DOCSLIB.ORG

Te Hokinga Mai O Ngā Tūpuna

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Te Hokinga Mai O Ngā Tūpuna Te Hokinga Mai O Ngā Tūpuna: Māori Perspectives of Repatriation and the Scientific Research of Ancestral Remains Amber Kiri Aranui A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Māori Studies Victoria University of Wellington 2018 Waerea waerea i raro i a Rangi e tū nei, Waerea waerea i runga i a Papa e takoto nei Waerea i runga i nga maru o wehi, Kia tū tangatanga mātaki e Tāne-pēpēke-o-te-wao, Whano whano haramai te toki, Haumi e, hui e, tāiki e! 2 Waiho kia tangi ahau ki taku tūpāpaku, Kāpā he uru ti e piki ake Let me weep for my dead, it is not like the head of the ti tree which when cut springs up again (Mead and Grove 2004: 418) 3 Abstract The repatriation of human remains has been the subject of much discussion and debate, especially since the 1990s. Since then, there has been a marked increase in the international literature relating to museums, indigenous peoples and repatriation; however, this literature is mainly written from the perspective of museums and universities. Although there has been some publication of the views on repatriation of indigenous communities there is a conspicuous absence of Māori perspectives in this literature. In particular, there is a lack of Māori voice on the repatriation of ancestral remains, as well as a lack of commentary on the so-called scientific research on ancestral remains that has taken place, and continues to take place, in universities, museums, and medical institutions around the world. This lack of indigenous perspective in the repatriation literature has resulted in mainstream assumptions about why indigenous communities, such as Māori, have been so active in repatriation activities over the last 25 years. The assumptions have tended to view the motives of indigenous peoples as politically motivated and even go as far as describing them as “activist” in nature rather than motivated by cultural beliefs and imperatives. This perceived view, as well as the views of many writers in the scientific and museum professions who do not agree with the repatriation of human remains back to origin communities because of their “loss to science” and therefore humankind, has prompted hotly contested debates concerning these issues. These contested views lead inevitably to the question of consent and whether the taking of skeletal remains from burial contexts to carry out ‘scientific’ research without consent is deemed ethical by today’s standards. The primary aim of this thesis is to document Māori perspectives on the repatriation of ancestral human remains and to understand the significance of Māori ancestral human remains for descendant communities. A secondary aim is to review some of the scientific research which has been carried out on Māori ancestral remains, and to identify the benefits, if any, of that research for descendant communities. 4 Mihi | Acknowledgement First and foremost, I want to thank my whānau, especially my daughter and mother, for supporting me through this journey, for giving me the space I need to just write, and for allowing me the freedom to follow my dreams. I would like to thank my supervisors Associate Professor Peter Adds and Dr Maria Bargh for all their time and support and for giving me the opportunity to write about something I am passionate about. To Terese McLeod and Jeremy Porima for being an incredible support system over the past five years, and for allowing me space to vent. To Dr Arapata Hakiwai and Sean Mallon for their time and advice throughout this process. To Martin Lewis for being my saviour in tracking down any and every publication I needed. To Nicola Kiri Smith for all her support in helping me to get this thesis done, you are my hero. To Aunty Polly, Rose Mohi, Bayden Barber, Āwhina Twomey, Simon Hirini, Derek Lardelli, Anaru Moke, Dr Hallie Buckley, Beatrice Hudson, Professor Lisa Matisoo-Smith, and Dr Judith Littleton for their time and sharing with me their stories and perspectives. To Aroha Mead for her sound advice and guidance. And last but by no means least, to Te Arikirangi Mamaku, for being my all-around support over the last nine years. I could not have completed this thesis without the combined support and input of all of you, I am eternally grateful. This thesis is dedicated to all the tūpuna who are yet to come home, you are not forgotten. Ngā mihi nui ki a koutou. 5 Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 4 Mihi | Acknowledgement ............................................................................................. 5 Contents ..................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... 9 Background ........................................................................................................................... 9 Literature Review ............................................................................................................... 12 Researching Māori .......................................................................................................... 12 Repatriation Development and Debate ......................................................................... 16 Repatriation and the Indigenous voice .......................................................................... 17 Repatriation and Māori .................................................................................................. 20 The Ethics of Repatriation and Scientific Research .................................................... 22 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 23 Theoretical Framework ..................................................................................................... 24 Research Design .................................................................................................................. 27 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 29 Qualitative Interviews ..................................................................................................... 32 Case Studies ..................................................................................................................... 33 Thesis outline....................................................................................................................... 34 PART ONE: HISTORICAL ANALYSIS ................................................................... 37 1. A History of the Acquisition of Māori Ancestral Remains 1770–1980 ................... 37 Early Acquisition of Tūpuna Māori.................................................................................. 37 The Acquisition and Trade of Toi moko .......................................................................... 39 The Theft and Exchange of Kōiwi Tangata Māori .......................................................... 42 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 48 2. A History of Scientific Interest in Māori Ancestral Remains in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries ................................................................................................. 51 Darwinian influences .......................................................................................................... 51 Visiting Scientists ................................................................................................................ 54 Military Studies of Crania ................................................................................................. 59 Science in New Zealand ...................................................................................................... 59 Māori as a Dying Race ....................................................................................................... 61 6 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 62 3. Scientific Research on Māori Ancestral Remains in the Late Twentieth and Twenty- first Centuries ........................................................................................................... 65 The Rise of Physical Anthropology in New Zealand ....................................................... 66 Wairau Bar Discovery and Excavation ............................................................................ 71 Wairau Bar Return and Reburial ..................................................................................... 76 Māori and Moriori Dental Morphology ........................................................................... 80 Auckland Airport Runway Development ......................................................................... 84 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 90 4. Indigenous Repatriation and Academic Responses: An Overview ........................ 93 Case Study One: Kanaka Maoli—Intellectual Savagery versus Ohana ....................... 94 Case Study Two: Kanak—A Fight for Sovereignty ........................................................ 97 Case Study Three: Sámi—Recognition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unsettling a Settler Family's History in Aotearoa New Zealand
    genealogy Article A Tale of Two Stories: Unsettling a Settler Family’s History in Aotearoa New Zealand Richard Shaw Politics Programme, Massey University, PB 11 222 Palmerston North, New Zealand; [email protected]; Tel.: +64-27609-8603 Abstract: On the morning of the 5 November 1881, my great-grandfather stood alongside 1588 other military men, waiting to commence the invasion of Parihaka pa,¯ home to the great pacifist leaders Te Whiti o Rongomai and Tohu Kakahi¯ and their people. Having contributed to the military campaign against the pa,¯ he returned some years later as part of the agricultural campaign to complete the alienation of Taranaki iwi from their land in Aotearoa New Zealand. None of this detail appears in any of the stories I was raised with. I grew up Pakeh¯ a¯ (i.e., a descendant of people who came to Aotearoa from Europe as part of the process of colonisation) and so my stories tend to conform to orthodox settler narratives of ‘success, inevitability, and rights of belonging’. This article is an attempt to right that wrong. In it, I draw on insights from the critical family history literature to explain the nature, purposes and effects of the (non)narration of my great-grandfather’s participation in the military invasion of Parihaka in late 1881. On the basis of a more historically comprehensive and contextualised account of the acquisition of three family farms, I also explore how the control of land taken from others underpinned the creation of new settler subjectivities and created various forms of privilege that have flowed down through the generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 26 | Number 1 | 2014
    Pacific-AsianVolume Education 26 –| Vol.Number 26, No. 1 11 | 2014 Pacific-Asian Education The Journal of the Pacific Circle Consortium for Education Volume 26, Number 1, 2014 ISSUE EDITOR Elizabeth Rata, The University of Auckland EDITOR Elizabeth Rata, School of Critical Studies in Education, Faculty of Education, The University of Auckland, New Zealand. Email: [email protected] EXECUTIVE EDITORS Kirsten Locke, The University of Auckland, New Zealand Elizabeth Rata, The University of Auckland, New Zealand Alexis Siteine, The University of Auckland, New Zealand CONSULTING EDITOR Michael Young, Institute of Education, University of London EDITORIAL BOARD Kerry Kennedy, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong Meesook Kim, Korean Educational Development Institute, South Korea Carol Mutch, Education Review Office, New Zealand Gerald Fry, University of Minnesota, USA Christine Halse, University of Western Sydney, Australia Gary McLean,Texas A & M University, USA Leesa Wheelahan, University of Toronto, Canada Rob Strathdee, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia Xiaoyu Chen, Peking University, P. R. China Saya Shiraishi, The University of Tokyo, Japan Richard Tinning, University of Queensland, Australia Rohit Dhankar, Azim Premji University, Bangalore, India Airini, Thompson Rivers University, British Columbia, Canada ISSN 10109-8725 Pacific Circle Consortium for Education Publication design and layout: Halcyon Design Ltd, www.halcyondesign.co.nz Published by Pacific Circle Consortium for Education http://pacificcircleconsortium.org/PAEJournal.html Pacific-Asian Education Volume 26, Number 1, 2014 CONTENTS Articles The dilemmas and realities of curriculum development: Writing a social studies 5 curriculum for the Republic of Nauru Alexis Siteine Renewal in Samoa: Insights from life skills training 15 David Cooke and T.
    [Show full text]
  • A Community of Contrasts: Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders in Orange County Addresses This Critical Challenge by Doing Two Things
    2014 A COMMUNITY Cyrus Chung Ying Tang Foundation OF CONTRASTS Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders in Orange County ORANGE www.calendow.org COUNTY This report was made possible by the following sponsors: The Wallace H. Coulter Foundation, Cyrus Chung Ying Tang Foundation, Wells Fargo, and The California Endowment. The statements and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. CONTENTS ORGANIZATIONAL DESCRIPTIONS TECHNICAL NOTES Welcome 1 Introduction 2 Executive Summary 3 Map 5 Measuring the characteristics of racial and ethnic groups Demographics 6 Since 2000, the United States Census Bureau has allowed those responding to its questionnaires to report one or more Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Orange County Economic Contributions 9 racial or ethnic backgrounds. While this better reflects America’s diversity and improves data available on multiracial popula- The mission of Asian Americans Advancing Justice (“Advancing Civic Engagement 10 tions, it complicates the use of data on racial and ethnic groups. Justice”) is to promote a fair and equitable society for all by Immigration 12 working for civil and human rights and empowering Asian Language 14 Data on race are generally available from the Census Bureau in two forms, for those of a single racial background (referred Americans and Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders (NHPI) Education 16 to as “alone”) with multiracial people captured in an independent category, and for those of either single or multiple racial and other underserved communities.
    [Show full text]
  • And Taewa Māori (Solanum Tuberosum) to Aotearoa/New Zealand
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Traditional Knowledge Systems and Crops: Case Studies on the Introduction of Kūmara (Ipomoea batatas) and Taewa Māori (Solanum tuberosum) to Aotearoa/New Zealand A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of AgriScience in Horticultural Science at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand Rodrigo Estrada de la Cerda 2015 Kūmara and Taewa Māori, Ōhakea, New Zealand i Abstract Kūmara (Ipomoea batatas) and taewa Māori, or Māori potato (Solanum tuberosum), are arguably the most important Māori traditional crops. Over many centuries, Māori have developed a very intimate relationship to kūmara, and later with taewa, in order to ensure the survival of their people. There are extensive examples of traditional knowledge aligned to kūmara and taewa that strengthen the relationship to the people and acknowledge that relationship as central to the human and crop dispersal from different locations, eventually to Aotearoa / New Zealand. This project looked at the diverse knowledge systems that exist relative to the relationship of Māori to these two food crops; kūmara and taewa. A mixed methodology was applied and information gained from diverse sources including scientific publications, literature in Spanish and English, and Andean, Pacific and Māori traditional knowledge. The evidence on the introduction of kūmara to Aotearoa/New Zealand by Māori is indisputable. Mātauranga Māori confirms the association of kūmara as important cargo for the tribes involved, even detailing the purpose for some of the voyages.
    [Show full text]
  • Chartbook on Healthcare for Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders
    Chartbook on Healthcare for Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY AND DISPARITIES REPORT This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission. Citation of the source is appreciated. Suggested citation: National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report Healthcare for Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; May 2020. AHRQ Pub. No. 20-0043. National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report Chartbook on Healthcare for Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 www.ahrq.gov AHRQ Publication No. 20-0043 May 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report (QDR) is the product of collaboration among agencies across the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Many individuals guided and contributed to this effort. Without their magnanimous support, this chartbook would not have been possible. Specifically, we thank: Authors: • AHRQ: Barbara Barton, Celeste Torio, Bill Freeman, Brenda Harding, Erofile Gripiotis • SAMHSA: Victoria Chau • Health Services Advisory Group (HSAG): Robert Fornango, Paul Niemann, Michael Lichter, Cindy Strickland, Mitchell Keener, Fredericka Thompson Primary AHRQ Staff: Gopal Khanna, David Meyers, Jeff Brady, Francis Chesley, Erin Grace, Kamila Mistry, Celeste Torio, Karen Chaves, Barbara Barton, Bill Freeman, Erofile Gripiotis, Brenda Harding, Irim Azam, Tahleah Chappel, Doreen Bonnett. HHS Interagency Workgroup for the QDR: Irim Azam (AHRQ/CQuIPS), Girma Alemu (HRSA), Doreen Bonnett (AHRQ/OC), Deron Burton (CDC/DDID/NCHHSTP/OD), Victoria Chau (SAMHSA), Karen H. Chaves (AHRQ), Christine Lee (FDA), Deborah Duran (NIH/NIMHD), Ernest Moy (VA), Melissa Evans (CMS/CCSQ), Camille Fabiyi (AHRQ/OEREP), Darryl Gray (AHRQ/CQuIPS), Kirk Greenway (IHS/HQ), Sarah Heppner (HRSA), Edwin D.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Justice, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, and Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders
    Wayne State University Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints WSU Press 10-9-2020 Environmental Justice, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, and Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders Michael S. Spencer University of Washington Taurmini Fentress University of Washington Ammara Touch University of Washington Jessica Hernandez University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol_preprints Recommended Citation Spencer, Michael S.; Fentress, Taurmini; Touch, Ammara; and Hernandez, Jessica, "Environmental Justice, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, and Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders" (2020). Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints. 176. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol_preprints/176 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WSU Press at DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. Environmental Justice, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, and Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders Michael S. Spencer,1,2,* Taurmini Fentress,1 Ammara Touch,3,4 Jessica Hernandez5 1School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 2Indigenous Wellness Research Institute (IWRI), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 3College of the Arts & Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 4College of the Arts & Sciences, Department of American Ethnic Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington USA. 5School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. *Correspondence to: Mike Spencer, University of Washington School of Social Work, Box 354900, Seattle, Washington 98195-4900 USA. E-mail: [email protected]. Short Title: Environmental Justice and Pacific Islanders KEY WORDS: NATIVE HAWAIIAN, PACIFIC ISLANDERS, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE, TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE, SETTLER COLONIALISM.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Archaeology: Introduction
    1 Sharing Archaeology: Introduction Peter Stone I used to stay with Peter Ucko, and his partner Jane Hubert, on my frequent visits to London for work, and in the period between 2003 and 2007 we always discussed Peter’s beloved ‘China Project’. I had been Peter’s PhD student years before in Southampton, and had worked closely with Peter and Jane since the mid 1980s, as we built and nurtured the World Archaeological Congress (WAC) (Ucko 1987, Stone 2006). My visits were a way of keeping in touch and I would always try to arrange meetings so that I could stay with them: we would talk of old times, and my children as they grew up; of how WAC was continuing to develop (during this time I was honorary Chief Executive Officer of WAC while Peter and Jane had stopped having any direct role in the organisation); of how our respective universities were dealing with the rapid changes in UK Higher Education; of our current projects and of our plans for the future. Peter had taught me to think broadly about our subject and that inevitably meant thinking and acting internationally. He constantly wanted to see new places and meet new colleagues, not to teach those elsewhere (frequently in less economically fortunate parts of the world) about so-called ‘best-practice’, but to debate and learn from each other. Given our WAC perspectives, such colleagues were, of course, not only other archaeologists but academics from a wide range of disciplines, as well as indigenous experts and others with an interest in, and knowledge of, the past and its relevance both in the present and to the future.
    [Show full text]
  • 92467102. Robertson
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Chapter 15:Construction of a Paleozoic–Mesozoic accretionary orogen along the active continental margin of SE Gondwana (South Island, New Zealand): summary and overview Citation for published version: Robertson, AHF, Campbell, HJ, Johnston, MR & Palamakumbra, R 2019, Chapter 15:Construction of a Paleozoic–Mesozoic accretionary orogen along the active continental margin of SE Gondwana (South Island, New Zealand): summary and overview. in Introduction to Paleozoic–Mesozoic geology of South Island, New Zealand: subduction-related processes adjacent to SE Gondwana . 1 edn, vol. 49, Geological Society Memoir, Geological Society of London, pp. 331-372. https://doi.org/10.1144/M49.8 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1144/M49.8 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Introduction to Paleozoic–Mesozoic geology of South Island, New Zealand: subduction-related processes adjacent to SE Gondwana Publisher Rights Statement: ©2019TheAuthor(s).ThisisanOpenAccessarticledistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttribution4.0Li cense(http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/). Published by The Geological Society of London. Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    ANNUSKY NETWORKA TLELEVI REPOSION LIMITEDRT JUNE 2013 EVEry Day we’RE ON AN ADVENTURE LESLEY BANKIER FanaticalAS THE about RECEPTIONI Food TV ST I love sweet endings. Whether I’m behind the front desk or attempting recipes from Food TV, I’ll do my best to whip it all into shape and serve it with a smile. COME WITH US EVEry Day we’RE ON AN ADVENTURE FORGING NEW GROUND AND BRINGING CUSTOMERS EXPERIENCES THEY NEVER KNEW EXISTED NADINE WEARING FanaticalAS THE about SENIO SKYR Sport MARKETING EXECUTIVE I’m passionate about getting the right message, to the right person, at the right time. Especially on a Saturday night when the rugby is on SKY Sport. Run it Messam! Straight up the middle! COME WITH US FORGING NEW GROUND AND BRINGING CUSTOMERS EXPERIENCES THEY NEVER KNEW EXISTED TOGETHER WE CAN GO ANYWHERE 7 HIGHLIGHTS 8 CHAIRMAn’S LETTER 10 CHIEF Executive’S REVIEW 14 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 16 BUSINESS OVERVIEW 22 COMMUNITY AND SPONSORSHIP 24 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 30 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 33 2013 FINANCIALS 34 Financial Trends Statement 37 Directors’ Responsibility Statement 38 Income Statement 39 Statement of Comprehensive Income 40 Balance Sheet 41 Statement of Changes in Equity 42 Statement of Cash Flows 43 Notes to the Financial Statements 83 Independent Auditors’ Report 84 OTHER INFORMATION OPENING 86 Corporate Governance Statements 89 Interests Register CREDITS 91 Company and Bondholder Information 95 Waivers and Information 96 Share Market and Other Information 97 Directory 98 SKY Channels SKY Annual Report 2013 6 | HIGHLIGHTS TOTAL REVENUE TOTAL SUBSCRIBERS $885m 855,898 EBITDA ARPU $353m $75.83 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE NET PROFIT $82m $137.2m EMPLOYEES FTEs MY SKY SUBSCRIBERS 1,118 456,419 SKY Annual Report 2013 | 7 “ THE 17-DAY COVERAGE OF THE LONDON OLYMPICS WAS UNPRECEDENTED IN NEW ZEALAND ..
    [Show full text]
  • Rhamnus Alaternus - Environmental Weed on Motutapu and Rangitoto Islands, Auckland
    Tane 36: 57-66 (1997) RHAMNUS ALATERNUS - ENVIRONMENTAL WEED ON MOTUTAPU AND RANGITOTO ISLANDS, AUCKLAND Mairie L. Fromont CI- School of Environmental and Marine Sciences, Tamaki Campus, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland SUMMARY Rhamnus (Rhamnus alaternus) is an environmental weed on the Inner Hauraki Gulf Islands, Auckland. The species has densely colonised coastal slopes of Motutapu Island and invaded unique Metrosideros forest on Rangitoto Island. It can develop dense leafy canopies under which no other plants grow. If left unhindered, rhamnus is likely to smother areas reserved for reforestation in a large restoration programme on Motutapu Island, and progressively replace native plants on Rangitoto Island. Ample seed dispersal of rhamnus is facilitated by common frugivorous birds. Spread of the species is restricted by stock grazing and rabbit browsing, but was probably recently enhanced by the removal of large numbers of possums and wallabies from Motutapu and Rangitoto Islands. Keywords: Rhamnus alaternus; Auckland; Inner Hauraki Gulf; Motutapu Island; Rangitoto Island; weed impact; weed dispersal; browse pressure; weed control strategy. INTRODUCTION Rhamnus (Rhamnus alaternus) also called evergreen, or Italian buckthorn, is a small Mediterranean evergreen tree (Zohary 1962, Tutin et al. 1968, Di Castri 1981). It was sold in New Zealand last century (Hay's Annual Garden Book 1872), but this seems to have been discontinued, as rhamnus is generally not well known as a garden plant in New Zealand today. Rhamnus has naturalised locally from Northland to Otago, particularly in coastal environments (Fromont 1995). The species has become a serious environmental weed in the Auckland Region mostly on the islands of the Inner Hauraki Gulf.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Te Reo Māori and Ta Re Moriori in Taxonomy
    VealeNew Zealand et al.: Te Journal reo Ma- oriof Ecologyin taxonomy (2019) 43(3): 3388 © 2019 New Zealand Ecological Society. 1 REVIEW Using te reo Māori and ta re Moriori in taxonomy Andrew J. Veale1,2* , Peter de Lange1 , Thomas R. Buckley2,3 , Mana Cracknell4, Holden Hohaia2, Katharina Parry5 , Kamera Raharaha-Nehemia6, Kiri Reihana2 , Dave Seldon2,3 , Katarina Tawiri2 and Leilani Walker7 1Unitec Institute of Technology, 139 Carrington Road, Mt Albert, Auckland 1025, New Zealand 2Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, St Johns, Auckland 1072, New Zealand 3School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, 3A Symonds St, Auckland CBD, Auckland 1010, New Zealand 4Rongomaiwhenua-Moriori, Kaiangaroa, Chatham Island, New Zealand 5Massey University, Private Bag 11222 Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand 6Ngāti Kuri, Otaipango, Ngataki, Te Aupouri, Northland, New Zealand 7Auckland University of Technology, 55 Wellesley St E, Auckland CBS, Auckland 1010, New Zealand *Author for correspondence (Email: [email protected]) Published online: 28 November 2019 Auheke: Ko ngā ingoa Linnaean ka noho hei pou mō te pārongo e pā ana ki ngā momo koiora. He mea nui rawa kia mārama, kia ahurei hoki ngā ingoa pūnaha whakarōpū. Me pēnei kia taea ai te whakawhitiwhiti kōrero ā-pūtaiao nei. Nā tēnā kua āta whakatakotohia ētahi ture, tohu ārahi hoki hei whakahaere i ngā whakamārama pūnaha whakarōpū. Kua whakamanahia ēnei kia noho hei tikanga mō te ao pūnaha whakarōpū. Heoi, arā noa atu ngā hua o te tukanga waihanga ingoa Linnaean mō ngā momo koiora i tua atu i te tautohu noa i ngā momo koiora. Ko tētahi o aua hua ko te whakarau: (1) i te mātauranga o ngā iwi takatake, (2) i te kōrero rānei mai i te iwi o te rohe, (3) i ngā kōrero pūrākau rānei mō te wāhi whenua.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.PETER J. UCKO 1938-2007
    Intersecciones en Antropología ISSN: 1666-2105 [email protected] Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires Argentina ENDERE, MARÍA LUZ PETER J. UCKO 1938-2007 Intersecciones en Antropología, núm. 8, 2007, pp. 3-5 Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires, Argentina Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=179514534001 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto | 3 OBITUARIO PETER J. UCKO 1938-2007 Peter John Ucko falleció el 14 de En 1981 sucedió a Colin Renfrew junio de 2007 en la ciudad de Londres, como profesor de arqueología de la Uni- había nacido en Buckinghamshire, In- versity of Southampton. Durante su pe- glaterra, el 27 de julio de 1938. Se gra- ríodo en dicha universidad aceptó asu- duó en Antropología en la University mir el cargo de Secretario Nacional del College London (UCL) en 1959 y obtu- Congreso Británico de la International vo su PhD en Arqueología Prehistórica Union of Pre and Protohistory Sciences y Egiptología en la misma universidad (IUPPS) que se llevaría a cabo en Ingla- en 1962. Luego se incorporó como terra en 1986, con la promesa de que profesor del Departamento de Antropo- podría incluir nuevas temáticas -como logía de la UCL donde fundó la School el rol de la arqueología en el presente- of Material Culture Studies.
    [Show full text]