DOCSLIB.ORG

A Talmud in Exile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A Talmud in Exile The Infl uence of Yerushalmi Avodah Zarah on the Formation of Bavli Avodah Zarah ALYSSA M. GRAY Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen A TALMUD IN EXILE 1 BJS \ 140342 \ Gray \ FOR PRESS Monday, August 01, 2005 12:29:28 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Program in Judaic Studies Brown University Box 1826 Providence, RI 02912 BROWN JUDAIC STUDIES Edited by David C. Jacobson Ross S. Kraemer Saul M. Olyan Michael L. Satlow Number 342 A TALMUD IN EXILE The Influence of Yerushalmi Avodah Zarah on the Formation of Bavli Avodah Zarah by Alyssa M. Gray 2 BJS \ 140342 \ Gray \ FOR PRESS Monday, August 01, 2005 12:29:28 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen A Talmud in Exile The Influence of Yerushalmi Avodah Zarah on the Formation of Bavli Avodah Zarah Alyssa M. Gray Brown Judaic Studies Providence, Rhode Island 3 BJS \ 140342 \ Gray \ FOR PRESS Monday, August 01, 2005 12:29:28 PM A Talmud in Exile The Influence of Yerushalmi Avodah Zarah on the Formation of Bavli Avodah Zarah Alyssa M. Gray Copyright © 2020 by Brown University Library of Congress Control Number: 2019953417 Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities/ Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCom- mercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. To use this book, or parts of this book, in any way not covered by the license, please contact Brown Judaic Studies, Brown University, Box 1826, Providence, RI 02912. Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen To my parents, Robert and Miriam Gray 5 BJS \ 140342 \ Gray \ FOR PRESS Monday, August 01, 2005 12:29:29 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen 6 BJS \ 140342 \ Gray \ FOR PRESS Monday, August 01, 2005 12:29:29 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Contents Acknowledgments. xi Conventions and Abbreviations . xiii Chapter 1 • Introduction. 1 I. The Question . 1 II. Factors Complicating Resolution of the Question . 3 III. Prior Research on the Relationship between the Talmuds . 8 IV. The Method of This Book. 33 Chapter 2 • B. Avodah Zarah Drew Sequences of Sugyot and Topics from Y. Avodah Zarah (Macro Analysis). 41 I. B. Avodah Zarah Tends to Appropriate Y. Avodah Zarah Sugyot (or Sequences of Two or More Y. Avodah Zarah Sugyot in the Same Order as Y. Avodah Zarah) Attached to the Same Mishnah . 43 II. B. Avodah Zarah Builds a Complex Sugya Using Some Materials Marked as Relevant by the Y. Avodah Zarah Redactors. 53 III. When Material in B. Avodah Zarah Has a Parallel in Y. Avodah Zarah and in Some Other Rabbinic Compilation, B. Avodah Zarah Tends to More Closely Resemble Y. Avodah Zarah . 59 IV. Y. Avodah Zarah And B. Avodah Zarah Place Similar Material at a Similar Point in the Tractate, Although Not Attached to the Same Mishnaic Passage . 69 vii 7 BJS \ 140342 \ Gray \ FOR PRESS Monday, August 01, 2005 12:29:29 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen V. Y. Avodah Zarah and B. Avodah Zarah Use the Same Mishnah as the Occasion to Explore the Same Legal Issue (Or Present Similar Genres of Materials) . 73 VI. Did Y. Avodah Zarah Rely on Babylonian Sugyot in B. Avodah Zarah? . 77 VII. Conclusion . 85 Chapter 3 • B. Avodah Zarah Sugyot as Secondary Reworkings of Y. Avodah Zarah Sugyot (Micro Analysis I) . 87 I. B. Avodah Zarah Reworks Y. Avodah Zarah to Introduce a Babylonian Cultural or Halakhic Perspective or Linguistic Feature . 101 II. B. Avodah Zarah Tends to Eliminate Materials of Particular Relevance to the Land of Israel or Its Roman Cultural Context . 121 III. At Times B. Avodah Zarah Organizes Materials in a More Sensible Order Than Y. Avodah Zarah . 125 IV. B. Avodah Zarah Views a Source in Connection with an Amoraic Concern That Y. Avodah Zarah Had Viewed in Connection with the Mishnah . 136 V. B. Avodah Zarah Reworks Y. Avodah Zarah Sugyot in Order to Raise Legal Issues to a Higher Level of Abstraction . 142 VI. Conclusion . 147 Chapter 4 • B. Avodah Zarah’s Awareness of Y. Avodah Zarah’s Editing (Micro Analysis II) . 149 I. B. Avodah Zarah Begins at the Point at Which Y. Avodah Zarah Leaves Off . 149 II. B. Avodah Zarah Answers a Question Left Virtually Unanswered in Y. Avodah Zarah . 160 III. B. Avodah Zarah Moves in the Same Direction as Y. Avodah Zarah, But Uses Different Sources. 163 IV. Conclusion . 172 viii 8 BJS \ 140342 \ Gray \ FOR PRESS Monday, August 01, 2005 12:29:29 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Chapter 5 • The Provenance of Anonymous Material in the Bavli and the Role of Anonymous Material in B. Avodah Zarah’s Appropriation of Y. Avodah Zarah (Micro Analysis III) . 175 I. Precursors in the Study of the Anonymous Bavli in Relation to Palestinian Learning: Isaac Halevy and Zwi Moshe Dor . 176 II. David Halivni’s Contribution to the Study of the Anonymous Bavli . 177 III. Anonymous Statements in the Bavli Can Be Attributed to Palestinian Amoraim . 178 IV. Anonymous Material in B. Avodah Zarah That Is Also Anonymous in Y. Avodah Zarah . 182 V. Anonymous Material in the Bavli That Cannot Be Shown to Be Palestinian . 188 VI. Conclusion . 195 Appendix: The Babylonian Anonymous Bavli Shows the Influence of a Babylonian Halakhic Agenda . 196 Chapter 6 • The Historical Context of B. Avodah Zarah’s Appropriation of Y. Avodah Zarah . 199 I. Palestine in the Sixth and Seventh Centuries . 201 II. What Babylonian Generation Is Aware of Y. Avodah Zarah? . 213 III. In What Form(s) Did the Redacted Yerushalmi Exist? . 217 IV. Conclusion . 233 Appendix: The Alleged Geonic Teshuvah in the Sefer ha-Eshkol . 235 Chapter 7 • Conclusion: Y. Avodah Zarah Influenced the Formation of B. Avodah Zarah. 239 Appendix: Complete List of Sugyot Drawn from Y. Avodah Zarah by B. Avodah Zarah . 243 Selected Bibliography. 247 General Index . 259 ix 9 BJS \ 140342 \ Gray \ FOR PRESS Monday, August 01, 2005 12:29:29 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen 10 BJS \ 140342 \ Gray \ FOR PRESS Monday, August 01, 2005 12:29:29 PM Publishers’ Preface rown Judaic Studies has been publishing scholarly books in all areas Bof Judaic studies for forty years. Our books, many of which contain groundbreaking scholarship, were typically printed in small runs and are not easily accessible outside of major research libraries. We are delighted that with the support of a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities/Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Pro- gram, we are now able to make available, in digital, open-access, format, fifty titles from our backlist. In A Talmud in Exile: The Influence of Yerushalmi Avodah Zarah on the For- mation of the Bavli (2005), Alyssa M. Gray argues that there was an “early Talmud” created in Palestine that found its way to Babylonia, upon which later editors there based their own work. It remains a relevant and provoc- ative work that will hopefully renew interest in the relationship between the two Talmuds. This edition includes a new preface but is otherwise identical to the original text. Michael L. Satlow Managing Editor October, 2019 Preface to the Digital Edition am grateful for this opportunity to introduce A Talmud in Exile: The IInfluence of Yerushalmi Avodah Zarah on the Formation of Bavli Avodah Zarah to new readers, and to reintroduce it—by way of these retrospec- tive reflections—to the many readers who have grappled with its argu- ments since it was first published in 2005. A Talmud in Exile was the result of my systematic study of the widely known phenomenon that many Bavli tractates exhibit broad similarities to their Yerushalmi counterparts in the selection and arrangement of material. On a more granular level,- this phenomenon is made manifest in discernible striking similarities in structure and content between the Yerushalmi and Bavli gemarot to particular mishnah pericopes (in many, but not all cases). My quest in the late 1990’s to find a satisfactory explanation for this phenomenon in the excellent scholarship available at that time left me dissatisfied. I found that some scholars seemed to ignore the similari- ties in structure and content between a Bavli tractate and its Yerushalmi counterpart, focusing more on the two Talmuds’ numerous and obvious differences. These differences were proclaimed fatal to a conclusion that the Bavli tractate was in any way influenced by the Yerushalmi. Other scholars closely studied the Palestinian amoraic material common to a Bavli-Yerushalmi tractate pair and examined Babylonian amoraic recep- tion and reworking of this material. Some dubbed this Palestinian amo- raic material “talmud kadum” (“early talmud”), others called it “homer basisi amora’i kadum”(“early foundational amoraic material,” or “early basic amoraic material” as I translate it in the book) and still others labe- led it “siddur kadum” (“early arrangement”). These scholars assumed— overtly or tacitly, typically tacitly—that the similarities in structure and content between a Bavli tractate and its Yerushalmi counterpart could be explained largely, if not entirely, by this amoraic-era transmission of Palestinian amoraic material. Now, it is undeniable that Babylonian amoraim received, transmit- ted, and reworked Palestinian amoraic material.Some Babylonian amo- raim, especially those of the fourth generation and later, are portrayed as interacting with nehotei (“those who descend”; sages portrayed as traveling between Palestine and Babylonia, bearing rabbinic traditions).
Recommended publications
  • Should Bakeries Which Are Open on Shabbat Be Supervised? a Response to the Rabinowitz-Weisberg Opinion RABBI HOWARD HANDLER

    Should Bakeries Which Are Open on Shabbat Be Supervised? a Response to the Rabinowitz-Weisberg Opinion RABBI HOWARD HANDLER

    Should Bakeries Which are Open on Shabbat Be Supervised? A Response to the Rabinowitz-Weisberg Opinion RABBI HOWARD HANDLER This paper was submitted as a response to the responsum written by Rabbi Mayer Rabinowitz and Ms. Dvora Weisberg entitled "Rabbinic Supervision of Jewish Owned Businesses Operating on Shabbat" which was adopted by the CJLS on February 26, 1986. Should rabbis offer rabbinic supervision to bakeries which are open on Shabbat? i1 ~, '(l) l'\ (1) The food itself is indeed kosher after Shabbat, once the time required to prepare it has elapsed. 1 The halakhah is according to Rabbi Yehudah and not according to the Mishnah which is Rabbi Meir's opinion. (2) While a Jew who does not observe all the mitzvot is in some instances deemed trustworthy, this is never the case regarding someone who flagrantly disregards the laws of Shabbat, especially for personal profit. Maimonides specifically excludes such a person's trustworthiness regarding his own actions.2 Moreover in the case of n:nv 77n~ (a violator of Shabbat) Maimonides explicitly rejects his trustworthiness. 3 No support can be brought from Moshe Feinstein who concludes, "even if the proprietor closes his store on Shabbat, [since it is known to all that he does not observe Shabbat], we assume he only wants to impress other observant Jews so they will buy from him."4 Previously in the same responsum R. Feinstein emphasizes that even if the person in The Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly provides guidance in matters of halakhah for the Conservative movement.
  • ONEIROCRITICS and MIDRASH on Reading Dreams and the Scripture

    ONEIROCRITICS and MIDRASH on Reading Dreams and the Scripture

    ONEIROCRITICS AND MIDRASH On Reading Dreams and the Scripture Erik Alvstad A bstr act In the context of ancient theories of dreams and their interpretation, the rabbinic literature offers particularly interesting loci. Even though the view on the nature of dreams is far from un- ambiguous, the rabbinic tradition of oneirocritics, i.e. the discourse on how dreams are interpreted, stands out as highly original. As has been shown in earlier research, oneirocritics resembles scriptural interpretation, midrash, to which it has lent some of its exegetical rules. This article will primarily investigate the interpreter’s role in the rabbinic practice of dream interpretation, as reflected in a few rabbinic stories from the two Talmuds and from midrashim. It is shown that these narrative examples have some common themes. They all illustrate the polysemy of the dream-text, and how the person who puts an interpretation on it constructs the dream’s significance. Most of the stories also emphasize that the outcome of the dream is postponed until triggered by its interpretation. Thus the dreams are, in a sense, pictured as prophetic – but it is rather the interpreter that constitutes the prophetic instance, not the dream itself. This analysis is followed by a concluding discussion on the analogical relation between the Scripture and the dream-text, and the interpretative practices of midrash and oneirocritics. he striking similarities between the rabbinic traditions of Scriptural exegesis, midrash, and the rabbinic practice of Tdream interpretation,
  • Modern Approaches to the Talmud: Sacha Stern | University College London

    Modern Approaches to the Talmud: Sacha Stern | University College London

    09/29/21 HEBR7411: Modern approaches to the Talmud: Sacha Stern | University College London HEBR7411: Modern approaches to the View Online Talmud: Sacha Stern Albeck, Chanoch, Mavo La-Talmudim (Tel-Aviv: Devir, 1969) Alexander, Elizabeth Shanks, Transmitting Mishnah: The Shaping Influence of Oral Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006) Amit, Aaron, Makom She-Nahagu: Pesahim Perek 4 (Yerushalayim: ha-Igud le-farshanut ha-Talmud, 2009), Talmud ha-igud Ba’adani, Netanel, Hayu Bodkin: Sanhedrin Perek 5 (Yerushalayim: ha-Igud le-farshanut ha-Talmud, 2012), Talmud ha-igud Bar-Asher Siegal, Michal, Early Christian Monastic Literature and the Babylonian Talmud (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013) Benovitz, Moshe, Lulav va-Aravah ve-Hahalil: Sukkah Perek 4-5 (Yerushalayim: ha-Igud le-farshanut ha-Talmud, 2013), Talmud ha-igud ———, Me-Ematai Korin et Shema: Berakhot Perek 1 (Yerushalayim: ha-Igud le-farshanut ha-Talmud, 2006), Talmud ha-igud Brody, Robert, Mishnah and Tosefta Studies, First edition, July 2014 (Jerusalem: The Hebrew university, Magnes press, 2014) ———, The Geonim of Babylonia and the Shaping of Medieval Jewish Culture, Paperback ed., with a new preface and an updated bibliography (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013) Carmy, Shalom, Modern Scholarship in the Study of Torah: Contributions and Limitations (Northvale, N.J.: J. Aronson, 1996), The Orthodox Forum series Chernick, Michael L., Essential Papers on the Talmud (New York: New York University Press, 1994), Essential papers on Jewish studies Daṿid Halivni, Meḳorot U-Masorot (Nashim), ha-Mahadurah ha-sheniyah (Ṭoronṭo, Ḳanadah: Hotsaʼat Otsarenu) ———, Meḳorot U-Masorot: Seder Moʼed (Yerushalayim: Bet ha-Midrash le-Rabanim be-Ameriḳah be-siṿuʻa Keren Moshe (Gusṭaṿ) Ṿortsṿayler, 735) ‘dTorah.com’ <http://dtorah.com/> 1/5 09/29/21 HEBR7411: Modern approaches to the Talmud: Sacha Stern | University College London Epstein, J.
  • 1 Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos

    1 Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos

    Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos: Some Tentative Thoughts David Berger The deep and systemic tension between contemporary egalitarianism and many authoritative Jewish texts about gentiles takes varying forms. Most Orthodox Jews remain untroubled by some aspects of this tension, understanding that Judaism’s affirmation of chosenness and hierarchy can inspire and ennoble without denigrating others. In other instances, affirmations of metaphysical differences between Jews and gentiles can take a form that makes many of us uncomfortable, but we have the legitimate option of regarding them as non-authoritative. Finally and most disturbing, there are positions affirmed by standard halakhic sources from the Talmud to the Shulhan Arukh that apparently stand in stark contrast to values taken for granted in the modern West and taught in other sections of the Torah itself. Let me begin with a few brief observations about the first two categories and proceed to somewhat more extended ruminations about the third. Critics ranging from medieval Christians to Mordecai Kaplan have directed withering fire at the doctrine of the chosenness of Israel. Nonetheless, if we examine an overarching pattern in the earliest chapters of the Torah, we discover, I believe, that this choice emerges in a universalist context. The famous statement in the Mishnah (Sanhedrin 4:5) that Adam was created singly so that no one would be able to say, “My father is greater than yours” underscores the universality of the original divine intent. While we can never know the purpose of creation, one plausible objective in light of the narrative in Genesis is the opportunity to actualize the values of justice and lovingkindness through the behavior of creatures who subordinate themselves to the will 1 of God.
  • Foreword, Abbreviations, Glossary

    Foreword, Abbreviations, Glossary

    FOREWORD, ABBREVIATIONS, GLOSSARY The Soncino Babylonian Talmud TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH WITH NOTES Reformatted by Reuven Brauner, Raanana 5771 1 FOREWORDS, ABBREVIATIONS, GLOSSARY Halakhah.com Presents the Contents of the Soncino Babylonian Talmud TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH WITH NOTES, GLOSSARY AND INDICES UNDER THE EDITORSHIP OF R AB B I D R . I. EPSTEIN B.A., Ph.D., D. Lit. FOREWORD BY THE VERY REV. THE LATE CHIEF RABBI DR. J. H. HERTZ INTRODUCTION BY THE EDITOR THE SONCINO PRESS LONDON Original footnotes renumbered. 2 FOREWORDS, ABBREVIATIONS, GLOSSARY These are the Sedarim ("orders", or major There are about 12,800 printed pages in the divisions) and tractates (books) of the Soncino Talmud, not counting introductions, Babylonian Talmud, as translated and indexes, glossaries, etc. Of these, this site has organized for publication by the Soncino about 8050 pages on line, comprising about Press in 1935 - 1948. 1460 files — about 63% of the Soncino Talmud. This should in no way be considered The English terms in italics are taken from a substitute for the printed edition, with the the Introductions in the respective Soncino complete text, fully cross-referenced volumes. A summary of the contents of each footnotes, a master index, an index for each Tractate is given in the Introduction to the tractate, scriptural index, rabbinical index, Seder, and a detailed summary by chapter is and so on. given in the Introduction to the Tractate. SEDER ZERA‘IM (Seeds : 11 tractates) Introduction to Seder Zera‘im — Rabbi Dr. I Epstein INDEX Foreword — The Very Rev. The Chief Rabbi Israel Brodie Abbreviations Glossary 1.
  • Demai for the Poor

    Demai for the Poor

    בס"ד Volume 13. Issue 11 Demai for the Poor The Mishnah (3:1) teaches that one is able to feed that the Rambam explained the leniency was motivated demai produce to the poor. In other words, the to ease the mitzvah of tzedaka. Consequently, the requirement of separating terumot and maasrot from leniency is only afforded to the ani in that context - demai produce is lifted for an ani (poor person). The when one feeds an ani. If, however the ani receives a Mishnah continues that this leniency was also afforded good portion as part of a tzedaka distribution and takes to the achsanya. The Bartenura explains that this refers it home, then he is obligated to separate Demai. He to Jewish soldiers that passed through from town to explains that that is why the Mishnah used to word town. By force of law, the people of each town were “ma’achilin” (feed) and not “ochlin” (eat) when made responsible to feed them. Why are these people teaching this exemption, since it is only in the context excluded from the gezeirah of demai? of feeding the ani that he is exempt. This would also explain why the Mishnah only records the requirement Rashi (Eiruvin 17b) explains that whether or not one is of informing the ani in the case of a tzedaka truly required to separate terumot and maasrot from distribution but not in the case of feeding aniim demai. demai is doubtful – it is a safek. Furthermore, most Amei Haaretz separated everything that was required The Tosfot Yom Tov, however notes that the Rambam anyway.
  • The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿavoda Zara By

    The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿavoda Zara By

    The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿAvoda Zara By Mira Beth Wasserman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley in Jewish Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Boyarin, chair Professor Chana Kronfeld Professor Naomi Seidman Professor Kenneth Bamberger Spring 2014 Abstract The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿAvoda Zara by Mira Beth Wasserman Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Boyarin, chair In this dissertation, I argue that there is an ethical dimension to the Babylonian Talmud, and that literary analysis is the approach best suited to uncover it. Paying special attention to the discursive forms of the Talmud, I show how juxtapositions of narrative and legal dialectics cooperate in generating the Talmud's distinctive ethics, which I characterize as an attentiveness to the “exceptional particulars” of life. To demonstrate the features and rewards of a literary approach, I offer a sustained reading of a single tractate from the Babylonian Talmud, ʿAvoda Zara (AZ). AZ and other talmudic discussions about non-Jews offer a rich resource for considerations of ethics because they are centrally concerned with constituting social relationships and with examining aspects of human experience that exceed the domain of Jewish law. AZ investigates what distinguishes Jews from non-Jews, what Jews and non- Jews share in common, and what it means to be a human being. I read AZ as a cohesive literary work unified by the overarching project of examining the place of humanity in the cosmos.
  • 1 Parashat Ki Tavo Rabbi David Silverberg Parashat Ki-Tavo Begins

    1 Parashat Ki Tavo Rabbi David Silverberg Parashat Ki-Tavo Begins

    Parashat Ki Tavo Rabbi David Silverberg Parashat Ki-Tavo begins by discussing the mitzva of bikkurim, which requires a farmer to bring his first fruits each year to Jerusalem as a gift to the officiating kohen. Among the unique features of this mitzva, as the Torah describes, is the mikra bikkurim declaration which the farmer must recite as part of the bikkurim ceremony. This declaration, which the Torah dictates in our parasha (26:5-10), briefly recounts the story of the Exodus, from the time of Yaakov until Benei Yisrael’s departure from Egypt, and then tells of the nation’s entry into the land. Maimonides introduces this obligation in Mishneh Torah (Hilkhot Bikkurim 3:10) by writing, “There is an affirmative command to confess in the Temple over the bikkurim” (“Mitzvat asei le-hitvadot be-Midkash al ha-bikkurim…”). Curiously, Maimonides defines this declaration as a viduy, a “confession.” This term is familiar to us from two other contexts, most obviously the mitzva of teshuva, which Maimonides, in the beginning of Hilkhot Teshuva, defines as essentially an obligation to verbally confess. Additionally, the Sages employed the term viduy also in reference to the second mitzva presented in Parashat Ki-Tavo, a halakha known as viduy ma’aser. This obligation requires a farmer to pronounce a declaration every three years affirming his compliance with the laws of terumot and ma’aserot (the required tithes and other gifts from his agricultural yield). Maimonides, interestingly enough, applies the term viduy also to mikra bikkurim. Many writers have addressed the question as to how the concept of “confession” relates to viduy ma’aser, in which a farmer announces that he has faithfully observed all the laws applying to his agricultural produce.
  • Pesachim 036.Pub

    Pesachim 036.Pub

    י"ב טבת תשפא“ Sun, Dec 27 2020 OVERVIEW of the Daf Distinctive INSIGHT 1) Fulfilling the mitzvah of matzah with tevel (cont.) Matzah cannot be made from Bikkurim אוציא חיטין ושעורין שיש במין ביכורים Ravina offers an alternative explanation to the Baraisa but the Gemara demonstrates that the explanation offered by R’ Sheishes is clearer. T he Gemara brings a Baraisa which teaches that mat- 2) Matzah made from ma’aser sheni grain zah cannot be made from fruits which are brought to A Baraisa is cited that records different sources that do Yerushalayim as Bikkurim. Rabbi Yosi HaGalili learns this not permit the use of ma’aser sheni grain for the mitzvah of from the verse which describes matzah as something that is in all your communities,” which— בכל מושבותיכם “ matzah. eaten An apparent contradiction is noted regarding R’ Akiva’s excludes Bikkurim fruits which can only be eaten in position concerning matzah that was kneaded with liquids Yerushalayim. Rabbi Akiva also determines that the mitz- other than water. vah of matzah cannot be fulfilled from Bikkurim, and he The Gemara resolves the contradiction by distinguishing learns this from the association between matzah and mar- between the first day of Pesach and the remaining days of ror (in the verse Bemidbar 9:11). We know that a person Pesach. cannot fulfill his obligation to eat marror with Bikkurim. 3) Kneading dough in lukewarm water So too, claims Rabbi Akiva, matzah cannot be performed The Gemara questions why the previous Baraisa does not with Bikkurim. permit the use of lukewarm water to make matzah whereas The Gemara then clarifies the analysis of Rabbi Akiva.
  • The Relationship Between Targum Song of Songs and Midrash Rabbah Song of Songs

    The Relationship Between Targum Song of Songs and Midrash Rabbah Song of Songs

    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TARGUM SONG OF SONGS AND MIDRASH RABBAH SONG OF SONGS Volume I of II A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2010 PENELOPE ROBIN JUNKERMANN SCHOOL OF ARTS, HISTORIES, AND CULTURES TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME ONE TITLE PAGE ............................................................................................................ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................. 2 ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. 6 DECLARATION ........................................................................................................ 7 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ....................................................................................... 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DEDICATION ............................................................... 9 CHAPTER ONE : INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 11 1.1 The Research Question: Targum Song and Song Rabbah ......................... 11 1.2 The Traditional View of the Relationship of Targum and Midrash ........... 11 1.2.1 Targum Depends on Midrash .............................................................. 11 1.2.2 Reasons for Postulating Dependency .................................................. 14 1.2.2.1 Ambivalence of Rabbinic Sources Towards Bible Translation .... 14 1.2.2.2 The Traditional
  • The Decline of the Generations (Haazinu)

    The Decline of the Generations (Haazinu)

    21 Sep 2020 – 3 Tishri 5781 B”H Dr Maurice M. Mizrahi Congregation Adat Reyim Torah discussion on Haazinu The Decline of the Generations Introduction In this week’s Torah portion, Haazinu, Moses tells the Israelites to remember their people’s past: זְכֹר֙יְמֹ֣ות םעֹולָָ֔ ב ִּ֖ ינּו נ֣ שְ ֹותּדֹור־וָד֑ ֹור שְאַַ֤ ל אָב ֙יך֙ וְ יַגֵָ֔דְ ךזְקֵנ ִּ֖יך וְ יֹֹ֥אמְ רּו לְָָֽך Remember the days of old. Consider the years of generation after generation. Ask your father and he will inform you; your elders, and they will tell you. [Deut. 32:7] He then warns them that prosperity (growing “fat, thick and rotund”) and contact with idolaters will cause them to fall away from their faith, so they should keep alive their connection with their past. Yeridat HaDorot Strong rabbinic doctrine: Yeridat HaDorot – the decline of the generations. Successive generations are further and further away from the revelation at Sinai, and so their spirituality and ability to understand the Torah weakens steadily. Also, errors of transmission may have been introduced, especially considering a lot of the Law was oral: מש הק בֵלּתֹורָ ה מ סינַי, ּומְ סָרָ ּהל יהֹושֻׁעַ , ו יהֹושֻׁעַ ל זְקֵנים, ּוזְקֵנים ל נְב יאים, ּונְב יא ים מְ סָ רּוהָ ילְאַנְשֵ נכְ ס ת הַגְדֹולָה Moses received the Torah from Sinai and transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, and the elders to the prophets, and the prophets to the Men of the Great Assembly. [Avot 1:1] The Mishnah mourns the Sages of ages past and the fact that they will never be replaced: When Rabbi Meir died, the composers of parables ceased.
  • Of Selected Amoraim/Saboraim

    Of Selected Amoraim/Saboraim

    INDEX OF SELECTED AMORAIM/SABORAIM Abuha de-Shmuel n. 190, 95–97, 66, 95–97 and activity in Nehardea 4 n. 6 n. 269 R. Adda b. Ahava I chronological location 37–43 chronological location 112 confused with “the Nehardean pupil of Rav 112 say” 42–43 R. Adda b. Ahava (Abba) II confused with Amemar bar Mar chronological location 112 n. 69 Yanuka 41 pupil of Rava 112 n. 69 confused with R. Yemar 41 R. Adda b. Minyumi died during R. Ashi’s lifetime 40–41 chronological location 148 n. 115 geographical location 44–45 subject to the authority of halakhic rulings in actual Rabina 148 n. 115 cases 55–66 R. Aha b. Jacob halakhic rulings issued in Nehardea and the exilarch 135 67–82 chronological location 133–136 halakhic rulings issued in Sura, does not interact with second and Mahoza or Pumbedita 55–56 third generation amoraim 134 interpretation of tannaitic present in R. Huna’s pirka 136–138 sources 84–91, 93–94 and n. 256 quotes halakhic tradition in the legal methodology compared name of third generation with Nehardean amoraim 84 amoraim 133–134 (Samuel, R. Sheshet, subordinates to R. Nahman 133 R. Nahman), 92–93 and n. 252 and n. 26 (R. Zebid of Nehardea), 176 superior to R. Aha son of (R. Zebid of Nehardea), 193 R. Ika 135–136 (R. Dimi of Nehardea) superior to R. Elazar of Hagrunya literary contribution compared with and R. Aha b. Tahlifa 136 sages from his generation 84–85, superior to R. Papa/Papi 135 93–94 n.