS: Kentucky, Civil War, Confederate identity, African Americans, Reconstruction, historical memory “A STRANGE CONCLUSION TO A TRIUMPHANT WAR”: MEMORY, IDENTITY AND THE CREATION OF A CONFEDERATE KENTUCKY by ANNE ELIZABETH MARSHALL B.A., Centre College, 1998 M.A., University of Georgia, 2000 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2004 © 2004 ANNE ELIZABETH MARSHALL All Rights Reserved “A STRANGE CONCLUSION TO A TRIUMPHANT WAR”: MEMORY, IDENTITY AND THE CREATION OF A CONFEDERATE KENTUCKY by ANNE ELIZABETH MARSHALL Major Professor: James C. Cobb Committee: Kathleen Clark John Inscoe Bryant Simon Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2004 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Though the experience of writing a history dissertation is meant to be a solitary one, mine has been anything but. Since I began to conceive of this project over six years ago, I feel as though I have been in constant conversation with mentors, professors, colleagues, academic observers, history buffs, thinkers, and well-wishers. There are too many to name, but I will try anyway. I wish to thank the archivists who helped me unearth all of scattered information regarding Kentucky’s identity: the staff at repositories around the state, including University of Kentucky Special Collections, Betsy Morelock at Kentucky State University. I would especially like to thank the good folks at Filson Hisorical Society: Mark Wetherington, Jim Holmberg, and Shirley Harmon, who made my Fellowship experience there so productive, rewarding, and just plain enjoyable. I am indebted to several excellent and committed professors at Centre College who originally sparked desire to pursue an academic career: Michael Hamm, Elizabeth Perkins, Clarence Wyatt, and Milton Reigelman. I will always seek to live up to their example Ashley Buren, Isabelle Renot, Jennie Reid Samoska, Gina Strangis Hubbard, Alissa Saufley, and Hannah Saufley O’Leary are great old school friends who have offered unwaivering moral support throughout high school, college, and grad school. My tenure in graduate school has been made utterly bearable by the exceptionally decent, interesting, and group of friends I have made over the years. Rebecca Scales, John Walker Davis, Jennifer Gross Davis, Leslie Miller, Ivy Holliman, Keira Williams, Gil Lenz, Robbie Luckett, Margaret Mockbee, Bruce Stewart, Jennifer Roady-Lawson, Justin Nystrom, Ichiro v Miyata, John Hayes, Judkin Browning, Libby McRae and Mark Huddle have all made a difference in my work and my life. As friends and sage academics, Steve Soper and Susam Rosenbaum offered great meals, companionship, and professional advice. Within the history department, Laurie Kane kept me apprised of deadlines and saved me from my own absentmindedness again and again, and as graduate coordinator, Michael Winship helped me secure financial support throughout my time at Georgia. A group of brilliant and productive scholars in the department made themselves available for consultation and moral support, including Michael Kwass, Laura Mason, John Morrow, Paul Sutter, and Pamela Voekel. I also had the support and the attention of a great committee: Kathleen Clark, John Inscoe, Bryant Simon, and James Cobb. As my dissertation director, Dr. Cobb has always offered, in his own reserved way, his time, his advice, and sophisticated insights. Most of all, in his breadth of knowledge and intellectual sophistication, he has served as a great example of how a scholar can be at once both great and humble. I will always seek and appreciate his guidance. Tammy Ingram has been a great friend who is always good for company, intellectual discourse, and many, many laughs. Alex and Eleanor Macaulay, and their children Eliza and Lee have been the source of great friendship and laughter. Whether in the many lessons about South Carolina history I learned from them, or planning how to spend our imminent shared Georgia Lottery winnings, my friendship with the Macaulays has been one of the best things about my time in graduate school. Bryant Simon and his wife, Ann Marie, and their two children, Benjamin and Eli have become dearest, life-long friends. As a scholar, Bryant has taught me what it means to be a great historian and writer, and most importantly how to care for people from the past, just as he and his family have taught me what it means to care deeply about people around me. vi I am so very lucky to have had a loving and supporting family throughout this long endeavor. My parents-in-law, Barb Giesen and Phil Giesen have offered continual interest and encouragement. My sister, Jennifer, an accountant, has offered moral support and assurance that one day, I too might become “financially solvent.” My parents Jan and Bill Marshall have supported me in more ways than I can count. As historians, librarians, research assistants, proof- readers, and money lenders, they have selflessly given me more assistance than anyone could ever deserve. Most of all, through countless educational “vacation” excursions, which I hated in my youth, they planted an appreciation of and respect for history upon which I continually draw. For this, and because I will be eternally grateful for all they have ever done for me, I dedicate this dissertation to them. That brings me to Jim Giesen. As a fellow historian, best friend, and life partner, he inspires me everyday. Even as I devote my life to uncovering the past, he serves as a constant reminder to appreciate the present. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................iv LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................ix INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1 “A MARKED CHANGE IN THE SENTIMENTS OF THE PEOPLE”: SLAVERY AND CIVIL WAR IN KENTUCKY, 1862-1865 ................................................12 2 “THE REBEL SPIRIT IN KENTUCKY”:THE POLITICS OF READJUSTMENT, 1865-1877...........................................................................................................41 3 “WICKED AND LAWLESS MEN”: VIOLENCE AND CONFEDERATE INDENTITY, 1865-1885 ....................................................................................79 4 “WHAT SHALL BE THE MORAL TO YOUNG KENTUCKIANS?”: CIVIL WAR MEMORIAL ACTIVITY IN THE COMMONWEALTH: 1865-1895”............. 122 5 “TWO KENTUCKIES”: CIVIL WAR IDENTITY IN APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY, 1865-1915.................................................................................. 174 6 “A PLACE FULL OF COLORED PEOPLE, PRETTY GIRLS, AND POLITE MEN”: LITERATURE, CONFEDERATE IDENTITY, AND KENTUCKY’S REPUTATION: 1890-1915............................................................................... 209 7 “A MANIFEST AVERSION TO THE UNION CAUSE”: WAR MEMORY IN KENTUCKY, 1895-1925.................................................................................. 237 viii EPILOGUE ............................................................................................................................ 284 BIBLIOGRAPHY................................................................................................................... 291 ix LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 2.1: Scene from Confedrit X Roads ................................................................................70 Figure 3.1: Watterson Cartoon from Harpers Magazine.......................................................... 110 Figure 6.1: State seal of Kentucky as it was revised by a cartoonist after the Goebel assassination, Minneapolis Journal, February 1, 1900............................................. 212 Figure 6.2: Newspaper Coverage of Night Riders, from Lexington Leader, February 24, 1908 ..................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The George Wright Forum
    The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 34 number 3 • 2017 Society News, Notes & Mail • 243 Announcing the Richard West Sellars Fund for the Forum Jennifer Palmer • 245 Letter from Woodstock Values We Hold Dear Rolf Diamant • 247 Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage Rebecca Conard and John H. Sprinkle, Jr., guest editors Dedication•252 Planned Obsolescence: Maintenance of the National Park Service’s History Infrastructure John H. Sprinkle, Jr. • 254 Shining Light on Civil War Battlefield Preservation and Interpretation: From the “Dark Ages” to the Present at Stones River National Battlefield Angela Sirna • 261 Farming in the Sweet Spot: Integrating Interpretation, Preservation, and Food Production at National Parks Cathy Stanton • 275 The Changing Cape: Using History to Engage Coastal Residents in Community Conversations about Climate Change David Glassberg • 285 Interpreting the Contributions of Chinese Immigrants in Yosemite National Park’s History Yenyen F. Chan • 299 Nānā I Ke Kumu (Look to the Source) M. Melia Lane-Kamahele • 308 A Perilous View Shelton Johnson • 315 (continued) Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage (cont’d) Some Challenges of Preserving and Exhibiting the African American Experience: Reflections on Working with the National Park Service and the Carter G. Woodson Home National Historic Site Pero Gaglo Dagbovie • 323 Exploring American Places with the Discovery Journal: A Guide to Co-Creating Meaningful Interpretation Katie Crawford-Lackey and Barbara Little • 335 Indigenous Cultural Landscapes: A 21st-Century Landscape-scale Conservation and Stewardship Framework Deanna Beacham, Suzanne Copping, John Reynolds, and Carolyn Black • 343 A Framework for Understanding Off-trail Trampling Impacts in Mountain Environments Ross Martin and David R.
    [Show full text]
  • Cutting Patterns in DW Griffith's Biographs
    Cutting patterns in D.W. Griffith’s Biographs: An experimental statistical study Mike Baxter, 16 Lady Bay Road, West Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 5BJ, U.K. (e-mail: [email protected]) 1 Introduction A number of recent studies have examined statistical methods for investigating cutting patterns within films, for the purposes of comparing patterns across films and/or for summarising ‘average’ patterns in a body of films. The present paper investigates how different ideas that have been proposed might be combined to identify subsets of similarly constructed films (i.e. exhibiting comparable cutting structures) within a larger body. The ideas explored are illustrated using a sample of 62 D.W Griffith Biograph one-reelers from the years 1909–1913. Yuri Tsivian has suggested that ‘all films are different as far as their SL struc- tures; yet some are less different than others’. Barry Salt, with specific reference to the question of whether or not Griffith’s Biographs ‘have the same large scale variations in their shot lengths along the length of the film’ says the ‘answer to this is quite clearly, no’. This judgment is based on smooths of the data using seventh degree trendlines and the observation that these ‘are nearly all quite different one from another, and too varied to allow any grouping that could be matched against, say, genre’1. While the basis for Salt’s view is clear Tsivian’s apparently oppos- ing position that some films are ‘less different than others’ seems to me to be a reasonably incontestable sentiment. It depends on how much you are prepared to simplify structure by smoothing in order to effect comparisons.
    [Show full text]
  • The George Wright
    THE GEORGE WRIGHT FORUvolume 23 Mnumber 1 * 2006 The ICOMOS-Ename Charter for Cultural Heritage Interpretation Origins Founded in 1980. the George Wright Society is organized for the pur­ poses of promoting the application of knowledge, fostering communica­ tion, improving resource management, and providing information to improve public understanding and appreciation of the basic purposes of natural and cultural parks and equivalent reserves. The Society is dedicat­ ed to the protection, preservation, and management of cultural and natu­ ral parks and reserves through research and education. Mission The George Wright Society advances the scientific and heritage values of parks and protected areas. The Society promotes professional research and resource stewardship across natural and cultural disciplines, provides avenues of communication, and encourages public policies that embrace these values. Our Goal The Society strives to be the premier organization connecting people, places, knowledge, and ideas to foster excellence in natural and cultural resource management, research, protection, and interpretation in parks and equivalent reserves. Board of Directors DwiGHT T. PlTCMTHLEY, President • Las Cruces, New Mexico ABIGAIL B. MILLER, Vice President • Shelhurne, Vermont JERRY EMORY, Treasurer • Mill Valley, California GILLIAN BOWSER, Secretary • Bryan, Texas REBECCA CONARD • Murfreesboro, Tennessee ROLF DiAMANT • Woodstock, Vermont SUZANNE LEWIS • Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming DAVID J. PARSONS • Florence, Montana STEPHANIE TOOTHMAN • Seattle, Washington WILLIAM H. WALKER,JR. • Herndon, Virginia STEPHEN WOODLEY • Chelsea, Quebec Executive Office DAVID HARMON, Executive Director EMILY DEKKER-FIALA, Conference Coordinator P. O. Box 65 • Hancock, Michigan 49930-0065 USA 1-906-487-9722 • fax 1-906-487-9405 [email protected] • www.georgewright.org The George Wright Society is a member of US/ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites—U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cincinnati
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:_December 13, 2006_ I, James Michael Rhyne______________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Doctor of Philosophy in: History It is entitled: Rehearsal for Redemption: The Politics of Post-Emancipation Violence in Kentucky’s Bluegrass Region This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _Wayne K. Durrill_____________ _Christopher Phillips_________ _Wendy Kline__________________ _Linda Przybyszewski__________ Rehearsal for Redemption: The Politics of Post-Emancipation Violence in Kentucky’s Bluegrass Region A Dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in the Department of History of the College of Arts and Sciences 2006 By James Michael Rhyne M.A., Western Carolina University, 1997 M-Div., Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, 1989 B.A., Wake Forest University, 1982 Committee Chair: Professor Wayne K. Durrill Abstract Rehearsal for Redemption: The Politics of Post-Emancipation Violence in Kentucky’s Bluegrass Region By James Michael Rhyne In the late antebellum period, changing economic and social realities fostered conflicts among Kentuckians as tension built over a number of issues, especially the future of slavery. Local clashes matured into widespread, violent confrontations during the Civil War, as an ugly guerrilla war raged through much of the state. Additionally, African Americans engaged in a wartime contest over the meaning of freedom. Nowhere were these interconnected conflicts more clearly evidenced than in the Bluegrass Region. Though Kentucky had never seceded, the Freedmen’s Bureau established a branch in the Commonwealth after the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Bibliography from the Register of the Kentucky Historical Society
    SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY FROM THE REGISTER OF THE KENTUCKY HISTORICAL SOCIETY War of 1812 Adams, Evelyn Grady. “The Imprisonment of British Officers in the Frankfort Penitentiary during the War of 1812.” 49 (1951): 231-33. Bolt, Robert, “Vice President Richard M. Johnson of Kentucky: Hero of the Thames–Or the Great Amalgamator.” 75 (1977): 191-203. Analysis of a major military and political figure who broke the conventions of race and family. Clift, G. Glen, ed. “War of 1812 Diary of William B. Northcutt.” 56 (1958):165-81, 253-70, 325- 44. “Correspondence between Governor Isaac Shelby and General William Henry Harrison during the War of 1812.” 20 (1922): 130-44. Eubank, James Taylor. “The Siege of Fort Meigs.”19 (1921): 54-62. Dated but representative interpretation of a major militia operation. Fredriksen, John C., ed. “Kentucky at the Thames, 1813: A Rediscovered Narrative by William Greathouse.” 83 (1985): 93-107. New insights on an influential battle. Hall, Ellery L. “Canadian Annexation Sentiment in Kentucky Prior to the War of 1812.” 28 (1930): 372-80. Perspective on a major Kentucky motive for war. Harris, James Russell. “Kentuckians in the War of 1812; A Note on Numbers, Losses, and Sources.” 82 (1984): 277-86. Analysis of the traditionally large numbers cited for Kentuckians in service and killed in action which finds them undocumented and questionable. Hay, Robert Pettus. “A Jubilee for Freeman: The Fourth of July in Frontier Kentucky, 1788- 1816.” 64 (1966): 169-95. Hickey, Donald R., ed. “A Dissenting Voice: Matthew Lyon on the Conquest of Canada.” 76 (1978): 45-52.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission on Public Art Inventory Review Online Comment Submissions the Public Comments in This Document Were Collected from Au
    Commission on Public Art inventory review online comment submissions The public comments in this document were collected from August 15 to September 5. They are in response to a call from Mayor Greg Fischer, encouraging the public to add their voice to the review of public art that can be interpreted to honor bigotry, discrimination, racism and/or slavery. 40204: I am not opposed to removing the Castleman statue. I would miss having a horse in the neighborhood, however, so if it could be replaced by another rider, perhaps Oliver Lewis and Aristides, the first KY Derby winners. That would be cool. Any statue with Confederate imagery should be removed. Period. 40299: We should not have public murals and statues of leaders of the confederacy. The bottom line is that these men of the confederacy fought to keep hatred, bigotry and racism alive. I don't want our city to have statues honoring these men, because I know Louisville is an inclusive community dedicated to bringing different folks together. 40212: Remove all statues glorifying these traitors. I can’t imagine what a PoC feels about these abominations. 40243: Please leave history ALONE... 40208: A democracy should have monuments celebrating the oppressed and not the oppressors. We need to tear down any monuments celebrating the Confederacy. I also think you should add to this list nude portraits, paintings objectifying women, and paintings featuring people in poverty. I would recommend going through the library and removing all books before 1975 and blocking all websites that involve actual thinking. History has been written, to ignore it is unwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    Book Reviews Henry Watterson: Reconstructed Rebel. By Joseph Frazier Wall. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956. Pp. xvi, 337. Notes and index. $6.00.) One of the last two ferries to shuttle the Ohio between Louisville, Kentucky, and Jeffersonville, Indiana, was the “Henry Watterson”--so named, in the words of its co-owner, “because both were symbols in the effort to unite the North and the South.” Appropriately, the bottle of water that launched this boat was a blend from wells on both sides of the dividing line-from Mansfield, “Marse Henry’s” estate, and from Captain James E. Howard’s mansion near Jeffer- sonville, whence three generations of Howards also had helped link the North and South by building over four hun- dred steamboats. This biography of the legendary editor of the Louisville Courier-Joumdwhich for fifty-three years (1868-1921) served as a diary of this reconstructed rebel’s struggle to reconciliate first the North and the South, and then the Democratic party-should be of particular interest to Hoosiers. As Irvin S. Cobb reminded us a generation ago in a “guyed book” to Indiana, “There is a good deal of the Southerner in the composition of the typical Hoosier.” To this day, some profess that a more realistic Mason-Dixon Line (than its projection down the Ohio) slices Indiana along an approximation of U.S. Route 40. Certainly, during the Civil War, in the Copperhead country of Indiana below the Na- tional Road, countless Hoosiers would have understood why young Watterson’s loyalty to the South outweighed his love for the Union and his hatred of slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Revolutionary War Soldiers Buried in Kentucky
    Vol. 41, No. 2 Winter 2005 kentucky ancestors genealogical quarterly of the Perryville Casualty Pink Things: Some Revolutionary Database Reveals A Memoir of the War Soldiers Buried True Cost of War Edwards Family of in Kentucky Harrodsburg Vol. 41, No. 2 Winter 2005 kentucky ancestors genealogical quarterly of the Thomas E. Stephens, Editor kentucky ancestors Dan Bundy, Graphic Design Kent Whitworth, Director James E. Wallace, Assistant Director administration Betty Fugate, Membership Coordinator research and interpretation Nelson L. Dawson, Team Leader management team Kenneth H. Williams, Program Leader Doug Stern, Walter Baker, Lisbon Hardy, Michael Harreld, Lois Mateus, Dr. Thomas D. Clark, C. Michael Davenport, Ted Harris, Ann Maenza, Bud Pogue, Mike Duncan, James E. Wallace, Maj. board of Gen. Verna Fairchild, Mary Helen Miller, Ryan trustees Harris, and Raoul Cunningham Kentucky Ancestors (ISSN-0023-0103) is published quarterly by the Kentucky Historical Society and is distributed free to Society members. Periodical postage paid at Frankfort, Kentucky, and at additional mailing offices. Postmas- ter: Send address changes to Kentucky Ancestors, Kentucky Historical Society, 100 West Broadway, Frankfort, KY 40601-1931. Please direct changes of address and other notices concerning membership or mailings to the Membership De- partment, Kentucky Historical Society, 100 West Broadway, Frankfort, KY 40601-1931; telephone (502) 564-1792. Submissions and correspondence should be directed to: Tom Stephens, editor, Kentucky Ancestors, Kentucky Histori- cal Society, 100 West Broadway, Frankfort, KY 40601-1931. The Kentucky Historical Society, an agency of the Commerce Cabinet, does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or disability, and provides, on request, reasonable accommodations, includ- ing auxiliary aids and services necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in all services, programs, and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Political History History 1987 Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963 John Ed Pearce Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Pearce, John Ed, "Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963" (1987). Political History. 3. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_history/3 Divide and Dissent This page intentionally left blank DIVIDE AND DISSENT KENTUCKY POLITICS 1930-1963 JOHN ED PEARCE THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright © 1987 by The University Press of Kentucky Paperback edition 2006 The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University,Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales Qffices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pearce,John Ed. Divide and dissent. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Kentucky-Politics and government-1865-1950.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Kentucky Basketball Syllabus
    History of Kentucky Basketball Syllabus Instructor J. Scott Course Overview Covers the history of the University of Kentucky Men’s basketball program, from its Phone inception to the modern day. This includes important coaches, players, teams and games, [Telephone] which helped to create and sustain the winning Wildcat tradition. The course will consist of in-class lectures, including by guest speakers, videos, and short Email field trips. The class will meet once a week for two hours. [Email Address] Required Text Office Location None [Building, Room] Suggested Reading Office Hours Before Big Blue, Gregory Kent Stanley [Hours, Big Blue Machine, Russell Rice Days] The Rupp Years, Tev Laudeman The Winning Tradition, Nelli & Nelli Basketball The Dream Game in Kentucky, Dave Kindred Course Materials Course materials will be provided in class, in conjunction with lectures & videos. Each student will receive a copy of the current men’s basketball UK Media Guide Resources Available online and within the UK library ! UK Archives (M.I. King Library, 2nd Floor) ! William T. Young Library ! University of Kentucky Athletics website archives: http://www.ukathletics.com/sports/m- baskbl/archive/kty-m-baskbl-archive.html ! Big Blue History Statistics website: http://www.bigbluehistory.net/bb/Statistics/statistics.html Fall Semester Page 1 Course Schedule Week Subject Homework 1 Course Structure & Requirements (15 min.) Introductory Remarks – The List (15 min.) Video: The Sixth Man (90 min.) 2 Lecture: Kentucky’s 8 National Championship Teams Take home
    [Show full text]
  • African Americans and the Civil War Source Set Teaching Guide
    TEACHING WITH PRIMARY SOURCES African Americans and the Civil War How should the African-American story of the Civil War be told? While slavery was the major issue separating the North and South, it was not slavery itself that sparked the conflict. The South wanted to secede from the Union, and the North refused. While President Abraham Lincoln personally opposed slavery, he recognized that it was legal under the U.S. Constitution at the time. He also recognized that few in the North were ready to go to war to free the slaves. For Lincoln and the northern majority, preservation of the Union was the foremost goal. Freed Slaves during the Civil War The “Negro question,” as it was called, became an important issue early in the conflict. Most slaves were in fact “liberated” when the Union Army eliminated the local southern forces that kept them in slavery. They simply left their plantations to seek their freedom under the protection of northern military units. Union commanders had to decide how to deal with them. Early in the fighting in border states, slaves were sometimes returned to their masters in the hope of encouraging support for the Union. However, as more and more slaves walked to freedom, the army made provisions to use them as a resource. The army hired many to work in non-military roles — cooks, wagon drivers, blacksmiths, laundresses — but until later in the conflict, racial prejudice prevented arming former slaves and allowing to fight. As the war progressed, however, African Americans could sign up for combat units.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]