The London School of Economics and Political Science WORKERS' SELF

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The London School of Economics and Political Science WORKERS' SELF The London School of Economics and Political Science WORKERS’ SELF-MANAGEMENT IN THE ‘YUGOSLAV ROAD TO SOCIALISM’: MARKET, MOBILISATION AND POLITICAL CONFLICT 1948-1962 Vladimir Unkovski-Korica A thesis submitted to the Department of International History at the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, April 2011 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. Abstract This is the first documented history of the birth and evolution of the workers’ councils system in Yugoslavia and the political conflicts that accompanied it. Straddling fourteen years, from the split with Moscow in 1948 to the re-opening of the national question for the first time after the Second World War in 1962, this thesis demonstrates that the progressive opening to the world market after the Tito-Stalin conflict intensified domestic struggles and centrifugal pulls on the federation. Using the archival materials of the ruling Communist Party, government and mass organisations, it explains the stages by which the market came to dominate the party-state’s mobilising strategies for society and the shop-floor. In Chapter 1, the introduction of workers’ councils is shown to have been a measure to reverse the extraordinary and democratising mobilisation that followed the break with the USSR, by splitting more advanced sections of the working class from those more tied to the countryside. Chapter 2 suggests that the umbilical cord set up from the West to ‘keep Tito afloat’ allowed the Yugoslav Communists to continue to invest in heavy industry over agriculture in order to escape underdevelopment. This created food shortages and massive resistance to managerial imperatives on the shop-floor. As the country fell deeper in debt, the government intensified market reform under the guise of expanding self-management in order to create an export sector. Chapter 3 sets the stage for open factional conflict in the leadership by noting the gulf between promise and reality in the workplace and on the terrain of complex and uneven domestic development. The main contribution of the thesis is to go beyond history as elite conflict and present it also as a process of class struggle with many mediating instances between the workplace and the state beholden to the world market. Acknowledgements The debts incurred during my work on this thesis are many. My principal tribute and thanks go to Anita Prazmowska, my supervisor, whose profound insight and generous support remained critical throughout. Her example and friendship are an inspiration for life. I am grateful also to a number of scholars and associates for their assistance and commentary at various stages of my research and writing: Jovo Bakic, Dayna Barnes, Robert Boyce, Tanya Harmer, Artemy Kalinovsky, SiniSa Korica, Todor Kuljic, Vladimir Markovid, Matija Medenica, Olivera Milosavljevic, Goran Music, Sanja Petrovic Todosijevic, Dragan PlavSic, Milan Radanovic, Svetozar Rajak, James Robertson, Ame Westad, and Andreja Zivkovic. Countless other friends and comrades active in the International Socialist tradition aided and shaped me in these years, and I hope I do not disappoint them. Various archivists and librarians came to my aid when I needed it. The Department of International History at LSE provided a stimulating environment for the endeavour, and I was privileged to have Dejan Jovic and David Priestland as my examiners. My devotion goes finally to those closest to me. Sara Bernard’s affection gave me vital equanimity and joy in the final stages of my labours. The love, care and companionship of Sneiana Korica, Branko Unkovski-Korica, Vladica Korica and Dimitrije Unkovski sustained and moved me, and will continue to do so. It is to them that I would dedicate my work. Any fault in the text itself must remain my own. Abbreviations c c Central Committee c v Central Council EC Executive Committee FNRJ Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia NFJ Popular Front of Yugoslavia KPJ Communist Party of Yugoslavia SIV Federal Executive Committee SKJ League of Communist of Yugoslavia SKOJ League of Communist Youth of Yugoslavia SSRNJ Socialist Alliance of Working People of Yugoslavia SSJ Confederation of Trade Unions of Yugoslavia Table of Contents INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1: FACTORIES TO THE WORKERS! Part I - Before the Split with Stalin Part II - ‘Renewal’ and the April Crisis: Towards NEP Part III - Towards the ‘Yugoslav Road to Socialism’ - By Umbilical Cord with the USA CHAPTER 2: BETWEEN STATE AND MARKET: WORKERS’ COUNCILS 1953-1958 Part I - ‘The dinar has indeed started running all relations among people’: Politics, self-management and the market Part II — Self-Management, Wages and the Hungarian Scenario: 1954-1956 Part III - Income Sharing, the Market and the Trbovlje Strike 1956-1958 CHAPTER 3:WORKERS’ SELF-MANAGEMENT, THE MARKET, AND THE RETURN OF THE NATIONAL QUESTION Part I - The Strikes and the Beginning of the Faction Fight Part II - Self-Management Economics, the Politics of Mobilisation and the State CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY Introduction Yugoslavia was the first country in Eastern Europe to develop a system combining worker participation in firms with a regulated market economy. Its non-aligned position between the Cold War blocs as well as its unusually complex multinational composition accentuated the country’s apparently unique route to development for the most part of the second half of the twentieth century. This thesis charts the evolution of the ‘Yugoslav Road to Socialism’ from its inception, following the Tito-Stalin split in 1948, to its first major economic and political crisis in 1961-1962, ending with an uneasy and provisional compromise in the country’s fractured leadership as represented by the resolutions of the Sixth Plenum of the Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia. The hypothesis put forward is that the external pressures, exacerbated in particular by the country’s western tilt in the Cold War and the debt trap it fell into as a means of securing independence from the Soviet bloc, gradually imposed the competitive imperative of accumulation for its own sake on Yugoslav development strategy, making impossible any notion of the polity evolving into a ‘free association of producers’. Prices of goods and services, including crucially labour, came to be compared to world prices in the search for a viable import-export balance. Efforts to organise work and stimulate production for international competition through a participatory economy encountered, domestically, conditions of underdevelopment and regional unevenness that further distorted the endeavour to attain equitable and smooth growth. Even as the dominant faction in the party leadership increasingly championed the pursuit of economies of scale on a federal level and on a market basis, for foreign competition, political struggles developed over control of assets and strategies towards labour, taking on a regional character but an ideological form: the defence of self-management against bureaucratic state centralism. 2 Historiography Titoist Yugoslavia drew much contemporary commentary and claimed a unique position in the Cold War set-up on account of its distinctive socio-economic system apparently based on a labour-managed economy. The post-socialist historiography, however, has produced no single documented study of the system of workers’ councils despite the slow release of documents through the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s.1 In that sense, the central plank of ‘self­ management socialism’ has been possibly the most high-profile casualty of the wars of the 1990s in the academic field. The domestic political scene in the 1950s as a whole has been a neglected topic on the research agenda since the end of the Cold War, and no comprehensive account has emerged.2 * The classical texts on post-war politics in the Anglo-Saxon world remain Dennison Rusinow’s The Yugoslav Experiment and A. Ross Johnson’s The Transformation of Communist Ideology? Two subsequent additions dealing with the impact of the Tito-Stalin split on domestic elites in the form of Ivo Banac’s With Stalin against Tito and Susan Woodward’s Socialist Unemployment dealing with the origins of the economic system have acquired the status of authoritative texts.4 Nevertheless, the political histories of the period with closest approximation to archival research are the late achievements of 1 An unpublished doctoral dissertation by Olivera Milosavljevid in fact appeared before the collapse, Driava i samoupravljanje: ¡949-1956: doktorska disertacija, Beograd, 1987. 2 The most thorough overview o f the decade is still George Walter Hoffman and Fred Warner Neal, Yugoslavia and the New Communism, New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1962. For a short introduction to workers’ councils, see Adolf Fox Sturmthal, Workers' Councils: A Study of Workplace Organization on Both Sides of the Iron Curtain, Harvard U.P; Oxford U.P, 1964. The official history is useful but without citation of documents: Dragan Markovid et al, Factories to their workers: chronicle about workers’ management in Yugoslavia, Belgrade: [s.n.], 1965 Dennison Rusinow, The Yugoslav Experiment 1948-1974, London: Hurst for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1977 and A. Ross Johnson, The Transformation of Communist Ideology: The Yugoslav Case 1945-1953, Cambridge, Mass., 1972. Ivo Banac, With Stalin against Tito: Cominformist Splits in Yugoslav Communism, Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 1988, and Susan Woodward, Socialist Unemployment: The Political Economy of Yugoslavia, 1945-1990, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, c.
Recommended publications
  • Radovan Karadžić: Godine Suđenja Ratnom Lideru
    IZDAVAČ Radovan Karadžić: Godine suđenja ratnom lideru Zbirka svih članaka BIRN-a o suđenju Radovanu Karadžiću pred Međunarodnim krivičnim sudom za bivšu Jugoslaviju i Međunarodnim rezidualnim mehanizmom UN-a za krivične sudove. Ova elektronska knjiga sadrži vesti, analize, intervjue i druge članke o suđenju bivšem lideru bosanskih Srba za zločine koji mu se stavljaju na teret, uključujući genocid, ratne zločine i zločine protiv čovečnosti počinjene tokom sukoba u Bosni i Hercegovini. Proizvedeno od strane Balkanske istraživačke regionalne mreže. Uvod U toku mandata Radovana Karadžića, ratnog predsednika Republike Srp- ske, eniteta naseljenog prevashodno Srbima, počinjeni su neki od na- jstrašnijih zločina na tlu Evrope nakon Drugog svetskog rata. Nakon što mu je, u martu 2016. godine, izrečena prvostepena presuda, na koju je uložio žalbu 20. marta 2019. godine, 73-godišnjem Karadžiću biće izrečena konačna presuda. Prvostepenom presudom proglašen je krivim za genocid u Srebrenici, progon i istrebljenje Hrvata i Bošnjaka iz 20 opština širom Bosne i Her- cegovine, a osuđen je i za učešće u zajedničkom zločinačkom poduhvatu terorisanja civilnog stanovništva Sarajeva tokom opsade ovog grada. Pored toga, proglašen je krivim i za držanje pripadnika mirovnih snaga Ujedin- jenih nacija taocima. Optužnica protiv Karadžića podignuta je od strane Međunarodnog kriv- ičnog suda za bivšu Jugoslaviju 1995. godine. Karadžić je potom proveo 12 godina u bekstvu, a konačno je uhapšen u Beogradu 2008. godine i izručen tribunalu UN-a. Kao bivši predsednik Republike Srpske i vrhovni komandant vojske bosan- skih Srba, predstavlja jednu od najviše rangiranih političkih ličnosti op- tuženih pred sudom u Hagu. BIRN je pažljivo pratio celokupno suđenje Karadžiću i do sada smo ob- javili više od 570 priča, analiza i mišljenja, intervjua i drugih članaka na ovu temu.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX 2 Crosstabulations of the Survey Questions with The
    "WHO OWNS ALEXANDER THE GREAT?": A QUESTION UPON WHICH EU ENLARGEMENT RELIES ANNEX 2 Crosstabulations of the survey questions with the respondents ethnicity According to you which was the most important period for the formation of Macedonian identity? Ethnicity Macedonian Albanian Turk According to you which Antiquity 7.6% 0.5% was the most important Medieval Slavic Christianity (period of 22.2% 12.5% 21.9% period for formation of Brothers Cyril and Methodius) Macedonian identity? Ilinden Uprising (organized revolt 16.7% 1.9% 18.8% against the Ottoman Empire 1903) Partisan period of WWII 7.6% 4.6% 15.6% SFR Yugoslavia 14.5% 19.0% 18.8% Independence (1991- present) 21.5% 19.4% 12.5% Bucharest agreement (1913) 0.2% I don’t know 7.5% 13.9% 12.5% No answer 2.0% 28.2% They are all important The end of the 19century 0.2% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 % Ethnicity Roma Serbian Vlach Other According to you which Antiquity 4.5% 18.2% was the most important Medieval Slavic Christianity 17.4% 13.6% 32.0% 4.5% period for formation of (period of Brothers Cyril Macedonian identity? and Methodius) Ilinden Uprising (organized 8.7% 18.2% 12.0% 18.2% revolt against the Ottoman Empire 1903) Partisan period of WWII 13.0% 18.2% 12.0% SFR Yugoslavia 32.6% 22.7% 20.0% 45.5% Independence (1991- 8.7% 18.2% 20.0% 13.6% present) Bucharest agreement (1913) I don’t know 15.2% 4.0% No answer 4.3% They are all important 4.5% The end of the 19century Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Ethnicity Total Refuse to answer According to you which was the Antiquity 5.8% most important
    [Show full text]
  • A THREAT to "STABILITY" Human Rights Violations in Macedonia
    Macedoni Page 1 of 10 A THREAT TO "STABILITY" Human Rights Violations in Macedonia Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch Copyright © June 1996 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN: 1-56432-170-3 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 96-77111 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was researched and written by Fred Abrahams, a consultant to Human Rights Watch/Helsinki. It is based primarily on a mission to Macedonia conducted in July and August 1995. During that time, Human Rights Watch/Helsinki spoke with dozens of people from all ethnic groups and political persuasions. Extensive interviews were conducted throughout the country with members of government, leaders of the ethnic communities, human rights activists, diplomats, journalists, lawyers, prison inmates and students. The report was edited by Jeri Laber, Senior Advisor to Human Rights Watch/Helsinki. Anne Kuper provided production assistance. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki would like to thank the many people in Macedonia and elsewhere who assisted in the preparation of this report, especially those who took the time to read early drafts. Thanks also go to those members of the Macedonian government who helped by organizing a prison visit, providing information or granting lengthy interviews. I. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Macedonia faces difficulties on several fronts. As a former member of the Yugoslav federation, the young republic is in a transition from communism in which it must decentralize its economy, construct democratic institutions and revitalize its civil society. These tasks, demanding under any circumstances, have been made more difficult by Macedonia's proximity to the war in Bosnia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia to War, to Dayton, and to Its Slow Peace – European Council On
    REPORT BOSNIA TO WAR, TO DAYTON, AND TO ITS SLOW PEACE Carl Bildt January 2021 SUMMARY The international community was gravely unprepared for the conflicts that followed the dissolution of Yugoslavia. In particular, it neglected the challenge of Bosnia. Europe alone was not enough to bring peace, and the United States went from disinterested to disruptive and finally to decisive for a credible peace process. Russia in those days was a constructive actor. The war in Bosnia lasted years longer than it should have more because of the divisions between outside powers than because of the divisions within the country and the region itself. The fundamentals of the Dayton Agreement in 1995 were not too dissimilar from what had been discussed, but not pursued, prior to the outbreak of the war. It is a solution that is closer to the reality of Belgium than to the reality of Cyprus. After the war, many political leaders in Bosnia saw peace as the continuation of the war by other means, which has seriously hampered economic and social progress. Ultimately, it will be difficult to sustain progress for Bosnia or the region without a credible and clear EU accession process. INTRODUCTION It was a quarter of a century ago that the most painful conflict on European soil since the second world war came to an end. Peace agreements are rare birds. Most conflicts end either with the victory of one of the sides or some sort of ceasefire that is rarely followed by a true peace agreement. The map of Europe shows a number of such ‘frozen conflicts’.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasserism 1 Nasserism
    Nasserism 1 Nasserism Nasserism Ideology Arab nationalism, Pan-Arabism, Arab socialism Nasserism is an Arab nationalist political ideology based on the thinking of the former Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser. It was a major influence on pan-Arab politics in the 1950s and 1960s, and continues to have significant resonance throughout the Arab World to this day. It also metamorphosed into other nationalist movements during the 1970s. However, the scale of the Arab defeat in the Six Day War of 1967 severely damaged the standing of Nasser, and the ideology associated with him. Nasser himself died in 1970, and certain important tenets of Nasserism were revised or abandoned totally by his successor as Egyptian President, Anwar El-Sadat. During Nasser's lifetime, Nasserist groups were encouraged and often supported financially by Egypt, to the extent that many became seen as willing agents of the Egyptian Government. Ideology Nasserism is an Arab nationalist and pan-Arab ideology, combined with a vaguely defined socialism, often distinguished from Eastern bloc or Western socialist thought by the label 'Arab socialism'. Though opposed ideologically to Western capitalism, Arab socialism also developed as a rejection of communism, which was seen as incompatible with Arab traditions, and the religious underpinnings of Arab society. As a consequence, Nasserists from the 1950s to the 1980s sought to prevent the rise of communism in the Arab World, and advocated harsh penalties for individuals and organizations identified as attempting to spread communism within the region. Though mindful of the Islamic and Christian heritage of the Arab World, as with Ba'athism, Nasserism is largely a secular ideology.[1] [2] Just as with other manifestations of Arab nationalism, this led to direct conflict with Islamic orientated Arab political movements from the 1950s onwards, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Utjecaj I Rizici Klimatskih Promjena
    A M A R Č A U Š E V I Ć S A S J A B E S L I K F A R U K H A D Ž I Ć R O B E R T G R I F F I N HERCEGOVINABOSNA I KLIMATSKIHUTJECAJ PROMJENA I RIZICI BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA UTJECAJ I RIZICI KLIMATSKIH PROMJENA Amar Čaušević Sasja Beslik Faruk Hadžić Robert Griffin Autori: Amar Čaušević Sasja Beslik Faruk Hadžić Robert Griffin Recenzenti: Admir Čavalić Edhem 'Eddie' Čustović Izdavač: Multi, Damira Hadžibeganovića 115 75000 Tuzla, Bosna i Hercegovina Lektor: Adnan Imamović Amar Kavgić Tabele i grafikoni: Autori Ilustracije i slike: Canva Štampa Elektronsko izdanje ---------------------------------------- CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji Nacionalna i univerzitetska biblioteka Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 551.583:338(497.6) BOSNA i Hercegovina [Elektronski izvor] : utjecaj i rizici klimatskih promjena / Amar Čausević ... [et al.]. - El. knjiga. - Tuzla : Udruženje građana Multi, 2020 Način pristupa (URL): http://multi.ba/sve-publikacije/. - Nasl. sa nasl. ekrana. - Opis izvora dana 29. 9. 2020. ISBN 978-9926-8496-1-0 1.Čausević, Amar COBISS.BH-ID 40692230 -------------------------------------- Prvo izdanje, Sarajevo, 2020. Sva prava zadržana. Zabranjeno kopiranje, umnožavanje i distribucija bez pismenog odobrenja izdavača. Stavovi izraženi u ovoj knjizi su isključivo stavovi autora i ne odražavaju nužno stavove recenzenata. SADRŽAJ POPIS SKRAĆENICA 7 PREDGOVOR 8 SAŽETAK 11 KONTEKST ZEMLJE 13 Socioekonomski kontekst i politička pozadina 13 Tabela 1. Glavne društveno-ekonomske statistike BiH 14 Uloga fosilnih goriva u ekonomiji Bosne i Hercegovine 15 Percepcija klimatskih promjena u Bosni i Hercegovini 16 KLIMATSKE PROMJENE UNUTAR INSTITUCIONALNOG UREĐENJA I ZAKONSKIH OKVIRA 17 Slika 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Historical Events in Greek Occupied Macedonia Part 3
    Analysis of historical events in Greek occupied Macedonia Part 3 An interview with Risto Stefov Analysis of historical events in Greek occupied Macedonia An interview with Risto Stefov Part 3 Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2018 by Risto Stefov e-book edition *** April 12, 2018 *** 2 INTERVIEWER – In this interview I would like to ask you some questions about your family and verify some of the things your dad and uncle had said to me in their interviews. Was your grandfather Risto involved in the Illinden Uprising? I remember seeing a photo on someone’s wall. What can you tell me about his life in the village? RISTO – My grandfather Risto was not involved in the Ilinden Uprising because, from what my father had told me, he was not in Macedonia. He was on pechalba (migrant work) but I don’t know where and for how long. He purchased a rifle and wanted to return but the borders were shut and he could not come back in time. He did come back later and brought the rifle with him and gave it to his oldest son Lazo who then used it during the German-Italian- Bulgarian occupation when he was a partisan for a brief period of time before he died in 1943.
    [Show full text]
  • YUGOSLAV-SOVIET RELATIONS, 1953- 1957: Normalization, Comradeship, Confrontation
    YUGOSLAV-SOVIET RELATIONS, 1953- 1957: Normalization, Comradeship, Confrontation Svetozar Rajak Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London School of Economics and Political Science University of London February 2004 UMI Number: U615474 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615474 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ” OF POUTICAL «, AN0 pi Th ^ s^ s £ £2^>3 ^7&2io 2 ABSTRACT The thesis chronologically presents the slow improvement of relations between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, starting with Stalin’s death on 5 March 1953, through their full normalization in 1955 and 1956, to the renewed ideological confrontation at the end of 1956. The normalization of Yugoslav-Soviet relations brought to an end a conflict between Yugoslavia and the Eastern Bloc, in existence since 1948, which threatened the status quo in Europe. The thesis represents the first effort at comprehensively presenting the reconciliation between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, between 1953 and 1957. It will also explain the motives that guided the leaderships of the two countries, in particular the two main protagonists, Josip Broz Tito and Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev, throughout this process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: the Macedonian Question—Resolved?
    Nationalities Papers (2020), 48: 2, 205–214 doi:10.1017/nps.2020.10 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EVENTS The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: The Macedonian Question—Resolved? Matthew Nimetz* Former Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations and former Special Envoy of President Bill Clinton, New York, USA *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract The dispute between Greece and the newly formed state referred to as the “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” that emerged out of the collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991 was a major source of instability in the Western Balkans for more than 25 years. It was resolved through negotiations between Athens and Skopje, mediated by the United Nations, resulting in the Prespa (or Prespes) Agreement, which was signed on June 17, 2018, and ratified by both parliaments amid controversy in their countries. The underlying issues involved deeply held and differing views relating to national identity, history, and the future of the region, which were resolved through a change in the name of the new state and various agreements as to identity issues. The author, the United Nations mediator in the dispute for 20 years and previously the United States presidential envoy with reference to the dispute, describes the basis of the dispute, the positions of the parties, and the factors that led to a successful resolution. Keywords: Macedonia; Greece; North Macedonia; “Name” dispute The Macedonian “name” dispute was, to most outsiders who somehow were faced with trying to understand it, certainly one of the more unusual international confrontations. When the dispute was resolved through the Prespa Agreement between Greece and (now) the Republic of North Macedonia in June 2018, most outsiders (as frequently expressed to me, the United Nations mediator for 20 years) responded, “Why did it take you so long?” And yet, as protracted conflicts go, the Macedonian “name” dispute is instructive as to the types of issues that go to the heart of a people’s identity and a nation’s sense of security.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Outreach Report 2012 ICTY Annual Outreach Report 2012
    UNITED NATIONS - NATIONS UNIES International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Tribunal Pénal International pour l’ex-Yougoslavie ICTY Annual Outreach Report 2012 ICTY Annual Outreach Report 2012 A publicati on of the Outreach Programme, Registry, ICTY Editor in Chief: Nerma Jelačić Contents Editor: Magdalena Spalińska Contents Manager: Rada Pejić-Sremac and Petar Finci Graphics Editor: Leslie Hondebrink-Hermer Photographs: The ICTY Outreach Programme, Leslie Hondebrink-Hermer and Zoran Lešić Contributors: Francesca Bowen, Helena Eggleston, Joanna Ellis Adwan, Aleksandar Konti ć, Frederik Swinnen, Ljiljana Piteša and Carline Ameerali Proofreading: Nicholas Beston, Joanna Ellis Adwan Circulati on: 1,000 copies Printed in The Netherlands, 2013 Table of Contents Foreword by the ICTY President ................................................. 3 Outreach Programme of the ICTY ............................................. 5 Youth Outreach .......................................................................................... 7 Media Outreach ...................................................................................... 13 Community Outreach ........................................................................ 19 Capacity Building ................................................................................... 25 Annexes .......................................................................................................... 29 Annex I: Stati sti cs ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From Head to Tale: Understanding Yugoslav Socialism Through Zoomorphism in Contemporary Satire
    From Head to Tale: Understanding Yugoslav Socialism through Zoomorphism in Contemporary Satire Jelena Sofronijevic, University of Edinburgh Key words: Yugoslav Socialism, Satire, Zoomorphism, Arts and Politics, Critical Theory, Popular Complicity Existing histories of socialist Yugoslavia (1945-1992) rarely address the contemporary experience of the regime.1 Party-institutional organs privileged economic data and elite administration above citizens’ thoughts, values, and emotions in defining state histories (Patterson, 2011: 14). Furthermore, traditional political analysis often disregards contemporary art as subjective, context- specific, or emotionally-determined (Nussbaum, 1983: 23-50; Davies, 2001: 347-348; Mrovlje, 2019: 164). Yet, unlike state-driven narratives, contemporary art and literature can articulate a plurality of situated perspectives and lived experiences of the historical past (Barthes, 1977: 79; Schiff, 2014: 1- 2). Art thus contributes to understanding and constructing meaning in immediate and distant communities. Drawing from Yugoslavia’s traditions of critical art, dark humour, and the short story form, I study how contemporary satirists used zoomorphism to publicly grapple with Yugoslav socialism. Zoomorphism here refers to the portrayal of humans as non-human animals; this broad understanding subsumes animalisation, as the description of human characteristics in animal terms (Garrard, 2012: 153-155; Parry, 2017: 41-44). I select four Yugoslav satires first published in the 1950s-1960s, and later in translation: Vladimir ‘Vlada’ Bulatović-Vib’s ‘The Shark and the Bureaucrat’ and ‘The Municipal Whale’ (both 1950s-1960s, trans. 1966); Erih Koš’ novella The Strange Story of the Great Whale, Also Known as Big Mac (Big Mac) (1956, trans. 1962), and; Josip ‘Joža’ Horvat’s ‘Mousehole’ (1962, trans.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Tito-Stalin Split to Yugoslavia's Finnish Connection: Neutralism Before Non-Alignment, 1948-1958
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: FROM THE TITO-STALIN SPLIT TO YUGOSLAVIA'S FINNISH CONNECTION: NEUTRALISM BEFORE NON-ALIGNMENT, 1948-1958. Rinna Elina Kullaa, Doctor of Philosophy 2008 Directed By: Professor John R. Lampe Department of History After the Second World War the European continent stood divided between two clearly defined and competing systems of government, economic and social progress. Historians have repeatedly analyzed the formation of the Soviet bloc in the east, the subsequent superpower confrontation, and the resulting rise of Euro-Atlantic interconnection in the west. This dissertation provides a new view of how two borderlands steered clear of absorption into the Soviet bloc. It addresses the foreign relations of Yugoslavia and Finland with the Soviet Union and with each other between 1948 and 1958. Narrated here are their separate yet comparable and, to some extent, coordinated contests with the Soviet Union. Ending the presumed partnership with the Soviet Union, the Tito-Stalin split of 1948 launched Yugoslavia on a search for an alternative foreign policy, one that previously began before the split and helped to provoke it. After the split that search turned to avoiding violent conflict with the Soviet Union while creating alternative international partnerships to help the Communist state to survive in difficult postwar conditions. Finnish-Soviet relations between 1944 and 1948 showed the Yugoslav Foreign Ministry that in order to avoid invasion, it would have to demonstrate a commitment to minimizing security risks to the Soviet Union along its European political border and to not interfering in the Soviet domination of domestic politics elsewhere in Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]