Williston Basin Province—Stratigraphic and Structural Framework to a Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Williston Basin Province—Stratigraphic and Structural Framework to a Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil And Chapter 2 Williston Basin Province—Stratigraphic and Structural Framework to a Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources Click here to return to Volume Title Page By Lawrence O. Anna, Richard Pollastro, Stephanie B. Gaswirth Chapter 2 of 7 Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Williston Basin Province of North Dakota, Montana, and South Dakota, 2010 By U.S. Geological Survey Williston Basin Province Assessment Team U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–W U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Anna, L.O., Pollastro, Richard, and Gaswirth, S.B., 2013, Williston Basin Province—Stratigraphic and structural framework to a geologic assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources, chap. 2 of U.S. Geological Survey Williston Basin Province Assessment Team, Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources of the Williston Basin Province of North Dakota, Montana, and South Dakota, 2010 (ver. 1.1, November 2013): U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series 69–W, 17 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Province Boundary ...............................................................................................................................1 Physiography .........................................................................................................................................2 Stratigraphic Setting .....................................................................................................................................2 Major Sequences..................................................................................................................................3 Sauk................................................................................................................................................3 Tippecanoe....................................................................................................................................5 Kaskaskia ......................................................................................................................................5 Absaroka ......................................................................................................................................7 Zuni .................................................................................................................................................8 Tejas ...............................................................................................................................................8 Tectonics and Structural Setting .................................................................................................................8 Precambrian ..........................................................................................................................................8 Paleozoic Wrench Fault System .......................................................................................................10 Structure-Stratigraphic Model ........................................................................................................11 Carbonate System........................................................................................................................................12 Basin Production..........................................................................................................................................12 Assessment Results ....................................................................................................................................14 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................16 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................16 Figures 1. Map showing location and physiographic features of the Williston Basin Province ..............................................................................................................................2 2. Map showing thickness of Phanerozoic strata in the Williston Basin ................................3 3. Schematic diagram showing unconformity bounded slices of Phanerozoic strata in the Williston Basin. .......................................................................................................4 4. Diagram showing geologic time scale, major stratigraphic sequences, first- and second-order sea level curves, and ages of petroleum source and reservoir rocks in the Williston Basin ...............................................................................5 5. Generalized stratigraphic chart and associated total petroleum system for the Williston Basin ..................................................................................................................6 6. Maps showing Williston Basin depositional patterns of the Tippecanoe and lower Kaskaskia sequences ...............................................................................................7 7. Maps showing Precambrian structural and tectonic configuration of the Williston Basin and surrounding area .......................................................................................9 8. Structural configuration of the Williston Basin contoured on subsea elevations on top of the Red River Formation ........................................................................11 9. Diagram showing possible relation between lineaments mapped at the surface and fault configuration at depth ................................................................................12 10. Diagram showing oil and gas production in the Williston Basin ........................................13 11. Map showing oil and gas production distribution in the Williston Basin Province ............................................................................................................................14 Table 1. Williston Basin Province assessment results ........................................................................15 Williston Basin Province—Stratigraphic and Structural Framework to a Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources By Lawrence O. Anna, Richard Pollastro, Stephanie B. Gaswirth Abstract Montana (fig. 1). The assessment was based on geologic prin- ciples and applied the total petroleum system (TPS) concept. The U.S. Geological Survey completed an assessment of A TPS consists of one or more assessment units (AUs), which the undiscovered oil and gas potential of the Williston Basin are mappable parts of a petroleum system in which discovered in 2008. The assessment of undiscovered oil and gas used and undiscovered fields constitute a single, relatively homoge- the total petroleum system concept, which includes mapping neous population. The assessment methodology was based on the distribution of potential source rocks and known petro- the numerical simulation of the estimated number and sizes of leum accumulations and determining the timing of petroleum undiscovered fields. The TPS includes all genetically related generation and migration. This report is an introduction to the petroleum within a limited, mappable geologic space, along geologic features that were used to develop conceptual models with other essential mappable geologic elements (reservoir, used in the assessment process. The assessment focused on seal, and overburden rocks) that control the fundamental the geologic framework of the basin to determine the origin of processes of generation, expulsion, migration, entrapment, source and reservoir rocks, timing and type of tectonic events and preservation of petroleum (Magoon and Dow, 1994). and the configuration of resulting structures, formation of traps Assessment units are assessed individually depending on their and seals, and thermal history of the basin. homogeneity in terms of geology, exploration considerations, Six major stratigraphic sequences, each bounded by and geologic risk. major unconformities can be distinguished within the more This chapter describes the geologic framework for the than 16,000 ft of Phanerozoic rocks in the Williston Basin. Williston Basin and some of the conceptual models and guid- The influence of paleostructure on sedimentation is reflected by lithofacies
Recommended publications
  • L'.3350 Deposmon and DISSOLUTION of the MIDDLE DEVONIAN PRAIRIE FORMATION, Williston BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA and MONTANA By
    l'.3350 DEPOsmON AND DISSOLUTION OF THE MIDDLE DEVONIAN PRAIRIE FORMATION, WilLISTON BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA AND MONTANA by: Chris A. Oglesby T-3350 A thesis submined to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date f:" /2 7 /C''i::-- i ; Signed: Approved: Lee C. Gerhard Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado - 7 Date' .' Samuel S. Adams, Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering II T-3350 ABSTRACf Within the Williston basin, thickness variations of the Prairie Formation are common and are interpreted to originate by two processes, differential accumulation of salt during deposition, and differential removal of salt by dissolution. Unambiguous evidence for each process is rare because the Prairie/Winnipegosis interval is seldom cored within the U.S. portion of the basin. Therefore indirect methods, utilizing well logs, provide the principal method for identifying characteristics of the two processes. The results of this study indicate that the two processes can be distinguished using correlations within the Prairie Formation. Several regionally correlative upward-brining, and probably shoaling-upward sequences occur within the Prairie Formation .. Near the basin center, the lowermost sequence is transitional with the underlying Winnipegosis Formation. This transition is characterized by thinly laminated carbonates that become increasingly interbedded with anhydrites of the basin-centered Ratner Member, the remainder of the sequence progresses up through halite and culminates in the halite-dominated Esterhazy potash beds. Two overlying sequences also brine upwards, however, these sequences lack the basal anhydrite and instead begin with halite and culminate in the Belle Plaine and Mountrail potash Members, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Paleozoic Sea Levels and Depositional Sequences Charles A
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR Geology Faculty Publications Geology 1987 Late Paleozoic Sea Levels and Depositional Sequences Charles A. Ross Western Washington University, [email protected] June R. P. Ross Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs Part of the Geology Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Ross, Charles A. and Ross, June R. P., "Late Paleozoic Sea Levels and Depositional Sequences" (1987). Geology Faculty Publications. 61. https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs/61 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geology at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 24, 1987. LATE PALEOZOIC SEA LEVELS AND DEPOSITIONAL SEQUENCES CHARLES A. ROSSI AND JUNE R. P. ROSS2 1 Chevron U.S.A., Inc.,P. O. BOX 1635, Houston, TX 77251 2 Department of Biology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225 ABSTRACT studies on these changes in sea level and their paleogeographic distribution (Ross, 1979; Ross Cyclic sea level charts for the Lower and Ross, 1979, 1981a, 1981b, 1985a, 1985b) are Carboniferous (Mississippian), Middle and Upper elaborated on in this paper with charts in a Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian), and Permian show similar format to that used for Mesozoic and considerable variability in the duration and Cenozoic sea-level cyclic fluctuations by Haq, magnitude of third-order depositional sequences, Hardenbol, and Vail (1987 and this volume). and also in the position of general sea level as represented by second-order sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary Report on Paleozoic Stratigraphy, Mapping and Hydrocarbon A
    Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary report on Paleozoic stratigraphy, mapping and GP2008-2 hydrocarbon assessment, southwestern Manitoba By M.P.B. Nicolas and D. Barchyn GEOSCIENTIFIC PAPER Geoscientific Paper GP2008-2 Williston Basin Project (Targeted Geoscience Initiative II): Summary report on Paleozoic stratigraphy, mapping and hydrocarbon assessment, southwestern Manitoba by M.P.B. Nicolas and D. Barchyn Winnipeg, 2008, reprinted with minor revisions January, 2009 Science, Technology, Energy and Mines Mineral Resources Division Hon. Jim Rondeau John Fox Minister Assistant Deputy Minister John Clarkson Manitoba Geological Survey Deputy Minister E.C. Syme Director ©Queen’s Printer for Manitoba, 2008, reprinted with minor revisions, January 2009 Every possible effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this report, but Manitoba Science, Technol- ogy, Energy and Mines does not assume any liability for errors that may occur. Source references are included in the report and users should verify critical information. Any digital data and software accompanying this publication are supplied on the understanding that they are for the sole use of the licensee, and will not be redistributed in any form, in whole or in part, to third parties. Any references to proprietary software in the documentation and/or any use of proprietary data formats in this release do not constitute endorsement by Manitoba Science, Technology, Energy and Mines of any manufacturer’s product. When using information from this publication in other publications or presentations, due acknowledgment should be given to the Manitoba Geological Survey. The following reference format is recommended: Nicolas, M.P.B, and Barchyn, D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stonewall Formation Timothy O
    The Stonewall Formation Timothy O. Nesheim Introduction Geology The Stonewall Formation is one of numerous sedimentary strata The Stonewall Formation consists of three carbonate-evaporitic that have commercially produced oil and gas from North Dakota’s cycles deposited during Late Ordovician through Early Silurian subsurface. The Stonewall Formation is also one of many time (fig. 2). The Stonewall Formation is conformably under- geological formations being overshadowed by the prolific Bakken- lain by the Stony Mountain Formation and overlain by the In- Three Forks play. Interestingly, the first successful production terlake Formation. Each Stonewall cycle consists of three gen- test that recovered hydrocarbons (oil and gas) from the eral lithofacies: 1) bioturbated to laminated carbonate mudstone Stonewall Formation took place in 1952, less than a year after the 2) thin greyish green dolomitic and/or shaley, silty to sandy discovery of oil in North Dakota. However, sustained commercial mudstone, and 3) nodular to laminated anhydrite that is some- production from the Stonewall Formation did not take place for times interlaminated to interbedded with dolomite (fig. 3). another 27 years until 1979. Since then, the Stonewall Formation Deposition is interpreted to have taken place within a shallow has produced approximately 10 million barrels of oil equivalent marine (carbonate facies) to hypersaline (anhydrite facies) set- (MBOE) from 65 vertical wells (fig. 1). ting. The shaly sandy mudstone intervals have previously been Figure 1. Map depicting the extent of the Stonewall Formation and Stonewall productive wells in North Dakota (Carlson and Eastwood, 1962). For regulatory reasons the Stonewall Formation has been pooled together with the lower Interlake Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Conodont Biostratigraphy of the Bakken and Lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota Timothy P
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects 1986 Conodont biostratigraphy of the Bakken and lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota Timothy P. Huber University of North Dakota Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Huber, Timothy P., "Conodont biostratigraphy of the Bakken and lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota" (1986). Theses and Dissertations. 145. https://commons.und.edu/theses/145 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE BAKKEN AND LOWER LODGEPOLE FORMATIONS (DEVONIAN AND MISSISSIPPIAN), WILLISTON BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA by Timothy P, Huber Bachelor of Arts, University of Minnesota - Morris, 1983 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota December 1986 This thesis submitted by Timothy P. Huber in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science from the University of North Dakota has been read by the Faculty Advisory Committee under whom the work has been done, and is hereby approved. This thesis meets the standards for appearance and conforms to the style and format requirements of the Graduate School at the University of North Dakota and is hereby approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Section of Paleozoic Rocks of Western North Dakota
    JolfN P. BLOEMLE N. D. Geological Survey NORTH DAKOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WILSON M. LAIRD, State Geologist Miscel1aneous Series No. 34 CROSS-SECTION OF PALEOZOIC ROCKS OF WESTERN NORTH DAKOTA BY CLARENCE G. CARLSON Reprinted from Stratigraphic Cross Section of Paleozoic Rocks-Oklahoma to Saskatchewan, 1967: The American Association of Petroleum Geologists Cross Section Publication 5, p. 13-15, 1 Plate Grand Forks, North Dakota, 1967 NORTH DAKOTAI (Section E-F. Plate 5) C. G. CARLSON' Grand Forks, North Dakota INTRODUCTION which, in ascending order, are the Black Island, Icebox, The North Dakota segment of the cross section was and Roughlock. The Black Island generally consists of constructed with the base of the Spearfish Formation as clean quartzose sandstone, the Icebox of greenish-gray, noncalcareous shale, and the Roughlock of greenish-gray the datum. However, the Permian-Triassic boundary to brownish-gray, calcareous shale or siltstone. now is thought to be within redbeds of the Spearfish The Black Island and Icebox Formations can be Formation (Dow, 1964). If this interpretation is cor­ traced northward to Saskatchewan, but they have not rect, perhaps as much as 300 ft of Paleozoic rocks in been recognized as formations there and are included in well 3 and smaller thicknesses in wells I, 2, and 4-12 an undivided Winnipeg Formation. The Black Island are excluded from Plate 5. pinches out southwestward because of nondeposition Wells were selected which best illustrate the Paleozo­ along the Cedar Creek anticline, but the Icebox and ic section and its facies changes in the deeper part of Roughlock Formations, although not present on the the Williston basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic Evolution of the Appalachians
    Paleozoic Evolution of the Appalachians: Tectonic Overview Three major tectonic episodes, all involving lateral accretion of terranes: deformation, terrane migration, accretion, and continental convergence 1. Ordovician Taconic Orogeny (~470-440 Ma) • collision of Laurentian margin with one or more magmatic arcs Shelburne Falls arc (475-470 Ma) and Bronson Hill arc (454-442 Ma) • or, continent-continent collision between Laurentia and proto-Andean region of Gondwana • slope & rise sediments thrust westward over shelf deposits 2. Devonian Acadian Orogeny (~420-360 Ma) • accretion of Avalon terrane southward continuation of Silurian Caledonian Orogeny (NW Europe) collision of Baltica with Laurentia to form Laurussia • deformation of Bronson Hill arc and sedimentary basins seaward of BH arc at least 3 pulses of deformation • oblique accretion of Avalon and other terranes(?) much strike-slip displacement but also subduction (coastal volcanics) • large mountains erosion creates thick clastic wedge (Catskills and Poccono Mtns.); thinned westward toward cratonic interior 3. Pennsylvansylvanian-Permian Alleghenian Orogeny (~325- 275 Ma) • collision with Gondwanaland consolidation of supercontinent Pangea • extensive zone of deformation New England - Georgia & Alabama (Appalachian Mtns.) - Oklahoma, Arkansas (Ouachita Mtns.) - Texas (Marathon Mtns.) • side-effects: deep crustal shear in Mass., formation of Narragansett rift basin basement block faulting in western interior, uplift of ancestral Rockies "TECTONIC CYCLES" • recorded by the creation of foreland basins sedimentation in eastern New York • associated with tectonic uplift and deformation due to the accretion of island arcs to the east in Massachusetts (first the Ordovician Taconic Orogeny followed by the Devonian Acadian Orogeny: Ordovician Taconic Orogeny (generalized succession in eastern NY) Age Environment Lithology Formation late Ordovician deltaic and molasse Queenston Fm.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Depositional Environment of the Upper Mississippian Big Snowy Group in the Bridger Range, Southwest Montana By
    Stratigraphy and depositional environment of the Upper Mississippian Big Snowy Group in the Bridger Range, southwest Montana by Gary Eich Guthrie A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Science Montana State University © Copyright by Gary Eich Guthrie (1984) Abstract: The Big Snowy Group is restricted to a trough which extends from southwest Montana into the Williston basin. Thickness variation of the group on the southern margin of the trough reflects movement of structural elements along an ancient structural weakness located in the central Bridget Range. Field and petrographic data are integrated to determine the depositional environment and stratigraphy of the group and to document the tectonic influence on sedimentation along this zone. The group is divided into the Kibbey Formation, with two informal members, and the Lombard facies of the Heath Formation. The lower Kibbey is supratidal algal laminated dolostone with dessication features and evaporite solution breccias were deposited at the leading edge of the transgressing Big Snowy sea. Siliciclastic intertidal channels on the sabkha are restricted to the central range where subsidence was greatest. The upper Kibbey and Lombard facies provide further evidence of a trough in the central Bridgers. The upper Kibbey is a regressive shoreface deposit composed of fine grained sandstone at the northern and southern ends of the range. Mudstone and siltstone dominate in the center of the range where deeper water and lower energy conditions prevailed. Ultimately, the Kibbey shoreface transgressed out of the area and the Lombard facies was deposited in a partially restricted shelf lagoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Fox Hills Formation (Late Cretaceous
    GEOLOGY OF THE FOX HILLS FORMATION (LATE CRETACEOUS) IN THE WILLISTON BASIN OF NORTH DAKOTA, WITH REFERENCE TO URANIUM POTENTIAL by A. M. CVANCARA UNNERSITY OF NORTIl DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY GRAND FORKS, NORTII DAKOTA 58202 REPORT OF INVESTIGATION NO. 5S NORTH DAKOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY E. A. Noble, State Geologist 1976 PREPARED FOR mE U.S. ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION GRAND JUNCTION OFFICE UNDER CONTRACT NO. AT(05-1)-1633 G1O-1633-1 CONTENTS ABSTRACT ~ag~ INTRODUCTION . 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .... 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2 STRATIGRAPHY ......................... .. .. 2 Definition and relationship to other rock units .. 2 Distribution . .. 3 Lithology and sedimentary structures .. 3 Persistence of lithologic units ... .. 7 Contacts .. ... .. .. ., 7 Thickness . .. ... .. 8 STRUcrURE ... 8 PALEONTOLOGY . 9 Fossil groups . 9 Occurrence of fossils · ..... , 9 AGE AND CORRELATION 10 DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS .............................. 10 URANIUM POTENTIAL . · 12 General . .. ., 12 Fox Hills Formation . 13 REFERENCES . · 14 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Fox Hills and adjacent Formations in North Dakota (modified from Carlson, 1973) . 4 2. Schematic stratigraphic column of Fox Hills Formation in North Dakota (modified slightly from Erickson, 1974, p. 144). The Linton Member was named by Klett and Erickson (1976). 5 Plate 1. Northwest-southeast cross section (Dunn to Sioux Counties) of Fox Hills Formation in southwestern North Dakota . (in pocket) 2. Southwest-northeast cross section (Bowman to Pierce Counties) of Fox Hills Formation in western North Dakota (in pocket) 3. Southwest-northeast cross section (Adams to Burleigh Counties) of Fox Hills Formation in southwestern North Dakota (in pocket) 4. Isopach map of Fox Hills Formation in North Dakota (in pocket) ABSTRACT model is followed for the deposition of Fox Hills sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Deadwood Formation: Isopach
    Natural Resources Ressources naturelles Manitoba Science, Technology, Canada Canada Energy and Mines 19 48 Petroleum O O 106 00’ 0 96 00’ 0 O O O O 0 0 0 104 98 0 55 30’ O O 55 30’ 102 0 100 0 East Paint Lake Park Reserve Lac La Ronge La Ronge 70 6 O O 55 0 55 0 25 Snow Lake 106 Manitoba 25 Flin Flon 75 Saskatchewan 65 50 100 125 Grass River Provincial Park 150 39 2 125 75 50 150 60 225 10 175 Narrow Hills O O 54 0 Clearwater Lake Provincial Park 54 0 6 106 55 200 The Pas 250 Lake 50 Nipawin 55 Prince Albert Carrot River 225 Wildcat Hill Winnipeg 175 Poplar/Nanowin Rivers Park Reserve O O 53 0 53 0 60 45 Melfort Tisdale Hudson Bay 3 125 200 50 150 6 Greenwater Lake 40 6 100 10 75 Chitek Lake Park Reserve Birch Island Park Reserve Humboldt 9 Kelvington O 35 Swan River O 52 0 16 52 0 125 Wadena 2 Preeceville 175 Lanigan 75 50 Fisher Bay Park Reserve 16 Wynyard Watrous 30 Foam Lake 10 Canora Duck Mountain Provincial Park Kamsack 25 Good Spirit Lake 16 35 Davidson 150 Hecla/Grindstone Provincial Park 6 25 175 Yorkton Roblin 11 Dauphin 100 O O 51 0 51 0 175 16 Melville Riding Mountain National Park 150 Langenburg 200 20 Fort Qu’Appelle Russell 10 125 Lumsden Gimli 11 Buffalo Pound Esterhazy 100 75 Indian Head 1 Pilot Butte Balgonie 1 Regina 1 Moose Jaw 16 1 150 8 Grenfell 50 25 15 Lac du Bonnet 125 59 6 1 Minnedosa 125 Neepawa 16 Selkirk 100 Stonewall 175 Beausejour Moosomin 44 O Kipling O 50 0 Birds Hill Provincial Park 50 0 100 75 Rivers 25 Portage la Prairie 1 39 Winnipeg 15 10 1 Carberry Moose Mountain Virden Brandon 1 175 Spruce Woods Provincial Park Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes
    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician Stony Mountain Formation: Structure Contour
    Natural Resources Ressources naturelles Manitoba Science, Technology, Canada Canada Energy and Mines 19 48 Petroleum O O 106 00’ 0 96 00’ 0 O O O O 0 0 0 104 98 0 55 30’ O O 55 30’ 102 0 100 0 East Paint Lake Park Reserve Lac La Ronge La Ronge 70 6 O O 55 0 55 0 Snow Lake 106 Manitoba Flin Flon Saskatchewan 65 Grass River Provincial Park 39 2 300 300 300 60 10 200 Narrow Hills O 200 O 54 0 Clearwater Lake Provincial Park 54 0 200 6 100 106 55 100 The Pas 0 200 200 0 -100 Lake 50 0 Nipawin 55 100 Prince Albert -200 Carrot River Wildcat Hill Winnipeg Poplar/Nanowin Rivers Park Reserve O O 53 0 53 0 60 -300 45 -100 -400 Melfort -200 Tisdale Hudson Bay 3 -300 -400 200 -200 0 -500 6 Greenwater Lake 40 0 6 100 -600 10 -300 Chitek Lake Park Reserve Birch Island Park Reserve -100 Humboldt -400 9 -200 200 100 Kelvington -500 O 35 Swan River O 52 0 16 52 0 -800 -400 Wadena Lake St. Martin 2 Preeceville Structure -700 Lanigan -300 0 Wynyard Fisher Bay Park Reserve 16 Watrous Foam Lake 10 30 -900 -600 Canora -800 Duck Mountain Provincial Park Kamsack Highrock Structure Good Spirit Lake -700 16 200 35 100 -1000 -200 -900 Davidson -500 Hecla/Grindstone Provincial Park 6 25 Yorkton Roblin -1100 -1000 11 -300 Dauphin O O 51 0 51 0 -800 -700 -300 16 -400 100 Melville -1100 -500 Riding Mountain National Park -1200 Langenburg 20 Fort Qu’Appelle -1000 -600 Russell 10 -900 Lumsden Gimli 11 Buffalo Pound Esterhazy -1200 -1300 Indian Head 1 -900 Pilot Butte Balgonie 1 Regina -100 1 Moose Jaw 16 1 -700 -1000 8 Grenfell -1300 15 59 Lac du Bonnet -1400 0 -1100 6 -800 1 Minnedosa Neepawa -1400 16 Selkirk Stonewall Beausejour -1200 Moosomin 44 -1500 -700 -300 O Kipling 100 O 50 0 Birds Hill Provincial Park 50 0 Rivers 200 -400 Portage la Prairie 1 -1600 -1300 15 -1500 39 -1200 Winnipeg 10 -800 -1600 1 -1000 Carberry -200 -1400 Moose Mountain Virden Brandon -100 -1700 1 Spruce Woods Provincial Park Ste.
    [Show full text]