Project Report 21/10/2014 – 27/11/2019 Contribution Agreement FED/2014/346-851

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project Report 21/10/2014 – 27/11/2019 Contribution Agreement FED/2014/346-851 Project Report 21/10/2014 – 27/11/2019 Contribution Agreement FED/2014/346-851 ACP-EU Development Minerals Programme Implemented in Partnership with UNDP www.developmentminerals.org Project Report (21 October 2014 – 27 November 2019) Contribution Agreement FED/2014/346-851 For ease of cross reference and in-line with European Commission requirements this Project Report follows the structure of the ‘Description of the Action’ that appears as Annex 1 of the Contribution Agreement. Copyright © 2019 by the United Nations Development Programme UNDP Brussels Boulevard du Régent 37 Brussels, Belgium Tel. : +32 2 505 46 20 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.developmentminerals.org Cover design: Ana Beatriz Dominguez Organero Photo Credit: Daniel M. Franks/ ACP-EU Development Minerals Programme. StoneChange 2016 International Conference, Carrara, Italy. About the ACP-EU Development Minerals Programme: The ACP-EU Development Minerals Programme is an initiative of African, Caribbean Pacific (ACP) Group of States, coordinated by the ACP Secretariat, financed by the European Commission and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and implemented by UNDP. This €13.1 million capacity building program aims to build the profile and improve the management of Development Minerals in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific. The sector includes the mining of industrial minerals, construction materials, dimension stones and semi-precious stones. Table of Contents SECTION I: INTRODUCTION TO THE PROGRAMME ........................................................4 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACTION.....................................................................................4 PROGRAMME OBJECTIVES..............................................................................................6 COUNTRY COVERAGE .....................................................................................................8 SECTION II: THE STRATEGY ..........................................................................................10 THE CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT APPROACH.................................................................10 TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS ...........................................................................................12 STRUCTURED BUSINESS ACCELERATION STRATEGY................................................15 SECTION III: PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................18 COUNTRY SELECTION ...................................................................................................18 INCEPTION WORKSHOP .................................................................................................21 SECTOR ASSESSMENTS AND CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT ROADMAPS ......................22 PARTICIPANT SELECTION ..............................................................................................37 TRAINING, COUCHING AND SECTOR PROMOTION ......................................................38 FINAL WORKSHOP ........................................................................................................ 108 SECTION IV: PROGRAMME IMPACT............................................................................. 110 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ................................................................................................... 110 FOCUS COUNTRY IMPACT ........................................................................................... 117 INSTITUTION/ORGANIZATION LEVEL IMPACT ............................................................ 129 APPENDIX I: MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS .......................................................... 139 PROGRAMME STEERING COMMITTEE ........................................................................ 139 TECHNICAL COMMITTEE .............................................................................................. 140 COUNTRY WORKING GROUPS .................................................................................... 141 UNDP PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT TEAM ................................................................. 142 MONITORING AND EVALUATION.................................................................................. 142 RESULTS AND RESOURCES FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 142 APPENDIX II. RESPONDING TO IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES ............................ 157 APPENDIX III. REVISED WORKPLAN OCT 2014 – NOV 2019 ....................................... 159 APPENDIX IV: FINANCIAL STATEMENT........................................................................ 165 APPENDIX V: COMMUNICATION & VISIBILITY ............................................................. 166 SECTION I: INTRODUCTION TO THE PROGRAMME Brief Description of Action The ACP-EU Development Minerals Programme1 is a €13.2 million initiative of the ACP Group of States, coordinated by the ACP Secretariat, financed by the European Union and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and implemented by UNDP. The programme has been under implementation over a five-year period since October 2014. The Programme aims to build the capacity of stakeholders in the Development Minerals sector (focusing on industrial minerals like gypsum and salt; construction materials like sand and gravel; dimension stones like marble and granite; and semi-precious stones like garnet and tourmaline). These minerals and materials are mined, processed, manufactured and used domestically in industries such as construction, manufacturing, infrastructure and agriculture. The demand for Development Minerals is driven by rapid urbanization, infrastructure development, industrialization and post-disaster reconstruction in ACP countries. In contrast to the metals sector, the domestic production, processing and use of Development Minerals make them economically significant to local communities in generating jobs, with a greater impact on poverty reduction. This is partly because the sector is dominated by small and medium-scale domestic enterprises. The private sector in the ACP region plays a key role in accelerating sustainable and inclusive economic growth while reducing poverty. This is achieved by creating new jobs and providing income for employees and households. For instance, in developing countries, such as those in the ACP region, the private sector generates 90% of jobs; funds 60% of all investments and provides more than 80% of government revenues. It is, therefore, a vital sector for combating poverty, reducing inequalities and redistributing the benefits of economic growth. The EU recognizes the enormous potential of the private sector in driving sustainable and inclusive economic growth, job creation, and reducing poverty. It is against this backdrop that the EU is implementing strategies for private sector engagement in development processes through the EU’s Joint Communication on a Renewed Partnership with the Countries of Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific JOIN (2016)52 final; the ACP-EU Cooperative Framework for Private Sector Development in ACP Countries; and the EU Communication A Stronger Role of the Private Sector in Achieving Inclusive and Sustainable Growth in Developing Countries COM (2014)263 final. Furthermore, the recently unveiled External Investment Plan (EIP) by the EU aims to promote inclusive growth, job creation and sustainable development. Each of the strategies aims to improve the business and investment climate through support for the creation of an enabling business environment; improved access to finance; support to the 1 The ACP-EU Development Minerals Programme is the short title of the Programme agreed upon by the Programme Steering Committee (EU, ACP Secretariat and UNDP) in November 2015. This short title will be used through-out the report in reference to the project. informal private sector to transition to the formal economy; development of local enterprises that are equipped to create decent jobs, generate public revenues, as well as harness trade and investment opportunities. Nearly two-thirds of the 79 ACP States are either mining countries or have mining potential, which, if exploited rationally, could contribute to inclusive and sustainable socio-economic development. Against this backdrop, a Framework of Action (FWA) on the Development of Mineral Resources Sector was endorsed by the ACP Group of States in October 2011 with the overall objective of fostering the development of the mineral resources industry, which in turn is expected to enhance sustainable development and poverty reduction in ACP countries. The specific objectives of the Framework are to strengthen the management capacity of ACP countries in the mineral sector, to integrate sustainable development measures into mining and to enhance the ability of states to derive maximum economic and social benefits from the sector while mitigating the negative social and environmental impacts of the mining industry. The vision of the ACP Group of States, as presented in the document Towards the ACP we want is “to become the leading transcontinental organization working in solidarity to improve the living standards of our peoples through South-South and North-South Cooperation”. The Group’s mission is to accelerate the political, economic and social advancement of people in the ACP region through good governance, poverty eradication, promotion of trade, sustainable development and equitable integration into the world economy. One critical avenue to achieve the above vision is through the development of the private
Recommended publications
  • MCSP Guinea Restoration of Health Services, March 2017
    MCSP Guinea Restoration of Health Services, March 2017 MCSP/Rachel Waxman Guinea–Selected Demographic and Health Indicators Indicator Data Indicator Data Indicator Data TFR (births per Population (1) 10,628,972 5.1 Pneumonia (2) 38% woman) (2) CPR (modern 36.5% / Live births/year (3) 368,558 5% ORS / Zinc (2) methods) (2) 0.5% Ebola infections MMR (per 100,000 724 ANC +4 (2) 56.6% during recent 3,804 live births) (2) epidemic (4) Ebola death rate NMR (per 1,000 live (percentage of 34 SBA (2) 45.3% 66% births) (2) infections ending in death)(4) U5MR (per 1,000 live 94 DTP3 (3) 51% births) (2) Sources: (1) 2014 National Census; (2) DHS 2012; (3) WHO UNICEF 2015 coverage estimate; (4) WHO Ebola Situation Report, December 2015. Strategic Objectives: Restoration of Health Services Program At least 80% of MCSP-supported hospitals and health centers (n=221) meet minimum IPC standards. 34 facilities supported to reinvigorate and maintain the SBM-R process, with at least 80% achieving and/or maintaining recognition of performance. 75% of target facilities in the 20 focus prefectures have increased capacity to offer RMNCH services (of 26 hospitals and 195 health centers). 96 health posts supported to improve IMNCI and contribute to the care of sick children in the catchment areas of 30 health centers (revised target). 700 community health workers (ASC) are supported to reinvigorate community health and mobilization to provide health information, accompaniment of pregnant women, and FP services, as well as key lifesaving interventions; and to increase community ownership and capacity to explore, plan, and act together for improved RMNCH outcomes in communities surrounding 20 MCSP-supported health centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal Report Kankan-Kouremale-Bamako Road Multinational Guinea-Mali
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND ZZZ/PTTR/2000/01 Language: English Original: French APPRAISAL REPORT KANKAN-KOUREMALE-BAMAKO ROAD MULTINATIONAL GUINEA-MALI COUNTRY DEPARTMENT OCDW WEST REGION JANUARY 1999 SCCD : N.G. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PROJECT INFORMATION BRIEF, EQUIVALENTS, ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS, LIST OF ANNEXES AND TABLES, BASIC DATA, PROJECT LOGICAL FRAMEWORK, ANALYTICAL SUMMARY i-ix 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Genesis and Background.................................................................................... 1 1.2 Performance of Similar Projects..................................................................................... 2 2 THE TRANSPORT SECTOR ........................................................................................... 3 2.1 The Transport Sector in the Two Countries ................................................................... 3 2.2 Transport Policy, Planning and Coordination ................................................................ 4 2.3 Transport Sector Constraints.......................................................................................... 4 3 THE ROAD SUB-SECTOR .............................................................................................. 5 3.1 The Road Network ......................................................................................................... 5 3.2 The Automobile Fleet and Traffic.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea: Reference Map of Faranah Prefecture (As of 05 March 2015)
    Guinea: Reference Map of Faranah Prefecture (as of 05 March 2015) Kalinko SENEGAL MALI GUINEA Sélouma BISSAU GUINEA Komola Koura COTE D'IVOIRE SIERRA LEONE Dialakoro Kankama LIBERIA Sisséla Sanguiana Bissikirima Regional Capital District Capital Dabola Arfamoussayah Sub District Capital Banko Kounendou Village Dogomet N'demba Unpaved runway Paved runway Region boundaries Koulambo District boundaries Morigbeya Dar Es Salam Daro Gada Walan Sub District boundaries Kindoyé DIGUILA CENTRE Fabouya TOUMANIA CENTRE Boubouya Main roads Yombo Nialen Moria Dansoya Secondary roads NIENOUYA CENTRE Teliayaga Doukou Passaya Souriya Mansira Moribaya KONDEBOU KASSA BOUNA CENTRE Tambaya Rivers Foya Gadha Mongoli Babakadia Hafia Gomboya BELEYA CENTRE SABERE KALIA Keema SOUNGBANYA CENTRE Balandou Beindougou SANSANKO CENTRE Sidakoro Gueagbely Gueafari Sokora District (Préfectures) Harounaya Miniandala Badhi Gnentin Oussouya Banire Wolofouga Lamiya Gueagbely Mameyire SANSAMBOU CENTRE BIRISSA CENTRE NGUENEYA CENTRE NIAKO CENTRE Koumandi Koura Dabola Wassakaria Kobalen Bingal Dansoya Tomata Konkofaya Heredou Marela karimbou Sansamba Bouran SOLOYA CENTRE Kolmatamba KOUMANDI KORO Sanamoussaya MILIDALA CENTRE Banfele Labatara Gninantamba BONTALA Koura Sambouya DIANA CENTRE Sansando Faranah Wossekalia FRIGUIA CENTRE MAGNA Halossagoya KALIA CENTRE I KOMBONYA Ballayany Herewa Alia Filly Fore Sakoromaya SOLONYEREYA Khamaya Bindou Dansaya Koutamodiya Salia Kamako Kissidougou Goulouya Fantoumaniya Nerekoro SEREKORO CENTRE Guidonya Kombonyady Wassambala Balankhamba Kabaya
    [Show full text]
  • AEMIP Quarterly Progress Report OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2014
    Agriculture Education and Market Improvement Program (AEMIP) AEMIP Quarterly Progress Report OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2014 Submitted by: AEMIP Winrock International ISAV/F Campus Faranah, Guinea January 31st, 2015 AEMIP is funded by USAID Cooperative Agreement No. AID-675-A-13-00003, as an Associate Award under the Farmer-to-Farmer LWA Cooperative Agreement No.EDH-00-0900003-00. Contact AEMIP Andrew Kovarik, Program Director ISAV/F Campus Faranah, Guinea +224-62-082-0 433 [email protected] Winrock International AEMIP Quarterly Progress Report (October-December 2014) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................................iii I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY–QUARTER OVERVIEW ........................................................... 2 II. WORK PLAN PROGRESS –STATUS OF PLANNED ACTIVITIES ................................ 5 A. Status of Planned Activities Year 2 ...................................................................................................................... 5 B. Discussion of planned activities that are delayed, postponed or cancelled, or unplanned activities that took place ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 III. ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....................................................................................................... 16 A. Activities implemented .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Omvg Energy Project Countries
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP PROJECT : OMVG ENERGY PROJECT COUNTRIES : MULTINATIONAL GAMBIA - GUINEA- GUINEA BISSAU - SENEGAL SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Team Members: Mr. A.B. DIALLO, Chief Energy Engineer, ONEC.1 Mr. P. DJAIGBE, Principal Financial Analyst, ONEC.1/SNFO Mr. K. HASSAMAL, Economist, ONEC.1 Mrs. S.MAHIEU, Socio-Economist, ONEC.1 Mrs. S.MAIGA, Procurement Officer, ORPF.1/SNFO Mr. O. OUATTARA, Financial Management Expert, ORPF.2/SNFO Mr. A.AYASI SALAWOU, Legal Consultant, GECL.1 Project Team Mr. M.L. KINANE, Principal Environmentalist ONEC.3 Mr. S. BAIOD, Environmentalist, ONEC.3 Mr. H.P. SANON, Socio-Economist, ONEC.3 Sector Director: Mr. A.RUGUMBA, Director, ONEC Regional Director: Mr. J.K. LITSE, Acting Director, ORWA Division Manager: Mr. A.ZAKOU, Division Manager, ONEC.1, 1 OMVG ENERGY PROJECT Summary of ESIA Project Name : OMVG ENERGY PROJECT Country : MULTINATIONAL GAMBIA - GUINEA- GUINEA BISSAU - SENEGAL Project Ref. Number : PZ1-FAO-018 Department : ONEC Division: ONEC 1 1. INTRODUCTION This paper is the summary of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) of the OMVG Project, which was prepared in July 2014. This summary was drafted in accordance with the environmental requirements of the four OMVG countries and the African Development Bank’s Integrated Safeguards System for Category 1 projects. It starts with a presentation of the project description and rationale, followed by the legal and institutional frameworks of the four countries. Next, a description of the main environmental conditions of the project is presented along with project options which are compared in terms of technical, economic and social feasibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance System Assessment in Guinea: Training Needed to Strengthen Data Quality and Analysis, 2016
    PLOS ONE RESEARCH ARTICLE Surveillance system assessment in Guinea: Training needed to strengthen data quality and analysis, 2016 1 1 1,2 1,2 Doreen Collins , Sarah RheaID *, Boubacar Ibrahima Diallo , Mariama Boubacar Bah , Facinet Yattara3, Rachelle Goman Keleba4, Pia D. M. MacDonald1,5 1 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America, 2 RTI International, Conakry, Guinea, 3 Guinea Ministry of Health, Conakry, Guinea, 4 International Organization for Migration, Boffa, Guinea, 5 Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North a1111111111 Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract The 2014±2016 Ebola virus disease outbreak revealed the fragility of the Guinean public health infrastructure. As a result, the Guinean Ministry of Health is collaborating with interna- OPEN ACCESS tional partners to improve compliance with the International Health Regulations and work Citation: Collins D, Rhea S, Diallo BI, Bah MB, Yattara F, Keleba RG, et al. (2020) Surveillance toward the Global Health Security Agenda goals, including enhanced case- and community- system assessment in Guinea: Training needed to based disease surveillance. We assessed the case-based disease surveillance system strengthen data quality and analysis, 2016. PLoS during October 1, 2015±March 31, 2016, in the Boffa prefecture of Guinea. We conducted ONE 15(6): e0234796. https://doi.org/10.1371/ onsite interviews
    [Show full text]
  • 2.3.16 Guinea Border Crossing of Heremakonon
    2.3.16 Guinea Border Crossing of Heremakonon Overview Daily Capacity Customs Clearance Other Relevant Information Overview Hérémakonon is a town and sub-prefecture in the Faranah Prefecture in the Faranah Region of Guinea. As of 2014 it had a population of 12,890 people. The road is not paved and it is very difficult to access during the rainy season. BORDER CROSSING LOCATION & CONTACT Name of Border Crossing Heremakonon [Guinea] Gberia Fotombu [Sierra Leone] Province or District Nzerekore / Faranah Nearest Town or City Faranah 44 km Latitude 9.718564 Longitude -11.00049 Managing Authority/Agency Customs Authority Contact Person N/A Travel Times Nearest International Airport Gbessia International Airport 420 km Truck: 8 hours Car: 6 hours Nearest Port Port Autonome of Conakry 430 km Truck: 8 hours Car: 6 hours Nearest Major Market Faranah 44 km Truck: 2 hours Car: 1 hour Other Information There are no weighing bridges en-route. Hours of Operation MONDAYS 0800 - 1830 TUESDAYS 0800 - 1830 WEDNESDAYS 0800 - 1830 THURSDAYS 0800 - 1830 Page 1 FRIDAYS 0800 - 1830 SATURDAYS 0800 - 1830 SUNDAYS 0800 - 1830 NATIONAL HOLIDAYS 0800 - 1830 SEASONAL CONSTRAINTS Rainy season Daily Capacity The borders were closed during the Ebola outbreak in 2014/2015. Private cars are not provided a separate lane. Customs Clearance In order to obtain a customs clearance, all the documents should be prepared and approved by the Customs authority in Conakry, then transmitted to the regional customs office respectively. A copy should be made available at the border post by the requester/transporter. The waybill and commercial invoice are the main documents requested by the customs at the border.
    [Show full text]
  • MCHIP Guinea End-Of-Project Report October 2010–June 2014
    MCHIP Guinea End-of-Project Report October 2010–June 2014 Submitted on: September 15, 2014 Submitted to: United States Agency for International Development under Coooperative Agreement # GHS-A-00-08-00002-000 Submitted by: Yolande Hyjazi, Rachel Waxman and Bethany Arnold 1 The Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP) is the USAID Bureau for Global Health’s flagship maternal, neonatal and child health (MNCH) program. MCHIP supports programming in maternal, newborn and child health, immunization, family planning, malaria, nutrition, and HIV/AIDS, and strongly encourages opportunities for integration. Cross-cutting technical areas include water, sanitation, hygiene, urban health and health systems strengthening. MCHIP brings together a partnership of organizations with demonstrated success in reducing maternal, newborn and child mortality rates and malnutrition. Each partner will take the lead in developing programs around specific technical areas: Jhpiego, as the Prime, will lead maternal health, family planning/reproductive health, and prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT); JSI—child health, immunization, and pediatric AIDS; Save the Children—newborn health, community interventions for MNCH, and community mobilization; PATH—nutrition and health technology; JHU/IIP—research and evaluation; Broad Branch—health financing; PSI—social marketing; and ICF International—continues support for the Child Survival and Health Grants Program (CSHGP) and the Malaria Communities Program (MCP). This report was made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), under the terms of the Leader with Associates Cooperative Agreement GHS-A-00-08-00002-00. The contents are the responsibility of the Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP) and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • West Africa – Ebola Outbreak Fact Sheet #23, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2015 March 4, 2015
    WEST AFRICA – EBOLA OUTBREAK FACT SHEET #23, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2015 MARCH 4, 2015 NUMBERS AT HIGHLIGHTS USG HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE A GLANCE TO EVD OUTBREAK RESPONSE WHO reports 132 new confirmed cases of TO DATE IN FY 2014 & FY 2015 EVD in Guinea and Sierra Leone in the 23,934 week ending on March 1. USAID/OFDA1 $463,846,949 No new EVD cases confirmed in Liberia USAID/FFP2 $57,479,546 Number of Suspected, in nearly two weeks. Probable, and Confirmed USAID/GH3 $20,076,000 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) Response actors remain concerned Cases in Acutely Affected regarding ongoing EVD transmission USAID/Liberia $16,100,000 Countries* chains in Guinea’s Forécariah Prefecture, USAID/Guinea $3,482,000 UN World Health Organization where 23 EVD cases since February 28— (WHO) – DoD4 $353,958,000 March 4, 2015 more than 70 percent of the 32 confirmed cases in the same time period CDC5 $131,455,1156 countrywide—have occurred. 9,792 $1,046,397,610 Number of EVD-Related USG ASSISTANCE TO THE WEST AFRICA 7 Deaths* EVD OUTBREAK RESPONSE WHO – March 4, 2015 KEY DEVELOPMENTS 11,466 As of March 3, the Government of Liberia (GoL) Incident Management System (IMS) had Number of EVD Cases in not reported a confirmed case of EVD in 12 days, with the most recent case documented in Sierra Leone* Montserrado County on February 19. On February 27, the IMS announced that Liberia had WHO – March 4, 2015 entered Phase 3 of the EVD response, which will focus on restoring non-EVD health services and improving triage and referral processes to enable medical staff to safely identify and isolate suspect EVD cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
    REPUBLIC OF GUINEA Work – Justice – Solidarity Ministry of the Economy, Finances and Planning Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper PRSP–2 (2007–2010) Conakry, August 2007 Permanent Secretariat for the Poverty Reduction Strategy (SP-SRP) Website: www.srp-guinee.org.Telephone: (00224) 30 43 10 80. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document is the fruit of a collective effort that has involved many development stakeholders: executives of regionalized and decentralized structures, civil society organizations, development partners, etc. Warm thanks to all of them. The government would particularly like to acknowledge the grassroots organizations and civil society actors who, despite the difficulties that affected the implementation of the PRSP-I, have renewed their confidence in its action. The lessons learned from the implementation of the PRSP-I have helped in the design and preparation of the document. For this, the government again thanks the development partners who have accompanied it in this exercise and provided technical and financial contributions (EU, GTZ, SCAC, Canadian Cooperation), as well as the team of national experts who carried out field work with dedication and professionalism. Furthermore, without the painstaking work carried out in 2005 and 2006 as part of the process of refining the regional PRSPs, it certainly would not have been possible to prepare this document. The same is true of the work done, mainly in 2006, to evaluate needs aimed at reaching the MDGs. In this regard, we thank the United Nations System, and in particular the UNDP, for its exceptional contribution. Finally, the government extends its most sincere thanks to all those, both named and unnamed, who participated in this collective work.
    [Show full text]
  • Elements De La Carte Sanitaire Des Etablissements De Soins Du Secteur Public
    REPUBLIQUE DE GUINEE ----------------- Travail - Justice - Solidarité MINISTERE DE LA SANTE PUBLIQUE ELEMENTS DE LA CARTE SANITAIRE DES ETABLISSEMENTS DE SOINS DU SECTEUR PUBLIC JANVIER 2012 TABLE DES MATIERES CHAPITRE I : SITUATION ACTUELLE DES ETABL ISSEMENTS DE SOINS ............................................. 4 I - TYPOLOGIE ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 II - NIVEAU PRIMAIRE ............................................................................................................................................ 4 III - NIVEAU SECONDAIRE ..................................................................................................................................... 7 IV - NIVEAU TERTIAIRE ........................................................................................................................................ 10 V - POINTS FAIBLES .............................................................................................................................................. 12 VI - POINTS FORTS ................................................................................................................................................ 13 VII - CONTRAINTES ............................................................................................................................................... 13 VIII - OPPORTUNITES ET MENACES ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ebola Transmission Prevention & Survivor Services: Country Program
    Advancing Partners & Communities Ebola Transmission Prevention & Survivor Services: Country Program in Review Guinea October 2018 Eidolon Advancing Partners & Communities Ebola Transmission Prevention & Survivor Services: Country Program in Review Guinea Implemented in partnership with: Kate Litvin ADVANCING PARTNERS & COMMUNITIES Advancing Partners & Communities (APC) is a cooperative agreement funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development under Agreement No. AID- OAA-A-12-00047, beginning October 1, 2012. APC is implemented by JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., in collaboration with FHI 360. The project focuses on advanc- ing and supporting community programs that seek to improve the overall health of communities and achieve other health-related impacts, especially in relationship to family planning. APC provides global leadership for community-based programming, executes and manages small- and medium-sized sub-awards, supports procurement reform by preparing awards for execution by USAID, and builds technical capacity of organizations to implement effective programs. RECOMMENDED CITATION Advancing Partners & Communities. 2018. Ebola Transmission Prevention & Survivor Services: Country Program in Review, Guinea. Arlington, VA: Advancing Partners & Communities. Cover photo: Eidolon JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE, INC. 1616 Fort Myer Drive, 16th Floor Arlington, VA 22209, USA Phone: 703-528-7474 Fax: 703-528-7480 Email: [email protected] Web: advancingpartners.org This publication was produced by Advancing Partners
    [Show full text]