Acropora Endangered Species Act Listing Workshop

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Acropora Endangered Species Act Listing Workshop Proceedings of the Caribbean Acropora Workshop: Potential Application of the U.S. Endangered Species Act as a Conservation Strategy April 16-18, 2002 Miami, Florida Andrew W. Bruckner U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-24 January 2003 This publication should be cited as: Bruckner, A.W. , 2002. Proceedings of the Caribbean Acropora Workshop: Potential Application of the U.S. Endangered Species Act as a Conservation Strategy. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-24, Silver Spring, MD 199 pp. Significant support for the development of this document was provided by NOAA Fisheries, Office of Protected Resources and Office of Habitat Conservation’s Coral Conservation Program. The views expressed in this document are those of the author and the participants of the workshop, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Government, NOAA or DOS. Additional copies of this publication may be requested from: Dr. Andrew W. Bruckner National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources 1315 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Proceedings of the Caribbean Acropora Workshop: Potential Application of the U.S. Endangered Species Act as a Conservation Strategy Andrew W. Bruckner Office of Protected Resources, Rm 13604 NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-24 January 2003 U.S. Department of Commerce Donald L. Evans, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., USN (Ret.) Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere National Marine Fisheries Service William T. Hogarth, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Proceedings of the Caribbean Acropora Workshop: Potential Application of the U.S. Endangered Species Act as a Conservation Strategy Program Coordinator Andrew Bruckner, NOAA Fisheries Organizing Committee Andrew Bruckner, NOAA Fisheries, Headquarters Margaret Miller, NOAA Fisheries, SEFSC Robin Fortuna, NCORE Cara Dickman, NCORE Workshop Group Leaders Brian Keller, NOAA Sanctuaries Patricia Kramer, AGRRA Diego Lirman, University of Miami John McManus, NCORE Sponsors Office of Protected Resources NOAA Fisheries Silver Spring, MD Office of Habitat Conservation NOAA Fisheries Silver Spring, MD Southeast Fishery Science Center NOAA Fisheries Miami, FL National Center for Caribbean Coral Reef Research Miami, FL ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Proceedings of the Caribbean Acropora Workshop summarizes the outcome of a meeting held in Miami, Florida in April, 2002, funded through the NOAA Coral Conservation Program with additional financial support by NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources, Office of Habitat Conservation and the Southeast Fisheries Science Center. The workshop was developed and conducted in response to the listing of elkhorn coral and staghorn coral as Candidate Species for the Endangered Species Act (ESA) with the primary objective of obtaining recent information on the status and trends of these corals throughout the wider Caribbean and the severity of threats affecting them. This information is needed to complete a status review of these species, which will be used to determine whether these species qualify for listing on the ESA as threatened or endangered. The workshop objectives and the working group tasks were developed by Andrew Bruckner and Margaret Miller through consultations with key Acropora biologists, State, Territorial and Federal Wildlife Agencies, as well as ESA experts at the NOAA Fisheries Headquarters Office and the NOAA Fisheries Southeast Regional Office (SERO). The workshop and this document would not have been possible without the dedicated efforts of all of the participants and in particular, the Working Group Chairs, including Dr. Brain Keller, Ms. Patricia Kramer, Dr. Diego Lirman, and Dr. John McManus. The success of the workshop is also due in part to the National Center for Caribbean Coral Reef Research (NCORE) including Cara Dickman, Robin Fortuna and several graduate students who provided facilities, coordinated all logistics, and ensured that the speakers and participants had all necessary equipment and supplies used during the workshop. I am deeply indebted to the numerous experts from Florida, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, including 1) Margaret Miller, Walt Jaap, Mark Chiappone, Bernardo Varga-Angel, Brian Keller, Rich Aronson and Eugene Shinn (Florida); 2) Ernesto Weil, Edwin Hernandez-Delgado, Antonio Ortiz, Michael Nemith and Hector Ruiz (Puerto Rico) ; and 3) Caroline Rogers, William Gladfelter, Dennis Hubbard, Elizabeth Gladfelter, John Bythell, Rikki Dunsmore, Christy Loomis, Barry Devine, Zandy Hillis-Starr, and Brendalee Phillips (U.S. Virgin Islands) for their efforts in developing white papers on the status, trends, threats, and patterns of recovery of Acropora populations in their respective areas. I would also like to acknowledge each of the speakers, without whom much of the key background information on these corals would not have been included in the working group reports. I am also grateful for the contributions by Dr. Eric Jordan-Dahlgren and Dr. Steve Vollmer, who were unable to attend, but still provided important information that contributed to the workshop goals. Finally, I am grateful to each of the participants for all of their efforts and contributions to the working group reports, as well as the final edits and revisions which have greatly improved this document. i i i PREFACE The Caribbean Acropora Workshop was conceived to obtain recent information on the status of Acropora populations throughout the wider Caribbean and determine appropriate strategies to conserve these critical resources. Because the emphasis was on the potential use of the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) as a conservation tool, the majority of the participants were from the United States, including fisheries officials, resource managers and scientists from Federal, State and Territorial governments, universities and non- government organizations. Scientific and management expertise from a number of other countries were also represented to obtain a more regional perspective, as a determination of an endangered or threatened listing in the U.S. ESA for invertebrates requires an evaluation of the status, trends and threats affecting these species throughout their range. The workshop was divided into background presentations given by the participants followed by two days of working group discussions. Presentations were given on the status and trends, threats, and biology and ecology of Acropora cervicornis and A. palmata1; the application of research data to improve our understanding of these species; and existing and new management tools necessary to develop effective conservation programs for these species. The morning session included a regional overview as well as more detailed presentations on Acropora populations in Florida, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and several non-U.S. countries including the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Belize, Netherlands Antilles, Colombia and the northeast Caribbean. The afternoon session discussed mapping of Acropora habitat and colonies, the relevance of geological information in evaluating risk factors, population dynamics and life history traits, genetic information, the use of aquaculture and mariculture to restore degraded populations, existing management measures, and potential application of the ESA as a conservation strategy. This was followed by four concurrent breakout working group sessions on 1) status and trends of Acropora populations throughout the Caribbean; 2) biology and ecology of Acropora spp. and how these influence the potential for recovery; 3) existing management measures in the U.S. and wider Caribbean and their relevance to Acropora conservation, and new initiatives needed to protect these species; and 4) information and research needs to better understand and address the threats these species face, and predict the likelihood of recovery. This document includes four working group reports, white papers from Florida, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, abstracts from the talks, restoration approaches applied to these corals, background information used to list these species as Candidates for the ESA, and a reference compilation of literature specific for Caribbean Acroporids. The Executive Summary highlights the major outcomes and conclusions from the workshop, including the specific resolutions of each working group. These Proceedings should provide the information needed to complete a full status review on these species and make a listing determination for the ESA. 1Acropora prolifera is mentioned in several reports and abstracts throughout these proceedings, but it was not listed as a candidate species for the ESA and was not considered a separate species during this workshop. Vollmer and Palumbi (2002) present data that demonstrate that A. prolifera is a morphologically variable, first generation hybrid of A. palmata and A. cervicornis. i v TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Resolutions from the Biology and Ecology Working Group ....................................... 5 Summary of Resolutions from the Status and Trends Working Group ..........................................
Recommended publications
  • Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E. Hepner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hepner, Megan E., "Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by Megan E. Hepner A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine Science with a concentration in Marine Resource Assessment College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Frank Muller-Karger, Ph.D. Christopher Stallings, Ph.D. Steve Gittings, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 31st, 2017 Keywords: Species richness, biodiversity, functional diversity, species traits Copyright © 2017, Megan E. Hepner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major advisor, Dr. Frank Muller-Karger, who provided opportunities for me to strengthen my skills as a researcher on research cruises, dive surveys, and in the laboratory, and as a communicator through oral and presentations at conferences, and for encouraging my participation as a full team member in various meetings of the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and other science meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTEMBER 6, 2021 Delmarracing.Com
    21DLM002_SummerProgramCover_ Trim_4.125x8.625__Bleed_4.375x8.875 HOME OF THE 2021 BREEDERS’ CUP JULY 16 - SEPTEMBER 6, 2021 DelMarRacing.com 21DLM002_Summer Program Cover.indd 1 6/10/21 2:00 PM DEL MAR THOROUGHBRED CLUB Racing 31 Days • July 16 - September 6, 2021 Day 8 • Friday July 30, 2021 First Post 4:00 p.m. These are the moments that make history. Where the Turf Meets the Surf Keeneland sales graduates have won Del Mar racetrack opened its doors (and its betting six editions of the Pacific Classic over windows) on July 3, 1937. Since then it’s become West the last decade. Coast racing’s summer destination where avid fans and newcomers to the sport enjoy the beauty and excitement of Thoroughbred racing in a gorgeous seaside setting. CHANGES AND RESULTS Courtesy of Equibase Del Mar Changes, live odds, results and race replays at your ngertips. Dmtc.com/app for iPhone or Android or visit dmtc.com NOTICE TO CUSTOMERS Federal law requires that customers for certain transactions be identi ed by name, address, government-issued identi cation and other relevant information. Therefore, customers may be asked to provide information and identi cation to comply with the law. www.msb.gov PROGRAM ERRORS Every effort is made to avoid mistakes in the of cial program, but Del Mar Thoroughbred Club assumes no liability to anyone for Beholder errors that may occur. 2016 Pacific CHECK YOUR TICKET AND MONIES BEFORE Classic S. (G1) CONFIRMING WAGER. MANAGEMENT ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBLITY FOR TRANSACTIONS NOT COMPLETED WHEN WAGERING CLOSES. POST TIMES Post times for today’s on-track and imported races appear on the following page.
    [Show full text]
  • Socan Monitoring Workshop
    SOCAN MONITORING WORKSHOP Image credit: Lauren Valentino, NOAA/AOML 2/28/17 WorksHop Report SOCAN MONITORING WORKSHOP SOCAN MONITORING WORKSHOP IDENTIFYING PRIORITY LOCATIONS FOR OCEAN ACIDIFICATION MONITORING IN THE U.S. SOUTHEAST SUMMARY The Southeast Ocean and Coastal Acidification Network (SOCAN) held a worksHop in CHarleston, SoutH Carolina to facilitate discussion on priority locations for ocean acidification monitoring in tHe SoutHeast. The discussion included identification of key gradients in physical, chemical and biological parameters along tHe SoutHeast coast, a review of current monitoring efforts, and an assessment of stakeHolder needs. Sixteen monitoring locations were identified as potential acidification monitoring locations (see page 12). The following three monitoring locations were HigHligHted as priority sites tHat would furtHer our understanding of the chemistry and regional drivers of ocean acidification and address stakeholder needs: (1) Sapelo Island, GA (2) Gulf Stream, offsHore of Gray’s Reef, GA (3) Biscayne National Park, FL The workshop concluded witH a discussion of logistics and opportunities to pursue monitoring at tHe recommended locations. A copy of tHe agenda is included in Appendix 1. PROCEEDINGS Approximately 16 experts gatHered for tHe SOCAN Monitoring Workshop to outline recommendations for priority ocean acidification monitoring locations in tHe SoutHeast (Attendee List, Appendix 2). The worksHop began witH introductory remarks regarding tHe structure and responsibilities of SOCAN and SECOORA. Following the introductory remarks, participants reviewed the proposed agenda; no modifications were made. The first half-day was spent reviewing tHe state of ocean acidification science and regional response. Kim Yates sHared a syntHesis of tHe 2016 SOCAN State of the Science meeting, wHicH included a review of webinars and key findings related to OA chemistry, modeling and organismal response.
    [Show full text]
  • High Clonality in Acropora Palmata and Acropora Cervicornis Populations of Guadeloupe, French Lesser Antilles
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Marine and Freshwater Research Short Communication http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MF14181 High clonality in Acropora palmata and Acropora cervicornis populations of Guadeloupe, French Lesser Antilles A. JapaudA, C. BouchonA, J.-L. ManceauA and C. FauvelotB,C AUMR 7208 BOREA, LabEx CORAIL, Universite´ des Antilles et de la Guyane, BP 592, 97159 Pointe-a`-Pitre, Guadeloupe. BUMR 9220 ENTROPIE, LabEx CORAIL, Centre IRD de Noume´a, 101 Promenade Roger Laroque, BPA5, 98848 Noume´a, New Caledonia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Since the 1980s, population densities of Acroporidae have dramatically declined in the Caribbean Sea. Quantitative censuses of Acroporidae provide information on the number of colonies (i.e. ramets), but not on the number of genetically distinct individuals (i.e. genets). In this context, the aim of our study was to provide an overview of the genetic status of Acropora populations in Guadeloupe by examining the genotypic richness of Acropora palmata and Acropora cervicornis. Using 14 microsatellite loci, we found extremely low genotypic richness for both species from Caye-a`-Dupont reef (i.e. 0.125 for A. palmata and nearly zero for A. cervicornis). Because genetic diversity contributes to the ability of organisms to evolve and adapt to new environmental conditions, our results are alarming in the context of ongoing global warming as long periods of clonal growth without sexual recruitment may lead to the extinction of these populations. Additional keywords: genotypic richness, Acroporidae, microsatellites, Caribbean Sea. Received 27 June 2014, accepted 5 November 2014, published online 19 March 2015 Introduction censuses of acroporid densities report on the number of ramets Stony corals of the Acroporidae (Class Anthozoa, Order Scler- (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic Communities at Two Remote Pacific Coral Reefs: Effects of Reef
    Benthic communities at two remote Pacific coral reefs: eVects of reef habitat, depth, and wave energy gradients on spatial patterns Gareth J. Williams1,7 , Jennifer E. Smith1,7 , Eric J. Conklin2, Jamison M. Gove3,4 , Enric Sala5,6 and Stuart A. Sandin1 1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA 2 The Nature Conservancy, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 3 Coral Reef Ecosystem Division, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, USA 4 Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 5 National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA 6 Centre d’Estudis Avanc¸ats de Blanes (CSIC), Blanes, Spain 7 These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Kingman Reef and Palmyra Atoll in the central Pacific are among the most re- mote coral reefs on the planet. Here we describe spatial patterns in their benthic communities across reef habitats and depths, and consider these in the context of oceanographic gradients. Benthic communities at both locations were dominated by calcifying organisms (54–86% cover), namely hard corals (20–74%) and crustose coralline algae (CCA) (10–36%). While turf algae were relatively common at both locations (8–22%), larger fleshy macroalgae were virtually absent at Kingman (<1%) and rare at Palmyra (0.7–9.3%). Hard coral cover was higher, but with low diversity, in more sheltered habitats such as Palmyra’s backreef and Kingman’s patch reefs. Al- most exclusive dominance by slow-growing Porites on Kingman’s patch reefs provides indirect evidence of competitive exclusion, probably late in a successional sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ Tagging and Tracking of Coral Reef Fishes from the Aquarius Undersea Laboratory
    TECHNICAL NOTE In Situ Tagging and Tracking of Coral Reef Fishes from the Aquarius Undersea Laboratory AUTHORS ABSTRACT James Lindholm We surgically implanted coded-acoustic transmitters in a total of 46 coral reef fish Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary; during a saturation mission to the Aquarius Undersea Laboratory in August 2002. Current address: Pfleger Institute of Aquarius is located within the Conch Reef Research Only Area, a no-take marine re- Environmental Research serve in the northern Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Over the course of 10 Sarah Fangman days, with daily bottom times of 7 hrs, saturation diving operations allowed us to col- Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary lect, surgically tag, release, and subsequently track fishes entirely in situ. Fish were collected using baited traps deployed adjacent to the reef as well as nets manipulated Les Kaufman on the bottom by divers. Surgical implantation of acoustic transmitters was conducted Boston University Marine Program at a mobile surgical station that was moved to different sites across the reef. Each fish Steven Miller was revived from anesthetic and released as divers swam the fish about the reef. Short- National Undersea Research Center, term tracking of tagged fish was conducted by saturation divers, while long-term fish University of North Carolina at Wilmington movement was recorded by a series of acoustic receivers deployed on the seafloor. Though not designed as an explicit comparison with surface tagging operations, the benefits of working entirely in situ were apparent. INTRODUCTION he use of acoustic telemetry to track the movements of marine fishes is now a com- true with deepwater fishes that have air blad- fish with a damp towel.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroforestry: Enhancing Resiliency in U.S
    Southeast and Caribbean Sarah Workman, Becky Barlow, and John Fike Sarah Workman is the associate director of the Highlands Biological Station, University of North Carolina; Becky Barlow is an associate professor, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University; John Fike is an associate professor, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Tech. Description of the Region (fig. A.15). All of these land uses provide significant produc- tivity and income. The Southeast encompasses physiographic Cropland and pastureland occupy significant portions of land provinces, or ecoregions (Wear and Greis 2012), that have area in the Southeastern United States. Forests occupy from 50 unique climate, fire history, and composition of vegetation. to 69 percent of the land within each State in the region From the physiographic province of the Appalachian Mountains Figure A.15. Acres of land­use categories of the 11 Southeastern States. (Map and table prepared by William M. Christie, Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC). Agroforestry: Enhancing Resiliency in U.S. Agricultural Landscapes Under Changing Conditions 189 to the alluvial plains of the Mis sissippi River Basin, within land use outside developed zones is perhaps best viewed in deciduous forests of Kentucky and Tennessee and the Interior terms of the nature of woody plant cover and whether animals Highlands of the Ozarks, to the Piedmont, Flatwoods, and are excluded or allowed access. Both Puerto Rico and the U.S. Coastal Plains, a large portion of the land area is appropriate Virgin Islands are experiencing a trend toward an increase in for implementing several types of agroforestry, integrating woody cover with the loss of agricultural land and pastureland either crops or livestock, or both, with trees and woody (Brandeis and Turner 2013a, 2013b; Brandeis et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Identification of Precious and Semi-Precious Corals in Commercial Trade
    'l'llA FFIC YvALE ,.._,..---...- guide to the identification of precious and semi-precious corals in commercial trade Ernest W.T. Cooper, Susan J. Torntore, Angela S.M. Leung, Tanya Shadbolt and Carolyn Dawe September 2011 © 2011 World Wildlife Fund and TRAFFIC. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-9693730-3-2 Reproduction and distribution for resale by any means photographic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or information storage and retrieval systems of any parts of this book, illustrations or texts is prohibited without prior written consent from World Wildlife Fund (WWF). Reproduction for CITES enforcement or educational and other non-commercial purposes by CITES Authorities and the CITES Secretariat is authorized without prior written permission, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Any reproduction, in full or in part, of this publication must credit WWF and TRAFFIC North America. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF, or the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The designation of geographical entities in this publication and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF, TRAFFIC, or IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership are held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint program of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Cooper, E.W.T., Torntore, S.J., Leung, A.S.M, Shadbolt, T. and Dawe, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusks Background the Florida Keys Marine Ecosystem Supports a Diverse Fauna of Mollusks Belonging to Several Orders
    2010 Quick Look Report: Miller et al. VII. Abundance and Size of Selected Mollusks Background The Florida Keys marine ecosystem supports a diverse fauna of mollusks belonging to several orders. Opisthobranch mollusks, for example, are represented by at least 30 species of sea slugs (Sacoglossa) and 23 species of nudibranchs (Nudibranchia) (Clark and DeFreese 1987; Levy et al. 1996), including at least three endemic species (Clark 1994). Data on the status and trends of mollusk populations and habitat utilization patterns in the Florida Keys, with the exception of queen conch (Strombus gigas), are generally limited (Marcus 1960; Jensen and Clark 1983; Clark and DeFreese 1987), as most previous studies have been qualitative in nature (Clark 1994; Trowbridge 2002). Clark (1994) noted a declining population trend for the lettuce sea slug, Elysia (Tridachia) crispata Mörch (see cladistic analyses in Gosliner 1995; Jensen 1996) in southern Florida, based upon qualitative comparisons of occurrence and population densities between 1969-80 and 1987-93. About 50% of the nearshore populations assessed by Clark (1994) nearly 17 years ago were declining due to habitat destruction, siltation, eutrophication, and over- collection, particularly evident in nearshore habitats. Since 2001, we have conducted intermittent surveys of various gastropod mollusk species in conjunction with assessments of other benthic variables. For example, we encountered unusually high densities of lettuce sea slugs among 63 shallow fore reef sites during June-September 2001. While sacoglossans are not particularly rare in many shallow-water marine habitats where densities correlate with algal biomass (Clarke and DeFreese 1987), our observations offshore were considered unusual because fleshy algal cover tends to be relatively low (Chiappone et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Scleractinian Reef Corals: Identification Notes
    SCLERACTINIAN REEF CORALS: IDENTIFICATION NOTES By JACKIE WOLSTENHOLME James Cook University AUGUST 2004 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24656.51205 http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24656.51205 Scleractinian Reef Corals: Identification Notes by Jackie Wolstenholme is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................ i INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................. 2 FAMILY ACROPORIDAE.................................................................................................................................... 3 Montipora ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Massive/thick plates/encrusting & tuberculae/papillae ................................................................................... 3 Montipora monasteriata .............................................................................................................................. 3 Massive/thick plates/encrusting & papillae ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • FKNMS Lower Region
    se encuentran entre los entre encuentran se Florida la de Cayos los de coralinos arrecifes Los agua. del salinidad la o como los erizos y pepinos de mar. Las hierbas marinas son una base para la crianza del crianza la para base una son marinas hierbas Las mar. de pepinos y erizos los como aves, peces y tortugas que se enredan en ella o la ingieren, confundiéndola con alimentos. con confundiéndola ingieren, la o ella en enredan se que tortugas y peces aves, grados C), ni más cálidas de 86 grados F (30 grados C), ni a cambios pronunciados de la calidad la de pronunciados cambios a ni C), grados (30 F grados 86 de cálidas más ni C), grados atíes y diversos peces, y son el hábitat de organismos marinos filtradores, así como forrajeros, como así filtradores, marinos organismos de hábitat el son y peces, diversos y atíes delicados puede asfixiarlos, romperlos o erosionarlos. La basura puede resultar mortal para las para mortal resultar puede basura La erosionarlos. o romperlos asfixiarlos, puede delicados vivir a la exposición continua de aguas del mar a temperaturas por debajo de los 68 grados F (18 F grados 68 los de debajo por temperaturas a mar del aguas de continua exposición la a vivir ue at motned acdn lmnii.Poocoa lmnoalstrua,man- tortugas, las a alimento Proporcionan alimenticia. cadena la de importante parte tuyen que las aves mueran de hambre. El cordel de pescar y la basura que se enreda en los corales los en enreda se que basura la y pescar de cordel El hambre.
    [Show full text]