How Generous Is Australia's Refugee Program Compared to Other

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Generous Is Australia's Refugee Program Compared to Other AN ANALYSIS OF UNHCR’S 2018 GLOBAL REFUGEE STATISTICS HOW GENEROUS IS AUSTRALIA’S REFUGEE PROGRAM COMPARED TO OTHER COUNTRIES? Australian political leaders regularly claim that Australia has one of the most generous refugee responses in the world. But what do UNHCR’s official statistics for 2018 tell us? In its 2018 Global Trends report, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) reported that the world’s refugee population had reached 25.9 million by the end of December 2018 and that another 3.5 million were seeking asylum. Of these, 5.5 million refugees are Palestinians recognised under the mandate of the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) and 20.4 million are refugees under UNHCR’s mandate. Source countries for refugees The largest numbers of refugees are from Syria (6.65 million), Afghanistan (2.68 million), South Sudan (2.29 million), Myanmar (1.15 million) and Somalia (950,000). In 2018, the largest increases in refugee populations were from Syria (343,850), Democratic Republic of Congo (99,500), Afghanistan (57,230), Central African Republic (45,350) and Nigeria (37,850). The number of people seeking asylum globally grew by 412,400, with much of this increase resulting from the crisis in Venezuela. In just 12 months, the number of Venezuelans seeking asylum grew by 316,250 to 464,230. OfficiAl refugee populAtion The five countries hosting the largest number of refugees as at 31 December 2018, according to UNHCR, were Turkey (3.68 million), Pakistan (1.40 million), Uganda (1.17 million), Sudan (1.08 million) and Germany (1.07 million). By comparison, Australia’s official refugee population was 56,933 – 45th overall, 50th per capita and 88th relative to national Gross Domestic Product (GDP). These refugee population figures tell only part of the story. They exclude refugees who have been resettled but, in Australia’s case, they include those who have been given permanent protection onshore over the past 10 years and refugees on temporary protection visas. As UNHCR statistics focus on identifying people for whom the agency has a particular responsibility under its mandate, these refugee population figures favour nations in which large numbers of refugees remain in unresolved and protracted situations and give less weight to the contribution of nations offering permanent protection and resettlement. Refugee resettlement Many of the outlandish political claims within Australia focus solely on refugee resettlement, despite the fact that so few refugees get access to resettlement. In 2018, just 92,424 refugees were resettled from one country to another, less than 0.4% of the total refugee population. Australia’s resettlement of 12,706 refugees during the 2018 calendar year saw the country ranked third overall for Sydney office: Melbourne office: Suite 4A6, 410 Elizabeth Street Suite 601, 580 Collins Street Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia Phone: +61 (02) 9211 9333 ● Fax: (02) 9211 9288 Phone: +61 (03) 9600 3302 [email protected] [email protected] Web: www.refugeecouncil.org.au ●Twitter: @OzRefugeeCounc Incorporated in ACT ● ABN 87 956 673 083 resettlement (behind Canada and USA) – second per capita and relative to national GDP (behind Canada). Recognition of refugees through asylum processes During 2018, 1.56 million people who sought asylum were recognised as refugees, through group recognition of refugees arriving in larger numbers, individual assessment of asylum claims or through granting temporary protection. The nations in which the largest numbers of refugees were newly recognised in 2018 were Turkey (402,550), Sudan (190,290), Uganda (180,660), Germany (105,540) and Cameroon (55,320). Australia recognised 10,300 refugees in 2018, most of them given temporary protection visas. In global terms, Australia was ranked 29th for recognition of refugees in 2018 – 30th per capita and 60th relative to GDP. AustrAliA’s contribution through Asylum And resettlement processes The most accurate reflection of Australia’s contribution can be found by combining the numbers of given protection for the first time through an asylum or recognition process or given further protection through resettlement. In 2018, 1.65 million people had their refugee status recognised or were resettled. By this measure, Australia recognised or resettled 23,002 refugees in 2018 (1.39% of the global total), being ranked 14th overall, 20th per capita and 60th relative to national GDP. As numbers vary considerably across different countries from year to year, it is more useful to look at these statistics over a 10-year period. Between January 2009 and December 2018, Australia recognised or resettled 180,790 refugees. This represented 0.89% of the 20.3 million refugees recognised globally over that period. Australia’s total contribution for the decade is ranked 25th overall, 29th per capita and 54th relative to national GDP. Table 1: Australia in global refugee statistics, 2018 To Australian Australia’s Overall Per Global total total total share rank capita GDP Asylum seekers recognised as refugees, 2018 1,560,689 10,926 0.70% 29 30 60 Refugees resettled from other countries, 2018 92,424 12,706 13.75% 3 2 2 Refugees recognised or resettled, 2018 1,653,113 23,002 1.39% 14 20 60 Refugees recognised or resettled, 2009 to 2018 20,301,094 180,788 0.89% 25 29 54 Asylum applications received in 2018 1,680,628 28,839 1.72% 18 36 77 Asylum applications pending, 31 December 2018 3,503,284 60,645 1.73% 13 21 61 Refugees under UNHCR mandate 20,360,562 56,933 0.28% 45 50 88 Table 1 has been drawn from the spreadsheets published by UNHCR with its 2018 Global Trends report, with the figures since 2009 drawn from previous years’ reports. The key statistics – refugees recognised and resettled over the past decade – are highlighted in bold. The tables which follow provide more detail about refugee numbers by countries of origin and asylum, changes in refugee populations, numbers of asylum claims and some key resettlement statistics. Table 2: Refugees recognised in 2018, by country of asylum Granted Total Group Individual Per 1000 Per $b Country of asylum temporary recognised Rank Rank Rank recognition recognition popn GDP protection as refugees Turkey - 397,611 4,941 402,552 1 4.914 1 524.84 13 Sudan 186,536 - 3,754 190,290 2 4.585 2 5613.27 2 Uganda 160,646 - 20,013 180,659 3 4.081 4 6429.15 1 Germany - - 105,544 105,544 4 1.283 14 26.79 37 Cameroon 52,766 - 2,552 55,318 5 2.241 5 1436.83 7 Greece - 31,600 15,460 47,060 6 4.227 3 214.40 21 France - - 46,952 46,952 7 0.720 19 16.57 42 Ethiopia 42,129 - 5 42,134 8 0.392 34 524.71 14 United States - - 35,198 35,198 9 0.108 52 2.25 90 Nigeria 32,601 - 223 32,824 10 0.170 44 85.04 24 Italy - - 30,660 30,660 11 0.517 24 14.58 46 Kenya 7,276 - 16,579 23,855 12 0.468 26 267.43 20 Chad 22,049 - 397 22,446 13 1.462 12 2059.27 5 Malaysia - - 21,124 21,124 14 0.660 21 59.20 28 South Sudan 19,581 - 61 19,642 15 1.520 10 5036.41 3 Austria - - 18,887 18,887 16 2.158 6 41.07 35 Canada - - 16,875 16,875 17 0.457 28 10.35 51 Bangladesh - 16,252 - 16,252 18 0.098 54 56.47 30 DR Congo 15,968 - 73 16,041 19 0.191 42 376.55 16 Iraq 15,609 - 36 15,645 20 0.397 32 69.10 26 Jordan 13,323 - 1,616 14,939 21 1.509 11 352.33 17 Switzerland - - 14,926 14,926 22 1.747 8 21.52 40 United Kingdom - - 14,478 14,478 23 0.217 40 4.57 67 Egypt 5 5,288 8,880 14,173 24 0.142 48 56.87 29 Niger 2,924 8,838 1,587 13,349 25 0.598 23 1450.98 6 Zambia - - 12,385 12,385 26 0.703 20 491.47 15 Sweden - - 11,355 11,355 27 1.138 15 20.59 41 Burundi - - 10,697 10,697 28 0.954 18 3146.18 4 Australia - - 10,296 10,296 29 0.416 30 7.23 60 Mali - - 9,481 9,481 30 0.497 25 551.22 12 Rwanda 8,157 - 39 8,196 31 0.656 22 862.74 10 Mauritania 5,900 - 153 6,053 32 1.333 13 1164.04 8 Russian Federation - - 6,043 6,043 33 0.042 72 3.90 72 Mexico - - 5,921 5,921 34 0.047 71 3.58 75 Yemen 4,873 153 255 5,281 35 0.183 43 196.32 23 Belgium - - 5,045 5,045 36 0.439 29 9.57 54 Malawi - - 4,795 4,795 37 0.250 38 694.93 11 Ecuador - - 4,757 4,757 38 0.282 36 44.05 33 Afghanistan 3,937 - 2 3,939 39 0.109 51 200.97 22 Netherlands - - 3,653 3,653 40 0.214 41 3.95 71 Spain - - 3,173 3,173 41 0.068 61 1.55 95 Somalia 2,034 - 459 2,493 42 0.164 45 332.40 18 Finland - - 2,282 2,282 43 0.411 31 8.19 58 Djibouti 1,903 - - 1,903 44 1.958 7 865.00 9 India - - 1,728 1,728 45 0.001 132 0.62 113 Denmark - - 1,621 1,621 46 0.282 37 4.43 68 Norway - - 1,522 1,522 47 0.284 35 3.47 78 Indonesia - - 1,508 1,508 48 0.006 115 1.40 97 Morocco - 1,084 401 1,485 49 0.040 73 12.50 47 Cyprus - - 1,214 1,214 50 1.021 17 49.55 31 Other countries (100) 1,110 388 20,542 22,040 Total 599,327 461,214 500,148 1,560,689 Source: UNHCR 2018 Global Trends, data table 3 Table 3: Refugees resettled in 2018, by receiving country Country of resettlement Resettlement arrivals Rank Per 1000 popn Rank Per $b GDP Rank Canada 28,076 1 0.760 1 17.22 1 United States of America 22,938 2 0.070 14 1.46 14 Australia 12,706 3 0.513 2 8.93 2 United Kingdom 5,806 4 0.087 9 1.83 9 France 5,560 5 0.085 10 1.96 10 Sweden 4,935 6 0.494 3 8.95 3 Germany 3,217 7 0.039 15 0.82 15 Norway 2,484 8 0.464 4 5.66 4 Netherlands 1,227 9 0.072 12 1.33 12 Switzerland 1,079 10 0.126 7 1.56 7 New Zealand 1,004 11 0.212 5 6.42 5 Belgium 880 12 0.077 11 1.67 11 Spain 830 13 0.018 17 0.41 17 Finland 606 14 0.109 8 2.17 8 Italy 400 15 0.007 20 0.19 20 Ireland 338 16 0.071 13 1.12 13 Croatia 110 17 0.027 16 1.40 16 Iceland 53 18 0.157 6 1.85 6 Portugal 35 19 0.003 22 0.16 22 Slovenia 34 20 0.016 18 0.45 18
Recommended publications
  • Partnership Fact Sheet
    PARTNERSHIP FACT SHEET PORTMORE, JAMAICA + TOWNSVILLE, AUSTRALIA LOCATED IN THE ATLANTIC HURRICANE BELT, Portmore, Jamaica is extremely susceptible to hurricanes that RESULTS can cause severe flooding and widespread infrastructure damage. Portmore is a low-lying area on the southern coast of Jamaica. 1 Originally a predominantly agricultural area, the city transformed into a large residential community in the 1950s and became home Based off of a collective social learning for thousands of residents who worked in Kingston. Since then, workshop model from Townsville, the the population of Portmore has grown extremely rapidly, leading partnership hosted a workshop for 46 key it to become the largest residential area in the Caribbean. stakeholders from local government, civil society, and the national government in One of the greatest climate related risks to Portmore is the Portmore to prioritize climate actions that will potential impacts from tropical storms, storm surges and sea feed into Portmore’s Climate Action Plan. level rise. The coastal location of the city also renders it highly susceptible to incremental changes in sea levels and the potential 2 for inundation that will only worsen with future seal level rise. Portmore adopted climate education initiatives from Townsville that will work with students Recognizing that the city’s flood risk is increasing with the threat from elementary to high school on the of climate change, Portmore applied to be part of the CityLinks creation of sensors to monitor indoor energy partnership in the hopes of receiving technical assistance to better consumption and indoor temperatures. plan for future climate impacts. 3 After seeing the impacts white roofs had PARTNERING ON SHARED CLIMATE CHALLENGES in Townsville, Portmore is considering the Although, the distance between Townsville and Portmore design of municipal pilot projects that would couldn’t be greater, local government structure and shared encourage white roofs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret History of Australia's Nuclear Ambitions
    Jim Walsh SURPRISE DOWN UNDER: THE SECRET HISTORY OF AUSTRALIAS NUCLEAR AMBITIONS by Jim Walsh Jim Walsh is a visiting scholar at the Center for Global Security Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He is also a Ph.D. candidate in the Political Science program at MIT, where he is completing a dissertation analyzing comparative nuclear decisionmaking in Australia, the Middle East, and Europe. ustralia is widely considered tactical nuclear weapons. In 1961, of state behavior and the kinds of Ato be a world leader in ef- Australia proposed a secret agree- policies that are most likely to retard forts to halt and reverse the ment for the transfer of British the spread of nuclear weapons? 1 spread of nuclear weapons. The nuclear weapons, and, throughout This article attempts to answer Australian government created the the 1960s, Australia took actions in- some of these questions by examin- Canberra Commission, which called tended to keep its nuclear options ing two phases in Australian nuclear for the progressive abolition of open. It was not until 1973, when history: 1) the attempted procure- nuclear weapons. It led the fight at Australia ratified the NPT, that the ment phase (1956-1963); and 2) the the U.N. General Assembly to save country finally renounced the acqui- indigenous capability phase (1964- the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty sition of nuclear weapons. 1972). The historical reconstruction (CTBT), and the year before, played Over the course of four decades, of these events is made possible, in a major role in efforts to extend the Australia has gone from a country part, by newly released materials Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of that once sought nuclear weapons to from the Australian National Archive Nuclear Weapons (NPT) indefi- one that now supports their abolition.
    [Show full text]
  • UF in North Queensland, Australia: Sustaining Humans and the Environment Summer A, 2021 Itinerary Highlights
    UF in North Queensland, Australia: Sustaining Humans and the Environment Summer A, 2021 Itinerary Highlights Day 1 – 6 Magnetic Island amazing 305 meters into the Stony Creek Gorge and learn about the management plan. Bungalow Bay Koala Village During your stay at Bungalow Bay Koala Village you will learn about their role in conservation on the island. You will receive lectures from their rangers, visit their wildlife sanctuary, and hike through diverse habitats that are home to over 75 species of reptiles, mammals, and birds. Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AWC) AWC's reserves cover more than 7.4 million acres, including the critical conservation of Mt Zero and Taravale. Spend the day working on a range of service-learning activities, such as bush fire control methods of clearing brush, or business assessment and monitoring. Koala population study and beach scrub project Day 10 – 12 Mission Beach to Atherton You will participate in a field-based study surveying the local koala population while enjoying them in the wild, and Aboriginal cultural experience a project on beach scrub, learning about Conservation Learn about Nywaigi Aboriginal culture and hear the Action Planning, how to use camera traps, and conducting stories of their ancestors who were exhibited as cannibals fauna surveys. and savages in nineteenth century circuses in Europe and the US. Try your hand at traditional activities such as throwing boomerangs and spears and take part in a Day 7 – 9 Hidden Valley service-learning project on the Mungalla wetlands. Hidden Valley Cabins ecotourism Stay at a family-run ecotourism business with hosts that are passionate about the natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • KENYA Public Disclosure Authorized
    RESTRICTED Report No. AF-26a FILE COPY This report was prepared for use within the Bank and its affiliated organizations. Public Disclosure Authorized They do not accept responsibility for its accuracy or completeness. The report may not be published nor may it be quoted as representing their views. INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION Public Disclosure Authorized THE ECONOMY OF KENYA Public Disclosure Authorized July 10, 1964 Public Disclosure Authorized Department of Operations Africa CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS 100 EA cents = 1 EA shilling = U.S. $0. 14 20 EA shillings = L 1 sterling = U. S. $2. 80 6 1 million sterling = U. S. $2. 8 million U.S. $1 = 7. 15 EA shillings U.S. $1 million = L 357, 143 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page IIaps Charts Basic Data Suanary I. BACKGROUND . .. a 1 Country and People . .. .. .. .. .... 1 Constitutional and Political Developments . 2 II. THE EC ONOMY . a o. o. * 5 Structure and Growth . Agriculture . .. 6 Forestry . Q . .. .o . 11 Tourism and Wildlife . .. 12 YMining and Manufacturing . 12 Construction . 13 Electricity and Water ....... 13 Transportation . 13 Government Services . .. ..... 14 Foreign Trade and Payments *. .* . * .. 15 Capital Formation 0 . 0 . 17 Employment, Earnings and Prices . ... ... , . 18 Money and Credit a . C . 0 a a. - 19 Public Finances . ., a . 21 III. THE DEVELOPMEN4T PLAN . 23 IV. PROSPECTS AND CONCLUSIONS . ........ 26 STATISTICAL APPENDIX Li /- c a i: rr i4- æ r> KENYA AGRICULTURAL AREAS AND TRANSPORT C 5 ------. 4 E T H 1 O P l A.... .: S O M A L l A HoR T H E TE R H u G Au D A o" EA 5 T E R N To, ir O A s T a avar-....r...øso e.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauritius's Constitution of 1968 with Amendments Through 2016
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 constituteproject.org Mauritius's Constitution of 1968 with Amendments through 2016 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 Table of contents CHAPTER I: THE STATE AND THE CONSTITUTION . 7 1. The State . 7 2. Constitution is supreme law . 7 CHAPTER II: PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF THE INDIVIDUAL . 7 3. Fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual . 7 4. Protection of right to life . 7 5. Protection of right to personal liberty . 8 6. Protection from slavery and forced labour . 10 7. Protection from inhuman treatment . 11 8. Protection from deprivation of property . 11 9. Protection for privacy of home and other property . 14 10. Provisions to secure protection of law . 15 11. Protection of freedom of conscience . 17 12. Protection of freedom of expression . 17 13. Protection of freedom of assembly and association . 18 14. Protection of freedom to establish schools . 18 15. Protection of freedom of movement . 19 16. Protection from discrimination . 20 17. Enforcement of protective provisions . 21 17A. Payment or retiring allowances to Members . 22 18. Derogations from fundamental rights and freedoms under emergency powers . 22 19. Interpretation and savings . 23 CHAPTER III: CITIZENSHIP . 25 20. Persons who became citizens on 12 March 1968 . 25 21. Persons entitled to be registered as citizens . 25 22. Persons born in Mauritius after 11 March 1968 . 26 23. Persons born outside Mauritius after 11 March 1968 .
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Political System
    Australia’s Political System Australia's Political System Australia's system of government is based on the liberal democratic tradition, which includes religious tolerance and freedom of speech and association. It's institutions and practices reflect British and North American models but are uniquely Australian. The Commonwealth of Australia was created on January 1, 1901 - Federation Day - when six former British colonies - now the six States of Australia - agreed to form a union. The Australian Constitution, which took effect on January 1, 1901, lays down the framework for the Australian system of government. The Constitution The Australian Constitution sets out the rules and responsibilities of government and outlines the powers of its three branches - legislative, executive and judicial. The legislative branch of government contains the parliament - the body with the legislative power to make laws. The executive branch of government administers the laws made by the legislative branch, and the judicial branch of government allows for the establishment of the country's courts of law and the appointment and removal of it judges. The purpose of the courts is to interpret all laws, including the Constitution, making the rule of law supreme. The Constitution can only be changed by referendum. Australia's Constitutional Monarchy Australia is known as a constitutional monarchy. This means it is a country that has a queen or king as its head of state whose powers are limited by a Constitution. Australia's head of state is Queen Elizabeth II. Although she is also Queen of the United Kingdom, the two positions now are quite separate, both in law and constitutional practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonialism and Economic Development in Africa
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES COLONIALISM AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA Leander Heldring James A. Robinson Working Paper 18566 http://www.nber.org/papers/w18566 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 November 2012 We are grateful to Jan Vansina for his suggestions and advice. We have also benefitted greatly from many discussions with Daron Acemoglu, Robert Bates, Philip Osafo-Kwaako, Jon Weigel and Neil Parsons on the topic of this research. Finally, we thank Johannes Fedderke, Ewout Frankema and Pim de Zwart for generously providing us with their data. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2012 by Leander Heldring and James A. Robinson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Colonialism and Economic Development in Africa Leander Heldring and James A. Robinson NBER Working Paper No. 18566 November 2012 JEL No. N37,N47,O55 ABSTRACT In this paper we evaluate the impact of colonialism on development in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the world context, colonialism had very heterogeneous effects, operating through many mechanisms, sometimes encouraging development sometimes retarding it. In the African case, however, this heterogeneity is muted, making an assessment of the average effect more interesting.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Practice Directions
    CONSOLIDATED PRACTICE DIRECTIONS THE SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA 2009 (as updated on 7 October 2021) Unless otherwise indicated, references to the Rules are references to the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA); and Orders (O) and rules (r) in this document refer to the orders and rules of the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA). These can be accessed at the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office website at: www.legislation.wa.gov.au Table of Amendments 2012 - 2014 Date Practice Direction (PD) Number Replacement Pages 02/04/2012 Complete Reissue of the Supreme Court's All Consolidated Practice Directions further to a formatting update of the whole document. 27/7/2012 Insertion of PD 9.13 Interpreting and language 269 - 286 Services Guidelines; 9.13.1 Protocol for the Use of Interpreters; and 9.13.2 Interpreter Booking Request Form. 13/8/2012 Insertion of PD 5.8 Case Management. 159 - 168 Further to insertion of PD 9.13 and PD 5.8, the vi - viii & following pages to be reprinted to ensure 159 onwards correct pagination. 17/9/2012 Insertion of new PD 10.5 Practicing Solely as a 305 - 306 & viii Barrister. 21/11/2012 Insertion of new PD 9.1.4 Notice to 197 - 200 Non-Applying Executors. Further to insertion of PD 9.1.4, the following vii - viii & pages to be reprinted to ensure correct 197 onwards pagination. 12/3/2013 Insertion of new allowances in PD 4.7.1.1 - 119 - 121 Schedule of Standard Costs Orders for Interlocutory Applications. 13/3/2013 Insertion of No 18 into PD 4..4.1.1 - Checklist 98 for Entry for Trial.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Constitutional Instruments
    UGANDA GOVERNMENT U o- A ^ d-d,, 0-ùi ' 67//7i/7 à A) , UGANDA CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENTS The Uganda (Independence) Order in Council, 1962 and The Constitution of Uganda (excluding Schedules I to 6) in force on THE 31st DECEMBER, 1963 Printed and published by the Government Printer, Entebbe under the Authority of the Government of Uganda UGANDA CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENTS The Uganda (Independence) Order in Council, 1962 and The Constitution of Uganda (excluding Schedules I to 6) LOS ANGELES COUNTY LAW LIBRARY PREFACE THIS BOOKLET, which is intended to be used in conjunction with the edition of the Constitutional Instruments published in 1962, contains the Uganda (Independence) Order in Council, 1962, and the Constitution of Uganda, as in force on the 31st December, 1963. Where it appears that any provision of the Order in Council is spent or is not likely to be the subject of more than an occasional reference in the future, the provision in question has been printed in italics. This has been done merely for convenience. These provisions have not been repealed, and remain part of the Order. It has not been possible to include in this booklet Schedules 1 to 6 of the Constitution. For these Schedules, which contain the Constitution of Buganda, the special provisions for the other Federal States and the procedure for the election of members of the National Assembly from Buganda by the Lukiiko, it will still be necessary to refer to the 1962 edition of the Constitutional Instruments. G. L. BINAISA, Attorney-General. ENTEBBE, 30TH JANUARY, 1964. THE UGANDA (INDEPENDENCE) ORDER IN COUNCIL, 1962 ARRANGEMENT OF ORDER.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE STUDY: QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA by Judith Sebba, University of Sussex Graham Maxwell, Queensland Studies Authority NOT for CI
    WHAT WORKS IN INNOVATION IN EDUCATION CASE STUDY: QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA By Judith Sebba, University of Sussex Graham Maxwell, Queensland Studies Authority NOT FOR CITATION BACKGROUND: THE CONTEXT IN THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA Australia is a federation of six states and two territories (also referred to as the Commonwealth of Australia). Under the Australian Constitution, education is a state/territory responsibility and this autonomy is strongly defended on the basis of the need for responsiveness to geographical size and population dispersion, different histories and contexts, and regional needs and circumstances. Most public expenditure on education is sourced from direct or indirect taxation collected at country level and distributed through the states. Schools are government (public/state) or non-government with the latter made up of Catholic and Independent sectors. Approximately one-third of all school students are enrolled in non-government schools. Non-government schools are supported through state and federal government funding. Government school funding is mainly a state/territory matter though some funds also flow from the federal government. Most non-government schools also charge fees. Indigenous students comprise 3.4 per cent of all Australian school students. The percentage of Indigenous students enrolled in Queensland (5.3 per cent) is higher than the national average because of higher concentrations of Indigenous peoples in the north, especially Cape York and the Torres Strait Islands. Most Indigenous students in Queensland, (88 per cent) are enrolled in government schools. Currently, there is compulsory schooling in Queensland for 6-15 year olds (school years 1-10) with the two years of post-compulsory schooling for 16-17 year olds (school years 11-12).
    [Show full text]
  • Border Restrictions Updated 6 April 2021
    Please note, although we endeavour to provide you with the most up to date information derived from various third parties an d sources, we cannot be held accountable for any inaccuracies or changes to this information. Inclusion of company information in this matrix does no t imply any business relationship between the supplier and WFP / Logistics Cluster, and is used solely as a determinant of services, and capacities. Logistics Cluster /WFP maintain complete impartiality and are not in a position to endorse, comment on any company's suitability as a reputable serv ice provider. If you have any updates to share, please email them to: [email protected] Border Restrictions Updated 6 April 2021 State / Territory Restrictions (Other Info) Restriction Period Source of Info URL / Remarks State of Emergency is extended until 18 April 2021. Color-coded system to guide response. Current level is Code Blue. All entry permits suspended until further notice. All travellers must provide negative COVID-19 test results within 72 hours before arrival and are subject to full quarantine of 14 days. Moreover, the American Samoa traveller is required to disclose if he/she had a positive result prior to testing negative. American Samoa Until 18 April 2021 Government, 19 March https://www.americansamoa.gov/ Cargo flights into the Territory to deliver or retrieve cargo or mail will be allowed, provided that each 2021 occupant of the plane must furnish proof to the Director of Health of a negative COVID-19 test results within 72 hours before arrival, and further provided tht no one will disembark withouth the prior written approval of the Governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Malawi Systematic Country Diagnostic: Breaking the Cycle of Low Growth and Poverty Reduction
    Report No. 132785 Public Disclosure Authorized Malawi Systematic Country Diagnostic: Breaking the Cycle of Low Growth and Slow Poverty Reduction December 2018 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Malawi Country Team Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized i ABBREVIATION AND ACRONYMS ADMARC Agricultural Development and Marketing Corporation ANS Adjusted Net Savings APES Agricultural Production Estimates System BVIS Bwanje Valley Irrigation Scheme CDSSs Community Day Secondary Schools CBCCs community-based child care centers CPI Comparability of Consumer Price Index CCT Conditional cash transfers CEM Country Economic Memorandum DRM Disaster Risk Management ECD Early Childhood Development EASSy East Africa Submarine System IFPRI Food Policy Research Institute FPE Free Primary Education GPI Gender parity indexes GEI Global Entrepreneurship Index GDP Gross Domestic Product GER Gross enrollment rate GNI Gross national income IPPs Independent Power Producers IFMIS Integrated Financial Management Information System IHPS Integrated Household Panel Survey IHS Integrated Household Survey IRR internal rate of return IMP Investment Plan ECD Mainstream Early Childhood Development MACRA Malawi Communications Regulatory Authority MHRC Malawi Human Rights Commission SCTP Malawi’s Social Cash Transfer Program GNS Malawi's gross national savings MOAIWD Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development MPC Monetary Policy Committee MICS Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey NDRM National Disaster Risk Management NES National Export
    [Show full text]