Growth Or Recession: Which to Expect? Sixth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Growth Or Recession: Which to Expect? Sixth GROWTH OR RECESSION: WHICH TO EXPECT? SIXTH INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL UNIVERSITY FORUM PROGRAM Tues., 26 November 2019 Lobby, 2nd floor, Leningradsky 9:00-10:00 Registration Prospekt, 51, bld. 1 10:00-12:40 Plenary session Leningradsky Prospekt, 51, Welcoming address by: bld.1, Assembly Mikhail Eskindarov, Rector, Financial University under the Hall Government of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Honored Scholar of the Russian Federation; Member, Russian Academy of Education; Discussion participants Anton Siluanov, First Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation; Minister, Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; Dean, Faculty of Finance and Economics, Financial University; Aleksei Kudrin, Chairman of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation; Aleksandr Shokhin, President, Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs; Aleksandr Sergeiev, President, Russian Academy of Sciences; Boris Titov, Presidential Commissioner for Entrepreneurs' Rights; Aleksandr Buksman, First Deputy Attorney General of the of the Russian Federation; Aleksandr Braverman, Director-General, Federal Corporation for the Development of SMEs; Vladimir Rashevsky, Director-General, SUEK AO; Kseniya Yudaeva, First Deputy Chairperson, Central Bank of the Russian Federation Mikhail Aleskeyev, Chairman of the Board, UniCreditBank; Joseph E. Stiglitz, holder of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences (2001); Moderator N.I. Korzhenevsky, economic journalist, Russia24 channel 12:30-12:45 Quality of Life Financial University Award ceremony 12:45-13:00 Financial University and overseas partners agreement signing ceremony 13:00-14:00 Break 14:00-16:00 Open lecture by Joseph E. Stiglitz, holder of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences (2001) 16:30 -17:30 Gala Concert Wed., 27 November 2019 10:00-13:00 Session Leningradky Why Does the World Economy Slow Down Prospekt, 49, Minor Hall Moderators S.Yu. Glazyev, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Commissioner for Integration and Macroeconomics, Eurasian Economic Commission; member, Russian Academy of Sciences; M.Yu. Golovnin, Doctor of Economics, Professor, First Deputy Director for Research, Institute of Economics, corresponding member, Russian Academy of Sciences; Contact information: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Speakers: M. Yu. Alekseyev, Doctor of Economics, Chairman of the Board, UniCredit Bank; Dr. Antonio Fidel Romero Gómez, Dean, Faculty of Economics, University of Havana, Cuba; A.I. Bazhan, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head, Department of Economic Research, Institute of European Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences; Prof. Grigoris Zarotiadis, Professor, Dean, Faculty of Economic and Political Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Greece); E. A. Zvonova, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head, Department of the World Economy and World Finance, Financial University Ya. A. Kabakov, PhD (Economics), Financial Advisor, FINAM Holdings; Ismini Kriari, Rector, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Greece; A.V. Kuznetsov, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Senior Research Fellow, Department of World Economy and World Finance, Financial University; P. A. Medvedev, Doctor of Economics, financial ombudsman; Ya.M. Mirkin, Professor, Doctor of Economics, Head, Department of International Capital Markets, Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences; V.Ya. Pishchik, Professor, Doctor of Economics, Research Director, Department of World Economy and World Finance, Financial University; Salvador Pérez Alcaraz, Professor, Department of Legal Sciences, Polytechnic University of Cartagena, Spain; 2 M.A. Portnoy, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Lead Research Fellow, Institute for the Study of USA and Canada, Russian Academy of Sciences; D.V. Razumovsky, PhD (Economics), acting Director, Institute of Latin American Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences; S.A. Roginko, PhD (Economics), Head, Center for Environment Protection and Development, Institute of European Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences; D.E. Sorokin, Professor, Doctor of Economics, Research Director, Head, Department of Economic Theory, Financial University, corresponding member, Russian Academy of Sciences; Andras Horvai, former World Bank’s Country Director and Resident Representative for the Russian Federation (2015-2019), Hungary; José Luis Iriarte Ángel, Professor, Public University of Navarra, Spain Topics for discussion 1. Why does the world economy slow down? Is it the end of the financial globalization model or the cyclical recession of the world economy? 2. The global imbalance growth in the world economy and the global financial markets. Should we expect the burst of the global debt bubble? 3. Economic wars in the trade sector, foreign exchange market, customs sector, commodity and raw materials market; 4. The polycentrism trend and the increasing impact made by the regions upon the global economy. Are there any European integration development prospects, given the Brexit procedure? 5. USA’s opposition to the geo-economic leadership demonstrated by the most successful developing countries. Is there any room for compromise? 6. A crisis of modern institutions and mechanisms that support sustainable economic growth. How can we accelerate the world’s economy growth? 10:00-13:00 Session Leningradky Technological Leadership Drivers Prospekt, 55 (in partnership with Stretegicheskiye Resheniya i Risk Cinema and Menedzhment (Strategic Solutions and Risk Management) Concert Hall journal) Moderator I.A. Yermakov, Head, Department of Strategic Management, ROSATOM; A.V. Trachuk, Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Director-General, Goznak; Head, Department of Management, Financial University Contact information: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 3 Speakers Ye. O. Adamov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Research Director, Dollezhal Research and Development Institute of Power Engineering, member, Russian Academy of Engineering; F.V. Veselov, PhD (Economics), Deputy Director for Research, Head, Department of the Scientific Basis of the Energy System Development, Energy Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences; Giuseppe Valditara, Professor of Private Roman Law, Department of Law, University of Turin, Head, Department of Higher Education and Research under the Ministry of Education, University and Research, Italy; A.D. Kaprin, Doctor of Medicine, Director-General, National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, member, Russian Academy of Sciences; M.I. Kovalchuk, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, President, Kurchatov Institute National Research Center, corresponding member, Russian Academy of Sciences; O.V. Krivosheyev, Deputy Director for IT and Product Lifecycle Management, Russian Federal Nuclear Center of the All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics; M.N. Strikhanov, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Rector, National Research Nuclear University (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute) Topics for discussion 1. Nuclear technology and methods to be used to turn them into the new types of business operations. 2. The economic effect of introducing nuclear technology in the Russian economy and the technology exports development. 3. Nuclear technology used to support for human life and peoples’ health. Social effects of nuclear technology: education, healthcare, spatial development. 4. Nuclear technology used to ensure manufacturing process efficiency. 5. Nuclear energy as a clean, reliable and affordable type of energy. 6. Nuclear technology used for sustainable development: the environment protection. 10:00-13:00 Session Leningradky New Finance for the New World Prospekt, 49 Auditorium Moderators M.A. Fedotova, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head, Department of Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance, Financial University; A.A. Khandruyev, Vice-President, Association of Russian Regional Banks Speakers: 4 M. A. Abramova, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of Financial Markets and Banks, Lead Research Fellow, Center for Monetary Relations, Financial University; A.G. Aksakov, State Duma Committee for Financial Markets; Alberto Franco Pozzolo, Professor of Political Economy, Department of Law, Roma Tre University, Italy; S. A. Andryushin, Economic Theory Section Head, Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences; S.N. Blinov, Head, Macroeconomic Research Unit, KAMAZ; S.L. Bondarchuk, Deputy Head, Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation; M.Yu. Vasilyev, President, Association of Financial Analysts and Risk Managers; V.A. Gamza, PhD (Economics), PhD (Law), Chairman, Committee for Financial Markets and Lending Institutions, Chamber of Industry and Commerce of the Russian Federation; partner, Audit Group, FalconFinance, YuFK; O.A. Goncharova, Director, Non-Lending Institutions’ Data Collection and Statements Processing Department, Central Bank of Russia; Daniele Bracchi, counsel lawyer, Agnoli & Giuggioli Legal Studio, Italy; Charles Giacoma, Director-General, European Institute for Export Compliance (EIFEC), Brussels, Belgium; Carlos Galán Cordero, Professor, Charles III University of Madrid, Spain; V.V. Zimin, counselor, Central Bank of the Russian Federation; A.Kh. Metov, Head, Department for Economics and Company Budgeting, ROSCOSMOS; Nikolaos G. Papaioannou, Rector, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece; R.A. Prokhorov, Chairman of the Board, Association of Financial Innovation; B.B. Rubtsov, Doctor of Economics,
Recommended publications
  • RUSSIA Gujarat Technological University in Partial Fulfillment Of
    A GLOBAL / COUNTRY STUDY AND REPORT ON RUSSIA SUBMITTED TO Gujarat Technological University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement of the Award for the Degree of Master of Business Administration Under the Faculty Guide: Mr. Sunil Prajapati, MS. Selvy Palmer and Ms. Sashikala Munka Submitted by: Enrollment No. 107550592062 to 107550592121 MBA SEMESTER -IV Sardar Patel College of Administration & Management (SPCAM-MBA) Approved by All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), New Delhi AFFILIATED WITH GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, AHMEDABAD SPEC Campus, Vidhyanagar-Vadtal Road Bakrol-388315, Anand (Gujarat) May, 2012 1 STUDENTS DECLARATION We enrollment no. 107550592062 to 107550592121 Students of SARDAR PATEL COLLEGE OF ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT (SPCAM-MBA) Bakrol,, hereby declare that the report for A GLOBAL / COUNTRY STUDY REPORT ON Spain is a result of our own work and our indebtedness to other work publications, references, if any, have been duly acknowledged. Place : .. Date : 2 PREFACE In today’s competitive environment, survival of the fittest is the new motto. That is why it’s necessary that the theoretical knowledge is accompanied by practical knowledge. In an MBA programmer, project study forms an important and an integral part. It helps in bridging the gap between the two main important aspects the theoretical as well practical knowledge. “Knowledge and Human Power are synonyms”, once said the great philosopher Francis Bacon. However based on the experience within today’s global markets, he would probably say, “The ability to capture, communicate & leverage knowledge to solve problems is human power”. This raises the question how exactly one can best capture, communicate & leverage knowledge, especially within world of system engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • EMERGING VERSUS AGING ECONOMIES Department Of
    CHANGING WORLD ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SCENARIO: EMERGING VERSUS AGING ECONOMIES This thesis is submitted as a partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Ph.D in Economics Research Scholar: Abdul Ghafoor Awan Supervisor:- Prof.Dr. Rana Ejaz Ali Khan, Department of Economics Islamia University of Bahawalpur-Pakistan ABSTRACT Introduction: The dawn of 21st century has changed the scene of the world economy and shifted the Centre of economic growth from Western hemisphere to the Asian Continent. The global financial crisis of 2008 and European debt crisis of 2010 have exposed inherent weak- ness of G-7 economies, which are facing the challenges of twin deficits, falling productivity, rising debts and aging population. In contrast, the emerging economies particularly, China, India and Brazil, have shown robust economic growth during 2000-2010. China’s fast economic growth since 1960s was the result of gradual shift in its economic system, open door policy and its accession to the world trade organization. The institutional reforms and access to foreign markets has been followed by investment strategies expanded 45% of Chinese GDP during last 40 years. The consistent vertical economic growth has no precedent in the economic history of the world. China has increased its share in world trade from 0.5% in 1960 to 10% in 2010 and accumulated foreign exchange reserves of US$3.19 trillion by March 2013. It is not less than a miracle. Objectives: The objective of this dissertation is to measure the changes taken place in world economy during 2000-2010 and its impact on assets allocation, employment labour productivity, poverty, and allocation of resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Economy of Russia. History 14.01.2019
    Economy of Russia Alina Shcherbakova, PhD, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia You can't understand Russia with your mind, You can't measure it with the standard instruments: This country has a particular status – In Russia you can only trust. Fyodor Tyutchev The economy of Russia is the eleventh largest economy in the world by nominal value. Russia has an abundance of natural gas, oil, coal, and precious metals. It is also rich in agriculture. Russia has undergone significant changes since the collapse of the Soviet Union, moving from a centrally planned economy to a more market- based and globally integrated economy. 7 Periods of Russian History in XX-XXI C • Tsar Nikolai II – till 1917 • Revolution and Civil war – 1917- 1920 • Recovery – 1920 – 1928 • Stalin’s industrialization – 1930-1941 • WW II – 1939 – 1945; USSR and USA –1941-1945 • Reindustrialization – 1945 – 1990 • Transition crisis – 1990 – 1998 • Slow recovery – 1999 – 2002 • Oil prices up and fast growth – 2002-2008 • Slow growth – 2009 - 2018 Key problems of the Russian history Millennium+ with no peace, regular wars… Big wars – Borders = Pattern of surrounding Revolution and XX C. = series of Catastrophes Crush of the SU aggravated all crises… - three transformations: state, ideology, ownership. 1990-s - shock for people and change of elites. People have fixed feelings on external danger. Russian Elite behaves like other Great Elites. “Declared Loser” now resists new rules, Cold war. 6 What exactly has to be transformed during a country transition? The most crucial
    [Show full text]
  • China Dream, Space Dream: China's Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States
    China Dream, Space Dream 中国梦,航天梦China’s Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States A report prepared for the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Kevin Pollpeter Eric Anderson Jordan Wilson Fan Yang Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Dr. Patrick Besha and Dr. Scott Pace for reviewing a previous draft of this report. They would also like to thank Lynne Bush and Bret Silvis for their master editing skills. Of course, any errors or omissions are the fault of authors. Disclaimer: This research report was prepared at the request of the Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission's website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.-China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 108-7. However, it does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission or any individual Commissioner of the views or conclusions expressed in this commissioned research report. CONTENTS Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
    [Show full text]
  • Human Spaceflight Plans of Russia, China and India
    Presentation to the Secure World Foundation November 3, 2011 by Marcia S. Smith Space and Technology Policy Group, LLC and SpacePolicyOnline.com “Civil” Space Activities in Russia “Civil” space activities Soviet Union did not distinguish between “civil” and “military” space programs until 1985 Line between the two can be quite blurry For purposes of this presentation, “civil” means Soviet/Russian activities analogous to NASA and NOAA (though no time to discuss metsats today) Roscosmos is Russian civil space agency. Headed by Army General (Ret.) Vladimir Popovkin Recent reports of $3.5 billion budget, but probably does not include money from US and others 11-03-11 2 Key Points to Take Away Space cooperation takes place in the broad context of U.S.-Russian relations Russia may not be a superpower today, but it is a global power and strategically important to the United States Complex US-Russian relationship, as New START and INKSNA demonstrate Russian space program modest by Soviet standards, but Retains key elements Leverages legacy capabilities for current activities and commercial gain Is a global launch service provider from four launch sites from Arctic to equator Proud history of many space “firsts,” but also tragedies and setbacks U.S.-Soviet/Russian civil space relationship has transitioned from primarily competition to primarily cooperation/interdependence today Cooperation not new, dates back to 1963, but much more intensive today U.S. is dependent on Russia for some things, but they also need us Bold dreams endure as Mars 500 demonstrates 11-03-11 3 Today is 54th Anniversary of First Female in Space 11-03-11 4 Just One of Many “Firsts” First satellite (Sputnik, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities of Aquatic Organisms in the System Of
    Natural Resources Conservation and Research (2019) Volume 2 doi:10.24294/nrcr.v2i1.750 Communities of Aquatic Organisms in the System of Ecological Monitoring of Streams at the Vostochny Cosmodrome (Russia) Bezmaternykh D.M.*, Kirillov V.V., Vinokurova G.V., Vdovina O.N., Ermolaeva N.I., Zarubina E. Yu., Kotovschikov A. V., Mitrofanova E. Yu., Puzanov A. V.e Institute for Water and Environmental Problems SB RAS, Barnaul, Russia, [email protected] ABSTRACT The current data on the ecological state of streams at the launch site of the Vostochny Cosmodrome with the use of biological indicators are presented. Recommendations on the surface water biomonitoring of the cosmodrome and the booster rocket drop zones are given. It is shown that the system of biological monitoring of the cosmodrome, as a part of the Roscosmos environmental monitoring, should be coordinated with the Roshydromet monitoring. Keywords: Bioindication; Biomonitoring; the Vostochny Cosmodrome; Zeya River Basin 1. Introduction The Vostochny Cosmodrome is a new Russian spaceport in the Amur Oblast, in the Russian Far East. Its construction began in 2011, and in April 2016 it was put into operation[1]. The launch site of the cosmodrome is located in the Zeya river basin. 1.1. Object of research The river network of the launch site is represented mainly by small rivers. The site partly includes the watersheds of the Zeya first- and second-order tributaries (Bolshaya Pera, Ora and Dzhatva rivers). Besides, there are watersheds of other first-order right tributaries of the Zeya (Galchikha, Kamenushka, Iur rivers, and Iversky stream), and the first-order tributaries of Bolshaya Pera river (Zolotoy, Serebryany, Medny streams) and Ora river (Okhotnichy and Nikolaevsky streams).
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Space Transportation: 2011 Year in Review
    Commercial Space Transportation: 2011 Year in Review COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION: 2011 YEAR IN REVIEW January 2012 HQ-121525.INDD 2011 Year in Review About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/ AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/. Cover: Art by John Sloan (2012) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation CONTENTS Introduction . .1 Executive Summary . .2 2011 Launch Activity . .3 WORLDWIDE ORBITAL LAUNCH ACTIVITY . 3 Worldwide Launch Revenues . 5 Worldwide Orbital Payload Summary . 5 Commercial Launch Payload Summaries . 6 Non-Commercial Launch Payload Summaries . 7 U .S . AND FAA-LICENSED ORBITAL LAUNCH ACTIVITY . 9 FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Summary . 9 U .S . and FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Activity in Detail .
    [Show full text]
  • ГНПРКЦ «ЦСКБ-Прогресс» State Research and Production Space
    ГНПРКЦ «ЦСКБ-ПРоГРеСС» State ReSeaRch and PRoduction SPace Rocket centeR tsSkB-PRogReSS «ЦСКБ-ПрогреСС» Бьет реКорды Самарский ракетно-космический центр «ЦСКБ-Прогресс» рассчи- тывает в этом году увеличить количество запусков собственных ракет до 22, что в 1,5 раза выше показателей прошлого года. CУже в первом полугодии с разных космодромов было запущено десять самарских ракет, семь из них — с космодрома Байконур, две — с космодрома Плесецк, и одна — из Гвианского космического Центра (Южная Америка). Для сравнения, в 2012 году состоялось 14 пусков ракет-носителей производства «ЦСКБ-Прогресс». «Это серьезная загрузка предприятия — и в плане ритмичности запусков, и в плане работы с различных космодромов, — рас- александр николаевич кирилин, генеральный директор сказывает генеральный директор ГНПРКЦ «ЦСКБ-Прогресс» Aleksandr N. Kirilin, Александр Кирилин. — В этом году мы собираемся установить General Director много рекордов. Например, мы обеспечили два запуска в ночь с 25 на 26 июня с разрывом чуть более часа: это пуск космиче- ”TsSKB-ProgreSS” SeTS recordS ского аппарата «Ресурс-П» с Байконура, и зарубежных спут- The Samara Space Center “TsSKB-Progress” plans increasing ников связи с космодрома Куру. Сегодня в мире нет ни одной number of launches of in-house rockets up to 22 this year that компании, которая обеспечивала бы такой ритм работы». it half as much as values for the previous year. Запуски космических аппаратов TenT Samarian rockets was already launched in the first half of the собственного производства year from different cosmodromes; seven of them — from cosmodrome «ЦСКБ-Прогресс» — один из мировых лидеров и ведущее Baikonur, two — from cosmodrome Plesetsk and one — from the российское предприятие по разработке, производству Guiana Space Center (South America).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Russia's Space Cooperation with China And
    ASSESSING RUSSIA’S SPACE COOPERATION WITH CHINA AND INDIA Opportunities and Challenges for Europe Report 12, June 2008 Charlotte MATHIEU, ESPI DISCLAIMER This Report has been prepared for the client in accordance with the associated contract and ESPI will accept no liability for any losses or damages arising out of the provision of the report to third parties. Short Title: ESPI Report 12, June 2008 Editor, Publisher: ESPI European Space Policy Institute A-1030 Vienna, Schwarzenbergplatz 6 Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel.: +43 1 718 11 18 - 0 Fax - 99 Copyright: © ESPI, June 2008 Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “source: © ESPI Report 12, June 2008. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. Price: 11,00 EUR Printed by ESA/ESTEC Layout and Design: M. A. Jakob/ESPI and Panthera.cc Ref.: C/20490-003-P13 Report 12, June 2008 2 Russia’s Space Cooperation with China and India Assessing Russia’s Space Cooperation with China and India – Opportunities and Challenges for Europe Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………….... 8 1. Russia in 2008.................................................................................................... 9 1.1. A stronger economy……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 1.2. An economy very dependent on the energy sector…………………………………………………… 10 1.3. Political stability…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 12 1.4. A new posture and the evolution towards a more balanced foreign policy……………… 12 2. Russia and Space……………………………………………………………………………………… 14 2.1. Space as a strategic asset…………………………………………………………………………………………… 14 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 6 Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
    Form 6 Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation FEDERAL STATE AUTONOMOUS EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PEOPLES’ FRIENDSHIP UNIVERSITY OF RUSSIA (PFUR) PROGRAM for increasing competitiveness of PEOPLES’ FRIENDSHIP UNIVERSITY OF RUSSIA among leading world educational and research centres in 2016–2020 Rector V.М. Filippov Moscow 2015 EXECUTED BY: 1. V.M. Filippov – Rector, D.Sc. (Physical and mathematical sciences), professor; 2. A.P. Efremov – First Vice-Rector, Vice-Rector for academic work, D.Sc. (Physical and mathematical sciences), professor; 3. E.L. Schesnyak – First Vice-Rector, Vice-Rector for economics and strategic development, D.Sc. (Economic sciences); 4. O.V. Andreeva – Vice-Rector for international activity, Ph.D. (Historical sciences); 5. A.D. Gladush – Vice-Rector for work with students, PhD. (Engineering sciences), associate professor; 6. A.V. Dolzhikova – Vice-Rector for continuing education, PhD. (Chemical sciences); 7. O.V. Ignatyev – Vice-Rector for informational and analytical work, D.Sc. (Engineering sciences), professor; 8. N.S. Kirabaev – Vice-Rector for research, D.Sc. (Philosophical sciences), professor; 9. E.V. Martynenko – Vice-Rector for PR, D.Sc. (Political sciences), professor; 10. S.V. Nazyuta – Vice-Rector for commercial activity; 11. V.F. Ponka – Vice-Rector for HR, D.Sc. (Laws), professor; 12. A.V. Zorin – Head of the Department of accountancy and financial control, PhD. (Physical and mathematical sciences), associate professor. Consultants: Jan Sadlak – IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence, President; Zoya Zaitseva – QS Intelligence Unit, Regional Director Central Europe & Central Asia; Dr Shadi Hijazi – QS Intelligence Unit, Senior Analyst; Hillol Nag – QS Intelligence Unit, Lead Analyst.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW CHINA HAS INTEGRATED ITS SPACE PROGRAM INTO ITS BROADER FOREIGN POLICY Dean Cheng
    HOW CHINA HAS INTEGRATED ITS SPACE PROGRAM INTO ITS BROADER FOREIGN POLICY Dean Cheng INTRODUCTION: CHINA AS A SPACE POWER Because of the way the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is governed, it is able to pursue a more holistic approach to policy. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) not only controls the government, but has a presence in every major organization, including economic, technical, and academic entities. Consequently, China is able to pursue not only a “whole of government” approach to policy, but a “whole of society” approach, incorporating elements that are often beyond the reach of other nations. This has meant that China has been able to use its space program to promote various aspects of its foreign policy, integrating it not only into traditional diplomatic and security efforts, but also trade and even industrial elements. Indeed, the incorporation of space elements into Chinese foreign policy thinking has been characteristic of China’s aerospace efforts from its earliest days. Where both Washington and Moscow’s space efforts were initially motivated in part by the desire to undertake surveillance missions, prestige played a much greater role in motivating the early phases of China’s space program. The senior Chinese leadership saw the development of space capabilities as reflecting on China’s place in the international order. Thus, in the wake of Sputnik, Chairman Mao Zedong advocated the creation of a Chinese space program. As he stated in May 1958, at the Second Plenum of the Eighth Party Congress, “we should also manufacture satellites.”1 The Chinese leadership, even in 1958, saw the ability to compete in aerospace as reflecting their broader place in the international environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Policy in the Global Space Industry's Lift-Off," Barry Law Review: Vol
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Barry University: Digital Commons @ Barry Law Barry Law Review Volume 19 Article 7 Issue 1 Fall 2013 2013 Law and Policy in the Global Space Industry's Lift- Off Claudia Pastorius Follow this and additional works at: https://lawpublications.barry.edu/barrylrev Part of the Air and Space Law Commons, International Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Claudia Pastorius (2013) "Law and Policy in the Global Space Industry's Lift-Off," Barry Law Review: Vol. 19 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://lawpublications.barry.edu/barrylrev/vol19/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Barry Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Barry Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Barry Law. : The Global Space Industry's Lift-Off LAW AND POLICY IN THE GLOBAL SPACE INDUSTRY’S LIFT-OFF Claudia Pastorius* PART I: INTRODUCTION—WHO OWNS SPACE? Would Hugo Grotius1 call for freedom of space? Would John Locke2 postulate that man will create value by the work of his hands in space and on celestial bodies and that this value carries with it an inherent right of ownership? When we look up with cosmic wonder, do we see spatium liberum,3 spatium nullius,4 or spatium communis5? Locke’s influential writings and labor theory of property have been used to justify colonization and property laws for centuries.6 Although he refers to the Earth,7 the heart of his principles is highly applicable to an inquiry of what space property law should be.
    [Show full text]