DOCSLIB.ORG

Agrimin Mackay Project Level 1 Fauna and Single Phase Level 2 Flora Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agrimin Mackay Project Level 1 Fauna and Single Phase Level 2 Flora Assessment JANUARY 2017 AGRIMIN MACKAY PROJECT LEVEL 1 FAUNA AND SINGLE PHASE LEVEL 2 FLORA ASSESSMENT This page has been left blank intentionally. Mackay Project Level 1 Fauna and Single-phase Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment Document Status Approved for Issue Rev. Author(s) Reviewer Date Name Distributed To Date 0 A. Craigie, T. Moyle S. Grein 23/12/2016 S. Grein M. Savich 23/12/2016 1 A. Craigie, S.Grein S. Grein 23/01/2017 S. Grein M. Savich 23/01/2017 ecologia Environment (2017). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of Agrimin ecologia Environment 45 Gladstone Street East Perth WA 6004 Phone: 08 6168 7200 Email: [email protected] January 2017 i Mackay Project Level 1 Fauna and Single-phase Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment This page has been left blank intentionally. January 2017 ii Mackay Project Level 1 Fauna and Single-phase Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................... 1 1.3 SURVEY OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 6 2 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................. 8 2.1 CLIMATE .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 BIOGEOGRAPHIC REGION ......................................................................................................... 9 2.3 GEOLOGY AND LANDFORMS...................................................................................................11 2.4 SOILS .......................................................................................................................................13 2.5 REGIONAL VEGETATION ..........................................................................................................15 2.6 PREVIOUS SURVEYS AT THE STUDY AREA ...............................................................................15 3 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................. 20 3.1 DATABASE SEARCHES ..............................................................................................................20 3.2 POTENTIAL CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANT VERTEBRATE FAUNA ............................................25 3.3 FLORA AND VEGETATION ........................................................................................................27 3.4 FIELD ASSESSMENT – LEVEL 1 FAUNA SURVEYS .....................................................................33 3.5 FAUNA HABITAT MAPPING .....................................................................................................34 3.6 STUDY TEAM AND LICENCES ...................................................................................................35 3.7 ANIMAL ETHICS .......................................................................................................................35 4 DATABASE RESULTS ........................................................................................................ 37 4.1 SIGNIFICANT FLORA RECORDS FROM DATABASE SEARCHES .................................................37 4.2 INTRODUCED FLORA RECORDS FROM DATABASE SEARCHES ................................................37 4.3 SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION COMMUNITY RECORDS FROM DATABASE SEARCHES ................37 4.4 INTRODUCED FLORA RECORDS FROM DATABASE SEARCHES ................................................37 4.5 SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION COMMUNITY RECORDS FROM DATABASE SEARCHES ................37 4.6 FAUNA RECORDS FROM PREVIOUS SURVEYS AND DATABASE SEARCHES .............................40 5 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................... 41 5.1 FLORA ......................................................................................................................................41 5.2 CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT - FLORA ...........................................................53 5.3 VEGETATION ...........................................................................................................................54 5.4 CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT - VEGETATION ................................................59 5.5 FAUNA .................................................................................................................................. 105 5.6 FAUNA HABITATS ................................................................................................................. 105 January 2017 iii Mackay Project Level 1 Fauna and Single-phase Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment 5.7 FAUNA ASSEMBLAGES ......................................................................................................... 108 5.8 FLORA SURVEY LIMITATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS ............................................................... 112 5.9 FAUNA SURVEY LIMITATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS .............................................................. 113 6 DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................. 115 6.1 FLORA ................................................................................................................................... 115 6.3 FAUNA .................................................................................................................................. 118 7 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................. 125 7.1 FLORA AND VEGETATION ..................................................................................................... 125 7.2 FAUNA .................................................................................................................................. 125 9 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 127 January 2017 iv Mackay Project Level 1 Fauna and Single-phase Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment TABLES Table 2-1 – Geology at the study area ...................................................................................................11 Table 2-2 – Soils at the study area .........................................................................................................13 Table 2-3 – Shepherd and Beard vegetation at the study area .............................................................15 Table 2-4 – Flora, vegetation and fauna surveys conducted in the vicinity of the study area ..............17 Table 2-5 – Lake Mackay (Theseus Project) vegetation communities (Outback Ecology 2012a) ..........18 Table 2-6 – Lake Mackay (Theseus Project) fauna habitat (Outback Ecology 2012b) ...........................18 Table 3-1 – Criteria used to assess likelihood of occurrence of significant flora ...................................22 Table 3-2 – Control categories for Declared Pests .................................................................................24 Table 3-3 – Fauna likelihood of occurrence categories ..........................................................................26 Table 3-4 – Vegetation condition scale (Trudgen 1991) ........................................................................31 Table 3-5 – Habitat condition assessment .............................................................................................35 Table 3-6 – Study team and licences ......................................................................................................35 Table 4-1 – Significant flora records from database and desktop searches and likelihood of occurrence .........................................................................................................................38 Table 4-2 – Previous fauna records ........................................................................................................40 Table 4-3 – Significant species recorded from the database searches ..................................................40 Table 5-1 –Floristic summary for the study area ...................................................................................41 Table 5-2 – Most diverse families and genera at the study area ...........................................................41 Table 5-3 – Priority Flora recorded during the survey ...........................................................................44 Table 5-4 – Records representing bioregional range extensions ...........................................................48 Table 5-5 – Records representing significant range extensions (> approx. 100 km) .............................49 Table 5-6 – Locations of Introduced Flora (WGS84 UTM Zone 52) ........................................................51 Table 5-7 – DPaW environmental risk assessment status .....................................................................51
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Australia: State of the Environment 1996: Chapter 4
    Chapter 4 . Biodiversity ‘Still Flying’ from the painting of a Wandering Albatross by Richard Prepared by Weatherly. Denis Saunders (Chair), CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology Andrew Beattie, Centre for Biodiversity and Bioresources, School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University Susannah Eliott (Research Assistant/Science Writer), Centre for Science Communication, University of Technology, Sydney Marilyn Fox, School of Geography, University of New South Wales Burke Hill, CSIRO Division of Fisheries Bob Pressey, New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service Duncan Veal, Centre for Biodiversity and Bioresources, School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University Jackie Venning, State of Environment Reporting, South Australian Department of Environment and Natural Resources Mathew Maliel (State of the Environment Reporting Unit member), Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories (Facilitator) Charlie Zammit (former State of the Environment Reporting Unit member), Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories (former Facilitator) 4-1 . Australia: State of the Environment 1996 . Contents Introduction. 4-4 Pressure . 4-7 Human populations . 4-9 Urban development . 4-9 Tourism and recreation . 4-9 Harvesting resources and land use. 4-10 Fisheries . 4-10 Forestry . 4-11 Pastoralism. 4-12 Agriculture . 4-12 Introduced species . 4-16 Vertebrates . 4-16 Invertebrates. 4-17 Plants. 4-18 Micro-organisms. 4-20 Native species out of place . 4-20 Pollution . 4-21 Mining . 4-22 Climate change . 4-22 State . 4-23 The state of ecosystem diversity . 4-23 Biogeographic regionalisations for Australia . 4-23 Ecosystem diversity. 4-26 The state of species diversity. 4-30 Number and distribution of species . 4-31 Status of species .
    [Show full text]
  • Broken Hill Complex
    Broken Hill Complex Bioregion resources Photo Mulyangarie, DEH Broken Hill Complex The Broken Hill Complex bioregion is located in western New South Wales and eastern South Australia, spanning the NSW-SA border. It includes all of the Barrier Ranges and covers a huge area of nearly 5.7 million hectares with approximately 33% falling in South Australia! It has an arid climate with dry hot summers and mild winters. The average rainfall is 222mm per year, with slightly more rainfall occurring in summer. The bioregion is rich with Aboriginal cultural history, with numerous archaeological sites of significance. Biodiversity and habitat The bioregion consists of low ranges, and gently rounded hills and depressions. The main vegetation types are chenopod and samphire shrublands; casuarina forests and woodlands and acacia shrublands. Threatened animal species include the Yellow-footed Rock- wallaby and Australian Bustard. Grazing, mining and wood collection for over 100 years has led to a decline in understory plant species and cover, affecting ground nesting birds and ground feeding insectivores. 2 | Broken Hill Complex Photo by Francisco Facelli Broken Hill Complex Threats Threats to the Broken Hill Complex bioregion and its dependent species include: For Further information • erosion and degradation caused by overgrazing by sheep, To get involved or for more information please cattle, goats, rabbits and macropods phone your nearest Natural Resources Centre or • competition and predation by feral animals such as rabbits, visit www.naturalresources.sa.gov.au
    [Show full text]
  • Little Sandy Desert 1 (LSD1 – Rudall Subregion)
    Little Sand Desert 1 Little Sandy Desert 1 (LSD1 – Rudall subregion) PETER KENDRICK NOVEMBER 2001 Subregional description and biodiversity across the desert and into a major salt lake within the Little Sandy Desert (the other is Savory Creek). values Only the upper half of the course of the Rudall River is within LSD1. • Description and area Small permanent rockhole wetlands associated with ranges and uplands. Locally significant water Sparse shrub-steppe over Triodia basedowii on stony hills, sources, with high biological and cultural with River Gum communities and bunch grasslands on significance. • alluvial deposits in and associated with ranges. The Small artificial surface water sources constructed climate is Arid with summer rainfall. The Rudall along the Canning Stock Route (far eastern part of Complex, Throssell Group and Lamil Group of the LSD1). Many in disrepair, but there is an active Patterson Orogen. Proterozoic hill country of Throssell, program of refurbishment underway, and many are Mount Sears, Broadhurst and Harbutt Ranges. Includes open again. Sometimes a locally significant source of headwaters and course of Rudall River. Extensive areas of water. tussock grass are associated with footslopes. River Gum communities along drainage. Extensive Triodia Refugia: • hummock grasslands on hills and surrounding plains. The The only refuge listed by Morton et al. (1995) area of the subregion is 1, 078, 070 ha. within LSD1 is the Rudall River. They note that it may provide a seasonal refuge to wildlife. Dominant land use • The hills of the McKay, Harbutt, Fingoon and Broadhurst Ranges present some areas that are protected from fire. Dominant land uses in the subregion are Conservation (xiii), Unallocated Crown land (xi), (x), Mining leases High Species and Ecosystem Diversity: (vii), and Urban (i) (Parnngurr Aboriginal Community There is a high number of arid zone reptiles, particularly near Cotton Creek in Rudall River National Park) (see skink lizards (genera Ctenotus and Lerista).
    [Show full text]
  • Energy from the Desert
    SUMMARY Energy from the Desert Feasibility of Very Large Scale Photovoltaic Power Generation (VLS-PV) Systems EDITOR Kosuke Kurokawa Energy from the Desert SUMMARY Energy from the Desert Feasibility of Very Large Scale Photovoltaic Power Generation (VLS-PV) Systems EDITOR Kosuke Kurokawa PART THREE: SCENARIO STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS Published by James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd 8–12 Camden High Street, London, NW1 0JH, UK © Photovoltaic Power Systems Executive Committee of the International Energy Agency The moral right of the author has been asserted. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the copyright holder and the publisher. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Printed in Hong Kong by H&Y Printing Ltd Cover image: Horizon Stock Images / Michael Simmons Neither the authors nor the publisher make any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the information contained in this publication, or assume any liability with respect to the use of, or damages resulting from, this information. Please note: in this publication a comma has been used as a decimal point, according to the ISO standard adopted by the International Energy Agency. CHAPTER ELEVEN: CONCLUSIONS OF PART 1 AND PART 2 Contents Foreword vi Preface vii Task VIII Participants viii COMPREHENSIVE SUMMARY Objective 1 Background and concept of VLS-PV 1 VLS-PV case studies 1 Scenario studies 2 Understandings 2 R ecommendations 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT 25/10/90; Plant List Updated Oct. 1992; Notes Added June 2021
    DRAFT 25/10/90; plant list updated Oct. 1992; notes added June 2021. PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE CONSERVATION VALUES OF OPEN COUNTRY PADDOCK, BOOLARDY STATION Allan H. Burbidge and J.K. Rolfe INTRODUCTION Boolardy Station is situated about 150 km north of Yalgoo and 140 km west-north-west of Cue, in the Shire of Murchison, Western Australia. Open Country Paddock (about 16 000 ha) is in the south-east corner of the station, at 27o05'S, 116o50'E. The most prominent named feature is Coolamooka Hill, near the eastern boundary of the paddock. There are no conservation reserves in this region, although there are some small reserves set aside for various other purposes. Previous biological data for the station consist of broad scale vegetation mapping and land system mapping. Beard (1976) mapped the entire Murchison region at 1: 1 000 000. The Open Country Paddock area was mapped as supporting mulga woodlands and shrublands. More detailed mapping of land system units for rangeland assessment purposes has been carried out more recently at a scale of 1: 40 000 (Payne and Curry in prep.). Seven land systems were identified in open Country Paddock (Fig. 1). Apart from these studies, no detailed biological survey work appears to have been done in the area. Open Country Paddock has been only lightly grazed by domestic stock because of the presence of Kite-leaf Poison (Gastrolobium laytonii) and a lack of fresh water. Because of this and the generally good condition of the paddock and presence of a wide range of plant species, P.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Structure of Vertebrate Communities Across the Australian
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2013) 40, 1059–1070 ORIGINAL Phylogenetic structure of vertebrate ARTICLE communities across the Australian arid zone Hayley C. Lanier*, Danielle L. Edwards and L. Lacey Knowles Department of Ecology and Evolutionary ABSTRACT Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Aim To understand the relative importance of ecological and historical factors Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA in structuring terrestrial vertebrate assemblages across the Australian arid zone, and to contrast patterns of community phylogenetic structure at a continental scale. Location Australia. Methods We present evidence from six lineages of terrestrial vertebrates (five lizard clades and one clade of marsupial mice) that have diversified in arid and semi-arid Australia across 37 biogeographical regions. Measures of within-line- age community phylogenetic structure and species turnover were computed to examine how patterns differ across the continent and between taxonomic groups. These results were examined in relation to climatic and historical fac- tors, which are thought to play a role in community phylogenetic structure. Analyses using a novel sliding-window approach confirm the generality of pro- cesses structuring the assemblages of the Australian arid zone at different spa- tial scales. Results Phylogenetic structure differed greatly across taxonomic groups. Although these lineages have radiated within the same biome – the Australian arid zone – they exhibit markedly different community structure at the regio- nal and local levels. Neither current climatic factors nor historical habitat sta- bility resulted in a uniform response across communities. Rather, historical and biogeographical aspects of community composition (i.e. local lineage per- sistence and diversification histories) appeared to be more important in explaining the variation in phylogenetic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling the Market: Incentives for Biodiversity in the Rangelands
    Enabling the Market: Incentives for Biodiversity in the Rangelands: Report to the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources by the Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre Anita Smyth Anthea Coggan Famiza Yunus Russell Gorddard Stuart Whitten Jocelyn Davies Nic Gambold Jo Maloney Rodney Edwards Rob Brandle Mike Fleming John Read June 2007 Copyright and Disclaimers © Commonwealth of Australia 2007 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Contributing author information Anita Smyth: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Anthea Coggan: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Famiza Yunus: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Russell Gorddard: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Stuart Whitten: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Jocelyn Davies: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Nic Gambold: Central Land Council Jo Maloney Rodney Edwards: Ngaanyatjarra Council Rob Brandle: South Austalia Department for Environment and Heritage Mike Fleming: South Australia Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation John Read: BHP Billiton Desert Knowledge CRC Report Number 18 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source.
    [Show full text]
  • By H.D.V. PRENDERGAST a Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University. January 1
    STRUCTURAL, BIOCHEMICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL RELATIONSHIPS IN AUSTRALIAN c4 GRASSES (POACEAE) • by H.D.V. PRENDERGAST A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University. January 1987. Canberra, Australia. i STATEMENT This thesis describes my own work which included collaboration with Dr N .. E. Stone (Taxonomy Unit, R .. S .. B.S .. ), whose expertise in enzyme assays enabled me to obtain comparative information on enzyme activities reported in Chapters 3, 5 and 7; and with Mr M.. Lazarides (Australian National Herbarium, c .. s .. r .. R .. O .. ), whose as yet unpublished taxonomic views on Eragrostis form the basis of some of the discussion in Chapter 3. ii This thesis describes the results of research work carried out in the Taxonomy Unit, Research School of Biological Sciences, The Australian National University during the tenure of an A.N.U. Postgraduate Scholarship. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My time in the Taxonomy Unit has been a happy one: I could not have asked for better supervision for my project or for a more congenial atmosphere in which to work. To Dr. Paul Hattersley, for his help, advice, encouragement and friendship, I owe a lot more than can be said in just a few words: but, Paul, thanks very much! To Mr. Les Watson I owe as much for his own support and guidance, and for many discussions on things often psittacaceous as well as graminaceous! Dr. Nancy Stone was a kind teacher in many days of enzyme assays and Chris Frylink a great help and friend both in and out of the lab •• Further thanks go to Mike Lazarides (Australian National Herbarium, c.s.I.R.O.) for identifying many grass specimens and for unpublished data on infrageneric groups in Eragrostis; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Nature's Safety Net 2008
    Building Nature’s Safety Net 2008 Progress on the Directions for the National Reserve System Paul Sattler and Martin Taylor Telstra is a proud partner of the WWF Building Nature's Map sources and caveats Safety Net initiative. The Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia © WWF-Australia. All rights protected (IBRA) version 6.1 (2004) and the CAPAD (2006) were ISBN: 1 921031 271 developed through cooperative efforts of the Australian Authors: Paul Sattler and Martin Taylor Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage WWF-Australia and the Arts and State/Territory land management agencies. Head Office Custodianship rests with these agencies. GPO Box 528 Maps are copyright © the Australian Government Department Sydney NSW 2001 of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts 2008 or © Tel: +612 9281 5515 Fax: +612 9281 1060 WWF-Australia as indicated. www.wwf.org.au About the Authors First published March 2008 by WWF-Australia. Any reproduction in full or part of this publication must Paul Sattler OAM mention the title and credit the above mentioned publisher Paul has a lifetime experience working professionally in as the copyright owner. The report is may also be nature conservation. In the early 1990’s, whilst with the downloaded as a pdf file from the WWF-Australia website. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Paul was the principal This report should be cited as: architect in doubling Queensland’s National Park estate. This included the implementation of representative park networks Sattler, P.S. and Taylor, M.F.J. 2008. Building Nature’s for bioregions across the State. Paul initiated and guided the Safety Net 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of the Underground Signs of Marsupial Moles in the WA Great Victoria Desert
    Survey of the underground signs of marsupial moles in the WA Great Victoria Desert Report to Tropicana Joint Venture and the Department of Natural Resources, Environment and the Arts, Northern Territory Government Joe Benshemesh Martin Schulz September 2008 Marsupial moles in the WA Great Victoria Desert Benshemesh & Schulz 2008 Contents Summary.......................................................................................................................3 Introduction..................................................................................................................5 Methods........................................................................................................................7 Methods........................................................................................................................8 Sites.........................................................................................................................8 Trenches.................................................................................................................9 Moleholes ..............................................................................................................9 Additional data ....................................................................................................9 Results..........................................................................................................................12 Characteristics attributes of backfilled tunnels in WA GVD.............................12
    [Show full text]
  • A New Genus of Scolopendrid Centipede (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha: Scolopendrini) from the Central Australian Deserts
    Zootaxa 3321: 22–36 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new genus of scolopendrid centipede (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha: Scolopendrini) from the central Australian deserts JULIANNE WALDOCK1 & GREGORY D. EDGECOMBE2 1Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool, WA 6986, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 2The Natural History Museum, Department of Palaeontology, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The first new species of Scolopendridae discovered in Australia since L.E. Koch’s comprehensive revision in the 1980s is named as a new monotypic genus of the Tribe Scolopendrini, Kanparka leki n. gen. n. sp. Its distribution includes the Gibson and Little Sandy Deserts in Western Australia and the western part of the Tanami Desert in the Northern Territory. The new genus is especially distinguished from other scolopendrines by the spinulation of its robust ultimate legs, partic- ular the presence of spines on the femur and tibia in addition to the predominantly irregularly scattered spines on the prefe- mur. Cladistic analysis based on morphological characters resolves Kanparka in a clade with Scolopendra, Arthrorhabdus, Akymnopellis and Hemiscolopendra, within which Scolopendra is non-monophyletic. Key words: Centipedes, Scolopendridae, Western Australia, Northern Territory, taxonomy, phylogeny Introduction The scolopendrid centipedes of Australia were revised in a series of studies by L.E. Koch that drew upon Austra- lian museum collections amassed during survey programs in the 1960s through early 1980s, as well as historical material.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Victoria Desert Dependent Species By: Species Dependent Its and Bioregion Desert Great Victoria the You Conserve Help Can Park
    Great Victoria Desert Bioregion resources Photo G.Richardson The Great Victoria Desert bioregion is located in the western half of South Australia and stretches into Western Australia. The desert, after which the bioregion is named, is the largest in Australia. It has an arid climate with warm to extremely hot summers and mild to warm winters. The bioregion receives about 100mm to 250mm of rain per year but, like much of the arid zone, it varies significantly from year to year. Water is a particularly precious resource and only the hardiest of plants and animals can survive in these harsh conditions. In the 1950’s and 60’s, nuclear weapon trials were conducted in the bioregion and several areas were, and remain, contaminated. Biodiversity and habitat The bioregion has dunes and swales with playa lakes, lunettes and rocky areas. There are many types of vegetation including chenopod and samphire shrublands, acacia shrublands and open woodlands, eucalypt open woodlands, casuarina and mallee shrublands and woodlands. Rare or threatened animals include the Malleefowl, Sandhill Dunnart and the Southern Marsupial Mole. 2 | Great Victoria Desert Threats Threats to the Great Victoria Desert bioregion and its dependent For further information species include: Public enquiries • clearance and fragmentation of vegetation by developments such as mining and exploration For more local information on any of the species in this resource please contact your nearest Natural Resource Centre office on: • Overgrazing by feral animals, especially camels and rabbits, and damage to waterholes by camels. Eastwood: (08) 8273 9100 Gawler: (08) 8523 7700 Lobethal: (08) 8389 5900 The Great Victoria Desert bioregion Willunga: (08) 8550 3400 supports most of the known Education enquiries population of Sandhill Dunnarts.
    [Show full text]