DOCSLIB.ORG

A Study of Traditional Use of Birds' Eggs by the Huna

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A STUDY OF TRADITIONAL USE OF BIRDS’ EGGS BY THE HUNA TLINGIT EUGENE S. HUNN DARRYLL R. JOHNSON PRISCILLA N. RUSSELL THOMAS F. THORNTON Technical Report NPS/CCSOUW/NRTR-2002-02 NPS D-113 National Park Service Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit College of Forest Resources Box 352100 Seattle, Washington 98195-2100 i The NPS Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (NPS PNW CESU) is located in the University of Washington (UW) College of Forest Resources. The NPS PNW CESU is part of a larger partnership involving 7 federal agencies, 12 universities and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. The PNW CESU was created in October of 2000 to provide research, technical assistance and education to enhance management of natural and cultural resources on public lands in the Pacific Northwest. The applied social science program associated with the NPS PNW CESU has been operating out of the UW College of Forest Resources since 1970 when it was a part of the Cooperative Park Studies Unit (CPSU). The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Cascadia Field Station (previously known as the USGS University of Washington Field Station) also traces its history to the NPS CPSU established by cooperative agreement between NPS and UW in 1970. In 1997, the CPSU was transferred to the U.S. Geological Survey and administered out of the Biological Resources Division (BRD), Forest Rangeland Ecosystem Center (FRESC) located in Corvallis, Oregon. The mission of FRESC and that of Cascadia Field Station is to work with others to provide the scientific understanding and technologies needed to support the sound management and conservation of our nation’s biological resources. Cascadia Field Station programs are developed to provide the appropriate depth and breadth of objective science to meet the information needs of resource managers who encounter complex environmental problems driven by myriad biological, physical, social, and economic forces. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by NPS, USGS, or any of the other agencies or institutions associated with this research. The contents of the report do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the USGS, NPS or any of the agencies associated with this report. Copies of this Technical Report are available from: Technical Information Center Denver Service Center National Park Service P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Phone: 303-969-2130 Cover Photograph: Seven-year old Phyllis Mills on South Marble Island in 1959. “Mom’s little helper” is holding two gull eggs. Photo courtesy of the Pat Mills family. ii A STUDY OF TRADITIONAL USE OF BIRDS’ EGGS BY THE HUNA TLINGIT EUGENE S. HUNN DARRYLL R. JOHNSON PRISCILLA N. RUSSELL THOMAS F. THORNTON With Assistance by KATHY FALK Technical Report NPS/CCSOU/NRTR-2002-02 NPS D-113 September 2002 Cooperative Agreement No. 1443 CA-9000-95-0019 Subagreement 1, Modification 3 National Park Service, University of Washington This research was supported by Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, the USGS/ BRD/ FRESC Cascadia Field Station and the NPS Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit. The USGS Cascadia Field Station and the Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit are housed in the University of Washington, College of Forest Resources. iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLES............................................................................................................................ X MAPS ...............................................................................................................................XI PHOTOGRAPHS ......................................................................................................... XII LETTER OF ENDORSEMENT FROM THE HOONAH INDIAN ASSOCIATION ........................................................................................................................................XIII LETTER OF ENDORSEMENT FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF GLACIER BAY NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE ............................................................ XIV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................... XVII I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Background of the Project...................................................................... 1 Project funding............................................................................................................. 7 Project personnel ......................................................................................................... 7 Research Objectives and Questions................................................................................. 8 II. RESEARCH METHODS......................................................................................... 11 Researchers' Interaction with GBNPP Staff and the Hoonah Community................ 12 Selection of Consultants................................................................................................ 14 Semi-structured Interviews............................................................................................ 14 Interviews and Transcriptions ....................................................................................... 15 Two fieldwork periods................................................................................................ 15 Interview transcriptions ............................................................................................. 16 Consultants' review of transcriptions......................................................................... 16 Analysis of the Data ...................................................................................................... 16 Limitations of the Interview Data.................................................................................. 18 III. A SKETCH OF HUNA TLINGIT SETTLEMENT PATTERNS AND SUBSISTANCE PRACTICES PRIOR TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF GLACIER BAY NATIONAL PARK ............................................................................................... 23 Who are the Huna Tlingit? ............................................................................................ 23 A Sketch of Huna Tlingit History ................................................................................. 32 Huna Tlingit Subsistence in Glacier Bay: An Historical Perspective.......................... 35 Huna Tlingit Subsistence Patterns................................................................................. 40 v Seasonal Harvest Patterns.............................................................................................. 45 Bird Egg Harvests and Traditional Land and Resource Rights..................................... 49 “Traditional Egg-Harvesting Practices of the Huna Tlingit” ........................................ 53 IV. SUMMARY OF THE BIOLOGICAL LITERATURE CONCERNING THE POPULATIONS AND DISTRIBUTION OF RELEVANT BIRD SPECIES WITHIN THE HUNA TLINGIT TRADITIONAL TRIBAL TERRITORY ........... 55 CHARADRIIFORMES................................................................................................. 60 LARIDAE: GULLS AND TERNS ............................................................................... 60 Glaucous-winged [Larus glaucescens] and Herring Gull [L. argentatus].............. 60 Mew Gull [Larus canus] ........................................................................................... 66 Black-legged Kittiwake [Rissa tridactyla]............................................................... 66 Arctic [Sterna pardisaea] and Aleutian Tern [S. aleutica]...................................... 67 CHARADRII: “SHOREBIRDS” .................................................................................. 68 HAEMATOPODIDAE.................................................................................................. 68 Black Oystercatcher [Haematopus bachmani] ........................................................ 68 ALCAE; ALCIDAE ...................................................................................................... 69 Tufted Puffin [Fratercula cirrhata] and Horned Puffin [F. corniculata] .............. 69 Marbled Murrelet [Brachyramphus marmoratus] and Kittlitz’s Murrelet [B. brevirostris]................................................................................................................ 70 Pigeon Guillemot [Cepphus columba]...................................................................... 70 Common Murre [Uria aalge]................................................................................... 71 PELICANIFORMES..................................................................................................... 72 PHALACROCORACIDAE: CORMORANTS............................................................. 72 Pelagic Cormorant [Phalacrocorax pelagicus] ....................................................... 72 ANATIFORMES........................................................................................................... 73 ANATIDAE: DUCKS, GEESE, AND SWANS........................................................... 73 Canada Goose [Branta canadensis] ......................................................................... 73 Mallard [Anas platyrhynchos] .................................................................................. 74 Other Duck Species.................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Predation by Gray Catbird on Brown Thrasher Eggs

    Predation by Gray Catbird on Brown Thrasher Eggs

    March 2004 Notes 101 PREDATION BY GRAY CATBIRD ON BROWN THRASHER EGGS JAMES W. RIVERS* AND BRETT K. SANDERCOCK Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506 (JWR) Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506 (BKS) Present address of JWR: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 *Correspondent: [email protected] ABSTRACT The gray catbird (Dumetella carolinensis) has been documented visiting and breaking the eggs of arti®cial nests, but the implications of such observations are unclear because there is little cost in depredating an undefended nest. During the summer of 2001 at Konza Prairie Bio- logical Station, Kansas, we videotaped a gray catbird that broke and consumed at least 1 egg in a brown thrasher (Toxostoma rufum) nest. Our observation was consistent with egg predation because the catbird consumed the contents of the damaged egg after breaking it. The large difference in body mass suggests that a catbird (37 g) destroying eggs in a thrasher (69 g) nest might risk injury if caught in the act of predation and might explain why egg predation by catbirds has been poorly documented. Our observation indicated that the catbird should be considered as an egg predator of natural nests and that single-egg predation of songbird nests should not be attributed to egg removal by female brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) without additional evidence. RESUMEN El paÂjaro gato gris (Dumetella carolinensis) ha sido documentado visitando y rompien- do los huevos de nidos arti®ciales, pero las implicaciones de dichas observaciones no son claras porque hay poco costo por depredar un nido sin defensa.
  • Of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Nunavut, Canada

    Of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Nunavut, Canada

    english cover 11/14/01 1:13 PM Page 1 FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove Principal Researchers: Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove PO Box 1379 Principal Researchers: Iqaluit, Nunavut Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and X0A 0H0 Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike Cover photo: Glenn Williams/Ursus Illustration on cover, inside of cover, title page, dedication page, and used as a report motif: “Arvanniaqtut (Whale Hunters)”, sc 1986, Simeonie Kopapik, Cape Dorset Print Collection. ©Nunavut Wildlife Management Board March, 2000 Table of Contents I LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . .i II DEDICATION . .ii III ABSTRACT . .iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RATIONALE AND BACKGROUND FOR THE STUDY . .1 1.2 TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE . .1 2 METHODOLOGY 3 2.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN . .3 2.2 THE STUDY AREA . .4 2.3 INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES AND THE QUESTIONNAIRE . .4 2.4 METHODS OF DATA ANALYSIS .
  • Abstracts from the 1999 Symposium

    Abstracts from the 1999 Symposium

    UTAH I THE I DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL ARIZONA NEVADA l I i I / + S v'LEI S % A|. w a CALIFORNIA PROCEEDINGS OF 1999 SYMPOSIUM DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1999 SYMPOSIUM A compilation of reports and papers presented at the twenty-fourth annual symposium of the Desert Tortoise Council, March 5-8, 1999 St. George, Utah PUBLICATIONS OF THE DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL, INC. Members Non-members Proceedings of the 1976 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1977 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1978 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1979 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1980 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1981 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1982 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1983 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1984 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1985 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1986 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1987-91 Desert Tortoise Council Symposia $20,00 $20.00 Proceedings of the 1992 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1993 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1994 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1995 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1996 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1997-98 Desert Tortoise Council Symposia $10.00 $15.00 Annotated Bibliog raphy of the Desert Tortoise, Gopherus agassizii $10.00 $15.00 Note: Please add $1.00 per copy to cover postage and handling.
  • Effects of Trail Traffic on Egg-Predation by Mammal Populations in the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve

    Effects of Trail Traffic on Egg-Predation by Mammal Populations in the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve

    Effects of trail traffic on egg-predation by mammal populations in the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve. Karmen Scott Department of Environmental Science, University of Oregon ABSTRACT The effects of human traffic within trails on egg predation and predatory mammal compositions between heavily trafficked trails and secluded trails were studied at the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve. This study was able to find differences in egg-predatory mammal compositions between these two trail types by looking at teeth impressions in eggs made of plasticine. The main predator was found to be Nasura narica (common coati) who was involved in the majority of the egg predation events and the vast majority of the nests preyed upon were on the highly trafficked trail. There were only a few predation events from other mammals such as rodents and Cebus capucinus (white-faced monkey). In this case, the abundance of tourists have altered populations of a mesopredator, Nasua narica by providing a new food source for them (garbage and tourist‟s lunches) and by affecting the rarity of their predators (boas, cats and Tayras) whom steer-clear of human populated areas and therefore steer-clear of N. narica. This dualistic relationship acting on the population of N. narica makes for an increase in the carrying capacity and, hence, further predation. This imbalanced egg- predation by N. narica on tourist trails allocates the disruption of their prey populations. Studies of the impacts of tourism have important conservation implications because tourism can have a tremendous disturbance on structure and community function. RESUMEN Los efectos del tráfico humano en la depredación de huevos en los senderos y en las composiciones de las comunidades de mamíferos depredadores entre los senderos con mucho tránsito y los senderos recluidos fueron estudiados en La Reserva del Bosque Nuboso de Monteverde.
  • Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents to Discover the Past and Imagine the Future

    Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents to Discover the Past and Imagine the Future

    Winter 2014-2015 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xliii, No. 1 Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents To discover the past and imagine the future. Is it Time for a Portolá Trail Designation in San Mateo County? ....................... 3 by Paul O. Reimer, P.E. Our Mission Development of Foster City: A Photo Essay .................................................... 15 To enrich, excite and by T. Jack Foster, Jr. educate through understanding, preserving The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors and interpreting the history Paul Barulich, Chairman; Barbara Pierce, Vice Chairwoman; Shawn DeLuna, Secretary; of San Mateo County. Dee Tolles, Treasurer; Thomas Ames; Alpio Barbara; Keith Bautista; Sandra McLellan Behling; John Blake; Elaine Breeze; David Canepa; Tracy De Leuw; Dee Eva; Ted Everett; Accredited Pat Hawkins; Mark Jamison; Peggy Bort Jones; Doug Keyston; John LaTorra; Joan by the American Alliance Levy; Emmet W. MacCorkle; Karen S. McCown; Nick Marikian; Olivia Garcia Martinez; Gene Mullin; Bob Oyster; Patrick Ryan; Paul Shepherd; John Shroyer; Bill Stronck; of Museums. Joseph Welch III; Shawn White and Mitchell P. Postel, President. President’s Advisory Board Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; John Clinton; Robert M. Desky; T. Jack Foster, The San Mateo County Jr.; Umang Gupta; Greg Munks; Phill Raiser; Cynthia L. Schreurs and John Schrup. Historical Association Leadership Council operates the San Mateo John C. Adams, Wells Fargo; Jenny Johnson, Franklin Templeton Investments; Barry County History Museum Jolette, San Mateo Credit Union and Paul Shepherd, Cargill. and Archives at the old San Mateo County Courthouse La Peninsula located in Redwood City, Carmen J.
  • THE ONTARIO CURRICULUM, GRADES 9 to 12 | First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Studies

    THE ONTARIO CURRICULUM, GRADES 9 to 12 | First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Studies

    2019 REVISED The Ontario Curriculum Grades 9 to 12 First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Studies The Ontario Public Service endeavours to demonstrate leadership with respect to accessibility in Ontario. Our goal is to ensure that Ontario government services, products, and facilities are accessible to all our employees and to all members of the public we serve. This document, or the information that it contains, is available, on request, in alternative formats. Please forward all requests for alternative formats to ServiceOntario at 1-800-668-9938 (TTY: 1-800-268-7095). CONTENTS PREFACE 3 Secondary Schools for the Twenty-first Century � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Supporting Students’ Well-being and Ability to Learn � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 INTRODUCTION 6 Vision and Goals of the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Studies Curriculum � � � � � � � � � � � � � �6 The Importance of the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Studies Curriculum � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �7 Citizenship Education in the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Studies Curriculum � � � � � � � �10 Roles and Responsibilities in the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Studies Program � � � � � � �12 THE PROGRAM IN FIRST NATIONS, MÉTIS, AND INUIT STUDIES 16 Overview of the Program � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �16 Curriculum Expectations � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
  • Golden Circle Scenic 7 Days from Whitehorse

    Golden Circle Scenic 7 Days from Whitehorse

    Golden Circle Scenic 7 days from Whitehorse Itinerary at a glance: Day 0: Arrival in Whitehorse Day 1: The Yukon - Miles Canyon, Emerald Lake, World's Smallest Desert, Carcross, Bennett Lake, Yukon Suspension Bridge, and International Falls Day 2: Skagway - White Pass Railroad and Taiya River Scenic float Day 3: Juneau - Whale Watching, Mendenhall Glacier, and Salmon Hatchery Day 4: Haines - Kroeschel Wildlife Refuge, Klukwan Native Village, and Float through Bald Eagle Preserve Day 5: Haines - Canoe on Chilkoot Lake, Raptor Center, and Distillery Tasting Day 6: The Yukon - Chilkat Mountains, Kathleen Lake, Million Dollar Falls, Tatshenshini River, Kluane National Park Visitor Center, Yukon River, and Whitehorse Day 7: Departure from Whitehorse Day 0: Arrival Day Upon your arrival into Whitehorse, your guide will be waiting to transfer you to your hotel. After you are settled, you will meet with your guide and travelling companions to discuss the itinerary. Time will be confirmed. On this arrival day, you will have free time to enjoy the Capitol of the Yukon. Your guide will let you know at what time to meet the next day to start your adventure through Alaska and the Yukon. Meals on your own. Day 1: The Yukon - Exploring Yukon, British Columbia, and Alaska en route to Skagway After breakfast, we will stroll along the Yukon River Boardwalk and through downtown Whitehorse. Along the way, we will learn about the Athabaskan culture and this supply post's important role during the Gold Rush. Grab a latte or a smoothie and watch the might waters of the Yukon River rush past.
  • Egg Predation in Reedbed Nesting Greylag Geese Anser Anser in Vejlerne, Denmark

    Egg Predation in Reedbed Nesting Greylag Geese Anser Anser in Vejlerne, Denmark

    137 EGG PREDATION IN REEDBED NESTING GREYLAG GEESE ANSER ANSER IN VEJLERNE, DENMARK JENS NYELAND KRISTIANSENl,2 Kristiansen J.N. 1998. Egg predation in reedbed nesting Greylag Geese An­ ser anser in Vejlerne, Denmark. Ardea 86: 137-145. Egg predation in Greylag Geese Anser anser nesting in reedbeds was stud­ ied at three sites in Vejlerne (NW Denmark). Overall, 34% of all clutches hatched successfully (range 26-53%), while at least 34% of all nests were abandoned. Avian predation of clutches was particularly high on one site (20%) compared to other sites (0-2%), probably as a result of better breed­ ing opportunities for crows in that area. Mammalian egg predation was low in the two sites with natural barriers in the form of water channels or with higher vegetation densities. Nests neighbouring depredated nests were more likely to be depredated. An important factor affecting egg predation by mammals was the distance of the nest to reed cutting tracks. Second, there was a tendency for successful nests to occur in areas with higher veg­ etation densities. Mammalian predators were Red Fox Vulpes vulpes and American Mink Mustela vison and/or Western Polecat M. putorius. Key words: Anser anser - egg predation - reedbed - mammalian predators lThe National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Coastal Zone Ecology, Kal¢, Grenavej 12, DK-8410 R¢nde, Denmark; 2University of Copenhagen, Zoological Institute, Department of Population Biology, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark, e-mail: JNKris­ [email protected] INTRODUCTION mammalian predators, or hide their nests in dense vegetation to avoid detection by avian predators. The reproductive output of geese varies greatly This study examined the importance of factors af­ within and between species (Johnson et al.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 45/Thursday, March 7, 2019/Rules and Regulations

    Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 45/Thursday, March 7, 2019/Rules and Regulations

    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 8263 III. Statutory and Executive Orders state submission in response to a ACTION: Final rule; issuance of Letters of Federal standard. Authorization (LOA). Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR This action does not impose an 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is information collection burden under the SUMMARY: NMFS, upon request from the not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and provisions of the Paperwork Reduction National Park Service (NPS), hereby therefore is not subject to review under Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). issues regulations to govern the Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). unintentional taking of marine FR 3821, January 21, 2011). This action mammals incidental to research and is also not subject to Executive Order List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 monitoring activities in southern Alaska 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations Environmental protection, Air over the course of five years (2019– That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, pollution control, Administrative 2024). These regulations, which allow Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May practice and procedure, sewage sludge for the issuance of Letters of 22, 2001). This action approves the incineration units. Authorization (LOA) for the incidental state’s negative declaration as meeting Dated: March 1, 2019. take of marine mammals during the described activities and specified Federal requirements and imposes no James Gulliford,
  • Native American Art Los Angeles I December 11, 2018

    Native American Art Los Angeles I December 11, 2018

    Native American Art Los Angeles I December 11, 2018 Native American Art Los Angeles | Tuesday December 11, 2018 at 11am BONHAMS BIDS INQUIRIES REGISTRATION 7601 W. Sunset Boulevard +1 323 850 7500 Ingmars Lindbergs, Director IMPORTANT NOTICE Los Angeles, CA 90046 +1 323 850 6090 (fax) [email protected] Please note that all customers, bonhams.com [email protected] +1 (415) 503 3393 irrespective of any previous activity with Bonhams, are required to PREVIEW To bid via the internet please visit Kim Jarand, Specialist complete the Bidder Registration Friday December 7, www.bonhams.com/24850 [email protected] Form in advance of the sale. The 12pm to 5pm +1 (323) 436 5430 form can be found at the back Saturday December 8, Please note that telephone bids of every catalogue and on our 12pm to 5pm must be submitted no later than ILLUSTRATIONS website at www.bonhams.com Sunday December 9, 4pm on the day prior to the Front cover: Lot 394 and should be returned by email or 12pm to 5pm auction. New bidders must also Session page: Lot 362 post to the specialist department Monday December 10, provide proof of identity and or to the bids department at 9am to 11am address when submitting bids. [email protected] Tuesday December 11, Please contact client services 9am to 11am with any bidding inquiries. To bid live online and / or leave internet bids please go to www.bonhams.com/auctions/24850 SALE NUMBER: 24850 LIVE ONLINE BIDDING IS AVAILABLE FOR THIS SALE and click on the Register to bid link Lots 300 - 606 Please email: at the top left of the page.
  • Breve Introducción a La Presencia Española En El

    Breve Introducción a La Presencia Española En El

    Introducción a la presencia española en el Noroeste BREVE INTRODUCCIÓN A LA PRESENCIA 1 ESPAÑOLA EN EL NOROESTE DE AMÉRICA Alicia Herreros Cepeda Universidad Rey Juan Carlos La historia de las exploraciones del Noroeste tienen su origen en la búsqueda del legendario Paso del Noroeste -también denominado en ocasiones Estrecho de Anián-, que, según creían los marineros de la Edad Moderna, había de comunicar por el Norte los océanos Atlántico y Pacífico, igual que lo hacía en el Sur el estrecho de Magallanes, doblando el cabo de Hornos. Varios eran los relatos que hablaban de marineros españoles que habían logrado localizar y navegar el Pasaje. Uno de los casos más conocidos es del de Lorenzo Ferrer Maldonado, quien, supustamente, podría haber recorrido el Paso del Noroeste en 1588. Otro sería el de Juan de Fuca, un marinero de origen cretense al servicio de España que, en 1592, habría zarpado de Acapulco y habría localizado el Estrecho de Anián, recorriéndolo en sentido Oeste-Este hasta llegar a las aguas del océano Atlántico. Un tercer caso es el de Bartolomé de Fonte, que, según un libro inglés del siglo XVIII, habría recorrido el Pasaje a mediados del siglo XVII. La veracidad de todos estos recorridos por el Paso del Noroeste nunca ha podido ser establecida 2. La búsqueda del Paso del Noroeste, es una de las más fascinantes de toda la historia de las exploraciones navales. Desde el siglo XVI, marinos ingleses -fundamentalmente, pero no únicamente-, trataron de encontrar este paso legendario, ya que las rutas tradicionales hacia Asia desde Europa estaban controladas por España y Portugal.
  • The Pacific Historian, Volume 30, Number 1 (1986)

    The Pacific Historian, Volume 30, Number 1 (1986)

    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons The aP cific iH storian Western Americana 1986 The aP cific iH storian, Volume 30, Number 1 (1986) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/pac-historian Recommended Citation "The aP cific iH storian, Volume 30, Number 1 (1986)" (1986). The Pacific isH torian. 116. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/pac-historian/116 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Western Americana at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The aP cific Historian by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Native Missionaries of the North Pacific Coast Philip McKay and Others E. Palmer Patterson Indian: A History Since 1500 (1972) and Mis­ sion on the Nass: The Evangelization of the Nishga (1860-1890) (1982). His current re­ E. Palmer Patterson is Associate Professor search is on the history of the Nishga Indi­ of History at the University of Waterloo, ans of British Columbia in contact with Ontario, Canada. Among his works on Europeans during the second half of the Canadian native peoples are The Canadian nineteenth century. White missionaries and their native converts. N WRITING THE HISTORY of nineteenth sion is seen as an example of European or Euro­ century Christian missions the tendency has American/Euro-Canadian cultural expansion and Ibeen to deal primarily with the European and its techniques of dissemination. However, native Euro-American or Euro-Canadian missionarie·s cultures have not always been destroyed, though and their exploits- as adventure, devotion , sac­ they have often been drastically altered .