Ribozymes William G Scott

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ribozymes William G Scott COSTBI-455; NO OF PAGES 7 Ribozymes William G Scott The structural molecular biology of ribozymes took another [4,5] 70S ribosomes have now provided us with many great leap forward during the past two years. Before ribozymes new structural insights. However, the main focus of this were discovered in the early 1980s, all enzymes were thought review will be to survey the many advances made in to be proteins. No detailed structural information on ribozymes understanding the structural basis of ribozyme catalysis in became available until 1994. Now, within the past two years, other RNA systems. In reviewing these advances, it near atomic resolution crystal structures are available for seems noteworthy that many of the most important ones almost all of the known ribozymes. The latest additions include emerged from laboratories that are not primarily known as ribonuclease P, group I intron structures, the ribosome (the structural biology research groups, but rather are labora- peptidyl transferase appears to be a ribozyme) and several tories that focus primarily on the RNA molecules them- smaller ribozymes, including a Diels–Alderase, the glmS selves. Examples include Harry Noller’s ribosome group, ribozyme and a new hammerhead ribozyme structure that Norm Pace’s RNase P group, Tom Cech’s intron group reconciles 12 years of discord. Although not all ribozymes are and Scott Strobel’s RNA chemistry group. The blurring of metalloenzymes, acid-base catalysis appears to be a universal such distinctions will probably be a growing trend in the property shared by all ribozymes as well as many of their future of macromolecular structural studies and is an protein cousins. encouraging development. Addresses Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and The Center for the All ribozymes were believed originally to be metalloen- 2+ Molecular Biology of RNA, 228 Sinsheimer Laboratories, University of zymes, requiring Mg or other divalent metal ions for both California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA folding and catalysis. A ‘two-metal mechanism’ had been proposed [6] in which hydrated Mg2+ ions played the roles Corresponding author: Scott, William G ([email protected]) of general acids and bases. This prediction appears to have been correct for the group I intron (the specific context of Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2007, 17:1–7 the original proposal), as has now been revealed by Stahley and Strobel [7] (described below), but perhaps the most This review comes from a themed issue on Nucleic acids striking result is that it does not generalize to all ribozyme Edited by Dinshaw J Patel and Eric Westhof systems. Acid-base catalysis appears to be a catalytic strategy so fundamental that it occurs in both protein and RNA enzymes; in many cases, it seems that the 0959-440X/$ – see front matter RNA itself, rather than acting as a passive scaffold for # 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. metal ion binding, is an active participant in acid-base catalysis in the sense that nucleotide functional groups, DOI 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.05.003 rather than metal complexes, often mimic the roles that amino acids play in the active sites of protein enzymes. Several of the small self-cleaving RNAs as a consequence Introduction do not strictly require divalent metal ions for catalysis [8] Ribozymes are enzymes whose catalytic centers are com- and no divalent metal ions have yet been observed in the posed entirely of RNA and therefore do not require active site of the peptidyl transferase, the ribozyme that is proteins for catalysis (although many exist naturally as embedded in the ribosome. RNA–protein complexes). Their discovery in the early 1980s provided a potential logical escape from the con- Ribonuclease P undrum that plagues evolutionary molecular biology: Ribonuclease P (RNase P) was the first true RNA enzyme which came first, information-encoding nucleic acids or identified [9]. An RNA–protein complex, the catalytic proteins — including the enzymes needed to replicate subunit of bacterial RNase P is composed entirely of nucleic acids? If RNA can do both, it is a potential self- RNA (and it is thought that this is the case with the replicase and the ‘RNA world’ hypothesis is based on the eukaryotic version as well). It processes precursor tRNAs assumption that pre-biotic self-replicating molecules and other RNAs required for cellular metabolism. were composed of RNA. Although structural fragments of RNase P have been previously elucidated, two structures of the entire cata- Perhaps the most important (apparent) ribozyme is the lytic RNA subunit finally appeared simultaneously in ribosome, as the 23S RNA appears to comprise most if not 2005, one from Thermotoga maritima at 3.85 A˚ resolution all of the active site [1,2]; near atomic resolution struc- [10] and the other from Bacillus stearothermophilus at tures of the Escherichia coli [3] and Thermus thermophilus 3.3 A˚ resolution [11]. Both ribozyme structures were www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2007, 17:1–7 Please cite this article in press as: Scott WG, Ribozymes, Curr Opin Struct Biol (2007), doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2007.05.003 COSTBI-455; NO OF PAGES 7 2 Nucleic acids obtained in the absence of bound substrate and protein eral insertions that are characteristic of phage introns form non-catalytic subunit, so active site interactions between a ring that completely envelops the active site (Figure 2a). enzyme and substrate can only be inferred. The B. stearothermophilus fold is depicted in Figure 1. A model A Diels–Alderase ribozyme for the structure of eukaryotic RNase P has also been Possibly every crystallographer’s favorite reaction from proposed based on these crystal structures [12]. organic chemistry is the Diels–Alder reaction, as it reveals how orbital symmetry dictates reactivity between a diene Group I intron and a dienophile. Proteins and RNAs have both been The group I intron was the first catalytic RNA discovered evolved in vitro that enzymatically catalyze this reaction. [13] and, in 1986, it was demonstrated to be a true enzyme It is remarkable that RNA, originally thought to be [14]. Four group I intron crystal structures are now incapable of enzymatic catalysis and then thought to available, two of which fall into the current review period. catalyze primarily phosphodiester reactions, is capable Following publication of the Azoarcus [15] and Tetrahy- of catalyzing carbon–carbon bond formation. The protein mena [16] group I intron ribozyme structures in 2004, two Diels–Alderase is a catalytic antibody whose structure is particularly noteworthy structures have appeared. In Jan- known. We now have the structure of a Diels–Alder uary 2005, the structure of a phage Twort group I ribo- ribozyme in both the unbound and enzyme–product zyme–product complex [17] appeared (Figure 2a), complex states (Figure 3a), revealing that the ribozyme followed in September by a second structure of the uses a combination of proximity, spatial complementarity Azoarcus group I intron ribozyme [7], which revealed and electronic effects (Figure 3b) to activate stereoselec- evidence of a two-metal-ion mechanism in ribozyme tive catalysis, reminiscent of the protein Diels–Alderase catalysis (Figure 2b,c). [19]. The folds of the various group I introns are quite similar The glmS ribozyme [18], permitting comparisons between molecular species. The glmS ribozyme is a recently discovered ribozyme that The first Azoarcus structure was in a pre-catalytic state, in is unique in the world of naturally occurring ribozymes in which both exons (the substrate of the reaction in which two respects. First, it is a ribozyme that is also a ribos- adjacent exons are spliced as the intron excises itself) witch. Second, the regulatory effector of the ribozyme, were present. The Tetrahymena group I intron structure glucosamine-6-phosphate (GlcN6P), is actually a func- represents a state in which the 30-terminal v-guanosine tional group that binds to the ribozyme active site and and a metal ion are present in the active site. The newer participates in the acid-base catalysis of RNA self-clea- structures complement these two states with an enzyme– vage. The glmS ribozyme is derived from a self-cleaving product complex, and a complex in which all substrate, RNA sequence found in the 50-untranslated region (50- ribozyme functional groups and predicted metal ions are UTR) of the glmS message; it cleaves itself, inactivating present in the active site. These are observed as a cluster the message, when the cofactor GlcN6P binds. GlcN6P of two metal ions, each of which is coordinated to no less production is thus regulated in many Gram-positive bac- than five phosphate or ribose oxygens in the active site. teria via this ribozyme-mediated negative-feedback The Twort ribozyme in addition reveals how the periph- mechanism. Figure 1 Stereo view of the fold of the RNase P RNA, as determined from B. stearothermophilus. The 50 end of the molecule is in blue and the 30 end is in red. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2007, 17:1–7 www.sciencedirect.com Please cite this article in press as: Scott WG, Ribozymes, Curr Opin Struct Biol (2007), doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2007.05.003 COSTBI-455; NO OF PAGES 7 Ribozymes Scott 3 Figure 2 Group I intron structures. (a) Cartoon representation of the fold of the Twort group I intron. The 50 end is dark blue and the 30 end is red. Several observed Mg2+ ions are depicted as grey spheres. (b) The previously reported Azoarcus group I intron structure (grey cartoon) shares many structural features with the Twort group I intron. The new Azoarcus structure reveals interactions between two Mg2+ ions (cyan) at the active site and the 50 end of the 30 intron (blue), the 30 end of the 50 intron (red) and the v-guanosine cofactor (green).
Recommended publications
  • Biophysical and Biochemical Investigations of RNA Catalysis in the Hammerhead Ribozyme
    UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Previously Published Works Title Biophysical and biochemical investigations of RNA catalysis in the hammerhead ribozyme. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/366835vs Journal Quarterly reviews of biophysics, 32(3) ISSN 0033-5835 Author Scott, WG Publication Date 1999-08-01 DOI 10.1017/s003358350000353x Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 32, 3 (1999), pp. 241–284 Printed in the United Kingdom 241 # 1999 Cambridge University Press Biophysical and biochemical investigations of RNA catalysis in the hammerhead ribozyme William G. Scott The Center for the Molecular Biology of RNA and the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Sinsheimer Laboratories, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA 1. How do ribozymes work? 241 2. The hammerhead RNA as a prototype ribozyme 242 2.1 RNA enzymes 242 2.2 Satellite self-cleaving RNAs 242 2.3 Hammerhead RNAs and hammerhead ribozymes 244 3. The chemical mechanism of hammerhead RNA self-cleavage 246 3.1 Phosphodiester isomerization via an SN2(P) reaction 247 3.2 The canonical role of divalent metal ions in the hammerhead ribozyme reaction 251 3.3 The hammerhead ribozyme does not actually require metal ions for catalysis 254 3.4 Hammerhead RNA enzyme kinetics 257 4. Sequence requirements for hammerhead RNA self-cleavage 260 4.1 The conserved core, mutagenesis and functional group modifications 260 4.2 Ground-state vs. transition-state effects 261
    [Show full text]
  • How Might a Pre-Biotic Ribozyme Catalyze RNA Assembly in an RNA World?
    Science Highlight – April 2007 How Might a Pre-biotic Ribozyme Catalyze RNA Assembly in an RNA World? Which came first, nucleic acids or proteins? This question is molecular biology's version of the "chicken-or-the-egg" riddle. Genes made of nucleic acids (DNA or RNA) contain the instructions for making proteins, but enzymes made of proteins are needed to replicate genes. For those who try to understand how life origi- nated, this once seemed an intractable paradox. The discovery 25 years ago that RNA can be enzymatic permits us to speculate that pre-biotic self-replicating molecules may have been RNAs (1,2). This is known as the "RNA World" hypothesis, and with the discovery of RNA catalysis, it is now possible to imagine a prebiotic The L1 Ligase ribozyme at the moment 'RNA World' (or even one populated by early life forms) of bond creation. in which self-replicating ribozymes (RNA-based enzymes that possess the catalytic ability to copy themselves) accomplished both tasks, thus avoiding the potential “chicken-or-the-egg” conundrum (3). But there's a catch. In order to copy RNA, fragments or monomers that have 5'-triphosphates must be ligated together. This is true for modern polymerases, and is also the most likely mechanism by which a ribozyme self-replicase in an RNA World might function. Yet no one has found a modern natural ribozyme that catalyze this The RNA nucleotide triphosphate ligation reaction required reaction (pictured right). for RNA polymerization and self-replication. RNA in vitro evolution and selection has however enabled several research groups to discover RNA sequences that can in fact cata- lyze the required chemical reaction (shown above) for 5'-triphos- phate RNA fragment ligation, and one group has even produced a primitive but functional RNA-based RNA polymerase ribozyme (4).
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetic Characterization of Ribozymes Directed Against the Cisplatin
    D2001 Nature Publishing Group 0929-1903/01/$17.00/+0 www.nature.com/cgt Kinetic characterization of ribozymes directed against the cisplatin resistance±associated ABC transporter cMOAT/MRP2/ABCC2 Verena Materna, Per Sonne Holm, Manfred Dietel, and Hermann Lage Institute of Pathology, Charite Campus Mitte, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin D-10117, Germany. The enhanced expression of the human ABC transporter, cMOAT (MRP2/ABCC2), is associated with resistance of tumor cells against platinum-containing compounds, such as cisplatin. Therefore, cMOAT represents an interesting candidate factor for modulation of antineoplastic drug resistance. Two different hammerhead ribozymes, which exhibit high catalytic cleavage activities towards specific RNA sequences encoding cMOAT, were designed. Cleavage sites of these ribozymes are the GUC sites in codons 704 and 708 of the open readingframe in the cMOAT-specific mRNA molecule. Hammerhead ribozymes were in vitro synthesized using bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase and oligonucleotide primers whereby one primer contains a T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequence. cMOAT-encodingsubstrate RNA molecules were created by a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction usingRNA prepared from the cisplatin-resistant human ovarian carcinoma cell line A2780RCIS overexpressingthe cMOAT-encoding transcript. In a cell-free system, both anti-cMOAT ribozymes cleaved their substrate in a highly efficient manner at a physiologic pH and temperature. The cleavage reaction was dependent on time and ribozyme:substrate ratio for determining specific kinetic parameters. Cancer Gene Therapy (2001) 8, 176±184 Key words: cMOAT; MRP2; ABCC2; ribozyme; drug resistance; cisplatin. cquirement of resistance to antineoplastic agents, at of a broad range of endogenous and xenobiotic compounds Aconcentrations which were once effective for cancer across the apical canalicular membrane of the hepatocyte.4 chemotherapy, is a major obstacle in the clinical treatment Mutations in the cMOAT-encoding gene were shown to of human malignancies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tetracycline-Dependent Ribozyme Switch Allows Conditional Induction of Gene Expression in Caenorhabditis Elegans
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08412-w OPEN A tetracycline-dependent ribozyme switch allows conditional induction of gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans Lena A. Wurmthaler1,2, Monika Sack1,2, Karina Gense2,3, Jörg S. Hartig1,2 & Martin Gamerdinger2,3 The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans represents an important research model. Convenient methods for conditional induction of gene expression in this organism are not available. Here 1234567890():,; we describe tetracycline-dependent ribozymes as versatile RNA-based genetic switches in C. elegans. Ribozyme insertion into the 3’-UTR converts any gene of interest into a tetracycline- inducible gene allowing temporal and, by using tissue-selective promoters, spatial control of expression in all developmental stages of the worm. Using the ribozyme switches we established inducible C. elegans polyglutamine Huntington’s disease models exhibiting ligand- controlled polyQ-huntingtin expression, inclusion body formation, and toxicity. Our approach circumvents the complicated expression of regulatory proteins. Moreover, only little coding space is necessary and natural promoters can be utilized. With these advantages tetracycline-dependent ribozymes significantly expand the genetic toolbox for C. elegans. 1 Department of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. 2 Konstanz Research School Chemical Biology (KoRS-CB), University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. 3 Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.S.H. (email: [email protected]) or to M.G. (email: [email protected]) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2019) 10:491 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08412-w | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08412-w nducible regulatory systems are very powerful research tools to single A-to-G point mutation in the catalytic core of the HHR9 Iinvestigate the cellular function of individual genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2016 Is Available in the Laboratory of Dr
    RNA Society Newsletter Aug 2016 From the Desk of the President, Sarah Woodson Greetings to all! I always enjoy attending the annual meetings of the RNA Society, but this year’s meeting in Kyoto was a standout in my opinion. This marked the second time that the RNA meeting has been held in Kyoto as a joint meeting with the RNA Society of Japan. (The first time was in 2011). Particular thanks go to the local organizers Mikiko Siomi and Tom Suzuki who took care of many logistical details, and to all of the organizers, Mikiko, Tom, Utz Fischer, Wendy Gilbert, David Lilley and Erik Sontheimer, for putting together a truly exciting and stimulating scientific program. Of course, the real excitement in the annual RNA meetings comes from all of you who give the talks and present the posters. I always enjoy meeting old friends and colleagues, but the many new participants in this year’s meeting particularly encouraged me. (Continued on p2) In this issue : Desk of the President, Sarah Woodson 1 Highlights of RNA 2016 : Kyoto Japan 4 Annual Society Award Winners 4 Jr Scientist activities 9 Mentor Mentee Lunch 10 New initiatives 12 Desk of our CEO, James McSwiggen 15 New Volunteer Opportunities 16 Chair, Meetings Committee, Benoit Chabot 17 Desk of the Membership Chair, Kristian Baker 18 Thank you Volunteers! 20 Meeting Reports: RNA Sponsored Meetings 22 Upcoming Meetings of Interest 27 Employment 31 1 Although the graceful city of Kyoto and its cultural months. First, in May 2016, the RNA journal treasures beckoned from just beyond the convention instituted a uniform price for manuscript publication hall, the meeting itself held more than enough (see p 12) that simplifies the calculation of author excitement to keep ones attention! Both the quality fees and facilitates the use of color figures to and the “polish” of the scientific presentations were convey scientific information.
    [Show full text]
  • Hammerhead Ribozymes Against Virus and Viroid Rnas
    Hammerhead Ribozymes Against Virus and Viroid RNAs Alberto Carbonell, Ricardo Flores, and Selma Gago Contents 1 A Historical Overview: Hammerhead Ribozymes in Their Natural Context ................................................................... 412 2 Manipulating Cis-Acting Hammerheads to Act in Trans ................................. 414 3 A Critical Issue: Colocalization of Ribozyme and Substrate . .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. 416 4 An Unanticipated Participant: Interactions Between Peripheral Loops of Natural Hammerheads Greatly Increase Their Self-Cleavage Activity ........................... 417 5 A New Generation of Trans-Acting Hammerheads Operating In Vitro and In Vivo at Physiological Concentrations of Magnesium . ...... 419 6 Trans-Cleavage In Vitro of Short RNA Substrates by Discontinuous and Extended Hammerheads ........................................... 420 7 Trans-Cleavage In Vitro of a Highly Structured RNA by Discontinuous and Extended Hammerheads ........................................... 421 8 Trans-Cleavage In Vivo of a Viroid RNA by an Extended PLMVd-Derived Hammerhead ........................................... 422 9 Concluding Remarks and Outlooks ........................................................ 424 References ....................................................................................... 425 Abstract The hammerhead ribozyme, a small catalytic motif that promotes self- cleavage of the RNAs in which it is found naturally embedded, can be manipulated to recognize and cleave specifically
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Simplicity and Mechanistic Complexity in the Hammerhead Ribozyme
    CHAPTER SEVEN Structural Simplicity and Mechanistic Complexity in the Hammerhead Ribozyme Sara M. O’Rourke, William G. Scott1 The Center for the Molecular Biology of RNA, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States 1Corresponding author: e-mail address: [email protected] Contents 1. Background and Structural Overview 178 2. Fast Minimal Hammerhead Ribozymes 181 3. Acid-Base Catalysis and the Hammerhead Ribozyme 182 4. Is the Hammerhead Ligation Reaction the Reverse of the Cleavage Reaction? 191 5. Do Cooperative Interactions in the Hammerhead Ribozyme Facilitate General Base Catalysis in the Cleavage Reaction? 194 6. Summary and Concluding Remarks 195 6.1 The Structure of the Hammerhead Ribozyme May Be Much Simpler Than We Have Thought 196 6.2 The Mechanism of the Hammerhead Ribozyme May Be Much More Complicated Than We Have Thought 196 6.3 Concluding Remarks 200 References 201 Abstract Natural or full-length hammerhead ribozymes are up to 1000-fold more active than their minimal counterparts that lack a complex tertiary interaction that pre-organizes and stabilizes the ribozyme active site, positioning RNA functional groups to facilitate acid-base catalysis. The recent discovery that a single tertiary contact (an AU Hoogsteen pair) between Stems I and II confers essentially all of the enhanced activity greatly simplifies our understanding of the structural requirements for hammerhead ribozyme activity. In contrast, the simplest mechanistic interpretations are challenged with the presentation of more complex alternatives. These alternatives are elucidated and criti- cally analyzed in the context of several of the active hammerhead ribozyme structures now available. # Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, Volume 159 2018 Elsevier Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Deciphering the Reading of the Genetic Code by Near-Cognate Trna
    Deciphering the reading of the genetic code by near-cognate tRNA Sandra Blancheta,1, David Cornua, Isabelle Hatina, Henri Grosjeana, Pierre Bertina, and Olivier Namya,2 aInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Commissariat à l‘énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, CNRS, Université Paris‐Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198 Gif‐sur‐Yvette cedex, France Edited by Ada Yonath, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel, and approved February 11, 2018 (received for review September 3, 2017) Some codons of the genetic code can be read not only by cognate, has been suggested that the combination of 5-methylene deriv- but also by near-cognate tRNAs. This flexibility is thought to be atives and 2-thiolation modifications of U34 restrict the decoding conferred mainly by a mismatch between the third base of the of codons ending with A (9, 10); moreover, 2-thiolation increases codon and the first of the anticodon (the so-called “wobble” po- affinity of binding to the cognate codon and reduces tRNA re- sition). However, this simplistic explanation underestimates the jection (11). These modifications have also been implicated in importance of nucleotide modifications in the decoding process. protein homeostasis (12), in reading-frame maintenance (13), Using a system in which only near-cognate tRNAs can decode a and in the enhancement of recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA specific codon, we investigated the role of six modifications of the synthetases (14). anticodon, or adjacent nucleotides, of the tRNAs specific for Tyr, However, data are not easily transposable from one organism Gln, Lys, Trp, Cys, and Arg in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    [Show full text]
  • Ribozymes Targeted to the Mitochondria Using the 5S Ribosomal Rna
    RIBOZYMES TARGETED TO THE MITOCHONDRIA USING THE 5S RIBOSOMAL RNA By JENNIFER ANN BONGORNO A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 Copyright 2005 by Jennifer Bongorno To my grandmother, Hazel Traster Miller, whose interest in genealogy sparked my interest in genetics, and without whose mitochondria I would not be here ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank all the members of the Lewin lab; especially my mentor, Al Lewin. Al was always there for me with suggestions and keeping me motivated. He and the other members of the lab were like my second family; I would not have had an enjoyable experience without them. Diana Levinson and Elizabeth Bongorno worked with me on the fourth and third mouse transfections respectively. Joe Hartwich and Al Lewin tested some of the ribozymes in vitro and cloned some of the constructs I used. James Thomas also helped with cloning and was an invaluable lab manager. Verline Justilien worked on a related project and was a productive person with whom to bounce ideas back and forth. Lourdes Andino taught me how to use the new phosphorimager for my SYBR Green-stained gels. Alan White was there through it all, like the older brother I never had. Mary Ann Checkley was with me even longer than Alan, since we both came to Florida from Ohio Wesleyan, although she did manage to graduate before me. Jia Liu and Frederic Manfredsson were there when I needed a beer.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Code14
    Centre culturel Saint Thomas, Strasbourg Conference PROGRAM Thursday, March 26 13:00 - 14:00 Arrival and Welcome coffee 14:00 - 14:15 Congress opening - Welcome address from the organizers Session 1: Ribosome Structures and Decoding Chair: Jean-Paul Renaud (Strasbourg, France) 14:15 - 14:45 Marina Rodnina (Göttingen, Germany) - The EMBO Keynote Lecture Decoding and recoding of genetic information by the ribosome 14:45 - 15:15 Daniel Wilson (Hamburg, Germany) Rescue of ribosomes trapped on mRNAs without a stop codon 15:15 - 15:45 Eric Westhof (Strasbourg, France) tRNA modifications in decoding: how to choose between two constraints 15:45 - 16:15 Coffee break 16:15 - 16:30 Talk 1 selected from abstracts 16:30 - 16:45 Talk 2 selected from abstracts 16:45 -17:00 Talk 3 selected from abstracts 17:00 -17:15 Talk 4 selected from abstracts 17:15 - 17:45 Sebastian Leidel (Bern, Switzerland) Tuning translation by (RNA) modifications 17:45 - 18:15 Orna Dahan (Rehovot, Israel) An interplay between the tRNA and mRNA pools affect translation efficiency and accuracy 1 18:30 Dinner 20:00 - 20:30 Young scientist session Chair: Bojan Zagrovic (Vienna, Austria) Echoes from the past: RNA-protein interactions and the structure of the genetic code 20:30 - 20:45 Talk 5 selected from abstracts 20:45 – 21:00 Talk 6 selected from abstracts 21:00 - 23:00 Poster session Friday, March 27 Session 2: Translational Variations and Miscoding Chair: Pascale Romby (Strasbourg, France) 9:00 - 9:30 Zoya Ignatova (Hamburg, Germany)– The French-German University (UFA) Keynote
    [Show full text]
  • The Annotation of RNA Motifs
    Comparative and Functional Genomics Comp Funct Genom 2002; 3: 518–524. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/cfg.213 Conference Review The annotation of RNA motifs Neocles B. Leontis1* and Eric Westhof2** 1 Chemistry Department and Center for Biomolecular Sciences, Overman Hall, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA 2 Institut de Biologie Moleculaire´ et Cellulaire du CNRS, Modelisation´ et Simulations des Acides Nucleiques,´ UPR 9002, 15 rue Rene´ Descartes, F-67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France Correspondence to either: Abstract *Neocles B. Leontis, Chemistry The recent deluge of new RNA structures, including complete atomic-resolution views Department and Center for of both subunits of the ribosome, has on the one hand literally overwhelmed our Biomolecular Sciences, Overman individual abilities to comprehend the diversity of RNA structure, and on the other Hall, Bowling Green State hand presented us with new opportunities for comprehensive use of RNA sequences University, Bowling Green, OH for comparative genetic, evolutionary and phylogenetic studies. Two concepts are key 43403, USA. to understanding RNA structure: hierarchical organization of global structure and E-mail: [email protected] isostericity of local interactions. Global structure changes extremely slowly, as it relies or on conserved long-range tertiary interactions. Tertiary RNA–RNA and quaternary RNA–protein interactions are mediated by RNA motifs, defined as recurrent and **Eric Westhof, Institute de ordered arrays of non-Watson–Crick base-pairs. A single RNA motif comprises a Biologie Moleculaire´ et Cellulaire family of sequences, all of which can fold into the same three-dimensional structure du CNRS, Modelisation´ et and can mediate the same interaction(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Intronic Hammerhead Ribozymes in Mrna Biogenesis
    DOI 10.1515/hsz-2012-0223 Biol. Chem. 2012; 393(11):1317–1326 Review Inmaculada Garc í a-Robles, Jes ú s S á nchez-Navarro and Marcos de la Pe ñ a * Intronic hammerhead ribozymes in mRNA biogenesis Abstract: Small self-cleaving ribozymes are a group of self-cleavage reaction (Ferre -D ’ Amare and Scott, 2010 ). natural RNAs that are capable of catalyzing their own The HHR is made up of three double helices (helix I to III) and sequence-specific endonucleolytic cleavage. One of that intersect at a three-way junction containing the cata- the most studied members is the hammerhead ribozyme lytic core of 15 highly conserved nucleotides (Figure 1 ). (HHR), a catalytic RNA originally discovered in subviral Originally described as a hammerhead-like fold because plant pathogens but recently shown to reside in a myriad of its predicted secondary structure, the motif actu- of genomes along the tree of life. In eukaryotes, most of ally adopts in solution a ‘ Y ’ -shaped fold, where helix III the genomic HHRs seem to be related to short interspersed coaxially stacks with helix II, and helix I is parallel to the retroelements, with the main exception of a group of strik- coaxial stack interacting with helix II through tertiary ingly conserved ribozymes found in the genomes of all interactions required for efficient self-cleavage in vivo amniotes (reptiles, birds and mammals). These amniota (De la Pe ñ a et al., 2003 ; Khvorova et al. , 2003 ; Martick HHRs occur in the introns of a few specific genes, and and Scott , 2006 : Chi et al.
    [Show full text]