Olympic Legacy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Olympic Movement
OLYMPIC LEGACY 2013 “Creating sustainable legacies 1WHAT IS OLYMPIC LEGACY? 5 is a fundamental commitment SPORTING LEGACY 13 2 of the Olympic Movement. 1 3SOCIAL LEGACIES 23 Every city that hosts the 4ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACIES 33 Olympic Games becomes a temporary steward of the 5URBAN LEGACIES 45 Olympic Movement. It is a great 6ECONOMIC LEGACIES 55 responsibility. It is also a great 7CONCLUSION 65 opportunity. Host cities capture worldwide attention. Each has a once-in-a-lifetime chance to showcase the celebration of the human spirit. And each creates a unique set of environmental, social and economic legacies that can change a community, a region, and a nation forever.” Jacques Rogge, IOC President International Olympic Committee Château de Vidy – C.P. 356 – CH-1007 Lausanne / Switzerland Tel. +41 21 621 61 11 – Fax +41 21 621 62 16 www.olympic.org Published by the International Olympic Committee – March 2013 All rights reserved Printing by Didwedo S.à.r.l., Lausanne, Switzerland Printed in Switzerland 2 3 4 WHAT IS OLYMPIC LEGACY? 1 A LASTING LEGACY The Olympic Games have the power to deliver lasting benefits which 6 can considerably change a community, its image and its infrastructure. 7 As one of the world’s largest sporting events, the Games can be a tremendous catalyst for change in a host city with the potential to create far more than just good memories once the final medals have been awarded. Each edition of the Olympic Games also provides significant legacies for the Olympic Movement as a whole, helping to spread the Olympic values around the world. -
A Real Options Analysis of Olympic Village Development: How Design Flexibility Adds Value
A Real Options Analysis of Olympic Village Development: How Design Flexibility Adds Value by Robert J. Martinson B.S.E., Chemical Engineering, 1998 University of Michigan Submitted to the Center for Real Estate in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September, 2009 ©2009 Robert J. Martinson All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author Center for Real Estate July 24, 2009 Certified by ______________________________________________________________________ David Geltner Professor of Real Estate Finance, Department of Urban Studies and Planning Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Brian A. Ciochetti Chairman, Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development A Real Options Analysis of Olympic Village Development: How Design Flexibility Adds Value by Robert J. Martinson Submitted to the Center for Real Estate on July 24, 2009 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development ABSTRACT This thesis applies past research on real options – a right, but not an obligation to take some action on a real asset in the future – to a very specific type of real estate development related to Olympic Village development. The Olympics have been previously criticized for the excessive cost of preparation for the 16 or 17 day event. Chicago, if selected to host the 2016 Summer Games, could be faced with many of the same challenges of past cities. -
Lillehammer Olympic Park
LILLEHAMMER OLYMPIC PARK Olympic City: Lillehammer Country: Norway Edition of the Games: 1994 Winter Olympic Games Preliminary remarks As you may have seen, two governance cases are dedicated to Lillehammer. Reasons that support this choice are twofold. First, Lillehammer hosted two editions of the Games. If the latter built upon the former to deliver great Games, it also produced its own legacy and consequently, structures to deal with it. Second, as legacy is about both venues and facilities at one side and education, knowledge transfer and experience sharing at the other side, two different cases were necessary to encompass various ways Lillehammer manages its Olympic legacy(ies). Inherited from the 1994 Games, the Lillehammer Olympic Park is a structure run by the municipality of Lillehammer that takes care of the majority of Olympic venues and events. The Lillehammer Olympic Legacy Sports Centre is an emanation of the Norwegian Sports Federation and Olympic and Paralympic Committee and is a direct legacy of the YOG. Obviously, many bridges and crossovers exist between these structures and collaboration and common understanding are key. The big picture also encloses the Norwegian Top Sports Centre of the Innland region dedicated to elite athletes (Olympiatoppen Innlandet), the University, the Olympic Legacy Studies Centre as well as the remaining Olympic venues run by other municipalities or private companies. With all these partners involved in managing Lillehammer’s Olympic legacy, clusters (venues, events, training, research, etc.) facilitate organisation and legacy management. Toolkit: Keeping the Flame Alive – Lillehammer Olympic Park 1 World Union of Olympic Cities 2019 HOW LEGACY GOVERNANCE STARTED IN LILLEHAMMER Since 1990 Lillehammer & Oppland https://www.olympiaparken.no/en/ • • • WHEN WHERE WEB ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… “The XVII Winter Olympics did not exist. -
The Australia Stadium
THE AUSTRALIA STADIUM SYDNEY’S OLYMPIC STADIUM HAS BEEN THE LARGEST Stadium Australia FACILITY IN THE HISTORY OF THE GAMES. TODAY, FOLLOWING A RE-STRUCTURING, IT IS THE ONLY ONE IN THE Capacity: 83,500, 81,500 (Oval) WORLD THAT CAN HOST FIVE DIFFERENT SPORTS AND STILL Opening: March 1999 IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW HIGH QUALITY DESIGN AND Capacity during the Olympics: 110,000 RESPECT FOR THE ENVIRONMENT CAN HAPPILY CO-EXIST. Cost: $ 690 million Australian Start of work construction: September 1996 Restructuring: From October 2001 to October 2003 Owner: Stadium Australia Group Project: Populous (Bligh Lobb Sports Architects) Hosted sports: Australian Rules football, rugby 13, rugby 15, football, cricket (Australia) THE LARGEST OLYMPIC STADIUM TO DATE Stadium Australia was built to host the 2000 Sydney Olympic and Paralympic Games. The facility is located in Sydney’s suburb of Homebush, in the middle of the Olympic Park of the Australian city. When it was inaugurated, due to its 110,000 seats, it immediately conquered the “largest Olympic stadium in the world” title and at the same time it is the largest in Australia. The structure was designed and built with the intent of respecting demanding environmental conditions: compared to other Olympic stadiums (Athens and Beijing), as an example, less steel was used. The construction was started in September 1996 and completed just two and a half years later: on March 6, 1999, Sydney’s Olympic Stadium saw its first sport event: two rugby13 matches watched by 104,583 spectators. From October 2001 to October 2003, Stadium Australia was refurbished to make it the only stadium in the world capable of hosting five different professional sports: Rugby13 league, Rugby15 (Union), Australian Football, Soccer and Cricket. -
MATCHING SPORTS EVENTS and HOSTS Published April 2013 © 2013 Sportbusiness Group All Rights Reserved
THE BID BOOK MATCHING SPORTS EVENTS AND HOSTS Published April 2013 © 2013 SportBusiness Group All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publisher. The information contained in this publication is believed to be correct at the time of going to press. While care has been taken to ensure that the information is accurate, the publishers can accept no responsibility for any errors or omissions or for changes to the details given. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements including forecasts are not guarantees of future performance or results and involve risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted or quantified and, consequently, the actual performance of companies mentioned in this report and the industry as a whole may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Author: David Walmsley Publisher: Philip Savage Cover design: Character Design Images: Getty Images Typesetting: Character Design Production: Craig Young Published by SportBusiness Group SportBusiness Group is a trading name of SBG Companies Ltd a wholly- owned subsidiary of Electric Word plc Registered office: 33-41 Dallington Street, London EC1V 0BB Tel. +44 (0)207 954 3515 Fax. +44 (0)207 954 3511 Registered number: 3934419 THE BID BOOK MATCHING SPORTS EVENTS AND HOSTS Author: David Walmsley THE BID BOOK MATCHING SPORTS EVENTS AND HOSTS -
ROTCI4 LIBRARIES 2 Enriching the Legacy of Athens' 2004 Olympic Village: the Role of Information Technology Infrastructure
Enriching the Legacy of Athens' 2004 Olympic Village: The Role of Information Technology Infrastructure by Sotiris A. Biziouras Diploma in Planning and Regional Development Engineering University of Thessaly, Volos - Greece, 1997 Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2000 © 2000 Sotiris A. Biziouras All Rights Reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Author epartment of Urban Studies and Planning May 12, 2000 Certified by J. Ma chuster, Professor of Urban Cultural Policy f (Department of Urban Studies and Planning Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Paul Smoke, Associate Professor MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Chair, MCP Committee OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Urban Studies and Planning AUG 0 2 2000 ROTCI4 LIBRARIES 2 Enriching the Legacy of Athens' 2004 Olympic Village: The Role of Information Technology Infrastructure by Sotiris A. Biziouras Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 12, 2000 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in City Planning Abstract The year is 2004. Athens, the capital of Greece is hosting the Olympic Games for the first time in 108 years. Athens, to accommodate the needs of the XXVIII Olympiad, has altered the form of the city through major infrastructure projects. The Olympic Village, as one of these projects, is a place with significant information infrastructure and transformation capabilities that will contribute to the future development of Athens. -
2005 Annual Report
Contents Achievements & Highlights Achievements and Highlights 1 • The Australian Sports Commission confirms its ongoing support for the Netball program by increasing financial support to the game Goals, Objectives and Core Values 2 • The 1963 Australian Netball Team acknowledged by the Sport Australia Hall of Fame • Netball Australia rebrands with a new corporate logo and identity President’s Report 4 • The new High Performance Program is developed and adopted CEO’s Report 6 • The new national database and membership system is confirmed for rollout Board of Directors 10 • A national merchandise and licensing strategy is developed and adopted • Netball Australia attracts new corporate partners in Medibank Private and McDonald’s as sponsor of the Adelaide Thunderbirds and Hunter Jaegers Organisation 11 • Commonwealth Bank Trophy expands to regional centres of Townsville, Darwin, Geelong, Wollongong and Eaton Corporate Structure 11 • Liz Ellis becomes Australia’s most capped International player at 105 Test Matches Community Development and Membership 12 • Netball Australia is inspired to visit the remote Northern Territory Community of Maningrida following its team’s entry in to the Northern Territory regional school girls championships High Performance 14 • Record number of spectators attend the Commonwealth Bank Trophy competition Australian Team 16 • Established working relationship with Australian Netball Players Association Junior Teams and Nationals 18 • Melbourne Phoenix win their 5th Commonwealth Bank Trophy Competition • Preparations -
How Green the Games/New
Australia Pacific www.greenpeace.org.au Sydney Office 4/39 Liverpool Street Sydney NSW GPO Box 3307 Sydney NSW 2001 Tel: 61 (0)2 9261 4666 Freecall 1800 815 151 Fax: 61 (0)2 9261 4588 International Keizersgracht 176, 1016 DW Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel: 31 20 523 62 22 Fax: 31 20 523 62 00 www.greenpeace.org GREENPEACE’S ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SYDNEY 2000 OLYMPICS GIVE THE PLANET A SPORTING CHANCE How green the Games? GREENPEACE’S ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SYDNEY 2000 OLYMPICS A production of Greenpeace International & Greenpeace Australia Pacific Researched, Written and Edited by: Blair Palese, Corin Millais, Rupert Posner, Fiona Koza, Elisabeth Mealey, Warren McLaren, Darryl Luscombe, Matt Ruchel, Mark Oakwood, Tanja Dam, Gabriella Wuelser, Sybrand Landman, Danielle Stewart, Jo Shepherd and Linda Apps. Special Thanks To: Karla Bell for the original campaign idea Maria Atkinson, Bovis Lend Lease Peter Ottesen, SOCOG Camilla Edwards,OCA Andrzej Listowski, OCA Russell Peel, Foster’s Brewing Nicholas Cox, Earthcare Brent Hoare, Greenchill Ladas Taylor, Greenchill Paul Blacklock, Calorgas Kevin Sansome, Elgas Birte Carstensen, Danfoss Compressors Jacqui Courtney and staff at SEDA Rod Simpson, Allen Jack & Cottier A number of architects, developers, suppliers and contractors also gave freely of their time, including: Declan Brennan, Bryce Christian, Andrew Dunn, Craig Gilbert, Steve King, Stuart Morris, Richard Polkinghorn, Jeff Profke, David Shaw, Greg Taylor, Colin Wyllie and many other valu- able contributors too numerous to mention. September 2000 ISBN: 1 876221 08 9 Cover photos: © Anthony Edgar. Designed by Pulse Design, Sydney, Australia How green the Games? Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................7 Lessons Learned ........................................................................................................8 Chapter 1. -
Protecting the Games the International Olympic Committee and Security, 1972-1984
Protecting the Games The International Olympic Committee and Security, 1972-1984 Austin Duckworth and Thomas M. Hunt * When Palestinian terrorists took eleven Israeli athletes hostage at the 1972 Munich Olympic Games, the image of the Olympics as an arena of global harmony shat- tered. The International Olympic Committee (IOC), which posited the view that the Games remained above political squabbles, faced a new, complex issue and had no clear precedent to draw upon. This article examines how IOC policy toward security at the Olympics changed following the initial attack at Munich to the years leading up to the 1984 Summer Olympic Games in Los Angeles. Drawing upon IOC Meeting Minutes, personal correspondence between IOC members, and media reports, this paper argues that previous interpretations of Olympic security over- state the role of President Juan Antonio Samaranch in altering IOC security policy following his election. This examination emphasizes the role of Indian IOC Mem- ber Ashwini Kumar as the driving force behind a shift in IOC policy towards secu- rity prior to the 1984 Games in Sarajevo and Los Angeles. ❖ Introduction Early on the morning of September 5, 1972, eight members of the Palestinian organization Black September stormed the Olympic Village compound hous- ing members of the Israeli Olympic team. The terrorists took eleven Israelis hostage and after hours of negotiations, a botched rescue attempt by German authorities to save the Israelis resulted in the deaths of all hostages and five of the terrorists. In the ensuing debate over whether to continue the Games, the President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), Avery Brundage, stood firm. -
Figures Are for Tickets Sold Worldwide As Reported to POLLSTAR for Shows Played Between 1/1/13 and 6/30/13 26 JULY 22, 2013 | *
1 1,129,914 The O2 - London London, UNITED KINGDOM 51 127,994 Valley View Casino Center San Diego, CA 2 698,766 Manchester Arena Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM 52 124,704 Consol Energy Center Pittsburgh, PA 3 657,423 Barclays Center Brooklyn, NY 53 121,768 CenturyLink Center Omaha Omaha, NE 4 491,848 Palais Omnisports de Paris-Bercy Paris, FRANCE 54 120,556 Grenslandhallen - Ethias Arena Hasselt, BELGIUM 5 470,034 Lanxess Arena Cologne, GERMANY 55 119,565 Intrust Bank Arena Wichita, KS 6 349,588 Sportpaleis Antwerpen Merksem, BELGIUM 56 119,357 Palacio De Los Deportes Mexico City, MEXICO 7 333,033 Wells Fargo Center Philadelphia, PA 57 117,537 Chesapeake Energy Arena Oklahoma City, OK 8 330,267 LG Arena Birmingham, UNITED KINGDOM 58 117,240 Thomas & Mack Center Las Vegas, NV 9 323,481 The O2 - Dublin Dublin, IRELAND 59 114,208 Allstate Arena Rosemont, IL 10 314,493 Hallenstadion Zurich Zurich, SWITZERLAND 60 112,630 Target Center Minneapolis, MN 11 308,699 Arena Ciudad De Mexico Mexico City, MEXICO 61 111,395 Time Warner Cable Arena Charlotte, NC 12 303,186 O2 World Hamburg Hamburg, GERMANY 62 108,529 The NIA Birmingham, UNITED KINGDOM 13 286,990 Philips Arena Atlanta, GA 63 102,899 United Center Chicago, IL 14 282,664 Ziggo Dome Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS 64 100,819 Cotai Arena At Venetian Macao Macau, CHINA 15 273,196 Air Canada Centre Toronto, CANADA 65 98,079 Lotto Arena Merksem, BELGIUM 16 270,258 Metro Radio Arena Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 66 96,967 Van Andel Arena Grand Rapids, MI 17 259,476 O2 World Berlin, GERMANY 67 96,525 TD Garden Boston, -
Olympic Family Guide Contents
Olympic Family Guide Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................... 6 2 Welcome Messages ..........................................................7 3 Olympic Family Hotels ..................................................... 9 3.1 Windsor Marapendi (OFH) ...................................... 9 3.2 Windsor Barra and Windsor Oceânico (OF2) ....... 9 3.3 Novotel (OF3) ........................................................... 10 3.4 Services available at the OFH/OF2 and OF3 ...... 10 4 Olympic Family Accreditation Centre ..........................15 4.1 Olympic Family Accreditation Centre Operations ...................................................15 4.2 Lost, Stolen or Damaged OIAC ...........................16 4.3 Olympic Family Hotel Guest and resident passes ........................................................16 4.4 Venue accreditation assistance ........................... 17 5 5 Arrivals and Departures Services ............................18 5.1 Arrivals at Tom Jobim International Airport (GIG) .............................................................19 5.2 Arrivals at other ports of entry ...........................19 5.3 Mishandled baggage (lost, delayed or damaged) ...................................20 5.4 Departures ...............................................................21 5.5 Transport From Windsor Marapendi (OFH) to Tom Jobim ............................................................21 6 Olympic Family Assistant (OFA) Programme and T1, T2 Transport Services -
Environmental Impact Statement
Environmental Impact Statement Stadium Australia Renewal 15 Edwin Flack Avenue, Sydney Olympic Park Submitted to Department of Planning, Infrastructure and Environment On behalf of Infrastructure NSW 16 September 2019 | 2190435 CONTACT Alexis Cella Director [email protected] (02) 9956 6962 Reproduction of this document or any part thereof is not permitted without prior written permission of Ethos Urban Pty Ltd. This document has been prepared by: This document has been reviewed by: Anna Nowland / Thomas Atkinson 13/09/19 Michael Oliver 13/09/19 Reproduction of this document or any part thereof is not permitted without written permission of Ethos Urban Pty Ltd. Ethos Urban operates under a Quality Management System. This report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with that system. If the report is not signed, it is a preliminary draft. Ethos Urban Pty Ltd ABN 13 615 087 931. www.ethosurban.com 173 Sussex Street, Sydney NSW 2000 t 61 2 9956 6952 Contents Statement of Validity 7 List of Abbreviations and Key Terms 8 Executive Summary 9 1.0 Introduction 14 1.1 Overview of the proposed development 14 1.2 Background to the development 14 1.3 Strategic need for the proposal 15 1.4 Objectives of the development 17 1.5 Analysis of alternatives 17 1.6 Secretary’s requirements 19 2.0 Site analysis 27 2.1 Site description and ownership 28 2.2 Surrounding development 40 3.0 Consultation 45 4.0 Description of the development 46 4.1 Numerical overview 46 4.2 Land use – ‘Recreation Facility (Major)’ and ancillary uses 47 4.3 Stadium design