DOCSLIB.ORG

Corruption in Higher Education

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Corruption in Higher Education Policies and Actions of Accreditation and Quality Assurance Bodies to Counter Corruption in Higher Education Project Report | February 2019 Irene Glendinning | Stella-Maris Orim | Andrew King Coventry University, UK Policies and Actions of Accreditation and Quality Assurance Bodies to Counter Corruption in Higher Education Project Report | February 2019 Irene Glendinning | Stella-Maris Orim | Andrew King Coventry University, UK Contents list 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 7 3. Results .................................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Results Overview ............................................................................................................................................................8 3.2 Analysis of on-line questionnaire responses ................................................................................................................8 3.2.1 Survey participants ...............................................................................................................................................8 3.2.2 Responses about corruption in the regulation of higher education ................................................................11 3.2.3 Corruption in the Teaching Role in Higher Education ......................................................................................13 3.2.4 Corruption in Admissions and Recruitment ......................................................................................................16 3.2.5 Corruption in Student Assessment ....................................................................................................................18 3.2.6 Corruption in Credentials and Qualifications....................................................................................................21 3.2.7 Corruption in Research and Publication ...........................................................................................................23 3.2.8 General feedback from participants ..................................................................................................................25 3.3 Analysis of Interview data ...........................................................................................................................................28 3.3.1 Views on responses to corruption in the regulation of Higher Education ......................................................29 3.3.2 Views on actions against corruption in the governance of higher education institutions .............................31 3.3.3 Different perceptions on acceptability of corruption within higher education ..............................................31 3.3.4 Views on actions against corruption in teaching roles in higher education ...................................................32 3.3.5 Views on actions against corruption in HE admissions and recruitment .......................................................32 3.3.6 Views on actions against corruption in HE assessment ...................................................................................33 3.3.7 Views on actions against corruption in credentials and qualifications ..........................................................34 3.3.8 Views on actions against corruption in research and publication ..................................................................34 3.3.9 Networking and communication to help address corruption in higher education ........................................37 4. Discussion .............................................................................................................................................38 5. Recommendations .................................................................................................................................41 6. Conclusions ..........................................................................................................................................42 References ...............................................................................................................................................43 Appendices ...............................................................................................................................................52 Appendix 1: List of Acronyms .....................................................................................................................53 Appendix 2: List of participants in interviews and informal discussions .........................................................54 Appendix 3: Survey questions ....................................................................................................................55 Appendix 4: Additional feedback from respondents to the questionnaire ......................................................61 Appendix 5 ...............................................................................................................................................64 Literature review ......................................................................................................................................64 A5.1 Key literature sources ................................................................................................................................................64 A5.2 Literature on different types of corruption...............................................................................................................65 A5.2.1 Regulation of higher education systems .........................................................................................................65 A5.2.2 The teaching role of higher education .............................................................................................................67 A5.2.3 Student admission and recruitment ...............................................................................................................69 A5.2.4 Student assessment .........................................................................................................................................71 A5.2.5 Credentials and qualifications .........................................................................................................................73 A5.2.6 Research and publication ................................................................................................................................75 A5.3 Summary of literature review ...................................................................................................................................78 List of Figures and Tables Figure Title Page 1 What is the main purpose of your organization? ....................................................................................... 9 2 Levels of operation of AQABs ...................................................................................................................... 9 3 Area of operation of AQABs.........................................................................................................................10 4 How interested is your organisation in these categories? .......................................................................11 5 Corruption in the regulation of higher education ....................................................................................11 6 Possible responses to corruption in regulation of HE ..............................................................................12 7 How often are actions of this type observed by your organization? ......................................................13 8 Corruption in higher education teaching ..................................................................................................14 9 Possible responses to corruption in HE teaching .....................................................................................14 10 How often are actions of this type observed by your organisation? ......................................................15 11 Corruption in admissions and recruitment ..............................................................................................16 12 Possible responses to corruption in admissions and recruitment ..........................................................17 13 How often are actions of this type observed by your organization? ......................................................17 14 Corruption in assessment ..........................................................................................................................18 15 Possible responses to corruption in assessment .....................................................................................19 16 How often are actions of this type observed by your organization? ......................................................20 17 Corruption in credentials and qualifications ............................................................................................21 18 Possible responses to corruption in credentials and qualifications .......................................................22 19 How often are actions of this type observed by your organization? ......................................................22
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Astros' Sign-Stealing Scandal
    The Astros’ Sign-Stealing Scandal Major League Baseball (MLB) fosters an extremely competitive environment. Tens of millions of dollars in salary (and endorsements) can hang in the balance, depending on whether a player performs well or poorly. Likewise, hundreds of millions of dollars of value are at stake for the owners as teams vie for World Series glory. Plus, fans, players and owners just want their team to win. And everyone hates to lose! It is no surprise, then, that the history of big-time baseball is dotted with cheating scandals ranging from the Black Sox scandal of 1919 (“Say it ain’t so, Joe!”), to Gaylord Perry’s spitter, to the corked bats of Albert Belle and Sammy Sosa, to the widespread use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) in the 1990s and early 2000s. Now, the Houston Astros have joined this inglorious list. Catchers signal to pitchers which type of pitch to throw, typically by holding down a certain number of fingers on their non-gloved hand between their legs as they crouch behind the plate. It is typically not as simple as just one finger for a fastball and two for a curve, but not a lot more complicated than that. In September 2016, an Astros intern named Derek Vigoa gave a PowerPoint presentation to general manager Jeff Luhnow that featured an Excel-based application that was programmed with an algorithm. The algorithm was designed to (and could) decode the pitching signs that opposing teams’ catchers flashed to their pitchers. The Astros called it “Codebreaker.” One Astros employee referred to the sign- stealing system that evolved as the “dark arts.”1 MLB rules allowed a runner standing on second base to steal signs and relay them to the batter, but the MLB rules strictly forbade using electronic means to decipher signs.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic Doping
    Even some Olympic athletes cheat with drugs | Science News for Students 3/16/20, 6:42 AM HEALTH & MEDICINE Even some Olympic athletes cheat with drugs As new ways of doping emerge, scientists develop ways to catch the cheaters Athletes train to get stronger, run faster and jump higher. But some may turn to an illegal short-cut: performance-enhancing drugs. Scientists are working to find these cheaters. JACOB AMMENTORP LUND/ISTOCKPHOTO By Sarah Zielinski August 15, 2016 at 6:00 am MANCHESTER, England — Keen viewers of the Rio Olympics this week may notice that one country’s team is a lot smaller than usual. Russia brought only about 70 percent of the athletes it had expected would compete. Some 30 percent — including all weightlifters and all but one track and field athletes — were banned from the competition. The reason? They were caught up in a cheating scandal. The type of cheating these athletes had participated in is known as “doping.” It involves the use of drugs to improve performance. These drugs have medical purposes for people who are ill. But in healthy athletes, they can provide an illegal advantage by boosting muscle growth or offering other benefits. And it’s not just using these substances that can get an athlete in trouble. Athletes also can get banned for refusing to participate in (or tampering with) efforts to find others who use doping drugs. The Russian scandal involved an elaborate plot to https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/even-some-olympic-athletes-cheat-drugs Page 1 of 5 Even some Olympic athletes cheat with drugs | Science News for Students 3/16/20, 6:42 AM interfere with these tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverage and Outreach
    Global Carbon Project – Future Earth Carbon Budget 2017 Published 13 November 2017 Coverage and Outreach News agency promo-poster in Melbourne, Australia, 14 Nov. 2017 This document gives an overview of the coverage and outreach of the Global Carbon Budget 2017 release and associated publications and activities. It is intended to inform the team on how their work was reported and perceived worldwide. It is not exhaustive but still provides much detail to guide future outreach efforts. PRODUCTS 13 NOV 2018 1. Three papers (ESSD-CorinneL, NatureCC-GlenP, ERL-RobJ) 2. Data and ppt 3. GCP carbon budget webpage updates 4. Global Carbon Atlas updates 5. One Infographic 6. One Video (English, Spanish) 7. Two blogs (The Conversation-Pep, CarbonBrief-Glen) 8. Seven press releases (UEA, CICERO, Stanford University, CSIR-South Africa, China-Fundan University, Future Earth, European Climate Foundation) 9. Multiple Twitter and Facebook feeds. 10. Key Messages document (internal) SUMMARY OF COVERAGE AND OUTREACH • Media outlet coverage within the first week after publication (print and online; based on Meltwater searches on “Global Carbon Project”, “Global Carbon Budget”, “Global Carbon Budget 2017” and “2017 Global Carbon Budget” run by European Climate Foundation): Global coverage in 99 countries with a total of 2,792 media items (this count doesn’t include UK media), in 27 different languages. • OECD dominates coverage (particularly USA, UK, France, Germany, Canada, and Australia), but almost equally large coverage in China, India and Brazil (a great leap forward over previous years). South east Asia and Central/South America (except Brazil) some coverage too. Key to this success was working for the first time with the Climate Change Foundation facilitated by Future Earth (Owen, Alistair).
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Recourse for Victims of Gaming Fraud
    SMITH FORMATTED 5.22.17.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/30/17 2:23 PM CHEATER’S JUSTICE: JUDICIAL RECOURSE FOR VICTIMS OF GAMING FRAUD Jordan T. Smith* I. INTRODUCTION Legends of extrajudicial “cheater’s justice” dealt upon gaming con-artists and swindlers have deep historical roots. In the Old West, a card shark may have been shot on sight.1 Later, when the mob (allegedly) ran Las Vegas, a hustler might have been given the choice of “hav[ing] the money and the hammer or [walking] out of here,” but not both.2 Gradually, as gambling became more socially acceptable and government regulation of it increased, disputants transitioned from wielding brutish self-help remedies to pursuing legal retribution.3 Today, courts largely accept that a party cheated in a gambling game can recover any losses in a civil action without necessarily being limited to administrative remedies through a state’s gaming regulators.4 * Mr. Smith is an attorney in Nevada. The views expressed in this Article belong solely to the Author and do not reflect the views of any employer or client. 1 See People v. Grimes, 64 P. 101, 103 (Cal. 1901) (“The deceased may have treated the appellant unfairly and unjustly in the matter of the game of cards, but that treatment gave appellant no legal excuse or justification for taking his life.”); see also State v. Vansant, 80 Mo. 67, 73–74, 1883 WL 9952, *5 (1883); Johnson v. State, 10 S.W. 235, 236 (Tex. App. 1888); State v. Shadwell, 57 P. 281 (Mont. 1899).
    [Show full text]
  • Criminalizing Match-Fixing As America Legalizes Sports Gambling
    Marquette Sports Law Review Volume 31 Issue 1 Fall Article 2 2020 Criminalizing Match-Fixing as America Legalizes Sports Gambling Jodi S. Balsam Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons Repository Citation Jodi S. Balsam, Criminalizing Match-Fixing as America Legalizes Sports Gambling, 31 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 1 () Available at: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol31/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BALSAM – ARTICLE 31.1 12/17/2020 8:47 PM ARTICLES CRIMINALIZING MATCH-FIXING AS AMERICA LEGALIZES SPORTS GAMBLING JODI S. BALSAM INTRODUCTION1 In May 2018, the Supreme Court decided Murphy v. NCAA,2 striking down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) that prohibited states from allowing sports betting.3 At this writing, more than two years after PASPA’s judicial repeal, eighteen states have enacted legal sports betting, five states plus Washington, D.C. have passed legislation that is pending launch, and twenty-four more have introduced sports gambling bills.4 Somewhat myopically, these legislative efforts fail to address the game integrity concerns flagged by the sports leagues and other entities that create the contests on which Associate Professor of Clinical Law, Director of Externship Programs, Brooklyn Law School. I received excellent research assistance from Nick Rybarczyk, Matthew Schechter, Madison Smiley, and Katherine Wilcox. Thank you to Daniel Wallach and to participants in the Brooklyn Law School Faculty Workshop for their time and helpful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Configuring Logos on the DNCS User Guide
    738163 R ev B Configuring Logos on the DNCS User Guide Please Read Important Please read this entire guide. If this guide provides installation or operation instructions, give particular attention to all safety statements included in this guide. Notices Trademark Acknowledgments Cisco and the Cisco logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Cisco and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and other countries. A listing of Cisco's trademarks can be found at www.cisco.com/go/trademarks. Third party trademarks mentioned are the property of their respective owners. The use of the word partner does not imply a partnership relationship between Cisco and any other company. (1009R) Publication Disclaimer Cisco Systems, Inc. assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions that may appear in this publication. We reserve the right to change this publication at any time without notice. This document is not to be construed as conferring by implication, estoppel, or otherwise any license or right under any copyright or patent, whether or not the use of any information in this document employs an invention claimed in any existing or later issued patent. Copyright © 2008, 2010, 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Information in this publication is subject to change without notice. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by photocopy, microfilm, xerography, or any other means, or incorporated into any information retrieval system, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose, without the express permission of Cisco Systems, Inc. Contents About This Guide v Logo Overview 1 Logo Types ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 05-13 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter Of
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 05-13 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition ) MB Docket No. 04-227 in the Market for the Delivery of Video ) Programming ) ELEVENTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: January 14, 2005 Released: February 4, 2005 By the Commission: Chairman Powell issuing a statement; Commissioners Copps and Adelstein concurring and issuing a joint statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph I. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................1 A. Scope of this Report..................................................................................................................2 B. Summary of Findings ..............................................................................................................4 1. The Current State of Competition: 2004 ...................................................................4 2 General Findings .........................................................................................................7 II. COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR THE DELIVERY OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING......16 A. Cable Television Service.......................................................................................................16 1. General Performance.................................................................................................17 2. Capital Acquisition and Disposition.........................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Corked Bats, Juiced Balls, and Humidors: the Physics of Cheating in Baseball ͒ Alan M
    Corked bats, juiced balls, and humidors: The physics of cheating in baseball ͒ Alan M. Nathana Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 ͒ Lloyd V. Smithb and Warren L. Faber School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164 ͒ Daniel A. Russellc Department of Physics, Kettering University, Flint, Michigan 48504 ͑Received 13 September 2010; accepted 14 January 2011͒ Three questions of relevance to Major League Baseball are investigated from a physics perspective. Can a baseball be hit farther with a corked bat? Is there evidence that the baseball is more lively today than in earlier years? Can storing baseballs in a temperature- or humidity-controlled environment significantly affect home run production? These questions are subjected to a physics analysis, including an experiment and an interpretation of the data. The answers to the three questions are no, no, and yes, respectively. © 2011 American Association of Physics Teachers. ͓DOI: 10.1119/1.3554642͔ I. INTRODUCTION II. DESCRIPTION OF THE BAT AND BALL TEST FACILITY Baseball is rich in phenomena that are ripe for a physics analysis. In the last decade there has been an explosion in the All the experimental work for these studies was done at the bat-ball test facility at the Sports Science Laboratory at number of papers addressing interesting issues in baseball 1 from a physics perspective. In this paper we address three Washington State University. The experimental setup is de- picted schematically in Fig. 1. The measurements consisted issues of relevance to Major League Baseball. Although the of firing a baseball from a high-speed air cannon onto a issues are seemingly separate, they all involve the kinematics stationary impact surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Casinos Cheating?
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLS\10-1\HLS102.txt unknown Seq: 1 21-JAN-19 9:04 Casino Countermeasures: Are Casinos Cheating? Ashford Kneitel1 Abstract Since Nevada legalized gambling in 1931, casinos have proliferated into the vast majority of states. In 2015, commercial casinos earned over $40 billion. This is quite an impressive growth for an activity that was once relegated to the backrooms of saloons. Indeed, American casino companies are even expanding into other countries. Casino games have a predetermined set of rules that all players—and the casino itself—must abide by. Many jurisdictions have particularized statutes that allow for the prosecution of players that cheat at these games. Indeed, players have long been prosecuted for marking cards and sliding dice. And casino employees have long been prosecuted for cheating their employers using similar methods. But what happens when casinos cheat their players? To be sure, casinos are unlikely to engage in tradi- tional methods of cheating for fear of losing their licenses. Instead, this cheating takes the form of perfectly suitable—at least in the casinos’ eyes—game protection counter- measures. This Article argues that some of these countermeasures are analogous to traditional forms of cheating and should be treated as such by regulators and courts. In addition, many countermeasures are the product of a bygone era—and serve only to slow down games and reduce state and local tax revenues. Part II discusses the various ways that cheating occurs in casino games. These methods include traditional cheating techniques used by players and casino employees. An emphasis will be placed on how courts have adjudicated such matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Esports Consumer Views on Match- Fixing: Effects on Gambling Awareness and Game Integrity
    Esports consumer views on match- fixing: Effects on gambling awareness and game integrity What this research is about The increasing popularity of video games has created What you need to know an interest in esports betting, which is betting on the The money available from betting on esports outcomes of professional video gaming the same way (professional video game competitions) can someone would bet on a sports event. Esports also influence some players to engage in match-fixing. comes with new ways for players to cheat, such as The researchers analyzed survey responses from using software that is not part of the game, or hacking people who participate in online gaming opponents. Match-fixing, when a player intentionally communities, either as spectators or bettors, on loses so that someone can win a bet, happens in their views toward match-fixing in esports. esports as it does in real life sports. If gamblers and Respondents thought that match-fixing was viewers start to believe that a sport or esport is losing harmful to the gaming industry, but also thought its integrity due to match-fixing, that industry will be that it was less severe than other forms of negatively impacted. This research focuses on cheating. They suggested that it should not have discovering the beliefs and understanding that esports heavy punishments, especially if the player is consumers have about match-fixing. young or in great financial need. Many respondents overlooked some of the complex What the researchers did influences on esports betting, suggesting that The Esports Integrity Coalition (ESIC) sent a survey on there needs to be more information available to SurveyMonkey to people on the mailing lists for game spectators.
    [Show full text]
  • Sportsmanship, Gamesmanship, and Cheating
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Robert Daly/OJO© Jones images/Getty Images. & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION CHAPTER 2 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FORSportsmanship, SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning,Gamesmanship, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION and Cheating © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION age by using text messaging to get answers or ▸ How People Win “Googling” during exams. Everyone likes to win! Adults and children Cheating in one’s private life ultimately leads to negative outcomes for the cheater © Jones &alike Bartlett enjoy the Learning, exuberance ofLLC winning, but it © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC is also clear that some people like to win more while affecting other people and business inter- NOT FORthan SALE others. OR The DISTRIBUTION subject of this chapter is how ests. CheatingNOT in FOR one’s SALEpersonal ORlife can DISTRIBUTION trans- people win. Should we concern ourselves with late to lost income—this can certainly occur how people get into the winner’s circle, or by if you are a world-class athlete. Professional what means they use to prevail? After all, no Golf Association (PGA) golfer Tiger Woods’ one remembers who finished second in the marital infidelities were splashed across world © Jones & Bartlett Learning,Super Bowl. LLC © Jonesheadlines & Bartlett when Learning,his conduct LLCwas exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Media Reform Models of Progressive Television Journalists
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Reforming the American Public Sphere: The Media Reform Models of Progressive Television Journalists in the Era of Internet Convergence and Neoliberalism A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Adam Richard Fish 2012 © Copyright by Adam Richard Fish 2012 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Reforming the American Public Sphere: The Media Reform Models of Progressive Television Journalists in the Era of Internet Convergence and Neoliberalism by Adam Richard Fish Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology University of California, Los Angeles, 2012 Professor Sherry B. Ortner, Chair Based on ethnographic data, this dissertation analyzes the broadcasting and media reformative models of workers in American television and internet video news networks. Media reform broadcasters seek to diversify the American public sphere as a counterhegemonic movement through recursively using technology and policy to create access for increased diversity of voice. Their challenges illustrate the problems for democracy in a neoliberal state. ii This dissertation of Adam Richard Fish is approved. Christopher Kelty Akhil Gupta John T. Caldwell Sherry B. Ortner, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2012 iii Dedicated to my grandparents Mary and Dick Cook and my wife and daughter, Robin and Isis Viola Lune Fish. iv INTRODUCTION: THE CULTURAL INTERVENTIONS OF MEDIA REFORM BROADCASTERS 1 REACTIVE DISCOURSES AND THE MODELS OF MEDIA REFORM BROADCASTERS
    [Show full text]