Inoculating Legumes: a Practical Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inoculating Legumes: a Practical Guide INOCULATING LEGUMES: A PRACTICAL GUIDE REPRINTED MARCH 2019 Elizabeth Drew, David Herridge, Ross Ballard, Graham O’Hara, Rosalind Deaker, Matthew Denton, Ron Yates, Greg Gemell, Elizabeth Hartley, Lori Phillips, Nikki Seymour, John Howieson and Neil Ballard Title: Inoculating Legumes: A Practical Guide GRDC Project Code: UMU00032 Authors: Graham O’Hara, John Howieson (Murdoch University) Elizabeth Drew, Ross Ballard (South Australian Research and Development Institute), David Herridge (University of New England), Greg Gemmell, Elizabeth Hartley (NSW Department of Primary Industries), Lori Phillips (Victorian Department of Primary Industries), Rosalind Deaker (University of Sydney), Matt Denton (University of Adelaide), Ron Yates (Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia), Nikki Seymour (Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry) and Neil Ballard (Global Pasture Consultants). In submitting this report, the researchers have agreed to the GRDC publishing this material in its edited form. ISBN 978-1-921779-45-9 Published December 2012 Revised June 2014 and reprinted March 2019 © Grains Research and Development Corporation All Rights Reserved 2 GRDC Contract details: Ms Maureen Cribb Publishing Manager GRDC PO Box 5367 KINGSTON ACT 2604 PH: 02 6166 4500 INOCULATING LEGUMES: A PRACTICAL GUIDE INOCULATING Email: [email protected] Web: www.grdc.com.au Copies of this report are available from Ground Cover Direct Free phone: 1800 11 00 44, Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: www.grdc.com.au/bookshop This publication has been prepared in good faith by the contributors on the basis of information available at the date of publication without any independent verification. The Grains Research and Development Corporation does not guarantee or warrant the accuracy, reliability, completeness of currency of the information in this publication nor its usefulness in Design and production: achieving any purpose. Coretext, www.coretext.com.au Readers are responsible for assessing the relevance and accuracy of the content of this publication. The Grains Research and Development Corporation will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on the information in this publication. Products may be identified by proprietary or trade names to help readers identify particular types of products but this is not, and is not intended to be, an endorsement or recommendation of any product or manufacturer referred to. Other products may perform as well or better than those specifically referred to. 3 INOCULATING LEGUMES: A PRACTICAL GUIDE INOCULATING … Each year Australian growers sow inoculated legume seed on about 2.5 million hectares, equivalent to 50 per cent of the area sown to legumes. All of the nitrogen fixed annually by legumes growing on these newly sown areas together with that fixed by the 22.5 million hectares of established and regenerating legume-based pastures can be attributed to either current or past inoculation. The total amount of nitrogen fixed by the agricultural legumes is estimated at 2.7 million tonnes annually, with a nominal value for the industry of close to $4 billion annually… CONTENTS Foreword .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Acknowledgements ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................7 Authors ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................8 FAQs.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................9 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................11 1.1 The practice of inoculation ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Inoculants and inoculation of legumes in Australia ................................................................................................................................................. 11 1.3 This handbook ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 2. Rhizobia and the rhizobia-legume symbiosis .....................................................................................................................................................13 2.1 What are rhizobia? ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 2.2 Specificity of rhizobia ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.3 What do rhizobia need to prosper? .................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.4 The process of nodulation .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Root-hair infection ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 2.6 Nodule types ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 2.7 Other important symbioses that fix nitrogen ................................................................................................................................................................ 16 2.8 Causes of poor nitrogen fixation – legume and rhizobia incompatibility................................................................................................ 16 3. Number and nitrogen fixation capacity of rhizobia in soils ...............................................................................................................17 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 17 3.2 How do we know if a soil has the right rhizobia? .................................................................................................................................................... 17 3.3 How many soil rhizobia are needed for prompt nodulation? .......................................................................................................................... 17 3.4 Measuring the number of rhizobia in soil ........................................................................................................................................................................ 17 3.5 What numbers of rhizobia persist in soils? ................................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.6 Factors affecting the survival of rhizobia in soil ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 3.7 Diversity of soil rhizobia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.8 How well do the soil rhizobia fix nitrogen with legumes? .................................................................................................................................. 22 3.9 Dealing with soil rhizobia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 3.10 Concluding comments .................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Specificity in Legume-Rhizobia Symbioses
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Specificity in Legume-Rhizobia Symbioses Mitchell Andrews * and Morag E. Andrews Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +64-3-423-0692 Academic Editors: Peter M. Gresshoff and Brett Ferguson Received: 12 February 2017; Accepted: 21 March 2017; Published: 26 March 2017 Abstract: Most species in the Leguminosae (legume family) can fix atmospheric nitrogen (N2) via symbiotic bacteria (rhizobia) in root nodules. Here, the literature on legume-rhizobia symbioses in field soils was reviewed and genotypically characterised rhizobia related to the taxonomy of the legumes from which they were isolated. The Leguminosae was divided into three sub-families, the Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae and Papilionoideae. Bradyrhizobium spp. were the exclusive rhizobial symbionts of species in the Caesalpinioideae, but data are limited. Generally, a range of rhizobia genera nodulated legume species across the two Mimosoideae tribes Ingeae and Mimoseae, but Mimosa spp. show specificity towards Burkholderia in central and southern Brazil, Rhizobium/Ensifer in central Mexico and Cupriavidus in southern Uruguay. These specific symbioses are likely to be at least in part related to the relative occurrence of the potential symbionts in soils of the different regions. Generally, Papilionoideae species were promiscuous in relation to rhizobial symbionts, but specificity for rhizobial genus appears to hold at the tribe level for the Fabeae (Rhizobium), the genus level for Cytisus (Bradyrhizobium), Lupinus (Bradyrhizobium) and the New Zealand native Sophora spp. (Mesorhizobium) and species level for Cicer arietinum (Mesorhizobium), Listia bainesii (Methylobacterium) and Listia angolensis (Microvirga).
    [Show full text]
  • Rhynchosia Capitata (Heyne Ex Roth) DC
    ANALYSIS Vol. 19, 2018 ANALYSIS ARTICLE ISSN 2319–5746 EISSN 2319–5754 Species Pollination ecology of a rare prostrate herb, Rhynchosia capitata (Heyne ex Roth) DC. (Fabaceae) in the Southern Eastern Ghats, Andhra Pradesh, India Aluri Jacob Solomon Raju1☼, Banisetti Dileepu Kumar2, Kunuku Venkata Ramana3 1. Department of Environmental Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India 2. Department of Botany, M R College (Autonomous), Vizianagaram 535 002, India 3. Department of Botany, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India ☼Correspondent author: A.J. Solomon Raju, Department of Environmental Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India Email: [email protected] Article History Received: 02 June 2018 Accepted: 17 July 2018 Published: July 2018 Citation Aluri Jacob Solomon Raju, Banisetti Dileepu Kumar, Kunuku Venkata Ramana. Pollination ecology of a rare prostrate herb, Rhynchosia capitata (Heyne ex Roth) DC. (Fabaceae) in the Southern Eastern Ghats, Andhra Pradesh, India. Species, 2018, 19, 91-103 Publication License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. General Note Article is recommended to print as color digital version in recycled paper. 91 Page © 2018 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved. www.discoveryjournals.org OPEN ACCESS ANALYSIS ARTICLE ABSTRACT The current study aims to investigate the pollination mechanism, sexual system, breeding system, pollinators and seed dispersal in Rhynchosia capitata, a rare prostrate herb in the southern Eastern Ghats, Andhra Pradesh, India. The study indicated that R. capitata is a prostrate, climbing herb and winter season bloomer. It is hermaphroditic, self-compatible and facultatively xenogamous which is essentially vector-dependent. The flowers are papilionaceous with zygomorphic symmetry and exhibit explosive pollination mechanism associated with primary pollen presentation pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology of Rhynchosia Minima (L.) DC. (Fabaceae)In The
    ECOLOGIA BALKANICA 2019, Vol. 11, Issue 1 June 2019 pp. 108-126 Pollination Ecology of Rhynchosia minima (L.) DC. (Fabaceae) in the Southern Eastern Ghats, Andhra Pradesh, India A.J. Solomon Raju1*, K. Venkata Ramana2 Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, INDIA 1 - Department of Environmental Sciences 2 - Department of Botany *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract. Rhynchosia minima is prostrate climbing herb. In India it flowers during September-March with peak flowering during January. The flowers are hermaphroditic, nectariferous, self-compatible and have explosive pollination mechanism adapted for pollination by bees. They do not fruit through autonomous selfing but fruit through manipulated selfing, geitonogamy and xenogamy mediated by pollen vectoring bees. The flowers not visited by bees fall off while those visited and pollinated by them set fruit. Seed dispersal occurs by explosive pod dehiscence. Perennial root stock resurrects back to life during rainy season. Seeds also germinate at the same time but their continued growth is subject to the availability of soil moisture content. Therefore, R. minima expands its population size and succeeds as a weed in water-saturated habitats only. The plant is used as medicine, animal forage and human food and hence it has the potential for exploitation commercially. Key words: economic value, explosive pod dehiscence, explosive pollination mechanism, hermaphroditism, melittophily, Rhynchosia minima. Introduction suaveolens and R. viscosa. These species are Rhynchosia is a genus of the legume either climbers or shrubs (MADHAVA CHETTY family fabaceae, tribe phaseoleae and et al., 2008). Of these, R. minima is a subtribe cajaninae (LACKEY, 1981; pantropical species but it is thought to be JAYASURIYA, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Microsatellite Marker-Based Genetic Diversity Analysis and Developing Synthetic Varieties in Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.)
    Microsatellite Marker-based Genetic Diversity Analysis and Developing Synthetic Varieties in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Maksatbek Amanov Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Faculty of Landscape Planning, Horticulture and Agricultural Science (LTJ), Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Thesis for MSc Degree in Biology. 60 HEC. A2E Independent work at LTJ Faculty, SLU Alnarp, 2012 Microsatellite Marker-based Genetic Diversity Analysis and Developing Synthetic Varieties in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Maksatbek Amanov Supervisor: Mulatu Geleta, Assistant Professor, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Co-supervisor: Hans-Arne Jönsson, former Plant Breeder, Landskrona Examiner: Helena Persson Hovmalm, Researcher and project coordinator, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Credits: 60 HEC Level: A2E Course Title: Degree Project for MSc thesis in Biology Subject: Biology Course code: IN0813 Programme/Education: MSc in Biology Place of publication: Alnarp Year of Publication: 2012 Online publication: http://stud.epsilon.slu.se Cover illustration: Photo of the alfalfa variety Bereke grown in a field in Kyrgyzstan. Photo: Maksatbek Amanov Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Faculty of Landscape planning, Horticulture and Agricultural Science Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trichomes in Trifolieae
    Prof. Indian Acad. Sei, Vol. 85 B, No. 2, 1977, pp. 77-89. Trichomes in Trifolieae MOHINI GUPTA AND Y. S. MURTY Department of Botany, Institute of Advanced Studies, Meerut University, Meerut 250001 MS received 1 March 1976 ; in revised form 13 July 1976 ABSTRACT Trichomes of 39 species of Trifolieae belonging to six genera have been worked out. On the basis of structure they are classified into nine types and ontogeny of only four types could be studied. The structure and organographic distribution of each lype has been describect. All types of triehomes have been initiated from single initial cell. 1. INTRODUCTION Trichomes of Papilionaceaeespecially those of Trifolieae have been described by Solereder, 1 Metcalfe and Chalk, °" Fahn, 3 Toma, a Toma and Danis, 5 Toma and Buznea, 6 Shah and Kothari, 7 and Kothari and Shah? The use of trichomes in taxonomic delimitation has been stressed by Toma 4 in species of Trifolium, Shah and Kothari ~ and Kothari and Shah s in members of Viceae and Hedysareae. However, no detailed work is available on the distribution of trichomes on different organs and their ontogeny in Trifolieae. Therefore, triehomes of 39 species (tables 1, 2) belonging to all the six genera of Trifolieae have been worked out in detail. Customaiy micro- technique methods were employed. Epidermal peels were stained with Delafield's haematoxylin and mounted in glycerine. 2. OBSERVATIONS On the basis of their structure the nonglandular and glandular triehomes observed in members of Trifolieac arc classified as nine types. The ontogeny of four of the nine types has been studied.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Management Options for the Clover Root Curculio (Sitona Hispidulus), a Pest of Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa) in the Intermountain West
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2020 An Evaluation of Management Options for the Clover Root Curculio (Sitona hispidulus), a Pest of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in the Intermountain West Kaitlin A. Rim Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Rim, Kaitlin A., "An Evaluation of Management Options for the Clover Root Curculio (Sitona hispidulus), a Pest of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in the Intermountain West" (2020). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7716. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7716 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN EVALUATION OF MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR THE CLOVER ROOT CURCULIO (Sitona hispidulus), A PEST OF ALFALFA (Medicago sativa) IN THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST by Kaitlin A. Rim A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Ecology Approved: ________________________ ________________________ Ricardo A. Ramirez, Ph.D. Noelle Beckman, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ________________________ ________________________ Erik Wenninger, Ph.D. Richard S. Inouye, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice Provost for Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2019 ii Copyright © Kaitlin Rim 2019 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT An evaluation of management options for the Clover Root Curculio (Sitona hispidulus), a pest of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in the Intermountain West by Kaitlin A.
    [Show full text]
  • Apport De La Bioinformatique À L'inventaire Des Légumineuses D
    NO d’ordre : 02/2003 – M/S.N UNIVERSITE DES SCIENCES ET DE LA TECHNOLOGIE HOUARI BOUMEDIENE Faculté des Sciences Biologiques Thèse présentée pour l’obtention du grade de Magistère en Sciences de la Nature Spécialité : Ecobiologie et Amélioration Végétale Par SAHBANE Sofiane Sujet APPORT DE LA BIOINFORMATIQUE A L’INVENTAIRE DES LEGUMINEUSES D’ALGERIE Soutenue le 16 mars 2003, devant les membres du jury ci-dessous : ME. N, BOUGUEDOURRA Professeur à l’USTHB Présidente MELLE F, AÏD Maître de conférences à l’USTHB Directrice de thèse M. S, AMRANI Chargé de cours à l’USTHB Co-directeur de thèse M. A, ABDELGUERFI Maître de conférences à l’INA Examinateur M. R, AMIROUCHE Chargé de cours à l’USTHB Examinateur 1 Avant-propos Ce présent travail a été codirigé par Mademoiselle F., Aid, maître de conférences à l’USTHB, et Monsieur S., Amrani, chargé de cours à l’USTHB. Qu’ils soient remerciés pour leur conseils, orientations et remarques pertinentes. Madame le Professeur Bouguedoura m’a fait l’honneur de présider le jury de cette thèse. Je tiens à lui exprimer ici ma profonde reconnaissance. J’exprime ma gratitude à Monsieur Abdelguerfi, maître de conférences à l’INA, pour avoir voulu participer au jury de cette thèse. J’adresse également mes vifs remerciements à Monsieur Amirouche, chargé de cours à l’USTHB, pour avoir bien voulu participer au jury de cette thèse. 2 Résumé La caractérisation du microsymbiote (le Rhizobium) passe aussi par la reconnaissance du macrosymbiote : la légumineuse. Pour rendre fiable les déterminations de la plante, nous avons eu recours à une approche informatique, en mettant en place un système d’identification assistée par ordinateur (logiciel Delta).
    [Show full text]
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 6Th Edition
    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 6th Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may The International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) be reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, ©2014 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) without prior permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof. P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema ii 6th Edition 2013 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Contents Contents Preface ...................................................... iv L ................................................................41 Acknowledgements .................................... v M ...............................................................46 Symbols and abbreviations ....................... vi N ...............................................................50 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names ........... 1 O ...............................................................51
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology of an Endemic Medicinal Shrub, Rhynchosia Beddomei Baker (Fabaceae)
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318210317 POLLINATION ECOLOGY OF AN ENDEMIC MEDICINAL SHRUB, RHYNCHOSIA BEDDOMEI BAKER (FABACEAE) Article · January 2017 CITATIONS READS 0 104 3 authors: Jacob Solomon Raju Aluri Prasada RAO Chappidi Andhra University Andhra University 376 PUBLICATIONS 778 CITATIONS 6 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE M. Mallikarjuna Rao Indian Council of Agricultural Research 10 PUBLICATIONS 3 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Govt. of India, New Delhi View project News paper report in The Hindu View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jacob Solomon Raju Aluri on 05 July 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Journal of Palynology Vol. 53 (2017) : 149-176 Editor: A.J. Solomon Raju Today and Tomorrow’s Printers & Publishers, New Delhi-110 002 (India) POLLINATION ECOLOGY OF AN ENDEMIC MEDICINAL SHRUB, RHYNCHOSIA BEDDOMEI BAKER (FABACEAE) A J Solomon Raju1, Ch. Prasada Rao2 and M. Mallikarjuna Rao3 1,2Department of Environmental Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India 2Department of Botany, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India Abstract Rhynchosia beddomei is an endemic deciduous shrub. It flowers during December- March with peak flowering during January. The flowers are hermaphroditic, nectariferous, self-compatible and have explosive pollination mechanism adapted for pollination by bees, especially carpenter bees. They do not fruit through autonomous selfing but fruit through manipulated selfing, geitonogamy and xenogamy mediated by pollen vectoring bees. The flowers not visited by bees fall off while those visited and pollinated by them set fruit.
    [Show full text]
  • European Red List of Vascular Plants Melanie Bilz, Shelagh P
    European Red List of Vascular Plants Melanie Bilz, Shelagh P. Kell, Nigel Maxted and Richard V. Lansdown European Red List of Vascular Plants Melanie Bilz, Shelagh P. Kell, Nigel Maxted and Richard V. Lansdown IUCN Global Species Programme IUCN Regional Office for Europe IUCN Species Survival Commission Published by the European Commission This publication has been prepared by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission or IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission or IUCN. Citation: Bilz, M., Kell, S.P., Maxted, N. and Lansdown, R.V. 2011. European Red List of Vascular Plants. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Design and layout by: Tasamim Design - www.tasamim.net Printed by: The Colchester Print Group, United Kingdom Picture credits on cover page: Narcissus nevadensis is endemic to Spain where it has a very restricted distribution. The species is listed as Endangered and is threatened by modifications to watercourses and overgrazing. © Juan Enrique Gómez. All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder. Available from: Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, http://bookshop.europa.eu IUCN Publications Services, www.iucn.org/publications A catalogue of IUCN publications is also available.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Global Red List Assessment of Selected Crop Wild Relatives: Conservation Status, Analysis and Implications
    A PRELIMINARY GLOBAL RED LIST ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED CROP WILD RELATIVES: CONSERVATION STATUS, ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS By LAURA CHARLOTTE RHODES A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MSCI BY RESEARCH School of Biosciences College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham September 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. A PRELIMINARY GLOBAL RED LIST ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED CROP WILD RELATIVES: CONSERVATION STATUS, ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS Abstract Crop wild relatives (CWR) are valuable socio-economic resources that provide a genetic reservoir of potential adaptability for our food crops. Despite their importance, these vital resources are in dire need of sustainable and strategic conservation. The IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria are the world’s most widely accepted methodology for assessing species’ risk of extinction, and was applied to a selection of priority CWR extracted from the Harlan and de Wet CWR Inventory (Vincent et al., 2013). Preliminary results show that, seventeen CWR species (6.3%) were found to be threatened with extinction, with 0.7% (two species) being Critically Endangered (CR), 3.4% (nine species) being Endangered (EN), and 2.2% (six species) being Vulnerable (VU).
    [Show full text]
  • Cytogenetic Studies in Some Species of Medicago L. in Iran
    IUFS Journal of Biology Research Article IUFS J Biol 2014, 73(1): 21-30 Cytogenetic Studies in Some Species of Medicago L. in Iran 1* 2 Sara Sadeghian , Seyed Mohsen Hesamzadeh Hejazi 1Research Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources of Fars Province Province, Iran 2Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands (Biotechnology Department), Tehran- Iran Abstract A karyological study using the Image Analysis System was conducted of eight taxa of the genus Medicago L. namely M. radiata L., M. intertexta (L.) Mill. M. orbicularis (L.) Bart. , M. laciniata (L.) Mill., M. coronate (L.) bartal, M. rigidula (L.) All., M. polymorpha L.and M. scutellata (L.) Mill. used as forage plants from different geographic origins of Fars province from Iran. We found the two usual basic chromosome numbers in the genus, x=7 and x=8. In the group with x=7, two diploid (2n=14), one tetraploid (2n=28) species and in the group with x=8, five diploid (2n=16) species were found. Detailed karyotype analysis allows us to group the different species and to postulate relationships among them. Keywords: Chromosome, Fabaceae, karyology, Medicago, taxonomy *Corresponding Author:Sara Sadeghian (e-mail: [email protected]) (Received: 09.12.2013 Accepted: 21.07.2014) Introduction fruit. Both polyploids and aneuploids are found Medicago genus belongs to the tribe within Medicago genus (Lesins and Lesins Trifolieae (Fabaceae, family). According 1979). to the IPNI reports the taxon includes about Polyploidy and chromosome rearrangement 396 annual and perennial species that have a in the genus Medicago have resulted in the widespread distribution from the Mediterranean genetic isolation of genome groups.
    [Show full text]