385689496-Sen-Robert-Menendez

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

385689496-Sen-Robert-Menendez Co-Founder Ken Boehm 1949-2018 National Legal and Board of Directors Peter Flaherty, Chairman Ku rt C h ri ste n sen, Vice-Chai rm an Policy Centerffif Michael Falcone Richard F. LaMountain David Wilkinson "promoting ethics in public life" Since 1991 August 7,2018 Office of Information Policy U,S. Department of Justice 1425 New York Avenue, N.W. suire I1050 Washington, D.C. 20530 RE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST Dear Sir/Madam, National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) respectfully requests all records related to investigations conducted by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of United States Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) since January l,2012,including but not limited to DOJ's decision to drop all criminal charges against Menendez, as announced on January 31, 2018. NLPC requests these records, regardless of format, including electronic records, audiotapes, written notes, and videotapes, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. $$ 552, et seq., DOJ regulations, 28 C.F.R Part 16. NLPC excludes from the request records covered by grand jury secrecy pursuant to Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal hocedure. The DOJ conducted an investigation of Senator Menendez related to federal corruption charges, including using his official position to further the business of Salomon Melgen, a doctor and one of Menendez's top donors. Menendez and Melgen were indicted on April 7,2015 on a variety of corruption charges. Following an 1 I -week trial that resulted in a hung jury, the Department of Justice chose not to retry Senator Menendez and dropped the charges against the disgraced Senator. (See Exhibit A). Please search for all responsive records regardless of format, medium, or physical characteristics. Where possible, please produce records electronically and with searchable functionality. Our request includes any letters, emails, facsimiles, telephone messages, voicemail messages, and any notes regarding discussions about the investigation, including transcripts, notes, or minutes of meetings and telephone conversations.In addition, we request any attachments to these records. In the event some portions of the request are exempt from disclosure, please disclose the rationality for the exempt portions. We also ask that you index the documents that are exempt from disclosure, as required wder Vaughn v. Rosen; 484 F.2d 820 (D.C. Cir. 1973), cert denied,4l5 U .5.977 (1072). 107 Park Washington Court. Falls Church, VA. 22046 703-237-1 970. fax 703-237-2090. www.nlpc.org Office of Information Policy- U.S. Department of Justice August 7,2018 Page Two Among the actions of which Menendez is accused: taking free rides on Melgen's private jets to luxurious resorts around the world; failure to report or disclose these gifts of travel; arranging for Melgen's foreign-born girlfriends get visas to the United States; intervening with federal authorities to thwart an investigation of the massive fraud of which Melgen was eventually convicted; and pressuring State Department officials to act to further Melgen's business interests in the Dominican Republic. (See Exhibits B & C.) The requested documents would shed light on the conduct of the DOJ and FBI in conducting the investigation into Senator Menendez and the decision to not retry the Senator. While the DOJ chose to drop the charges, Senator Menendez's activities still could have been illegal or in violation of the rules of the Senate, and the requested records would bring these activities to light. Fee Waiver Request In accordance with 5 U.S.C. $ 552(a)(a)(Axiii) and28 C.F.R. $ 16,11(k), NLPC requests a waiver of fees associated with processing this request for records. The subject of this request concerns the operations of the federal government and expenditures, and the disclosures will likely contribute to a better understanding of relevant government procedures by NLPC and the general public in a significant way. Moreover, the request is primarily and fundamentally for non-commercial purposes. These records are likely to contribute to greater public awareness of possible criminal behavior by Senator Menendez and why the DOJ decided to drop the charges. NLPC is a non-profit organization under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. NLPC is committed to promoting ethics in public life through monitoring and reporting of public officials to ensure the integrity of those who hold public office. NLPC will analyze the information responsive to this request, and will share its analysis with the public, In addition, NLPC will disseminate any documents it acquires form this request to the public through its website. Under these circumstances, NLPC satisfies fully the criteria for a fee waiver. News Media Fee Waiver Request NLPC asks that it not be charged search or revi'ew fees for this request because NLPC qualifies as a "representative of the news media" pursuant to the FOIA .ln Nat'l Sec. Archive v. U.S. Dep't of Defense,880F.2d 1381,1386(D.C.Cir. 1989)theCourtof AppealsfortheDistrictof ColumbiaCircuit found the National Security Archive was representative of the news media under the FOIA, which allowed for "representative of the news media" to be interpreted broadly. NLPC disseminates information to the public in several ways, including a frequently visited website that is updated daily. Additionally, NLPC publishes an online newsletter with regular updates regarding NLPC's activities and information the organization has received form government entities. Lastly, NLPC publishes blog posts that reports on and analyzes newsworthy developments regarding government ethics and corruption, Based on these extensive publication activitiss, NLPC qualifies for a fee waiver as a "representative of the news media" under the FOIA and agency regulations, Office of Information Policy- U.S. Department of Justice August 7,2018 Page Three NLPC welcomes the opportunity to discuss with you whether and to what extent this request can be modified to better enable the DOJ to process it within FOIA deadlines. If you have any questions about this request or foresee any problems in realizing fully the requested records, please contact me. EXHIBIT A Justice Dept. won't retry Sen. Bob Menendez By Laura Jarrett, Dan Berman and Sarah Jorgensen, CNN January 3 l,20l8 https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/31/politics/menendez-charges-dismiss/index.html (CNN)The Justice Department Wednesday filed to dismiss its remaining charges against Sen. Bob Menendez, bringing the legal case that has hovered over the New Jersey Democrat for years to a close. An I I -week trial last fall resulted in a hung jury. Prosecutors had accused the senator of accepting bribes from Dr. Salomon Melgen, a wealthy ophthalmologist in Florida, in return for political favors. The charges against Melgen were also dropped. "Given the impact of the Court's Jan. 24 order on the charges and the evidence admissible in a retrial, the United States has determined that it will not retry the defendants on the remaining charges," DOJ spokeswoman Nicole Navas Oxman said. "From the very beginning, I never wavered in my innocence and my belief that justice would prevait," Menendez said in a statement Wednesday. "l am grateful that the Department of Justice has taken the time to reevaluate its case and come to the appropriate conclusion.I thank God for hearing my prayers and for giving me strength during this difficult time. I have devoted my life to serving the people of New Jersey, and am forever thanldul for all who have stood by me." Melgen attorney Kirk Ogrosky called the case an "ill-fated adventure" by the FBI and Justice Department "that destroyed my client's life." "Dr, Melgen is now and has always been innocent of the charges brought in New Jersey. He did not ever give anything to his best friend of over 20 years with an expectation that he would get something in return," Ogrosky said. "We take no pleasure in seeing justice done at this stage in a case that should never have been brought. All that said, justice today is better than continuing on to inevitable acquittals on the remaining counts. We hope that this type of meritless case is never again brought by DOJ." After last fall's trial ended, one juror told reporters the jury was split l0-2 on all counts in favor of acquittal. "ln light of the results of a three month trial, all the jury said and the granting of our motion for acquittal on significant counts, we are pleased and grateful that the Justice Department made the right decision to end this case," Menendez attorney Abbe Lowell said Wednesday. In November when the trial ended in a mistrial, Menendez criticized the Justice Department. "The way this case started was wrong, the way it was investigated was wrong, the way it was prosecuted was wrong and the way it was tried was wrong as well," Menendez told reporters outside the courthouse. "Certain elements of the FBI and of our state cannot understand or, even worse, accept that the Latino kid from Union City and Hudson County can grow up and be a US senator and be honest." Menendez faced charges of conspiracy, bribery and honest services fraud related to allegedly abusing the power of his office that could have carried decades in prison. Prosecutors said Menendez pressured high- level officials in the Obama administration and other career diplomats to help Melgen resolve his business disputes in exehange f,or political contributions, a luxurious hotel suite at the Park Hyatt in Paris and free rides on Melgen's private jet that Menendez failed to report on his Senate disclosure form. Defense lawyers argued that MenendezandMelgen were longtime friends with no corrupt intent to commit a federal crirne.
Recommended publications
  • New York Times
    New York Times Jared Kushner Paid No Federal Income Tax for Years, Documents Suggest Confidential documents reviewed by The Times indicate that Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and adviser, probably paid little or no income tax from 2009 to 2016. By Jesse Drucker and Emily Flitter Oct. 13, 2018 Over the past decade, Jared Kushner’s family company has spent billions of dollars buying real estate. His personal stock investments have soared. His net worth has quintupled to almost $324 million. And yet, for several years running, Mr. Kushner — President Trump’s son-in-law and a senior White House adviser — appears to have paid almost no federal income taxes, according to confidential financial documents reviewed by The New York Times. His low tax bills are the result of a common tax-minimizing maneuver that, year after year, generated millions of dollars in losses for Mr. Kushner, according to the documents. But the losses were only on paper — Mr. Kushner and his company did not appear to actually lose any money. The losses were driven by depreciation, a tax benefit that lets real estate investors deduct a portion of the cost of their buildings from their taxable income every year. In 2015, for example, Mr. Kushner took home $1.7 million in salary and investment gains. But those earnings were swamped by $8.3 million of losses, largely because of “significant depreciation” that Mr. Kushner and his company took on their real estate, according to the documents reviewed by The Times. Nothing in the documents suggests Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooper Letter FINAL Oct 10
    Cooper University Health Care Board of Trustees One Cooper Plaza Camden, New Jersey 08103 October 10, 2019 To the Board of Trustees of Cooper University Health Care: Cooper Health System is the largest employer in Camden County, offers critical access to care in the City of Camden, and provides health care delivery for the entire southern New Jersey region. If its financial soundness or its management is compromised, the health care of many is also compromised. Yet, Cooper is embroiled in yet another scandal under Board Chairman George E. Norcross III that calls into question the integrity and capacity of the leadership of Cooper and its ability to govern in a manner free from further scandal or controversy. The latest scandal over the role of Cooper’s management in the questionable purchase of the L3 property in Camden needs to be the final signal that Mr. Norcross must resign immediately from his positions with Cooper and that Governor Murphy, through his Attorney General and Commissioner of Health, must examine whether a monitor, receivership, or other forms of real oversight is appropriate and necessary to oversee the critical operations of Cooper Health. Please consider the following in recent years: • Conflicts of Interest & Patronage: In 2012, a Philadelphia Inquirer investigation “Powerful Medicine: How George Norcross Used his Political Muscle to Pump up Once-Ailing Cooper Hospital” exposed that “the hospital has become another piece of his political apparatus”; that “Norcross’ insurance business and the law firm of his brother”
    [Show full text]
  • Leak: the “National Security” Attack on Free Speech
    Volume 14 No. 2 2011 TOURO INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW 273 When the Nation Springs a [Wiki]Leak: The “National Security” Attack on Free Speech By Kate Kovarovic* We are willing enough to praise freedom when she is safely tucked away in the past and cannot be a nuisance. In the present, amidst dangers whose outcome we cannot foresee, we get nervous about her, and admit censorship. -Edward Forster, 1951 ----- I. INTRODUCTION The free speech clause of the First Amendment is a core provision of the United States Constitution and a founding principle of our democratic nation. The drafters of the Constitution truly believed in the “public‟s right to receive information about government affairs”1 and thus included in the First Amendment a general prohibition of laws abridging the freedom of speech and press.2 As such, the First Amendment has consistently been found to “protect[] the public[‟s] right to access government information and to express opinions regarding the functioning of the government . .”3 Yet during the drafting of the Constitution there also existed a group of dissenters who called for caution in granting the press broad access to * Kovarovic is a JD/MA Candidate at American University‟s Washington College of Law, where she has primarily studied the fields of international law, human rights, and national security/counterterrorism. She will receive her JD in May 2011 and her MA in International Affairs in December 2011. 1 Mary-Rose Papandrea, Lapdogs, Watchdogs, and Scapegoats: The Press and National Security Information, 83 IND. L. J. 233, 238 (2008) (hereinafter “Papandrea, Lapdogs, Watchdogs, and Scapegoats”).
    [Show full text]
  • Impeachment Inquiry: William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States Presentation on Behalf of the President
    IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY: WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES PRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PURSUANT TO H. RES. 581: PRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT DECEMBER 8 AND 9, 1998 Serial No. 68 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 52±320 WASHINGTON : 1998 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 1 VerDate 21-DEC-98 10:55 Jan 12, 1999 Jkt 053320 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\RENEE\53320P2.000 53320p PsN: 53320p COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL McCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICK BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR SMITH, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana MAXINE WATERS, California ED BRYANT, Tennessee MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts BOB BARR, Georgia ROBERT WEXLER, Florida WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey ASA HUTCHINSON, Arkansas THOMAS BARRETT, Wisconsin EDWARD A. PEASE, Indiana CHRISTOPHER B. CANNON, Utah JAMES E. ROGAN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina MARY BONO, California (II) VerDate 21-DEC-98 10:55 Jan 12, 1999 Jkt 053320 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\RENEE\53320P2.000 53320p PsN: 53320p MAJORITY STAFF THOMAS E.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 2:15-Cr-00155-WHW Document 83 Filed 08/24/15 Page 1 of 65 Pageid: 1194
    Case 2:15-cr-00155-WHW Document 83 Filed 08/24/15 Page 1 of 65 PageID: 1194 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) No. 2:15-cr-155 v. ) Hon. William H. Walls ) ROBERT MENENDEZ and ) SALOMON MELGEN, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) UNITED STATES’ CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS ALLEGING MISCONDUCT (Mot. Nos. 3, 5, & 6; Dkt. Nos. 50, 52, & 53) RAYMOND HULSER CHIEF Peter Koski Deputy Chief J.P. Cooney Deputy Chief Monique Abrishami Trial Attorney Public Integrity Section Criminal Division United States Department of Justice Attorneys for the United States of America Case 2:15-cr-00155-WHW Document 83 Filed 08/24/15 Page 2 of 65 PageID: 1195 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................................... iii TABLE OF EXHIBITS .................................................................................................................. v INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 I. THE DEFENDANTS’ CORRUPTION CHARGES ARE NOT TAINTED BY UNPROVEN ALLEGATIONS THEY SOLICITED UNDERAGE PROSTITUTES. (Mot. No. 6, Dkt. No. 53.) ..................................................................... 4 II. EVIDENCE CONCERNING DEFENDANT MELGEN’S LAVISH GIFTS TO DEFENDANT MENENDEZ, AND TESTIMONY BY THE FEMALE BENEFICIARIES OF THE DEFENDANTS’ CORRUPT RELATIONSHIP, IS RELEVANT TO THIS
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Order As the Foundational Paradox of the Trump Presidency
    Stanford Law Review Online Volume 73 June 2021 SYMPOSIUM ESSAY Law and Order as the Foundational Paradox of the Trump Presidency Trevor George Gardner* Abstract. This Essay scrutinizes the feuding between the Trump White House and various federal law enforcement agencies, concurrent with criminal lawbreaking in the Trump Administration, in an effort to extend scholarly understanding of the relationship between law-and-order politics and popular regard for rule-of-law principles. Sociolegal scholars have long argued that the politics advanced under the banner of “law and order” reduces the whole of the criminal–legal order to minority violent crime. In doing so, these politics stoke white racial anxieties regarding one or more racial minority groups. But under the Trump regime, law-and-order politics exhibited an additional benefit to its purveyors: obfuscation of the threat to the criminal– legal order posed by the very purveyors of these politics. This is to say that the criminal offending of the Trump campaign and Administration would likely have been more politically damaging to the Administration had much of the public not been fixated on Trump’s allegation of a rising tide of minority violent crime. Moreover, this same reductive logic has badly damaged the political standing of Black Lives Matter. It has often reduced the Black Lives Matter organization—effectively, a rule-of-law campaign targeting extra-legal police violence—to the limited instances of violent crime found at the margins of Black Lives Matter protest activity. * Professor of Law, Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. This Essay was written for the 2021 Policing, Race, and Power Symposium hosted by the Stanford Law Review and the Stanford Black Law Students Association, and for the cross-journal Reckoning and Reformation Symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • Kushner Failed to Provide Russia Documents, Senate Panel Found - the New York Times
    11/17/2017 Kushner Failed to Provide Russia Documents, Senate Panel Found - The New York Times Kushner Failed to Provide Russia Documents, Senate Panel Found Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son‑in‑law and senior adviser, at the White House this month. Doug Mills/The New York Times By Michael S. Schmidt (http://www.nytimes.com/by/michael‑s‑schmidt) Nov. 16, 2017 WASHINGTON — The Senate Judiciary Committee has uncovered evidence that Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son‑in‑law and senior adviser, was forwarded a document about a “Russian backdoor overture” that Mr. Kushner failed to hand over to the panel’s investigators, according to a letter that the committee released on Thursday. The Senate letter did not say what type of back channel communication the Russians were trying to set up. But it noted that “other parties have produced documents concerning the matter.” Mr. Kushner also failed to provide investigators with a September 2016 email he was sent about WikiLeaks, nor did he hand over other communications with a Russian‑born businessman that were forwarded him, according to the letter. The https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/us/politics/senate-judiciary-kushner-russia.html?_r=0 1/8 11/17/2017 Kushner Failed to Provide Russia Documents, Senate Panel Found - The New York Times businessman, Sergei Millian, a former head of the Russian‑American Chamber of Commerce, has long claimed to have ties to Mr. Trump and his associates — ties that Mr. Trump’s advisers have said are overstated. WikiLeaks has been identified by American intelligence agencies as acting as a conduit for information that Russian intelligence operatives had stolen from Democrats during the 2016 presidential campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Impeachment of President William Jefferson Clinton
    106TH CONGRESS DOCUMENT 1st Session SENATE 106±3 "! IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON THE EVIDENTIARY RECORD PURSUANT TO S. RES. 16 VOLUME VII Transcript of October 5, 1998 presentations of David Schippers and Abbe Lowell, and debate on H. Res. 581, beginning an impeachment inquiry. Committee Print, Ser. No. 8, December 1998 Printed at the direction of Gary Sisco, Secretary of the Senate, pursuant to S. Res. 16, 106th Cong., 1st Sess. (1999) JANUARY 8, 1999.ÐOrdered to be printed 1 105th Congress Ser. No. 8 2d Session COMMITTEE PRINT "! AUTHORIZATION OF AN INQUIRY INTO WHETHER GROUNDS EXIST FOR THE IM- PEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MEETING OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HELD OCTOBER 5, 1998 PRESENTATION BY INQUIRY STAFF CONSIDERATION OF INQUIRY RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF INQUIRY PROCEDURES COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS HENRY J. HYDE, Chairman DECEMBER 1998 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 53±446 WASHINGTON : 1998 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL McCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICK BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana MAXINE WATERS, California ED BRYANT, Tennessee MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio WILLIAM D.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPERIOR COURT for the Distrlct of COLUMBIA STEVEN
    SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRlCT OF COLUMBIA Civil Division ) STEVEN J. ROSEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-01256 B ) AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS ) COMMITTEE, INC., et. al., ) ) Defendants, ) ----------------) PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO AIPAC'S REQUEST FQR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Plaintiff, by and through his below-signed attorney of record, notes that, after plaintiff conducted an exhaustive search involving hundreds ofhours, he is producing the following described documents bearing a number from 1 to 131, each of which is responsive to one or more of defendant AIPAC's document requests: [Note that the descriptions of the documents are offered as an aid to defendants and their counsel and, accordingly, the composition of and punctuation used in the document descriptions below are exclusively that ofcounsel for plaintiff- and not plaintiffhimself­ and are not meant to be in any sense authoritative descriptions ofthe documents being produced.]: No. Description ofProduced Docum~nt 1. January 4, 2004, Employee Performance Review of Steven Rosen. 2. April 20, 1982, letter from Steven Rosen to Tom Dine transmitting proposed "Memorandum of Agreement" for the new department that he would be heading at AIPAC beginning July 1, 1982. 3. October 11, 1983, letter from Steven Rosen to Guilford Glazer, a lay leader, with copies to Tom Dine, Executive Director (who responded "Excellent sturn") and Lawrence Weinberg, No. Description of Produced Document AlPAC 's President, in which Rosen described a "secret National Security Decision Directive #99 calling on the Armed Services and the Secretary of Defense to explore the potential for stepped-up strategic cooperation" with Israel and said "we provided some materials on a confidential request." 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Lit Hum Turns 75 Columbia College Spring 2013 TODAY Contents Network with LITERATURE HUMANITIES TURNS 75 Columbia a SPECIAL SECTION Alumni
    Lit Hum Turns 75 Columbia College Spring 2013 TODAY Contents NETWORK WITH LITERATURE HUMANITIES TURNS 75 COLUMBIA A SPECIAL SECTION ALUMNI 17 Students and 23 Faculty Find 27 Lit Hum 32 Alumni Book Faculty Embrace Lit Hum Challeng- for Life Club Carries On Classic Readings, ing, Fulfilling the Tradition “I left Columbia with Modern Technology “The course is a marriage an understanding of “The idea is to further “The course is not a of methodologies and the power of asking our education and what museum-like visit. the idiosyncrasies of the the right questions.” we started in Lit Hum.” It’s about the inter- individual instructor.” BY ALEXIS TONTI ’11 ARTS BY NATHALIE ALONSO ’08 BILL CAMPBELL, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY rogation of texts.” BY SHIRA BOSS ’93, ’97J, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, INTUIT Y IMOTHY ROSS ’98 SIPA MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, APPLE B T P. C ’98 MEMBER OF THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CLUB OF NEW YORK GSAS 30 Today’s Lit Hum The perfect midtown location to network, dine with a Syllabus client, hold events or business meetings, house guests by the in town for the weekend, and much more. Numbers To become a member, visit columbiaclub.org or call 212-719-0380. in residence at The Princeton Club of New York 15 WEST 43 STREET COVER: LESLIE JEAN-BART ’76, ’77J; LIT HUM LOGO: R.J. MATSON ’85 NEW YORK, NY 10036 Columbia Ad_famous alumni.indd 6 11/8/12 12:48 PM MESSAGE FROM DEAN JAMES J. VALENTINI DEPARTMENTS ALUMNI NEWS 3 Message from the 16 Roar, Lion, Roar 41 Message from the 49 Obituaries Celebrating Lit Hum, Dean CCAA President 50 Daniel J.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Term 2000 September
    from the dean Being the new dean of and securitization, and standardization of Auschwitz inmates who continued to Duke Law School has market practices. create beautiful art even in the harsh brought some interest­ The new course "Law and Entrepren­ confines of the Nazi death camp. ing surprises. Perhaps eurship" illustrates in other ways the Courtney Bourns '64 practices law but the biggest surprise is creativity, foresight and interdisciplinary also devotes his time and energy to a the richness and diversity nature of the Law School's business Hartford, Conn., organization he found­ of intellectual activity curriculum. This course combines the ed, called "The Gathering Place," which at the School. As a faculty expertise of Professor David draws residents together from many faculty member, I was Lange with the business acumen of Duke different backgrounds and has helped familiar with events, Law alumnus Kip Frey '85. It recognizes infuse life in the inner city. Similarly, initiatives and curricu­ that many of our students will enter Thomas Logue '82 helped preserve a lar developments that business, either directly from law school 500-year-old Tequesta Indian site at the related to my areas of or shortly thereafter; that the talents mouth of the Miami River and received teaching and scholar­ of regular faculty members can be an award for his work from the Florida ship, but J did not tremendously enhanced by the expertise Archeological Society. Stephen Kanar '69 always keep up with the activity outside of those currently in busine s; and that has earned solid reviews for his recently my field.
    [Show full text]
  • Catherine Ross Dunham
    DUNHAM 1 CATHERINE ROSS DUNHAM PROFESSOR OF LAW ELON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Work Address: 201 North Greene Street Greensboro, N.C. 27401 336-278-9241 [email protected] http://ssrn.com/author=885208 Academic Experience: Elon University School of Law Professor of Law, March 2009 – present Associate Dean of Academic Affairs, January 2008 – May 2013 Associate Professor of Law, Fall 2006 – March 2009 Director of the Trial Practice Program, Fall 2007 – August 2011 Courses: Civil Procedure, Evidence, Advanced Civil Procedure (formerly titled Complex Civil Litigation), Pre-Trial Practice, Trial Practice and Procedure, Advanced Trial Practice and Procedure, Appellate Advocacy Committee Appointments: Promotion and Tenure (2009-present; Chair 2017-2019) Curriculum (2015-19, Chair 2016-17); Faculty Recruiting (2006-2014; 2016-17; 2017- 18; 2018-19); Search Committee for University Provost (2018-19); Ad Hoc Committee on Contract Faculty Appointments (2015-16), Contract Faculty Promotion and Retention Policies (2015-17), 4C Redux Committee (2016-17); Faculty Handbook (2013-15); Self Study Committee (2009, 2010 Chair, 2013 Chair); Law School Strategic Planning Committee (Co-Chair 2013-14); Evaluation and Instruction (2008 Chair); Clinics, Simulations, and Experimental Learning (2008), Dean Search Committee (2008) Library Director Search Committee (2008), Curriculum and Assessment Committee (2009-2012). University Service: Appointed law school representative to the Elon University Academic Council (Faculty Senate) (2018-2020); Strategic Planning Committee for Elon University (2009-10); Women’s Advisory Board of Elon University (2010-20); Women in Philanthropy Committee; Distinguished University Professor Nominating Committee (2016-17);University Provost Search Committee (2018-19). University of North Carolina Law School Adjunct Faculty, Summer and Fall 2019 (Evidence) University of Virginia School of Law L.L.M.
    [Show full text]