DOCSLIB.ORG

Chimariko Grammar: Areal and Typological Perspective

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chimariko Grammar: Areal and Typological Perspective UC Office of the President UC Publications in Linguistics Title Chimariko Grammar: Areal and Typological Perspective Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8309x2k0 Author Jany, Carmen Publication Date 2014-06-12 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Chimariko Grammar Chimariko Grammar Areal and Typological Perspective Carmen Jany University of California Press Berkeley • Los Angeles • London University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Publications in Linguistics, Volume 142 Editorial Board: Judith Aissen, Andrew Garrett, Larry M. Hyman, Marianne Mithun, Pamela Munro, Maria Polinsky University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2009 by The Regents of the University of California Printed in the United States of America Cataloging-in-Publication data for this title is on file with the Library of Congress. ISBN 978-0-520-09875-6 (pbk. : alk. paper) The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R 1997) (Permanence of Paper). To my parents Contents List of Tables..................................................................................................................................................xiii Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................xv Abbreviations................................................................................................................................................xvi Abstract..........................................................................................................................................................xvii 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Ethnographic setting............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Genetic and areal relationships............................................................................. 3 1.3 Fieldworkers and speakers.................................................................................... 7 1.4 Possible dialectal variation .................................................................................... 10 1.5 Sources and publications........................................................................................ 10 1.6 Grammatical sketch................................................................................................. 13 1.7 Organization of this work....................................................................................... 14 2. PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY ......................................................................................... 15 2.1 Phoneme inventory and orthography.................................................................. 15 2.1.1 Consonant inventory and allophonic variation ....................................... 15 2.1.1.1 Consonant inventory .......................................................................... 15 2.1.1.2 Stops, fricatives, and affricates ......................................................... 15 2.1.1.3 Lack of voicing distinction................................................................. 15 2.1.1.4 Nasals, liquids, and approximants .................................................... 15 2.1.1.5 Orthography......................................................................................... 15 2.1.1.6 Phonetic realizations .......................................................................... 15 2.1.1.7 Allophonic variations.......................................................................... 16 2.1.1.8 Retroflex phonemes............................................................................ 16 2.1.1.9 Speaker variation ................................................................................ 17 2.1.1.10 Minimal pairs ..................................................................................... 17 2.1.1.11 Phonemic status of sounds............................................................... 19 2.1.1.12 Gemination......................................................................................... 19 2.1.2 Vowel inventory and allophonic variation............................................... 20 2.1.2.1 Vowel inventory .................................................................................. 20 2.1.2.2 Minimal pairs ....................................................................................... 20 2.1.2.3 Vowel length ........................................................................................ 20 2.1.2.4 Diphthongs ........................................................................................... 21 2.1.2.5 Creaky voice ......................................................................................... 22 2.2 Syllable structure and phonotactic restrictions ................................................. 22 2.2.1 Syllable structure.......................................................................................... 22 2.2.2 Structure of roots.......................................................................................... 23 2.2.3 Phonotactic place and co-occurrence restrictions.................................. 24 2.2.3.1 Phonotactic restrictions..................................................................... 24 2.2.3.2 Possible consonant clusters............................................................... 26 vii viii Contents 2.2.3.3 Geminate consonant clusters ............................................................ 26 2.2.3.4 Summary of phonotactic restrictions .............................................. 27 2.3 Stress and prosody................................................................................................... 27 2.3.1 Stress............................................................................................................... 27 2.3.2 Prosodic units ................................................................................................ 28 2.4 Sound symbolism..................................................................................................... 28 2.5 Phonetics and phonology in areal-typological perspective.............................. 28 3. MORPHOPHONEMIC ALTERNATIONS.............................................................................. 33 3.1 Pronominal alternations......................................................................................... 33 3.2 Negation and imperatives ...................................................................................... 36 3.2.1 Negation ......................................................................................................... 36 3.2.1.1 Deletion of pronominal affix with x-..-na......................................... 36 3.2.1.2 Vowel backing and vowel assimilation with x-..-na ....................... 37 3.2.2 Imperatives .................................................................................................... 39 3.3 Other alternations ................................................................................................... 39 3.3.1 Stem shapes: Deletion of final vowel ......................................................... 39 3.3.2 Aspectual suffixes ......................................................................................... 39 3.3.3 Locative and directional affixes.................................................................. 40 3.3.4 Metathesis ...................................................................................................... 41 3.3.5 Affixes with initial consonant clusters...................................................... 42 3.3.6 Suffixes with the initial vowel /a/ ............................................................. 43 3.3.7 Suffixes with initial glottalized obstruents /k’, c’, č’/ or with /č/........ 43 3.3.8 Possessive markers ....................................................................................... 44 3.3.9 The derivative -Vˀ ......................................................................................... 45 3.4 Morphophonemics in areal-typological perspective......................................... 45 4. WORD CLASSES ................................................................................................................... 47 4.1 Nouns......................................................................................................................... 47 4.1.1 Common nouns and proper nouns............................................................. 49 4.1.2 Placenames..................................................................................................... 50 4.2 Pronouns ................................................................................................................... 51 4.2.1 Personal pronouns........................................................................................ 51 4.2.2 Interrogative pronouns...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wintu and Their Neighbors: a Very Small World-System
    THE WINTU AND THEIR NEIGHBORS: A VERY SMALL WORLD-SYSTEM Christopher Chase-Dunn Department of Sociology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, ND 21218 ABSTRACT The world-systems perspective analyzes the modern international system. This approach can be applied to long range social evolution by studying smaller regional intersocietal systems such as the late pre-contact Wintu and their neighbors. Three questions: 1. What was the nature of integration among wintu groups and between them and neighboring groups? 2. What are the spatial characteristics of this network regarding fall­ off of the impact of events? 3. Was there regional soc~ally­ structured inequality in this system? Archaeological data may allow estimation of extent and rate of Wintu expansion, obsidian trade patterns, settlement sizes, and other features of this little world-system. INTRODUCTION This paper describes a theoretical approach for the comparative study of world-systems and a preliminary consideration of a small regional intersocietal system composed of the Wintu people and their neighbors in Northern California. I am currently engaged in the study of two "cases" of relatively small intersocietal networks -- the Wintu-centered system and late prehistoric Hawaii (Chase-Dunn 1991). This paper describes my preliminary hypotheses and examines possibilities for using archaeological, ethnographic, and documentary evidence for answering questions raised by the world-systems perspective. The world-systems perspective is a theoretical approach which has been developed to analyze the dynamics of the Europe­ centered, and now-global, political economy composed of national societies (cf. Wallerstein 1974, 1979; Chase-Dunn 1989; and a very readable introduction in Shannon 1989). One important structure in this modern world-system is the core/periphery hierarchy -- a stratified system of relations among dominant "advanced" core states and dependent and "underdeveloped" peripheral areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right Thing to Do: Returning Land to the Wiyot Tribe
    THE RIGHT THING TO DO: RETURNING LAND TO THE WIYOT TRIBE by Karen Elizabeth Nelson A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Sociology May, 2008 THE RIGHT THING TO DO: RETURNING LAND TO THE WIYOT TRIBE by Karen Elizabeth Nelson Approved by the Master’s Thesis Committee: Jennifer Eichstedt, Committee Chair Date Elizabeth Watson, Committee Member Date Judith Little, Committee Member Date Jennifer Eichstedt, Graduate Coordinator Date Chris Hopper, Interim Dean for Research and Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT THE RIGHT THING TO DO: RETURNING LAND TO THE WIYOT TRIBE Karen Elizabeth Nelson In 2004, the Eureka City Council legally returned forty acres of Indian Island to the Wiyot tribe. This return occurred one hundred and forty four years after the Indian Island massacre. This research explores the returning of sacred tribal land in the context of collective apologies and reconciliations after generations of Native genocide. The significance of this case study includes a detailed narration of how the land transfer occurred and more importantly why it was labeled “the right thing to do” by Eureka City Council members and staff. This case study was examined with a grounded theory methodology. Using no hypotheses, the research and the research methodology unfolded in a non-linear process, letting the research speak for itself. Detailed interviews and a review of documents were used to qualify and quantify this unique community based social act. The results of this case study include how and why the Eureka City Council returned forty acres of Indian Island to the Wiyot people.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2015 Local Tribes
    LOCAL NORTHWEST CALIFORNIA TRIBES Sources: BIA edition 2000, California Indian Trust Land William Bright, 1957. The Karok Lanugage. UCPL 13., LOCAL NW CALIFORNIA TRIBES-- The Karuk, The Wiyot are south along the coast from Trinidad Hupa, Tolowa, Wiyot and Yurok Tribes remain on past Eureka to Ferndale, encompassing Arcata and their traditional homelands to this day. While Humboldt Bays, the lower Mad River, and the sharing a similar cultural framework, each of these lower Eel River. The Karuk lands are along the Tribes has a wholly distinct Tribal language. The Klamath above Yurok territory further up river to Little River is the boarder between the homelands beyond Happy Camp, and along the Salmon River; of the Wiyot and Yurok peoples. The Tolowa are the Hupa are from the Trinity River just before the from the extreme northern coast, from the junction with the Klamath, especially through the southwestern corner of Oregon to approximately north-south section called Hoopa Valley and south fifteen miles south of Crescent City at Wilson to Grouse Creek. The Tsnugwe people come from Creek. The Yurok come from the coast, from this the Trinity River area from Willow Creek through point south to just below Trinidad Bay, and up the the Burnt Ranch area. The Chilula and Whilkut Klamath River, extending about 45 miles to just were smaller tribes that inhabited warm interior before Bluff Creek, where Karuk Territory begins valleys close to Redwood Creek and the Mad River as well as a short distance south along the Trinity. watershed. Rev 4/13 spectators seated on benches around the pit, also pray and help in the spiritual treatment of the child.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Morphological Parallels Between Hokan Languages1
    Mikhail Zhivlov Russian State University for the Humanities; School for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, RANEPA (Moscow); [email protected] Some morphological parallels between Hokan languages1 In this paper I present a detailed analysis of a number of morphological comparisons be- tween the branches of the hypothetical Hokan family. The following areas are considered: 1) subject person/number markers on verbs, as well as possessor person/number markers on nouns, 2) so-called ‘lexical prefixes’ denoting instrument and manner of action on verbs, 3) plural infixes, used with both nouns and verbs, and 4) verbal directional suffixes ‘hither’ and ‘thither’. It is shown that the respective morphological parallels can be better accounted for as resulting from genetic inheritance rather than from areal diffusion. Keywords: Hokan languages, Amerindian languages, historical morphology, genetic vs. areal relationship 0. The Hokan hypothesis, relating several small language families and isolates of California, was initially proposed by Dixon and Kroeber (1913) more than a hundred years ago. There is still no consensus regarding the validity of Hokan: some scholars accept the hypothesis (Kaufman 1989, 2015; Gursky 1995), while others view it with great skepticism (Campbell 1997: 290–296, Marlett 2007; cf. a more positive assessment in Golla 2011: 82–84, as well as a neutral overview in Jany 2016). My own position is that the genetic relationship between most languages usually subsumed under Hokan is highly likely, and that the existence of the Ho- kan family can be taken as a working hypothesis, subject to further proof or refutation. The goal of the present paper is to draw attention to several morphological parallels be- tween Hokan languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Used in Basketry by the California Indians
    PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS BY RUTH EARL MERRILL PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS RUTH EARL MERRILL INTRODUCTION In undertaking, as a study in economic botany, a tabulation of all the plants used by the California Indians, I found it advisable to limit myself, for the time being, to a particular form of use of plants. Basketry was chosen on account of the availability of material in the University's Anthropological Museum. Appreciation is due the mem- bers of the departments of Botany and Anthropology for criticism and suggestions, especially to Drs. H. M. Hall and A. L. Kroeber, under whose direction the study was carried out; to Miss Harriet A. Walker of the University Herbarium, and Mr. E. W. Gifford, Asso- ciate Curator of the Museum of Anthropology, without whose interest and cooperation the identification of baskets and basketry materials would have been impossible; and to Dr. H. I. Priestley, of the Ban- croft Library, whose translation of Pedro Fages' Voyages greatly facilitated literary research. Purpose of the sttudy.-There is perhaps no phase of American Indian culture which is better known, at least outside strictly anthro- pological circles, than basketry. Indian baskets are not only concrete, durable, and easily handled, but also beautiful, and may serve a variety of purposes beyond mere ornament in the civilized household. Hence they are to be found in. our homes as well as our museums, and much has been written about the art from both the scientific and the popular standpoints. To these statements, California, where American basketry.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND-USE CONFLICT at SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA a Thesis
    THE ROLE OF CRITICAL CARTOGRAPHY IN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: LAND-USE CONFLICT AT SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Geography by Anne Kathryn McTavish San Francisco, California January, 2010 Copyright by Anne Kathryn McTavish 2010 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read The Role of Critical Cartography in Environmental Justice: Land-use Conflict at Shasta Dam, California by Anne Kathryn McTavish, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree: Master of Arts in Geography at San Francisco State University. ____________________________________________________ Nancy Lee Wilkinson Professor of Geography ____________________________________________________ Jerry Davis Professor of Geography THE ROLE OF CRITICAL CARTOGRAPHY IN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: LAND-USE CONFLICT AT SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA Anne Kathryn McTavish San Francisco State University 2010 The United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) is conducting a feasibility study to increase the height of Shasta Dam. The Winnemem Wintu Indian Tribe contend that any increase in the storage capacity of Shasta Lake would inundate their remaining cultural and historic sites, tribal lands, and current homestead, an act they describe as “cultural genocide.” Critical Cartography plays a valuable role evaluating the Winnemem Wintu claim, revealing how the tribe’s claim to land was mapped, then unmapped, over the past two-hundred years. I certify that the Abstract is a correct representation of the content of this thesis. ___________________________________________ ________________ Chair, Thesis Committee Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been amazed, delighted, appalled, and humbled as I learned about the rights, issues, and status of the Winnemem Wintu.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Prescribed fire and tanoak (Notholithocarpus densiflorus) associated cultural plant resources of the Karuk and Yurok Peoples of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/02r7x8r6 Author Halpern, Arielle Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Prescribed fire and tanoak (Notholithocarpus densiflorus) associated cultural plant resources of the Karuk and Yurok Peoples of California by Arielle Anita Halpern A dissertation in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Wayne P. Sousa, Co-Chair Professor Thomas J. Carlson, Co-Chair Professor Scott L. Stephens Frank K. Lake, Ph.D. Spring 2016 Abstract Prescribed fire and tanoak (Notholithocarpus densiflorus) associated cultural plant resources of the Karuk and Yurok Peoples of California by Arielle Anita Halpern Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Wayne P. Sousa and Professor Thomas J. Carlson, Co-Chairs The targeted application of prescribed fire has long been used by Native Californian peoples to manage plant resources of cultural value. Their ability to employ this management tool has been increasingly restricted by local, state and federal agencies in response to recent drought conditions and the highly flammable state of most western U.S. forests, where, for decades, fires of any magnitude have been suppressed as a matter of policy. This diminished access to cultural prescribed fire has impacted tribal access to many of the plant resources and cultural activities upon which Karuk and Yurok cultures are based.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Languages, Indigenous Languages of the Native Peoples of North, Middle, and South America
    Native American Languages, indigenous languages of the native peoples of North, Middle, and South America. The precise number of languages originally spoken cannot be known, since many disappeared before they were documented. In North America, around 300 distinct, mutually unintelligible languages were spoken when Europeans arrived. Of those, 187 survive today, but few will continue far into the 21st century, since children are no longer learning the vast majority of these. In Middle America (Mexico and Central America) about 300 languages have been identified, of which about 140 are still spoken. South American languages have been the least studied. Around 1500 languages are known to have been spoken, but only about 350 are still in use. These, too are disappearing rapidly. Classification A major task facing scholars of Native American languages is their classification into language families. (A language family consists of all languages that have evolved from a single ancestral language, as English, German, French, Russian, Greek, Armenian, Hindi, and others have all evolved from Proto-Indo-European.) Because of the vast number of languages spoken in the Americas, and the gaps in our information about many of them, the task of classifying these languages is a challenging one. In 1891, Major John Wesley Powell proposed that the languages of North America constituted 58 independent families, mainly on the basis of superficial vocabulary resemblances. At the same time Daniel Brinton posited 80 families for South America. These two schemes form the basis of subsequent classifications. In 1929 Edward Sapir tentatively proposed grouping these families into superstocks, 6 in North America and 15 in Middle America.
    [Show full text]
  • Curing the Tribal Disenrollment Epidemic: in Search of a Remedy
    CURING THE TRIBAL DISENROLLMENT EPIDEMIC: IN SEARCH OF A REMEDY Gabriel S. Galanda and Ryan D. Dreveskracht* This Article provides a comprehensive analysis of tribal membership, and the divestment thereof—commonly known as “disenrollment.” Chiefly caused by the proliferation of Indian gaming revenue distributions to tribal members over the last 25 years, the rate of tribal disenrollment has spiked to epidemic proportions. There is not an adequate remedy to stem the crisis or redress related Indian civil rights violations. This Article attempts to fill that gap. In Part I, we detail the origins of tribal membership, concluding that the present practice of disenrollment is, for the most part, a relic of the federal government’s Indian assimilation and termination policies of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In Part II, we use empirical disenrollment case studies over the last 100 years to show those federal policies at work during that span, and thus how disenrollment operates in ways that are antithetical to tribal sovereignty and self-determination. Those case studies highlight the close correlation between federally prescribed distributions of tribal governmental assets and monies to tribal members on a per-capita basis, and tribal governmental mass disenrollment of tribal members. In Part III, we set forth various proposed solutions to curing the tribal disenrollment epidemic, in hope of spurring discussion and policymaking about potential remedies at the various levels of federal and tribal government. Our goal is to find a cure, before it is too late. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 385 A. Overview .................................................................................................... 385 B. Background ................................................................................................ 389 I. ORIGINS OF TRIBAL “MEMBERSHIP” ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Yurok Language Project at Berkeley
    International Journal of Lexicography, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 405–419 doi:10.1093/ijl/ecr018 Advance access publication 20 July 2011 405 AN ONLINE DICTIONARY WITH TEXTS AND PEDAGOGICAL TOOLS: THE YUROK LANGUAGE PROJECT AT BERKELEY Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ijl/article/24/4/405/1076335 by guest on 27 September 2021 Andrew Garrett: University of California, Berkeley ([email protected]) Abstract In this paper, I report on an online dictionary project for a highly endangered Native language of North America. This project involves a dynamic lexicon, linked to a corpus of texts and enriched with several associated tools, which is designed to be useful for (and is regularly used by) scholars, language teachers, and language learners. The inter- est of this project for a broader audience emerges not from lexicographic innovations as such, but from how texts and lexicon are combined and how the interests of diverse user communities are addressed. 1. B a ck gro und 1.1 Language context Yurok is spoken in northwestern California, near the Oregon border; it is one of three distantly related branches of the Algic language family. One of the other two branches also consists of a single language, Wiyot, formerly spoken just to the south along the Pacific coast; Teeter (1964) presents an overview (the last first-language speaker died in the 1960s). The third Algic branch comprises the widely dispersed Algonquian language family of central and eastern North America; for a brief survey see Mithun (1999: 327-340). Like most indigenous languages of California, Yurok was spoken in pre-contact times by relatively few people in a small territory; there were about 2,500 Yurok people occupying 80 miles along the lower Klamath River and the Pacific coast (Kroeber 1925: 17).
    [Show full text]
  • The Yurok Language Project at Berkeley: an Online Dictionary with Texts and Pedagogical Tools
    The Yurok Language Project at Berkeley: An online dictionary with texts and pedagogical tools Andrew Garrett University of California, Berkeley In this paper, I report on an online dictionary project for a highly endangered Native language of North America. This project involves a dynamic lexicon, linked to a corpus of texts and enriched with several associated tools, which is designed to be useful for (and is regularly used by) scholars, language teachers, and language learners. The interest of this project for a broader audience emerges not from lexicographic innovations as such, but from how texts and lexicon are combined and how the interests of diverse user communities are addressed. 1. Background 1.1. Language context Yurok is spoken in northwestern California, near the Oregon border; it is one of three distantly related branches of the Algic language family. One of the other two branches also consists of a single language, Wiyot, formerly spoken just to the south along the Pacific coast; Teeter (1964) presents an overview (the last first-language speaker died in the 1960s). The third Algic branch comprises the widely dispersed Algonquian language family of central and eastern North America; for a brief survey see Mithun (1999: 327-340). Like most indigenous languages of California, Yurok was spoken in pre-contact times by relatively few people in a small territory; there were about 2,500 Yurok people occupying 80 miles along the lower Klamath River and the Pacific coast (Kroeber 1925: 17). In 2011 there are still a few elderly first-language speakers of Yurok, but it is no longer easy for them to play an active role in language teaching.
    [Show full text]