DOCSLIB.ORG

Morphological Divergence of Native and Recently Established Populations of White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodon Tularosa) Author(S): Michael L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Morphological Divergence of Native and Recently Established Populations of White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodon Tularosa) Author(S): Michael L Morphological Divergence of Native and Recently Established Populations of White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa) Author(s): Michael L. Collyer, James M. Novak, Craig A. Stockwell Source: Copeia, Vol. 2005, No. 1 (Feb. 24, 2005), pp. 1-11 Published by: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4098615 . Accessed: 13/01/2011 13:16 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=asih. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Copeia. http://www.jstor.org 2005, No. 1 COPEIA February24 Copeia,2005(1), pp. 1-11 Morphological Divergence of Native and Recently Established Populations of White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodontularosa) MICHAELL. COLLYER,JAMES M. NOVAK,AND CRAIG A. STOCKWELL We used landmark-based geometric morphometric methods to describe patterns of body shape variation and shape covariation with size among populations of the threatened White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa), a species that occurs in dissimilar aquatic habitats. White Sands Pupfish populations include two genetically distinct, native populations that have been historically isolated in Salt Creek, a saline river, and Malpais Spring, a brackish spring. In addition, two populations were es- tablished approximately 30 years before this study by translocation of fish from Salt Creek to Lost River (a saline river) and Mound Spring (a brackish spring). We found significant body shape variation among populations and between males and females. Body shapes were more slender for females than for males and more slender for saline river populations than brackish spring populations. Introductions of pupfish to new habitats resulted in significant departures in body shape and shape allometry from the native Salt Creek population. Shape divergence was more pronounced for the Mound Spring population, which is consistent with a greater change in abiotic conditions. Although Mound Spring pupfish, like Malpais Spring pupfish, were more deep-bodied than saline river pupfish, differences in body shape and the level of sexual dimorphism were significant between the two brackish spring populations, indicating that deep-bodied shapes may be achieved from different anatomical con- figurations. The significant shape divergence of introduced populations warrants consideration for the conservation of this rare species, as creation of refuge pop- ulations for native stocks is a current management strategy. UPFISHES the methods for the of Rohlf P of genus Cyprinodonrepre- analysis shape (e.g., sent a group of fishes known for their abil- and Slice, 1990). These techniques, inclusively ity to tolerate variable environmental conditions named geometric morphometrics (Rohlf and in desert aquatic habitats of North America. Marcus 1993; Adams et al., 2004), describe the Morphological diversification of inland species spatial arrangement of anatomical features of is thought to be associated with isolation of pop- organisms, providing statistical (Rohlf, 1999) ulations in ecologically disparate, remnant and visual (e.g., Caldecutt and Adams, 1998; Ad- aquatic habitats following desiccation of large ams and Rohlf, 2000; Rfiber and Adams, 2001) Pleistocene lakes (Miller, 1981). Early accounts advantages to traditional approaches based on of species descriptions were based chiefly on dif- linear distance measures. These techniques ferences in morphometric and meristic data have been used increasingly over the past de- (e.g., Hubbs, 1932; Miller, 1943, 1948). These cade with morphological data from fishes for early papers represent exhaustive studies of spe- studies of phylogenetics and species descrip- cies descriptions, where detailed morphometric tions (e.g., Corti and Crosetti, 1996; Cavalcanti and meristic measurements were compared, et al., 1999; Douglas et al., 2001), ontogenetic trait-by-trait. However, intraspecific ecological allometry (e.g., Walker, 1993; Hood and Heins, morphology comparisons have not been consid- 2000; Gallo-Da-Silva et al., 2002), trophic mor- ered in detail for this group of fishes, despite phology (e.g., Caldecutt and Adams, 1999; Rfib- their renowned ability to survive in a variety of er and Adams, 2001), ecological morphology aquatic desert habitats. (e.g., Corti et al., 1996; Walker, 1996, 1997), and Recent advances in morphometric analytical osteology (e.g., Loy et al., 1999, 2001). Geo- techniques have provided statistically powerful metric morphometric methods allow fine-scale C 2005 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists 2 COPEIA, 2005, NO. 1 assessment of shape differences and, therefore, among populations, shape covariation with pup- could be valuable for discerning patterns of in- fish size (shape allometry), and sexual dimor- traspecific morphological variation. phism in body shape, to gain an understanding In this study, we use landmark-based, geo- of pupfish ecological morphology. metric morphometric methods to describe pat- terns of body shape variation and covariation MATERIALSAND METHODS with fish size among populations of White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa), which occur in We examined 393 specimens of White Sands dissimilar environments in the Tularosa Basin Pupfish collected from the four populations (N in southern New Mexico. The White Sands Pup- = 49-50 females and N = 45-50 males from each fish is listed as threatened by New Mexico and population). Descriptions of collection sites are composed of two native and two recently intro- described in detail by Collyer (2003). Nonmet- duced populations (Pittenger and Springer, ric multidimensional scaling revealed that 1999). The native populations occur in brackish White Sands Pupfish habitats can be distinctly spring (Malpais Spring) and saline river (Salt described as brackish springs (BS = Malpais Creek) habitats and have been isolated presum- Spring and Mound Spring) or saline rivers (SR ably since the desiccation of the Pleistocene = Salt Creek and Lost River) based on abiotic Lake Otero (Miller and Echelle, 1975; Pittenger factors including temperature, salinity, and wa- and Springer, 1999). Miller and Echelle (1975) ter flow (Collyer, 2003). noted morphological and meristic differences between the two native populations. Salt Creek Fish collection and landmark acquisition.--Adult Pupfish had a more slender body and scales that pupfish were used in this study to reduce the were smaller and more numerous. In addition, amount of intrapopulation shape variation Salt Creek Pupfish had less scalation of the bel- based on ontogeny. Pupfish were collected from ly. These differences did not warrant subspecies 26 May to 8 June 2001, at the middle sections designation, however, according to the authors. of Lost River (26-27 May) and Salt Creek (30 Nevertheless, genetic distinction of the two na- May), the springhead and outflow marsh of Mal- tive populations has been reported (Stockwell pais Spring (4-5 June), and the upper pond of et al., 1998; Iyengar et al., 2004) based on fixed Mound Spring (8 June). Fish were live-captured or nearly fixed differences in allele frequencies with unbaited minnow traps placed at depths of allozymes and microsatellites. less than one meter at Lost River and Salt The two introduced populations also occur in Creek, with beach seines at Mound Spring, and a brackish spring (Mound Spring) and a saline with a combination of the two techniques at river (Lost River). These populations were es- Malpais Spring. Fish were transported live to a tablished circa 1970 (Pittenger and Springer, research laboratory at Holloman Air Force 1999) from translocation of Salt Creek fish Base, sacrificed in approximately 500 mg/L tri- (Stockwell et al., 1998). They are not genetically caine methanesulfonate (MS 222; Summerfelt differentiated fi-om the Salt Creek population and Smith, 1990), separated into female and based on genetic distances using allozyme and male groups, and placed into ice baths. Fish microsatellite data (Stockwell et al., 1998), but were patted dry, labeled, and photographed the introductions resulted in shifts in allele fre- within two hours of sacrifice. quency from the Salt Creek population and loss Digital photographs were captured with a of some alleles at various microsatellite markers Minolta RD-175(r) digital camera mounted on for both introduced populations (Stockwell and a photography table approximately 0.25 m di- Mulvey, 1998; Stockwell et al., 1998; Miller,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edna Assay Development
    Environmental DNA assays available for species detection via qPCR analysis at the U.S.D.A Forest Service National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC). Asterisks indicate the assay was designed at the NGC. This list was last updated in June 2021 and is subject to change. Please contact [email protected] with questions. Family Species Common name Ready for use? Mustelidae Martes americana, Martes caurina American and Pacific marten* Y Castoridae Castor canadensis American beaver Y Ranidae Lithobates catesbeianus American bullfrog Y Cinclidae Cinclus mexicanus American dipper* N Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel Y Soricidae Sorex palustris American water shrew* N Salmonidae Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp Any cutthroat trout* N Petromyzontidae Lampetra spp. Any Lampetra* Y Salmonidae Salmonidae Any salmonid* Y Cottidae Cottidae Any sculpin* Y Salmonidae Thymallus arcticus Arctic grayling* Y Cyrenidae Corbicula fluminea Asian clam* N Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic Salmon Y Lymnaeidae Radix auricularia Big-eared radix* N Cyprinidae Mylopharyngodon piceus Black carp N Ictaluridae Ameiurus melas Black Bullhead* N Catostomidae Cycleptus elongatus Blue Sucker* N Cichlidae Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia* N Catostomidae Catostomus discobolus Bluehead sucker* N Catostomidae Catostomus virescens Bluehead sucker* Y Felidae Lynx rufus Bobcat* Y Hylidae Pseudocris maculata Boreal chorus frog N Hydrocharitaceae Egeria densa Brazilian elodea N Salmonidae Salvelinus fontinalis Brook trout* Y Colubridae Boiga irregularis Brown tree snake*
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Watershed Assessment Tularosa Valley Watershed
    Tularosa Valley Watershed (HUC8 13050003) Rapid Watershed Assessment Tularosa Valley Watershed 1 Tularosa Valley Watershed (HUC8 13050003) The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 2 Tularosa Valley Watershed (HUC8 13050003) Table of Contents Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................... 7 Precipitation .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Three New Pupfish Species, Cyprinodon (Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae), from Chihuahua, México, and Arizona, USA Author(S): W
    Three New Pupfish Species, Cyprinodon (Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae), from Chihuahua, México, and Arizona, USA Author(s): W. L. Minckley, Robert Rush Miller and Steven Mark Norris Source: Copeia, Vol. 2002, No. 3 (Aug. 15, 2002), pp. 687-705 Published by: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (ASIH) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1448150 . Accessed: 23/07/2014 15:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (ASIH) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Copeia. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.123.44.23 on Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:57:21 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Copeia,2002(3), pp. 687-705 Three New Pupfish Species, Cyprinodon(Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae), from Chihuahua, Mexico, and Arizona, USA W. L. MINCKLEY,ROBERT RUSH MILLER,AND STEVENMARK NORRIS Three new species of Cyprinodon(Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae)are described,each long recognized as distinct. Cyprinodonpisteri occupies a varietyof systems and hab- itats in the Lago de Guzmin complex basin in northern Chihuahua,Mexico. It is distinguishedby its dusky to black dorsal fin and narrowor inconspicuousterminal bar on the caudal fin in mature males.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Amargosa River Pupfish (Cyprinodon Nevadensis Amargosae) in Death Valley National Park, CA
    California Fish and Game 103(3): 91-95; 2017 Distribution of Amargosa River pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis amargosae) in Death Valley National Park, CA KRISTEN G. HUMPHREY, JAMIE B. LEAVITT, WESLEY J. GOLDSMITH, BRIAN R. KESNER, AND PAUL C. MARSH* Native Fish Lab at Marsh & Associates, LLC, 5016 South Ash Avenue, Suite 108, Tempe, AZ 85282, USA (KGH, JBL, WJG, BRK, PCM). *correspondent: [email protected] Key words: Amargosa River pupfish, Death Valley National Park, distribution, endangered species, monitoring, intermittent streams, range ________________________________________________________________________ Amargosa River pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis amargosae), is one of six rec- ognized subspecies of Amargosa pupfish (Miller 1948) and survives in waters embedded in a uniquely harsh environment, the arid and hot Mojave Desert (Jaeger 1957). All are endemic to the Amargosa River basin of southern California and Nevada (Moyle 2002). Differing from other spring-dwelling subspecies of Amargosa pupfish (Cyprinodon ne- vadensis), Amargosa River pupfish is riverine and the most widely distributed, the extent of which has been underrepresented prior to this study (Moyle et al. 2015). Originating on Pahute Mesa, Nye County, Nevada, the Amargosa River flows intermittently, often under- ground, south past the towns of Beatty, Shoshone, and Tecopa and through the Amargosa River Canyon before turning north into Death Valley National Park and terminating at Badwater Basin (Figure 1). Amargosa River pupfish is data deficient with a distribution range that is largely unknown. The species has been documented in Tecopa Bore near Tecopa, Inyo County, CA (Naiman 1976) and in the Amargosa River Canyon, Inyo and San Bernardino Counties, CA (Williams-Deacon et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extinction of the Catarina Pupfish Megupsilon Aporus and the Implications for the Conservation of Freshwater Fish in Mexico
    The extinction of the Catarina pupfish Megupsilon aporus and the implications for the conservation of freshwater fish in Mexico A RCADIO V ALDÉS G ONZÁLEZ,LOURDES M ARTÍNEZ E STÉVEZ M A .ELENA Á NGELES V ILLEDA and G ERARDO C EBALLOS Abstract Extinctions are occurring at an unprecedented ; Régnier et al., ). Since the start of the st century it rate as a consequence of human activities. Vertebrates con- has become clear that population depletion and extinction stitute the best-known group of animals, and thus the group of both freshwater and marine fishes is a severe and wide- for which there are more accurate estimates of extinctions. spread problem (e.g. Ricciardi & Rasmussen, ; Myers Among them, freshwater fishes are particularly threatened &Worm,; Olden et al., ; Burkhead, ). and many species are declining. Here we report the extinc- Extinction of freshwater fishes has been relatively well tion of an endemic freshwater fish of Mexico, the Catarina documented in North America (e.g. Miller et al., ; pupfish Megupsilon aporus, the sole species of the genus Burkhead, ). A compilation of the conservation status Megupsilon. We present a synopsis of the discovery and de- of freshwater fishes in Mexico has revealed that species scription of the species, the threats to, and degradation of, its have become extinct in the wild or have been extirpated habitat, and the efforts to maintain the species in captivity from the country, and . (% of all species in before it became extinct in . The loss of the Catarina Mexico) are facing extinction (IUCN, ; Ceballos et al., pupfish has evolutionary and ecological implications, and b; Table ).
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(S): Noel M
    Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(s): Noel M. Burkhead Source: BioScience, 62(9):798-808. 2012. Published By: American Institute of Biological Sciences URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.5 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Articles Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 NOEL M. BURKHEAD Widespread evidence shows that the modern rates of extinction in many plants and animals exceed background rates in the fossil record. In the present article, I investigate this issue with regard to North American freshwater fishes. From 1898 to 2006, 57 taxa became extinct, and three distinct populations were extirpated from the continent. Since 1989, the numbers of extinct North American fishes have increased by 25%. From the end of the nineteenth century to the present, modern extinctions varied by decade but significantly increased after 1950 (post-1950s mean = 7.5 extinct taxa per decade).
    [Show full text]
  • White Sands Department of the Interior White Sands National Monument
    National Park Service White Sands Department of the Interior White Sands National Monument Common Animal Species List NPS Photo/© Sally King Sally Photo/© NPS hite Sands National Monument is home to over 500 different animal Wspecies. Despite the harsh environment of the dunefield, these incredible creatures have learned to adapt and survive in this southern New Mexico desert. While many of these animals are nocturnal, there are still signs of their activity well into the daylight hours. Keep your eyes open and watch for evidence of the many animal species, both large and small, that call White Sands their home. Amphibians Commonly Seen: 6 Species Great Plains Toad Spadefoot Toads (three species) Reptiles Commonly Seen: 26 Species Lizards Snakes Bleached Earless Lizard Plains Blackhead Snake Collared Lizard Prarie Rattlesnake Desert Spiny Lizard Sonora Gopher Snake Horned Lizard (two species) Western Coachwhip Snake Little Striped Whiptail Lizard Western Diamondback Snake Long-nosed Leopard Lizard New Mexico Whiptail Lizard Southern Prarie Lizard Mammals Commonly Seen: 44 Species Apache Pocket Mouse Grey Fox Badger Kit Fox Blacktail Jackrabbit Kangaroo Rat Bobcat Oryx (African) Coyote Pallid Bat Deer Mouse Porcupine Desert Cottontail White-footed Mouse Desert Pocket Gopher Woodrat (three species) Fish White Sands Pupfish 1 Species Invertebrates Commonly Seen: 500+ Species Black Widow Nevada Buck Moth Caterpillar 100+ Families Camel Cricket Tarantula 12 Orders Carpenter Bee Tarantula Hawk Wasp Darkling Beetle White-Lined Sphinx Moth To learn more about White Sands, visit http://www.nps.gov/whsa The Mexican spadefoot toad is the breed and feed on insects. These official state amphibian of New amphibians lay eggs in the pools of Mexico and gets its name from the water that form during this rainy distinctive spade-like projections season.
    [Show full text]
  • Compare and Contrast the Water Environment Between Death Valley Pupfish Specie and Devil’S Hole Pupfish Specie
    Compare and Contrast the Water environment between Death Valley Pupfish Specie and Devil’s Hole Pupfish Specie By Roy Tianran Gao 1 Table of Contents Title page 1 Abstract 3 Introduction and Background 3 Water Temperature 4 Salinity 6 Water Level 7 Conservation 10 Conclusion 11 References 12 2 ABSTRACT The two types of pupfish (Cyprinodon) in Death Valley National Park are Death Valley pupfish and Devil’s Hole pupfish. Death Valley pupfish has been existed over 10,000 years and Devil’s Hole pupfish has been existed for over 20,000 years. Both of the pupfishes are endangered species. The average number of Death Valley pupfish has decreased by about 100 since 1990s, and the number of Devil’s Hole pupfish has decreased by 400 since 1995. Comparing the water level, water temperature and the water salinity between the two species of pupfish would help to define the living requirements and reason of decreasing population. The research toward the result is based on 7 journal articles, 4 websites, and 1 book. As the result shows, Death Valley Pupfish and Devil’s Hole Pupfish live in different water environments and functioned differently. Understanding the water environment of the two types of pupfishes will help people building new habitats for pupfishes and increase their population so that would be possible to avoid the extinction of pupfishes from the earth. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Pupfish is a small killifish in the Southwest of America. There are five pupfish species in Death Valley which are Armargosa pupfish, Saratoga Pupfish, Devil’s Hole pupfish, Death Valley pupfish, and Cotton ball Marsh pupfish (National Park Service, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • The Endangered White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodon Tularosa)
    The Endangered White Sands pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa) genome reveals low diversity and heterogenous patterns of differentiation Andrew Black1, Janna Willoughby2, Anna Br¨uniche-Olsen3, Brian Pierce4, and Andrew DeWoody1 1Purdue University 2Auburn University 3University of Copenhagen 4Texas A and M University College Station November 24, 2020 Abstract The White Sands pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa), endemic to New Mexico in Southwestern North America, is of conservation concern due in part to invasive species, chemical pollution, and groundwater withdrawal. Herein, we developed a high quality draft reference genome and use it to provide biological insights into the evolution and conservation of C. tularosa. Specifically, we localized microsatellite markers previously used to demarcate Evolutionary Significant Units, evaluated the possibility of introgression into the C. tularosa genome, and compared genomic diversity among related species. The de novo assembly of PacBio Sequel II error-corrected reads resulted in a 1.08Gb draft genome with a contig N50 of 1.4Mb and 25,260 annotated protein coding genes, including 95% of the expected Actinopterigii conserved orthologs. Many of the previously described C. tularosa microsatellite markers fell within or near genes and exhibited a pattern of increased heterozygosity near genic areas compared to those in intergenic regions. Genetic distances between C. tularosa and the widespread invasive species C. variegatus, which diverged ~1.6-4.7 MYA, were 0.027 (nuclear) and 0.022 (mitochondrial). Nuclear alignments revealed putative tracts of introgression that merit further investigation. Genome-wide heterozygosity was markedly lower in C. tularosa compared to estimates from related species, likely because of smaller long-term effective population sizes constrained by their isolated and limited habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • 10842 Federal Fhgister / Vol. 51, No. 61 / Monday, March 31, 1988 / Rules and Regulations
    10842 Federal Fhgister / Vol. 51, No. 61 / Monday, March 31, 1988 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE JNTERJOR Fish and Wildlife Ssrviw 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatensd Wildllfe and plant% Detsm&mtion of Endangered Status end Crltkal Habitat for the Desefi Pupfish AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTNN Final ruie. SUMMARY The Service,determines the desert pupfish [Cyprinodon macuiarius] to be an endangered species. Critical habitat is also designated for this species in Imperial County, California, and Pima County, Arizona. Viable, self- Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 61 / Monday, March 31, 1986 / Rules and Regulations 10843 /- sustaining populations of desert pupfish wetland San Sebastian Marsh, Imperial New Mexico. These fish were obtained are now believed to exist in only two of County, and Salt, Creek. Riverside from Santa Clara Slgugh. They are being the historic habitats in the United County) and a few shoreline pools and maintained in that facility for use in States. The remaining populations in irrigation drains along the Salton Sea in research and for future reintroduction Mexico are also reported to be declining Imperial and Riverside Counties. In efforts in Arizona. or vulnerable. The surviving natural Arizona, it still inhabits Quitobaquito Desert pupfish-were recently populations are impacted by Spring within the Organ Pipe Cactus introduced into one natural and two competition from exotic fishes for food National Monument in Pima County. manmade spring habitats on Bureau of and space, predation by exotic fishes, The species is also believed to inhabit Land Management (BLM) land in water pollution, ground-water pumping, the Colorado River system in the Rio Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Cyprinodontid Fishes of the World
    Archive ofIran. SID J. Ichthyol. (March 2018), 5(1): 1–29 Received: January 5, 2018 © 2018 Iranian Society of Ichthyology Accepted: March 1, 2018 P-ISSN: 2383-1561; E-ISSN: 2383-0964 doi: 10.22034/iji.v5i1.267 http://www.ijichthyol.org Review Article Cyprinodontid fishes of the world: an updated list of taxonomy, distribution and conservation status (Teleostei: Cyprinodontoidea) Hamid Reza ESMAEILI1*, Tayebeh ASRAR1, Ali GHOLAMIFARD2 1Ichthyology and Molecular Systematics Research Laboratory, Zoology Section, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Lorestan University, 6815144316 Khorramabad, Iran. Email: [email protected] Abstract: This checklist aims to list all the reported cyprinodontid fishes (superfamily Cyprinodontoidea/pupfishes) of the world. It lists 141 species in 8 genera and 4 families. The most diverse family is Cyprinodontidae (54 species, 38%), followed by Orestiidae (45 species, 32%), Aphaniidae (39 species, 28%), and Cubanichthyidae (3 species, 2%). Among 141 listed species, 73 (51.8%) species are Not Evaluated (NE), 15 (10.6%) Least Concern (LC), 9 (6.4%) Vulnerable (VU), 3 (2.1%) Data Deficient (DD), 11 (7.8%) Critically Endangered (CR), 4 (2.8%) Near Threatened (NT), 18 (12.8%) Endangered (EN), 3 (2.1%) Extinct in the Wild (EW) and 5 (3.5%) Extinct of the Red List of IUCN. They inhabit in the fresh, brackish and marine waters of the United States, Middle America, the West Indies, parts of northern South America, North Africa, the Mediterranean Anatolian region, coastal areas of the Persian Gulf and Makran Sea (Oman Sea), the northern Arabian Sea east to Gujarat in India, and some endorheic basins of Iran, Pakistan and the Arabian Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Owens Pupfish (Cyprinodon Radiosus) 5-Year Review
    Owens Pupfish (Cyprinodon radiosus) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo by Billy Perry, CSUMB U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office Ventura, California January 2009 5-YEAR REVIEW Owens Pupfish (Cyprinodon radiosus) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]