DOCSLIB.ORG

Urn:Nbn:Nl:Ui:10-1874-211177

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS AND EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONALISM: ACCOUNTABILITY BEYOND BORDERS National Parliaments and European Constitutionalism: Accountability Beyond Borders (with a summary in English) Nationale parlementen en Europees constitutionalisme: politieke verantwoordelijkheid voorbij grenzen (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 11 oktober 2011 des ochtends te 10.30 uur door Davor Jančić geboren op 12 maart 1982 te Novi Sad, Servië Promotor: Prof. dr. L. Besselink Assessment committee: Prof. dr. S. Weatherill (Oxford University) Prof. dr. R. Dehousse (Sciences Po Paris) Prof. dr. F. de Quadros (University of Lisbon) Prof. dr. D. Curtin (University of Amsterdam and Utrecht University) Prof. dr. H. Kummeling (Utrecht University) (Chairman) Acknowledgments The past four years have been a tremendous academic experience that would not have been the same without the generous help of many people. More than anyone else, my supervisor Professor Leonard Besselink was an incessant source of intellectual inspiration and leadership. He unselfishly supported each of the steps in my life as a doctoral student. I will always be immensely grateful to him for believing in me and for giving me the chance to learn not only about law and politics but also about the research world in general. Leonard was always there for me, be it regular personal meetings, e-mail discussions or Skype calls during summer breaks. He also took care about my social life and personal well-being, which meant a whole lot to me. In a less direct but no less important way, Professors Rob Widdershoven, Henk Kummeling and Ben Schueler have been associated with my PhD and I thank them wholeheartedly for their support. The atmosphere at Achter Sint Pieter 200 in Utrecht was always extremely pleasant. I thank all of my dear colleagues for making me feel at home and accepting me as one of them. Above all, I thank my fellow PhD students – Jasper, Peter, Daan, Brecht, Alberto, Haak, Anoeska, Melissa, Loes, Margot, Milan and Bettina – for being awesome colleagues and friends. I also thank Frieda, Corrie, Miranda, Vanessa, Inge and Cathelijne for their prompt administrative support. I wish to praise the Utrecht Law Library personnel for their swift services and excellent cooperation. The couple without whom my PhD life would have been much more ascetic are Jan and Louise from the canteen. I thank them for giving in to my constant requests for fried chicken and chicken soup, which have given me the energy to persist in my research efforts. My thanks also go to my comrades outside the research milieu, Nima and Swen, my true friends. Due to the comparative nature of my PhD project, it was highly beneficial for me to become acquainted with the English, French and Portuguese literature. For this reason, I was fortunate enough to spend research periods at Sciences Po Paris, the London School of Economics and the University of Lisbon. Each of these stays left a specific mark on my thinking and enriched my thesis. This would not have been possible without the kind assistance, collegiality and academic support of Professors Renaud Dehousse and Fausto de Quadros as well as Dr Jo Murkens. I am indebted to Utrecht University’s G.J. Wiarda Institute for Legal Research for providing financial assistance for my stay in London. It has been a great honour for me to have an international reading committee. I am truly grateful to Professors Stephen Weatherill, Renaud Dehousse, Fausto de Quadros, Deirdre Curtin and Henk Kummeling for taking their precious summer time to read and assess my manuscript. I am also grateful to Professor Mark Bovens, Dr Madalina Busuioc, Dr Gijs Jan Brandsma and Dr Marianne van de Steeg for several informal meetings at which we i Acknowledgments discussed each other’s writings. I have also profited from constructive comments by Professor Beate Kohler-Koch and Dr Ben Crum. All these discussions were invaluable in getting a perspective from political science. For her limitless support and encouragement, I am obliged to Professor Marjoleine Zieck, a colleague and friend who occupies a very special place in my life and to whom I owe much of what I have so far achieved in my academic career. The person whom I wish to single out especially is Lívia Freitas de Lima. The very structure of my dissertation was born when I tried to explain to her what my job was about. She was my emotional backbone, my ultimate source of energy, strength, stability and tranquility, my fount of joy and happiness. Lívia, obrigado por tudo. Last but not least, I thank my dear family – my mother Olga, my father Vlasta and my sister Lana – for being with me each and every day, for bearing my complaints, for helping me solve my dilemmas, for giving me sincere advice, for giving me the love and care, and for enabling me to be where I am now. I devote this dissertation to the three of you. ii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS i CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY TRANSCENDING NATIONAL BORDERS 1 1. FRAMING THE STUDY: WHOSE ARE OUR NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS? 1 1.1. Topic 1 1.2. Objectives and added value 2 2. LITERATURE OVERVIEW: TOWARDS A QUALITATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS 3 2.1. The pre-Maastricht placidity: adjusting the lens 3 2.2. The Maastricht frenzy: parliamentary decline diagnosis 4 2.3. The post-Maastricht avalanche: scrutiny as a democracy fix 6 3. STRUCTURE: SUBSTANTIVE PARLIAMENTARY FUNCTIONS IN FOCUS 9 4. METHODOLOGY: LEGAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS COMBINED 12 CHAPTER 2 PARLIAMENTARY INTERDEPENDENCE: CONCEPTUALISING THE RELATIONS BETWEEN NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS AND EU INSTITUTIONS 15 1. IN SEARCH OF A THEORETICO-METHODOLOGICAL DEVICE 15 2. INTERDEPENDENCE AND EU GOVERNANCE 16 3. INTERDEPENDENCE AND EU CONSTITUTIONALISM 18 3.1. Federalism 19 3.2. Constitutional pluralism 21 3.3. Multilevel constitutionalism 22 3.4. Composite constitutionalism 24 3.5. Synthetic constitutionalism 26 3.6. Multilevel parliamentary field 26 4. THE CONCEPT OF PARLIAMENTARY INTERDEPENDENCE 27 4.1. Parliamentary role perceptions 27 4.2. Rationale behind parliamentary interdependence 28 4.3. Definition and added value of the concept 31 PART I – CONDITIONS THE LOST AND FOUND OF EUROPE'S DEMOCRACY 1. VISIONS OF A UNITED EUROPE: A PRELUDE 37 2. METHOD 39 2.1. Questions 39 iii Table of Contents 2.2. Case studies selection 39 3. ARGUMENT AND STRUCTURE 42 CHAPTER 3 OVERTURE THE COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY: THE NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS' EUROPEAN YOUTH 43 1. THE BIRTH OF THE FIRST EUROPEAN COMMUNITY: A HUMBLE BEGINNING 43 2. THE PREROGATIVES OF THE FLEDGLING COMMON ASSEMBLY 46 3. THE NATURE OF THE DOUBLE MANDATE: POSITIVE BUT UNSUSTAINABLE? 49 3.1. The High Authority as the Community's powerhouse 49 3.2. National parliaments as archetypal repositories of popular representation 50 4. THE COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY TREATY IN NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS 55 4.1. France: sowing the germ of supranational parliamentarism 55 4.2. Britain: strategic abstention 57 4.3. Portugal: obstructed by dictatorship 61 5. CONCLUDING REMARKS 62 CHAPTER 4 INTERMEZZO THE MAASTRICHT TREATY: PARLIAMENTS BECKONED TO THE UNION 65 1. EXPLORING INTERPARLIAMENTARISM ACROSS LEVELS 65 2. CHALLENGING NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS THROUGH TREATY REFORM 68 2.1. The parliaments' comeback in the Treaties and in practice 68 2.1.1. Declarations on national parliaments 68 2.1.2. The Assizes: a failed experiment 69 2.1.3. COSAC: a success story 70 2.2. Codecision: empowering the national parliaments' counterpart 71 2.3. Wading into intergovernmentalism 72 2.4. Consecrating a principled organisation of EU competences 72 3. THE MAASTRICHT TREATY IN NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS 73 3.1. France 73 3.1.1. Constitutionality 74 3.1.2. Codecision 76 3.1.3. Integovernmentalism 78 3.1.4. Subsidiarity 79 3.2. Britain 81 3.2.1. Codecision 82 3.2.2. Intergovernmentalism 84 3.2.3. Subsidiarity 87 3.3. Portugal 87 3.3.1. Codecision 88 iv Table of Contents 3.3.2. Intergovernmentalism 91 3.3.3. Subsidiarity 91 4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 92 CHAPTER 5 FINALE THE LISBON TREATY: NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS ANCHORED IN THE UNION 95 1. CALIBRATING INTERPARLIAMENTARISM ACROSS LEVELS 95 2. THE POWERS OF NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS UNDER THE LISBON TREATY 97 3. GENERIC EUROPEAN FUNCTIONS OF NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS 100 3.1. Good functioning of the Union 100 3.2. Democratic principles of the Union 101 4. SUBSIDIARITY GUARDIANSHIP 102 4.1. Early warning mechanism 102 4.1.1. Scope and method of application 102 4.1.2. Procedural aspects 103 4.1.3. Constitutional value 107 4.2. Late warning mechanism 109 4.3. The Barroso initiative 110 4.3.1. Origins, definition and characteristics 110 4.3.2. Modes of national parliamentary participation 112 A. Differences 112 B. Similarities 113 4.3.3. Effects 113 5. THE LISBON TREATY IN NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS 115 5.1. FRANCE 116 5.1.1. Constitutionality 116 5.1.2. Subsidiarity 119 5.1.3. Good functioning of the Union 122 5.1.4. Extension of codecision 123 5.2. BRITAIN 125 5.2.1. Subsidiarity 126 5.2.2. Good functioning of the Union 130 5.2.3. Extension of codecision 131 5.3. PORTUGAL 136 5.3.1. Subsidiarity 137 5.3.2. Good functioning of the Union 138 5.3.3. Extension of codecision 140 6. CONCLUDING REMARKS 141 v Table of Contents PART II – COMPETENCES EUROPEAN SCRUTINY AFTER LISBON: LOCKED AND LOADED 1. OBJECTIVES 147 2. METHOD 148 2.1. Area of Freedom, Security and Justice 149 2.1.1.
Recommended publications
  • 'UK-USA Mutual Defence Agreement'. House Of

    'UK-USA Mutual Defence Agreement'. House Of

    UK-USA Mutual Defence Agreement Standard Note: SN/IA/3147 Last updated: 30 July 2004 Author: Paul Bowers International Affairs and Defence Section The Agreement between the UK and the USA for Cooperation in the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defence Purposes 1958, also known as the Mutual Defence Agreement (MDA), allows the USA and the UK to exchange nuclear materials, technology and information. It was the result of an amendment to post-War US non-proliferation law, which exempted allies that had made substantial progress in developing nuclear weapons from the general ban on exchanges that might lead to nuclear proliferation. The most important part of the MDA is time limited, and it is due to expire at the end of 2004. The UK and the USA have signed a new treaty to extend this deadline to 2014. This treaty must be ratified by both states. Critics argue that the MDA as amended contravenes the parties’ obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons 1968 (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, or NPT). Further information on the NPT is in SN/IA/491, Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 23 March 2004, at: http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk/notes/iads/snia-00491.pdf The procedure in the USA allows Congress an opportunity to veto the ratification. No such opportunity exists in the UK. This Note describes the MDA, its history, the current amending treaty, the procedures surrounding ratification of that treaty, and the concerns over its relationship with the NPT. Contents A. MDA 3 B.
  • N° 290 Nov / Décembre 2004 N° 290

    N° 290 Nov / Décembre 2004 N° 290

    N° 290 Nov / Décembre 2004 N° 290 LES CABINETS MINISTERIELS 4, allée des Noisetiers - 95670 MARLY-la-VILLE LES CABINETS Tél. : 01 34 68 85 69 • Fax : 01 34 68 85 69 MINISTERIELS Fondateur : Pierre DARIUS (1945) Direction générale : Annick DESSAL Abonnement annuel TTC : 37 Euros (Parution trimestrielle) C.C.P. Paris: 23.964.55 Y C.C.P. Paris : 19.118.21 X M. Jacques CHIRAC Président de la République SIRET: 381 709 211 00027 R.C.S. Pontoise: A 381 709 211 5ème Gouvernement de M. Jean-Pierre RAFFARIN A.P.E. : 221E 1ère ÉDITION Liste arrêtée le 12 Décembre 2004 Dépôt Légal Janvier 2004 LES CABINETS MINISTÉRIELS Imprimeur: Imprimerie de Chabrol 4, allée des Noisetiers - 95670 MARLY-la-VILLE Tél. : 01 34 68 85 69 • Fax : 01 34 68 85 69 189, rue d’Aubervilliers - 75886 PARIS Cedex 18 64 - DROITS DE REPRODUCTION RÉSERVÉS - 01 Ministre des Affaires Est délégué auprès du Ministre : Étrangères : Secrétaire d’État à la Réforme SOMMAIRE M. Michel BARNIER p. 21 Présidence de la République : Ministre Déléguée à de l’État : Sont délégués auprès du Ministre M. Éric WOERTH p. 53 M. Jacques CHIRAC p. 4-5 l’Intégration, à l’Égalité des Chances et à la Lutte contre Ministre déléguée aux Ministre de l’Agriculture de Sénat : l’Exclusion : Affaires Européennes : l’Alimentation, de la Pêche et M. Christian PONCELET p. 6-7 Mme Claudie HAIGNERÉ p. 44 Mme Nelly OLIN p. 36 de la Ruralité : Assemblée Nationale : Ministre délégué à la Coopé- M. Dominique BUSSEREAU p. 25 M. Jean-Louis DEBRÉ p.
  • Redressing the Democratic Deficit in Treaty Law Making: (Re-)Establishing a Role for Parliament

    Redressing the Democratic Deficit in Treaty Law Making: (Re-)Establishing a Role for Parliament

    Redressing the Democratic Deficit in Treaty Law Making: (Re-)Establishing a Role for Parliament Joanna Harrington* Treaties are a significant source of law on a wide Les traités sont une importante source de droit dans range of subjects, but traditionally do not become domestic bien des domaines, mais ne s’intègrent traditionnellement law without national implementation. Nevertheless, the pas au système juridique intérieur sans une mise en œuvre legal character of treaty rules does place pressure on a nationale. Quoi qu’il en soit, le caractère juridique des state’s domestic institutions to ensure compliance. Given règles issues d’un traité exerce une certaine pression sur les the influence of treaty law, several Commonwealth states institutions nationales afin d’en assurer le respect. Étant provide a role for Parliament in treaty making even though donné l’influence du droit des traités, plusieurs états du at common law, the decision to make a treaty clearly rests Commonwealth accordent au Parlement un rôle dans with a government’s executive branch. Such reforms to the l’élaboration des traités, même si d’après le droit commun, treaty-making process attempt to address complaints that a la décision de rédiger un traité appartient clairement à “democratic deficit” exists, including an additional “federal l’exécutif du gouvernement. De telles réformes du democratic deficit” in federal states arising from the processus d’élaboration des traités tentent de répondre aux absence of a requirement for consultation between the critiques suivant lesquelles il existe un «déficit central and regional bodies. A review of the experiences in démocratique», en plus d’un «déficit démocratique fédéral» Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia leads to dans des états fédéraux, issu de l’absence d’une obligation several suggested reforms to secure greater legislative de consultation entre l’état central et les gouvernements scrutiny, enhance public awareness, and improve locaux.
  • Parliament's Role in Ratifying Treaties

    Parliament's Role in Ratifying Treaties

    BRIEFING PAPER Number 5855, 20 January 2017 Parliament's role in By Arabella Lang ratifying treaties Contents: 1. The Government makes treaties 2. Parliament makes any implementing legislation 3. Parliament can object to ratification 4. No requirement for a debate or vote 5. Role of devolved executives and legislatures 6. Different rules for specific types of treaty 7. More parliamentary scrutiny of treaties? www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Parliament's role in ratifying treaties Contents Summary 3 1. The Government makes treaties 5 2. Parliament makes any implementing legislation 7 3. Parliament can object to ratification 8 3.1 Introduction 8 3.2 The Government must lay treaties before Parliament 8 3.3 The Commons can block ratification 9 3.4 Limits of the 2010 Act 9 4. No requirement for a debate or vote 10 5. Role of devolved executives and legislatures 12 6. Different rules for specific types of treaty 13 6.1 Exceptional cases 13 6.2 Memorandums of Understanding 13 6.3 EU Treaties 13 Treaties that amend the EU Treaties 13 EU external agreements 14 6.4 Double taxation agreements 14 7. More parliamentary scrutiny of treaties? 16 7.1 Introduction 16 7.2 Other countries 16 7.3 More debates and votes? 16 Affirmative resolution procedure 16 Other formal requirements for a debate 17 7.4 Before signature? 17 No formal role for Parliament before signature 17 Proposals 18 Cover page image copyright Click & browse to copyright info for stock image 3 Commons Library Briefing, 20 January 2017 Summary The Government makes treaties, but Parliament has a role Although the UK Government is responsible for negotiating, signing and ratifying international treaties, Parliament has a statutory role in ratifying them, and can also be involved in other ways.
  • Colombes Mag 041 - Septembre 2018.Indd 1 28/08/2018 18:02 Colombes Mag 041 - Septembre 2018.Indd 2 28/08/2018 18:02 La Photo Du Mois

    Colombes Mag 041 - Septembre 2018.Indd 1 28/08/2018 18:02 Colombes Mag 041 - Septembre 2018.Indd 2 28/08/2018 18:02 La Photo Du Mois

    .fr No 41 e mag LE MAGAZINE DES ACTUALITÉS SEPTEMBRE 2018 DE COLOMBES Dossier 39,2 millions d’euros pour l’éducation Colomboscope Hommage Journées européennes Dynamiques Dominique Frélaut du patrimoine les 15 et Forum des associations nous a quittés 16 septembre samedi 8 septembre colombes mag 041 - septembre 2018.indd 1 28/08/2018 18:02 colombes mag 041 - septembre 2018.indd 2 28/08/2018 18:02 La photo du mois Photo Arnaud de Beauregard UN TRIOMPHE EN BLEU, BLANC, ROUGE ! événement exceptionnel, mobilisation exceptionnelle ! Durant le mois de juillet, tout un pays a vibré pour l’Équipe de France à l’occasion de la Coupe du monde de football en Russie. Après des rencontres fantastiques face à l’Argentine, l’Uruguay et la ÀBelgique, les Bleus avaient rendez-vous le dimanche 15 juillet pour défier en finale la surprenante Croatie sur la pelouse du stade de Moscou. Pour retransmettre ce match historique et permettre aux Colombiens de partager en famille ou entre amis ce moment de fièvre sportive, la Ville a mobilisé effectifs et moyens afin de transformer la place Henri- Neveu en « fan zone » officielle. Écran géant, fanions tricolores, feutres de maquillage et bouteilles d’eau distribués au public à l’entrée… Tout était prêt pour une soirée mémorable ! Plus de 2 000 personnes ont assisté ce jour-là au sacre des Bleus. La rencontre, pleine de suspense et de rebondissements, a fait trembler à l’unisson des supporters de tous âges, qui ont laissé éclater leur joie au coup de sifflet final. Un triomphe auquel aura contribué en deuxième mi-temps le milieu de terrain Steven Nzonzi.
  • Biographie Nationale

    Biographie Nationale

    BIOGRAPHIE NATIONALE PUBLIÉE PAR L'ACADÉMIE ROYALE DES SCIENCES, DES LETTRES ET DES BEAUX-ARTS^ DE BELGIQUE TOME QUARANTE-ET-UNIÈME SUPPLÉMENT TOME XIII (FASCICULE 1") ABBELOOS — JOASSART BRUXELLES ÉTABLISSEMENTS EMILE BRUYLANT Société anonyme d'éditions juridiques et scientifiques RUE DE LA RÉGENCE, 67 I 1979 ι BIOGRAPHIE NATIONALE BIOGRAPHIE NATIONALE PUBLIÉE PAR L'ACADÉMIE ROYALE DES SCIENCES, DES LETTRES ET DES BEAUX-ARTS DE BELGIQUE TOME QUARANTE-ET-UNIÈME SUPPLÉMENT er TOME XIII (FASCICULE 1 ) ABBELOOS — JOASSART BRUXELLES ÉTABLISSEMENTS EMILE BRUYLANT Société anonyme d'éditions juridiques et scientifiques RUE DE LA RÉGENCE, 67 1979 Les opinions exprimées dans les notices n'engagent que leurs auteurs. A ABBELOOS (Jean-Baptiste), prê- dans la lutte scolaire qui a marqué tre du diocèse de Malines et orienta- l'histoire de notre pays à cette épo- liste, recteur de l'Université Catholi- que et devint, en 1883, vicaire géné- que de Louvain, né à Gooik le 15 jan- ral de l'archevêché de Malines. Nommé vier 1836, décédé à Louvain, le 25 fé- recteur de l'Université Catholique de vrier 1906. Louvain le 10 février 1887, il s'acquitta Issu de la bourgeoisie rurale du de cette tâche jusqu'à son éméritat Brabant flamand, il fut l'élève du c'est-à-dire jusqu'au 1er octobre 1898. Petit Séminaire, puis du Grand Sémi- Il faisait partie de la Société asiatique naire de Malines avant d'aller étudier de Paris. Il était prélat, avec le titre la théologie à Louvain puis à Rome. de protonotaire apostolique ad instar A l'Université de Louvain, il avait parlicipantium, et chanoine honoraire appris le syriaque avec J.-B.
  • Treaty-Making and the British Parliament -Europe

    Treaty-Making and the British Parliament -Europe

    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 67 Issue 2 Symposium on Parliamentary Participation in the Making and Operation of Article 9 Treaties June 1991 Treaty-Making and the British Parliament -Europe Chicago-Kent Law Review Templeman The Right Honourable The Lord Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Chicago-Kent Law Review Templeman The Right Honourable The Lord, Treaty-Making and the British Parliament -Europe, 67 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 459 (1991). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol67/iss2/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. TREATY-MAKING AND THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT THE RIGHT HONOURABLE THE LORD TEMPLEMAN* I. INTRODUCTION Under English law the capacity to negotiate and conclude treaties falls entirely to the executive arm of government. Nominally Parliament plays no role at all in this process. This paper will explain the British system, the different functions of the executive and legislature, the pro- cess of concluding and implementing treaties, and finally the role played by the courts in upholding this system. An understanding of how trea- ties are entered into and implemented in British law depends on an ap- preciation of the division between the international aspects of treaty- making and the domestic aspects of implementation.
  • Archives D'histoire Contemporaine Archives De Bernard Poignant

    Archives D'histoire Contemporaine Archives De Bernard Poignant

    Archives d’histoire contemporaine Archives de Bernard Poignant POI Établi par Émeline Grolleau, archiviste des AHC, sous la direction d'Odile Gaultier- Voituriez, responsable de la coordination archivistique et documentaire du CEVIPOF et du CHSP 2019 Bernard Poignant © Annie Poignant, Tous droits réservés. 2 Introduction Zone d'identification Référence POI Intitulé Poignant Bernard Dates extrêmes 1975-2017 Niveau de description Fonds Nombre d’articles 9 Importance matérielle (ml) 1.05 Zone du contexte Nom du producteur Bernard Poignant Notice biographique Bernard Poignant est né le 19 septembre 1945 à Vannes (Morbihan). Il passe en 1970 l’agrégation d’histoire et devient professeur à l’École normale de Quimper en 1971 puis à l’université de Bretagne occidentale. Il adhère au Parti socialiste (PS) en 1974 et s’engage dès 1975 au sein de la section socialiste de Quimper comme secrétaire. Il occupe, à partir de ce moment-là, de nombreuses responsabilités au sein du Parti socialiste tant au niveau local que national. De 1978 à 1981, il est premier secrétaire de la fédération du Finistère du PS et, à partir de 1981, il devient membre du comité directeur puis du conseil national et du bureau exécutif du PS. Il est, de 1993 à 2001, président de la Fédération nationale des élus socialistes et républicains (FNESR). Il se présente pour la première fois aux élections municipales en 1977 et l'année suivante, il est candidat aux élections législatives. Il est battu les deux fois. En 1981, il est élu député du Finistère. Il se présente, entre 1978 et 1997, cinq fois aux élections législatives pour la première circonscription du Finistère.
  • History • Philippine Ambassador Jt I N B J ...?Ydi^B^ Carlos Romulo and Mrs

    History • Philippine Ambassador Jt I N B J ...?Ydi^B^ Carlos Romulo and Mrs

    THE EVENING STAR their daughter Cynthia at ragua’s Ambassador Sevilla- C-2 Woihingtn, D. C., ftitloy, law 13, Hit Bryn Mawr, are staying at Sacasa. put In a brief their country place. Valley appearance House, at Brookevllle, Md. and others from Their first stop was In New Embassy Row Included the Orleans (Mr. Butterworth’s Turkish Ambassador and rl dpil »• ’ t * ¦'* *¦»" 'i ' |B» I home), and they willreturn Mrs. Urguplu, Canada’s Am- next Thursday there when bassador Heeney Dr. Hallstein makes an ad- and the dress in the Louisiana city. Swiss Ambassador and Mrs. de Torrents. Other Notables Present Atomic Energy Commis- gfr 1 M J 1 The Netherlands Ambassa- sioner W. F. Libby, Deputy dor and Mrs. van Roljen. Undersecretary of State and the Italian Ambassador and . Mrs. Loy Henderson, the F < > Mrs. Broslo. Luxembourg f /i;f Undersecretary of the Inte- MT- r^HL^ Ambassador Helsbourg, Ger- rior and Mrs. Elmer F. Ben- man Charge d'Aflalres Frans nett, District Commissioner * iL.)t Krapf Belgium’s Charge B .•OB iwß v jM and Robert E. McLaughlin and ,#»! d’Aflalres Jean de Bassom- President Samuel C. Waugh . i | r plerre were among the diplo- of the Export-Import Bank matic guests at the recep- and Mrs. Waugh were still tion. others in the throng of .... The dean of the corps, Nlca- several hundred. them Lens- ()S.J ¦ s C , i Wr & fZr B fapnation or pick-up messenger. W b EUROPEAN HOSTS— Mr. Wolter Hollstein, president of the Commission of European Economic Community (left); Mr. Etienne Hirsch, president of bb _ j/ ' European Atomic Energy Community, ond Mr.
  • Appendix D – Speech by the Hon Alexander Downer MP, Minister for Foreign Affairs

    Appendix D – Speech by the Hon Alexander Downer MP, Minister for Foreign Affairs

    D Appendix D – Speech by the Hon Alexander Downer MP, Minister for Foreign Affairs The Lobby Restaurant, Canberra, Thursday 30 March 2006 (unchecked against delivery) Ladies and gentlemen, Fellow Parliamentarians. Whichever party we come from or support, Liberal, National, Labor or a minor party, I believe we share common ground in wanting to see democracy thrive. Abroad, we see democracy being exercised by millions previously subjected to tyranny and oppression. Australia is playing its part in this liberation. It is equally important that we safeguard democratic principles and institutions at home. Tonight, we gather to put aside party differences for a moment and celebrate the strength of the Australian Commonwealth and our democratic traditions on this, the tenth, anniversary of the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties. 138 TREATY SCRUTINY: A TEN YEAR REVIEW It was back in May 1996 that I set out in Parliament the case for a package of reforms aimed at improving parliamentary scrutiny and public consultation in Australia’s treaty-making process. JSCOT was a major part of that package and has, in its ten years, helped fill what had been seen as a “democratic deficit”, which was undermining public confidence. No longer can Australian Governments legitimately be accused of entering into binding international obligations without adequate democratic consultation. At the same time, the Executive’s capacity to act decisively to further the national interest has been maintained. Tonight, I would like to pay tribute to the key contributions to the public good made by JSCOT and the parliamentarians who have served on it. Ladies and gentlemen, It was with great conviction that the eminent 18th century jurist, Sir William Blackstone, declared that legislative assemblies should never be involved in the conclusion of treaties.
  • Chronicle of an Election Foretold: the Longer-Term Trends Leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ Procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker As European

    Chronicle of an Election Foretold: the Longer-Term Trends Leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ Procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker As European

    LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series Chronicle of an Election Foretold: The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission President Martin Westlake LEQS Paper No. 102/2016 January 2016 LEQS is generously supported by the LSE Annual Fund Editorial Board Dr Joan Costa-i-Font Dr Vassilis Monastiriotis Dr Jonathan White Dr Katjana Gattermann Dr Sonja Avlijas All views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the LSE. © Martin Westlake Chronicle of an Election Foretold: The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission President Martin Westlake* Abstract By focusing on the near-term campaign in the 2014 European elections analysts have tended to over-look a series of longer-term trends that were jointly and inexorably leading to the Spitzenkandidaten (lead candidate) process and to some at least of the subsequent structural reforms to the Commission. The paper argues that those longer-term trends continue and that the (s)election of Jean-Claude Juncker as President of the European Commission and the structural reforms he subsequently introduced are better understood as steps in ongoing processes rather than fresh departures. Thus, what will happen in 2019 will have been conditioned not only by 2014, but also by previous elections and previous developments, as considered in this paper. Keywords: European Commission Presidency, Jean-Claude Juncker, Spitzenkandidaten, European Parliament, Longer-Term Trends * Visiting Professor, College of Europe, Bruges Senior Visiting Fellow, European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE Email: [email protected] The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure Table of Contents 1.
  • Rapport D'activité De La Section Française De L'assemblée

    Rapport D'activité De La Section Française De L'assemblée

    Rapport d'activité de la section française de l'Assemblée parlementaire de la francophonie 1er octobre 1998 - 1er octobre 1999 - 3 - SOMMAIRE Pages Bureau de la commission de l'Éducation, de la communication et des affaires culturelles 7 Paris, 4 novembre 1998 Bureau de la commission Politique 9 Paris, 26 novembre 1998 Délégation permanente du Bureau 11 Paris, 26 novembre 1998 Séminaire parlementaire : « Les fonctions législative et de contrôle du Parlement » 13 Vientiane (Laos), 14 - 16 décembre 1998 Communications de M. Alain Barrau au nom de la section française : . le contrôle de l'action gouvernementale . le contrôle parlementaire de l'application des lois Assemblée générale de la section française 39 Paris, 23 décembre 1998 Bureau de l'Assemblée parlementaire de la Francophonie 43 Saint-Denis de la Réunion (France), 19 - 21 janvier 1999 Commission de l'Éducation, de la communication et des affaires culturelles 45 Niamey (Niger), 14 - 16 février 1999 - 4 - Audition de M. Charles Josselin, ministre délégué à la coopération et à la francophonie 49 Paris, 17 février 1999 Commission Politique 57 Le Caire (Égypte), 23 - 25 février 1999 Commission de la coopération et du développement 59 Ho Chi Minh Ville (Vietnam), 15 - 19 mars 1999 ••• Rapport de M. Jacques Brunhes au nom de la section française sur "L'économie informelle dans les pays francophones" Commission des Affaires parlementaires 79 Beyrouth (Liban), 15-16 avril 1999 Assemblée générale de la section française 81 Paris, 28 avril 1999 Conférence des Présidents de la Région Europe 83 Bruxelles, 5-6mai 1999 Délégation permanente du Bureau 85 Paris, 1er juin 1999 Bureau de l'Assemblée parlementaire de la Francophonie 87 Ottawa, 3 juillet 1999 - 5 - XXVème session de l'Assemblée parlementaire de la Francophonie 89 Ottawa, 5 - 8 juillet 1999 Rapport de M.