DOCSLIB.ORG

SGS Forest Sustainability in Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SGS Forest Sustainability in Virginia Forest sustainability in the state of Virginia, USA Client: GDF Suez - Electrabel boulevard Simon Bolívar B-1000 Bruxelles Project No.: 130373 July 2014 SGS BELGIUM S.A. 1 αβχ Project No.: 130373 July 2014 GDF Suez- Electrabel Forest sustainability in Virginia CONTENTS 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................4 2. Virginia forests overview .................................................................................................................4 2.1. Location and distribution ..........................................................................................................4 2.1. Ecological zones ......................................................................................................................5 2.2. Forest species ..........................................................................................................................9 2.3. Forest ownership ................................................................................................................... 10 2.4. Competent authorities ........................................................................................................... 11 2.5. Overview of wood-related industry ........................................................................................ 13 3. Sustainability of Virginia forest ..................................................................................................... 16 3.1. Evolution of forest area an risk of conversion ....................................................................... 16 3.2. Living wood volumes and removals ...................................................................................... 20 3.3. Protection of ecosystems and biodiversity ............................................................................ 22 3.4. Protection of water ................................................................................................................ 26 3.5. Protection of soils .................................................................................................................. 29 3.6. Protection of carbon stocks ................................................................................................... 29 3.7. Protection of air quality .......................................................................................................... 31 3.8. Illegal logging ........................................................................................................................ 32 3.9. Civil rights and traditional rights ............................................................................................ 33 3.10. Forest certification ............................................................................................................. 33 4. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................. 34 FIGURES Figure 1: General maps of Virginia .........................................................................................................4 Figure 2 : Percent of county in forest land (Virginia, 2010) ....................................................................5 Figure 3: Ecoregions of Virginia (Levels III & IV) ....................................................................................8 Figure 4: Area distribution of forest land by forest-type group (2012) ....................................................9 Figure 5 : Distribution of major forest types of Virginia ........................................................................ 10 Figure 6 : Regional areas of the Forest Service .................................................................................. 12 Figure 7 : Virginia VDOF administrative regions ................................................................................. 13 Figure 8 : Roundwood production for all products by species group and year ................................... 14 Figure 9 : Roundwood production by type of product (Virginia, 2009) ................................................ 15 Figure 10 : Primary wood-using mills by region (Virignia, 2009) ......................................................... 15 Figure 11 : Change in forest land and timberland area over time – Virginia ....................................... 17 Figure 12 : Forest Inventory and Analysis Survey Units in Virginia .................................................... 17 Figure 13 : Forest land area (in million ha) change by FIA survey unit ............................................... 18 Figure 14 : Trend and projection of timberland area for Virginia ......................................................... 19 Figure 15 : Projection of forest types 2008-2058 in Virginia ............................................................... 20 Figure 16 : Evolution of net volume of live trees (at least 5 inch d.b.h./d.r.c.) in million m³ on timberland (Virginia, 1977-2012) .................................................................................................. 20 SGS BELGIUM S.A. 2 αβχ Project No.: 130373 July 2014 GDF Suez- Electrabel Forest sustainability in Virginia Figure 19 : Average net annual growth VS removals of live trees on timberland (at least 5 inch d.b.h./d.r.c.), in million m³ ............................................................................................................. 21 Figure 20 : Protected areas in Virginia ................................................................................................ 23 Figure 21 : State Parks in Virginia ....................................................................................................... 23 Figure 22 : National parks in Virginia ................................................................................................... 24 Figure 24 : Carbon stocks evolution in forestland – Virginia, 2001-2012 ............................................ 31 TABLES Table 1 : Area of forest land by forest-type group (2012).......................................................................9 Table 3 : Area of forest land and timberland by ownership groups ..................................................... 11 Table 4 : Evolution of forested area (2001-2012) and timberland (1977-2012) in Virginia ................. 16 Table 6 : Land under protection status in Virginia (as of 2011) ........................................................... 22 Table 7 : New land under conservation status per year in Virginia (1998-2005) ................................ 24 Table 8 : Statewide data for the 2012 BMP audit by BMP category ................................................... 28 Table 9 : Regional data for the 2012 BMP audit by BMP category ..................................................... 28 Table 10 : Carbon stocks evolution in forestland – (Virginia 2001-2012)............................................ 30 Table 11 : Certified forest land in Virginia (2011) ................................................................................ 33 SGS BELGIUM S.A. 3 αβχ Project No.: 130373 July 2014 GDF Suez- Electrabel Forest sustainability in Virginia 1. Introduction The combustion of wood for energy purpose is not considered to contribute to the augmentation of greenhouse gases concentration in the atmosphere, as long as the CO2 emissions released during the combustion of wood are balanced by the growth of new trees. It is therefore essential to investigate if the forests in the region where the wood used for energy purpose are managed in a sustainable way, avoiding resources associated with overexploitation of forests, land use change, depletion of carbon stocks, etc... In this framework, literature research was carried out to produce a summary of forest management in Virginia, including general condition, management and sustainability assessment. 2. Virginia forests overview 2.1. Location and distribution Virginia is located in the East of the USA and covers a total surface area of 110 785 km². The State of Virginia is divided into 95 counties and is bordered by Maryland on the north and on the east, by Atlantic Ocean on the east, by North Carolina and Tennessee on the south, by Kentucky on the west and by West Virginia on the north and on the west. Figure 1: General maps of Virginia Source: NETSTATE – North Carolina (http://www.netstate.com/states/geography/mapcom/va_mapscom.htm) SGS BELGIUM S.A. 4 αβχ Project No.: 130373 July 2014 GDF Suez- Electrabel Forest sustainability in Virginia The forests of Virginia are part of the large forest area of the South East USA. Nowadays, Virginia’s forest covers about 62% of the State’s land area with 6.43 million ha1. Nearly all of the forest land (96%) is considered available for timber production (timberland). As seen on the figure below and according to the inventory2 conducted in 2010 by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) – Forest Service, the majority of counties in Virginia are at least 50% forested. The least forested counties are located in the northern portion of the State and along the coast. Figure 2 : Percent of county in forest land (Virginia, 2010) Source: Forest Inventory & Analysis factsheet (Virginia 2010) - USDA – Forest Service 2.1. Ecological zones Virginia's lower elevations and lowest points (sea level) are in the east along the Chesapeake Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. The land rises to the west where the Blue Ridge Mountains run
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arlington Public Schools Social Studies Curriculum 2016 GRADE 1
    Arlington Public Schools Social Studies Curriculum 2016 GRADE 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Social Studies Office acknowledges the contributions made to the development of these materials by all social studies staff and especially the following people: Kindergarten: Our Community Mary Cantwell, Anna Maria Lechleitner, Juanita Wade Grade 1: Our State Marijoy Cordero, Gina Samara, Jaclyn Scott Grade 2: Our Country Jennifer Burgin, Anna Kanter, Maryellen Meden, Eric Sokolove Grade 3: Ancient World Cultures Kim Dinardo, Tara Mitchell, Christine Williams, Tricia Zipfel Grade 4: Virginia Studies Mercedes Dean, Lauren Elkins, Karen Magestad, Kristen Wolla Grade 5: Ancient World Greg Chapuis, Casey Dolan, Nicholas Fernandez, Michelle Jaeckel Grade 6: U.S. History, Civics and Economics to 1865 Patricia Carlson, Breonna McClain, Anne Miller, Tiffany Mitchell, Sara Winter Grade 7: U.S. History, Civics and Economics 1865 to Present Jesse Homburg, Rachel Payne, Lilo Stephens, Patty Tuttle-Newby Grade 8: World Geography Allie Bakaj, Christine Joy, Maureen Nolan, Sarah Stewart Grade 9: World History II from 1500 A.D. Jen Dean, Jeana Norton, Anne Stewart Grade 10: World History I to 1500 A.D. Julie Bell, Kathleen Claassen, Caitlin Dodds Grade 11: U.S. and Virginia History Kevin Bridwell, Greg Cabana, Erica Drummond, Kevin Phillips Grade 12: U.S. and Virginia Government Diane Boudalis, Michelle Cottrell-Williams, Patricia Hunt Diana Jordan Barbara Ann Lavelle Cathy Bonneville Hix Social Studies Supervisor Arlington Public Schools Social Studies Curriculum 2016 GRADE 1 COURSE DESCRIPTION: The course of study for first grade includes an introduction to the lives of American leaders and their contributions to the United States. Students should recognize basic map symbols and construct a simple map of a familiar area.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Hydrogeologic Framework of the Shallow Aquifer System at Virginia Beach, Virginia
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with City of Virginia Beach, Department of Public Utilities Conceptual Hydrogeologic Framework of the Shallow Aquifer System at Virginia Beach, Virginia Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4262 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Conceptual Hydrogeologic Framework of the Shallow Aquifer System at Virginia Beach, Virginia By Barry S. Smith and George E. Harlow, Jr. Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4262 Prepared in cooperation with City of Virginia Beach, Department of Public Utilities Richmond, Virginia 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of trade or product names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 1730 East Parham Road Box 25286, Federal Center Richmond, VA 23228 Denver, CO 80225-0286 [email protected] Information about water resources in Virginia is available on the World Wide Web at http://va.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Mean Long-Term Hydrologic Budget Components For
    urren : C t R gy e o s l e o r a r d c Sanford et al., Hydrol Current Res 2015, 6:1 y h H Hydrology DOI: 10.4172/2157-7587.1000191 Current Research ISSN: 2157-7587 Research Article Open Access Estimating Mean Long-term Hydrologic Budget Components for Watersheds and Counties: An Application to the Commonwealth of Virginia, USA Ward E Sanford1*, David L Nelms2, Jason P Pope2 and David L Selnick3 1Mail Stop 431, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, 20171, USA 2U.S. Geological Survey, Richmond, Virginia, USA 3U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, USA Abstract Mean long-term hydrologic budget components, such as recharge and base flow, are often difficult to estimate because they can vary substantially in space and time. Mean long-term fluxes were calculated in this study for precipitation, surface runoff, infiltration, total evapotranspiration (ET), riparian ET, recharge, base flow (or groundwater discharge) and net total outflow using long-term estimates of mean ET and precipitation and the assumption that the relative change in storage over that 30-year period is small compared to the total ET or precipitation. Fluxes of these components were first estimated on a number of real-time-gaged watersheds across Virginia. Specific conductance was used to distinguish and separate surface runoff from base flow. Specific-conductance (SC) data were collected every 15 minutes at 75 real-time gages for approximately 18 months between March 2007 and August 2008. Precipitation was estimated for 1971-2000 using PRISM climate data. Precipitation and temperature from the PRISM data were used to develop a regression-based relation to estimate total ET.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020
    Updated: December 2020 Copyright © 2016 by the Virginia Department of Education P. O. Box 2120 Richmond, Virginia 23218-2120 All rights reserved. Reproduction of these materials for instructional purposes in public school classrooms in Virginia is permitted. Superintendent of Public Instruction Steven R. Staples Chief Academic Officer/Assistant Superintendent for Instruction John W. “Billy” Haun Office of Humanities and Early Childhood Christine A. Harris, Director Christonya B. Brown, History and Social Science Coordinator Betsy S. Barton, History and Social Science Specialist NOTICE The Virginia Department of Education does not unlawfully discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, age, or disability in employment or in its educational programs or services. History and Social Science Standards of Learning Curriculum Framework 2015: Kindergarten 1 INTRODUCTION The History and Social Science Standards of Learning Curriculum Framework 2015, approved by the Board of Education on January 28, 2016, is a companion document to the 2015 History and Social Science Standards of Learning for Virginia Public Schools. The Curriculum Framework amplifies the Standards of Learning by defining the content understandings, knowledge, and skills that are measured by the Standards of Learning assessments. The standards and Curriculum Framework are not intended to encompass the entire curriculum for a given grade level or course, nor to prescribe how the content should be taught. School divisions are encouraged to incorporate the standards and Curriculum Framework into a broader, locally designed curriculum. The Curriculum Framework delineates in greater specificity the minimum content that all teachers should teach and all students should learn. Teachers are encouraged to go beyond the standards and select instructional strategies and assessment methods appropriate for their students.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources.Pdf
    National Centers for Environmental Information | State Climate Summaries Supplementary Material Resources 1. Abkowitz, M., J. Camp, R. Chen, V. Dale, J. Dunn, D. Kirschke, D. de La Torre ugarte, J. Fu, J. Gilligan, Q. He, D. Larsen, E. Parish, B. Preston, J. Schwartz, A. Vergara, B. Wesh, and T. Wilbanks, 2012: Sustaining Tennessee in the face of climate change: Grand challenges and great opportunities, 72 pp. [Available online at http://www.eenews.net/assets/2012/09/13/document_cw_01.pdf] 2. ADWR, cited 2016: Climate of the Eastern Plateau Planning Area, Arizona Department of Water Resources. [Available online at http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/StatewidePlanning/WaterAtlas/EasternPlateau/Plannin gAreaOverview/Climate.htm] 3. Allegheny Highlands Climate Change Impacts Initiative, 2015: “On the chopping block” The impacts of global warming and climate change on the Mid-Atlantic Allegheny Highlands: A report from the Allegheny Highlands Climate Change Impacts Initiative, 19pp. [Available online at 4. Amico, C., D. DeBelius, T. Henry, and M. Stiles, cited 2015: Dried out confronting the Texas drought, NPR, [Available online at http://stateimpact.npr.org/texas/drought/] 5. AON Benfield, 2011: United States April & May 2011 Severe Weather Outbreaks, Impact Forecasting, Severe Weather Outbreaks Event Recap Report. [Available online at http://www.aon.com/attachments/reinsurance/201106_us_april_may_severe_weather_out breaks_recap.pdf] 6. AON Benfield, 2013: Hurricane Sandy event recap report: Impact forecasting, 50 pp. [Available online at http://thoughtleadership.aonbenfield.com/Documents/20130514_if_hurricane_sandy_eve nt_recap.pdf] 7. Arizona Climate Extremes, cited 2016: [Available online at https://azclimate.asu.edu/docs/azclimate/ArizonaClimateExtremes.pdf] 8. Arkansas Groundwater Protection and Management Report, 2014: A Supplement to the Arkansas Water Plan, 92pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Affected Environment Summary
    Chapter 3 USFWS Great egret looking for lunch along Back Bay shoreline Affected Environment Summary Summary Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge is located in southeastern Virginia along the Atlantic Ocean and within the southern half of the city limits of Virginia Beach. The environment of this 9,035-acre Refuge consists mostly of water, barrier sand dunes, and wetland marsh. The immediate surrounding environment is residential, rural agriculture, barrier dunes, inland water, and ocean front. The area just north of the Refuge is urban. Back Bay NWR was established by Executive Order #7907 on June 6, 1938. Prior to acquisition by the Federal government, the barrier beach portion was generally flat and sandy. The saline soils were unproductive. Periodic storms from the northeast (northeasters) and hurricanes pushed large quantities of sea water across these flat beaches, and into Back Bay. During the early 1930’s the Civilian Conservation Corps built brush fences and planted cane and bulrush to catch moving sands; thus building and stabilizing new sand dune formations. Later, wooden sand fences were constructed, and many dunes were planted with Beachgrass (Ammophila breviligulata). These new dunes protected the bayside flats from oceanic waters and permitted formation of an oligohaline marsh, which is nearly free of salt particles. The original 1938 Executive Order established Back Bay NWR “….as a refuge and breeding ground for migratory birds and other wildlife.” Another of the Refuge’s primary purposes (for lands acquired under the Migratory Bird Conservation Act) is “… use as an inviolate sanctuary, or for any other management purpose, for migratory birds.” The Refuge is part of the eastern portion of the Atlantic Flyway.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Budget Delays in the Commonwealth of Virginia: a Cross State Analysis of Political and Economic Factors
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Assessing Budget Delays in the Commonwealth of Virginia: A Cross State Analysis of Political and Economic Factors Emily Newton Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/2588 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASSESSING BUDGET DELAYS IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA: A CROSS STATE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Virginia Commonwealth University. By: Emily Byrd Newton Bachelor of Arts, Randolph-Macon College, 2001 Master of Public Policy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2006 William C. Bosher, Jr. Ed.D Dissertation Chair Distinguished Professor of Public Policy and Education Executive Director, Commonwealth Educational Policy Institute Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia December, 2011 Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my parents, Byrd and Mary Sue Newton. You always encouraged me to further my education, and to be a proud employee of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Also, you always taught me to take advantage of the great education that this state offers (although that may have been a trick to get me to stay closer to home).
    [Show full text]
  • Environment, Disease and Mortality in Early Virginia
    Journal of Historical Geography, 5,4 (1979) 365-390 Environment, disease and mortality in early Virginia Camille Earle Early Virginia (1607-24) was a nightmarish world of disease and death, perhaps unsur- passed in the annals of English colonization. Typhoid fever and dysentery visited James- town in recurrent epidemics killing 30 per cent or more of the colonists with each onslaught. Yet Jamestown endured because the leaders of the Virginia Company misapprehended the nexus between the estuarine environment and water-borne, non- immunizing diseases. Each summer, death stalked the town as invading salt water pushed up the estuary and concentrated pathogens in the town’s water supply. The prevention of disease and death required the abandonment of Jamestown and reloca- tion into healthier niches, which occurred with the dissolution of the Virginia Company in 1624. The English colonization of North America resembled an epic geographical comedy. Captivated by the facile belief that latitude controlled climate and en- vironment, the English mind transfigured America into a pristine, temperate Europe.[ll Along the fresh face of the Atlantic Seaboard of North America, they envisaged familiar Old World environments-environments of moderation, of temperate maritime climate consisting of more humid lands to the north in what they would call, after their analogue, New England, and Mediterranean-like lands in the latitudes of Virginia and the Carolinas. Here was a premise for uproarious comedy and, at times, tragedy. Seldom has such a misguided theory produced so many bizarre consequences. In the latitude of Spain, the English colonists dutifully tended the vineyards that yielded insipid wine.
    [Show full text]
  • Entrepreneurship and the Transformation of Virginia, 1688-1750 (2018)
    MICHIE, IAN M., Ph.D. Agents of Empire: Entrepreneurship and the Transformation of Virginia, 1688-1750 (2018). Directed by Dr. Phyllis Whitman Hunter. 312 pages. This study examines the economic culture of Virginia from the end of the seventeenth century to the middle of the eighteenth. The study employs five individuals who operated in an entrepreneurial capacity as case studies to reveal the complexity of the business climate in Virginia. Using these individuals as examples I argue that an entrepreneurial mindset influenced the growth of transatlantic commerce in Virginia. At the same time entrepreneurial activity aided in the solidification of anglicized institutions in the colonies, allowing for deepening assertions of empire in the Chesapeake and backcountry regions. However, the transition was never an organized progression but, rather, a complicated web of endeavors relying on legitimate and illegitimate business networks and practices. The case studies represented in this work demonstrate the types of business activities undertaken by settlers and planters as they tested the exploitable resources and the imperial authority of the colony. It also focuses on a place and time where the growth of plantation slavery influenced motivations and actions of colonists. The work adds to previous histories of Virginia, Atlantic, and economic history by offering analysis of the social environment and cultural motivations of the period though the examination of business-motivated individuals. These individuals were integral parts of a larger culture of empire that asserted its power into North America in the eighteenth century. AGENTS OF EMPIRE: ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF VIRGINIA, 1688-1750 by Ian M.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Virginia
    Overview of Virginia 1. What body of water provided transportation between Virginia and Europe, Africa, and the Caribbean? a. The Atlantic Ocean 2. What body of water provided a safe harbor and was a source of food and transportation? a. Chesapeake Bay 3. Name the five states that border Virginia. (Ketchup with Mustard Tastes Nasty) a. Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland, Tennessee, North Carolina 4. What three regions are parts of the Appalachian Mountain System? a. Blue Ridge Mountains, Valley and Ridge, and Appalachian Plateau 5. What region is the source of many rivers? a. Blue Ridge Mountains 6. What four rivers flow into the Chesapeake Bay? a. Potomac River, Rappahannock River, York River, James River 7. The climate of Virginia is __________ with distinct seasons. a. Mild 8. _______________ covers most of the land of Virginia. a. Forests 9. What words can be used to describe “relative location?” a. Next to, Bordering, Near 10. What two large bodies of water border Virginia? a. Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean Coastal Plain (Tidewater) Region 1. What major landform covers the Coastal Plain Region? 2. Name four major rivers of the Coastal Plain Region and its riverside city. a. Potomac River – Alexandria b. Rappahannock River – Fredericksburg c. York River – York Town d. James River – Jamestown and Richmond 3. What bay borders the Coastal Plain Region? a. Chesapeake Bay 4. What ocean borders the Coastal Plain Region? a. Atlantic Ocean 5. Describe the land of the Coastal Plain Region. a. Low, flat land 6. What is the major products of the Coastal Plain Region? a.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8: Climate of the Southeastern US
    Chapter 8: Climate of the Southeastern US atmosphere • a layer of Climate is a description of the average temperature, range of temperatures, gases surrounding a planet. humidity, precipitation, and other atmospheric/hydrospheric conditions a region experiences over a period of many years. These factors interact with and are influenced by other parts of the Earth system, including geology, geography, insolation, currents, and living things. system • a set of connected things or parts forming a complex whole. Because it is founded on statistics, climate can be a difficult concept to grasp, yet concrete examples can be illuminating. Terms like "desert," "rain forest," and "tundra" describe climates, and we have gained a general understanding of their meaning. Climate can also encompass the cyclical variations a region weather • the measure experiences; a region with a small temperature variation between winter and of short-term conditions of summer—San Francisco, for example—has a different climate from one that the atmosphere such as temperature, wind speed, and has a large variation, such as Buffalo. Scientists have settled on 30 years as humidity. the shortest amount of time over which climate can be defined, but it can of course also define time periods millions of years in length. You cannot go outside and observe climate. Weather, on the other hand, can be geologic time scale • a observed instantly—it is 57 degrees and raining right now. Weather varies with standard timeline used to the time of day, the season, multi-year cycles, etc., while climate encompasses describe the age of rocks and fossils, and the events that those variations.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Climate Change and the Westhampton Lake: Review And
    5. Climate Change and the Westhampton Lake: Review and Recommendations By: Kendel Ahnell, Yazmeen Nuñez, Natasha Rathlev Abstract The Westhampton Lake is a campus icon and one of the University of Richmond's most prominent features. The significant attachment that members of the University community hold toward the lake imbues great value on the lake as a key geographic element of campus (Devine- Wright, 2013). However, the lake’s status as a campus monument does not absolve it from the greater effects of climate change, a phenomenon which will continue to transform the geography and ecology of the lake. Without a concrete understanding of the implications of current and future climate change on campus, the community may leave the Westhampton Lake susceptible to environmentally unsustainable practices which threaten the lake and, thereby, the face of campus. Over the course of the semester, student researchers collected and analyzed existing information about Westhampton Lake so as to educate the greater community on the lake’s health. This research team also offers recommendations so as to sustain the lake in the face of climate change on a local scale. Introduction This research recognizes the significance of Westhampton Lake not only as an ecological area existing in connectivity with the James River and the Chesapeake Bay Watersheds, but also as a distinct and central geographical feature of the University of Richmond campus. If the University is committed to sustainability and to cultivating the campus’s natural beauty, then it is in the University’s best interest to preserve the health of Westhampton Lake in environmentally sustainable ways.
    [Show full text]