Safeguarding Democracy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Safeguarding Democracy Freedom.Respect.Equality.Dignity. Action Safeguarding Democracy FEBRUARY 2016 | WWW.HRLC.ORG.AU Democracy relies on many Contact foundations for its success Emily Howie and Hugh de Kretser including an active civil Human Rights Law Centre Ltd Level 17, 461 Bourke Street society, a free press, informed Melbourne VIC 3000 and diverse public debate, Telephone protest rights and the checks + 61 3 8636 4450 and balances provided by Fax courts and other institutions. + 61 3 8636 4455 This report documents a Email [email protected] clear and disturbing trend [email protected] of new laws and practices Web that are eroding these vital www.hrlc.org.au foundations of Australia’s Follow us democracy. Importantly, it http://twitter.com/rightsagenda also outlines a way forward to Join us www.facebook.com/pages/ safeguard our democracy. HumanRightsLawResourceCentre Human Rights Law Centre The Human Rights Law Centre protects and promotes human rights in Australia and beyond through a strategic mix of legal action, advocacy, research and capacity building. It is an independent and not-for-profit organisation and donations are tax-deductible. Executive Summary Threats to press freedom page 2 3 and whistleblowers page 24 The importance of free press and free speech to democracy 25 Recommendations page 8 Intensifying government secrecy 25 Border Force Act 26 ASIO secrecy provisions 27 Strengthening the community sector 8 Attacks on whistleblowers 28 Protest rights 9 Other issues 30 Press freedom and whistleblowers 9 The Australian Human Rights Commission and other watchdog institutions 10 Attacks on the Australian Rule of law 10 4 Human Rights Commission page 32 Human Rights Act 10 The Australian Human Rights Commission’s role 33 Silencing the Hand-picked Commissioners and funding cuts 33 1 community sector Unprecedented political attacks 33 page 12 Ensuring the Commission’s effectiveness 34 Other institutions 34 The vital contribution of advocacy by community organisations 13 Silencing community organisations 14 Undermining the rule of law Cutting funding to community organisations that page 36 advocate 14 5 Changing funding agreements to silence community organisations 15 The rule of law 37 Stopping advocacy by community legal centres 15 Removing court oversight of government decisions 37 Attacks on advocacy by environmental organisations 16 Blocking environmental organisations’ access Creating an enabling environment for community to the courts 38 sector advocacy 17 Vilifying public interest litigation: “vigilante litigation” and legal “rackets” 38 Expanding access to the courts for public Limiting freedom to interest litigation: standing and costs 39 2 protest in Australia page 20 Methodology and acknowledgements Protest is an important part of Australian democracy 21 page 41 Australian police already have broad powers to manage protests 21 Tasmanian and Western Australian anti-protest laws 21 Crackdown on protest for Brisbane’s G20 summit 22 Victoria’s move-on powers 22 Executive Summary The enduring success of Australia’s democracy rests on nation’s human rights watchdog, that were created to many vital foundations including a free press, informed keep them in check. and diverse debate, the rule of law, free and fair elec- The success of Australia’s democracy relies on much tions, active civil society and the checks and balances more than the ability of adults to cast a free vote on provided by courts and other institutions. Yet, despite election day. For our democracy to thrive, we need free Australia’s strong democratic history, there is a clear speech, the free flow of information and a free press to and disturbing trend of new laws and practices eroding hold government accountable and to inform peoples’ many of these foundations. voting decisions. We need to be able to organise and Federal and state governments have stepped up ef- protest on issues that concern us. We need an environ- forts to avoid scrutiny, reduce transparency and limit ment in which civil society can effectively participate. accountability in order to expand government power, We need institutions, organisations and practices to advantage political elites and advance the interests of prevent and expose misconduct and abuse of power; to business. Governments are using a range of funding ensure that government and elected representatives act levers to stifle advocacy by non-government organisa- in the best interests of the Australian public instead of tions that represent vulnerable minorities. Environ- prioritising powerful business and political interests; mental groups who challenge the fossil fuel industry and to ensure that the interests of vulnerable minority are facing threats to their financial viability though at- groups are represented in policy debates. tempts to remove their charity tax concessions. A num- These are not only our human rights but they are ber of states have enacted excessive and unnecessary vital preconditions to the health and prosperity of our anti-protest laws that prioritise business and political democracy and our nation. interests over protest rights. We must arrest this trend that is eroding many of Whistleblowers who expose even the most serious the vital foundations of our democracy and we must human rights abuses against children now face unprec- strengthen these foundations. This report outlines a edented risks of reprisals including prosecution and jail. way forward. Press freedom is being eroded by new laws and policies jeopardising journalists’ ability to maintain the confi- dentiality of sources and to report on matters of public interest. All the while, in critical areas governments are undermining or sidelining the courts and institutions like the Australian Human Rights Commission, the 2 shared opinions. Freedom of association allows for a Australia’s vibrant civil society that can come together to broaden democratic progress political impact, particularly for minority or less power- ful groups in our society. Australia has a strong, if uneven, democratic history Our independent courts and basic rule of law princi- that has played a key role in generating the prosper- ples provide vital accountability, allowing citizens and ity and safety many Australians enjoy today. Many of organisations to ensure government complies with the components of Australia’s democratic success have the law. Institutions like the Australian Human Rights been developed over decades, even centuries. Reform Commission help to prevent and address human rights has been ongoing and progress has been hard won. AUSTRALIAN CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: JAMES THOMAS PHOTOGRAPHY THOMAS JAMES FOUNDATION: AUSTRALIAN CONSERVATION violations and ensure proper government conduct. In the 19th and early 20th century, Australian men were the first in the British colonies to vote without holding property. We pioneered the secret ballot; a pri- vate vote that protected voters from the undue influence Civil society has been of their landlords and employers. South Australia was vital to our democratic the first place in the world where women were allowed to vote and to stand for parliament. success At Federation, the Australian Senate was the first One of Australia’s greatest achievements has been the upper house of parliament in the world to be directly strength of the community sector and civil society elected by the people and our members of parliament more broadly to act as a counterweight to the power of were paid, opening up the opportunity for working government and business interests. Australian govern- class men to hold office. Voting rights for women across ments have generally fostered a positive environment Australia followed but it took until 1965 for all Aborigi- for community organisations to operate. This has nal and Torres Strait Islander adults to be able to vote allowed a balance between the majoritarian interests of across Australia. government, the economic interests of business and the Reform has always been driven by the hard work more people-centred approach of community organi- and courage of movements of people who believed in sations who represent the voices and experiences of equality, human rights and fairness, often in the face minority, marginalised and disadvantaged groups. of staunch opposition from entrenched and powerful Australia’s success owes much to the activism and political and business interests. Those movements re- engagement of Australia’s community sector and civil main critical to allowing our democracy to survive and society. Behind many of the rights, laws and policies thrive. we now enjoy and often take for granted, lie years and sometimes decades of hard work – campaigning, organ- ising and advocating to raise awareness of problems The success of and to push for reform. From the efforts of unions to secure the eight-hour day and workplace safety laws; Australia’s modern to the work of environmental groups protecting the democracy rests on Franklin River and ending whaling in Australia; and the advances secured by community advocates on dis- many strong foundations ability rights, family violence, consumer protection and While periodic elections provide the fundamental ac- much more - the activism of community organisations countability mechanism for government, a network of and civil society has been integral in ensuring that fair- complementary checks and balances is needed not only ness guides Australia’s progress. to protect our modern democracy but to ensure that it Community organisations today
Recommended publications
  • [email protected]
    12 May 2017 Committee Secretary Select Committee on Strengthening Multiculturalism Department of the Senate PO Box 6100 Canberra ACT 2600 [email protected] Edmund Rice Centre submission to Senate Select Committee on Strengthening Multiculturalism The Edmund Rice Centre (ERC) is a non-government research and advocacy organisation working with those made poor, to promote liberation from poverty and injustice and to work for change in order to enable a world where the fullness of life is realised. Our vision is of a just world where right relationships ensure that human rights are protected and promoted and social and environmental justice is a reality. We work to promote, protect and defend human rights, social justice and eco-justice through research, community education and awareness raising, advocacy and partnership building. We welcome the opportunity to make a submission to this Inquiry. Contact Dominic Ofner Coordinator of Development, Promotions and Campaigns Edmund Rice Centre 15 Henley Road Homebush West NSW 2140 Date 12 May 2017 15 Henley Road Edmund Rice Centre for Phone: (02) 8762-4200 (LPO Box 2219) Justice and Community Fax : (02) 8762-4220 Homebush West NSW 2140 Education Email: [email protected] ABN 64 066 939 786 Web: www.erc.org.au Introduction For millennia, diverse nations of Indigenous Australians cared for the land, developing sophisticated systems of culture, governance, environmental management and spirituality. However, since 1788 Indigenous Australians have been treated harshly by non-Indigenous arrivals. Indeed, the Report of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody detailed the immediate violence inflicted towards Indigenous Australians by the British upon the arrival of the First Fleet - “Different styles of violence and techniques of subduing Aboriginal people were employed.
    [Show full text]
  • Landhow Conservative Politics Destroyed Australia's 44Th Parliament
    NEGATIVE LANDHow conservative politics destroyed Australia’s 44th Parliament To order more copies of this great book: newpolitics.com.au/nl-order To purchase the e-book for Kindle: newpolitics.com.au/nl-kindle Like or don’t like the book? To post a review on Amazon: newpolitics.com.au/nl-amazon Negativeland: How conservative politics destroyed Australia’s 44th parliament ISBN: 978-0-9942154-0-6 ©2017 Eddy Jokovich @EddyJokovich Published by New Politics Coverhttp://www.seeklogo.net design: Madeleine Preston New Politics PO Box 1265, Darlinghurst NSW 1300 www.newpolitics.com.au Email: [email protected] National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Jokovich, Eddy, author. Title: Negative land : how conservative politics destroyed Australia’s 44th parliament / Eddy Jokovich. ISBN: 9780994215406 (paperback) Subjects: Essays. Conservatism--Australia. Conservatism in the press--Australia. Australia--Politics and government. Contents BEFORE THE STORM Election 2013: The final countdown ........................................................................5 PARLIAMENT 44 A government not in control of itself .................................................................... 10 Tony Abbott: Bad Prime Minister .............................................................................13 The ‘stop drownings at sea mantra’ cloaks a racist agenda ..................... 20 A very Australian conservative coup ....................................................................26 What is Tony Abbott hiding? .....................................................................................32
    [Show full text]
  • Debunking Dreyfus on Free Speech and Freedom
    Disclaimer : Nothing in this letter should be construed as threatening nor advocating unlawful acts. Suspects are innocent until the facts against them are proven and convicted in a court of justice. This does not discuss the contents of the current super-injunction. Debunking Dreyfus on Free Speech and Freedom Author: Brendan Jones Brisbane, QLD, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Being an Open Letter to ALP Shadow Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus MP QC regarding his speech to the HRC Free Speech 2014 Symposium Cc: Director-General of Security – ASIO, David Irvine (pp. 62-65) Online at: http://victimsofdsto.com/debunking-drefyus/ Page 1 of 66(218) September 10(11), 2014 NoFibs Journalist: “I’m a strong free speech advocate ... So I’m thrilled that shadow Attorney General Mark Dreyfus QC has taken a stand and wish him success in the long hard climb ahead.” 98 Brendan Jones: “Mr. Dreyfus is no advocate for free speech, but the fact that he has convinced you he is – and in just one short speech – has persuaded me he’s a first class barrister.” 98 Journalist Martin Hirst: “I loved that he rubbed their pretty little noses in it. He made the point strongly that the so-called “marketplace of ideas” is a conservative myth that bears little relation to reality.” 98 133 Brendan Jones: “All Dreyfus did was say he rejected it. He never explained why. Google "Sophistry"” 98 131 US Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Cardozo: ‘Freedom of expression is the matrix, the indispensable condition, of nearly every other form of freedom.’ US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis: “Those who won our independence believed that the final end of the State was to make men free to develop their faculties, and that in its government the deliberative forces should prevail over the arbitrary.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Online Journalism
    8748 words. A Chance for Diversity? Australian Online Journalism Axel Bruns ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia [email protected] – http://snurb.info/ – @snurb_dot_info Introduction As it enters the second decade of the new millennium, Australian journalism – and Australian online journalism with it – is experiencing a period of significant disruption. On the one hand, some news organisations and enterprising journalists are actively seeking to explore what ways of reinvigorating the profession may be open to them – not least by drawing on the affordances of a changing media environment that now also includes online, social, and mobile media platforms. On the other hand, however, there remains a significant and at times belligerent resistance to change, especially where that change is likely to lead to a shift in the professional role and public standing of journalists at an individual level, or to the repositioning and restructure of news organisations at an institutional level. The conflict between these two broad positions is played out, at times vocally, between the news organisations and individual journalists representing them, as well as (by proxy) between journalism academics in Australia. The situation in the country is further complicated by “the extraordinary concentration of media ownership in Australia” (Jones & Pusey 2008: 587). Its print, radio, and TV news markets are each controlled by a handful of major nation-wide operators: the newspaper market in most Australian states and territories is dominated by one or two major regional papers, for example, published either by Rupert Murdoch’s News Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Australians' "Right" to Be Bigoted: Protecting Minorities' Rights from the Tyranny of the Majority Jillian Rudge
    Brooklyn Journal of International Law Volume 41 | Issue 2 Article 7 2016 Australians' "Right" to be Bigoted: Protecting Minorities' Rights from the Tyranny of the Majority Jillian Rudge Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Jillian Rudge, Australians' "Right" to be Bigoted: Protecting Minorities' Rights from the Tyranny of the Majority, 41 Brook. J. Int'l L. (2016). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol41/iss2/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. AUSTRALIANS’“RIGHT” TO BE BIGOTED: PROTECTING MINORITIES’ RIGHTS FROM THE TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY The essence of racial vilification is that it encourages disre- spect of others because of their association with the racial group to whom they belong. That kind of stigmatisation and its insidious potential to spread and grow from prejudice to discrimination, from prejudice to violence, or froM prejudice to social exclusion, is at the fundamental core of racial vilifi- cation. In a free and pluralistic society, every citizen is enti- tled to live free of inequality of treatment based upon a denial of dignity.1 INTRODUCTION n March 2014, Australian Attorney-General George Bran- Idis stated in Australian Parliament that, “People have the right to be bigots .
    [Show full text]
  • Speaking Truth: the Play of Politics and Australian Satire
    School of Media, Culture and Creative Arts Department of Communication and Cultural Studies Speaking Truth: The Play of Politics and Australian Satire Rebecca Louise Higgie This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Curtin University October 2013 Declaration To the best of my knowledge and belief this thesis contains no material previously published by any other person except where due acknowledgment has been made. This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university. Signature: …………………………………………. Date: ………………………... Abstract This thesis examines the contemporary interplay between satire and politics, focusing on texts that envisage and engage with politics in unconventional and often mischievous ways. There is a long tradition of scholarship concerned with issues such as satire’s ability to promote subversion, awareness, apathy or even cynicism; the potential, or lack thereof, of satire to influence any change in political or journalistic discourse; and the relationship between satire and “truth,” particularly in satire’s capacity to “speak truth to power.” My research expands on this tradition, asking, how does televisual and online political satire contribute to shifting political discourses? Focusing primarily on the under-researched relationship between satire and Australian politics, this question is considered through textual and discursive analysis. Firstly, I examine the difference between cynicism and its ancient counterpart kynicism in order to illustrate how different types of satire approach the idea of truth and truth-telling. I then explore how the larrikin, the carnivalesque and a cultural “distaste for taste” play an important role in the way satirists are given legitimacy to speak on political issues in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Legal Responses to Foreign Fighters
    Australian legal responses to foreign fighters Keiran Hardy and George Williams* In 2014–2015, the Abbott government introduced new counter-terrorism laws into the Federal Parliament. These laws were portrayed as a response to the threat of foreign fighters returning from Iraq and Syria, and the ongoing problem of home-grown terrorism. The laws also dealt with a wider range of matters, including whistleblowing by intelligence officers and the retention of metadata. This article details these laws with a view to analysing whether they were needed and are likely to be effective, the process by which they were enacted and their impact on democratic and other rights, so that lessons may be drawn more generally for the making of future counter-terrorism laws in Australia. INTRODUCTION Australia faces a significant threat of terrorism from individuals connected with or inspired by Islamic State. From its inception in 2003, the National Terrorism Public Alert System set the threat level to Australia at “medium”, indicating an assessment that a terrorist attack “could occur”.1 In September 2014, this was increased to “high”, indicating that a terrorist attack is “likely”.2 This change reflected the heightened danger posed by “foreign fighters” travelling to Iraq and Syria, joining Islamic State and returning home trained and prepared to engage in terrorism. As of February 2016, around 110 Australians were believed to be fighting in Syria and Iraq, with another 40 having returned home from those conflicts, and another 190 actively supporting Islamic State through financing and recruitment or by seeking to travel overseas to engage in terrorism.3 A further, related threat is posed by young radicalised individuals within Australia who support Islamic State and seek to advance its cause.
    [Show full text]
  • The Systemic Marginalisation of Muslim Australian Voices: to What Extent Can Deliberative Democratic Theory Provide a Response?
    The systemic marginalisation of Muslim Australian voices: To what extent can Deliberative Democratic theory provide a response? Submitted by Georgina Cole ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7492-0182 A thesis in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2017 School of Social and Political Science Faculty of Arts University of Melbourne ii Abstract Muslim communities in Australia are currently facing a number of political and social challenges. One major challenge is the widespread perception that the Australian government’s policy and political discourse concerning terrorism actually targets Muslims. In addition, of all minority groups, Muslim Australians have been disproportionately subjected to psychological and physical hostility by non-Muslim Australians. Compounding these challenges is the lack of genuine public platforms for Muslims to contribute to political discourse, policy-making, and public debate in areas that directly affect them; Muslim Australians are often spoken for and about, but rarely spoken directly to. I argue that these political and social challenges are not and cannot be publicly expressed because of the systemic marginalisation of Muslim Australian voices. Muslim Australian opinions can be ignored, discredited, criticised, and/or publicly deemed “un-Australian” if they are not in accordance with the commonly held attitudes of the government and mainstream society. This thesis critically examines if and how varying interpretations of deliberative democratic theory can be used as a response to the marginalisation of Muslim voices. Through a new configuration of existing critical models applied to a set of normative deliberative principles, I offer a toolkit for deliberation that could increase the influence of Muslim voices in Australian society.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Kurti No Ordinary Garment? the Burqa and the Pursuit of Tolerance
    No Ordinary Garment? The Burqa and the Pursuit of Tolerance Peter Kurti Research Report | June 2015 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data: Creator: Kurti, Peter, author. Title: No ordinary garment : the burqa and the pursuit of tolerance / Peter Kurti. ISBN: 9781922184504 (paperback) Series: Research report (Centre For Independent Studies (Australia)) ; RR 5. Research report (Centre For Independent Studies (Australia). Online); RR 5. Subjects: Religious tolerance--Australia. Toleration--Australia. Burqas (Islamic clothing)--Australia. Hijab (Islamic clothing)--Australia. Other Creators/Contributors: Centre for Independent Studies (Australia), issuing body. Dewey Number: 323.4420994 No Ordinary Garment? The Burqa and the Pursuit of Tolerance Peter Kurti Research Report 5 Related CIS publications Policy Monographs PM139 Peter Kurti, The Forgotten Freedom: Threats to Religious Liberty in Australia (2014) PM138 Peter Kurti, Multiculturalism and the Fetish of Diversity (2013) Contents Executive Summary ...............................................................................................1 Introduction: Can the Secular-Religious Compact Hold? ..............................................3 Multiculturalism, Identity Politics, and Threats to Religious Liberty ................................5 No limits on religious liberty? ..................................................................................6 De-coding the Burqa ..............................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Politics in a Digital Age
    Australian Politics in a Digital Age Peter John Chen Australian Politics in a Digital Age Peter John Chen Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Chen, Peter John. Title: Australian politics in a digital age / Peter John Chen. ISBN: 9781922144393 (pbk.) 9781922144409 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Information technology--Political aspects--Australia. Information technology--Social aspects--Australia. Internet--Political aspects--Australia. Information society--Social aspects--Australia. Communication--Political aspects--Australia. Dewey Number: 303.48330994 All rights reserved. Conditions of use of this volume can be viewed at the ANU E Press website. Cover image: Jonathon Chapman, Typographic Papercut Lampshade, http://www.flickr.com/ photos/jonathan_chapman1986/4004884667 Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2013 ANU E Press Contents List of illustrations . vii List of figures . ix List of tables . xi About the author . xiii Acknowledgements . xv Acronyms and jargon . .. xvii Chapter 1 — Contextualising our digital age . 1 Chapter 2 — Obama-o-rama? . 17 Chapter 3 — Social media . 69 Chapter 4 — Anti-social media . 113 Chapter 5 — All your base . 135 Chapter 6 — Elite digital media and digital media elites . 161 Chapter 7 — Policy in an age of information
    [Show full text]
  • Referendums Why Are They Held? When Are They Justified?
    Referendums Why Are They Held? When Are They Justified? Susan C. Stokes University of Chicago Chicago Center on Democracy February 5, 2020 Prepared for presentation at the Political Economy Lunch Group Seminar Series and the Comparative Politics Speaker Series, University of California, San Diego. This paper is an early part of a book-length project and draws on collaborations with Eli Rau, Radha Sarkar, and Shahana Sheik, as well as on interviews and conversations with Chiara Cordelli, Brian Galligan, Aziz Huq, Richard Huzzey, Demetra Kasimis, Kevin Kromash, Zhaotian Luo, John McCormick, Luís Fernando Medina, Sir Geoffrey Palmer, Steve Pincus, John Uhr, and Jack Vowles. A note on usage: I follow Butler and Ranney (1994), who in turn follow the Oxford English Dictionary, in using the term referendums rather than referenda as the plural of referendum. Referenda are “things referred to.” 1 On the evening of June 23, 2016, as news arrived from across the Atlantic that the U.K. had voted to leave the European Union, a neighbor had a pithy post on Facebook: “Referendums are stupid.”1 A few days later, another friend and neighbor said about Brexit, “I can’t believe they put that question on the ballot.” Both of these women were politically well-informed faculty members at Yale, distinguished scholars in humanities fields. They were expressing quite different views about referendums. One saw the very institution as flawed. The other implied that there some matters of public policy on which the public should decide, directly, and others on which they should not. The question I seek to answer in this project is, Which view is closer to the truth? Contemporary political theorists have tended to view popular consultations – initiatives, plebiscites, and referendums – favorably, seeing them as moments of direct democracy that elevate citizen participation and choice (see, e.g., Barber 1984, Budge 1996).
    [Show full text]