DOCSLIB.ORG

Forests, Trees and Agroforestry: Livelihoods, Landscapes and Governance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forests, Trees and Agroforestry: Livelihoods, Landscapes and Governance CGIAR Research Program 6 Forests, Trees and Agroforestry: Livelihoods, Landscapes and Governance Proposal February 2011 CGIAR Research Program 6 Forests, Trees and Agroforestry: Livelihoods, Landscapes and Governance Proposal February 2011 Table of Contents Abbreviations vi Acknowledgements xvi Executive Summary xvii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Setting the scene 1 1.2 Conceptual framework 7 1.3 The challenges 10 1.4 Vision of success 15 1.5 Strategy for impact 17 1.6 Innovation 20 1.7 Comparative advantage of CGIAR centers in leading this effort 22 1.8 Proposal road map 23 2. Research Portfolio 25 2.1 Component 1: Smallholder production systems and markets 28 2.2 Component 2: Management and conservation of forest and tree resources 60 2.3 Component 3: Landscape management for environmental services, biodiversity conservation and livelihoods 91 2.4 Component 4: Climate change adaptation and mitigation 120 2.5 Component 5: Impacts of trade and investment on forests and people 160 3. Cross-cutting Themes 189 3.1 Gender 189 3.2 Partnerships 200 3.3 Capacity strengthening 208 4. Program Support 215 4.1 Communications and knowledge sharing in CRP6 215 4.2 Monitoring and evaluation for impact 224 4.3 Program management 230 5. Budget 241 5.1 Overview 241 5.2 Assumptions and basis of projections 243 5.3 Composition 247 5.4 Resource allocation 248 Annexes 251 Annex 1. Descriptions of CGIAR centers 251 Annex 2. Consultation process 253 Annex 3. Linkages with other CRPs 255 Annex 4. Sentinel landscapes 262 Annex 5. Assumptions and evidence used to develop 10-year impact projections 274 Annex 6 Statements of Support 279 Annex 7. Inception milestones 291 Annex 8. Budget detail 292 List of figures, tables and boxes Figures 2.1 CRP6 components along the forest and land use transition curve 25 2.2 Impact pathways for Component 1 54 2.3 Impact pathways for Component 2 85 2.4 Driver–state–response framework 95 2.5 Impact pathways for Component 3 114 2.6. Ecosystem-based mitigation opportunities in terms of Carbon Biomass density and deforestation 124 2.7 Adaptation needs: The climate poverty density index 124 2.8 Articulation of the three foci in Component 4 126 2.9 The areas most affected by drought and flood, in terms of mortality or economic losses 127 2.10 Impact pathways for Component 4 145 2.11 Links between Component 4 and the other components of CRP6 155 2.12 Links between Component 4 and CRP7 157 2.13 International trade in tropical wood (2008) 162 2.14 Impact pathways for Component 5 183 3.1 Illustrative impact pathways for addressing gender issues through research and action 199 4.1 Knowledge sharing for impact 216 4.2 Organizational chart for CRP6 232 5.1 CRP6 budget allocation by center 242 5.2 Regional distribution of the budget 243 5.3 CRP6 budget 2011, 2012 and 2013 245 5.4 Comparison between “business as usual” and “what-it-takes” CRP6 budgets 247 A2.1 Number of words of feedback and number of respondents per component 253 Tables 2.1 Illustrative list of policy and knowledge-sharing partners for Component 1 58 2.2 Illustrative list of policy and knowledge-sharing partners for Component 2 89 2.3 Illustrative list of policy and knowledge-sharing partners for Component 3 118 2.4 Illustrative list of policy and knowledge-sharing partners for Component 4 152 2.5 Links between Component 4 and CRP7 158 2.6 List of selected countries by region 169 2.7 Illustrative list of policy and knowledge-sharing partners for Component 5 186 3.1 Consideration of gender differentials and equality across the research components 192 3.2 Synergies between CRP6 components and themes and FORDA’s RPI 203 3.3 Illustrative list of potential partners for CRP6 205 3.4 CRP6 capacity-strengthening outputs, outcomes and impacts 212 4.1 Summary of risks facing CRP6 229 5.1 Main budget components for the first three years of CRP6 (2011-2013) 241 5.2 “What it takes” budgets for 2012 and 2013 246 A8.1 Consolidated CRP6 Budget for years 2011–2013 by Component 292 A8.2 Consolidated CRP6 Budget for years 2011-2013 by Center 293 iv A8.3 Consolidated CRP6 Component 1 budget for years 2011-2013 294 A8.4 Consolidated CRP6 Component 2 budget for years 2011-2013 295 A8.5 Consolidated CRP6 Component 3 budget for years 2011-2013 296 A8.6 Consolidated CRP6 Component 4 budget for years 2011-2013 297 A8.7 Consolidated CRP6 Component 5 budget for years 2011-2013 298 A8.8 Consolidated CRP6 budgets by Center for 2011 299 A8.9 CRP6 budgets by Natural Classification for years 2011-2013 300 A8.10 Bioversity CRP6 budget for years 2011-2013 301 A8.11 CIAT CRP6 budget for years 2011-2013 302 A8.12 CIFOR CRP6 budget for years 2011-2013 303 A8.13 World Agroforestry CRP6 budget for years 2011-2013 304 A8.14 Program Co-ordination and Communications budget for CRP6 years 2011-2013 305 A8.15 Sentinel Landscapes budget for CRP6 years 2011-2013 306 A8.16 “What it takes” CRP6 budgets for years 2012-2013 307 A8.17 CRP6 Scientific projections for “what it takes” by Center, years 2012-2013 308 Boxes 2.1 Example of potential impact: The Novella Africa Initiative to upscale smallholder production and incomes from Allanblackia 52 2.2 Developing a global strategy for the conservation and use of cocoa genetic resources 71 2.3 The benefits of better managed production forests 84 2.4 Payments and rewards for environmental services 103 2.5 CIFOR and World Agroforestry Centre landscape research methodologies 104 2.6 Examples of potential impacts of Component 3 115 2.7 Tenure in Component 4 121 2.8 Broad hypotheses underpinning Component 4 research 125 2.9 Example of methods: Emissions associated with peatland conversion in Jambi, Indonesia 130 2.10 The role of biofuels in adaptation and mitigation 140 2.11 Climate change mitigation: A quantified impact example 146 2.12 Contribution of adaptation funding to local livelihoods 147 2.13 Example of partnerships (and the role of partners in impact pathways): The CCB standards 153 2.14 Financial sector reform to reduce forest crime 165 2.15 Advocacy influences on pulp and paper industry practices 182 2.16 Illustrative expected outcomes related to illegal logging and timber markets 184 3.1 Gender-responsive participatory research 194 3.2 Anatomy of a gender-based research and action partnership in Uganda 195 3.3 Impact pathways: An illustration from Uganda 197 3.4 Types of partners 201 3.5 Forestry research capacity building in the DRC 209 3.6 Filling capacity gaps in the management of forest genetic resources 210 3.7 Mainstreaming agroforestry into agriculture and natural resources training 211 4.1 A modern research conference: A marriage of the old and the new 218 A2.1 Current long-term landscape-scale sites or networks where CRP6 centers are already working, and which could be candidate sites for a future CRP6 Sentinel Landscape network 268 A2.2 Questions to be addressed at the proposed CRP sentinel landscapes network conceptual and design workshop 273 v Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank AERC African Economic Research Consortium AF Kyoto Protocol Adaptation Fund AFAWI Alliance for African Women Initiative AfDB African Development Bank AFF African Forest Forum AFOLU Agriculture, forestry and land use AFORNET African Forest Research Network AFP Asia Forest Partnership AFTP Agroforestry tree product AfSIS African Soil Information Service AGRA Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa AGTER Améliorer la gouvernance de la terre, de l’eau et des ressources naturelles AIT Asian Institute of Technology ANAFE African Network for Agriculture, Agroforestry and Natural Resources Education ANAFOR National Forestry Development Agency (Cameroon) APAFRI Asia Pacific Association of Forestry Research Institutions APFORGEN Asia Pacific Forest Genetic Resources Programme ARI Advanced research institute ASARECA Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa AU African Union AU-NEPAD African Union, New Partnership for Africa’s Development BACI Before–after, control–impact BAU Business as usual BFW Austrian Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape BIC Bank Information Center BNDES Brazilian Development Bank BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences BRIC Brazil, Russia, India, China C Carbon vi CAAS Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences CAF Chinese Academy of Forestry CAMCORE Central American and Mexico Coniferous Resources Cooperative CAN Andean Community of Nations CANGIS CacaoNet Germplasm Information System CARPE Central African Regional Program for the Environment CATIE Tropical Agriculture Research and Higher Education Center CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CBFE Community-based forest enterprise CBFP Congo Basin Forest Partnership CBO Community-based organization CCBA Climate, Community and Carbon Alliance CCI Cocoa Coconut Institute (PNG) CDM Clean Development Mechanism CEB Council of Europe Development Bank CEDLA Center for Latin American Research and Documentation CEEAC Economic Community of Central African States CEESP IUCN Commission on Environmental, Economic and Social Policy CENAREST National Center for Scientific and Technologic Research (Gabon) CEPLAC Comissão Executiva de Planejamento da Lavoura Cacaueira (Brazil) CGIAR Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research CI Conservation International CIAT International Center for Tropical Agriculture CICY Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán CIFOR Center for International Forestry Research CILSS Comité Permanent Inter-etats pour la Lutte Contre la Sécheresse au Sahel (Permanent Inter-State Committee for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annex B Report of the XI World Forestry Congress Technical
    307 ■ Annex B Report of the XI World Forestry Congress Technical Session No. 27 Better Addressing Conflicts in Natural Resource Use through the Promotion of Participatory Management from Community to Policy Levels Topic 27 20 October Aspendos Auditorium Chairman: Untung Iskandar Moderators: Abdoulaye Kane and Marilyn Hoskins Technical Secretaries: Sedat Ayanoglu and Katherine Warner Special Paper: Claude Desloges and Michelle Gauthier Panel: Silvano Aureoles Conejo, Berken Feddersen, Abdoulaye Kane and Diane Rocheleau Outcome of the Session General The session focused on various dimensions of forest resource conflicts in the context of community forestry, and the strategies and tools devel- oped to address such conflicts. There is growing evidence that if forestry is to play a key role in sustainable development, forest-dependent communities must be fully involved in both the decision-making process and actions concerning the land and resources they inhabit and use. Sustainable forest development will not be achieved if it fails to (1) consider the needs and aspirations of rural and forest- dwelling communities and (2) acknowledge and address, in an appropriate and Community Forestry Unit ■ Integrating Conflict Management Considerations into National Policy Frameworks ■ 308 timely way, the conflict situations created by competition for the use of forest resources. Participatory forest resource management is crucial in this context as it creates an environment in which all actors can harmonize diverging views and may collaboratively plan and act together. Participatory management embraces how forest and tree resources should be used for the benefits of all partners, including the environment and future generations. Case studies presented at the session emphasized the need to clearly identify power relationships between forest-dependent communities and other actors such as government institutions, private enterprises and NGOs.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroforestry : Fact-Sheet
    Agroforestry fact sheet Agroforestry is the mixture of trees and crops in cultivated parcels. It was a traditional system in both tropical and temperate countries before agriculture intensification during the last century. Very recent results show that it may be a key option for the future of modern agriculture, including in temperate countries. 10 years ago, agroforestry was still ignored by farmers, foresters, policy makers of developed coun- tries. But times have changed. Agroforestry is an utmost example of ecological intensification : it in- creases land productivity and offers at the same time many environmental services. A French national scheme for planting half a million hectares of agroforestry during the next 25 years was based on res- ults obtained by INRA, Montpellier. A walnut – wheat agroforestry plot at the Restinclières farm, tree pruning time (left) Monitoring water sap flow through tap roots and superficial roots to document the hydraulic lift on walnut agroforestry trees (right) Increase of productivity with agroforestry The mix of trees and crops is the fundamental principle of agroforestry. INRA researchers showed that the production from one hectare of a walnut/wheat mix is the same as for 1.4 hectares with trees and crops separated. This is a 40% increase in productivity, far better than any other innovation intro- duced by agronomists in the recent past. This is achieved with an optimal 50 to 100 trees/hectare dens- ity, and an appropriate management of the system (tree line orientation, tree pruning regime, winter crops). Agroforestry trees grow very fast, faster than trees in forest plantations. Rightly associated and appropriately managed, trees and annual crops establish a synergy in the use of the vital resources of light, water and soil nutrients.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth World Forestry Congress
    Proceedings of the Fifth World Forestry Congress VOLUME 1 RE University of Washington, Seattle, Washington United States of America August 29September 10, 1960 The President of the United States of America DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Patron Fifth World Forestry Congress III Contents VOLUME 1 Page Chapter1.Summary and Recommendations of the Congress 1 Chapter 2.Planning for the Congress 8 Chapter3.Local Arrangements for the Congress 11 Chapter 4.The Congress and its Program 15 Chapter 5.Opening Ceremonies 19 Chapter6. Plenary Sessions 27 Chapter 7.Special Congress Events 35 Chapitre 1.Sommaire et recommandations du Congrès 40 Chapitre 2.Preparation des plans en vue du Congrès 48 Chapitre 3.Arrangements locaux en vue du Congrès 50 Chapitre 4.Le Congrès et son programme 51 Chapitre 5.Cérémonies d'ouverture 52 Chapitre 6.Seances plénières 59 Chapitre 7.Activités spéciales du Congrès 67 CapItullo1. Sumario y Recomendaciones del Congreso 70 CapItulo 2.Planes para el Congreso 78 CapItulo 3.Actividades Locales del Congreso 80 CapItulo 4.El Congreso y su Programa 81 CapItulo 5.Ceremonia de Apertura 81 CapItulo 6.Sesiones Plenarias 88 CapItulo 7.Actos Especiales del Congreso 96 Chapter8. Congress Tours 99 Chapter9.Appendices 118 Appendix A.Committee Memberships 118 Appendix B.Rules of Procedure 124 Appendix C.Congress Secretariat 127 Appendix D.Machinery Exhibitors Directory 128 Appendix E.List of Financial Contributors 130 Appendix F.List of Participants 131 First General Session 141 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Second General Session 171 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Iv Contents Page Third General Session 189 Progress in World Forestry Progrés accomplis dans le monde en sylviculture Adelantos en la Silvicultura Mundial Section I.Silviculture and Management 241 Sessions A and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Handout for Introduction to Forest Gardening
    COURSE HANDOUT FOR INTRODUCTION TO FOREST GARDENING Complied by Jess Clynewood and Rich Wright Held at Coed Hills Rural Art Space 2010 ETHICS AND PRINCIPLES OF PERMACULTURE Care for the Earth v Care for the people v Fair shares PRINCIPLES Make the least change for the greatest effect v Mistakes are tools for learning v The only limits to the yield of a system are imagination and understanding Observation – Protracted and thoughtful observation rather than prolonged and thoughtless action. Observation is a key tool to re-learn. We need to know what is going on already so that we don’t make changes we will later regret. Use and value diversity - Diversity allows us to build a strong web of beneficial connections. Monocultures are incredibly fragile and prone to pests and diseases – diverse systems are far more robust and are intrinsically more resilient. Relative Location and Beneficial Connections – View design components not in isolation but as part of a holistic system. Place elements to maximise their potential to create beneficial connections with other elements. Multi-functional Design – Try and gain as many yields or outputs from each element in your design as possible. Meet every need in multiple ways, as many elements supporting each important function creates stability and resilience. Perennial systems – minimum effort for maximum gain Create no waste - The concept of waste is essentially a reflection of poor design. Every output from one system could become the input to another system. We need to think cyclically rather than in linear systems. Unmet needs = work, unused output = pollution. Stacking – Make use of vertical as well as horizontal space, filling as many niches as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investment Primer for Reforestation CARBON REMOVAL, ENVIRONMENTAL and SOCIAL IMPACTS, and FINANCIAL POTENTIAL
    1 An Investment Primer for Reforestation CARBON REMOVAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS, AND FINANCIAL POTENTIAL JANUARY 2020 1 CONTENTS Contents About CREO 2 Terms 3 Executive Summary 4 Background Forestry for Climate 6 Reforestation Investment Potential 9 - Investment Avenues 9 - Costs and Returns 10 Carbon Markets Regulatory Compliance 14 Voluntary 15 Corporate Offsetting 15 Summary 16 Timber and Non-Timber Forest Products Timber 18 Agroforestry 19 Summary 20 Restoration and Conservation Initiatives Direct Revenue Creation 22 Blended Finance 23 Catalytic Capital 24 Summary 24 Moving Forward 25 Appendix A: CREO Modelling Assumptions 26 Appendix B: Carbon Markets 27 Citations 28 2 ABOUT CREO About CREO The CREO Syndicate (“CREO”) is a 501c3 public charity founded by wealth owners and family offices with a mission to address the most pressing environmental challenges of our time affecting communities across the globe—climate change and resource scarcity. By catalyzing private capital and scaling innovative solutions, CREO is contributing to protecting and preserving the environment and accelerating the transition to a sustainable economy for the benefit of the public. CREO works closely with a broad set of global stakeholders, including Members (wealth owners, family offices, and family-owned enterprises), Friends (aligned investors such as pension funds), and Partners (government, not-for-profit organizations and academia), who collaboratively develop and invest in solutions across sectors, asset classes and geographies. CREO’s primary activities include 1) knowledge building; 2) relationship building among like-minded, values-aligned, long-term investors; 3) conducting select research to support the advancement of its mission; and 4) deal origination. 3 TERMS Terms Afforestation (AF): Planting and/or deliberate seeding on land not forested over the last 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroforestry Systems and Their Contribution to Supplying Forest Products to Communities in the Chure Range, Central Nepal
    Article Agroforestry Systems and Their Contribution to Supplying Forest Products to Communities in the Chure Range, Central Nepal Deepa Khadka 1,*, Anisha Aryal 2 , Kishor Prasad Bhatta 1 , Bed Prakash Dhakal 1 and Himlal Baral 3,4 1 Faculty of Forest Science and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-Universität, Busgenweg 5, 37077 Goettingen, Germany; [email protected] (K.P.B.); [email protected] (B.P.D.) 2 Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Technische Universität Dresden, 01737 Dresden, Germany; [email protected] 3 Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Jalan CIFOR, Situ Gede, Bogor 16115, Indonesia; [email protected] 4 School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Agroforestry (AF), an integration of agricultural and/or pastureland and trees, is a powerful tool for the maximization of profit from a small unit of land; however, it has been less well explored and recognized by existing policies. AF could be the best approach to conserving the fragile soils of Chure and to supplying subsistence needs to the local people. This study endeavored to understand how the adoption of various AF practices contributed to people’s livelihoods in the Bakaiya rural municipality of Makawanpur District. To achieve this, 5 focus group discussions, 10 key informant interviews and 100 household surveys were conducted. These were analyzed using various statistical Citation: Khadka, D.; Aryal, A.; analysis tools: Kruskal–Wallis test, Games–Howell post hoc comparison test and Wilcoxon test. Bhatta, K.P.; Dhakal, B.P.; Baral, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Biochar Effects on Soil Physiochemical Properties in Degraded Managed Ecosystems in Northeastern Bangladesh
    Article Biochar Effects on Soil Physiochemical Properties in Degraded Managed Ecosystems in Northeastern Bangladesh Md. Rezaul Karim 1 , Md Abdul Halim 1,2,* , Nigel V. Gale 2 and Sean C. Thomas 2 1 Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh; [email protected] 2 Institute of Forestry and Conservation, John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design, University of Toronto, 33 Willcocks Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3B3, Canada; [email protected] (N.V.G.); [email protected] (S.C.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 18 October 2020; Accepted: 24 November 2020; Published: 27 November 2020 Abstract: A body of emerging research shows the promise of charcoal soil amendments (“biochars”) in restoring fertility in degraded agricultural and forest soils. “Sustainable biochars” derived from locally produced waste biomass and produced near the application site are of particular interest. We tested the effects of surface applications of wood-derived biochars (applied at 7.5 t ha 1) on soil · − physiochemical properties (N, P, K, pH, soil moisture content, organic matter content, and bulk density) in three land-use types: agriculture (Camellia sinensis monoculture), agroforestry (C. sinensis with shade trees), and secondary forest (Dipterocarpus dominated) assessed over seven months. We found significant positive effects of biochar on soil physiochemical properties in all land-use types, with the strongest responses in the most degraded tea monoculture sites. Although biochar had no significant effect on soil N and K, it improved soil P—the primary nutrient most commonly limiting in tropical soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of MDF & Particleboard Industry in Protection of Natural Forests and Promotion of Agroforestry in Pakistan
    Role of MDF & Particleboard Industry in Protection of Natural Forests and Promotion of Agroforestry in Pakistan TABLE OF CONTENTS 5. Findings 16 5.1 Area Covered in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab and Sindh 16 5.2 Contribution of Billion Tree Afforestation Project (BTAP) in Agro-forestry of 16 the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 5.3 Total number of trees in farmlands of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab and 19 Sindh 5.4 Available Trees Stock per hectare on farmlands in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 19 Punjab and Sindh 5.5 Available Growing Stock on farmlands by Volume and Weight 20 5.6 Species-wise yield per hectare on farmlands 20 5.7 Projected Growing Stock available in Future in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab, 20 and Sindh 5.8 Species-wise Composition in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab and Sindh 21 5.9 Overall Carbon Fraction for the Available Stock 24 5.10 Agroforestry wood consumption pattern in Pakistan 24 5.11 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Agro-Forestry (Eucalyptus plantation) with other 25 Cash Crops 5.12 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Agro-Forestry (Acacia nilotica, Kikar) in Hurry 26 Plantation with other Cash Crops 6. Farmers Perception about Agro-forestry / Farm-forestry 28 6.1 Aims/objectives of agro-forestry plantations 28 6.2 Constraints faced by farmers in agro-forestry / farm forestry 28 6.3 The willingness of farmers to grow trees on farmlands in future 29 7. Role of MDF and Particleboard Industries in Protection of Natural Forests 29 8. Conclusion 30 9. Recommendations 31 9.1 Policymakers 31 9.2 Wood-based industries 31 9.3 Farmers 31 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Information for Forestry Planning in Québec, Canada
    Ecological Information for Forestry Planning in Québec, Canada Research Note Tabled at the XII World Forestry Congress – Québec, Canada 2003, by the Ministère des Ressources naturelles, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec September 2003 Direction de la recherche forestière (Forest Research Branch) Ecological Information for Forestry Planning in Québec, Canada by Pierre Grondin1, Jean-Pierre Saucier2, Jacques Blouin3, Jocelyn Gosselin3 and André Robitaille4 Research Note Tabled at the XII World Forestry Congress – Québec, Canada 2003, by the Ministère des Ressources naturelles, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec Ministère des Ressources naturelles, Ministère des Ressources naturelles, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec (MRNFP) de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec (MRNFP) Direction de la recherche forestière (Forest Direction des inventaires forestiers (Forest Surveys Research Branch) Branch) 2700, rue Einstein 880, chemin Sainte-Foy Sainte-Foy (Québec) G1P 3W8 Québec (Québec) G1S 4X4 CANADA CANADA Telephone: (418) 643-7994 Telephone: (418) 627-8669 Fax: (418) 643-2165 Fax: (418) 646-1995 ou (418) 644-9672 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.forestrycongress.gouv.qc.ca [email protected] www.mrnfp.gouv.qc.ca andré[email protected] 1 Forest Engineer, M.Sc. 2 Forest Engineer, D.Sc. 3 Forest Engineer 4 Geomorphologist, M.Sc. MRNFP Research Note Abstract Québec is on the verge of becoming a dominant figure in the use of ecological information for forestry planning. Ecological information expresses ecological diversity. This diversity is presented in various ways, especially by the use of diagrams showing the forest dynamic that occurs among the various forest types observed, through a homogeneous combination of the soil and drainage (ecological type).
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Based Conservation and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Implications for Social-Ecological Resilience
    Copyright © 2013 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Ruiz-Mallén, I. and E. Corbera. 2013. Community-based conservation and traditional ecological knowledge: implications for social-ecological resilience. Ecology and Society 18(4):12. http://dx.doi. org/10.5751/ES-05867-180412 Research, part of a Special Feature on Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Global Environmental Change: North and South Perspectives Community-Based Conservation and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Implications for Social-Ecological Resilience Isabel Ruiz-Mallén 1 and Esteve Corbera 1,2 ABSTRACT. Our review highlights how traditional ecological knowledge influences people's adaptive capacity to social- ecological change and identifies a set of mechanisms that contribute to such capacity in the context of community-based biodiversity conservation initiatives. Twenty-three publications, including twenty-nine case studies, were reviewed with the aim of investigating how local knowledge, community-based conservation, and resilience interrelate in social-ecological systems. We highlight that such relationships have not been systematically addressed in regions where a great number of community conservation initiatives are found; and we identify a set of factors that foster people's adaptive capacity to social-ecological change and a number of social processes that, in contrast, undermine such capacity and the overall resilience of the social- ecological system. We suggest that there is a need to further investigate how climate variability and other events affect the joint evolution of conservation outcomes and traditional ecological knowledge, and there is a need to expand the current focus on social factors to explain changes in traditional ecological knowledge and adaptive capacity towards a broader approach that pays attention to ecosystem dynamics and environmental change.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Canopy Change in Coastal Los Angeles, 2009 - 2014
    Cities and the Environment (CATE) Volume 10 Issue 2 Climate Change Adaptation in Article 3 Mediterranean Cities 2017 Tree Canopy Change in Coastal Los Angeles, 2009 - 2014 Dexter H. Locke National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC), [email protected] Michele Romolini Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Michael Galvin SavATree, [email protected] Jarlath P.M. O'Neil-Dunne University of Vermont, [email protected] Eric G. Strauss Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate Recommended Citation Locke, Dexter H.; Romolini, Michele; Galvin, Michael; O'Neil-Dunne, Jarlath P.M.; and Strauss, Eric G. (2017) "Tree Canopy Change in Coastal Los Angeles, 2009 - 2014," Cities and the Environment (CATE): Vol. 10: Iss. 2, Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol10/iss2/3 This Special Topic Article: Climate Change in Mediterranean Cities is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Urban Resilience at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cities and the Environment (CATE) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tree Canopy Change in Coastal Los Angeles, 2009 - 2014 Los Angeles, California is prone to extreme climate events—e.g. drought, wildfires, and floods—that are only expected to increase with climate change. The establishment of green infrastructure, including a stable urban forest, is a strategy to improve resilience not only to these events, but also to contribute to other environmental, social, and economic goals.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Ecotourism Planning
    Ecotourism Development A Manual for Conservation Planners and Managers VolumeVolume ll An Introduction to Ecotourism Planning Andy Drumm and Alan Moore ALEX C. WALKER EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE FOUNDATION Ecotourism Development – A Manual for Conservation Planners and Managers Volume 1 Copyright © 2002 by The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA. All rights reserved. Editing: Alex Singer Design/Layout: Jonathan Kerr Cover Photography: Ecotourists at Yaxchilan Mayan site, Chiapas, Mexico © Andy Drumm; Jaragua National Park, Dominican Republic © Andy Drumm; owl-eye monkeys, Panama © Marie Read Production: Publications for Capacity Building, The Nature Conservancy, Worldwide Office, 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203, USA. Fax: 703-841-4880; email: [email protected]. This publication was made possible, in part, through support provided by the Office LAC/RSD/, Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean, U.S. Agency for International Development, under terms of Grant No. LAG-0782-A- 00-5026-00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development. This publication was also made possible, in part, thanks to the vision, trust, and support of the Alex C. Walker Charitable and Educational Trust. For further information on Ecotourism projects or to provide feedback, please contact: Andy Drumm Director, Ecotourism The Nature Conservancy Worldwide Office 4245 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 USA Phone: 703-841-8177 Fax: 703-841-4880 Email: [email protected] printed on recycled paper Preface to the Ecotourism Development Manual cotourism has become an important economic tion to natural areas which, in many cases, is under- Eactivity in natural areas around the world.
    [Show full text]