Value Foods in Maharajganj District, from . Which out of 289. Tmini AWCS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gandhi As Mahatma: Gorakhpur District, Eastern UP, 1921-2'
Gandhi as Mahatma 289 of time to lead or influence a political movement of the peasantry. Gandhi, the person, was in this particular locality for less than a day, but the 'Mahatma' as an 'idea' was thought out and reworked in Gandhi as Mahatma: popular imagination in subsequent months. Even in the eyes of some local Congressmen this 'deification'—'unofficial canonization' as the Gorakhpur District, Eastern UP, Pioneer put it—assumed dangerously distended proportions by April-May 1921. 1921-2' In following the career of the Mahatma in one limited area Over a short period, this essay seeks to place the relationship between Gandhi and the peasants in a perspective somewhat different from SHAHID AMIN the view usually taken of this grand subject. We are not concerned with analysing the attributes of his charisma but with how this 'Many miracles, were previous to this affair [the riot at Chauri registered in peasant consciousness. We are also constrained by our Chaura], sedulously circulated by the designing crowd, and firmly believed by the ignorant crowd, of the Non-co-operation world of primary documentation from looking at the image of Gandhi in this district'. Gorakhpur historically—at the ideas and beliefs about the Mahatma —M. B. Dixit, Committing Magistrate, that percolated into the region before his visit and the transformations, Chauri Chaura Trials. if any, that image underwent as a result of his visit. Most of the rumours about the Mahatma.'spratap (power/glory) were reported in the local press between February and May 1921. And as our sample I of fifty fairly elaborate 'stories' spans this rather brief period, we cannot fully indicate what happens to the 'deified' image after the Gandhi visited the district of Gorakhpur in eastern UP on 8 February rioting at Chauri Chaura in early 1922 and the subsequent withdrawal 1921, addressed a monster meeting variously estimated at between 1 of the Non-Co-operation movement. -
District Population Statistics, 32-Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh
I Census of India, 1951 DISTRICT POPULATllON STATiSTICS UTTAR PRADESH 32-GORAKHPUR DISTRICT ,I 315.42 \'LLAHAJ~AD : ~G AND STA;TIONERY. UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA 1951 1953 I GORDPS Price, Re.1-S. OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2011 [LIBRARY] Class No._ 315.42 Book No._ 1951 GOR DPS 21236 Accession No. ________ LED CASTES IN UTTAR PRADESH (1) Throughout the State- (1) Agariya (22) Bhuyiar (43) Kanjar (2) Badi (23) Boria (44) Kapariya (3) Badhik (24) Chamar (45) Karwal (4) Baheliya (25) Chero (46) Khaiz-aha (5) Baiga (26) Dabgar (47) Kharot (tJ) Baiswar (27) Dhangar (48) Kharwar (excluding BenbfUlsi) (1) Bajaniya (28) Dhanuk (49) Kol (8) Bajgi (29) Dharkar (50) Korwa (9) Ba.lahar (30) Dhpbi (51) Lalbegi (10) Ba.!miki (31) Dhusia or Jhusifl (52) Majhwar (II) Ba.ngaU (32) Dom (53) Nat (2) Banmanus (33) Domar (54) Pankha CD} Bansphor (34} Dusadh (55} Parahiya (14) Barwar (35) aharami (56) Pasi (15) Basor (36) Ghasiya (57) Patsri (16) Bawariya (37) GuaI (58) Rawat (7) Beldar (33) Habura (59) Saharya (18) Bedya (39) Hari (60) Sana.urhiya (19) Bhantu (40) Hela, (61) Sansiya (20) Bhoksa (41) Jatava (62) Shilpkar (21.) Bhuiya (42] Kalabaz (63) Turaiha (2) In Bunrlelkhand Division and the portion of Mirzapur District, south of Kai'l16ur Range- Gond FOREWORD THE Uttar Pradesh Government asked me in March, 1952, [0 supply them for the purposes of elections to local bodies population statistics with separation for scheduled castes (i) mohalla/ward -wise for urban areas, and (ii) vil1age~wise for rural areas. -
Baseline Report Writing
As seen from the graph above Govt. Agriculture Govt. Agriculture Livestock A majority of the youths (91%) in Kushinagar are unemployed; they are dependent on unskilled labor There are 1358 households in the old project area; District Maharajganj. In the project area: 100% of the Musahar Schemes 12 Schemes 6 1 jobs. The percentile was similar in Maharajganj when the project began. However, there have been youth Ÿ25% landless Musahar families have got Agriculture land allotted (181.98 acres) Livestock households have a broad 4 12% 2 6% 1% focused livelihood training programs during the past three years in Maharajganj making a considerable Ÿ 11 41% Musahar families benefited from Indira AwasYojana & Mahamaya AwasYojana “INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT 4% 2% number of youths engaged in skilled employment such as cycle repairing, radio & TV repairing, motor based livelihood strategy 11% Ÿ92 %Musahars families have job cards (MGNREGA) which includes agriculture, driving, mason jobs, plumber jobs, carpentry, etc., Moreover, 55 youths in Maharajganj have been Ÿ66% families linked with Public Distribution System (subsidized food and non-food items) of livestock rearing, physical Labor Labor supported with cycle rickshaws for employment on a gift chain basis, where they payback a certain 91 Ÿ28% families are getting cash benefits (€ 5/month) under Arthitk Graeeb Yojana labor and some income from 73 amount which is further used by the CBOs to support other Musahar youths. 73% 91% So far, 49% families have been supported by Government schemes in district Maharajganj. govt. schemes. Being landless Agriculture Agriculture Musahar CBOs level of advocacy, Group formation and member's knowledge MUSAHAR COMMUNITIES or having extremely marginal Livestock Livestock Advocacy Labor Maharajganj Labor Kushinagar The project has just been started in Kushinagar; hence the CBO formation & registration process is lands, the vast majority of the Govt. -
CUG No. / Email ID of JAIL OFFICIALS of up Sl.N Name of Institution Designation Mobile N0
CUG No. / Email ID OF JAIL OFFICIALS OF UP Sl.N Name Of Institution Designation Mobile N0. Other Email ID o. /Jail 1 Head Quarter,Lucknow Inspector General Of 9454418151 0522-2624454 [email protected] Prison 0522-2626524 FAX 2230252 2 Head Quarter,Lucknow Addl.I.G.(Admin) 9454418152 0522-2626789 0522-2616245 3 Head Quarter,Lucknow Addl.I.G.(Depart.) 9454418153 4 Head Quarter,Lucknow DIG (H.Q.) 9454418154 0522-2620734 [email protected] 5 Head Quarter,Lucknow Senior Supdt.(H.Q.) 9454418155 0522-2622390 [email protected] 6 Head Quarter,Lucknow Finance Controller 9454418156 0522-2270279 7 Head Quarter,Lucknow Executive Engineer 9454418157 0522-2273618 8 Head Quarter,Lucknow Sodh Adhikari 9454418158 0522-2273238 [email protected] 9 Head Quarter,Lucknow Asst. Engineer 9454418159 10 Head Quarter,Lucknow Camp Office of 9454418160 Inspector General Of Prison 11 Sampurna Nand Jail Addl.I.G.(Admin) 9454418161 0522-2452646 Training Center, Deputy Director 9454418162 [email protected] Lucknow Office 9454418163 [email protected] 12 Range Office, Agra DIG Prison 9454418164 0562-2605494 [email protected] Office 9454418165 13 Range Office, Meerut DIG Prison 9454418166 0121-2760129 [email protected] Office 9454418167 14 Range Office, Bareilly DIG Prison 9454418168 0581-2413416 [email protected] Office 9454418169 [email protected] 15 Range Office, Lucknow DIG Prison 9454418170 0522-2455798 [email protected] Office 9454418171 16 Range Office, Allahabad DIG Prison 9454418172 0532-2697471 [email protected] Office 9454418173 17 Range Office, DIG Prison 9454418174 0551-2344601 [email protected] Gorakhpur Office 9454418175 18 Agra, Central Jail Senior Supdt. -
COMMUNICATION TRADE ROUTES and HIGHWAYS at the Opening Of
COMMUNICATION TRADE ROUTES AND HIGHWAYS At the opening of the seventeenth century, there were no metalled roads in the district, though the main routes of land travel were clearly defined by avenues of trees and occasional rest-houses, known as serais. The travelers and merchants could pass the night in comfort and comparative security within their walled enclosures. These roads were of beaten earth and connected the district with the adjoining regions. However they were used only in the dry season. The whole district seems to have been traversed by a network of such roads. These roads connected the district with Basti, Faizabad, Azamgarh, Deoria and Ballia. Gorakhpur was a chief garrison town on the north of Ghaghra in the medieval period. Roads which were unmetalled connected it with Bihar and the adjoining areas. To know what transport would be like in the district of the seventeenth century or an earlier period, one may have to picture to oneself trains of ox- coaches (raths) and ox-carts (bahlis) with hammocks attached to the vehicles for carrying fodder for the animals, as well as small luggage, with a posse of horses ridden by middle class people and palanquins (palki) used by the elites or caravans of oxen, ponies and other pack animals laden with goods and flanked by foot-pilots. There were no bridges one the rivers which had to be crossed by means of ferry boats. The carts and wagons were fastened to boats by the wheel and the pole. The oxen and the horses swimming all the while, goods had to be unloaded before the pack-animals were driven into the rivers for negotiating their waters. -
UTTAR PRADESH Spatial Distribution of Wastelands 2015-16
UTTAR PRADESH UTTARAKHAND Wastelands Changes Saharanpur 2008-09 - 2015-16 Muzaffarngr Bijnor Baghpat Meerut NEPAL JyotibaPh Rampur Moradabad Ghaziabad Pilibhit Bareilly GBuddhaNgr Bulandshr HARYANA LakhimpurK Badaun Bahraich Shahjahanpur Aligarh Shravasti Etah Balrampur Sitapur Mathura Hathras Farrukhabad Hardoi SiddharthNgr Maharajganj Gonda RAJASTHAN Firozabad Mainpuri Kushinagar Kannauj Agra BaraBanki Lucknow Basti SantKabirNgr Gorakhpur Etawah Faizabad Auraiya Unnao Deoria AmbedNgr KanpurD Kanpur Sultanpur RaeBareli Mau Azamgarh Jalaun Ballia Pratapgarh Fatehpur Jaunpur Ghazipur Hamirpur Varanasi BIHAR Banda Kaushambi Jhansi SantRavi Chandauli Allahabad Mahoba Chitrakoot % Change to Mirzapur Total Geographical Area of a District Lalitpur MADHYA PRADESH -8.00 Sonbhadra 0.01 - 0.05 -7.99 - -3.00 0.06 - 0.10 -2.99 - -1.00 0.11 - 0.50 -0.99 - -0.50 0.51 - 1.00 -0.49 - -0.10 1.01 - 3.00 -0.09 - -0.05 0840 0 160 240 320 3.01 - 8.00 Km. -0.04 - 0.00 Salient Features · Decrease of net area under wastelands by 1082.29 sq. km. is observed in the state · 988.36 sq. km. of wastelands area is converted to cropland, contributed by land affected by salinity/alkalinity and land with openscrub; an area of 89.09sq. km. is converted to water body. · Wastelands area under Hardoi district has decrease by 79.25sq. km. and Kanpur Dehat by 72.19 sq. km . · Balliya district witnessed an increase in wastelands by 32.01 sq. km. and Maharajganj district by 1.83 sq. km. 213 PAGE PAGE 214 UTTAR PRADESH Spatial Distribution of Wastelands 2015-16 UTTARAKHAND Saharanpur Muzaffarnagar Bijnor NEPAL BaghpatMeerut Jyotiba Phule Nagar Legend Ghaziabad MoradabadRampur Gullied and/ or ravinous land (Medium) Gullied and/ or ravinous land (Deep) Bareilly Pilibhit G. -
1 Village Kathera, Block Akrabad, Sasni to Nanau Road , Tehsil Koil
Format for Advertisement in Website Notice for appointment of Regular / Rural Retail Outlet Dealerships Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) proposes to appoint Retail Outlet dealers in Uttar Pradesh, as per following details: Fixed Fee / Security Estimated monthly Type of Minimum Dimension (in M.)/Area of Mode of Minimum Bid Sl. No Name of location Revenue District Type of RO Category Finance to be arranged by the applicant Deposit (Rs. Sales Potential # Site* the site (in Sq. M.). * Selection amount (Rs. In In Lakhs) Lakhs) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9a 9b 10 11 12 SC, SC CC-1, SC PH ST, ST CC-1, ST PH OBC, OBC CC- CC / DC / Estimated fund Estimated working Draw of Regular / 1, OBC PH CFS required for MS+HSD in Kls Frontage Depth Area capital requirement Lots / Rural development of for operation of RO Bidding infrastructure at RO OPEN, OPEN CC- 1, OPEN CC- 2,OPEN-PH Village Kathera, Block Akrabad, Sasni to Nanau Road , Draw of 1 Tehsil Koil, Dist Aligarh ALIGARH RURAL 90 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Lots 0 2 Village Dhansia, Block Jewar, Tehsil Jewar,On Jewar to GAUTAM BUDH Draw of 2 Khurja Road, dist GB Nagar NAGAR RURAL 160 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Lots 0 2 Village Dewarpur Pargana & Distt. Auraiya Bidhuna Auraiya Draw of 3 Road Block BHAGYANAGAR AURAIYA RURAL 150 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Lots 0 2 Village Kudarkot on Kudarkot Ruruganj Road, Block Draw of 4 AIRWAKATRA AURAIYA RURAL 100 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Lots 0 2 Draw of 5 Village Behta Block Saurikh on Saurikh to Vishun Garh Road KANNAUJ RURAL 100 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Lots 0 2 Draw of 6 Village Nadau, -
Open Court CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Open Court CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD Allahabad, this the 23rd day of February, 2018 Present : Hon’ble Mr. Gokul Chandra Pati, Member-A Original Application No.330/00140/2018 Shiv Dhari, Master Craft Man (MCM) age- 79, S/o Late Abhilakh Yadav, Before retirement posted at District Gorakhpur, Permanent R/o Village Narhan Post Bharroh, Tehsil & Police Station Gola Bazar, Gorakhpur, District - Gorakhpur. .......Applicant. By Advocate –Shri Vijay Gautam Shri Atipriya Gautam Shri Ambarish Chatterji V E R S U S 1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Railways, Government of India, New Delhi. 2. The General Manager, North Eastern Railway (NER) Gorakhpur, District- Gorakhpur. 3. The Divisional Railway Manager (DRM), North Eastern Railway (NER) Gorakhpur, District - Gorakhpur. 4. The State Bank of India, through its Branch Manager, Branch, Barhalganj, Gorakhpur, District - Gorakhpur. ...... Respondents By Advocate : Shri Chanchal Kumar Rai Shri A.K. Sinha O R D E R Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the matter pertains to enhanced pension after 15 years on account of commutation as per rules. This was due to the applicant since 2011. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that his grievance may be redressed if a direction is given to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the applicant within a specified period of time. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection if such direction is given. 3. Accordingly, learned counsel for the applicant is directed to prefer a fresh representation before respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks by giving details of this case and on receipt of such representation, the respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation of the applicant as per rules by passing a reasoned and speaking order within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and communicate the decision to the applicant. -
HISTORY ANCIENT PERIOD in the Epic Period, the Region Covered By
HISTORY ANCIENT PERIOD In the epic period, the region covered by the present district of Gorakhpur, known as Karapatha, which formed part of the kingdom of Kosala, an important centre of Aryan culture and civilization. The renowned ascetic Gorakh Nath gave name and fame to this district by practicing austerities on the spot where the famous temple named after him stands. It appears that the earliest known monarch ruling over this region with his capital at Ayodhya, was Iksvaku, who founded the solar dynasty of Ksatriyas. It produced a number of illustrious kings till the accession of Ram, who was the greatest ruler of this dynasty. Ram had divided the kingdom, during his lifetime, into small principalities. He coronated his eldest son Kusa as the king of Kusavati present Kushinagar which lay in the Gorakhpur district till 1946. After Ram's renunciation of the world Kusa left Kusawati (Kushinagar) and repaired to Ayodhya. His cousin, Chandraketu, son of Lakshmana, even the epithet of malla (valiant) in the Ramayan, thereupon took possession of this region. The Mahabharata mentions that at the Rajasuya (imperial) sacrifice performed by Yudhisthira, a behest to conquer the east was given to Bhimasena who in turn subjugated the principality of Gopalak (identified with Gopalpur of Bansgaon tahsil). Close to Gopalpur at Bhimtola, Bhimasena is said to have reposed after his victory. The discovery of a series of enormous mounds at Gopalpur and around it suggests that the places has been old sites of extensive cities. A few development in the political history of the district during the post- Mahabharata period is the functioning of a number of republics under the sovereignty of the kingdom of Kosala. -
Impact of Climate on Sugarcane Yield Over Gorakhpur District, U.P. Using Statistical Model
Vayu Mandal 44(1), 2108 Impact of Climate on Sugarcane Yield over Gorakhpur District, U.P. using Statistical Model R. Bhatla1*, Babita Dani2 and A. Tripathi3 1Department of Geophysics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 2Department of Botany, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 3Amity Centre for Ocean-Atmospheric Science and Technology(ACOAST) Amity University, Jaipur, Rajasthan *DST-Mahamana Centre of Excellence in Climate Change Research, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The impact of climate on agriculture could result in problems with food security and may threaten the livelihood activities upon which much of the population depends. In the present study, the development of a statistical yield forecast model has been carried out for sugarcane production over Gorakhpur district using weather variables of crop growing season and past observed yield data for the period of 1971 to 2010. The study shows that this type of statistical yield forecast model could efficiently forecast yield 5 weeks and even 10 weeks in advance of the harvest for sugarcane within acceptable limit of error.The performance of the model in predicting yields at district level for sugarcane crop is found quite satisfactory for both validation (2007 and 2008) as well as forecasting (2009 and 2010). In addition to the above study, the climate variability of the area has also been studied and hence, the data series was tested for Mann Kendall Rank Statistical Test. The maximum and minimum temperatures were found to be significant with opposite trends (decreasing trend in maximum and increasing in minimum temperature) while other three are found insignificant with different trends (rainfall and evening time relative humidity with increasing trend andmorning time relative humidity with decreasing trend). -
Basic Information of Urban Local Bodies – Uttar Pradesh
BASIC INFORMATION OF URBAN LOCAL BODIES – UTTAR PRADESH As per 2006 As per 2001 Census Election Name of S. Growth Municipality/ Area No. of No. Class House- Total Rate Sex No. of Corporation (Sq. Male Female SC ST (SC+ ST) Women Rate Rate hold Population (1991- Ratio Wards km.) Density Membe rs 2001) Literacy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I Saharanpur Division 1 Saharanpur District 1 Saharanpur (NPP) I 25.75 76430 455754 241508 214246 39491 13 39504 21.55 176 99 887 72.31 55 20 2 Deoband (NPP) II 7.90 12174 81641 45511 36130 3515 - 3515 23.31 10334 794 65.20 25 10 3 Gangoh (NPP) II 6.00 7149 53913 29785 24128 3157 - 3157 30.86 8986 810 47.47 25 9 4 Nakur (NPP) III 17.98 3084 20715 10865 9850 2866 - 2866 36.44 1152 907 64.89 25 9 5 Sarsawan (NPP) IV 19.04 2772 16801 9016 7785 2854 26 2880 35.67 882 863 74.91 25 10 6 Rampur Maniharan (NP) III 1.52 3444 24844 13258 11586 5280 - 5280 17.28 16563 874 63.49 15 5 7 Ambehta (NP) IV 1.00 1739 13130 6920 6210 1377 - 1377 27.51 13130 897 51.11 12 4 8 Titron (NP) IV 0.98 1392 10501 5618 4883 2202 - 2202 30.53 10715 869 54.55 11 4 9 Nanauta (NP) IV 4.00 2503 16972 8970 8002 965 - 965 30.62 4243 892 60.68 13 5 10 Behat (NP) IV 1.56 2425 17162 9190 7972 1656 - 1656 17.80 11001 867 60.51 13 5 11 Chilkana Sultanpur (NP) IV 0.37 2380 16115 8615 7500 2237 - 2237 27.42 43554 871 51.74 13 5 86.1 115492 727548 389256 338292 65600 39 65639 23.38 8451 869 67.69 232 28 2 Muzaffarnagar District 12 Muzaffarnagar (NPP) I 12.05 50133 316729 167397 149332 22217 41 22258 27.19 2533 892 72.29 45 16 13 Shamli -
2018121170.Pdf
1 | P a g e DISTRICT SURVEY REPORT OF MINOR MINERALS GORAKHPUR DISTRICT PREPARED AS PER NOTIFICATION NO. S.O. 141 (E) NEW DELHI, 15TH JANUARY 2016 OF MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE BY CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY AND DIRECTORATE OF GEOLOGY & MINING MINERAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESH OCTOBER-2017 2 | P a g e The information provided in this report has been prepared from the existing and latest data collected from the concerned authorities. The data may vary due to flood, heavy rains and other natural calamities. Although utmost care has been taken during editing and printing, still there may be some minor corrections for which the Directorate of Geology & Mining cannot be held responsible. The suggestions, comments & queries of general public in this regard are most welcome by the concerned office. 3 | P a g e PREFACE The Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change (MoEFCC), Government of India, made Environmental Clearance (EC) for mining of minerals mandatory through its Notification of 27th January, 1994 under the provisions of Environment Protection Act, 1986. Keeping in view the experience gained in environmental clearance process over a period of one decade, the MoEFCC came out with Environmental Impact Notification, SO 1533 (E), dated 14th September 2006. It has been made mandatory to obtain environmental clearance for different kinds of development projects as listed in Schedule-1 of the Notification. Further, In pursuance to the order of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated the 27th February, 2012 in I.A. No.12- 13 of 2011 in Special Leave Petition (C) No.19628-19629 of 2009, in the matter of Deepak Kumar etc.