DOCSLIB.ORG

Marathon Oil Corporation 2005 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marathon Oil Corporation 2005 Annual Report MARATHON OIL CORPORATION 5555 San Felipe Road Houston, TX 77056-2723 Marathon Oil Corporation The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved reserves. In this summary annual report wrap, we use certain terms to refer to reserves other than proved reserves, which the SEC’s 2005 Annual Report guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. These terms include reserves, resources and other similar terms, which are not yet classified as proved reserves. This summary annual report wrap also contains forward-looking statements about Marathon’s business including, but not limited to, the timing and levels of production, future exploration and drilling activity, reserve or resource additions, a plan for development and operation of the Alvheim and Vilje fields, an LNG project and possible expansion plans, the Neptune development, estimated levels and timing of production associated with the Company’s return to Libya, possible expansion of the Garyville, Louisiana, refinery and a $2 billion common stock repurchase program. The information related to reserve or resource additions is based on certain assumptions, including, among others, presently known physical data concerning size and characteristics of reservoirs, economic recoverability, technology development, future drilling success, production experience, and other economic and operating conditions. In accordance with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Marathon has included in its attached Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, cautionary language identifying other important factors, though not necessarily all such factors, that could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. 2005: A year of growth across all Corporate Information Corporate Headquarters Section 302 Certifications and NYSE CEO Certification 5555 San Felipe Road Marathon Oil Corporation has filed the certifications of its chief Houston, TX 77056-2723 executive officer and chief financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 31.1 and business segments. Marathon Oil Corporation Web site 31.2 to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended www.marathon.com December 31, 2005. In May 2005, Marathon's chief executive Investor Relations Office officer, as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed 5555 San Felipe Road (77056-2723) Company Manual, submitted his certification to the NYSE that P.O. Box 3128 (77253-3128) he was not aware of any violation by Marathon of the NYSE's Houston, TX corporate governance listing standards. Kenneth L. Matheny, Vice President, Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan Investor Relations and Public Affairs The Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan pro- [email protected] vides stockholders with a convenient way to purchase additional 713-296-4114 shares of Marathon Oil Corporation Common Stock without Howard J. Thill, Director, payment of any brokerage fees or service charges through Investor Relations investment of cash dividends or through optional cash payments. [email protected] Stockholders of record can request a copy of the Plan Prospectus 713-296-4140 and an authorization form from National City Bank. Beneficial Notice of Annual Meeting holders should contact their brokers. The 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held Lost Stock Certificate in Houston, Texas, on April 26, 2006. If a stock certificate is lost, stolen or destroyed, notify National Independent Accountants City Bank in writing so that a stop transfer can be placed on PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the missing certificate. National City Bank will send you the 1201 Louisiana, Suite 2900 necessary forms and instructions for obtaining a replacement Houston, TX 77002-5678 certificate. You may be required to obtain and pay for the cost of an indemnity bond. If you find the missing certificate, notify Common Stock Exchange Listings National City Bank in writing immediately so that the stop New York Stock Exchange (Principal Exchange) transfer can be removed. To avoid loss, theft or destruction, Chicago Stock Exchange we recommend that you keep your certificates in a safe place, Pacific Stock Exchange such as a safe deposit box at your bank. Common Stock Symbol Taxpayer Identification Number MRO Federal law requires that each stockholder provide a certified Principal Stock Transfer Agent Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) for his/her stockholder Marathon employees continue to deliver on National City Bank, Loc. 5352 account. For individual stockholders, your TIN is your Social Corporate Trust Operations Security Number. If you do not provide a certified TIN, P.O. Box 92301 Marathon may be required to withhold 28 percent for federal Cleveland, OH 44193-0900 income taxes from your dividends. 888-843-5542 (Toll free) Address Change a successful strategy that sets us apart from 216-257-8508 (Fax) It is important that you notify National City Bank immediately, [email protected] by phone, in writing or by fax, when you change your address. Annual Report on Form 10-K As a convenience, you also may indicate an address change on Additional copies of the Marathon 2005 Annual Report the face of your quarterly dividend check. Seasonal addresses our competitors and creates shareholder value. may be obtained by contacting: can be entered for your account. Public Affairs Exchange of Certificate 5555 San Felipe Road If you have not done so, we recommend you return any USX Room 4150 Corporation or United States Steel Corporation Common Stock Houston, TX 77056-2723 certificates which were issued prior to May 7, 1991, in exchange 713-296-3911 for certificates for Marathon Oil Corporation Common Stock. Dividends Certificates should be sent to National City Bank. Dividends on Common Stock, as declared by the board of Range of Marathon Stock Sale Prices and Dividends Paid directors, are normally paid on the tenth day of March, June, September and December. 2005 Quarter High Low Dividend Dividend Checks Not Received / Electronic Deposit First $48.76 $35.73 $0.28 If you do not receive your dividend check on the appropriate pay- Second 55.58 44.00 0.28 ment date, we suggest you wait about 10 days after the payment date to allow for any delay in mail delivery. After that time, Third 70.83 54.69 0.33 advise National City Bank by phone or in writing for a replace- Fourth 69.21 56.28 0.33 ment check to be issued. You also may contact National City Year $70.83 $35.73 $1.22 Bank to authorize direct electronic deposit of your dividends or interest into your bank account. Upstream Integrated Gas Downstream Exploration: Marathon’s exploration Marathon’s integrated gas business Refining, Marketing and Transportation: activities are focused on adding prof- is adding value through the development Marathon has extensive refining, market- itable production to existing core areas of opportunities created by the growing ing and transportation (RM&T) or down- in the United States, Equatorial Guinea demand for natural gas. The Company stream operations in the United States. and the North Sea, and to developing is linking stranded natural gas resources Marathon ranks as the fifth-largest potential new core areas such as Angola. with areas where a supply gap is emerg- petroleum refiner in the United States and ing due to declining production and the largest in the Midwest. Concentrated Production: Marathon’s production oper- growing demand – particularly in North in the Midwest, Upper Great Plains, Gulf ations, located in eight countries around America. A key component of the Coast and Southeast regions of the United the world, supply crude oil and natural Company’s integrated gas business is States, Marathon’s RM&T operations gas to the growing world energy market. liquefied natural gas (LNG). Over the past are strategically located to serve major Worldwide operations are focused in the three years, Marathon has established markets and include a seven-plant refining United States, Europe, West Africa, Libya an Atlantic Basin LNG business that network with 974,000 bpd of crude oil and Russia. In 2005, worldwide daily pro- encompasses both ends of the LNG throughput capacity, a comprehensive duction averaged 191 mbpd of liquids and process, the liquefaction or source side terminal and transportation system, and 932 mmcfd of natural gas, or 346 mboed. and the regasification or supply side. extensive marketing operations. Key production investments continue in Norway, where the Company is proceeding with the Alvheim/Vilje developments, and in the Gulf of Mexico, where the Company is part of the Neptune development. Contents 02 Letter to Stockholders 08 Integrated Gas 16 Board of Directors 03 Financial Highlights 11 Refining, Marketing & 16 Corporate Officers Transportation 07 Exploration & Production ibc Corporate Information 12 Corporate Social Responsibility 2005 Segment Income as a Percent of Total 2005 Capital Expenditures by Segment 49% 1% 50% 51% 20% 29% Upstream Integrated Gas Downstream Upstream Integrated Gas Downstream 1 Dear Fellow Stockholders: Four years ago, we outlined a strategic plan and a business model to differentiate Marathon from our competitors. We resolved to remain an integrated energy company, to grow new core areas and to establish a profitable integrated gas business. We defined our vision
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bakken Production Optimization Program Prospectus
    Bakken Production Optimization Program BAKKEN PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION PROGRAM 2.0 PROSPECTUS PROGRAM INTRODUCTION Led by the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC), the highly successful Bakken Production Optimization Program (BPOP), funded by its members and the North Dakota Industrial Commission, is continuing for the time frame of 2017–2020. The goal of this research program, BPOP 2.0, is to improve Bakken system oil recovery and reduce its environmental footprint. The results of the 3-year program will increase well productivity and the economic output of North Dakota’s oil and gas resources, decrease environmental impacts of wellsite operations, and reduce demand for infrastructure construction and maintenance. BPOP 1.0 PARTNERS A premier partnership program was recently completed which has been cited as an exemplary model by others nationwide. It has demonstrated that state lawmakers, state regulators, and industry can work together for positive results for shareholders and taxpayers alike. Phase I partners focused research on industry-driven challenges and opportunities. Continental Resources, Inc. ® Marathon Oil Corporation America’s Oil Champion Whiting Petroleum Corporation North Dakota Oil and Gas Research Program ConocoPhillips Company Nuverra Environmental Solutions Hitachi Hess Corporation Oasis Petroleum, Inc. SM Energy XTO Energy, Inc. BPOP 1.0 ACHIEVEMENTS (2013–2016) Continental’s Hawkinson Project Water Use and Handling Forecast Aimed at significantly increasing total production and A summary of trends in the Bakken, an estimation of production rates from North Dakota oil wells where oil future demand/disposal needs, an overview of treatment reserves of the second and third benches of the Three technologies, recycling/reuse considerations, and a Forks Formation, located just below the Bakken oil summary of implications for BPOP partners were created.
    [Show full text]
  • Whiting Petroleum Corporation and Our Ability to Grow MMBOE: One Million BOE
    Whiting Petroleum Corporation ANNUAL REPORT 8 0 0 2 NATU RAL HUM+AN Resources ABOUT THE COVER Having assembled a solid foundation of quality assets through acquisition, we are now more focused on organic drilling activity and on the development of previously acquired properties. We believe that our experienced team of management, engineering and geoscience professionals is generating superior results as evidenced by our reserves and production growth in the Bakken formation in North CONTENTS Dakota and our two CO 2 enhanced oil recovery projects. Corporate Profile 1 From our Bakken play in North Dakota, our average net daily production jumped 516% to 14,165 BOE in December 2008 Financial and Operations Summary 2 from 2,300 BOE in December 2007. We also completed Letter to the Shareholders 4 our first two infill wells in the Sanish field, which we believe Drilling and Operations Overview 7 adds a total of 78 potential infill well locations. Also of note was our first Three Forks horizontal well completion in the Northern Rockies 8 Sanish field. Production and pressure data from this well are Central Rockies 10 being analyzed to determine the viability of developing the Three Forks in the Sanish field. EOR Projects 12 Board of Directors 14 At our two EOR projects, our average net daily production Annual Report on Form 10-K 15 from the Postle and North Ward Estes fields increased 26% to 13,700 BOE in December 2008 from 10,900 BOE in Corporate Investor Information Inside back cover December 2007. We expect production from both EOR projects to continue to increase as 2009 progresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking Operator by Gas 1999
    PDRANKOP UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PRODUCTION MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE 03-AUG-2000 GULF OF MEXICO REGION PAGE: 1 Production by Operator Ranked by Volume (4120) Start Date : 199901 Report Type : Report End Date : 199912 ASCII File Name: C:\TIMSWork\PDRANKOP.DAT Report Option: Order by Total Gas Group By : All Operator Crude Oil Condensate Total Oil Natural Gas Casinghead Total Gas (BBLS) (BBLS) (BBLS) (MCF) (MCF) (MCF) 02140 Shell Deepwater Production Inc. 85,672,533 9,411,739 95,084,272 245,810,790 213,353,317 459,164,107 00078 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 50,545,262 6,292,709 56,837,971 353,305,284 87,102,210 440,407,494 00689 Shell Offshore Inc. 15,438,780 6,417,500 21,856,280 300,789,310 30,544,202 331,333,512 00003 Union Oil Company of California 6,344,477 2,334,388 8,678,865 253,150,024 15,694,524 268,844,548 00276 Exxon Mobil Corporation 16,626,406 1,243,669 17,870,075 168,330,701 51,313,377 219,644,078 00771 Texaco Exploration and Production Inc 10,785,640 1,908,736 12,694,376 187,865,901 31,396,468 219,262,369 00114 Amoco Production Company 1,853,723 2,410,438 4,264,161 182,121,250 1,573,019 183,694,269 01855 Vastar Resources, Inc. 7,750,730 1,435,200 9,185,930 114,537,982 34,747,390 149,285,372 01364 Newfield Exploration Company 4,368,048 2,162,039 6,530,087 132,431,383 10,633,590 143,064,973 02332 PennzEnergy Exploration and Production 5,772,629 3,160,145 8,932,774 118,870,351 9,572,802 128,443,153 00491 Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation 1,038,860 1,682,412 2,721,272 119,028,667 2,687,097 121,715,764 02219 Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corporation 13,307,198 1,569,590 14,876,788 102,681,653 14,762,861 117,444,514 00185 Samedan Oil Corporation 2,673,355 2,285,513 4,958,868 104,938,141 7,424,318 112,362,459 00105 Apache Corporation 6,574,028 1,660,755 8,234,783 92,723,545 12,356,983 105,080,528 00059 Amerada Hess Corporation 9,001,254 7,825,335 16,826,589 76,749,036 23,640,310 100,389,346 00540 MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCING SOUT 8,967,820 1,142,597 10,110,417 88,168,916 11,699,694 99,868,610 01680 BP Exploration & Oil Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon Oil Corporation Creates Value by Responsibly Producing Oil and Natural Gas Vital to Meeting Growing Global Energy Needs
    Create, Grow, Sustain: BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE Celebrating Success 2014 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Marathon Oil Corporation creates value by responsibly producing oil and natural gas vital to meeting growing global energy needs. In doing so, we act responsibly toward our shareholders and business partners, support those who work for us, and strive to improve the communities where we operate. www.marathonoil.com/lov2012/index.shtml Our goal is to be recognized as the premier independent exploration and production company, and to accomplish this, we must successfully execute the strategic imperatives that guide our efforts. These imperatives begin with an uncompromising focus on our long-standing core values of health and safety, environmental stewardship, honesty and integrity, corporate citizenship, and a high-performance team culture. Our values help us protect our license to operate and drive business performance. We believe that developing oil To achieve sustainable and profitable growth, Marathon Oil is accelerating activity in our U.S. and gas resources in a safe, unconventional resource assets — the South Texas Eagle Ford Shale, North Dakota Bakken Shale and Oklahoma resource basins. These resource plays are at the forefront of the technology-driven environmentally sound and renaissance in the American oil and gas industry, which is making vast hydrocarbon resources available for the economic growth and energy security of our nation. responsible way is not only We recognize that the same spirit of technological discovery and innovation that is driving the possible, but also vital to the renaissance in the oil and gas industry can and will drive our ability to develop these important energy resources with less impact on the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    CALIFORNIA RESOURCES CORPORATION 2018 ANNUAL REPORT FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS Amounts in millions, except per-share amounts as of and for the years ended December 31, Financial Highlights 2018 2017 2016 Total Revenue $ 3,064 $ 2,006 $ 1,547 Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes $ 429 $ (262) $ 201 Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests $ 101 $ (4) $ - Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stock $ 328 $ (266) $ 279 Adjusted Net Income (Loss)(a) $ 61 $ (187) $ (317) Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stock per Share – Basic and Diluted(b) $ 6.77 $ (6.26) $ 6.76 Adjusted Net Income (Loss) per Share – Basic and Diluted(b) $ 1.27 $ (4.40) $ (7.85) Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities $ 461 $ 248 $ 130 Capital Investments $ 690 $ 371 $ 75 Net Payments on Debt $ 26 $ 18 $ 73 Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities $ 692 $ 73 $ (69) Total Assets $ 7,158 $ 6,207 $ 6,354 Long-Term Debt $ 5,251 $ 5,306 $ 5,168 Deferred Gain and Issuance Costs, Net $ 216 $ 287 $ 397 Equity $ (247) $ (720) $ (557) Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding(b) 47.4 42.5 40.4 Year-End Shares 48.7 42.9 42.5 Operational Highlights 2018 2017 2016 Production: Oil (MBbl/d) 82 83 91 NGLs (MBbl/d) 16 16 16 Natural Gas (MMcf/d) 202 182 197 Total (MBoe/d)(c) 132 129 140 Average Realized Prices: Oil with hedge ($/Bbl) $ 62.60 $ 51.24 $ 42.01 Oil without hedge ($/Bbl) $ 70.11 $ 51.47 $ 39.72 NGLs ($/Bbl) $ 43.67 $ 35.76 $ 22.39 Natural Gas ($/Mcf) $ 3.00 $ 2.67 $ 2.28 Reserves: Oil (MMBbl) 530 442 409 NGLs (MMBbl) 60 58 55 Natural Gas (Bcf) 734 706 626 Total (MMBoe)(c) 712 618 568 Organic Reserve Replacement Ratio(a) 127% 119% 71% PV-10 of Proved Reserves(a) (in billions) $ 9.4 $ 4.5 $ 2.8 Net Mineral Acreage (in thousands): Developed 701 703 717 Undeveloped 1,539 1,550 1,614 Total 2,240 2,253 2,331 Closing Share Price $ 17.04 $ 19.44 $ 21.29 (a) See www.crc.com, Investor Relations for a discussion of these non-GAAP measures, including a reconciliation to the most closely related GAAP measure or information on the related calculations.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon Petroleum Corporation [email protected]
    February 6, 2017 Molly R. Benson Marathon Petroleum Corporation [email protected] Re: Marathon Petroleum Corporation Incoming letter dated December 23, 2016 Dear Ms. Benson: This is in response to your letter dated December 23, 2016 concerning the shareholder proposal submitted to MPC by the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union. We also received a letter from the proponent on January 18, 2017. Copies of all of the correspondence on which this response is based will be made available on our website at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/14a-8.shtml. For your reference, a brief discussion of the Division’s informal procedures regarding shareholder proposals is also available at the same website address. Sincerely, Matt S. McNair Senior Special Counsel Enclosure cc: Shawn Gilchrist USW [email protected] February 6, 2017 Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance Re: Marathon Petroleum Corporation Incoming letter dated December 23, 2016 The proposal urges the board to report on the steps the company has taken to reduce the risk of accidents. The proposal further specifies that the report should describe the board’s oversight of process safety management, staffing levels, inspection and maintenance of facilities and other equipment. We are unable to concur in your view that MPC may exclude the proposal under rule 14a-8(i)(10). Based on the information you have presented, it does not appear that MPC’s public disclosures compare favorably with the guidelines of the proposal. Accordingly, we do not believe that MPC may omit the proposal from its proxy materials in reliance on rule 14a-8(i)(10).
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas
    Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Total score ACT rating Ranking out of 100 performance, narrative and trend 1 Neste 57.4 / 100 8.1 / 20 B 2 Engie 56.9 / 100 7.9 / 20 B 3 Naturgy Energy 44.8 / 100 6.8 / 20 C 4 Eni 43.6 / 100 7.3 / 20 C 5 bp 42.9 / 100 6.0 / 20 C 6 Total 40.7 / 100 6.1 / 20 C 7 Repsol 38.1 / 100 5.0 / 20 C 8 Equinor 37.9 / 100 4.9 / 20 C 9 Galp Energia 36.4 / 100 4.3 / 20 C 10 Royal Dutch Shell 34.3 / 100 3.4 / 20 C 11 ENEOS Holdings 32.4 / 100 2.6 / 20 C 12 Origin Energy 29.3 / 100 7.3 / 20 D 13 Marathon Petroleum Corporation 24.8 / 100 4.4 / 20 D 14 BHP Group 22.1 / 100 4.3 / 20 D 15 Hellenic Petroleum 20.7 / 100 3.7 / 20 D 15 OMV 20.7 / 100 3.7 / 20 D Total score ACT rating Ranking out of 100 performance, narrative and trend 17 MOL Magyar Olajes Gazipari Nyrt 20.2 / 100 2.5 / 20 D 18 Ampol Limited 18.8 / 100 0.9 / 20 D 19 SK Innovation 18.6 / 100 2.8 / 20 D 19 YPF 18.6 / 100 2.8 / 20 D 21 Compania Espanola de Petroleos SAU (CEPSA) 17.9 / 100 2.5 / 20 D 22 CPC Corporation, Taiwan 17.6 / 100 2.4 / 20 D 23 Ecopetrol 17.4 / 100 2.3 / 20 D 24 Formosa Petrochemical Corp 17.1 / 100 2.2 / 20 D 24 Cosmo Energy Holdings 17.1 / 100 2.2 / 20 D 26 California Resources Corporation 16.9 / 100 2.1 / 20 D 26 Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen (PKN Orlen) 16.9 / 100 2.1 / 20 D 28 Reliance Industries 16.7 / 100 1.0 / 20 D 29 Bharat Petroleum Corporation 16.0 / 100 1.7 / 20 D 30 Santos 15.7 / 100 1.6 / 20 D 30 Inpex 15.7 / 100 1.6 / 20 D 32 Saras 15.2 / 100 1.4 / 20 D 33 Qatar Petroleum 14.5 / 100 1.1 / 20 D 34 Varo Energy 12.4 / 100
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Decisions and Shareholder Value: an Analysis of Conocophillips Michael Miller University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Accounting Undergraduate Honors Theses Accounting 5-2012 Strategic decisions and shareholder value: an analysis of ConocoPhillips Michael Miller University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/acctuht Part of the Finance and Financial Management Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Michael, "Strategic decisions and shareholder value: an analysis of ConocoPhillips" (2012). Accounting Undergraduate Honors Theses. 3. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/acctuht/3 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Accounting at ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Accounting Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Strategic Decisions and Shareholder Value: An Analysis of ConocoPhillips By Michael Cameron Miller Advisor: Ms. Susan Bristow An Honors Thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Bachelor of Science in Business Administration in Accounting Sam M. Walton College of Business University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas May 11, 2012 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Resources Corporation (The “Company”) Believes Will Or May Occur in the Future Are Forward-Looking Statements
    FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS Dollar and share amounts in millions, except per-share amounts as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 2013 Financial Highlights Revenues $ 2,403 $ 4,173 $ 4,284 Income / (Loss) Before Income Taxes $ (5,476 ) $ (2,421 ) $ 1,447 Net Income / (Loss) $ (3,554 ) $ (1,434 ) $ 869 Adjusted Net Income / (Loss) (a) $ (311) $ 650 $ 869 EPS – Basic and Diluted (b) $ (9.27 ) $ (3.75 ) $ 2.24 Adjusted EPS – Basic and Diluted (b) $ (0.81) $ 1.67 $ 2.24 Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities $ 403 $ 2,371 $ 2,476 Capital Investments $ (401 ) $ (2,089 ) $ (1,669 ) Proceeds from Debt, Net $ 379 $ 6,360 — Cash Dividends to Occidental — $ (6,000 ) — Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities $ 352 $ (45) $ (763) Total Assets $ 7,053 $ 12,429 $ 14,297 Long-Term Debt – Principal Amount $ 6,043 $ 6,360 — Deferred Gain and Issuance Costs, Net $ 491 $ (68 ) — Equity / Net Investment $ (916) $ 2,611 $ 9,989 Weighted Average Shares Outstanding 383.2 381.9 — Year-End Shares 388.2 385.6 — Operational Highlights 2015 2014 2013 Production: Crude Oil (MBbl/d) 104 99 90 NGLs (MBbl/d) 18 19 20 Natural Gas (MMcf/d) 229 246 260 Total (MBoe/d) 160 159 154 Average Realized Prices: Crude with hedge ($/Bbl) $ 49.19 $ 92.30 $ 104.16 Crude without hedge ($/Bbl) $ 47.15 $ 92.30 $ 104.16 NGLs ($/Bbl) $ 19.62 $ 47.84 $ 50.43 Natural Gas with hedge ($/Mcf) $ 2.66 $ 4.39 $ 3.73 Reserves: Crude Oil (MMBbl) 466 551 532 NGLs (MMBbl) 59 85 71 Natural Gas (Bcf) 715 790 844 Total (MBoe/d) 644 768 744 Acreage (in thousands): Net Developed 736 716 701 Net Undeveloped 1,653 1,691 1,604 Total 2,389 2,407 2,305 Closing Share Price $ 2.33 $ 5.51 (a) For discussion of, or reconciliation to the most closely-related GAAP measure, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results,” in our Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • Boyd County Industrial Reports for Kentucky Counties
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Boyd County Industrial Reports for Kentucky Counties 1974 Industrial Resources: Boyd County - Ashland Kentucky Library Research Collections Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/boyd_cty Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Growth and Development Commons, and the Infrastructure Commons Recommended Citation Kentucky Library Research Collections, "Industrial Resources: Boyd County - Ashland" (1974). Boyd County. Paper 1. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/boyd_cty/1 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boyd County by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASHLAND AREA ASHL ^Sq miie^ 500 miles 5 .-."mCvj j -HVH' • ^^^iljlll BOYD COUNTY, KENTUCKY INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES ASHLAND AREA, KENTUCKY Prepared by The Kentucky Department of Commerce in cooperation with The Ashland Area Chamber of Commerce and The City of Catlettsburg 1974 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page INDUSTRIAL SITES i ASHLAND AREA, KENTUCKY - A RESOURCE PROFILE . 1 THE LABOR MARKET 5 Population Trends 5 General Employment Characteristics 5 Manufacturing Employment Trends by Industry 6 Major Ashland Area Manufacturing Firms, Their Products and Employment . 6 Wages 9 Labor Organizations 10 Estimated Male Labor Supply 10 Estimated Female Labor Supply 11 Per Capita Personal Income 11 TRANSPORTATION 15 Rail 15 Truck Service 15 Air 16 Water 16 Bus . 17 Taxi 17 Rental Services 17 POWER AND FUEL 19 Electricity 19 Natural Gas 19 Other Fuels . 19 WATER AND SEWERAGE 20 Water 20 Sewerage 21 LOCAL GOVERNMENT 23 City 23 County 23 iv Chapter Page Assessed Value of Property, 1973 .
    [Show full text]
  • Catlettsburg Refinery
    Catlettsburg Refinery Overview Marathon Petroleum Corp.’s (MPC) Catlettsburg refinery is in northeastern Kentucky on the western bank of the Big Sandy River, near the confluence with the Ohio River and has a total crude oil refining capacity of 277,000 barrels per calendar day (bpcd). The Catlettsburg refinery processes sweet and sour crude oils into gasoline, distillates, asphalt, aromatics, heavy fuel oil and propane. MPC completed construction of a condensate splitter in 2015, increasing the refinery’s capacity to process condensate from the Utica shale region. Pipelines, barges, transport trucks and rail are used to distribute products. Health, Safety & Environment Community > 2018 RC14001® Management System certification > Local conservation and biodiversity education programs > 2008-2017: Responsible Care® Management System at our certified Wildlife Habitat Council site certification > RT 23 Highway Cleanup > Inaugural Master Level member of KY EXCEL 2007 for > Community Advisory Panel Excellence in Environmental Leadership > Mutual aid and fire drills with local emergency responders > 2018 Beacon Award for Water Conservation > 2007-present: Career Day for 2,500 area eighth-grade > American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers and students the National Safety Council safety and environmental > Big Brothers Big Sisters, school-based mentoring performance awards program at Catlettsburg Elementary > 2012 Kentucky Northeast Region Business > A.D. Lewis Community Center, mentoring programs for Conservation Partner of the Year at risk
    [Show full text]
  • Big Oil Goes to College an Analysis of 10 Research Collaboration Contracts Between Leading Energy Companies and Major U.S
    ISTOCKPHOTO/SSHEPHARD Big Oil Goes to College An Analysis of 10 Research Collaboration Contracts between Leading Energy Companies and Major U.S. Universities Jennifer Washburn October 2010 (updated) WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG ii Center for American Progress | Big Oil Goes Back to College Big Oil Goes to College An Analysis of 10 Research Collaboration Contracts between Leading Energy Companies and Major U.S. Universities Jennifer Washburn With research assistance from Derrin Culp, and legal analysis and interpretation of university-industry research agreements by Jeremiah Miller October 2010 Contents 1 Preface 5 Introduction and summary 29 Energy research at U.S. universities 32 The university perspective 38 The energy industry perspective 45 The U.S. government perspective 49 A detailed analysis of 10 university-industry agreements to finance energy research 52 Table: Summary of main contract analysis findings 60 Overview of the 10 agreements: Major findings 69 Recommendations 74 Conclusion 75 Appendix one—Detailed contract review Arizona State University & BP Technology Ventures, Inc., a unit of BP PLC 85 Appendix two—Detailed contract review Energy Biosciences Institute University of California at Berkeley; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign & BP Technology Ventures, Inc., a unit of BP PLC 106 Appendix three —Detailed contract review University of California at Davis & Chevron Technology Ventures, LLC, a unit of Chevron Corp. 114 Appendix four—Detailed contract review Chevron Center of Research Excellence Colorado School of Mines & ChevronTexaco Energy Technology Co., a unit of Chevron Corp. 122 Appendix five—Detailed contract review Colorado Center for Biorefining and Biofuels University of Colorado, Boulder; Colorado State University; Colorado School of Mines; National Renewable Energy Laboratory & Numerous industrial partners 135 Appendix six—Detailed contract review Georgia Institute of Technology & Chevron Technology Ventures LLC, a unit of Chevron Corp.
    [Show full text]