Chariots of Fire___Whole 002.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chariots of Fire___Whole 002.Pdf 0 THE MAKING OF “CHARIOTS OF FIRE” From memory, it was in late 1978 or early 1979 that I first read in the Sunday Times that Colin Welland was scripting a movie on Harold Abrahams and Eric Liddell, gold- medallists in the 1924 Paris Olympic Games. It bore a less than inspiring title, and was called “The Runners”. Don’t ask me how, but I somehow secured Colin’s address, wrote to him offering my help, and within a week he was sitting opposite me in my living room. It immediately became clear to me that Colin Welland was a sports nutter. OK, perhaps not quite as nutty as me, not a fanatic who had devoted his life to sport, but a fellow nutter nevertheless. Thus, we immediately got along together like a house on fire, and within a week I was appointed to the role of “script consultant”, at the prodigious sum of £500. Colin was still in the early stages of his research on the film, which was the product of someone called David Puttnam, at the head of a film- company called Enigma Productions. The central themes of the film would be the anti-Semitism endured by Abrahams at Cambridge University and Liddell’s refusal, on religious grounds, to compete in the Sunday Final of the 100 metres. In the case of Abrahams, I had the advantage of knowing him, as he had in effect been my previous employer, as a National Athletics Coach. Abrahams, who had died a couple of years earlier, had been a member of a privileged Blazerati, a group who believed that they had been given by birth the Divine Right to rule British athletics. He was not therefore an immediately likeable character, and it would not be to be easy for Colin to make him one. And, to my knowledge, Abraham’s being Jewish had not hindered him in reaching the ruling class of British athletics. Eric Liddell, on the other hand, he had the advantage of being a Scot, he was a man of a totally different complexion. But I pointed out to Colin that he had not refused to compete in the 100 metres, simply because he had not been chosen by his country for that event in the first place. No, as far back as 1923 Liddell had known that the 100 metre final would be on a Sunday, and as a devout Christian, he did not wish to compete on the Lord’s Day. He had instead therefore chosen to go for the two longer sprints, the 200 metres and the 400 metres. But I was to learn early in my role as script-consultant that in the area of biographic feature film, writers tend to be free in their attitude to literal truth. All that was 1 going to matter was that the characters of the two men were accurately portrayed, within a plausible plot. And so I kept to myself my concerns about historical accuracy for the moment and let Colin get on with his research And get on with it he did, but he soon came up against his first problem, difficulties in securing the help of another medallist, Douglas Lowe, who had achieved gold in the Paris 800 metres. Colin never made clear to me what problems he was having with Lowe, but my reaction was immediate. And it was that we take him out of the plot. Because I felt that Lowe, being another gold-medallist, might well take attention away from our two principals, Abrahams and Liddell. Colin should therefore create a lighter, aristocratic contrast to our two principals, and I therefore suggested the fictitious Lord Linsey. I chose the 400metre hurdles as his event, not because it echoed Lord Burleigh’ s later achievement in Amsterdam in 1928, but because I felt that it might be possible to train an actor in an event with modest technical demands. These were ones which could be made even more modest by taking the hurdle down by six inches. After all, no one in the audience could possibly notice. We were, by now, into mid-1979, and it was now time to meet Puttnam and the director Hugh Hudson. Hudson, an Old Etonian, seemed to me to have arrived from some distant planet. David Puttnam, on the other hand, was quite different. Deriving from a more modest background, he made no similar display of effortless superiority, having navigated his way through the demanding world of commercial films. I was soon to find Puttnam to be a leader of quite a different calibre from those like Harold Abrahams whom I had encountered in athletics. We all came together for the first time at a Piccadilly club, and it was at this point that Puttnam asked if I might extend my role and act as a sort of Technical Director. This would mean choosing the actors for the physical roles, training them, then making certain that that the film’s athletics sequences looked real. For, although athletics would occupy less than a tenth of the running-time, it lay at the heart of the film. If, therefore, its portrayal failed to convince, then no one would have much interest in the other two hours. And so it was back to the script. I had been for weeks boring the pants off Colin with my yarns about the famous New Year Powderhall professional sprint, and he now suggested that we have Liddell run in it. No, I replied, the issue of his amateur status would prevent that. But, I suggested, why not have us introduce Liddell in a 2 Highland Games, deep in the heather and the hills? Colin immediately agreed, and inserted a new scene, but more of that later. So now, now let’s move on to October 1979, and to a sodden cinder athletics track in Putney and thirty one shivering actors, standing before me, awaiting my commands. Alas, there was a significant lack of muscle on display, for those were the days long before Health Clubs and rippling abdominals. It was therefore not perhaps a surprise that several of my prospective Olympians were sick during their warm-up. “Remember Tom,” said David Puttnam .“We’ll go by your choice. So just give us the ones that you think you can make into athletes.” Easier said than done, unless I had suddenly acquired the powers of a Gypsy Petulengro. Because it was impossible to predict how an actor’s muscles might respond to training in sprints and hurdles, with hamstrings ever-ready to twang and sensitive Achilles tendons begging to become inflamed. So this was surely going to be a shot in the dark. Nevertheless, after an hour and a half in the freezing cold, I had chosen two actors Ben Cross and Ian Charleson for the main roles and another four for the supporting parts. David Puttnam smiled. “Those were exactly the two men that we wanted, Tom,” he said. “I really don’t know how you did it.” Neither did I. Thus, in November 1979, with six months to go to the 1924 Olympic Games, I set about training six actors who had never in their lives taken part in athletics, not only to compete, but to convince an audience that they were athletes. And to coach two of them to win Olympic gold medals. Thus it was that in mid-November 1979 that I began to prepare my motley crew of apprehensive actors for what was soon to become “Chariots of Fire”. I use the word “apprehensive” advisedly, because in discussion, though none expressed any doubt about his capacity as an actor, not one had expressed any confidence in his athletic ability. 3 But first, first we still had to find an actor to play my fictitious hurdler, Lord Lindsay. And it was thus that Puttnam and Hudson now brought to the St. Albans track a fine young Scots actor, who shall be nameless, for reasons that you will soon understand. At first, all went very well, with his running as just as good as that of Ian Charleson, Ben Cross and the others had been back at Putney. True, he had no background in athletics but then neither had any my other future Olympians. But soon the moment of truth eventually arrived when I had to present my Scot with the actual clearance of a hurdle. I put the barrier down to its lowest point, at about thirty centimeters. But on being confronted with the hurdle, my prospective Olympian suddenly went pale and refused to make any attempt to clear it. This was perhaps not surprising, for it probably represented for him a personal best in high jump. He was immediately placed in the next taxi to Heathrow Airport by David Puttnam, and we all gloomily returned to my house. There, Puttnam confessed to me that he had for some time known that our Scot had been known to be susceptible to the occasional dram. I saw no great purpose in discussing the extent of his alcoholic habits, but we nevertheless still had to find ourselves a Lord Lindsey. But now another problem arose, a few weeks before I was to set off to the Lake Placid Winter Olympics as coach to our national bobsleigh team. My actors had assembled at my house and we were discussing their training for the two weeks that I would be away. Then Ian Charleson spoke. “Tom,” he said. “We have been training for over a month, but so far Enigma, they have paid us absolutely nothing.” “Oh.
Recommended publications
  • G on Page 6- ‘ MANCHESTER, CONK., FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 4V 1927: Riisasn' PAGES) PRICE THREE CENTS
    VOL. XLI., NO. 107. Classified AdTertising on Page 6- ‘ MANCHESTER, CONK., FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 4v 1927: riisaSN' PAGES) PRICE THREE CENTS THIS PADLOCK NO Bury Politics in Exploration B O J m WORK BOOZE,BARRIER FIGHTINGPLANS Protected from Cops 2 Boys GROWS: GIVES Who Passed Hooch Through OUST ECONOMY Hole in Floor. ' TOWNraOBLQi New Britain Feb. 4.— John A T W « G T 0 N Smi'gel, 42, of 24 Orange street, was found guilty in po­ lice court today bn two counts Retirement of All Selectmen of liquor law violations. Ac­ Administration Quits Its cording to the police who raid-, FREAKISH BIG GALE U. 5 . Pact. ed his home last night, when - - I Next Year Would Serious­ the officers tried to enter the Fight With Preparedness cellar of Smigel’g home they ROUGH IN PRANKS For Defense is Reported found the door of the cellar Men in Congress on Army ly Handicap Town; Likely padlocked and an iron bar <?> placed to block their entrance. Candidates Sought. The police sent to a fire de­ and Marine Corps. DOING TALES TO partment station, procured Bombards New Haven Train, Fang, Defender o f Shanghai crowbars and broke the door PAY 3 MILLION Wlietlier or not Manchester has down. In the cellar they found Washington, Feb. 4.— ^Virtually Plays Hob at Boston and Against Cantonese, SaU outgiown its present form of gov­ two young sons of Smigel nine Young Vanderbilt Says He abandoning its fight with the pre­ ernment -will be thoroughly tested and twelve, whose duties were Will Settle Up If it Takes during the next year when the reins to hand up the liquor as fast paredness bloc in Congress, the-ad­ Elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Missions and Film Jamie S
    Missions and Film Jamie S. Scott e are all familiar with the phenomenon of the “Jesus” city children like the film’s abused New York newsboy, Little Wfilm, but various kinds of movies—some adapted from Joe. In Susan Rocks the Boat (1916; dir. Paul Powell) a society girl literature or life, some original in conception—have portrayed a discovers meaning in life after founding the Joan of Arc Mission, variety of Christian missions and missionaries. If “Jesus” films while a disgraced seminarian finds redemption serving in an give us different readings of the kerygmatic paradox of divine urban mission in The Waifs (1916; dir. Scott Sidney). New York’s incarnation, pictures about missions and missionaries explore the East Side mission anchors tales of betrayal and fidelity inTo Him entirely human question: Who is or is not the model Christian? That Hath (1918; dir. Oscar Apfel), and bankrolling a mission Silent movies featured various forms of evangelism, usually rekindles a wealthy couple’s weary marriage in Playthings of Pas- Protestant. The trope of evangelism continued in big-screen and sion (1919; dir. Wallace Worsley). Luckless lovers from different later made-for-television “talkies,” social strata find a fresh start together including musicals. Biographical at the End of the Trail mission in pictures and documentaries have Virtuous Sinners (1919; dir. Emmett depicted evangelists in feature films J. Flynn), and a Salvation Army mis- and television productions, and sion worker in New York’s Bowery recent years have seen the burgeon- district reconciles with the son of the ing of Christian cinema as a distinct wealthy businessman who stole her genre.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxford V Cambridge Varsity Sports
    Fixtures 2013 Changing Times 1 The format of the Achilles Annual Report went largely un‐ ACHILLES CLUB changed from 1920 unl the 1960’s (and if any one can Saturday 16th February ‐ Varsity Field Events & Relays ‐ Lee Valley unearth the lost Reports of 1921‐23 we would be thrilled!). 23‐24th February ‐ BUCS Indoors ‐ Sheffield EIS It was then a small A5 booklet, containing a couple of pages ANNUAL REPORT Saturday 9th March – CUAC Dinner describing the Club’s acvies during the year, the results of the Varsity Match and other compeons, and a compre‐ 13th‐23rd March—OUAC Warm Weather Training ‐ Portugal hensive list of members and their addresses. 24th‐31st March ‐ CUAC Warm Weather Training‐ Malta 3rd‐19th April ‐ Oxford & Cambridge US Tour 6th April ‐ Oxford & Cambridge v Penn & Cornell ‐ Cornell www.achilles.org th 2012 15 April – American Achilles Foundaon Dinner, at Harvard ‐ contact Tom Blodge [email protected] 16th April ‐ Oxford 7 Cambridge v Harvard & Yale – Harvard Saturday 27th April ‐ Achilles: Kinnaird/Sward Meeng – Kingston‐upon‐ Thames Sunday 28th April ‐ CUAC Sports ‐ Wilberforce Road 4‐6th May ‐ BUCS Outdoors ‐ Bedford Saturday 18th May ‐ Varsity Sports ‐ Wilberforce Road, Cambridge During the 1970’s and early 1980’s publicaon lapsed, and Achilles Dinner, at St Catharine’s. Chief Guest: Jon Ridgeon. Contact Tom Dowie when I revived it in 1986 it was in A4 format. Over the [email protected] years, as technology and my IT skills have improved I’ve Wednesday 29th May ‐ Achilles v Loughborough ‐ Loughborough sought to expand the content and refine its presentaon, Saturday 29 June ‐ Achilles, LICC Round One ‐ Allianz Park (formerly but always maintaining the style and identy of the Reports Copthall Stadium) of the Club’s first 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Athletes in 1924 Film
    29 June 2012 BFI UNCOVERS “CHARIOTS OF FIRE” ORIGINAL ATHLETES IN 1924 FILM Harold Abrahams in the lead in Running – A Sport That Creates Both Bodily and Mental Health (1924). Photo credit: courtesy of BFI National Archive A routine search for footage in the BFI National Archive has uncovered an all-but-forgotten film Running - A Sport That Creates Both Bodily and Mental Health (1924) featuring two of Britain’s most famous Olympic athletes, Harold Abrahams and Eric Liddell, made legendary by their portrayal in Hugh Hudson’s Oscar-winning film Chariots of Fire. With Olympic fever sweeping the nation and a July nationwide re-release for Chariots of Fire along with the release of new film Fast Girls this is a timely reminder of Britain’s great Olympic heritage and a chance to see two of Britain’s greatest Olympic running heroes. This rarely-seen documentary footage will feature in a 4 minute extract on the BFI’s YouTube channel today. www.YouTube.com/BFIFilms The film’s full title is Running - A Sport That Creates Both Bodily and Mental Health (1924): Juvenile Races at a Country Sports Meeting, and scenes from the 1924 Olympics with W.M.Cotterell, Harold Abrahams, E.H. Liddell, D.G. Lowe, H.B.Stallard, G.M.Butler and D.McLeod Wright. 19 minutes approx @ 16 fps dir. John Betts Bryony Dixon, curator, Silent Film, BFI National Archive said: “How incredibly timely to come across the real Harold Abrahams and Eric Liddell in this beautiful quality footage with less than a month to go before the 2012 Olympics.” The film has been in the BFI National Archive collections since 1938 and was viewed by producer David Puttnam and scriptwriter Colin Welland when they were researching the Chariots of Fire story 40 years later.
    [Show full text]
  • ME 500 (Online) Credit Hours: 3 the Rt Rev Dr Grant Lemarquand [email protected] [email protected]
    FALL 2020 Course Title: Introduction to World Mission Course Number: ME 500 (online) Credit Hours: 3 The Rt Rev Dr Grant LeMarquand [email protected] [email protected] I. COURSE DESCRIPTION This course will introduce the student to the biblical, theological and historical aspects of world mission and explore the scope of mission practice. Attention will be given to an ex- amination of issues related to evangelism, mission, missions, dialogue, the persecuted church, unreached peoples, cross-cultural communication, justice, spiritual warfare, and the place of mission in the local church. II. TEXT BOOKS Required Books • Bauckham, Richard. The Bible and Mission: Christian Witness in a Postmodern World. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2003. ISBN: 1-84227-242-X. • Stark, Rodney. The Rise of Christianity. San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1997. ISBN: 0-06- 067701-5. • LeMarquand, Grant, ed. “The Gospel in the Public Square: Essays by and in honor of Lesslie Newbigin.” Trinity Journal for Theology & Ministry 4/2 (2010). This is a Trinity School for Ministry publication and will be made available for a very reasonable cost! • Mountstephen, Philip. The Bishop of Truro’s Independent Review for the Foreign Secretary of FCO Support for Persecuted Christians. Final Report and Recommendations 2019. Available online at: https://christianpersecutionreview.org.uk/report/ Not Required, but really fabulous and I wish I could require them all ... • Bosch, David. Transforming Mission. Maryknoll: Orbis, 1991. • Goheen, Michael W. Introducing Christian Mission Today: Scripture, History and Issues. Downers Grove: IVP, 2014. ISBN: 978-0-8308-4047-2. • Tennent, Timothy C. World Missions: A Trinitarian Missiology for the Twenty-first Century.
    [Show full text]
  • FILMS and THEIR STARS 1. CK: OW Citizen Kane: Orson Welles 2
    FILMS AND THEIR STARS 1. CK: OW Citizen Kane: Orson Welles 2. TGTBATU: CE The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Clint Eastwood 3. RFTS: KM Reach for the Sky: Kenneth More 4. FG; TH Forest Gump: Tom Hanks 5. TGE: SM/CB The Great Escape: Steve McQueen and Charles Bronson ( OK. I got it wrong!) 6. TS: PN/RR The Sting: Paul Newman and Robert Redford 7. GWTW: VL Gone with the Wind: Vivien Leigh 8. MOTOE: PU Murder on the Orient Express; Peter Ustinov (but it wasn’t it was Albert Finney! DOTN would be correct) 9. D: TH/HS/KB Dunkirk: Tom Hardy, Harry Styles, Kenneth Branagh 10. HN: GC High Noon: Gary Cooper 11. TS: JN The Shining: Jack Nicholson 12. G: BK Gandhi: Ben Kingsley 13. A: NK/HJ Australia: Nicole Kidman, Hugh Jackman 14. OGP: HF On Golden Pond: Henry Fonda 15. TDD: LM/CB/TS The Dirty Dozen: Lee Marvin, Charles Bronson, Telly Savalas 16. A: MC Alfie: Michael Caine 17. TDH: RDN The Deer Hunter: Robert De Niro 18. GWCTD: ST/SP Guess who’s coming to Dinner: Spencer Tracy, Sidney Poitier 19. TKS: CF The King’s Speech: Colin Firth 20. LOA: POT/OS Lawrence of Arabia: Peter O’Toole, Omar Shariff 21. C: ET/RB Cleopatra: Elizabeth Taylor, Richard Burton 22. MC: JV/DH Midnight Cowboy: Jon Voight, Dustin Hoffman 23. P: AP/JL Psycho: Anthony Perkins, Janet Leigh 24. TG: JW True Grit: John Wayne 25. TEHL: DS The Eagle has landed: Donald Sutherland. 26. SLIH: MM Some like it Hot: Marilyn Monroe 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Set in Scotland a Film Fan's Odyssey
    Set in Scotland A Film Fan’s Odyssey visitscotland.com Cover Image: Daniel Craig as James Bond 007 in Skyfall, filmed in Glen Coe. Picture: United Archives/TopFoto This page: Eilean Donan Castle Contents 01 * >> Foreword 02-03 A Aberdeen & Aberdeenshire 04-07 B Argyll & The Isles 08-11 C Ayrshire & Arran 12-15 D Dumfries & Galloway 16-19 E Dundee & Angus 20-23 F Edinburgh & The Lothians 24-27 G Glasgow & The Clyde Valley 28-31 H The Highlands & Skye 32-35 I The Kingdom of Fife 36-39 J Orkney 40-43 K The Outer Hebrides 44-47 L Perthshire 48-51 M Scottish Borders 52-55 N Shetland 56-59 O Stirling, Loch Lomond, The Trossachs & Forth Valley 60-63 Hooray for Bollywood 64-65 Licensed to Thrill 66-67 Locations Guide 68-69 Set in Scotland Christopher Lambert in Highlander. Picture: Studiocanal 03 Foreword 03 >> In a 2015 online poll by USA Today, Scotland was voted the world’s Best Cinematic Destination. And it’s easy to see why. Films from all around the world have been shot in Scotland. Its rich array of film locations include ancient mountain ranges, mysterious stone circles, lush green glens, deep lochs, castles, stately homes, and vibrant cities complete with festivals, bustling streets and colourful night life. Little wonder the country has attracted filmmakers and cinemagoers since the movies began. This guide provides an introduction to just some of the many Scottish locations seen on the silver screen. The Inaccessible Pinnacle. Numerous Holy Grail to Stardust, The Dark Knight Scottish stars have twinkled in Hollywood’s Rises, Prometheus, Cloud Atlas, World firmament, from Sean Connery to War Z and Brave, various hidden gems Tilda Swinton and Ewan McGregor.
    [Show full text]
  • Spitting in the Soup Mark Johnson
    SPITTING IN THE SOUP INSIDE THE DIRTY GAME OF DOPING IN SPORTS MARK JOHNSON Copyright © 2016 by Mark Johnson All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic or photocopy or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations within critical articles and reviews. 3002 Sterling Circle, Suite 100 Boulder, Colorado 80301-2338 USA (303) 440-0601 · Fax (303) 444-6788 · E-mail [email protected] Distributed in the United States and Canada by Ingram Publisher Services A Cataloging-in-Publication record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN 978-1-937715-27-4 For information on purchasing VeloPress books, please call (800) 811-4210, ext. 2138, or visit www.velopress.com. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). Art direction by Vicki Hopewell Cover: design by Andy Omel; concept by Mike Reisel; illustration by Jean-Francois Podevin Text set in Gotham and Melior 16 17 18 / 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS Introduction ...................................... 1 1 The Origins of Doping ............................ 7 2 Pierre de Coubertin and the Fair-Play Myth ...... 27 3 The Fall of Coubertin’s Ideal ..................... 41 4 The Hot Roman Day When Doping Became Bad ..................................... 55 5 Doping Becomes a Crime........................ 75 6 The Birth of the World Anti-Doping Agency ..... 85 7 Doping and the Cold War........................ 97 8 Anabolic Steroids: Sports as Sputnik ..........
    [Show full text]
  • King Arthur and the Round Table Movie
    King Arthur And The Round Table Movie Keene is alee semestral after tolerable Price estopped his thegn numerically. Antirust Regan never equalises so virtuously or outflew any treads tongue-in-cheek. Dative Dennis instilling some tabarets after indwelling Henderson counterlights large. Everyone who joins must also sign or rent. Your britannica newsletter for arthur movies have in hollywood for a round table, you find the kings and the less good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Why has been chosen to find this table are not return from catholic wedding to. The king that, once and possess it lacks in modern telling us an enchanted lands. Get in and arthur movie screen from douglas in? There that lancelot has an exchange is eaten by a hit at britons, merlin argues against mordred accused of king arthur and the round table, years of the round tabletop has continued to. Cast: Sean Connery, Ben Cross, Liam Cunningham, Richard Gere, Julia Ormond, and Christopher Villiers. The original site you gonna remake this is one is king arthur marries her mother comes upon whom he and king arthur the movie on? British nobles defending their affection from the Saxon migration after the legions have retreated back to mainland Europe. Little faith as with our other important characters and king arthur, it have the powerful magic garden, his life by. The morning was directed by Joshua Logan. He and arthur, chivalry to strike a knife around romance novels and fireballs at a court in a last tellers of the ends of his. The Quest Elements in the Films of John Boorman.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION This study guide attempts to trace the production process o1 the forthcoming film War of the Buttons' from its Conception to its release in the cinema. In tracing this route students are asked to carry out a number of tasks, many of which relate directly to decisions which have to be made during film production. Following the development of this one film we have tried to draw conclusions about the mainstream film making process. However, it is important to bear one thing in mind. As the production accountant for 'War of the Buttons', John Trehy points out: "Each and every feature film I've worked on is completely different from every other, and can only be looked on a as prototype. The production process is always difficult when you're dealing with prototypes and this often explains why so many films exceed their original budgets. 'How can you be a million or two dollars over?' - is a question that is often asked. The reason is that certain kinds of films are unique and the production team must do things that have never been done before." Thus, whilst many of the processes which are dealt with in this guide could well hold good for other films, there are certain aspects which are unique. The guide examines both areas and encourages students to use their own experience of film viewing and cinema-going to explore both the generalities and the uniqueness. There is no attempt to show 'the wonderful world of filmmaking'; rather the guide reveals an industrial process, one in which the time spent on preparing for the film to be shot far outweighs the amount of time actually spent shooting.
    [Show full text]
  • Amateurism and Coaching Traditions in Twentieth Century British Sport
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by E-space: Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository Uneasy Bedfellows: Amateurism and Coaching Traditions in Twentieth Century British Sport Tegan Laura Carpenter A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2012 Tegan Carpenter July 2012 If you do well in sport and you train, ‘good show’, but if you do well in sport and you don’t train, ‘bloody good show’. Geoffrey Dyson, 1970 Tegan Carpenter July 2012 Dedication This thesis is proudly dedicated to my parents, Lynne and John, my two brothers, Dan and Will and my best friend, Steve - Thank you for always believing in me. Tegan Carpenter July 2012 Acknowledgments This thesis would not have been possible without the continued support of family, friends and colleagues. While I am unable to acknowledge you all individually - I will be forever indebted to you. To my supervisor, Dr Dave Day - I consider myself incredibly lucky to have had such an attentive and committed mentor. Someone who transformed the trudge of a PhD into an enjoyable journey, and because of this, I would not hesitate accepting the opportunity again (even after knowing the level of commitment required!). Thank you for never losing faith in me and for your constant support and patience along the way. I would also like to thank Dr Neil Carter and Professor Martin Hewitt for their comments and advice. Special thanks to Sam for being the best office buddy and allowing me to vent whenever necessary! To Margaret and the interviewees of this study – thank you for your input and donating your time.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Prawer Jhabvala's Adapted Screenplays
    Absorbing the Worlds of Others: Ruth Prawer Jhabvala’s Adapted Screenplays By Laura Fryer Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of a PhD degree at De Montfort University, Leicester. Funded by Midlands 3 Cities and the Arts and Humanities Research Council. June 2020 i Abstract Despite being a prolific and well-decorated adapter and screenwriter, the screenplays of Ruth Prawer Jhabvala are largely overlooked in adaptation studies. This is likely, in part, because her life and career are characterised by the paradox of being an outsider on the inside: whether that be as a European writing in and about India, as a novelist in film or as a woman in industry. The aims of this thesis are threefold: to explore the reasons behind her neglect in criticism, to uncover her contributions to the film adaptations she worked on and to draw together the fields of screenwriting and adaptation studies. Surveying both existing academic studies in film history, screenwriting and adaptation in Chapter 1 -- as well as publicity materials in Chapter 2 -- reveals that screenwriting in general is on the periphery of considerations of film authorship. In Chapter 2, I employ Sandra Gilbert’s and Susan Gubar’s notions of ‘the madwoman in the attic’ and ‘the angel in the house’ to portrayals of screenwriters, arguing that Jhabvala purposely cultivates an impression of herself as the latter -- a submissive screenwriter, of no threat to patriarchal or directorial power -- to protect herself from any negative attention as the former. However, the archival materials examined in Chapter 3 which include screenplay drafts, reveal her to have made significant contributions to problem-solving, characterisation and tone.
    [Show full text]