DOCSLIB.ORG

For Official Use Only (Fouo) This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For Official Use Only (Fouo) This Page Intentionally Left Blank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THE FIRST COMMAND A REVIEW OF THE 47TH FLYING TRAINING WING OFFICER MISCONDUCT AND 19TH AIR FORCE FLYING TRAINING CULTURE 31 OCTOBER 2018 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CDI TASK 2A ............................................................................................................................... 90 Overview ................................................................................................................................... 90 Gender Demographics ............................................................................................................... 91 Survey Methodology .................................................................................................................. 95 Discrimination ........................................................................................................................ 95 Sexual Harassment ................................................................................................................. 96 Reporting/Preventing Mistreatment....................................................................................... 96 Unwanted Workplace Experiences ......................................................................................... 97 Bullying .................................................................................................................................. 98 Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 98 Survey Results, ....................................................................................................................... 98 Observed Hostility Score. .................................................................................................... 98 Bullying. ............................................................................................................................. 99 Focus Groups and Individual Interviews .................................................................................. 99 Benevolent Sexism. .......................................................................................................... 101 Social Policing. .................................................................................................................. 101 Gender Micro-Aggressions. ............................................................................................... 102 The Importance of Leadership Action. ............................................................................... 102 Reporting Mechanisms. .................................................................................................... 103 No-Notice Visual Inspection of Squadron Areas .................................................................... 103 Equality Opportunity (EO) Database ..................................................................................... 104 Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute Organizational Climate Survey (DEOCS) ... 104 Unprofessionalism in the Simulator Environment. .................................................................... 105 Findings ................................................................................................................................... 107 CDI TASK 2B ............................................................................................................................. 110 Overview ................................................................................................................................. 110 Survey Methodology ................................................................................................................ 111 Toxic Leadership Scale – Supervisors .................................................................................... 111 Toxic Leadership Scale – Instructors ...................................................................................... 112 Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 112 Survey Results ...................................................................................................................... 112 3 - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) DEOMI Organizational Climate Survey (DEOCS)/Unit Effectiveness Inspection Data ............... 113 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 113 Findings ................................................................................................................................... 114 CDI TASK 2C ............................................................................................................................. 116 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 116 Alcohol in the Formal Training Environment ......................................................................... 116 Reporting ............................................................................................................................. 117 Accountability ...................................................................................................................... 118 Qualities of a Professional .................................................................................................... 119 Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 119 Findings ................................................................................................................................... 121 CDI TASK 3 ............................................................................................................................... 124 Overview ................................................................................................................................. 124 Assignment Process ................................................................................................................. 124 Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 127 Findings ................................................................................................................................... 134 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 136 Organizational and Training Culture ......................................................................................... 136 Recommendation 1: ............................................................................................................. 136 Recommendation 2: ............................................................................................................. 136 Recommendation 3: ............................................................................................................. 136 Recommendation 4: ............................................................................................................. 136 Recommendation 5: ............................................................................................................. 136 Leadership Environment and Oversight .................................................................................... 136 Recommendation 6: ............................................................................................................. 136 Recommendation 7: ............................................................................................................. 137 Recommendation 8: ............................................................................................................. 137 Barriers to Reporting by Students and Instructors .................................................................... 137 Recommendation 9: ............................................................................................................. 137 4 - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) Recommendation 10: ........................................................................................................... 137 Recommendation 11: ........................................................................................................... 137 Institutional Policies and Safeguards ........................................................................................ 138 Recommendation 12: ........................................................................................................... 138 Recommendation 13: ........................................................................................................... 138 Recommendation 14: ........................................................................................................... 138 Recommendation 15: ........................................................................................................... 138 Recommendation 16: ........................................................................................................... 138 Recommendation 17: ........................................................................................................... 138 Recommendation 18: ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Laughlin Air Force Base, USA
    Laughlin Air Force Base, USA Email Article Print Link To Us Related Projects Key Data Type Military Training Base Location Val Verde County, near Del Rio, Texas Built March 1943 Owner US Air Force Operator Air Education and Training Command Controller United States (US) Occupants 47th Flying Training Wing Full specifications Laughlin Air Force Base is a military training base situated 8km east of Del Rio in Texas, US. It is the United States Air Force's biggest pilot training base. The base is owned by the United States Air Force and operated by Air Education and Training Command. History Laughlin Air Force Base was established in March 1943 Expand Image under the designation A technical sergeant Laughlin Army Air Field. monitors air traffic at Built on a 15.2km² site near Laughlin Air Force Base. the border of the US and Mexico, the field was named in the honour of Second World War martyr Jack T Laughlin. It was renamed as Laughlin Field in November 1943 and later became Army Air Force Auxiliary Field, which Expand Image was shut down in October The directorate of the T-6 1945. Services resumed in maintenance division May 1952. examines a T-6 Texan II parked at Laughlin Air The Crew Training Air Force acquired Army Air Force Auxiliary Field in October Force Base. 1952. Pilot training was initially carried out using the F-80 Shooting Star, F-84 Thunderjet and T-33 jet. The F-80 and F-84 were later removed from service. Missions were later shifted to Williams Air Force Base in Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • PREEDOM 2354 Fairchild Dr., Suite 6H-126 USAF Academy, CO 80840-5099 (719) 333-8259 [email protected]
    MAJOR CONRAD A. PREEDOM 2354 Fairchild Dr., Suite 6H-126 USAF Academy, CO 80840-5099 (719) 333-8259 [email protected] TEACHING EXPERIENCE Assistant Professor of Management, Director of Curriculum, US Air Force Academy, CO, 2009-Present Coordinated over 200 classes annually for 35 faculty members and over 600 cadets; developed curriculum for advanced management courses; provided classroom instruction to 12 sections of cadets over 5 semesters in multiple upper-level courses; provided focused professional mentorship to more 30 cadets. Diamond Star T-52A Instructor Pilot, US Air Force Academy, CO, 2008-Present Performed Instructor Pilot duties in a single-engine Diamond Star DA-40 trainer aircraft; provided instruction to seasoned Air Force pilots as well as US Air Force Academy cadets both in and out of the cockpit. Cessna T-37B Instructor Pilot, Laughlin Air Force Base, TX, 2000-2003 Performed Instructor Pilot duties at the US Air Force’s largest pilot training base in Air Force’s primary jet trainer; provided both classroom instruction and flight instruction in all aspects of flying to include traffic patterns/landings, aerobatic flight, spin training, instrument flying, formation flying and both day and night cross country navigation. Schweitzer 2-33 Instructor Pilot, US Air Force Academy, CO, 1995-1998 Performed Instructor Pilot duties in the US Air Force Academy’s Soar for All program; provided flight-line and sailplane cockpit instruction to 5 semesters of cadets with a focus on aero-tow, primary maneuvering, traffic patterns
    [Show full text]
  • 47Th FLYING TRAINING WING
    47th FLYING TRAINING WING MISSION The 47th Flying Training Wing conducts joint specialized undergraduate pilot training for the United States Air Force, Air Force Reserve, Air National Guard and allied nation air forces utilizing the T-37, T-38 and T-1A aircraft. The 47th FTW commands a flying operation which exceeds 105,000 flying hours and 90,000 sorties per year. It is composed of more than 1,300 military personnel, 1,124 civilian employees and a total base community exceeding 4,200 people. LINEAGE 47th Bombardment Wing, Light, established, 28 Jul 1947 Organized, 15 Aug 1947 Inactivated, 2 Oct 1949 Activated, 12 Mar 1951 Redesignated 47th Bombardment Wing, Tactical, 1 Oct 1955 Discontinued and inactivated, 22 Jun 1962 Redesignated 47th Flying Training Wing, 22 Mar 1972 Activated, 1 Sep 1972 STATIONS Biggs Field (later, AFB), TX, 15 Aug 1947 Barksdale AFB, LA, 19 Nov 1948-2 Oct 1949 Langley AFB, VA, 12 Mar 1951-21 May 1952 Sculthorpe RAF Station (later, RAF Sculthorpe), England, 1 Jun 1952-22 Jun 1962 Laughlin AFB, TX, 1 Sep 1972 ASSIGNMENTS Twelfth Air Force, 15 Aug 1947-2 Oct 1949 Tactical Air Command, 12 Mar 1951 Third Air Force, 5 Jun 1952 Seventeenth Air Force, 1 Jul 1961-22 Jun 1962 Air Training Command, 1 Sep 1972 Nineteenth Air Force, 1 Jul 1993 ATTACHMENTS 49th Air Division, Operational, l2 Feb 1952-1 Jul 1956 WEAPON SYSTEMS A (later, B)-26, 1947 B-45, 1949 B-45, 1951 B-26, 1951 RB-45, 1954 B-66, 1958 KB-50, 1960 T-41, 1972 T-37, 1972 T-38, 1972 T-1, 1993 T-6, 2002 COMMANDERS Col William M.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Pilot Training (APT T-X) Aircraft and 46 Ground-Based Training Systems (GBTS) to Replace the Existing Fleet of T-38C Jet Trainers
    Air Force T-7A Red Hawk Trainer Updated September 18, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44856 Air Force T-7A Red Hawk Trainer Summary NOTE: This report was originally written by Ceir Coral while he was an Air Force Fellow at the Congressional Research Service. Since his departure, it has been maintained by Jeremiah Gertler of CRS. On September 27, 2018, the United States Air Force (USAF) awarded The Boeing Company a contract, worth up to $9.2 billion, to procure 351 Advanced Pilot Training (APT T-X) aircraft and 46 Ground-Based Training Systems (GBTS) to replace the existing fleet of T-38C jet trainers. The Air Force had originally valued the contract at roughly $19.7 billion. Information on the value of other competitors’ bids was not available. On September 16, 2019, Acting Secretary of the Air Force Matthew Donovan announced that in service, the T-X aircraft would be known as the T-7A Red Hawk. In this report, “APT T-X” will be used to identify the entire training system, while “T-7A” will refer to the aircraft portion of that system. The FY2020 Administration budget request included $348.473 million for the APT T-X. According to the USAF, the current T-38C trainer fleet is old, costly, and outdated, and lacks the technology to train future pilots for fifth-generation fighter and bomber operations. Based on Air Education Training Command’s evaluation of the required capabilities to train future pilots for fifth-generation fighters and bombers, the T-38C falls short in 12 of 18 capabilities, forcing the USAF to train for those capabilities in operational units where flying hours are costly and can affect fleet readiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Adapt Or Fail: the USAF's Role in Reconstituting the Iraqi Air Force
    AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Adapt or Fail The United States Air Force’s Role in Reconstituting the Iraqi Air Force, 2004–2007 George w. Cully, jd Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Belinda Bazinet Names: Cully, George W., 1946- author. | Air University Copy Editor (U.S.). Air Force Research Institute, issuing body. | Sandi Davis Air University (U.S.). Press, publisher. Title: Adapt or fail : the USAF’s role in reconstituting Cover Art, Book Design and Illustrations the Iraqi Air Force 2004-2007 / George W. Cully. Daniel Armstrong Description: First edition. | Maxwell Air Force Base, Composition and Prepress Production Alabama : Air University Press, Air Force Research Nedra O. Looney Institute, 2016. | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: LCCN 2016043990| ISBN 9781585662692 | Print Preparation and Distribution ISBN 1585662690 Diane Clark Subjects: LCSH: Air forces—Iraq| Air power—Iraq— History. | Coalition Provisional Authority. Coalition Military Advisory Transition Team. | Coalition Provisional Authority. CMATT-A. | United States— Armed Forces—Stability operations. Classification: LCC UG635.I72 C85 2016 | DDC 956.7044/348–dc23 | SUDOC D 301.26/6:IR 1 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016043990 AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS Director and Publisher Published by Air University Press in February 2017 Dale L. Hayden, PhD Editor in Chief Oreste M. Johnson Managing Editor Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Design and Production Manager Disclaimer Cheryl King Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do Air University Press 600 Chennault Circle, Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • “Air Force 101” a Handbook for Air Force Spouses
    “Air Force 101” A Handbook for Air Force Spouses This handbook is not designed to answer all your Air Force questions. We hope to provide you with enough information that you know what questions to ask, and who to ask them of. And to understand the answers, when you get them! I’d like to thank everyone at bases around the world who supplied essential information used in this handbook! A special thanks to all the spouses on AF Crossroad’s Spouse Forum at www.afcrossroads.com, for showing me what questions to answer – and giving me a lot of the answers themselves! You’re all terrific! Our Air Force active duty members couldn’t accomplish their mission without your caring, support, hard work and adaptability. The information in this handbook is accurate to the best of my knowledge. If anyone finds that any of these facts are not correct, please let me know, and I’ll make the necessary corrections. Family Support Center, Hill AFB, Utah mailto:[email protected] Updated: 13 August 2003 1 Table of Contents The Ten Commandments of a Military Spouse 3 Military Acronyms 4 Common Military Phrases 7 Military Time 9 Military ABCs 10 Operations Security 11 Force Protection Conditions 12 Family Support Center overview 13 Overview of other useful base agencies 17 Base Exchange (BX) and Commissary 19 AF Chain of Command & Organization of the AF 20 Aerospace Expeditionary Forces (AEFs) 22 Major Air Force Bases Around the World 24 What to expect when your spouse is in Basic Military Training 26 AF Technical Training 28 AF Officer Training School (OTS)
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey System to Assess Abuse and Misconduct Toward Air Force Students in Occupational Specialty Training
    C O R P O R A T I O N A Survey System to Assess Abuse and Misconduct Toward Air Force Students in Occupational Specialty Training Laura L. Miller, Coreen Farris, Marek N. Posard, Miriam Matthews, Kirsten M. Keller, Sean Robson, Stephanie Brooks Holliday, Mauri Matsuda, Rachel M. Burns, Lisa Wagner, Barbara Bicksler For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2692 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0203-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents a RAND Corporation study designed to adapt a survey system for monitoring abuse and misconduct in the Air Force Basic Military Training (BMT) environment to extend it to the next stages of the Air Force technical training and flying training environments.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Texas Aerospace, Aviation and Defense Aerospace and Aviation in Texas
    2017 TExas aerospace, aviation and defense Aerospace and Aviation in Texas Texas is one of the most important locations for the global concentration of aerospace manufacturing workers, as well aerospace and aviation industry. As home to the headquarters as the headquarters of American Airlines and Southwest of two international airlines and two of the world’s busiest Airlines. San Antonio, sometimes referred to as “Military airports, as well as NASA’s world-famous Johnson Space City USA,” is home to tens of thousands of U.S. Air Force Center, the state is key for many of the largest global personnel and is a major national hub for aircraft maintenance, aerospace and aviation companies. repair and overhaul (MRO). The broad range of aerospace activities in Texas includes On the Gulf Coast, Houston is the legendary home to NASA fighter plane and helicopter assembly, navigation instrument mission control and dozens of related spaceflight contractor development, advanced space-flight research, military pilot firms. Elsewhere in the state, one of the world’s largest training, and commercial space travel. The aerospace and helicopter repair facilities resides in Corpus Christi, while aviation industry directly employs more than 135,000 Texas the cities of Amarillo, El Paso, Harlingen, McAllen, Waco, workers at approximately 1,300 firms. and Wichita Falls all support manufacturing facilities for various Fortune 500 aerospace companies. Major Fixed Geographically, the aerospace and aviation industry has a Base Operators (FBOs) have locations in Texas providing substantial presence in many regions of the state. In North sales and service for their general aviation (GA)OVERVIEW and business Texas, the Dallas-Fort Worth region boasts the state’s largest aviation (BA) customers.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES Loan Act of 1933, As Amended; Making Appropriations for the Depart­ S
    1955 .CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE 9249 ment of the Senate to the bill CH. R. ministering oaths and taking acknowledg­ Keller in ·behalf of physically handicapped 4904) to extend the Renegotiation Act ments by offi.cials of Federal penal and cor­ persons throughout ·the world. of 1951for2 years, and requesting a con­ rectional institutions; and H. R. 4954. An act to amend the Clayton The message also announced that the ference with the Senate on the disagree­ Act by granting a right of action to the Senate agrees to the amendments of the ing votes·of the two Houses thereon. United States to recover damages under the House to a joint resolution of the Sen­ Mr. BYRD. I move that the Senate antitrust laws, establishing a uniform ate of the following title: insist upon its amendment, agree to the statute of limitati9ns, and for other purposes. request of the House for a conference, S. J. Res. 67. Joint resolution to authorize The message also announced that the the Secretary of Commerce to sell certain and ~hat the Chair appoint the conferees Senate had passed bills and a concur­ vessels to citizens of the Republic of the on the part of the Senate. Philippines; to provide for the rehabilita­ The motion was agreed to; and the rent resolution of the following titles, in tion of the interisland commerce of the Acting President pro tempore appointed which the concurrence of the House is Philippines, and for other purposes. Mr. BYRD, Mr. GEORGE, Mr. KERR, Mr. requested: The message also announced that th~ MILLIKIN, and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Generations of Chevrons a History of the Enlisted Force
    Generations of Chevrons A History of the Enlisted Force ★ Edited by Janet R. Bednarek Generations of Chevrons A History of the Enlisted Force ★ Edited by Janet R. Bednarek AIR FORCE HISTORY AND MUSEUMS PROGRAM UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. 2004 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the au- thor(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of the Air Force History and Museums Program, the U.S. Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other U.S. Government agency. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Generations of chevrons : a history of the enlisted force / edited by Janet R. Bednarek. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. United States. Air Force—Non-commissioned officers—Biography. 2. United States—Biogra- phy. I. Bednarek, Janet R. Daly (Janet Rose Daly), 1959- 9- UG626.G44 2004 358.4’0092’2—dc222 2004026962 ★ This book is dedicated to the memory of four great chief master sergeants of the Air Force: CMSAF DONALD L. HARLOW 1920–1997 CMSAF RICHARD D. KISLING 1923–1985 CMSAF ARTHUR L. “BUD” ANDREWS 1934–1996 CMSAF THOMAS N. BARNES 1930–2003 CONTENTS Preface . ix Foreword . xi Introduction . 1 CHIEF MASTER SERGEANTS OF THE AIR FORCE Paul W. Airey. 45 Donald L. Harlow . 57 Richard D. Kisling. 69 Thomas N. Barnes. 81 Robert D. Gaylor . 93 James M. McCoy. 105 Arthur L. “Bud” Andrews. 117 Sam E. Parish . 129 James C. Binnicker . 141 Gary R. Pfingston . 153 David J. Campanale. 167 Eric W. Benken . 179 Frederick J. Finch . 191 Gerald R.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force World by Aaron M
    Air Force World By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor Welsh Becomes Chief of Staff head of the National Guard Bureau, Gen. Mark A. Welsh III succeeded succeeding Air Force Gen. Craig R. Gen. Norton A. Schwartz on Aug. 10, McKinley, who is retiring. McKinley was screenshot becoming the 20th Chief of Staff of the the first head of the Guard Bureau to be Air Force, after the Senate lifted a hold a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. on his nomination two weeks before. Welsh, most recently head of US Air Nineteenth Air Force Stands Down Forces in Europe, is a command pilot Air Education and Training Com- with more than 3,400 hours in the F-16, mand inactivated 19th Air Force, which USAF photo by SSgt. Sheila deVera A-10, and training aircraft. Before that, oversaw the command’s flight training he served as associate director of the mission for nearly two decades, in a Central Intelligence Agency, for military ceremony at JBSA-Randolph, Tex., affairs. He is a 1976 graduate of the US July 17. Air Force Academy. “Nineteenth Air Force led the stand-up The Senate confirmed Welsh on of the F-35 [strike fighter] schoolhouse Aug. 2 after Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) and the Air Force’s only undergraduate lifted a hold on his nomination. Cornyn remotely piloted aircraft training pro- placed the hold because he wanted gram for pilots and sensor operators. The reassurances the Air Force would unit also activated student squadrons, address the underlying causes of sex streamlining the administrative control abuse by military training instructors at of the nearly 1,400 student pilots who JBSA-Lackland, Tex.
    [Show full text]