Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points

1a. Federal enactments and budget proposals often significantly impact State programs and fiscal resources. The Department of Law and Public Safety anticipates receiving $250.7 million in federal funds in FY 2020, which is a decrease of $8.06 million from the anticipated FY 2019 federal funding of $258.8 million. Federal funding allocated to the department seems to be remaining steady, with the exception of FY 2018 reflecting an increase in federal funds supporting disaster assistance received due to the impact of Superstorm Sandy and other storms. Actual expenditures of Federal funds totaled about $256 million in FY 2016, $248 million in FY 2017, and about $299 million FY 2018.

• Question: What are the principal reasons for the decline in Federal funds projected in FY 2020? Please evaluate any impacts that these changes may have on programs operated by the department. How have the clients served by these programs been affected? To what extent has the department’s monitoring, regulatory, and administrative activities, including those measured by performance metrics, been affected?

The net decrease in the projected FY2020 awards can be attributed to a trend in the types of programs funded, with new funding opportunities now focusing on research and evaluation. The Federal government is steering away from continuously funding programs that have existed for more than a decade, but are evaluating the success of existing programs and researching ways to address the same problems using new approaches. The Department of Law and Public Safety (Department) continues to apply for funding opportunities when programs correlate with Department programs and priorities. For instance, the Department applied for and will receive $90 million in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2018 funding from the Federal Office for Victims of Crime. These funds will support victim assistance programs, which provide victims with support and guidance in the aftermath of victimization. In addition, the Department is projecting to receive approximately $8 million in Emergency Management Performance Grant funds, which will enable the NJ Office of Emergency Management to prepare, respond to, and recover from emergency and disastrous incidents. There have been no changes in the Department’s monitoring, regulatory, or administrative activities due to the projected decrease in federal funds.

• Question: Are there any federal grants that the State did not receive in FY 2018 or FY 2019 due to a decrease or elimination of a federal grant program that negatively impacted the State?

1 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

There have been no decrease or elimination of federal grants that have negatively impacted the State.

1b. The FY 2020 budget reflects the anticipation and receipt of a variety of federal grants. The following is a compilation of a few of the grants intended to provide support services for victims of crime.

Federal Grants Supporting Victims of Crimes*

Name of Federal Grant Anticipated FY 2019 FY 2018 FY 2020 Division of State Victim Centered Law $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 Police Enforcement Training Sex Offender Notification $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 and Registration Act (All Unexpended) (SORNA) Division of Criminal Victim Assistance Grants $72.8 Million $90.7 $107.8 Million Justice (VAG) Million ($63 Million Unexpended) Violence Against Woman $3.890 $4 Million $3.9 Million Grant Million ($3.876 Million Unexpended) Victims of Crime Act $1 Million $500,000 $670,000 (VOCA) (All Unexpended) SORNA $225,000 $223,000 $300,000 (All Unexpended) Victims of Crime Victims of Crime Act – $344,000 $344,000 N/A Compensation Office Building State Technology Victim Compensation $2.9 Million $3.2 Million $10.5 Million Award ($3.401 Million Unexpended) *Data on federal grants was derived from the FY 2020 IBN 3110

• Question: Please provide documentation on how each of the above grants for victims has been disseminated Statewide. Please include the names of the recipient agencies (State, county, municipal, or nonprofit) and the amounts allocated through 2 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

each grant in FY 2015, FY 2016, FY 2017, FY 2018, and FY 2019. If a grant may be expended over a multi-year period, please provide that information. Please provide an understanding of why certain grants appear yet to be expended in FY 2018.

See Attachment A for list of grants for victims that have been disseminated Statewide.

The below information is based on actual awards for Federal Fiscal Year 2018, and anticipated award amounts for Federal Fiscal Years 19 and 20. This information is based on anticipated funding awards, and thus includes only budget authority, not actual award amounts. Federal Fiscal Year 2019 awards will be made in the Fall of 2019 (FY 2020). Expenditures of federal grant awards do not always correlate to the State’s fiscal year. Federal grants are awarded based on the Federal Fiscal Year (October 1 – September 30), and the timing for drawing down funds does not correlate to the State’s July 1 – June 30 fiscal year cycle.

Name of Federal Grant Anticipated Anticipated Actual Award FFY 2020 FFY 2019 FFY 2018 Division of State Victim Centered Law $750,000 $750,000 $0 Police Enforcement Training (Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies) Sex Offender Notification $400,000 $400,000 $224,612 and Registration Act (SORNA) Division of Criminal Victim Assistance Grants $40.3 million $58.9 million $90.7 million Justice (VAG) Victims of Crime Act (VOCA)Assistance Program Violence Against Woman $3.890 million $4 million $3.8 million Grant Victims of Crime Act $1 million $500,000 $999,832 (VOCA) Discretionary Training Program SORNA Reallocation from $225,000 $0 $0 JAG Victims of Crime Victims of Crime Act – $344,000 $344,000 $343,557 Compensation Building State Technology Office

Victim Compensation $2.9 million $3.2 million $3,376,000 Award

3 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

The U.S. Department of Justice issued many of the Federal Fiscal Year 2018 awards with special conditions prohibiting the obligation, expenditure, or draw down of funds until the USDOJ Office of Chief Financial Officer (OCFO) reviewed and approved the budget. These conditions are lifted through Grant Adjustment Notices on a rolling basis as the OCFO reviews and approves budgets. Several of those special conditions are still in place and the others have begun to be lifted starting in the winter of 2019.

2. A 2018 investigation by NJ Advance Media for NJ.com elaborated on the hardships that victims of crime and their families may experience when seeking help from the State Victims of Crime Compensation Office (VCCO). The report, Twice the Victim, highlighted the following concerns regarding the office and the process, arguing that the VCCO: 1) has decreased victim payouts over the past few years; 2) does not provide notification of the assistance when a person becomes a victim of crime; 3) denies certain expenses of the family if the victim had any responsibility in the crime; 4) has not increased the maximum amounts of financial claims in two decades; and 5) has not expended all the money it receives for victims’ aid.

The report indicated that in 2017, the office failed to distribute $3.4 million of available relief, and data obtained through public records requests found the State returned $382,833 in related federal funding earmarked for separate victims’ assistance grants. Further, the report determined that funds intended for a variety of support services across the State were never spent. In response to the 2018 article, the Attorney General acknowledged that the State needed to do more to service the victims of crime.

Research indicates that funds supporting New Jersey crime victims are provided through federal grants, VOCA grants, and State grants administered by the Department of Law and Safety through the New Jersey Victims of Crime Compensation Office (VCCO), State appropriated funds, and funds derived from court penalties, prisoner commissary revenues, restitution payments, and other revenue.

• Question: Please provide the Attorney General’s position on the role of the VCCO in assisting victims to file claims and distribute funds to victims. Please provide, by fiscal year, all federal, State, and other funds supporting victims of crime in FY 2015, FY 2016, FY 2017, FY 2018, and FY 2019. Please provide the budgeted amount for public awareness of the VCCO benefits in FY 2017, FY 2018, and FY 2019.

4 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

Please provide an overview of how the Attorney General’s office is working with local organizations to assist victims in the process of applying for benefits.

Attorney General Grewal is committed to making New Jersey a national leader in providing timely and compassionate services to victims of violent crime. As the report points out, the office lacked resources under the prior administration, and AG Grewal has made clear that more needs to be done to strengthen VCCO. In March 2019, AG Grewal welcomed victims advocate Elizabeth Ruebman to the Department. At AG Grewal’s request, Ms. Ruebman is conducting a review of New Jersey’s victim services and identifying ways to strengthen them. As part of this project, Ms. Ruebman will propose recommendations to improve existing services and, subject to the Attorney General’s approval, oversee the implementation of those recommendations.

Broadly speaking, the Department serves victims in seven ways:

1. Claim compensation. Compensating victims, as a payer of last resort, for expenses associated with the crime, through VCCO; 2. Support services. Helping victims obtain the counseling and support services they need; 3. Prosecution of perpetrators. Ensuring perpetrators are brought to justice, through the Division of Criminal Justice (DCJ) and the County Prosecutors’ Offices; 4. Bias investigation. Protecting the civil rights of victims, where there is evidence that the person was a victim of bias or discrimination, through DCJ and the Division on Civil Rights; 5. Victim witness services. Assisting victims should they be called to testify against their perpetrator, through DCJ’s State Office of Victim Witness Advocacy (SOVWA); 6. Policy development. Developing and implementing statewide policy reforms to improve services for victims; and 7. Grant funding. Facilitating grant funding for the state’s non-profit victim services organizations.

In this new role, Ms. Ruebman will be tasked with reviewing all seven aspects of the Department’s victim services.

The NJ Advanced Media report referenced that New Jersey returned $382,833 to the Federal government. The actual number was $328,814, out of the $12.4 million FY 14 VOCA Assistance award (less than 3%). Grant funding returned to the federal government was allocated to unexpended salary expenses by victim service providers. All counties that

5 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

received VOCA funding were awarded their requested amount of funding; no funds associated with victim services were returned to the federal government. VCCO increased overall claim payouts by nearly $800,000 from FY2017 to FY2018, and FY2019 payments are projected to exceed those from FY2018. Certain claim amounts related to medical payments have decreased, however, after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.

FY 2019 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY2018 FY 2019 YTD Projection State Funds $4,540,837 $6,349,148 $5,086,001 $4,371,248 $3,837,642 $4,700,000 Federal Funds $4,508,124 $1,366,131 $2,832,680 $4,322,832 $2,865,572 $4,500,000 Sex Crimes Victims Treatment Penalty Funds $144,419 $228,010 $84,674 $96,689 $74,398 $75,000 Total: $9,193,380 $7,943,289 $8,003,355 $8,790,769 $6,777,612 $9,275,000

During the current fiscal year, VCCO has processed over 5,304 claims. Of those, 2,881 were new claims, 272 were reopened claims where the claimant provided additional information, and the remaining claims related to supplemental assistance on existing claims.

VCCO’s role is to provide financial reimbursement to crime victims for out-of-pocket expenses resulting from their victimization. In carrying out this role, VCCO is mindful of the special needs of crime victims and their right to fairness, compassion, dignity, and respect when seeking VCCO benefits. VCCO’s staff currently consists of 31 dedicated full-time employees available to serve all New Jersey crime victims.

A victim seeking VCCO benefits may receive a maximum award of up to $25,000; this may be increased to $35,000 for catastrophic injuries. Under VCCO’s federal and State mandates, VCCO is the “payer of last resort” – meaning a claimant must exhaust all other reimbursement options available to him/her (e.g., insurance benefits, workers’ compensation benefits, charity care benefits, etc.) prior to making a claim with VCCO (N.J.S.A. 52:4B-12 and 19; N.J.A.C. 13:75-9.1). However, VCCO has authority to make emergency awards to a claimant if VCCO determines that the claimant is likely to be eligible for compensation, has no other means to receive emergency funds, and will suffer undue hardship if VCCO does not make such funds available (N.J.S.A. 52:4B-10.1). Funeral and relocation expenses are the most frequently requested VCCO emergency benefits sought by claimants.

6 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

VCCO is available to assist victims of crime to apply for benefits in-person in Newark or Trenton, online, by mail, fax, or over the phone. When a claimant requests emergency assistance, VCCO intake staff will contact the claimant directly by telephone to walk through the emergency filing process to expedite the claim. All claimants receive a PIN number once an application is complete so that they may access their claim in VCCO’s Case Processing System at any time. The system is available to check claim status, upload new documentation for consideration, and to send inquires to staff.

VCCO is also obligated to be a good steward of the federal and State dollars it uses to reimburse claimants. To do so, VCCO verifies each claim for reimbursement or emergency assistance through backup documentation demonstrating that a claimant is the victim of a compensable crime, that VCCO is the payer of last resort, and that the claimant has or will incur out of pocket expenses resulting from their victimization. Obtaining and verifying a claimant’s documentation establishing his/her victimization and losses is part of VCCO’s quality control to ensure that only eligible claimants receive awards.

By statute, VCCO has 180 days to process a claim (N.J.S.A. 52:4B-18). However, the sooner VCCO receives the necessary information on a claim, the sooner VCCO can process the claim for payment and provide a victim much need assistance.

VCCO is limited by statute in the amount and type of claims that may be paid out. But using its discretion through regulatory action, VCCO increased the caps on certain payments to victims, including counseling, relocation, transportation, and funeral expenses. These were the first increases since 2003.These actions increased the mental health benefit from $12,500 to $20,000, the funeral benefit from $5,000 to $7,500, the relocation benefit from $2,500 to $3,000, and the attorney fee benefit from $125 per hour to $200 per hour. These increases will assist victims of crime from across the State, but are expected to have a particular impact on the State’s urban areas.

There is no specific amount earmarked for public awareness, but it is a critical component of VCCO’s mission. VCCO partnered with SOVWA as part of a $557,500 public information campaign, of which VCCO contributed $187,500. VCCO has made community outreach and training a top priority to increase public awareness about VCCO’s compensation benefits. VCCO staff provided on-site training or attended community outreach events in several counties throughout the State. Through these effrts, VCCO conducts or attends approximately two training or public outreach events per month. Please see Attachment B chart for a list of outreach events that VCCO engaged in during 2018.

7 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

In addition, VCCO has a working relationship with every County Victim/Witness Advocacy Program within each Prosecutor’s Office in the State. Claims are often referred by the Victim Witness programs or submitted directly by their offices. But to strengthen connections with agencies that connect with victims, VCCO also initiated an awareness campaign to all municipal police departments, first responders, and major hospitals informing them about VCCO services and offering training about VCCO benefits. VCCO will be providing information cards that contain essential VCCO information for distribution to police departments and other first responders; these agencies can provide the VCCO cards to crime victims to promote awareness of VCCO services. Additionally, VCCO has provided information in hospital emergency rooms containing VCCO information, claims applications, and posters to increase awareness about VCCO benefits.

VCCO has implemented a number of initiatives to make filing a claim easier for victims and claim processing faster. VCCO staff work collaboratively with the Victim/Witness Advocacy Units in County Prosecutors’ Offices and the FBI. Many county victim/witness advocacy units use VCCO’s Case Processing System to assist victims with application filings; the remaining victim/witness units file claims with VCCO on behalf of victims by facsimile. Additionally, Domestic Violence Shelter advocates, Family Justice Center advocates, attorneys, and medical providers regularly forward benefit application submissions to VCCO for the victims serviced by those agencies or people.

In October 2018, VCCO established a bilingual unit to assist Spanish-speaking claimants with filling out VCCO applications and included a Spanish language application on its website for online filing. VCCO also secured a federal grant to update its electronic case tracking system. The new system will allow a claimant to up load required documents, check the status of their application in real time, and will provide a smart phone application (app) for claimants to access their VCCO file. VCCO anticipates that these improvements to its case processing system will help expedite claim processing and make it easier for claimants to file VCCO applications.

3a. Weekly, if not daily, news articles may be found regarding suspicious activity that may be threatening to schools or religious institutions Statewide. One article from the fall of 2018 indicated that according to the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness (NJOHSP), the number of reported school threats in New Jersey more than doubled during the 2017-2018 academic year.

8 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

In January of 2019, the Governor signed into law two bills to enhance the safety and security of New Jersey residents at schools, houses of worship, and community centers. Assembly Bill No. 4597 made a supplemental appropriation of $11,300,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Education to increase per pupil funding for nonpublic security aid from $75 to $150, and Assembly Bill No. 3906 made a revision to the New Jersey Nonprofit Security Grant Pilot Program to expand the type of protective measures that can be installed or constructed at houses of worship and community centers.

In March of 2018, Attorney General Directive 2016-7 was updated to expand the definition of suspicious activities to include “any and all threats of violence generally to any public location or mass gathering area” and “threats of violence specifically to any school, workplace, or house of worship, or other criminal activity related to terrorism”, better reflecting the current threat environment. Over the years, NJOHSP, in conjunction with the New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) has worked with local school districts on a variety of safety initiatives, including performing in-depth school security assessments for schools to locate security vulnerabilities and unannounced school security drill observations by the NJDOE. Additionally, it was indicated during the FY 2019 budget process that Division of State Police (DSP) “Field Operations Troopers” were to be assigned to stations throughout the State, had received additional training and certifications, and may be assigned to be school resource troopers for nine regional high schools.

• Question: Please provide the number of school threats reported in CY 2016, CY 2017, and CY 2018. How many of these threats in each year were determined credible? How many DSP field operations troopers have been trained and certified as school resource troopers? To which regional high schools were the troopers assigned? Please provide details on the benefits of these DSP assignments thus far. What is the Attorney General’s position on any new actions State and local governments can take to best protect students while in school? Does the department have adequate funding to support our school districts in maximizing school safety?

A Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) is an official document of observed behavior reasonably indicative of pre-operational planning related to terrorism or other criminal activity. SARs are stored in a law enforcement sensitive (LES) system accessible only to law enforcement personnel who have been trained in SAR thresholds and have a need-to know and a right-to- know. New Jersey’s SAR system is linked to the FBI’s unclassified system, eGuardian. SAR

9 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

information is shared throughout law enforcement agencies operating in New Jersey, including the NJ State Police, County Prosecutors’ Offices, and the FBI. The information sharing governance of SAR data is controlled by State and Federal laws and policies governing the collection, use, and dissemination of records.

SARs related to school threats increased from 2016 -- 2018 as SAR reporting has become more widespread. The large uptick from 2017 to 2018 is due in part to the NJ Attorney General’s revised directive that mandated immediate reporting of school threats, continued compliance by agencies in reporting SARs, and increased awareness by the general public of the need to report potential threats related to schools. SARs related to school threats reported from 2016 -2018:

-From 2016 to 2017: increase of 9.6% -From 2017 to 2018: increase of 308.3%

Each SAR is treated seriously and is not categorized as “credible” or “not credible.”

There are 20 DSP Field Operations Troopers that are trained and certified as School Resource Troopers. Below is a list of regional high schools in which the Troopers are assigned:

Bridgeton Station – Troop A

• Arthur P. Schalick High School • Cumberland Regional High School • Deerfield Township School • Elizabeth F. Moore School • Fairfield Township School • Hopewell Crest School • Morris Goodwin School • Norma School • Olivet School • Pittsgrove Township Middle School • Stow Creek Township School • Woodland Country Day School • Woodruff Middle School • Charles F. Seabrook School

Buena Vista Station – Troop A 10 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

• Buena Vista High School • Collings Lakes Middle School • Estelle Manor Elementary School • Folsom Elementary School • John C. Milanesi Elementary School • St. Augustine Prep • St. Mary’s Prep • Weymouth Twp. Elementary School • Buena Vista Middle School

Port Norris Station – Troop A

• Downe Twp. Elementary School • Fairton Christian School • Haileyville – Mauricetown Elementary School • Maurice River Twp. School • Myron Powell Elementary School • Port Norris Middle School • Salem County Special Services Cumberland County Campus

Woodbine Station – Troop A • Bishop McHugh Catholic Prep • Dennis Twp. Primary School • Dennis Twp. Elementary School • Upper Twp. Primary School • Upper Twp. Elementary School • Upper Twp. Middle School • Woodbine Elementary School

Woodstown Station – Troop A • Daretown School • Mannington Twp. Elementary School • Oldmans Twp. Elementary School • Quinton Twp. Elementary School • Ranch Hope Strang School • Salem County Vocational Technical School • Upper Pittsgrove Twp. Elementary

Sussex Station – Troop B 11 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

• High Point High School • Kittatinny Regional High School • Montague School • Sussex Christian School • Northwestern Christian School • Sandyston-Walpack School • Wantage School • Clifton Lawrence School, Wantage • Lakeland-Andover School, Lafayette • Lafayette School • Frankford School • Fredon School • Green Hills School • Tranquility Adventist • Sussex Middle School • McKeown School, Hampton Twp. • 3 Academy Lane, Green

Hope Station – Troop B • Allamuchy Township School • Frelinghuysen Township School • Hope Township School • Knowlton Township School • Ridge & Valley – Charter School

Perryville Station – Troop B • North Hunterdon High School • Ethel Hoppock Elementary School • Thomas B. Conley Elementary • Union Twp. Middle School • Union Twp. Elementary School • Lebanon Boro Elementary School • Bloomsbury School

Washington Station – Troop B

• Liberty Twp. School • White Twp. School 12 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

• Harmony School • Franklin Twp. School • Warren County Technical School • Hampton School

Bordentown Station – Troop C

• Hainesport Elementary School • New Hanover Twp. Elementary School

Hamilton Station – Troop C • Allentown High School • Farmingdale Elementary School • Millstone Elementary School • Millstone Middle School • Newell Primary School • NJ United Christian Academy • Roosevelt Elementary School • Stonebridge Middle School

Kingwood Station – Troop C • Delaware Valley Regional High School • East Amwell Elementary School • Kingwood Twp. Elementary School • Lester D. Wilson Elementary School • Milford Elementary School • Rocky Hill Elementary School • Stockton Elementary School • Alexandria Middle School

Red Lion Station - Troop C

• Seneca High School • Chatsworth Elementary School • Indian Mills Elementary School • Indian Mills Memorial School • Kenneth R. Olsen Middle School • Southampton Schools 1 • Southampton Schools 2 & 3 13 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

• Tabernacle Elementary School

Tuckerton Station – Troop C • Bass River Elementary School • Eagleswood Elementary School • Port Republic Elementary School

The responsibilities of the School Resource Troopers include:

• To assist the principals and counselors with providing guidance to students. • To assist school principals with potential criminal investigations involving students, parents, and/or faculty. • Act as a liaison in investigations involving students and parents which occur after school hours but could affect the daily activities of a student in the school environment. • Provide a visible presence and deterrence during the school day. • Attend classes in an informal manner to provide intimate contact with the police in a positive manner. • Conduct familiarization walkthroughs of the schools to Troopers assigned to Bordentown Station. • Assist school officials with conducting school safety drills including fire drills, lockdowns, shelter-in-place drills, and off-site evacuations. • Answer questions from faculty and staff regarding school safety drills. • Present driving laws and information to parents and driving age students. • Speak with students about the duties of law enforcement and what to do in order to become a law enforcement officer.

Initiatives like the School Safety Video Project and Active Shooter Training provide additional resources on school safety issues.

School Safety Video Project - DSP was awarded grant funds under the 2018 COPS STOP School Violence: School Violence Prevention Program (SVPP). These funds will be used to improve current video surveillance monitoring process used by the DSP of 66 schools within DSP patrol areas. This project seeks to introduce a technical solution to aggregate live camera feeds from school surveillance cameras into one centralized location and support digital analytics to help improve school safety partnerships with law enforcement. This will increase awareness of possible issues at the school and potentially decrease the amount of time it takes to activate emergency responders during critical events. This project will be a

14 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

collaborative effort between the Field Operations Section, Operations Support Unit, School Safety and Outreach Unit, and the School Resource Troopers assigned to the schools.

Active Shooter Training: The Attorney General created a working group with subject matter experts to create a statewide active shooter directive and training. This training is the first of its kind in the country to require all law enforcement officers to be trained when responding to any active shooter threat. Currently, there is no set uniform technique, which may become problematic when officers of different jurisdictions respond to an active shooter threat.

As a proactive measure, the Response to Active Shooter Training commenced July 2018. This course provided an introduction to active shooter response and the fundamentals of tactical room clearing while utilizing the principles of point of domination. The training consisted of two twelve-hour hour days for each session. The training was initially presented to 1,725 DSP members. In 2019, refresher trainings are currently scheduled and being conducted.

The Department works collaboratively with school districts, stakeholders, and partners to combine resources for the benefit of school safety initiatives.

3b. According to recent FBI data, New Jersey placed fourth on the list of states with the most bias incidents. According to the FBI data, New Jersey saw 495 bias crimes in 2017, the most recent year for which data is available. The FBI reported 282 in 2016 and 330 incidents in 2015. In contrast, the State reported 417 reported incidents of bias crime in FY 2016, an increase from FY 2015, when there were 367 reported incidents.

• Question: Please provide information regarding how bias crimes are reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Please include the number of law enforcement agencies Statewide who report to these crimes to the FBI. Please provide information regarding how bias crimes are reported to the Department of Law and Public Safety. Please include the number of law enforcement agencies that report these crimes to the Department of Law and Public Safety. Please explain why the total number of bias crimes contained in the 2016 Bias Incidents in New Jersey report released by the DSP is different from the total number of bias crimes contained in the 2016 FBI’s Hate Crime Statics for New Jersey report. Are there consequences harmful to the State of the FBI acknowledging fewer bias crimes than State sources report?

15 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

Upon the completion of each calendar year, the NJSP UCR Compliance unit compiles all bias incident data submitted by the UCR reporters from each contributing agency. This data is submitted to the FBI for inclusion in the Federal Annual Hate Crime Statistics Publication.

The number of law enforcement agencies Statewide who report to these crimes to the FBI:

Statewide - 536 agencies report and submit UCR statistics and bias incident reports. This includes:

• 468 municipal police departments; • New Jersey State Police who report for 77 municipalities without local police services; • 21 County prosecutor offices; • 21 sheriff’s departments; • 1 county police agency; and • 1 county park police department; • 14 college campus police departments; and • 9 other state agencies with law enforcement responsibilities.

When a bias incident occurs in New Jersey, the responding law enforcement agency investigates the incident according to the New Jersey Attorney General’s Guidelines on Bias Investigations. Attorney General Directive 1987-3 requires that each bias incident is recorded and submitted through the New Jersey Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program. As the state UCR program managers, the New Jersey State Police (NJSP) is responsible for the repository that collects all submitted UCR and bias data. NJ law enforcement agencies are required to submit all bias reports into the NJ UCR program Repository. Bias Incident Offense Reports can be completed and reported for any bias incident that occurs in any of the 565 municipalities in New Jersey.

Over the last year, the DSP UCR Unit and the NJ Division of Criminal Justice, Bias Crimes Unit transitioned to the DSP UCR Optimum Repository as the central database for all recorded bias incidents. The new system allows for each bias incident to be entered and submitted into the UCR repository and an email notification sent to advise of the particular facts surrounding the incident. This immediate email notification is sent to the DSP UCR Unit, the NJ Division of Criminal Justice Bias Crimes Unit, and the corresponding County Bias Liaisons based on where the incident occurred. Once a day, an email notification, with the accumulated daily statistics and pertinent data, will be broadcast to all 21 county prosecutor offices and the Office of

16 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

Homeland Security Preparedness advising each agency of all recorded bias incidents during the 24 hour timespan.

The number of law enforcement agencies Statewide who report to these crimes to the Department:

Statewide - 536 agencies report and submit UCR statistics and bias incident reports. This includes:

• 468 municipal police departments; • New Jersey State Police who report for 77 municipalities without local police services; • 21 County prosecutor offices; • 21 sheriff’s departments; • 1 county police agency; • 1 county park police department; • 14 college campus police departments; and • 9 other state agencies with law enforcement responsibilities.

The total recorded amount of bias incidents are different between the FBI Annual Hate Crime publication and the Bias Incident in New Jersey publication due to the manner in which each agency records these incidents. The Federal standard is to record each incident individually; the State standard is to record the number of victims for each incident. For example, in NJ, if a single bias incident targeted two victims, this would count as two incidents. The FBI considers this example as only one incident.

3c. The New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness (NJOHSP) administers a variety of federal and State preparedness grant programs. During the FY 2019 Assembly Budget Committee hearing, it was indicated that NJOHSP administers three non-profit security related programs: the federal Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP), the Security Enhancement Countering Unmitigated Risk in New Jersey (SECURE-NJ), and the New Jersey Nonprofit Security Grant Pilot Program (NJ NSGPP). Specifically, the FY2020 budget reflects an anticipation of $8.7 million in federal NSGP, more than double the grant from the prior year ($4.3 million) and $1 million for the State grant program.

• Question: Please provide a description of each of these non-profit grants, information on the number of applicants for each of these nonprofit grants, the amounts requested and the amount awarded per applicant. Please provide the 17 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

same information on any other similar federal, State, or private grants that serve nonprofits. With the funding provided through these grants over the past few years, has the demand for support been met or is additional funding recommended?

Federal Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP)

The federal NSGP provides funding to eligible nonprofit organizations, as described under section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, at the greatest risk of a terrorist attack. Eligible nonprofit organizations must utilize funding for the purchase and installation of security equipment on property owned or leased by the nonprofit organization. Equipment is limited to select items contained within categories 14 & 15 on FEMA's Authorized Equipment List; they include items such as CCTV, card access readers, blast film, lighting, fencing, bollards, etc. Applicants may pursue expenses for management and administration (no more than 5% of the award), training, exercise and planning activities. This federal program consists of two (2) grant funding opportunities based upon the applicant’s geographic location as described below:

NSGP-UA: This program is limited to nonprofit organizations located within designated areas of New Jersey (Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Middlesex, Morris, Monmouth, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties). The maximum amount per applicant is currently $100,000.

NSGP-S: This program is limited to nonprofit organizations located within designated areas of New Jersey (Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Gloucester, Mercer, Salem and Warren Counties). The maximum amount per applicant is not yet determined.

Security Enhancement Countering Unmitigated Risk in New Jersey (SECUR-NJ)

The SECUR-NJ is a state-aid grant program limited to “target hardening” activities, such as the purchase and installation of physical security equipment. Eligible applicants were registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations determined to be at a high risk of terrorist attack within the following 9 counties are eligible to apply for this competitive funding: Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Gloucester, Mercer, Salem, and Warren counties. This grant is expected to be closed in July 2019.

18 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

New Jersey Nonprofit Security Grant Pilot Program (NJ NSGPP)

The NJ NSGPP - Security Personnel (NSGPP - SP) is limited to the hiring of federal, state, county, or municipal active law enforcement officers appointed pursuant to P.L.1985, or security officers registered pursuant to P.L.2004, c.134 for the applicant’s facility. Under special conditions, the use of security personnel may be used for off-site events within the geographic boundaries of the State of New Jersey. The maximum amount per applicant is $10,000. The NJ NSGPP - Target Hardening Equipment (NJ NSGPP-THE) is limited to the purchase and installation of security equipment on property owned or leased by the nonprofit organization. Equipment is limited to select items contained within categories 14 & 15 on FEMA's Authorized Equipment List; they include items such as CCTV, card access readers, blast film, lighting, fencing, and bollards. The only exceptions are Alert/PA systems for emergency broadcasting. The maximum amount per applicant is $50,000. Note: Eligible nonprofit organizations may apply annually for both the NJ NSGPP - SP and NJ NSGPP - THE programs. However, each nonprofit organization may only be awarded funding for one state program per fiscal year. Additionally, the NJOHSP shall assign a preference for eligible applicants which have not received either a federal or state security grant in the last two grant cycles.

Total Amt Total Amt Applicants Requested Awarded NSGP 160 $19,473,735.00 $8,684,930.00 SECUR-NJ 66 $2,677,680.00 $1,000,000.00 NJ NSGPP 126 $1,249,852.00 $1,000,000.00 Other similar grants? No

4. The Department of Law and Public Safety annually outsources cases and assignments, retaining outside counsel for various reasons. The department also enters into client service agreements with other State departments to handle legal cases through outside counsel. During the FY 2019 legislative budget review process, the department provided documentation that State agencies paid approximately $26.7 million to outside counsel in calendar year 2017.

• Question: Please provide a list of cases and assignments for which outside counsel was retained, including the amount paid per case for calendar years 2018 and 2019 to date. What percentage of outside counsel costs represents legal fees paid on a contingency basis? Which specific cases involve outside counsel retained pursuant to a contingency fee arrangement? 19 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

The Department of Law and Public Safety annually outsources cases and assignments, retaining outside counsel for various reasons. The Department also enters into client service agreements with other State Departments to handle legal cases through outside counsel. During the FY 2020 legislative budget review process, the Department provided documentation that State agencies paid approximately $22.2 million to outside counsel in calendar year 2018.

Outside Counsel Approved Costs 2018 (Attachment C) Outside Counsel Approved Costs 2019 (Attachment D)

With regard to contingency fee matters in 2018, the State resolved one matter wherein counsel was representing the State on a contingency fee basis. That matter was NJDEP v. Atlantic Richfield, et al., pertaining to defendant Shell Oil. The total settlement in that matter was $68.5 million. From that amount, outside counsel (Miller & Axline, P.C.; Cohn Lifland Pearlman, Herrmann & Knopf, LLP; Law Office of John K. Dema, PC.; and Berger Montague, PC;) was paid $12.8 million.

Pending Contingency Fee Matters (Attachment E)

5a. On June 13, 2018, the Governor signed a package of firearm bills. The Governor’s office indicated that more than 2,000 shootings occur annually in New Jersey, with around 500 firearm-related deaths each year. The Governor opined that firearm-related violence costs the state’s economy approximately $1.2 billion annually and directly costs taxpayers nearly $275 million. The Governor’s Budget in Brief (page 27) indicates the budget will propose raising fees for obtaining a firearms purchaser identification card and permit to purchase a handgun, which have been the same since 1966, and implement excise taxes on fire arms and ammunition.

• Question: Please provide an overview of all the firearms fees which will be increased, including the current fee and the fee proposed to be implemented. Please provide the amount of revenue anticipated from each fee. What impact on public safety in general and firearms-related crimes in particular can be expected to result from the proposal to increase fees and taxes on firearms and ammunition?

New Jersey has some of the country’s strongest laws to keep firearms away from dangerous individuals and to ensure responsible gun ownership. Although the state has updated its gun

20 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

laws at various times in recent years to address new threats, firearms fees have not been increased since 1966.

New Projected State Police – Proposed Firearm Fee Increases Current Fee Proposed Additional Fee Revenue Application - Firearms Purchaser Identification Card $5.00 $100.00 $156,000 Application - Permit to Purchase $2.00 $50.00 $90,000 Application - Duplicate Firearms Purchaser ID Card $0.00 $50.00 $49,000 Application - Wholesale/Retail Dealer Employee Licenses $5.00 $40.00 $31,000 Initial Application - Retail Firearms Dealer License $50.00 $500.00 $12,500 Renewal Application - Retail Firearms Dealer License $50.00 $500.00 $48,500 Initial Application - Retail Firearms Dealer License for Corporations or Partnerships $50.00 $500.00 $0 (see note) Renewal Application - Retail Firearms Dealer License for Corporations or Partnerships $50.00 $500.00 $0 Initial Application - Manufacturer/Wholesale Dealers of Firearms $7,500 $150.00 $1,500.00 Renewal Application - Manufacturer/Wholesale Dealers of Firearms $6,000 $150.00 $1,500.00 Initial Application -Manufacturers/Wholesalers for Corporations or Partnerships $150.00 $1,500.00 $0 (See note) Renewal Application - Manufacturers/Wholesalers for Corporations or Partnerships $150.00 $1,500.00 $0 (see note) Application/Renewal - Permit to Carry $20.00 $400.00 $152,000 NICS Check for Firearms Purchase $15.00 $45.00 $5,085,000

Note: Current and proposed fees are the same for Retail Firearms Dealers and for Corporations or Partnerships.

NICS checks are expected to increase due to the new legislation that requires NICS checks to be completed on all private firearms sales.

5b. P.L. 2018, c. 34, enacted June of 2018, requires law enforcement, upon court order, to seize firearms from persons determined by certain licensed health care professionals 21 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

(psychology, psychiatry, medicine, nursing, clinical social work, or marriage and family therapy) to be likely to engage in conduct that poses a threat of serious harm to themselves or another person.

• Question: How many firearms have been seized as a result of this law? What is the cost to the Division of State Police to comply with this law, including specifically the cost of storing these firearms and magazines? Have any firearm purchaser identification cards or permits to purchase a handgun been voided and returned to the Superintendent of State Police as a result of this amended law? If so, how many?

Since enactment of this law, the Firearms Investigation Unit (FIU) has not received any seized firearms, firearms purchaser identification cards, or permits. FIU has no knowledge that any State Police Stations have received firearms, firearms purchaser identification cards, or permits as a result of this law. However, it is possible local police departments have seized firearms, firearms purchaser identification cards, or permits as a result of this law.

Local police departments are not required to report seized items to FIU. As far as cost to the NJSP (FIU specifically), the cost would involve updating the Firearms Licensing System upon notification of a seized firearms purchaser identification card, permit, or firearm.

5c. P.L. 2018, c. 35, enacted in 2018, known as the Extreme Risk Protective Order Act of 2018, authorizes New Jersey courts to issue gun violence protective orders against individuals who pose a significant risk of personal injury to themselves or others by possessing or owning a firearm. The protective orders prohibit the person who the order is filed against from securing or possessing any permit or license allowing firearm possession during the protective-order period. It is a fourth-degree crime for a person to purposely or knowingly violate any provision of an extreme risk protective order.

• Question: How many firearms have been ordered to be surrendered as a result of this law? What amount of expenditures have the Division of State Police (DSP) or local law enforcement agencies incurred to store or destroy after one year those firearms or ammunition surrendered by individuals against whom temporary extreme risk protective orders or extreme risk protective orders are issued? How many convictions have resulted from this enacted law?

The Enhanced Duty to Warn Law took effect on June 13, 2018 and requires practitioners to advise law enforcement when a duty to warn is triggered so that the police can check to see

22 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

if the patient has firearms. If so, the police and prosecutor must consider whether to file a motion to revoke firearms permits. If a judge revokes the permit(s) and a patient fails or refuses to turn over firearms, the court may then issue an order to search for and seize the firearms. The Extreme Risk Protection Order Act, although signed into law on June 13, 2018, does not take effect until September 1, 2019. As such, no extreme risk protection orders have been issued and no firearms have yet been seized as a result of this law.

5d. P.L.2018, c. 36 requires all private firearm sales or other private transactions to be conducted through a State licensed retail dealer. Licensed retail dealers are required to conduct a National Instant Criminal Background Check (NICS) of the person acquiring the firearm before the transaction occurs.

• Question: As the point of contact for conducting NICS checks, does the Division of State Police differentiate between background checks for private sales of firearms and retail sale of firearms? How many background checks have been conducted as a direct result of this law? Has there been an increase in the number of NICS checks conducted as a result of this law? Are there additional costs associated with conducting NICS checks for private firearm sales?

The Division of State Police does differentiate between background checks for private sales of firearms and retail sale of firearms.

Since the law became effective in October 2018, the NJSP National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Unit has compiled the following statistics specific to private sale background checks:

1. October 2018: 60 2. November 2018: 130 3. December 2018: 137 4. January 2019: 131 5. February 2019: 115

Total increase to date: 573

There has been an average increase of approximately 114 additional requests per month in the past five (5) months of data captured. There are no additional costs associated with conducting NICS checks for private firearm sales.

23 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

5e. P.L. 2018, c. 37, enacted in June 2018, amended the requirements necessary to show a justifiable need to carry a hand gun in public. This law changes the serious threat threshold established by the previous administration by expressly defining justifiable need to require a showing of specific threats or previous attacks that demonstrate a special danger to the applicant’s life and that cannot be avoided other than by issuance of a permit to carry a handgun. The bill’s requirement to show specific threats tightens the qualifications for firearm carrying.

• Question: Following the enactment of P.L. 2018, c. 37, has there been a reduction in the number of permits to carry a hand gun issued in this State? Has there been a reduction in the number of applications for permits to carry a handgun? How many applications for permits to carry a hand gun have been denied by the State Police as a result of the revised serious threat threshold? How many applications for permits to carry a hand gun have been denied by the county or municipal law enforcement as a result of the revised serious threat threshold?

The FIU has not denied any permit to carry application based on the revised serious threat threshold since the enactment of P.L. 2018, c.37. The majority of permit to carry applications that FIU receives are from armed guard or armored car employees and none of those applications were denied based on the serious threat threshold since June 2018. Note that some applications have been denied for reasons other than justifiable need. FIU receives very few applications for permits to carry from individuals other than armed guard or armored car employees, and FIU has received none since June 13, 2018. The FIU does not maintain complete information on the number of applications for permits to carry that have been denied by county or municipal law enforcement agencies based on P.L. 2018, c.37.

Listed below is a breakdown of the permit to carry applications received by FIU in 2017, 2018, and to-date 2019:

24 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

APPLICATIONS PROCESSED JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD 2017 FIU PTC- APPRD 45 16 44 54 38 27 27 19 20 20 32 17 359 HANDGUNS DENIED 0 0 0 1 9 0 1 0 3 1 0 2 17 TOTAL 45 16 44 55 47 27 28 19 23 21 32 19 376

APPLICATIONS PROCESSED JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD 2018 FIU PTC- APPRD 22 23 13 20 33 35 48 43 20 24 6 31 318 HANDGUNS DENIED 0 1 1 1 0 2 2 2 9 1 0 1 20 TOTAL 22 24 14 21 33 37 50 45 29 25 6 32 338

APPLICATIONS PROCESSED JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD 2019 FIU PTC- APPRD 17 15 43 75 HANDGUNS DENIED 0 2 1 3 TOTAL 17 17 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78

5f. P.L. 2018, c.38 adopted the federal definition of armor piercing ammunition and clarified that possession or manufacture of this ammunition is a crime of the fourth degree.

• Question: How many charges and convictions have there been due to the enactment of this law?

Number of people charged under 2C:39-3f from 06/13/2018 to 03/22/2019: 7 Number of people convicted under 2C:39-3f from 06/13/2018 to 03/22/2019: 2

5g. The enactment of P.L. 2018, c. 39, which went into effect June 2018, banned firearm magazines or firearms with fixed ammunition magazines that held more than ten rounds of ammunition. Prior to the enactment, only magazines capable of holding 15 or more rounds 25 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

of ammunition were illegal in New Jersey. P.L. 2018, c. 39 allowed a person who, prior the law’s effective date, owned prohibited firearm magazines or firearms with fixed ammunition magazines that were incapable of being modified to retain possession of the magazine or firearm and register them within one year with a law enforcement agency. A person also had the option to: 1) render the firearm or magazine inoperable; 2) permanently modify the firearm or magazine to accept 10 rounds or less; or 3) surrender the firearm or magazine to law enforcement. It is a fourth-degree crime for a person to knowingly possess a large capacity ammunition magazine unless the magazine is registered as required.

• Question: How many firearms or magazines were registered following the enactment of this law? What is the cost to the Division of State Police for registering these firearms and magazines? How many persons have been charged or convicted with possessing a large capacity ammunition magazine following the enactment of this law? Has there been an increase in the number of charges and convictions for possessing a large capacity ammunition magazine following the enactment of this law?

Firearms Investigation Unit (FIU) has no knowledge of any firearms or magazines registered as a result of the enactment of this law.

The cost to the Division of State Police for registering firearms and magazines (when it occurs) would only be the cost of an FIU employee updating the Firearms Licensing System upon notification.

How many persons have been charged or convicted with possessing a large capacity ammunition magazine following the enactment of this law? Has there been an increase in the number of charges and convictions for possessing a large capacity ammunition magazine following the enactment of this law?

Number of people charged under 2C:39-3j from 06/13/2018 to 03/22/2019: 363 Number of people convicted under 2C:39-3j from 06/13/2018 to 03/22/2019: 18

Since 2C:39-3j is the same statute utilized for violations of the previous magazine capacity limitation (15 rounds), FIU is unable to determine if there has been an increase in the number of charges and convictions for possessing a large capacity ammunition magazine (10 rounds) following enactment of this law.

26 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

6a. P.L. 2018, c. 101, enacted in August 2018, authorized the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), in the Department of Law and Public Safety to issue additional alcoholic beverage licenses in a project area within Fort Monmouth, specifically, in the three municipalities located at the former Fort Monmouth property: the boroughs of Eatontown, Oceanport, and Tinton Falls. The special licenses permit the license holder to sell alcoholic beverages for consumption on the licensed premises. The law stipulates that one special license will be provided for every 100 acres of the project area and 12 special licenses will be issued for a project area over 1,000 acres.

• Question: Please provide a list of alcoholic beverage licenses issued by the ABC in each of the three municipalities, by municipality. Please provide any ABC fees associated with the issuance of the license. If known, please provide the cost per license.

No special alcoholic beverage licenses have been issued by the three host municipalities, Eatontown, Oceanport and Tinton Falls, in the Fort Monmouth project area. The issuing Authority for these licenses is the municipality and not the ABC. Generally, the cost of the license is as determined at auction. The ABC has not received applications or fees associated with issuance of the license. The State fee is $200.

6b. On September 21, 2018, the Director of ABC issued a special ruling which authorized certain activities by limited brewery license holders, clarifying the privileges that limited brewery licensees have pursuant to N.J.S.A. 33:1-10, to balance the concerns and interests of the entire industry, and ensure compliance with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act and regulations. On October 2, ABC announced that it was suspending the special ruling to provide ABC with the opportunity to engage in further conversations with stakeholders, including craft breweries and other alcoholic beverage license holders, about the impact of the special ruling.

• Question: Please provide the status of the conversations with stakeholders. Does the division plan to re-issue the special ruling regulating limited brewery license holders? If so, what are the anticipated costs associated with enforcing the special ruling?

Over the past several months, the Division has been seeking input from stakeholders on this issue. The Acting Director has met with representatives of the New Jersey Brewers Association, the New Jersey Beer Guild, the Licensed Beverage Association, the New Jersey

27 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

Restaurant Association, and others. ABC is exploring the reissuance of a Special Ruling that defines the privileges of the holders of Limited Brewery licenses.

6c. P.L. 2018, c. 147, enacted in December 2018, authorizes the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control to issue to up to 14 one-day permits per calendar year to seasonal plenary retail consumption licensees, which have a fee of $500 per permit.

It has been noted that Monmouth County is the only county in the State that is home to establishments in which operate under a seasonal retail consumption license, which allows them to be open from May 1 through November 14.

• Question: To date, how many establishments with seasonal retail consumption licenses have applied for and received the one day permits?

Only two seasonal retail consumption licensees have applied for and received the one-day permit. Both of these licensees applied for multiple days: one for three days and the other for five days.

6d. Prior to November of 2018, a person who owned or operated a restaurant, dining room, or other public place where food or liquid refreshments are sold or served to the general public and who does not have a license authorizing on-premises consumption may allow patrons to bring onto the premises and consume wine or beer in any portion of the premises open to the public (known as “BYOB”). However, the law provided that the restaurant could not advertise inside or outside of the premises that patrons may bring and consume their own wine or malt alcoholic beverages. As of 2018, a federal judge declared unconstitutional on the grounds of free speech the provisions of N.J.S.A 2C:33-27, which prohibited a restaurant from advertising as a BYOB.

• Question: What was the number of annual violations of N.J.S.A 2C:33-27 for 2016, 2017 and 2018 prior to this ruling?

No establishments have been charged under this statute in 2016, 2017, or 2018, by the Alcoholic and Beverage Control ABC Unit. It is possible that municipal authorities have issued charges under this statute. DCJ does not track municipal charges of this nature.

7. The growth in the popularity of craft beer, wines, and distilled spirits reflects the public’s continued thirst for local, unique beverages, and New Jerseyans have responded by

28 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

establishing and supporting limited breweries, plenary and farm wineries, cideries, meaderies, and craft distilleries.

In order to brew or manufacturer these craft beverages commercially, a person must have a manufacturer’s license pursuant to R.S.33:1-10. The enactment of P.L.2012, c.47 revised the law governing brewery licenses, resulting in a proliferation of limited brewery (craft brewery) license applicants and increased production of beer.

During the FY2019 budget process, the department indicated that 100 percent of applications for limited breweries, plenary and farm wineries, cideries and meaderies, and craft distilleries required contact with the applicant to amend, add, or elaborate on information and that the ABC was attempting to find ways to streamline the process.

• Question: Please explain the current application process for limited breweries, plenary and farm wineries, cideries and meaderies, and craft distilleries. For each type of license, how many applications for limited breweries, plenary and farm wineries, cideries and meaderies, and craft distilleries were received in FY 2017, FY 2018, and FY 2019, to date, and how many were approved, rejected, or are pending? What is the average time frame for issuance of a license from the initial application for limited breweries, plenary and farm wineries, and craft distilleries, respectively? What are ABC’s current procedures regarding deficient applications? Has the ABC taken any steps to streamline the licensing process, and if so, to what effect?

All applications for Class A licenses, pursuant to 33:1-10, are manufacturing licenses. These applications are virtually the same with some variations for nature of the applicant’s business structure. The application process begins with the ABC on-line licensing system where the applicant provides the pertinent information regarding their business and their method of operation. They are required to supply documentation to support the application and demonstrate a valid source of funds. This also includes proof of publication, proof of TTB approval (Federal Permit), and proof of state tax bond. Applicants must be fingerprinted. When all required information is provided to the Division, the application is deemed complete. At that time the application will be reviewed and a background investigation conducted. As a courtesy to the governing officials, ABC also notifies the municipality where the proposed licensed premises will be located. A site inspection is conducted prior to issuance of license. If statutory requirements are met, the Division may issue a Temporary Permit to allow the applicant to begin operations as an interim accommodation.

29 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

FY FY FY 2017 2018 2019 (est. only) Total Received & Still Pending Limited Brewery 7 18 11 36 Plenary Winery 2 3 2 7 Farm Winery 1 0 0 (3/22/2019) 1 Cider & Meadery 0 4 0 (3/22/2019) 4 Craft Distillery 6 2 5 13 Approved Limited Brewery 18 8 14 (3/22/2019) Plenary Winery 3 1 0 (3/22/2019) Farm Winery 1 0 0 (3/22/2019) Cider & Meadery 0 0 0 (3/22/2019) Craft Distillery 7 7 2 (3/22/2019) Rejected Limited Brewery 0 0 0 Plenary Winery 0 0 0 Farm Winery 0 0 0 Cider & Meadery 0 0 0 Craft Distillery 0 0 0

The numbers in the above chart represent only five of the Division’s 30 different types of state issued licenses.

The issuance of a license from the initial application filing varies. No meaningful review can take place until the application is complete so permits may be delayed depending on the completeness of the application and the length of time the applicant takes to provide requested documents and information. Other variables include the volume of all types of state issued license applications received and the availability of ABC personnel and resources.

Every application requires contact with the applicant either by telephone, letter, or email to amend, add, or elaborate on received information. ABC provides templates and samples of required documentation. ABC personnel communicate with applicants throughout the process and offer assistance as appropriate.

30 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

8a. The Division of State Police (DSP) has many duties and missions to fulfill: forensic services, air ambulance, marine and highway safety, homeland security, and general police protection services, to name only a few.

The Division of State Police is currently recruiting to ensure adequate staffing to fulfill these missions. The FY 2020 Budget in Brief indicates that FY 2020 will commence with 2,757 troopers and end with 2,762 troopers (page 26). It further notes that the budget increases appropriations by $6.5 million in order to facilitate the 160th and 161st recruit classes.

During the FY 2019 budget process, the department indicated the 159th class would commence January 2019 with 200 recruits and graduate June 2019 with an estimated 130 recruits. It appears 159th class commenced January 28, 2019 with 164 recruits, lower than anticipated. The department also indicated that the 160th recruit class would commence in January of 2020, and the 161st class would enter the academy in January of 2021.

A DSP media release stated that the 158th State Police Recruit Class commenced on January 29, 2018 with more than 200 recruits. The class was expected to graduate with an estimated 130 recruits; however, it exceeded expectations and graduated 161 recruits, 147 men and 14 women. Of this graduating class, 77 percent had a Bachelor's degree or higher, 18 percent are prior military, and 15 percent have prior law enforcement experience.

The department’s responses to the OLS 2019 discussion point questions indicated that there were 68 troopers eligible to retire by the end of FY 2018 and zero eligible in FY 2019. Although these troopers are eligible to retire, they may delay their retirement date past the year of eligibility.

• Question: Please provide an update on the 158th and 159th recruit classes. How many persons applied for each recruit class? Were there sufficient applicants to fill the 159th recruit class? How many qualified applicants resigned their commission due to the lapse in time between applying and the class commencing? What is the projected graduation date for the 159th recruit class? What are the planned commencement and graduation dates for the 160th and 161st recruit classes? What is the enrollment target for each class? When will the DSP recruit selection process begin for the 160th recruit class? What were the minority and gender percentages of the two most recent classes – the 158th and 159th? Is the department satisfied that it is improving the diversity of recruit class enrollees without reducing the

31 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

aptitude of the recruits? How has each of these DSP recruit classes contributed to the minority membership of the DSP?

The initial number of applications received was 8,020 (both qualified and disqualified applicants) to support 3 possible classes: 158th, 159th, and 160th. Once sorted, the number of Background Investigation Questionnaires (BIQ) are as follows:

Sent out: 158th Class – 709 159th Class – 676 160th Class -- 545 Returned: 158th Class – 603 159th Class – 498 160th Class -- 197

There were sufficient applicants to fill the 159th class, however, the 159th class was slightly below the maximum Academy capacity and had 164 recruits start on day one due to applicants leaving the process. The 160th class will have to be supplemented from the opening of a new Selection Process, as there was not a sufficient amounts of applicants left to support the third class in the current selection process pool (158th Selection process).

Between the 158th and 159th classes, the amount of Background Information Questionnaires sent out but not returned equaled 284. It should be noted that out of both processes, 371 withdrawals were received, part of which may or may not include the non-returned BIQs. The State Police does not maintain statistics on the reasons qualified applicants withdraw, resign, or fail to respond to invitations to participate during the time application and commencement of any particular class.

The 159th class is scheduled to graduate on July 12, 2019.

The 160th class has a start date of February 24, 2020 and will graduate August 7, 2020. The projected, not solidified, date for the 161st class is August 2020 and would graduate February 2021.

The enrollment target for each class is 200 recruits.

DSP has a current pool of applicants from our current Selection Process for the 160th State Police Class. The Next Selection Process will be opening April 29th to May 12th 2019 and NJSP will utilize applicants from this process to supplement the 160th State Police class which will start a class of 200 on 2/24/20.

32 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

The minority percentage at the start of the Class:

158th Class = 42% 159th Class = 31%

The gender percentage of:

158th Class = 90% male 10% female 159th Class = 94% male 6% female

DSP has continuously worked to improve the diversity of each selection process. As this effort is ongoing, the goal to increase and accurately reflect the State demographics in all recruiting cycles has improved in certain minorities. While NJSP has met with some success in these target areas, NJSP strives for a consistent representation in all minority groups as compared to the make-up of the State of New Jersey.

• Question: Please provide a detailed budget for the 160th and 161st recruit class, respectively, divided between costs to be incurred in each of FY 2020, FY 2021 and FY 2022. Please also itemize any costs of the 159th class that fall into FY 2020. When was the recruit training regimen last updated? After the six-month period from commencement to graduation, what amount of training, in what subject area, is provided exclusively to newly sworn troopers in their first and second year of service?

FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 160th Class $4,000,000 $0 $0 161st Class $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $0

Expenses for the 159th class that will incur in FY 2020 will include one pay period of recruit stipends paid prior to graduation.

The Training Bureau updates and approves all lesson plans in accordance with NJSP policies. All updates are conducted in order to stay current with basic police practices and protocols, as well as the most recent case law, following our 7-Step Training Cycle. The Training Bureau’s “recruit training regimen” is updated consistently and as much as needed, with the commencement of every new DSP Recruit Class, most recently just prior to the 159th State Police Class, which began on January 28, 2019. 33 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

Newly sworn members receive a total of 480 hours of training with an assigned trooper coach upon reporting to their first road station assignment. The subject area/training encompasses general road duty trooper roles and responsibilities.

Two other courses are conducted specifically for troopers with 1-5 years experience: Effective Patrol Tactics and Principles of Policing.

• Question: Please provide a breakdown of DSP staffing allocations, by division and unit, and also indicate the number of civilian staff in each division or unit. Please provide an update on the number of troopers eligible for retirement in the next 10 years, per year. For the period between 2016 and 2020, please indicate, by year, the number of troopers who were eligible to retire, the number who actually retired, and the length of time that elapsed between retirement eligibility and actual retirement for each retiree. How do past and future retirements affect the minority ratios? Please provide a statistical overview by gender and ethnicity within the DSP as of the close of FY 2018. Please provide a gender and minority breakdown, by rank, for the DSP.

34 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

35 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

DSP 10 year retirement eligibility

Eligible to Fiscal Year retire Notes FY 2019 0 ** FY 2020 159 FY 2021 68 FY 2022 0 ** FY 2023 100 FY 2024 130 FY 2025 0 ** FY 2026 152 FY 2027 191 FY 2028 76 FY 2029 49

** There were no graduating State Police Recruit classes that occurred 25 years prior. The projected eligible enlisted to retire in these years, based on enrollment date, is zero. This chart does not project eligible enlisted that may delay retirement.

# OF TROOPERS *AVG. REACHING AMT. OF TIME RETIREMENT # OF TROOPERS RETIRED AFTER YEAR ELIGIBILITY SEPARATED/ RETIRED ELIGIBILITY 2016 139 58 2.1 2017 74 33 4.5 2018 66 27 4 2019 48 16 4

It should be noted that the numbers above for troopers separated/retired is inclusive of members who left the division for any number of reasons, e.g. retirement, disability, terminated, deceased, etc.

All retirements will affect the minority ratio. Currently, DSP has seen in a rise in the percentages of minorities in the Division, but with the possible retirement of hundreds of

36 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

troopers in the upcoming years DSP will have to continue recruit so that the Division represents the residents of New Jersey.

Below is the statistical overview by gender and ethnicity within the DSP as of the close of FY 2018:

37 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

Below is the gender and minority breakdown, by rank, for the DSP:

8b. The FY 2020 Budget in Brief cites as a component of savings initiatives reflected in the FY 2020 budget a substantial reduction in State Police overtime hours through organizational and personnel changes (page 11). No quantification of this reduction, in terms of hours or expenditures, is provided elsewhere, nor is there any elaboration on the organizational and personnel changes that led to the reduction.

38 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

• Question: Please describe each specific organizational and personnel changes that reduced State Police overtime hours, and the number of reduced hours and expenditures attributable to each. What portion of the expenditure reductions accrued to the New Jersey Turnpike Authority and the South Jersey Transportation Authority, respectively? Were overtime reductions achieved through collective bargaining or by managerial decisions that did not require concurrence via contract negotiations?

The Division's overtime reduction can be deemed attributable to the increase in management accountability. In FY 2018, overtime was identified as increasing beyond the budget amount. The Division constructed a detailed overtime report that was provided to the command staff every pay period delineating all overtime earned. Any variances would be discussed and addressed by management. By FY 2019, overtime amounts had been reduced and more aligned with budget goals. The overtime report is now distributed every 6 pay periods to the command staff in which they continue to monitor closely for compliance.

The Turnpike and South Jersey Transportation Authority (ACE) have separate accounts and have no effect on the reduced overtime number.

Managerial oversight and accountability did not require concurrence via contract negotiations.

• Question: Please provide the annual amount of overtime the DSP paid to staff, separated by civilian and enlisted staff, in fiscal years 2018 and 2019, and the amount projected for FY 2020. Please provide information on any salary increases or stipends available to members of the Division of State Police who pursue and obtain a specialty skill set.

DSP Enlisted and Civilian Overtime History FY 2018- FY 2020

BFY Enlisted Civilian Total 2018 $34,155,506 $6,012,603 $40,168,109 2019* $31,236,600 $4,663,547 $35,900,147 2020** $34,000,000 $4,700,000 $38,700,000

Includes regular and supplemental overtime payments. All Enlisted supplemental overtime is billable.

39 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

* FY2019 projected overtime is based on actual overtime costs through Pay Period 6/ Supplemental F.

** FY2020 projection is increased due to the assumption of higher salary costs related to pending contract settlements.

The DSP Aviators receive a stipend of $150 per pay period for their specialty skill. In addition, Troopers who serve as a coach for a recently graduated Trooper through the Trooper Coach Program will receive a $500 stipend at the conclusion of the three month post-graduation program.

9a. According to the National Police Foundation, marijuana legalization in states such as Colorado has posed significant challenges for law enforcement, stemming from the unanticipated consequences legalization has had on crime and public safety. Exploratory research conducted by the National Police Foundation, in partnership with the Colorado Association of Chiefs of Police, has led to suggestions for law enforcement in states where marijuana may become legalized. These suggestions include: law enforcement establishing data collection systems, licensing and registration protocol; establishing guidelines in advance for search and seizures in illegal home growing operations; and evaluating the impact of marijuana use by minors on health and public safety.

• Question: What steps has the Attorney General’s office taken, in anticipation of the legalization of marijuana in New Jersey, to learn from both the intended and unintended consequences that have arisen, particularly the challenges that have been created for law enforcement, in states that have legalized marijuana? Please provide the position of the Attorney General regarding planning for additional training of law enforcement Statewide on the new laws regarding recreational marijuana.

The Department has been preparing for the impending legalization of marijuana since December 2017, and DSP has been aware of the significant challenges for law enforcement and consequences on public safety.

The Department has done significant research, including reviewing the situation in states like Colorado, for educational purposes and to establish guidelines in advance for law enforcement on how to properly conduct search and seizures for illegal marijuana operations 40 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

in jurisdiction with legal cannabis activity. Law enforcement agencies will need to be trained on what they can and cannot do when they suspect someone is possessing, distributing, or consuming cannabis or marijuana.

DSP is preparing for the impact of how legal cannabis activity will affect public safety on roadways. Law enforcement agencies need methods to detect whether someone is under the influence of marijuana when conducting vehicle stops or post-crash investigations. This is challenging because there is not yet an analog “breathalyzer test” for marijuana. One resource need identified was the need to increase the number of Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) and other police drug recognition training.

DSP contacted each of the nine states in which recreational marijuana use has been legalized to request information on policies for the enforcement of driving under the influence of marijuana. No state has implemented a testing device to measure the level of the active ingredient in marijuana, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), that may be administered during a motor vehicle stop or during an investigation after a crash. Instead, the most prevalent policy in each state is to contact a DRE and obtain blood or urine samples from the operator. Other training issues impacted by this proposal include the use of drug recognition canines. Members of the Division’s Canine Unit contacted their counterparts in California, Colorado, Oregon and Vermont and found they no longer use marijuana in their scent detection training.

9b. New Jersey handler-canine drug detection teams are currently trained to detect marijuana. Assembly Bill No. 3622 of 2018 establishes the "Advisory Committee on Law Enforcement Handler-Canine Training." The advisory committee is charged with: 1) analyzing current State oversight of the training of handler-canine teams used for the purposes of law enforcement and making recommendations, if necessary, to improve the training process; 2) studying and analyzing the economic and social impact of the potential legalization of marijuana in New Jersey on handler-canine training; and 3) examining, considering, and making recommendations pertaining to changes required in handler-canine training for effective implementation of marijuana laws and policies. This advisory committee will provide the Attorney General with recommendations on any needed changes to the training of handler-canine drug detection teams should marijuana be legalized in New Jersey. A recent court opinion issued in Colorado suggests that if marijuana is legalized in New Jersey, these drug detection dogs may need to be replaced. The Colorado Court of Appeals determined that people have a "legitimate expectation of privacy" when they possess something legal, such as marijuana. The court found that dogs trained to detect marijuana

41 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

may put prosecutors at risk of having other evidence suppressed, even if it is evidence of a crime or offense.

It appears that the last time the K-9 Training Standards and Qualification Requirements for New Jersey Law Enforcement was revised most recently in 2002.

• Question: Please provide information on any updates to the training standards for these teams, specifically, in relation to legalization of recreational marijuana Please provide the number of handler-canine teams in New Jersey by specialty. Please provide the number of handler-canine drug detection teams in New Jersey that currently are trained to detect marijuana and the number that are now trained without the ability to detect marijuana. Please provide the number of canine training facilities in New Jersey. Please provide the estimated cost to train canine detection teams.

The canine training standards have not changed in relation to the possibility of the legalization of recreational marijuana in New Jersey. The consensus of the canine community is that the training standards will officially change once a final decision on the legalization of marijuana is made. Once a canine is imprinted on marijuana it is not possible to retrain the canine to ignore the odor.

There are five canine training academies in New Jersey that consistently train and certify a large number of canine teams on an annual basis. There are a number of other certified canine trainers throughout New Jersey that train and certify individual canine teams on a yearly basis. The DSP Canine Academy has stopped imprinting narcotic detection canines on the odor of marijuana. The DSP Canine Response and Training Unit currently has two narcotic detection canines that are not imprinted on marijuana. These teams can be brought back to the canine training academy and imprinted on marijuana in approximately one week if necessary. Listed below is information associated with the other five canine training academies:

• Morris County Sherriff’s Department – Still imprint on MJ • Voorhees Township (Camden County) Police Department – Still imprint on MJ • Passaic County Sheriff’s Department – No longer imprint on Marijuana (MJ) • Tinton Falls Police Department – No longer imprint on MJ • Atlantic County Police Canine Academy – Allows for agency to choose (6 of 10 narcotic canines not trained for MJ in last class)

42 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

There are approximately 114 narcotic detection teams throughout the state of New Jersey. Of those 114 teams only 14 are not imprinted on marijuana. The Detect and Render Safe Task Force consists of 78 explosive detection teams from 38 different agencies. There are approximately 25 additional explosive detection teams that are not Task Force members. There are 2 certified cadaver detection teams throughout New Jersey. The NJSP Canine Unit Electronic Storage Device detection team is the only one in the state. The NJSP currently has four Vapor Wake detection teams that are pending certification/approval from the NJSP Canine Training Academy.

There are six canine training academies that offer regular patrol and scent detection classes in New Jersey. There are several other certified canine trainers that train and certify both patrol and scent detection teams. A canine handler can become a certified trainer after handling a canine for a minimum of five years and assisting with a class of at least ten canine teams.

The average scent detection class is approximately 3 months. The cost to purchase a dog varies and can be purchased for as little as $7,500 and can cost as much as $10,000. The estimated cost to train a new detection team is $45,000. The estimated cost is based on the price of a dog and the salary of the handler for the 3 month time period to attend the scent detection school.

10a. New Jersey reportedly has 458 drug recognition experts (DRE’s) as of 2018. Further, it was reported that in 2018 DRE programs existed in nine counties and are funded with grants from the New Jersey Division of Highway Traffic Safety. Typically, 50 officers are trained every year in two classes. It is expected that there will be additional classes planned to increase the state's DRE officers by 75.

• Question: Please provide the current number of drug recognition experts (DRE’s) in the State. Please provide the administration’s plan to ensure all municipalities have sufficient number of DRE’s on staff to cover the majority of shifts. Is the Attorney General, or are the local law enforcement agencies, maintaining records of when a DRE is requested in response to a motor vehicle stop and to what extent they are available? What is the estimated cost to train a DRE? Are any grants being provided to support counties and municipalities to ensure a sufficient number of DRE’s are trained?

43 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

There are currently 519 trained and certified Drug Recognition Experts (Officers) in the State of New Jersey. The NJSP Alcohol & Drug Testing Unit trains 80 – 100 new DREs each year at a cost of approximately $266.00 per student (cost of materials). DRE training is nine classroom dates followed by three to four days of field certifications, and then two days of final training and an exam. Attrition of certified DREs accounts for the loss of approximately 50 DREs each year. DHTS supports the training of DREs through grant monies utilized for the salaries of ADTU personnel as well as the cost of all training materials.

When choosing students to attend DRE training, agencies that do not have any DREs or a disproportionately low number of DREs are given preference if their recommended student meets the standards. Then the selections are based on the agency’s total number of DREs, the agency’s need for a DRE based on the call outs that they have made, as well as their total number of DWI arrests.

The DSP Regional Operations and Intelligence Center maintains the records for the number of NJSP call outs to assist local agencies and some to DSP call outs, as the DSP may call in off duty Troopers on their own. There are currently 9 counties that have established a call out program, (Monmouth, Atlantic, Cape May, Bergen, Morris, Sussex, Ocean, Somerset and Hunterdon). These counties maintain their own records for municipal call outs. Counties that do not have a call out system maintain the records within each department. If the call out is not a DSP call out to a municipal agency or in a county with a call out program, they are not recorded.

DSP is exploring funding DRE recall programs to assist other Counties within the Federal Fiscal Year 2020 NJ Highway Safety Plan. Local and county agencies, as well as DSP, also receive funding from the Drunk Driving Enforcement Fund and Bottle Tax which may be used for DRE costs.

DRE training costs approximately $8,000 per class of 30 students or $267 per student. The Division of Highway Traffic Safety (DHTS) supports both the DSP Alcohol and Drug Testing Unit (ADTU) as well as County and local law enforcement with grant monies, which support the use and training of drug recognition experts. DHTS has also been working closely with State and County Traffic Officers Associations to develop and support response protocols. DHTS supports this program through 406d grant monies, which are used to pay for the DRE overtime for recall as well as associated court appearances. DSP maintains a record of all requests and responses for NJSP DREs. The DHTS maintains a record of DRE hours billed to the grant, and the Counties and local PDs maintain more specific records on costs and time.

44 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

10b. The State Police offers an Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) program to “bridge the gap” between the standardized field sobriety course and the DRE course. The purpose of the ARIDE course is to impart general knowledge to police officers of drug impairment and the signs and symptoms of seven categories of drugs.

• Question: How many law enforcement officers Statewide have taken the ARIDE course? Please provide a breakout by State, county and municipal law enforcement officers. Which municipalities have sent the officers for this training? Is the ARIDE course an on-line course? Is there any classroom component of the course? What is the estimated cost of ARIDE training? Are any grants being provided to support counties and municipalities to provide ARIDE training?

The total number of law enforcement officers that have taken the ARIDE course is 1,115 (Classroom instruction – 826 since 2017 to present and online instruction – 289 from 2015 to 12/22/2018). The projected number of students ADTU will train in ARIDE for 2019 is 1,350. In 2015 DSP stopped offering the classroom training in favor of piloting online ARIDE training as requested by the federal government. In 2017 the State Chiefs of Police requested DSP bring back the classroom ARIDE training.

Of the 826 total ARIDE classroom trained students (since 2017) 182 are State Troopers and 644 local or county officers. Of the 289 online trained ARIDE students 24 are State Troopers and 265 are local or county officers.

The ARIDE online course is 4 hours, as opposed to the classroom training, which is 2 days. (The online course does not include Standard Field Sobriety Testing Refresher training, which is incorporated into classroom training. Students electing for online AIRDE training must first demonstrate proficiency in the administration of that test.)

The DSP offers a 2-day course all over the State, with 46 total classes scheduled for 2019. DSP has held additional classes in some counties at their request to meet their needs, ex. Monmouth in 2017 and 2018, Somerset in 2019. Not one Officer/Trooper has been or will be denied the training if they meet the pre-requisite, which is that they would have to had attended the DSP Driving While Intoxicated Course. The ARIDE classroom training also serves as an SFST refresher class which is essential to ensure that the students are performing the SFSTs properly.

45 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

There is no cost to attend the DSP ARIDE classroom training or the online training. All ARIDE classroom training is performed by DSP ADTU members. The online training is through the U.S. Department of Transportation.

10c. There are concerns that the expected legalization of recreational marijuana will result in an increased demand for DRE’s and officers with ARIDE training.

• Question: Are the current DRE and ARIDE training programs sufficient to meet the likely increased demand for these trained officers? Is additional State funding needed to meet this demand? If so, please estimate the amount required.

ARIDE: The NJSP has increased the number of live classroom ARIDE classes from 10 and 13 in 2017 and 2018 respectively, to 46 for 2019. It is anticipated that 1,350 officers will attend and complete ARIDE training in 2019, which is almost 1,000 more officers than were trained in 2018. Additionally, the NJSP has advised that all officers and troopers who request this two-day ARIDE training will be accommodated. Classes can and will also be added as needed. The request for seats in the ARIDE training will likely increase if recreational cannabis is legalized. ARIDE training ensures that these troopers and officers will be able to detect the observable signs and symptoms of drug impairment and arrest the drug-impaired drivers that might otherwise go undetected.

DRE: New Jersey currently has the second largest number of DREs in the Country, second to California. Nationwide less than 1% of police officers are DREs. The reason for this is the intensity of the course of study. Although California has more total DREs than New Jersey, both States have approximately the same percentage of DRE’s (1.5% of officers in both States are DREs). For comparison, Colorado has approximately 11,402 law enforcement officers and 198 DREs, which is 1.7% of its law enforcement population. New Jersey has increased the number of certified DREs every year since 2015 (see Attachment F).

DSP is training 3 classes of DREs per year, for a total of 80 to 90 DREs. DSP has increased the number DREs each year since 2015.

Additional funding would be needed, likely from federally funded Highway Traffic Safety grants, if DSP increased the number of DRE students trained per year. The estimated cost would depend on the number of classes added; it costs approximately $8,000 per class of 30 students or $267 per student.

46 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

ADTU has developed an 8 hour DID (Drug Impaired Driving) training. This class will serve as an introduction to drug impaired driving and any law enforcement officer in the State can attend this course, as there are no prerequisites. The ADTU is performing this training for the first time this year. DSP has 20 classes scheduled for 2019. This class is a familiarization of the SFSTs and an overview of signs and symptoms of drug impaired subjects.

11a. As of July 1, 2016, the operations of the SouthSTAR MedEvac ceased after 28 years of service and an estimated 25,000 missions. NorthSTAR MedEvac continues to provide service. Since 1988, the State funded the air medical services team for trauma situations at little to no cost to those requiring the service. The Department of Health provides medical staffing through contracts with hospitals, and the Division of State Police maintains the helicopters and provides the pilots.

A $3 surcharge continues to be imposed on motor vehicle registrations, which are statutorily dedicated to MedEvac services and equipment pursuant to section 1 of P.L.1992, c.87 (C.39:3- 8.2). Budget language allows this funding to also be used for the State Police general aviation program and for other State Police purposes unrelated to MedEvac services.

• Question: Please provide a spending plan for MedEvac services in FY 2019 and FY 2020, showing the allocation of resources in the New Jersey Emergency Medical Service Helicopter Response Program Fund in each fiscal year between the Department of Health and the Division of State Police. Also, please provide a spending plan for resources from the fund allocated to the State Police general aviation program. What specific activities and functions comprise the general aviation program in the current fiscal year and in FY 2020?

The projected spending plan for MedEvac services for FY 2019 and FY 2020 is as follows:

Medevac FY 2019 FY 2020 DSP - Aviation $10m $10m DOH $2.5m $2.5m Total $12.5m $12.5m

The final helicopter line of credit payment for $8.1 million was made in FY 2018.

47 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

The projected spending plan for the Division of State Police Aviation program is below:

DSP Medevac FY 2019 FY 2020 Salary, Cash in lieu and fringe $4.3m $4.5m Materials and Supplies $1.2m $1.2m Services other than Personal $1m $800k Maintenance and Fixed Charges $3.5m $3.5m Total: $10m $10m

The Aviation Bureau provides emergency medical evacuations (Medevac) transportation of seriously injured victims of motor vehicle, industrial, and recreational accidents, etc. to trauma centers through the JEMSTAR program. It also provides air support for the various commands within DSP, to other law enforcement agencies that request assistance, and Homeland Security activities.

The Aviation Bureau is responsible to maintain its fleet of aircraft in compliance with all applicable Federal Aviation regulations, airworthiness directives, manufacturer's service bulletins, and Aviation Maintenance Manual procedures, and ensure that all Aviation Bureau maintenance technicians are properly trained and certified to maintain bureau aircraft in an airworthy condition at all times. The Aviation Bureau trains its pilots through the Aviation Bureau’s Operations Manual. In addition, all pilots meet F.A.A. recency of experience requirements with regard to night operation, instrument currency, and flight reviews.

11b. In response to an OLS FY 2019 discussion point, the department indicated that the New Jersey State Police Aviation Bureau manages and operates a fleet of eight helicopters: Five Agusta AW139s, two Bell 206 LongRangers, and one OH-58 helicopter.

• Question: What is the current size of the Division of State Police helicopter fleet? What is the age of each helicopter? Are the payments for the helicopter fleet complete? If not, please provide a schedule of remaining payment. How many flights occurred in FY 2018 and how many are projected to occur in FY 2019, respectively? In each year, what proportion of those flights are MedEvac flights and general aviation flights, respectively? Please provide the number of days in FY 2018 and thus far in FY 2019 that each aircraft in the fleet was grounded for maintenance and repair. What was the cost of fleet maintenance in FY 2018? What is the estimated annual FY 2019 and FY 2020 maintenance cost? What is the average cost per flight?

48 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

The New Jersey State Police Aviation Bureau manages and operates a fleet of eight (8) helicopters;

Five (5) Agusta AW139s, Two (2) Bell 206 LongRangers, One (1) OH-58 Military Surplus helicopter (similar to the Bell 206 JetRanger)

Tail Type Registration Number Year N1NJ AW139 2011 N3NJ AW139 2012 N5NJ AW139 2011 N7NJ AW139 2011 N9NJ AW139 2011 N2NJ Bell 206L3 1985 N4NJ** OH–58A 1970 N6NJ Bell 206L4 1995

** N4NJ is a military surplus aircraft. It must be operated under ‘Public Use’ guidelines as prescribed by the FAA and DoD. It has no resale value and must be returned to the DoD if NJSP does not maintain and/or operate it.

The final helicopter line of credit payment for $8.1 million was made in FY 2018.

Fiscal Year Missions / Flights FY18 3624/1653

FY19 YTD/ 3484/1569 Projected FY20 3550/1600 Projected

Total missions/flights will reflect differently from specific categories as numerous details are usually completed during a mission/flight.

49 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

Homeland Security, Port Security, Total MedEvac General Police, Searches, Missions / Flights Assignments Transportation,Etc. FY18 3624 267 3357

FY19 YTD 3484 226 3258 Projected

FY20 3575 250 3325 Projected

The total number of days an aircraft is/was grounded is difficult to determine. In some cases, weekends, holidays, and other factors contributed to the number of days an aircraft may have been out of service. Additionally, there are times NJSP puts an aircraft down to complete maintenance, however, if needed it could be quickly be returned to service. The numbers below represent best estimates.

AW139s Bell 206s OH-58 1NJ 3NJ 5NJ 7NJ 9NJ 2NJ 6NJ 4NJ FY 18 75 74 90 155 30 45 79 184

FY19 49 120 67 24 101 44 57 102 Thus Far

The cost of the fleet maintenance in FY 2018 was $2,182,959.60.

50 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

Aircraft Maintenance Costs

FY 19 $ 3,300,000 Projected

FY20 $ 3,300,000

The average cost per flight hour for the AW139s is $2,500 and $500 per flight hour for the Bell aircraft.

12a. The Department of Law and Public Safety (DLPS) requested $4.9 million for three capital projects. These projects include technology updates and critical repairs. Of the requested amount, $3.859 million was recommended by the commission for a computer network upgrade for the New Jersey State Police headquarters for 24/7 access to law enforcement and homeland security application and data ($3,359,000) and a microwave link upgrade at both the Berlin and Bordentown DSP Stations ($500,000).

The JJC requested $22.7 million for 29 capital projects. Of this amount: $11 million was for construction projects, including facility renovations and upgrades; $9.8 million was for preservation projects, including HVAC and roof replacements, critical repairs and security enhancements; $796,000 was for infrastructure projects; $665,000 was for environmental projects; and $500,000 was planned for compliance projects.

Of the amount requested by the JJC, according to the capital commission no funding was recommended due to fiscal restraints.

• Question: Does the FY2020 budget provide funding for any of the above requested projects? Please provide a list of the capital needs of DLPS, including JJC, which the DLPS expects will be met in FY 2020 and the expected funding sources. For the projects not funded from these sources, how does the DLPS and the JJC, respectively, intend to meet the capital needs outlined in their requests to the commission? Please provide a list of all completed DLPS, including JJC, capital projects completed in FY 2018 and FY 2019. Please include an overview of the costs associated with the Bordentown Juvenile Medium Secure Facility (JMSF) basement redesign which will provide alternate classroom space.

51 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

The Commission on Capital Budgeting and Planning has recommended a computer network upgrade for the New Jersey State Police (DSP) headquarters for 24/7 access to law enforcement and homeland security application and data ($3,359,000) and a microwave link upgrade at both the Berlin and Bordentown DSP Stations ($500,000). The third capital request for a needed repair to the Weights and Measure in Avenel parking lot was not recommended.

Computer Network Upgrade

Recently, portions of the base network have shown signs of failure due to degradation and attenuation across the fiber as well as the end of life equipment. The network equipment has become problematic requiring regular restarts to maintain normal operation. The aged equipment, coupled with the failing fiber optic cable causes latency and outages.

A failure on one of these crucial network nodes will inhibit real-time access to critical information and could be a potential safety issue to officers and the general public. Due to the broad range of locations and units serviced by this network, a single failure could interrupt access across multiple systems and applications. In addition, the current infrastructure does not have the bandwidth capacity to keep up with the future growth of the DSP information systems.

Microwave Link Upgrade

DSP seeks to upgrade and replace the existing microwave links from Bordentown, New Jersey to Berlin, New Jersey. A modern microwave link network can deliver bandwidth in a dependable, cost-effective, and flexible manner in addition to reliable operating distances. This is a critical aspect in managing a communications network and to protect the citizens of the state and maintain the safety of DSP Troopers.

In FY 2019, DSP received $500,000 in capital funding to update the 911 Call Center in Hamilton. The project is in progress for approximately $418,532.

In FY 2018, DSP received $1.1 million in capital funding to replace the boilers at the Troop A Headquarters in Buena Vista. A consulting engineer was hired to conduct a study and develop a scope of work. The scope of work has been completed and is currently under review.

The FY 2020 budget for the Juvenile Justice Commission (JJC) does not include funding for the projects that were submitted to the Capital Commission. Without these funds, these projects will have to remain on hold until the request for funding is submitted for FY 2021.

52 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

JJC Capital Projects completed in FY2018 and FY2019:

Project Description Completed Location Status Cost FY Staircase Structural Repairs Warren RCH Complete $202,187 2018 Security Camera Project JMSF/Hayes Complete $441,654 2018 Phase III Heat NJTSB Complete $7,476,822 2018 Chiller Replacement Valentine Hall Complete $294,553 2019

The redesign of the basement for use as an alternative classroom of the Juvenile Medium Secure Facility (JMSF) has begun. The design has been completed for a cost of $508,215. The remaining funding of $3,299,505 is in place. The Division of Property Management & Construction (DPMC) is preparing the project for advertising. The project will be advertised for 3 weeks followed by the scheduling of the pre-bid meeting with the responding vendors.

12b. In response to an OLS discussion point during the FY 2019 budget process, the department noted that both the New Jersey Training School for Boys, Jamesburg, in Monroe Township and the Juvenile Female Secure Care and Intake Facility, Hayes, in Bordentown were scheduled for closure upon the opening of the new regional facilities.

Last year the Department estimated that the three facilities (48 beds each) would be operational in four to five years, with the southern and central region facilities operational by in January of 2022 and the northern facility operational by September of 2022.

The closing of these facilities is part of the JJC plan to improve outcomes for youth with smaller regional facilities, which are closer to home to maximize opportunities for family participation in the juveniles’ rehabilitative process.

• Question: Please provide an updated timetable or schedule for the new JJC facilities and the planned closure dates for the existing facilities. What is the estimated cost to build each facility? Does the JJC anticipate needing additional correction and civilian personnel to staff three facilities versus two? If so, please provide the JCC’s anticipated staffing plan.

The JJC intends to replace the New Jersey Training School and Hayes with three (3) smaller (48 bed), state-of-the art regional facilities. The new facilities will represent best practice in terms of design features that simultaneously enhance the safety of staff and youth while fostering the delivery of therapeutic services in a normative, developmentally appropriate

53 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

environment that feels non-institutional. Typically, projects of this magnitude take 4-5 years to complete. The project team has experienced delays in developing the prototypical design. At present, JJC projects completion of the Southern and Central Region Facilities in October 2024 while the Northern Facility will likely be completed approximately one year later.

The actual closure of the New Jersey Training School and Hayes will occur after the completion of new facilities and when judged occupant-ready. Please note that the timetables are estimates subject to change based on developments in design and construction.

Estimated Cost

The JJC and Department are currently undergoing a review of the project’s needs to determine the total cost for each of the proposed facilities.

Staffing:

At this juncture, the JJC does not anticipate needing additional personnel to staff the three new facilities. As the project proceeds, JJC will conduct a full staffing analysis to further refine projections based up developments.

13a. In early 2018, the Attorney General announced several new initiatives to take steps in restoring the trust between law enforcement officers and agencies and the communities they serve.

During the FY 2019 budget process, the Attorney General outlined several new initiatives to create better law enforcement and community relations by: 1) establishing the Community- Law Enforcement Affirmative Relations (CLEAR) – Continuing Education Institute; 2) strengthening community policing efforts; 3) establishing the 21 county, 21st century project to bring together law enforcement officers and community stakeholders four times a year to discuss certain topics affecting the community; and 4) promoting the existing “Stop Safe” initiative to teach drivers the proper behavior during traffic stops.

In addition, the Attorney General issued a number of directives concerning law enforcement body worn cameras and stored recordings, the release of video recordings depicting deadly force incidents, mandatory drug testing, the establishment of an early warning system to

54 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

detect “bad actors” in law enforcement, and Statewide standards on conducting certain police investigations.

• Question: Please provide an updated overview of the success, or failures, of these initiatives. Please elaborate on the current Statewide training of law enforcement officers in regards to implicit bias and cultural awareness, as well as how to interact with and recognize individuals with mental health, autism, and other disabilities. Please elaborate on any additional initiatives that this administration will implement to examine law enforcement officers who have a history as “bad actors” to ensure Statewide consistency regarding fairness and transparency. What funds are anticipated to be allocated toward these initiatives in FY 2020? How has the Attorney General promoted diversity among all New Jersey law enforcement agencies? How has the department assisted in creating advancement opportunities for women and persons of color who may have been marginalized in the typically male, Caucasian law enforcement field?

Every day, law enforcement officers across the state work closely with members of the public to keep New Jersey’s streets safe. But more can always be done to strengthen ties between law enforcement and the communities they serve. Throughout 2018, Attorney General Grewal has worked to build bridges, facilitate communication, and bolster trust—not simply because it is the right thing to do, but because community-oriented policing improves the work of law enforcement and promotes public safety. Attorney General Grewal has supplemented these efforts by issuing a number of statewide law enforcement policies, known as “AG Directives,” which are binding on New Jersey’s 36,000 state and local police officers and are designed to promote accountability, transparency, and trust in law enforcement.

Shortly after taking office, Attorney General Grewal launched a statewide community policing initiative known as the 21 County, 21st Century Community Policing Project, or simply “21/21.” The premise of the 21/21 Project is simple: on a quarterly basis, each of New Jersey’s 21 County Prosecutors is responsible for hosting a discussion between law enforcement leaders and community stakeholders on a specific policing issue, ultimately resulting in more than 80 community meetings across the state each year. During its first quarter, the 21/21 Project tackled the issue of officer-involved shooting investigations; subsequent quarters addressed the opioid crisis, immigration enforcement, and bias crimes.

55 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

Topics for 2019 include juvenile justice, environmental justice, elder abuse, campus sexual violence, and military and veterans affairs.

When developing new law enforcement policies, the Attorney General’s Office has worked hard to solicit input from a range of voices, including state and local law enforcement officers, civil rights leaders, community advocates, and members of the public. This collaborative approach has helped Attorney General Grewal build consensus on the most challenging policy issues and ensure that all relevant parties feel heard on the topics that affect them most.

The Attorney General has worked hard to strengthen police-community relations in immigrant communities as well. In November 2018, Attorney General Grewal issued the “Immigrant Trust Directive” to strengthen trust between law enforcement and the state’s diverse immigrant communities. The Directive limits the types of voluntary assistance that New Jersey’s state and local law enforcement officers may provide to federal immigrant authorities, including ICE, and emphasizes that New Jersey state, county, and local authorities are responsible for the enforcement of criminal law, not federal civil immigration law. One of the purposes of the new rules is to ensure that victims and witnesses can report crimes to law enforcement without fear that they will be turned over to federal immigration authorities.

CLEAR INSTITUTE

There have been numerous statewide training initiatives through the attorney general’s Community Law Enforcement Affirmative Relations (CLEAR) Institute concerning cultural diversity, interacting with individuals with special needs, and de-escalation.

In 2017, all law enforcement officers were required to take a six hour course entitled Police Response: De-Escalation Techniques for Individuals with Special Needs. The course was dual taught with a trained mental health worker and a law enforcement officer. The mental health worker would discuss how a person with different types of special needs, mental health issues, or developmental disabilities would present to a responding law enforcement officer. Autism was discussed in this course. A law enforcement officer taught how to specifically de-escalate an individual in crises with different special needs, mental health issues, and developmental disabilities which included autism. Law enforcement officers will be required to take this course again in 2022. The curriculum from this course is being inserted in all PTC certified academies in 2019.

56 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

In 2018, all law enforcement officers were required to take a three hour course entitled cultural diversity, de-escalation, and bias reporting. Included in this course was training concerning implicit bias. The curriculum from this course is being inserted in all PTC certified academies in 2019.

IMPLICIT BIAS TRAINING

In June, 2018, Attorney General Grewal mandated that by the close of 2019, all of our State Police and all prosecutors and detectives in the Division of Criminal Justice and in all of the 21 County Prosecutors’ offices are to be trained on implicit bias.

PROSECUTORS: Specialized course content, geared specifically toward the work that prosecutors do was jointly created by the Office of the Attorney General and the Prosecutors Supervision and Training Bureau of the Division of Criminal Justice. To-date, over 51% of the approximately 1,100 county and state prosecutors have completed this training, and additional training sessions have been scheduled throughout the state during 2019 to assure accessibility and availability for the remaining prosecutors.

POLICE: Given the unique challenges of police work, OAG has extensively researched and assessed specialized implicit bias training that has proven effective with this specialized group. To that end, the Department anticipates providing this training for all state police and division of criminal justice detectives during the annual mandatory in-service training held at the state police academy in the fall of 2019. Additionally, OAG is putting a plan in place to train detectives from each of the 21 County Prosecutor’s offices to be able to deliver the same training in their home counties.

In September, 2018, Attorney General Grewal announced the creation of the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability (OPIA). OPIA is a team of prosecutors and detectives tasked with rooting out corruption and misconduct in state and local government. OPIA also handles criminal civil rights investigations, including excessive force by police. In the near future, OPIA will stand up a new state-wide conviction review unit to consider substantial claims of actual innocence.

To run the unit, the Attorney General recruited a thirty-year veteran of the Justice Department, who previously served as the Chief of the Criminal Division at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Newark and served on the Attorney General’s Advisory committee. OPIA reports directly to the Attorney General.

57 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

One of the main projects undertaken by OPIA is the Use of Force Data Collection and Analysis Project.

In November, 2018, the Star-Ledger began publishing a series of articles about the gaps in the uniformity of New Jersey’s use-of-force data collection efforts. The newspaper also unveiled their own public-facing use-of-force database, populated with information collected from the New Jersey State Police and the hundreds of municipal police departments. Through Open Public Records Act requests, the Star-Ledger gathered use-of-force reports from 2012-2016 from police departments across the state. The newspaper articles and the use-of-force database make one thing clear: although individual municipalities, departments, or counties may have effective systems in place, New Jersey’s statewide data collection system requires a complete overhaul.

In December, 2018, the Attorney General, along with law enforcement leaders across the state, announced a joint effort to overhaul the statewide data collection system. The new system for obtaining use-of-force data in New Jersey anticipates:

(1) Standardizing the process that state, county, and local law enforcement agencies use to record use-of-force incidents and report them to the State, including through the use of standardized electronic forms; (2) Identifying ways to contextualize use-of-force incidents with accurate information about the officers’ actions; (3) Identifying academic institutions to partner with the State of New Jersey to help analyze use-of-force data and ensure the rigor of the state’s data collection efforts; (4) Examining how data can be stored and made available for analysis to prosecutors, police chiefs, and the public;

(5) Reviewing the substance of use of force policies, including policies on less than lethal force and conductive energy devices as well as early warning and early intervention systems and directives to ensure best practice; and

(6) Hosting listening sessions throughout the state to hear directly from the public on this issue. To date, we’ve held listening sessions in Bridgeton and at Central High School in Newark, with sessions being scheduled for Atlantic City and Trenton this month.

The FY 2020 Budget in Brief indicates that the FY2020 budget will include $1 million for the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability within the Office of the Attorney General.

58 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

In addition to the multiple training programs described above, as one of Attorney General Grewal’s diversity initiatives, each division of the Department of Law and Public Safety was tasked with creating and submitting a divisional diversity and inclusion plan for 2019. To inform that process, the Department’s Chief Diversity Officer created and distributed a planning guide and separately met with each division’s leadership team. By doing so, the divisions were provided with a foundational understanding of the elements of a comprehensive diversity and inclusion program – one that looks to measures beyond just recruiting new personnel, to address issues that may disproportionately impact underrepresented groups, such as people of color, LGBTQ personnel, and women. As a result, the submitted plans include goals to reduce workplace isolation and exclusion from informal groups and networks that can contribute to retention issues, and seek to improve access for all personnel to career development information and opportunities. The Division of State Police and the Division of Criminal Justice – our two divisions employing sworn police and prosecutors – have developed and formalized their own plans, in accordance with the Attorney General’s direction.

The State Police plan is focused on goals relating to enhancing employee engagement (with the benefit being improved retention); publishing clear criteria for career path opportunities; diversity and inclusion training for both enlisted and civilian personnel; and initiatives directed toward strengthening community relations.

The Division of Criminal Justice plan includes a number of recruiting initiatives, employee engagement goals, and mentoring and professional development programs.

On a department-wide basis, there are various diversity initiatives in place that impact our law enforcement divisions. For example, the department has fostered the creation of employee-led resource groups across different dimensions of diversity and currently has 5 employee resource groups (ERGs) that organize events and programs for their members as well as for the department. These 5 groups have been formed for Black, Latino, Asian, LGBTQ, and women employees and their allies. Notably, the Department’s women’s ERG hosted a program featuring women in law enforcement that included a panel comprised of enlisted members of State Police and DCJ detectives.

In addition to the initiatives described above, the Department has taken steps to increase the diversity among our law enforcement ranks in the critical pipeline and recruitment process.

59 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

The recruiting bureau of the DSP continues to address the underrepresentation of minority candidates by employing robust recruiting techniques such as posting event information on social media platforms and radio broadcasts and hosting career nights and in-person events. DSP maintains strong partnerships with community stakeholders in an effort to utilize their respective connections to broadcast the need for diverse, qualified candidates throughout the recruitment process. Additionally, in preparation for the academy, the recruiting bureau works with community leaders to identify and coordinate swimming lessons for those applicants who have difficulty swimming. Lessons have been offered at churches and local pools. DSP’s partnerships with community stakeholders are dynamic and new ideas are continuously explored. Diverse and inclusive focus groups of enlisted personnel have been recently created in order to examine the process used to recruit troopers in order to better target our efforts for success.

DSP is utilizing a van at community outreach and recruiting events. This allows potential applicants to come and speak with recruiters and receive information about the state police. Interested persons can complete applications on-site because the van is equipped with computers and internet service. The recruiting bureau has also updated brochures and fliers to market the diverse personnel and opportunities within the state police. These materials are available at community outreach and recruiting events.

During the selection process for candidate for the state police academy, DSP ensures candidates are interviewed by diverse personnel during the Candidate Review Boards (CRBs). The CRB panel members, both enlisted personnel and OAG members, reflect the diversity of the applicants being interviewed and of the population the division serves. Importantly, all CRB members receive training on implicit bias prior to serving on the board. Additionally, in order to improve retention throughout the recruitment and selection process, state police has strengthened its mentoring program with applicants, recruits, and newly enlisted troopers.

As part of its selection process for filling job vacancies for detectives, DCJ regularly requires that candidates submit writing samples. Given the lessons learned about implicit bias, DCJ now requires that these submissions be anonymized in order to reduce the risk that unconscious associations about race, ethnicity, or gender influence the evaluation of these materials.

13b. The FY 2020 Budget in Brief indicated that the FY2020 budget will include $1 million for the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability within the Office of the Attorney General.

60 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

The purpose of the additional funding is to investigate wrongful convictions and civil rights violations involving law enforcement, to conduct internal affairs investigations and prosecute criminal abuses of the public’s trust by public officials.

• Question: Please provide an overview of how these funds will be expended in FY2020. Please detail any additional positions that will be funded from this appropriation. Does the addition of funding reverse an erosion of resources that occurred in recent years or comprise a real increase in department resources directed to public sector criminal activity? Will internal affairs investigations be assumed by the Office of the Attorney General from local law enforcement agencies and/or county prosecutors? Is the effort targeted exclusively to the conduct of law enforcement officials, or will also encompass corrupt activity by other public officials?

Over the past year, the Attorney General’s Office has not only worked to root out the corruption and misconduct that breeds distrust in government, but has also tackled systemic issues designed to strengthen confidence in New Jersey’s system of justice.

As stated in response to Question 13(a), in September 2018, Attorney General Grewal announced the creation of a new unit to combat corruption and strengthen confidence in government institutions. To lead the effort, Attorney General Grewal recruited a longtime federal prosecutor who has led complex corruption investigations and obtained convictions against numerous public officials, including multiple Members of Congress. The new unit – the Office of Public Integrity & Accountability (OPIA) – includes both detectives and prosecutors and reports directly to the Attorney General.

OPIA will investigate and prosecute criminal abuses of the public trust and handle other sensitive matters that implicate the public’s confidence in the criminal justice system. OPIA’s mandate is not limited to the investigation of conduct by law enforcement officials.

In Spring 2018, the Passaic County Prosecutor’s Office announced that it would not seek the retrial of two men who had been convicted of murder in 1996 but whose convictions were vacated in 2017 following the discovery of exculpatory evidence. In response, Attorney General Grewal convened a panel, led by former New Jersey Supreme Court Justice Virginia Long and former U.S. Attorney Paul Fishman, to provide recommendations to the Attorney General’s Office about establishing two new statewide units: a “cold case unit,” which would attempt to solve old crimes using new technology, and a “conviction review unit,” which would review claims of actual innocence by those convicted of serious crimes.

61 Department of Law and Public Safety FY 2019-2020

Discussion Points (Cont’d)

While OPIA handles the internal affairs for the Department of Law and Public Safety, it will not assume those duties handled by local law enforcement agencies and county prosecutors. Local law enforcement agencies and county prosecutors will continue to operate pursuant to the Attorney General’s Internal Affairs Policy and Procedures.

62 Grant to Encourage Arrest Policy, Victim Centered Law Enforcement Training F FY 2015 Recipient Name Amount NJ Coalition Against Sexual Assault $111,726 NJ Coalition to End Domestic Violence $111,726 Beyond Diversity $111 726

Grant received in FFY 2015 has been extended until 09/30/2019. No additional funds received in FFY 2016-2018 SORNA issued through DSP

Subgrants are not issued within this grant Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) FFY 2015 FFY 2016 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount V-01-15 Atlantic County $368,941 V-02-16 Womanspace $150,000 V-02-15 Bergen County $210,427 V-03-16 Avanzar $950,000 V-03-15 Burlington County $238,706 V-04-16 Atlantic County $622,947 V-04-15 Camden County $420,657 V-05-16 Bergen County $367,884 V-OS-15 Cape May County $266,343 V-06-16 Burlington County $556,355 V-06-15 Cumberland County $210,626 V-07-16 Camden County $805,704 V-08-15 Gloucester County $219,715 V-08-16 Cape May County $330,976 V-10-15 Hunterdon County $104,109 V-09-16 Cumberland County $443 786 V-11-15 Mercer County $240,116 V-10-16 Essex County $1 173,305 V-12-15 Middlesex County $402,654 V-11-16 Gloucester County $403,946 V-14-15 Morris County $188,400 V-12-16 Hudson County $654 505 V-15-15 Ocean County $398,399 V-13-16 Hunterdon County $229,531 V-16-15 Passaic County $352,758 V-14-16 Mercer County $538,883 V-18-15 Somerset County $148,842 V-16-16 Middlesex County $569,443 V-19-15 Sussex County $127,676 V-16-16 Monmouth County $557,352 V-21-15 Warren County $187,840 V-17-16 Morris County $376,922 VS-23-15 Atlantic County SANE $93,262 V-18-16 Ocean County $622,433 VS-24-15 Bergen County SANE $86,149 V-19-16 Passaic County $540,848 VS-25-15 Burlington County SANE $88,749 V-20-16 Salem County $277 110 VS-26-15 Camden Count y SANE $112,611 V-21-16 Somerset County $305,554 VS-27-15 Cape May County SANE $54,696 V-22-16 Sussex County $282,007 VS-28-15 Cumberland County SANE $76,471 V-23-16 Union County $461,772 VS-29-15 Essex County SANE $111,524 V-24-16 Warren County $282,309 VS-30-15 Gloucester County SANE $87,832 V-66-16 DHS- Office of the Public Guardian $400,000 VS-31-15 Hudson County SANE $26,407 V-84-16 Rutgers Univeristy $2,048,680 VS-32-15 Hunterdon County SANE $72,000 V-94-16 DCJ- State Victim Witness Advocacy Program $800 000 VS-33-15 Mercer Count y SANE $90,520 VSAI-1-16 Drew University $89,654 VS-34-15 Middlesex County SANE $87,755 VSAI-2-16 Ramapo College of New Jersey $393,855 VS-35-15 Monmouth County SANE $97,239 VSAI-3-16 Rowan University $167,385 VS-36-15 Morris County SANE $72,000 VSAI-4-16 The College of New Jersey $207,272 VS-37-15 Ocean CountySANE $86,990 VS-65-16 DCJ- FNE STATE PAY PROJECT $1,300,000 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) FFY 2015 FFY 2016 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount

A Place for Us" Atlantic County Women's Center VS-38-15 Passaic County SANE $95,250 VAG-01-16 $204,155

~A Place for Us" Atlantic County Women's Center VS-39-15 Salem County SANE $71,820 VAG-02-16 $250,000 VS-40-15 Somerset County SANE $72,000 VAG-03-16 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. $300,000 VS-41-15 Sussex County SANE $62,000 VAG-04-16 180 Turning Lives Around, tnc. $300,000 VS-42-15 Union County SANE $92,114 VAG-05-16 A Partnership for Change (APFC) $225,158 VS-43-15 Warren County SANE $72,000 VAG-06-16 A Partnership for Change (APFC) $239,556 VS-44-15 Atlantic County Prosecutor's Office $143,866 VAG-07-16 Alternatives to Domestic Violence / BCDHS $150,000 VS-45-15 Bergen County Prosecutor's Office $140,557 VAG-08-16 American Friends Service Committee, Immigrant $216,654 VS-46-15 Burlington County Prosecutor's $142,721 VAG-09-16 Camden Center for Law and Social Justice $242,660 VS-47-15 Camden County Prosecutor's Office $163,660 VAG-10-16 Camden Center for Law and Social Justice $182,379 VS-48-15 Cape May County Prosecutor's $127,000 VAG-11-16 CarePoint Health Foundation, Inc. $214,587 VS-49-15 Cumberland County Prosecutor's $140,366 VAG-12-16 CASA of New Jersey, Inc. $228,864 VS-50-15 Essex County Prosecutor's Office $161,114 VAG-13-16 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton $299,258 VS-51-15 Gloucester County Prosecutor's $141,830 VAG-14-16 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton $300,000 VS-52-15 Hudson County Prosecutor's Office $155,768 VAG-15-16 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton, Providence $208,312 VS-53-15 Hunterdon County Prosecutor's $76,792 VAG-16-16 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton, Providence $254,100 VS-54-15 Mercer County Prosecutor's Office $150,867 VAG-17-16 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton, Providence $258,750 VS-55-15 Middlesex County Prosecutor's $141,384 VAG-18-16 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton, Providence $206,908 VS-56-15 Monmouth County Prosecutor's $145,521 VAG-19-16 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton, Providence $236,473 VS-57-15 Morris County Prosecutor's Office $127,000 VAG-20-16 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trenton, Providence $269,212 VS-58-15 Ocean County Prosecutor's Office $140,684 VAG-21-16 Center For Family Services, Inc. $300,000 VS-59-15 Passaic County Prosecutor's Office $148,894 VAG-22-16 Center For Family Services, Inc. $169,823 VS-60-15 Salem County Prosecutor's Office $127,000 VAG-23-16 Center For Family Services, Inc. $300,000 VS-61-15 Somerset County Prosecutor's $89,788 VAG-24-16 Center For Family Services, Inc. $300,000 VS-62-15 Sussex County Prosecutors Office $62,614 VAG-25-16 Center For Family Services, Inc. $300,000 VS-63-15 Union County Prosecutor's Office $115,705 VAG-26-16 Center For Family Services, Inc. $278,685 VS-64-15 Warren County Prosecutor's Office $127,000 VAG-27-16 Center for Great Expectations $219,000 VS-65-15 DCJ SANE State Pay Project $1,040,000 VAG-28-16 Center for Great Expectations $150,000 VCS-44-15 Atlantic County $385,867 VAG-29-16 Center for Hope and Safety, Inc. $300,000 VCS-45-15 Bergen County $97,284 VAG-30-16 Center for Hope and Safety, Inc. $299,999 VCS-46-15 Burlington County $156,487 VAG-31-16 Central Jersey Legal Services $300,000 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) F FY 2015 F FY 2016 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount VCS-47-15 Camden County $347,720 VAG-32-16 Coalition Against Rape and Abuse Inc. $300,000 VCS-48-15 Cape May County $398,334 VAG-33-16 Contact of Burlington County $97,500 Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) for VCS-49-15 Cumberland County $400,000 VAG-34-16 Children of Atlantic and Cape May Counties $300,000 Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) for VCS-50-15 Essex County $400,000 VAG-35-16 Children of Atlantic and Cape May Counties $300,000 Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) of VCS-51-15 Gloucester County $320,843 VAG-36-16 Union County $275,860 Court Appointed Special Advocates of Camden VCS-52-15 Hudson County $296,404 VAG-37-16 County, Inc. $229,923 Court Appointed Special Advocates of VCS-53-15 Hunterdon County $400,000 VAG-38-16 Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem Counties $250,754 Court Appointed Special Advocates of VCS-54-15 Mercer County $400,000 VAG-39-16 Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem Counties $242,127 Court Appointed Special Advocates of VCS-55-15 Middlesex County $400,000 VAG-40-16 Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem Counties $227,825 Court Appointed Special Advocates of Mercer VCS-56-15 Monmouth County $400,000 VAG-41-16 County, Inc. $300,000 Court appointed Special Advocates of Mercer VCS-57-15 Morris County $276,800 VAG-42-16 County, Inc. $300,000 Court Appointed Special Advocates of Monmouth VCS-58-15 Ocean County $189,151 VAG-43-16 County, Inc. $278,670 Court Appointed Special Advocates of Morris and VCS-59-15 Passaic County $400,000 VAG-44-16 Sussex Counties (CASA) $211 457 Court Appointed Special Advocates of Morris and VCS-60-15 Salem County $200,073 VAG-45-16 Sussex Counties (CASA) $137,255 Court Appointed Special Advocates of Ocean VCS-61-15 Somerset County $199,622 VAG-46-16 County $231,621 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) F FY 2015 FFY 2016 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Court Appointed Special Advocates of Somerset, VCS-62-15 Sussex County $400,000 VAG-47-16 Hunterdon and Warren Counties, NJ, Inc. $116,930 Court Appointed Special Advocates of Somerset, VCS-63-15 Union County $400,000 VAG-48-16 Hunterdon and Warren Counties $130,538 Court Appointed Special Advocates of Somerset, VCS-64-15 Warren County $400,000 VAG-49-16 Hunterdon and Warren Counties $158,237 DASI -Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault VHT-65-15 Atlantic County Women's Center $1,000, 000 VAG-50-16 Intervention Services $299,999 DASI -Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault V-66-15 DHS/Office of the Public Guardian $400,000 VAG-51-16 Intervention Services $300,000 V-67-15 Atlantic County $441,493 VAG-52-16 Deirdre O'Brien Child Advocacy Center, Inc. $299,540 Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault Crisis Center V-68-15 Bergen County $291,054 VAG-53-16 of Warren County $294,581 Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault Crisis Center V-69-15 Burlington County $377,850 VAG-54-16 of Warren County $275,023 V-70-15 Camden County $502,398 VAG-55-16 Essex County Family Justice Center $300,000 V-71-15 Cape May County $268,012 VAG-56-16 Essex County Family Justice Center $300,000 V-72-15 Cumberland County $343,186 VAG-57-16 Essex County LGBT RAIN Foundation, Inc. $299,600 V-73-15 Essex County $754,222 VAG-58-16 Essex-Newark Legal Services Project, Inc. $239,276 V-74-15 Gloucester County $329,562 VAG-59-16 Family Service League $144,617 V-75-15 Hudson County $522,012 VAG-60-16 Family Services Bureau of Newark $150,000 V-88-15 Hunterdon County $179,904 VAG-61-16 Family Services Bureau of Newark $165,000 V-89-15 Mercer County $396,527, VAG-62-16 Foundation for University Hospital $300,000 V-76-15 Middlesex County $373,003, VAG-63-16 FP YouthOutCry Foundation, Inc. $250,668 V-77-15 Monmouth County $385,028 VAG-64-16 Hetrick Martin Institute: New Jersey $300,000 V-78-15 Morris County $265,944 VAG-65-16 Hispanic Family Center of Southern NJ, Inc. $272,935 V-79-15 Ocean County $417,973 VAG-66-16 Hispanic Family Center of Southern NJ, Inc. $246,241 Hudson County Court Appointed Special V-80-15 Passaic County $407,809 VAG-67-16 Advocates (CASA) $293,908 V-81-15 Salem County $212,476 VAG-68-16 Ironbound Community Corporation $300,000 V-82-15 Somerset County $239,132 VAG-69-16 Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc. $278,938 V-83-15 Womanspace $150,000 VAG-70-16 Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc. $299,993 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) F FY 2015 FFY 2016 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Jewish Family Service &Children's Center of V-84-15 Rutgers-College Sexual Assault Initiat $2,500,000 VAG-71-16 Clifton-Passaic, Inc. $300,000 Jewish Family Service of NetroWest /Rachel V-85-15 Sussex County $203,363 VAG-72-16 Coalition $300,000 Jewish Family Service of NetroWest /Rachel V-86-15 Union County $382,391 VAG-73-16 Coalition $300,000 V-87-15 Warren County $206,661 VAG-74-16 La Casa de Don Pedro, Inc. $300,000 V-90-15 JJC $48,320 VAG-75-16 Legal Services of New Jersey $300,000 V-91-15 Hudson County $19,963 VAG-76-16 Legal Services of Northwest Jersey, Inc. $267,658 V-92-15 Salem County $61,126 VAG-77-16 Legal Services of Northwest Jersey, Inc. $300,000 V-93-15 Union County $98,544 VAG-78-16 Life Ties, Inc. $192,827 Long Beach Island Community Center, Inc. (LBICC, V-94-15 DCJ $240,000 VAG-79-16 Inc.) $71,720 DCJ FNE-15 DCJ SANE State Pay Project $1,337,624 VAG-80-16 Main St. Counseling Center $299,667 VAG-01-15 "A Place for Us" Atlantic County Won $110,000 VAG-81-16 Manavi, Inc. $300,000 VAG-02-15 "A Place for Us" Atlantic County Won $300,000 VAG-82-16 Mercy Center Corporation $300,000 VAG-03-15 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. $300,000 VAG-83-16 Middlesex County $130,000 National Center for Civic Innovation /Newark VAG-04-15 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. $300,000 VAG-84-16 Community Solutions $300,000 VAG-05-15 A Partnership for Change (APFC) $158,210 VAG-85-16 New Jersey Association on Correction $298,943 VAG-06-15 Alternatives to DV, Div of Bergen Co $180,354 ~, VAG-86-16 New Jersey Association on Correction $299,046 VAG-07-15 Bergen County Court Appointed Spec $110,000 VAG-87-16 New Jersey Association on Correction $185,021 VAG-08-15 CarePoint Health Foundation $183,886' VAG-88-16 New Jersey Crime Victims Law Center $147,302 VAG-09-15 CASA for Children of Essex County, In $220,000 VAG-89-16 Northeast New Jersey Legal Services $164,931 VAG-10-15 CASA of Camden County $105,382 VAG-90-16 Northeast New Jersey Legal Services $190,810 VAG-11-15 CASA of New Jersey $113,214 VAG-91-16 Northeast New Jersey Legal Services $282,859 VAG-12-15 Catholic Charities, Diocese of Trentor $255,250 VAG-92-16 Northeast New Jersey Legal Services $288,811 VAG-13-15 Catholic Charities, Providence House, $217,848 VAG-93-16 Partners for Women and Justice, Inc. $221,270 VAG-14-15 Catholic Charities, Providence House. $210,864 VAG-94-16 Partners for Women and Justice, Inc. $299,919 VAG-15-15 Catholic Charities, Providence House. $217,464 VAG-95-16 Partners for Women and Justice, tnc. $230,645 Passaic County Court Appointed Special Advocates VAG-16-15 Catholic Charities, Providence House. $210,632 ~VAG-96-16 (CASA) $300,000 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) FFY 2015 F FY 2016 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Passaic County Court Appointed Special Advocates VAG-17-15 Center for Family Services, Inc. $190,412 VAG-97-16 (CASA) $245,900 VAG-18-15 Center for Family Services, Inc. $189,600 VAG-98-16 Prevention Education, Inc. t/a PEI Kids $155,043 VAG-19-15 Center for Family Services, Inc. $203,026 VAG-99-16 Real House Recovery, Inc. $299,550 VAG-20-15 Center for Family Services, Inc. $184,220 VAG-100-16 Rutgers Law School $214,962 VAG-21-15 Center for Family Services, Inc. $129,310 VAG-101-16 Rutgers Law School $300,000 VAG-22-15 Center for Family Services, Inc. $181,124 VAG-102-16 Safe &Sound Somerset, Inc. $300,000 VAG-23-15 Center for Hope and Safety, Inc. $300,000 VAG-103-16 Safe &Sound Somerset, Inc. $300,000 VAG-24-15 Center for Hope and Safety, Inc. $167,408 VAG-104-16 Safe &Sound Somerset, Inc. $300,000 VAG-25-15 Central Jersey Legal Services $300,000 VAG-105-16 Safe &Sound Somerset, Inc. $300,000 VAG-26-15 Coalition Against Rape and Abuse, In $127,900 VAG-106-16 Safe &Sound Somerset, Inc. $300,000 VAG-27-15 Contact Burlington County $96,000 VAG-107-16 Salem County Women's Services $120,526 VAG-28-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates (~ $189, 218 VAG-108-16 Salem County Women's Services $103,696 VAG-29-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates (i $217,924 VAG-109-16 Salem County Women's Services $124,736 VAG-30-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates (~ $106,276 VAG-110-16 Servicios Latinos de Burlington County, Inc. $300,000 VAG-31-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates (~ $130,256 VAG-111-16 Seton Hall University School of Law $177,559 VAG-32-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates (~ $290,480 VAG-112-16 Volunteer Lawyers for Justice $300,000 VAG-33-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates c $300,000 VAG-113-16 Womanspace, Inc. $138,487 VAG-34-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates o $275,400 VAG-114-16 Womanspace, Inc. $300,000 VAG-35-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates a $146,710 VAG-115-16 Womanspace, Inc. $300,000 VAG-36-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates c $158,254] VAG-116-16 Women Aware, Inc. $300,000 VAG-37-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates o $131,396 1', VAG-117-16 Women Aware, Inc. $300,000 VAG-38-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates c $211,9061 VAG-118-16 Wynona's House Child Advocacy Center $300,000 VAG-39-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates o $101,128 1 VAG-119-16 YWCA Bergen County $110,872 VAG-40-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates c $105, 600 VAG-120-16 YWCA Bergen County $300,000 VAG-41-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates o $103,232 VAG-121-16 YWCA Eastern Union County $153,333 VAG-42-15 Court Appointed Special Advocates o $98,520 VAG-122-16 YWCA Eastern Union County $150,000 VAG-43-15 DASI: Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assa $300,000 VAG-123-16 YWCA Eastern Union County $140,000 VAG-44-15 Deirdre O'Brien Child Advocacy Cent $237,420 VAG-124-16 Zufall Health $99,309 VAG-45-15 Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault Cris $153,200 VAG-125-16 Bergen County CASA $300,000 Instruments of Righteousness Evangelistic $ 2 31, 744 VAG-46-15 Essex County Family Justice Center $300,000 VAG-126-16 Ministries, Inc. Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) FFY 2015 FFY 2016 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount VAG-47-15 Essex-Newark Legal Services $128,536 VAG-127-16 CASA for Children of Essex County, Inc. $300,000 VAG-48-15 Family Service Bureau of Newark $170,000 VAG-128-16 Independence: A Family of Services, Inc. $300,000

VAG-129-16 New Jersey Coalition to End Domestic Violence $234,000 VAG-49-15 Family Service Bureau of Newark $170,000

VAG-130-16 New Jersey Coalition to End Domestic Violence $300,000 VAG-50-15 Hispanic Family Center of Southern f~ $111,276 VAG-51-15 Hudson County Court Appointed Spe $116,414 VAG-131-16 Newark Community Street Team, Inc. $300,000 VAG-52-15 Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc $294,406 VAG-132-16 SAFE in Hunterdon $218,982 VAG-53-15 Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc $297,094 VAG-133-16 SAFE in Hunterdon $232,587 VAG-54-15 Jewish Family Service &Children's CE $300,000 VAG-134-16 Exhale Women's Fellowship $50,000 VAG-55-15 Jewish Family Service of MetroWest/ $296,440 VAG-135-16 WAFA House, Inc. $300,000 Sussex Children's Advocacy Center, Inc., Ginnie's VAG-136-16 $299,973 VAG-56-15 Jewish Family Service of MetroWest/ $287,228, House The Alcove Center for Grieving Children and VAG-139-16 $209,758 VAG-57-15 La Casa de Don Pedro, Inc. $300,000~~! Families VAG-58-15 Legal Services of New Jersey $300,000 VAG-140-16 Oasis-A Haven for Women and Children $79,986 VAG-59-15 Legal Services of Northwest Jersey $300,000 VAG-141-16 Protection from Abuse Security Services $62,711 VAG-60-15 Long Beach Island Community Cente $81,922 VN-1-16 V.I.N.E. $345,780 VAG-61-15 Manavi, Inc. $300,000 VAG-62-15 Mercy Center Corporation $300,000 VAG-63-15 National Center for Civic Innovation i $246,460 VAG-64-15 NJAOC Camden County Women's Cep $199,248 VAG-65-15 NJAOC Passaic County Women's Cen $209,454 VAG-66-15 New Jersey Coalition to End Domesti $228,110 VAG-67-15 New Jersey Crime Victims' Law CentE $120,120 VAG-68-15 Northeast New Jersey Legal Services $220,000 VAG-69-15 Northeast New Jersey Legal Services $220,000 VAG-70-15 Northeast New Jersey Legal Services $220,000 VAG-71-15 Partners for Women and Justice $228,764 VAG-72-15 Partners for Women and Justice $147,800 VAG-73-15 Partners for Women and Justice $249,766 VAG-74-15 Passaic County CASA for Children $300,000 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA Grant) FFY 2015 F FY 2016 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amn~~nt VAG-75-15 Prevention Education Inc. t/a PEI Kid' $138,448 VAG-76-15 Resource Center of Somerset, Inc. $300,000 VAG-77-15 Resource Center of Somerset, Inc. $300,000 VAG-78-15 Resource Center of Somerset, Inc. $300,000 VAG-79-15 Resource Center of Somerset, Inc. $300,000 VAG-80-15 Rutgers Law $300,000 VAG-81-15 Rutgers Law School $300,000 VAG-82-15 SAFE in Hunterdon, Inc. $236,000 VAG-83-15 Salem County Women's Services $126,240 VAG-84-15 Salem County Women's Services $106,000 VAG-85-15 Servicios Latinos de Burlington Couni $250,000 VAG-86-15 Sussex County Children's Advocacy C $265,348 VAG-87-15 The Camden Center for Law and Soci $255,124 VAG-88-15 The Camden Center for Law and Soci $246,624 VAG-89-15 Wafa House, Inc. $300,000 VAG-90-15 Womanspace, Inc. $300,000 VAG-91-15 Womanspace, Inc. $143,724'''. VAG-92-15 Womanspace, Inc. $300,000'. VAG-93-15 Women Aware $240,000 VAG-94-15 Wynona's House Child Advocacy Cen $300,000 VAG-95-15 YWCA Bergen County $298,670 VAG-96-15 YWCA Eastern Union County $244,988 VAG-97-15 YWCA Eastern Union County $242,788 VAG-98-15 YWCA Eastern Union County $229,772 VAG-99-15 Zufall Health Center, Inc. $84,450 VN-1-15 V.I.N.E $335,709 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) FFY 2015 FFY 2016 FFY 2017 SubQrant # Suberantee Name Amount Sub¢rant # Suberantee Name Amount Subsrant # Suberantee Name Amount V AWA-01-15 180 Turning Lives Around $45,000 VAWA-01-16 180 Turning Lives Around $45,000 VAWA-10-17 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. - OVRT $69,319 Bergen Co Alternatives to Domestic Violence - VAWA-02-15 180 Turning Lives Around $45,000 VAWA-02-16 180 Turning Lives Around $45,000 VAWA-12-17 DVRT $69,319 Catholic Charities Providence House -Burlington - VAWA-03-15 A Partnership for Change (APFC) $44,906 VAWA-03-16 A Partnership for Change (APFC) $44,906 VAWA-13-17 DVRT $69,319 Catholic Charities Providence House -Ocean - VAWA-04-15 Center For Family Services $45,000 VAWA-04-16 Center For Family Services $45,000 VAWA-14-17 DVRT $69,319 V Center AWA-05-15 For Family Services $45,000 VAWA-05-16 Center For Family Services $45,000 VAWA-15-17 Center For Family Services, Inc. - DVRT $69,319 VAWA-06-15 Center For Family Services $45,000 VAWA-06-16 Center For Family Services $45,000 VAWA-16-17 Center for Family Services, Inc. - DVRT $69,319 DASI -Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault DASI -Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault V Intervention AWA-07-15 Services $45.,000 VAWA-07-16 Intervention Services $45,000 VAWA-17-17 Coalition Against Rape and Abuse, Inc. - OVRT $69,319 Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault Crisis Center of V AWA-08-15 Essex County Family Justice Center $45,000 VAWA-O8-16 Essex County Family Justice Center $45,000 VAWA-18-17 Warren Co. - DVRT $69,319

V AWA-09-15 Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-09-16 Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-20-17 New Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc. - DVRT $69,319 New Jersey Association on Correction (CCWC) - VAWA-10-15 Salem County Women's Services $45,000 VAWA-10-16 Salem County Women's Services $45,000 VAWA-21-17 DVRT $69,319 New Jersey Association on Correction (PCWC) - VAWA-11-15 St. Francis Community Center (LBICC, Inc.) $45,000 VAWA-11-16 St. Francis Community Center (LBICC, Inc.) $45,000 VAWA-22-17 DVRT $69,319 VAWA-12-15 Womanspace, Inc. $33,956 VAWA-12-16 Womanspace, Inc. $5,155 VAWA-23-17 Safe and Sound Somerset, Inc. - DVRT $69,319

VAWA-14-15 "A Place for Us" Atlantic County Women's Center $45,000 VAWA-14-16 "A Place for Us" Atlantic County Women's Center $45,000 VAWA-25-17 Salem Co. Women's Services - DVRT $69,319 VAWA-15-15 A Partnership for Change (APFC) $44,268 VAWA-15-16 A Partnership for Change (APFC) $44,268 VAWA-27-17 Womanspace, Inc. - DVRT $69,319 VAWA-16-15 Center For Family Services $45,000 VAWA-16-16 Center For Family Services $45,000 VAWA-28-17 Women Aware, Inc. - DVRT $69,319 VAWA-17-15 Manavi, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-17-16 Manavi, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-29-17 WomenRising - DVRT $69,319 Hispanic Family Center of Southern New Jersey, Hispanic Family Center of Southern New Jersey, VAWA-18-15 Inc. $45,000 VAWA-18-16 Inc. $45,000 VAWA-32-17 Bergen $41,450 New Jersey Association on Correction/Camden New Jersey Association on Correction/Camden VAWA-19-15 County Women's Center $45,000 VAWA-19-16 County Women's Center $45,000 VAWA-38-17 Gloucester $41,450 New Jersey Association on Correction/Passaic New Jersey Association on Correction/Passaic VAWA-20-15 County Women's Center $45,000 VAWA-20-16 County Women's Center $45,000 VAWA-41-17 Mercer $41,450 VAWA-21-15 Servicios Latinos de Burlington County, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-21-16 Servicios Latinos de Burlington County, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-43-17 Monmouth $41,450 VAWA-22-15 Wafa House, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-22-16 Wafa House, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-46-17 Passaic $41,450 VAWA-23-15 Women Aware $45,000 VAWA-23-16 Women Aware $45,000 VAWA-49-17 Sussex $41,450 VAWA-31-15 Atlantic County $46,172 VAWA-24-16 YWCA Eastern Union County $45,000 VAWA-50-17 Union $41,448 VAWA-32-15 Burlington $25,715 VAWA-25-16 YWCA Eastern Union County $45,000 VAWA-52-17 180 Turning Lives Around, Inc. $45,000 A Partnership for Change (APFC) -Dating Abuse VAWA-33-15 Camden $56,230 VAWA-31-16 SAFE in Hunterdon $69,319 VAWA-53-17 Training Assistance $29,148 A Partnership for Change (APFC) -Police Response VAWA-34-15 Cape May $16,187 VAWA-32-16 Womanspace, Inc.(SPLIT WITH 2015 VAWA) $3,613 VAWA-54-17 Enhanc Program $45,000 VAWA-35-15 Cumberland $21,304 VAWA-33-16 Women Aware, Inc. $69,319 VAWA-55-17 Camden Center for Law and Social Justice $45,000 Catholic Charities, Providence House DV Services, VAWA-36-15 Essex $101,460 VAWA-34-16 180, Turning Lives Around, Inc. $69,319 VAWA-56-17 Burlington County $45,000 Catholic Charities, Providence House DV Services, VAWA-37-15 Gloucester $22,732 VAWA-35-16 Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc. $69,319 VAWA-57-17 Ocean County $45,000 VAWA-38-15 Hudson (WomenRising, Inc.) $63,985 VAWA-36-16 Catholic Charities -Ocean $69,319 VAWA-58-17 Center for Family Services, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-39-15 Hunterdon (Safe in Hunterdon) $4,572 VAWA-37-16 New Jersey Association on Correction (PCWC) $69,319 VAWA-59-17 Center for Family Services, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-40-15 Mercer $25,936 VAWA-38-16 Salem County Women's Services $69,319 VAWA-60-17 Center for Family Services, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-41-15 Middlesex $35,623 VAWA-39-16 Resource Center of Somerset, Inc. $69,319 VAWA-61-17 Central Jersey Legal Services $45,000 Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault Intervention VAWA-42-15 Monmouth $39,216 VAWA-40-16 Services $69,319 VAWA-62-17 County of Middlesex $45,000 Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault Crisis Center VAWA-43-15 Morris $20,790 VAWA-41-16 YWCA of Eastern Union County $69,319 VAWA-63-17 of Warren County $45,000 Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault Crisis Center of VAWA-44-15 Ocean $45,152 VAWA-42-16 Warren County, Inc. $69,319 VAWA-64-17 Jersey Battered Women's Service, Inc. $45,000 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) FFY 2015 FFY 2016 FFY 2017 Suberant # Sub¢rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Subsrantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount VAWA-45-15 Passaic $32,572 VAWA-43-16 Atlantic County $65,351 VAWA-65-17 Long Beach Island Community Center, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-46-15 Salem (Salem Co Women's Center) $9,687 VAWA-44-16 Burlington $68,561 VAWA-66-17 New Jersey Association on Correction $45,000 VAWA-47-15 Somerset (Resource Center of Somerset) $11,599 VAWA-45-16 Camden $57,852 VAWA-67-17 SAFE in Hunterdon $45,000 VAWA-48-15 Sussex $7,483 VAWA-48-16 Essex $97,472 VAWA-68-17 Womanspace, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-49-15 Union $28,136 VAWA-49-16 Gloucester $23,563 VAWA-69-17 Women Aware $45,000 VAWA-50-15 Warren -split between FFY13 and FFY14 $7,944 VAWA-49-16b Gloucester $23,563 VAWA-70-17 Wynona's House, Inc. $45,000 VAWA-51-15 Atlantic County Women's Center $22,137 VAWA-50-16 Hudson (WomenRising, Inc.) $61,072 VAWA-71-17 YWCA Eastern Union County $45,000 VAWA-52-15 YWCA/ Bergen County Rape Crisis Center $20,264 VAWA-51-16 Hunterdon (Safe in Hunterdon) $4,909 VAWA-72-17 NICASA - SA Training Institute $67,500 VAWA-53-15 CONTACT of Burlington County $21,081 VAWA-52-16 Mercer $35,304 VAWA-73-17 NICASA -Update CSVA Manual $86,611 VAWA-54-15 Center for Family Services-Camden $27,860 VAWA-52-16b Mercer $35,304 VAWA-74-17 Prevention Campaign - NJCEDV $86,611 VAWA-55-15 Coalition Against Rape and Abuse-Cape May $18,594 VAWA-53-16 Middlesex $36,610 VAWA-75-17 Association of Office of the Courts $175,000 VAWA-56-15 Center for Family Services-Cumberland $20,332 VAWA-54-16 Monmouth $35,742 VAWA-57-15 Family Service League-Essex $26,940 VAWA-55-16 Morris $19,034 VAWA-58-15 Center for Family Services-Gloucester $20,604 VAWA-56-16 Ocean $43,992 VAWA-59-15 CarePoint Health Foundation (Christ Hospital- $25,987 VAWA-57-16 Passaic $35,290 VAWA-60-15 Safe in Hunterdon, Inc. $16,891 VAWA-58-16 Salem (Salem Co Women's Center) $10,257 VAWA-61-15 Womanspace, Inc.-Mercer $22,819 VAWA-59-16 Somerset (Resource Center of Somerset) $13,191 VAWA-62-15 Middlesex County Public Health Dept. $20,332 VAWA-60-16 Sussex $7,693 VAWA-63-15 180, Turning Lives Around, Inc.-Monmouth $20,332 VAWA-61-16 Union $28,342 VAWA-64-15 Morris County Sexual Assault Center/AHS Hospital $18,799 VAWA-63-16 Atlantic County Women's Center $22,913 VAWA-65-15 Long Beach Island Community Center-Ocean $20,298 VAWA-64-16 YWCA/ Bergen County Rape Crisis Center $22,101 VAWA-66-15 New Jersey Association on Corrections -Passaic $22,921 VAWA-65-16 CONTACT of Burlington County $23,116 VAWA-67-15 Salem County Women's Center $16,3801 VAWA-66-16 Center for Family Services-Camden $30,901 Zufall Health Center/Women's Health & VAWA-68-15 Counseling Ctr-Somerset $17,232' VAWA-67-16 Coalition Against Rape and Abuse-Cape May $20,476 Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault Intervention- VAWA-69-15 Sussex $17,300 VAWA-68-16 Center for Family Services-Cumberland $22,338 VAWA-70-15 Union County Rape Crisis Center $21,933 VAWA-69-16 Family Service League-Essex $30,122 Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault Crisis Center- VAWA-71-15 Warren $16,993 VAWA-70-16 Center for Family Services-Gloucester $22,812 CarePoint Health Foundation (Christ Hospital- VAWA-72-15 NJCASA $90,000 VAWA-71-16 Hudson) $28,735

VAWA-73-15 AOC $157,914 VAWA-72-16 Safe in Hunterdon, Inc. $18,581

VAWA-74-15 DSP $100,000 VAWA-73-16 Womanspace, Inc.-Mercer $26,873

VAWA-75-15 Atlantic County Women's Center $69,319 VAWA-74-16 Middlesex County Public Health Dept. $22,778

VAWA-76-15 Bergen County Alternatives to Domestic Violence $69,319 VAWA-75-16 180, Turning Lives Around, Inc.-Monmouth $26,839

VAWA-77-15 Catholic Charities Providence House -Burlington $69,319 VAWA-77-16 Long Beach Island Community Center-Ocean $22,643 New Jersey Association on Corrections -Passaic VAWA-78-15 New Jersey Association on Correction (CCWC) $69,319 VAWA-78-16 Co Wom Ctr $25,926

VAWA-79-15 Coalition Against Rape and Abuse, Inc. $69,319 VAWA-79-16 Salem County Women's Center $18,243 Zufall Health Center/Women's Health & VAWA-80-15 Center for Family Services, Inc. $69,319 VAWA-80-16 Counseling Ctr-Somerset $19,427 Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault Intervention- VAWA-81-15 The Safe House $69,319 VAWA-81-16 Sussex $19,055

VAWA-82-15 Center for Family Services $69,319 VAWA-82-16 Union County Rape Crisis Center $23,083 Domestic Abuse &Sexual Assault Crisis Center- VAWA-83-15 WomenRising $69,319 VAWA-83-16 Warren $18,852 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) FFY 2015 FFY 2016 FFY 2017 Subarant # Subzrentee Name Amount Sub¢rant # Suberantee Name Amount Sub¢rant # Suberantee Name Amount

VAWA-84-15 SAFE in Hunterdon $65,706 VAWA-84-16 State Police $100,000

VAWA-85-15 DOC $76,000 VAWA-85-16 N1 OFFICE OF THE COURTS $173,222

VAWA-86-16 DOC- EDNA MAHON $76,000

VAWA-87-16 N1 COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT $90,000

VAWA-88-16 DHS $89,872 Victims of Crime Act Training Grant FFY 2015 FFY 2016 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name n .,,.,...,+ VT-1-15 Rutgers University $150,000 VT-2-15 Harambe Social Services X87,017 Grant not received in FFY2016 VT-3-15 Beyond Diversity Resource Center ;>68,108 New Jersey Coalition to End VT-4-15 Domestic Violence $104,903 CASA of Cumberland, Gloucester, & VT-5-15 Salem $25,600 Wynona's House Training Summit VT-6-15 for Crime Victim Service $43,926 VT-7-15 Bergen County CASA $22,430 VT-8-15 Rutgers University $167,629

F FY 2017 FFY 2018 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount

Grant not received in FFY2017 ~ ~Subgrants not issued to date SORNA issued through DCJ FFY 2015 FFY 2016 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount SORNA-1-15 Division of State Police $215,923 SORNA-1-16 Division of State Police $222,826

FFY 2017 Sub~rant # Sub~rantee Name Amount Funds not received for FFY2018 & FFY2019 SORNA-1-17 Division of State Police $222,790 VOCA Building State Technology Grant

This grant was first received in FFY18. no subgrants will be issued, as this grant is being used within VCCO to enhance the Claims Processing System being used. Victims Compensation Award

Subgrants are not issued within the Victims Compensation Award. All funds received are utilized to process claims and payments to victims of crime. 2O ~ S OUTREACH TRAININGS &EVENTS

TRAINING TRAINING DATE Time ORGANIZATION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED VCCO STAFF LOCATION TYPE STATUS Wednesday Newark 1 1/24/18 2pm University Hospital Leena Mukalel Kathy Yuill Essex County Training Completed Wednesday 5:30pm- Trenton Mercer 2 3/14/18 6:30pm Millhill Child &Family Development Ganae Brandon, Ed.S Dalisha Carmichael County Training Completed Thursday 12:30pm - Parsippany 3 3/15/18 3:15pm New Jersey Victim Assistance Academy Carole O'Brien Kathy Yuill Essex County Training Completed Friday 12:30pm Sarah Bear, Community Lawrenceville 4 3/23/18 or fpm NJ Coalition Against Sexual Assault Engagement Specialist Kathy Yuill Mercer County Training Completed Thursday 10:OOam - Bridgeton Cumberland 5 4/5/18 12:OOpm CLE -Victims' Rights &Services of NJ Director Little County Training Completed Tuesday 11:OOam - Angelo J. Onorfi Mercer County Director Little, Doug Brooks, Dalisha Trenton 6 4/10/18 2:OOpm Mercer County Prosecutor - CVRW Prosecutor's Office Carmichael Mercer County Table Display Completed Wednesday 10:30am- ARL, LL, RP, LA, MV, DB, DC, MH, CDF, Trenton Mercer Host, Speaker, 7 4/11/18 12pm VCCO & SOVWA CVRW Event VCCO & SOVWA TF, MEB , KY, JM, KT, JD, RG County Table display, plus Completed Wednesday Mercy Center, Greater Asbury Park 8 4/11/18 6:30pm-8pm Mercy Center - CVRW Asbury Park Comm Dev Leana Allen Monmouth County Attendee Completed Director Little, Jason Delpeche, Maggie Thursday 2:30pm- County Prosecutors Assoc. County Prosecutors Assoc. Miranda, Michelle Williams, Audi Montclair 9 4/12/18 4:30pm NJ Assoc V/W Coord - CVRW NJ Assoc V/W Coord Acevedo Essex County Attendee Completed Thursday Kathy Yuill, Craig DiFiore, Union 10 4/12/18 Sam-4pm Union County Prosecutor's Office - CVRW Maria Reynolds Melissa Verardi, TC, RG, KT Union County Table Display Completed Friday Sayreville Middlesex 11 4/13/18 2pm-4pm Middlesex, Somerset & Hunterdon V/W - CVRW D. Johnson, D. McGowan, H. Hoff Michael Habib, Elizabeth L, TO County Attendee Completed

Friday 10am - County Prosecutors Assoc. County Prosecutors Assoc, NJ West Long Branch 12 4/13/18 12 pm NJ Assoc V/W Coord - CVRW Assoc V/W Coord Leana Allen, Mary Ellen Bonsper Monmouth County Attendee Completed Tuesday 10:OOam- Newark Community 13 4/17/18 3:OOpm Newark Community Street Team Street Team AAG Lester Essex County Participating Completed

Page 1 of 6 Saturday 11:00 - City of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka & Elizabeth Lucano Newark 14 4/21/18 4:OOpm The Newark Municipal Council Flyer Information Tabitha Otero Essex County Table Display Completed Sunday Passaic County Paterson Passaic 15 4/29/18 3pm-5pm Passaic County Prosecutor Camelia Valdes - CVRW Prosecutor's Office Tobi Footman County Attendee Completed Thursday Contact Person: Tinton Falls Monmouth 16 5/3/18 10am New Jersey Police Chief's Association Alexandra DeLeon Director Little County Training Completed Thursday Newark 17 5/3/18 7:15pm Essex County Prosecutor's Office Pamela McCauley Ken Thomas Essex County Training Completed Tuesday The Safe House Delrina Johnson Belleville 18 5/8/18 10am Clara Maass Medical Center Program Coordinator Michelle Williams Essex County Training Completed

Shiloh Community Fellowship Ministries and Saturday 11:OOam - Greater Asbury Park Community Development Asbury Park Cancelled due n/a 5/19/18 4:OOpm Initiative -Youth Community Health Day Jackie Burgess Leana Allen Monmouth County Table Display to weather Wednesday 9:OOam - Sewell 19 5/23/18 12:OOpm Rowan College At Gloucester County Denise Rosen Deputy Director Lester Gloucester County Speaker Completed Shiloh Community Fellowship Ministries and Saturday 11:OOam - Greater Asbury Park Community Development Asbury Park 20 6/2/18 4:OOpm Initiative -Youth Community Health Day Jackie Burgess Leana Allen Monmouth County Table Display Completed Tuesday 1:OOpm - Jackson 21 6/5/18 3:OOpm fVew Jersey Victim Assistance Academy Carole O'Brien Kathy Yuill Ocean County Training Completed Wednesday 5:30pm - Trenton Mercer 22 6/13/18 7:30pm Millhill Child &Family Development Ganae Brandon, Ed.S Dalisha Carmichael County Training Completed Wednesday 9:OOam - NJADVP/NJCEDV Annual Domestic Violence Piscataway 23 6/13/18 3:OOpm Conference Lynda Carson Michael Habib Middlesex County Table Display Completed Thursday Somerville 24 6/14/18 2:30pm Somerset County Prosecutors Debbie McGowan Director Little Somerset County Training Completed Friday 10:OOam - World Elder Abuse Awareness Trenton Presentation & 25 6/15/18 12:OOpm RJ Hughes Justice Complex -Atrium Trenton, NJ Nina Bonner Deputy Director Lester/Trenton Staff Mercer County Table Display Completed

Saturday 12:OOpm - 2018 Family PRIDE Sergio Granado, Chairman Elizabeth Lucano Rahway 26 6/16/18 S:OOpm CommuUNITY Picnic Danni Newbury, Coordinator Tabitha Otero Union County Table Display Completed Saturday Precious Little Ladies, Inc.- East Orange Representing 27 6/16/18 10am - 4pm Family Empowerment Fair Aziza Kibibi Michelle Williams Essex County VCCO Completed

Page 2 of 6 Friday 10:OOam - Forest Hill Healthcare Center Michelle Williams Newark 28 6/22/18 1:OOpm Annual Luau Health Fair Norma Herrera Maggie Miranda Essex County Table Display Completed Saturday 10:OOam - Red Bank 2g 6/23/318 1:OOpm Fifth Annual Red Bank Community Wellness Fair Ellen McCarthy Leana Allen Monmouth County Table Display Completed Thursday Freehold 30 7/12/18 10:OOam Monmouth County Child Advocacy Ctr. Debbie M. Riveros Kathy Yuill Monmouth County Training Completed Wednesday 6:30pm- Middlesex County Center East Brunswick n/a 7/18/18 7:30pm for Empowerment Samantha Dooley Kathy Yuill Middlesex County Training Cancelled Thursday Rahway National Night Out &Rahway Mayor's Rahway 31 8/2/2018 5:30pm-8pm Concert Series Detective William Eicholz Elizabeth Lucano, Tabitha Otero Union County Table Display Completed Monday Montclair Essex 32 8/6/18 11am Bright Hope Baptist Church Jane Allen Michelle Williams County Training Completed Tuesday Lieutenant Robert Henningsen, Jason Delpeche, Kathy Yuill, Craig Newark 33 8/7/18 2pm-8pm National Night Out -West Side Park Newark PD DiFiore, Ken Thomas Essex County Table Display Completed Tuesday Asbury Park 34 8/7/18 5pm National Night Out - Springwood Park Officer Baldwin, Asbury Park PD Leana Allen Monmouth County Table Display Completed

Tuesday Det. Sgt. Michael Palmerezzi, Maplewood Essex 35 8/7/18 6pm-9pm National Night Out - DeHart Park Maplewood PD Jason Delpeche County Table Display Completed Tuesday National Night Out -Raymond Wood Bauer Linden 36 8/7/18 5pm-7pm Promenade Det. Nolasco, Linden PD Elizabeth Lucano, Tabitha Otero Union County Table Display Completed Saturday Mayor Derek Armstead Linden Cancelled & n/a 8/11/18 12pm-9pm The Blancke St. & 8th Ward Community Day City of Linden Elizabeth Lucano, Zuanette Cabrera Union County Table Display Rescheduled 10:30 Saturday check-in Eduardo Baez, Jersey City Jersey City 37 8/25/18 fpm-9pm Jersey City LGBT Pride Festival LGBT Pride Festival Michelle Williams &Jackie Sierchio Hudson County Table Display Completed

Saturday 10:OOam - Burlington 38 9/8/18 12:OOpm Tabernacle Baptist Church Lisa Harris-Hall Michael Habib Burlington County Training Completed Saturday Irvington 39 9/8/18 11am - 5pm Annual Family Life Community Day Jason Delpeche Essex County Table Display Completed Craig DiFiore Tuesday Ramona Peterson Jersey City Organizers and 40 9/11/18 Sam-2pm 9/11 Memorial Service Event 9/11 Memorial Committee Jeff Zuber Hudson County &NYC attendee's Completed

Page 3 of 6 Saturday Mayor Derek Armstead Elizabeth Lucano, Linden 41 9/15/18 12pm-9pm The Blancke St. & 8th Ward Community Day City of Linden Tabitha Otero Union County Table Display Completed Sunday South Orange Community South Orange 42 9/16/18 fpm - 6pm South Orange Play Day Relations Committee Jason Delpeche Essex County Table Display Completed Monday 9:30anm - Newark 43 9/17/18 10:45am New Jersey Victim Assistance Academy Carole O'Brien Kathy Yuill Essex County Training Completed

Tuesday PREP-Police Response Enchancement M. Williams, M. Miranda, T. Otero, M. Edison 44 9/18/18 10am-2pm Program -Teen Dating APFC- A Partnership for Change Maraviglia, J. Seircho & R. Peterson Middlesex County Attendees Completed

Friday 8:30am- Family Justice Center &Essex ME. Bonpser, R. Gill, J. Seircho, T. Newark 45 9/21/18 4:30pm Domestic Violence Summit County D/V Working Group Footman, M. Verardi Essex County Attendees Completed Sunday South Orange Community South Orange 46 9/23/18 2pm - 4pm South Orange Newcomers Day Relations Committee Jason Delpeche Essex County Table Display Completed

Thursday PREP-Police Response Enchancement Scotch Plains Union 47 9/27/18 10am-2pm Program -Teen Dating APFC- A Partnership for Change A. Acevedo & G. DeCicco County Attendees Completed Tuesday 1:30~rn - Hillsborough n/a 10/2/18 2:30PM Safe Sound Somerset Ana Mendez/Susan Rivera Pending Somerset County Training Cancelled Wednesday 11am- Military Park, Newark 48 10/3/18 3:30pm La Casa de Don Pedro- D/V Awareness event Roxana Herrera, D/V Advocate Elizabeth, Zuanette Cabrera Essex County Table Display Completed Councilman Anthony Talerico, Jr. Wolcott Park, Saturday & Eatontown 49 10/6/18 fpm-5pm Eatontown Community Day Councilwomen Jennifer Sherrod Leana Allen Monmouth County Table Display Completed Thursday Camden County Women's Center Blackwood 50 10/11/18 5:30pm Domestic Violence Outreach &Support Center Caitlin Butrica Michael Habib Camden County Attendee Completed statt didn't Thursday 6:30pm- Livingston attend b/c of n/a 10/11/18 7:30pm Rachel Coalition D/V Candlelight Vigil Rachel Coalition D. Quiles, G.A. DeCicco, M. Scarder Essex County Attendees weather Friday Cranford Attending & 51 10/12/18 fpm-4:30pm Union County Prosecutor's Office Maria Reynolds M. Verardi, K. Yuill, C. DiFiore Union County table display Completed Saturday 9:OOam - Newark 52 10/13/18 1:OOpm Colombian Consulate Luz Carreno T. Otero, Z. Cabrera Essex County Attending Completed

Page 4 of 6 Thursday 10am - Edison 53 10/18/18 11:15am Legal Services of New Jersey Monica Gural Kathy Yuill Middlesex County Training Completed Thursday S:OOpm - Candlelight Vigil Flemington Hunterdon 54 10/18/18 6:30pm Hunterdon County Justice Center SAFE in Hunterdon Michael Habib County Attending Completed Friday 10:30 - Trenton 55 10/19/18 Noon NJCEDV Christian Pleskov Louise Lester Mercer County Training Completed Saturday City of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka & Unidas En Una Newark Attending & 56 10/20/18 fpm-4:30pm Sola Voz (D/V awareness event) Maria Yllescas Maggie Miranda Essex County table display Completed Thursday 8:OOam - Domestic Violence Awareness Month Vineland 57 10/25/18 12:30pm Training Symposium Cumberland County College Deputy Director Lester Cumberland County Presenter Completed Saturday Mujeres AI Poder- 1st Annual Newark Attending & 58 10/27/18 12pm-3pm D/V Awareness Day Zamaria Espinoza Maggie Miranda Essex County table display Completed Monday The Jewish Museum of New Jersey NJ Attorney General & Veronica Newark 59 10/29/18 4pm Congregation Ahavas Sholom -Synagogue Allenda, DG Director Deputy Director Lester Essex County Attending Completed Thursday Eatontown Monmouth 60 11/1/18 10am Monmouth County Connections Lori Leana Allen County Table Display Completed Friday Paterson Passaic 61 11/2/18 2pm-4pm Passaic County Women's Center Diana Tadros Kathy Yuill County Training Completed Monday Behavioral Health Dept. Dover 62 11/5/18 10am - 12pm Zufall Health Center Maria Menzel, MSW, LSW Kathy Yuill Morris County Training Completed Thursday Community Health &Social Services Partnership Red Bank Attending 63 11/8/18 10am Series -Lunch Break Melia Owens Leana Allen Monmouth County Table Displace Completed Presenting & attending Tuesday Newark networking 64 11/13/18 12pm-2pm Colombian Consulate &The Safe House Monica Roldan Maggie Miranda Essex County meeting Completed Sunday 11:OOam - Atlantic City 65 11/18/18 1:OOp.m. N1 Victim Witness Coordinators Association Joan Nixon Deputy Director Lester Atlantic County Speaker Completed Thursday Community Health &Social Services Partnership Red Bank Attending 66 12/6/2018 10am Series -Lunch Break Melia Owens Leana Allen Monmouth County Table Displace Completed

Page 5 of 6 Thursday 10am- Rachel Coalition Livingston rescheduled n/a 12/13/18 11:30am Jewish Family Services Metro West Aliza Kaplan Kathy Yuill Essex County Training for 2019

67

Page 6 of 6 OUTSIDE COUNSEL 2018

Law Firm Matter Amount ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Environmental Protection $1,080.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Kerner, Bruce $4,395.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Shareefah Graham-Bennett $585.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commiaaion v. Stelian Rosu OAL Docket No.; MVH 15590-17 $636.48 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v. Brielle Yakaski OAL Docket No.: MVH 13486-17 $284.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v. Daniel W. Cluff, Jr. OAL Docket No.: MVH-4215-18 $291.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v. Henry Hoffler OAL Docket No.: MVH 15771-2017 $359.04 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v. William J. Owen OAL Docket No.: MVH 15770-2017 $727.96 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v.Daniel J. Todd OAL Docket No.: MVH 5543-18 $414.68 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v Mayo, John $145.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. Albert T. Ayala $810.76 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. Carocci, Eric $691.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. Gilberto Santiago $690.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. Nohemi Farfan $770.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. Rodriguez-Pazmino, Andrea E. $282.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. Vaneric Layton $460.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. Zefren, Avrohom Y $345.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Alson Alston vs. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al. Civil Action# 147-cv- $8,053.62 4508; CO-AG-17 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Bradley C. Peterson v. Administrator Christopher Holmes, et al $97,702.80 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Haynes, John Craig vs. Dr. Ihoma Nwachukwi, et al. $40.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD In Re Grievance of Ryan Atkinson $17,360.44 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Jackie Alexander, et al v. Detective Miguel Holguin, et al $121,190.76 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Marianito Ruiz v. Correctional Officer Jerry Stretch, et al $56,451.61 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD McKenna, Matthew D. v. Mignella, Anthony, et al. $120.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD NJHMFA - Carrino Plaza Apartments Project $41,311.49 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD NJT Insurance Coverage Issue in Tangia Price, et al. v. NJT $455.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Scott lonno vs. NJ Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-437-17 $38,985.08 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Tina Diamond-Ostasz vs. State of New Jersey Department of Education, et al. $1,719.12 Docket No.: BUR-L-682-17 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Victoria Williams-Faux vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1812-16 $2,115.56 Arseneault & Fassett, LLP Chatham Hoboken Terminal Rail Accident, 9/29/16; (Thomas Gallagher); Representation in $2,417.12 NTSB Inquiry IMO; Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Alternative Investments -General $1,968.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Alternative Investment -Pershing Square, L.P. $816.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Blackstone Core Plus Real Estate Opportunities (post- $672.00 closing) Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Blackstone Property Partners (post-closing matters) $5,856.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Blackstone Resources Select Fund $1,152.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Blackstone Tac Opps Residential Opportunities (post- $20,118.00 closing matters) Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Centerbridge Credit Partners, LP (post-closing matters) $6,480.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Complex Transaction - Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals Corp. $2,469.00 Note Exchange Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Crayhill Capital Management LP Separate Account (post- $8,208.00 closing transaction) Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Dyal Capital Partners III, LP (post-closing matters) $17,232.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Dyal NJ Investors, LP (2014 Allocation) (post-closing $2,784.00 matters) Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Federal Securities -Determination of $24,528.00

Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Federal Securities Law Matters -Filing and Compliance $1,968.00 Advice Baker Botts L: L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Iguazu Partners, LP (post-closing) $7,857.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Jana Strategic Investment Fund $2,208.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston. Division of Investment - NJ/HitecVision Co-Investment Vehicle (post-closing) $22,656.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Owl Rock Capital Holdings, LLC (post-closing matters) $2,784.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Owl Rock Co-Investment Vehicle (post-closing matter) $336.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - OZ Domestic Partners II, Ltd (post-closing) $3,648.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - OZNJ private Opportunities, LP (post-closing) $8,496.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - OZNJ Real Asset Opportunities, LP (post-closing) $288.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - OZNJ Real Estate Opportunities, LP (post-closing) $10,656.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - OZSC II, LP (post-closing) $288.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - OZSC, LP (post-closing) $1,392.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - RC Woodley Park, LP (post-closing matters) $14,160.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Regiment Capital Ltd Fund $576.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - TCW Direct Lending, LLC (post-closing) $5,088.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Vista Equity Partners Fund VI, LP (post-closing matters) $12,084.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Vista Foundation Fund II, LP $864.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Vista Foundation Fund III, LP (post-closing matters) $11,907.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Vista Platform Co-Investment Vehicle (initial transaction) $51,471.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Welsh, Carson, Anderson &Stowe XI, LP $4,944.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Alternative Investment -Sycamore Partners III, L.P. DOL # $68,673.00 17-64335 (initial transaction) Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Alternative Investment -Sycamore Partners III, L.P. DOL # $1,152.00 17-64336 (post-closing matters) Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment DOI) -Alternative Investment - MBK IV, L.P. $1,344.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston DOI -Alternative Investment -Neuberger Berman New Jersey Custom Fund III, L.P. $63,840.00 (initial transaction) Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston DOI -Alternative Investment - Och-Ziff Real Estate Credit Fund -Post Closing $10,080.00 Matters Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Investments in Winton Futures Fund, Ltd. $1,440.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Protege Partners $2,112.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Separate Account Managed by Dyal Capital Partners (Related to Dyal Capital $39,840.00 Partners III) (initial transaction) Ballard Spahr LLP - Baltimore New Jersey Investigators Association, Lodge 174 (Collective Negotiations fora $215.00 Successor Agreement) Ballard Spahr LLP -Baltimore New Jersey Law Enforcement Supervisors Association (Collective Negotiations fora $2,780.00 Successor Agreement) Ballard Spahr LLP -Baltimore New Jersey Superior Officers Law Enforcement Unit (Collective Negotiations fora $82.42 Successor Agreement) Ballard Spahr LLP -Baltimore State Police Captains Labor Negotiations - STFA $12,267.50 Ballard Spahr LLP -Baltimore State Troopers Fraternal Association, et al. v. State of New Jersey, et al. $17,471.24 Ballard Spahr LLP -Baltimore Toolen, William, et al. v. State of New Jersey $11,909.00 Birchmeier and Powell LLC Tuckahoe Motor Vehicles Commission v. Joseph Tiedeman $1,425.00 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Apryl Anis v. State of New Jersey, Department of Human Services, et al $166,045.15 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont David Zeiss vs. State of New Jersey, Department of Community Affairs, Division of $131,106.00 Fire &Safety, Glenn Smyth, in his official and individual capacity Docket No.: CPM- L-545-14 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Diane Scott, Phillip Dowdell and Denise Hollingsworth vs. State of New Jersey, et $111,989.65 al. Docket No.: ESX-L-3425-17 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Gary DeMarzo and Samuel Lashman vs. Cape May County Prosecutor, et al. Docket $43,225.39 No.: CPM-L-129-13 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont LaMonica R. Cross vs. State of New Jersey, Office of Attorney General, Division of $17,431.14 Criminal Justice, et al. Docket No.: CAM-L-242-18 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Micaela P. Bennett vs. State of New Jersey, Elizabeth Connolly, Dawn Hall Apgar, $68,380.95 Lynn Kovich, Christina Mongon, Lisa Gaston and Theresa McQuaide Docket No.: MER-L-1774-15 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Michelle Barker vs. The State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1133-16 $18,014.05 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Onslo Rose v. Rowan University and John Does 1-5 and 6-10 $7,978.66 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Onslo Rose vs. Rowan University -APPEAL $8,896.00 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Susan Greco-Ericksen, Esq. $5,642.40 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Tara Kumor vs. ACRD Service Corporation, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1331-17 $45,007.37 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Tina Young vs. State of New Jersey Docket No.: CPM-L-83-17 $4,482.96 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Viktoriya Usachenok vs. State of New Jersey Department of the Treasury, et al. $35,179.25 Docket No.: MER-L-1577-17 Buonadonna &Benson, Vineland MVC v. Myrna Mercado $2,505.00 Buonadonna &Benson, Vineland MVC v. Respes, Illanah $6,063.93 Bursch Law PLLC, Caledonia IMO: Federal Monitoring of Federal Mandate; Charlie &Nadine H. v. Christopher $4,453.51 Christie, et al. CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Amalgamated Transit Union Local 823 v. NJ Transit Bus Co., Inv $22,180.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Amalgamated Transit Union, NJ State Joint Council v. NJ TRANSIT; Workers' $22,354.64 LAUREL Compensation Retroactive Claim Amalgamated Transit Union Local 823 v. NJ Transit Bus Co. CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Brooks, Darlene L. vs. Cynthia R.Kern„ et al. $23,574.83 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Colin Demonick v. Greystone Psychiatric Hospital $100.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Fuller, John vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al. $1,674.50 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Georandy Johnson v. Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital, et al $19,717.15 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Giardina v. Barilli $18,120.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Goldstein, Allen and Irene Goldstein vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $10,942.20 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Kirchheimer, Stefanie vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al. $10,598.50 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Mariano, Maria vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey $992.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Moore, Michael v. State of New Jersey $1,890.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Peterson, Bradley v. Administrator Christopher Holmes, et al. $26,488.72 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Shanahan, Kathleen v. NJT $107,340.02 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Smith, Charissa v. New Jersey Transit Corp, et al. $3,493.60 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Stopko, Keith vs. New Jersey Attoreny General, et al. $28,184.94 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Thurwanger, et al, Charles vs. Mary Brooks, et al. $16,241.00 LAUREL CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN Easement Acquisition -Berkeley Township $18,942.50 BRODY & AGNELLO Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown NJ TRANSIT -EMPLOYMENT COUNSEL HUMAN RESOURCES/POLICIES & $22,380.00 PROCEDURES Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown Tara Murphy, et al v. SONJ, et al $14,758.87 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, AFSCME New Jersey, et als v. City of Atlantic City, et als $61,269.24 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Atlantic City PBA Local 24, et al v. Governor Christopher Christie,et al $22,159.67 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, D.T. v. MCPO, et al $8,007.80 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Garrett Collick, et al v. William Paterson University, et al $57,753.56 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Healey, Robert, et al. v. State of New Jersey $24,674.70 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, In re: Gateway Development Corporation $1,960.00 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, International Association of Fire Fighters, et al v. City of Atlantic City, New Jersey, $137,029.20 West Orange et al Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, L.C. v. MCPO, et al $55,385.56 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Latimer, Jahmel J., et al. v. Kathleen Waldron, et al. (Wm Paterson Univ) $9,580.88 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Legal Services Re Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Chiesa) $492,385.60 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Legal Services Regarding Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Bond) $85,301.62 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Legal Services Regarding Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (City $25,891.96 West Orange Council/Agenda) Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Legal Services Regarding Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City $134,225.25 West Orange (Development/Real Estate) Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Legal Services Regarding Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Labor) $33,180.00 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Legal Services Regarding Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Municipal $30,250.96 West Orange Utility Authority) Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Liberty &Prosperity 1776, Inc. etals v. City of Atlantic City, et als $53,578.56 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, New Jersey Economic Development Authority -School Facilities Construction $600.00 West Orange Bonds -New Jersey Schools Development Authority Proposed Disposition of Camden Broadway Elementary School Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, New Jersey Economic Development Authority -School Facilities Construction Bonds $1,225.00 West Orange -New Jersey Schools Development Authority Proposed Disposition of Maher Charitable Foundation Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, New Jersey Economic Development Authority -School Facilities Construction Bonds $1,200.00 West Orange -New Jersey Schools Development Authority Proposed Disposition of Property in Trenton Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, NJEDA -Motor Vehicle Surcharges Revenue Refunding Bonds 2015 $123,495.67 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, NJEDA -School Facilities Construction Bonds -Fiscal Year 2018 New Money Bonds $37,840.13 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, NJEDA -School Facilities Construction Bonds - NJSDA Disposition of Surplus $1,350.00 West Orange Properties in East Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, NJEDA -School Facilities Construction Bonds, 2005 Series N Escrow Restructuring - $2,275.00 West Orange 2017 Closure of SLGS Window Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, NJEDA -School Facilities Construction Refunding Notes - FY 2018 $825.00 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, NJEDA -State Lease Revenue Bonds (Taxation &Health/Agriculture Buildings $99,496.58 West Orange Projects) Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Polo North Country Club, Inc. v. State of NJ, et al $5,348.00 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Litigation Against AC) (Chiesa) $306,448.12 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Stabilization and Recovery of Atlantic City (Pilot/Tax Appeals) (Chiesa) $277,753.78 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series Fiscal 2018 $41,134.42 West Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation -Refunding of Outstanding Tobacco $100,619.50 West Orange Settlement Asset -Backed Bonds 2018 Covington &Burling, Washington CMS Medicaid Disallowance Matters (Ctrs for Medicare &Medicaid Svsj $3,320.00 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Alba, Paul vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, et al. $1,443.12 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Alizadeh, Hamid vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and NJ Transit $8,590.54 Corp., et al. DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Althea Hylton-Lindsay v. William Paterson University, et al $29,526.75 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP ARC THE TUNNEL PROJECT -GENERAL $2,300.56 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Arpad, Seres vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $92,480.95 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Bojkiu, Serveta, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $11,053.76 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Boswell, Keith vs. Robert J. Stillwell, et al. $7,273.64 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Bowman, Thomas vs. George S. Hail, Inc., et al. $5,663.44 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Carroll, John vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al. $1,922.08 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Colt, Jeffrey and Betsy Tsai vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $4,150.48 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Drew, Sr., Calvin N. and Stephanie h/w vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al $33,594.74 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Duminiak, Karla vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, et al. $6,931.71 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Duran-Hernandez, Maria vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al $6,505.86 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Easement Acquisition -Bay Head $111,689.76 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Easement Acquisition - Longport $940.00 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Easement Acquisition - Pacaud, Victoria % HL Collins III -Block 66; Lot 18 -Bay $542.64 Head DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Edwards, Geneithe I. vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc. and Salvatore $4,741.71 Vicari, Jr. DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Estate of Frank Lagano v. State of New Jersey $123,782.89 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA -Parcels C/C-1 Mixed Use Transaction $14,881.20 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Howard Commons Residential $5,291.60 Transaction DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Lodging Area $16,871.92 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Nurses Quarters $7,577.36 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law Officer Housing $3,222.96 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA -Special Counsel for Municpal Law -Mixed-Use Barker Circle Sale and $2,321.04 Redevelopment DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Gill, Nia vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $29,356.82 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Goodwine, Earl vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $464.00 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Jackson-Locklear, Marquess C., et al. v. William Paterson University, et al. $197,265.86 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Lowe, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $28,779.49 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP New Jersey Transit vs. Ronald T. Lewis $1,978.40 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP North Jersey Media Group Inc., d/b/a The Record vs. State of New Jersey Office of $3,120.00 the Governor and Ned Nurick, Assistant Counsel and a Custodian of Public Records for the Office of the Governor DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Pramuk, Dylan vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $14,086.09 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Sirotic, Dean vs. Tutor Perini Corp., et al $2,780.64 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Sprick, Dennis vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $691.20 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Xue Jhe He vs. Guttenberg NJ Police, et al. $4,318.74 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Augustus, Junior J. vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $4,486.28 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Baker, Scott vs. Joy Camarillo, et al. $10,017.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Cagnina, Anthony vs. Gary Lanigan, et al $22,447.54 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Kenly, Tyrone vs. Rutgers State University, et al. $25,307.38 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Lewis, David vs. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, et al $7,357.82 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon RODRIGUEZ, HECTOR VS CORRECTIONS, ET AL. $10,048.39 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Rosenberg, Michael, et al. vs. Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Inc., et al. $53,561.72 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Sanders, Michole vs. Ocean County Bd. of Freeholders, et al. $1,065.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Scott, Darrell Tyrone vs. UMDNJ, et al $3,485.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Vespe, Michael D., et al. vs. Roy Sandau, D.O., et al. $17,298.64 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Vogt, Corey vs. Rutgers University Health Department for the D.O.C., et al. $12,122.25 Drinker Biddle &Reath LLP, NJ Pensions &Health Benefit Study Commission $61,060.66 Philadelphia Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Bilardo, Joseph, Decd vs. University Hospital, et al.; IMO $4,880.00 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Brown, Takeisha; A.A.P., et al vs. Newark Extenden Care Facility, Inc., et al. $29,588.23 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Colantoni, Anthony vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $19,891.39 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Dorval, Jean vs. Abu Ahsan, MD, et al $2,613.32 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Figatner, Robert vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al.; IMO: $11,535.92 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Hammond, Earl M. vs. Carmen Victor, et al $290.00 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Labell, Pamela; A.A.P. of Estate of Jimmy R. Label) v. Robert Wood Johnson $4,340.08 University Hospital, et al. Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Lamar, Valarie vs. Jennifer Petrillo, MD, et al. $3,141.72 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. McDaniels, Angel vs. University Hospital-Newark, et al. $7,780.76 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Melber, Robert vs. United States as substituated for Keegan Johnson, MD, et al; $240.00 IMO Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Miftari, Besnik; Administrator of the Estate of Blerim Miftari, et al vs. Centra STate $4,265.04 Medical Center, et al. Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Morehead, Desiree vs. Rutgers/RWJMS; IMO: $59,010.60 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Morillo, Amy, et al v. University Hospital, et al. $28,554.68 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Perez, Jose, et al v. Warren A. Chiodo, DPM, et al. $20,401.19 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Slater, Ethan; a minor, et al v. Joseph C. Canterino, et al $35,708.43 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Szemple, Craig Francis v. UMDNJ, UCHC, et al $7,563.86 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Ukawabutu, Rumiejah vs. Dr. Abu Ahsan, et al $2,280.40 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Villegas, Francisco vs. Correctional Medical Service, Inc., et al. $3,481.24 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Visconti, John; Administrator of the Estate of Kristi Lynn Rose Visconti; Decd vs. $8,262.95 Lasanta Horana, MD, et al. Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Woszczyk, Magdalena vs. Rutgers; IMO $5,713.25 Dvorak &Associates, LLC, New Mikhaeel, Neveen v. Frederick V. Fitzgerald, et al.; Frederick V. Fitzgerald v. Robert $7,285.20 Brunswick McNamara, et al. Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, FMERA - Advice on Bond and Loan Transactions -Financing of Acquisition from US $6,013.70 Pittsburgh Dept of Army Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program -Cedar $36,767.07 Pittsburgh Meadows Apartments Project Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency IRS Audit ofMulti-Family Conduit $11,986.50 Pittsburgh Revenue Bonds, Series 2014G (Brigantine Homes Project} Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, NJHCFFA -Refunding of State Contract Bonds (Hospital Asset Transformation $32,739.34 Pittsburgh Program - St. Mary's Hospital, Passaic, NJ Issue), Series 2007-1 and State Contract Bonds (Hospital Asset Transformation Program), Series 2008A Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, NJHCFFA -State Contract Bonds (Hospital Asset Transformation Program) $9,750.00 Pittsburgh Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, NJHMFA -Single Family Mortgage-Backed Securities Program -SEC Rule 15Ga-1 $2,194.50 Pittsburgh Disclosure Filings Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, NJHMFA -Stafford Senior Apartments Project $458.12 Pittsburgh Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, NJHMFA Conduit Bond Program -Berkeley Terrace Project $790.18 Pittsburgh Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, NJHMFA Prepayment Opinion &Advice - INCCA Carrol Project (#561) $7,500.00 Pittsburgh Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, NJHMFA Single Family Variable Rate Bonds 2004 Series I, 2004 Series Y, 2007 $7,374.00 Pittsburgh Series V and Series Z -Renewal of RBC and Bank of America Liquidity Facility Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, Retention of Counsel for the New Jersey Department of Agriculture for Intellectual $990.04 Pittsburgh Property Matters Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Ammar Gadalla and Maria Fatima Gadalla vs. New Jersey Department of $1,665.00 Corrections, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-810-17 Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Jose Rivera vs. New Jersey Transit &James Schworn Docket No.: ESX-L-8621-16 $3,905.00 Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Pia Wilson vs. New Jersey Transit, James Schworn, Anthony Bak, Ed Baksa and $8,682.00 Robert Lavell Docket No.: ESX-L-0094-17 Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Usama Henien and Estela Euceda v. NJ Department of Corrections Docket No.: ESX- $5,350.00 L-3669-15 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Atzori, Alexander Luca, an infant, et al. vs. Robert Wood Johnson Health System, et $47,331.40 al. Farkas &Donohue, LLC Economidis, Maria vs. Susannah Wise, MD, et al. $4,160.93 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Gold, Daniel vs. Steven Recih, MD, et a) $102,772.89 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Jamieson, Donna vs. Saad Chaudhary, MD, et al $10,192.37 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Johnson, Isaiah, Jr., an infant, et al vs. Owobamoshola Shonowo, MD, et al $36,041.96 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Labell, Pamela; A.A.P. of Estate of Jimmy R. Labell v. Robert Wood Johnson $139,025.48 University Hospital, et al. Farkas &Donohue, LLC Littman, Walter vs. Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, et al $38,842.20 Farkas &Donohue, LLC McDaniels, Angel vs. University Hospital-Newark, et al. $6,122.80 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Neals, Lionel, et al vs. Mark Adams, MD, et al $4,224.06 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Niblack, Stanley L. vs. UCHC, et al $10,633.00 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Niblack, Stanley L. vs. UMDNJ, University Correctional Healthcare, et al. $75.00 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Oliver, Lorenzo v. Merrill Main, Ph.D., et al $120.00 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Parra, Maria vs. Steven M. Shulman, MD, et al $4,560.76 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Perkins, William vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections; Rutgers University $4,879.10 Healthcare Farkas &Donohue, LLC Perren, Michael, et al vs. Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, et al $79,071.65 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Pickard, Lynn; Executrix of David Pickard; Decd vs. Dr. Dale G. Schaar, et al $9,549.74 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Sapp, Wyatt vs. Newark Beth Isreal Medical Center, et al $66,665.27 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Sedita, Giovanni vs. Morristown Medical Center, et al $421.72 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Sisco, Nancy, et al v. Chan W. Park, MD, et al. $183,721.47 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Swackhamer, Richard D., et al v. Kesler Institute for Rehabilitation, et al. $50,377.21 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Velazquez, Damaris vs. Sheldon Turkish, MD, et al $538.85 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $19,846.86 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Bramson, Marta Ann, et al vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,126.20 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Coronet, Edison A. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $4,989.00 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Dwyer, Kevin v. NJT, et al. $12,619.76 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Squier Hall $17,372.87 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli FMERA Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Allison Hall $6,779.42 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli FMERA- Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Golf Course $6,254.50 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority (FMERA) -Special Counsel for $1,440.00 LLC, Phillipsburg Municipal Law -Eatontown Barracks Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal $8,180.00 LLC, Phillipsburg Law -Charles Wood Fire Station Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Galley, Cheryl vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $21,233.12 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Goodwin, James 1. vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al $7,151.08 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli LaGuerre, et al, Marie Chantal v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $3,552.00 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Marchan, Candy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,651.00 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Mayers, Tracy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $31,272.69 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Mothersill, Elaine vs. Guarding Services Industries, Inc., et al. $240.00 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Muhammad, Nailah vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,729.35 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Odoemene, Emmanuel vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. $18,282.36 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Washington, Frank vs. New York Transit Authority, et al. $1,747.00 LLC, Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli Williams, Ricky vs. New Jersey Transit $4,192.00 LLC, Phillipsburg Garrity and Knisely, Boston Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority $15,477.50 Gebhardt &Kiefer, P.C., Clinton Jammie Rutkowitz vs. James Turner, et al. Civil Case No.: 3:17-cv-06622-FLW-TJB $3,126.80 Gebhardt &Kiefer, P.C., Clinton Nicholas Guidi v. State of New Jersey, et al $41,858.51 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Ammar Gadalla and Maria Fatima Gadalla vs. New Jersey Department of $6,165.00 Corrections, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-810-17 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Investigation of Claims by Nina Bonner of Violations of the New Jersey $1,620.00 Conscientious Employee Protection Act Genova Burns LLC, Newark Michelle Provenzano vs. Montclair State University, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-758-17 $19,191.28 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Sami Zeidan v. Montclair State University, et al $24,560.16 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Usama Henien and Estela Euceda v. NJDOC, et al Docket No.: ESX-L-3669-15 $36,240.36 Gibbons P.C., Newark CIR -Committee of Interns and Residents -Union Contract Negotiations $925.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark CROSS BORDER AND LEVERAGED LEASE TRANS- ACTIONS $5,389.11 Gibbons P.C., Newark CWA (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $1,975.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark CWA Local 1031, Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine (Collective Negotiations $18,589.85 for a Successor Agreement) Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - BCA Cap I L.P. DOL # 17-64308 $45,552.50 (initial transaction) Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - BCA Cap I L.P. DOL # 17-64309 $1,650.00 (post-closing matters) Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - JLL Fund VI, LP -Post closing $2,887.50 Matters Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - Warbug Pincus China, L.P. $1,650.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Alternative Investment -NJHL European Buyout $1,687.50 Investment Fund (post-closing matters) Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Alternative Investment -TPG Real Estate Partners III, LP $45,000.00 (initial transaction) Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Blackstone Capital Partners VII, LP (post-closing) $1,125.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Blackstone Real Estate Partners VII, LP (post-closing $750.00 matters) Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Blackstone Tactical Opportunities Fund - A (PE) (post- $5,660.00 closing) Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Blackstone Tactical Opportunities Fund -Real Estate (post- $1,012.50 closing) Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Carlyle Realty Partners V, LP (post-closing matters) $900.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - GSO Credit - A Partners LP (post-closing) $4,087.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - GSO Energy Partners - A (LP) (post-closing) $1,875.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Hammes Partners II, LP $1,715.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Northwood Real Estate Partners, LP Fund $1,725.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Silver Lake Partners, IV, LP (post-closing matters) $2,850.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - TPG Real Estate Partners II, LP (post-closing matters) $3,037.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - TSG7 A, LP (post-closing matters) $780.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Wheelock Street Real Estate Fund V, LP (post-closing $610.72 matters) Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI -Alternative Investment -Blackstone capital Partners V (post- closing matter) $1,050.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI -Alternative Investment -Elliot Associates, LP Fund $1,275.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI -Alternative Investment -Hammes Partners III, LP (post-closing) $9,715.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI -Alternative Investment - Stonepeak Infrastructure Fund III, LP -Initial $36,052.50 Transaction Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI -Alternative Investment - Stonepeak Infrastructure Fund III, LP -Post-Closing $937.50 Matters Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI -Complex Transactions -PIPE Transactions - Andina Acquisition Corp. II - $600.00 Lazydays Common Stock -Post-closing matters Gibbons P.C., Newark D01 -Complex Transactions -PIPE Transactions - Andina Acquisitions Crop. II - $16,050.00 Lazydays Common Stock -Initial Transaction Gibbons P.C., Newark Health &Professional and Allied Employees {HPAE) -Rowan School of Osteopathic $14,563.22 Medicine (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) Gibbons P.C., Newark Heitman Core Property Fund $8,173.80 Gibbons P.C., Newark IFPTE (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $150.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark International Union of Operating Engineers Local 68 $825.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Lubert Adler Real Estate Fund VI-B $525.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit -Operational Advice $54,226.38 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corp. -Property Acquisition (Gibbons) $393,691.54 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corporation; NJ TransitGrid $217,876.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corporation; Positive Train Control (Gibbons) $827,828.75 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJT -Tribune Shareholder Litigation $4,140.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Retention for Legal Services for the Administrator of the Department of Law and $48,292.00 Public Safety Regarding Prosecutorial Issues Gibbons P.C., Newark Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine AAUP (Collective Negotiations fora $17,422.35 Successor Agreement) Gibbons P.C., Newark SDA - IRVtNGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL - DICKERSON $56.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Fraternal Association and State of. New Jersey Division of State $7,025.00 Police -Amended Unfair Practice Charge Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Fraternal Association v. State of New Jersey &Division of State $32,750.66 Police Court Docket#: MER-L-713-18 Gibbons P.C., Newark Teamster Local Union 97 $10,053.72 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Holland v. Rosen $37,338.28 Angeles Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Holland v. Rosen (APPEAL) $14,687.20 Angeles Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al v. Christie, et al (Gibson Dunn) $356,250.00 Angeles GluckWalrath LLP, Trenton NJEFA -Rowan College at Burlington County HEFT Grant Agreement Amendment $7,500.00 Gordon &Gordon, P.C., Springfield Passaic River Litigation Ongoing Work $2,855.00 Gordon &Rees LLP -Oakland Prime Aid Pharmacy Corp. v. Express Scripts, Inc $12,620.00 Gray Miller Persh LLC, Washington NJPBA -FCC Matters, State Treasurer and the NJPBA $27,697.05 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, American Strategic Insurance Corp. vs. Jordyn Massood, et al Docket No.: CAM-L- $700.00 Woodbridge 3427-17 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Centrella, Lorraine, et al. v. Woodbridge Development Center, et al. $170,386.93 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Christopher Birardi vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections Docket No.: MID-L- $6,994.00 Woodbridge 4193-16 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Concetta Militano a/k/a Connie Militano, et a) v. New Jersey Division of Youth & $2,904.00 Woodbridge Family Services (DYES) a/k/a Division of Child Protection and Permancey (DSPP), et al Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Daria Mammen vs. State of NJ Division of State of State Police, et al. Docket No.: $50,129.00 Woodbridge M ER-L-128-16 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Doe, John as Parent and Legal Guardian of John Doe, Jr., et al. v. New Jersey $71,417.92 Woodbridge Department of Children &Families, et al. Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Doe, John v. State of New Jersey, et al. $7,428.15 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Escobar, Neomi v. Newark Beth Israel Medical Ctr, et al. $562.50 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Glenn, Christina A/K/A Christiana Rezireksyon, et al. v. DCPP, et al. $32,740.25 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Gonzalez, Zenaida, et al. v. State of New Jersey, et al. $58,950.53 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Jaclyn B. Jiras vs. State of NJ, NJ State Police, Colonel Joseph Fuentes, individually $59,169.00 Woodbridge and in his official capacity and Captain Mark Santiago, individually and in his official capacity Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Jacqueline Hawkins-Stiles, et al v. DCPP $59,099.02 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Jane Jones v. Pi Kappa Alpha International Fraternity, Inc., et al $13,076.00 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Jermaine Curry and Tori Curry vs. New Jersey State Prison, et al. Docket No.: MON- $6,418.00 Woodbridge L-937-18 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Lieutenant Dawn Shyner vs. State of NJ et al. Docket No.: MER-L-2294-16 $11,732.50 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Meg Yatauro v. Kevin Bolden, et a) $205,517.61 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Meg Yatauro vs. Kevin Bolden, et al. Docket No.: CAM-L-1901-14 $83,972.67 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Melanie Wilson vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Civil Action No.: 1:16-cv-07915 (RBK- $13,796.00 Woodbridge JS) Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, New Jersey Economic Development Authority Special Counsel -Technology Centre $4,922.00 Woodbridge of New Jersey Condominium Project Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, NJEDA Technology Centre of New Jersey PILOT Agreement Amendment and $5,816.00 Woodbridge possible Tax Appeal Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Penelope Mauer vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-197-17 $3,720.00 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, R.C. v. DYFS (n/k/a Division of Child Protection &Permanency), et al. $49,425.25 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Terence Smith vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections Docket No.: MID-L-1231- $950.00 Woodbridge 17 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Torres, Stephanie, Parent &Legal Guardian of Amaryllis Gomez v. State of New $30,437.45 Woodbridge Jersey; Department of Children &Families, et al. Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, William Klingberg, Administrator, Estate of Tommy Klingberg, deceased vs. New $6,055.00 Woodbridge Lisbon Developmental Center, et al Docket No.: CAM-L-3427-17 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Yvette Gibbons vs. The New Jersey Department of Law &Public Safety, et al. $18,695.00 Woodbridge Docket No.: UNN-L-2766-14 Greenberg Dauber Epstein &Tucker, Adams, Elizabeth, et al. v. New Jersey Civil Service Commission $3,556.00 Newark Greenberg Dauber Epstein &Tucker, Charles Ken Zisa v. John Haviland, et al $212,352.00 Newark Greenberg Dauber Epstein &Tucker, Corey Bland &Virginia Bland v. City of Newark et al $28,301.81 Newark HAWKINS DELAFIELD &WOOD LLP, New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency $19,755,000 Multi-Family $20,995.62 NEW YORK Conduit Revenue Bonds {Washington Dodd Apartments), Series 2012 F-1 and Series 2012 F-2 -IRS Audit HAWKINS DELAFIELD &WOOD LLP, NJ School Development Authority -Review of 2018 Tax Questionnaire Responses $2,212.50 NEW YORK HAWKINS DELAFIELD &WOOD LLP, NJSDA - NJEDA School Facilities Construction Bonds Review of Post -Issuance Tax $3,900.00 NEW YORK Compliance Questionnaires 2017 HAWKINS DELAFIELD &WOOD LLP, Office of Public Finance -Federal Tax Advice for Go Bonds $3,197.74 NEW YORK HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Atlantic City $80.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Barbara Kaplan, Block 18.67, Lot 3 -Long Beach Township $1,510.96 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Bart &Jill Blaststein, Block 7.01, Lot 6 -Margate $4,057.57 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Beach Haven (Bateman) $3,607.28 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Donald Goldberg; Block 20.87; Lot 4 -Long Beach Township $2,424.24 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Fred Weber &Joanne Mazza, Block 12, Lot 16 -Margate $4,333.18 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Geoffrey &Michelle Greenberg, Block 12, Lot 8 -Margate $2,237.20 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Ghada Jebara, Block 20.47, Lot 4 -Long Beach Township $7,594.96 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Jeanette Frankenberg, Block 20.45, Lot 4 -Long Beach $32,366.81 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Joel Golden; Block 20.117; Lot 7 -Long Beach Township $1,043.52 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Larry R. Sr. &Nancy A. Bechtel -Block 19, Lot 4.13 - $1,010.00 Elsinboro Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - LNM Group, LLC; Block 20.129; Lot 1.10 -Long Beach $29,588.18 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Margate $1,456.76 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Mark &Christine Scott -Block 12, Lot 2 - Elsinboro $339.25 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Nahla Jebara, Block 18, Lot 3 -Long Beach Township $5,214.15 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Nancy Roncati, Block 20.67, Lot 4 -Long Beach Township $4,273.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -North Beach, 1003, LLC, Block 18.03, Lot 4 -Long Beach $926.00 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Richard A. Cherner, Block 18, Lot 9 -Margate $320.40 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Richard Carolan; Block 20.68; Lot 1 -Long Beach Township $928.64 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Richard Kowazlski, Block 20.35, Lot 1.04 -Long Beach $524.96 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Richard Tavoso -Block 4; Lots 1, 1.01- Mantoloking Boro $2,281.40 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Robert Helemian; Block 20.109; Lot 1.04 -Long Beach $904.64 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Robertine Ann Mayer -Block 12, Lot 23 - Elsinboro $20.00 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Shanin Spector; Block 20.89; Lot 5 -Long Beach Township $441.04 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Sheldon Bonovitz, Block 20.03, Lot 4 -Long Beach Township $1,915.44 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Stephen Voda; Block 77; Lot 3 -Ship Bottom $440.48 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Stonis Family, LLC; Block 20.82; Lot 1 -Long Beach $12,602.41 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Thomas Kline, Block 20.37, Lot 1.05 -Long Beach Township $381.12 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Varunan Sivalingam, Block 18.61, Lot 1.03 -Long Beach $2,066.24 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -William Mascharka; Block 20.127; Lot 1.03 -Long Beach $5,827.92 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Windmill Properties, Block 79, Lot 1& 2 -Atlantic City $6,568.96 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition- Omni AC, LLC, Block 84, Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 -Atlantic City $980.00 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Manufacturers and Traders Trust Co. v. Marina Bay Towers Urban Renewal II, et al. $144,882.50 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Mills, Whitlock LL (NJHMFA) $125,866.96 HILL WALLACK, Princeton New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency Egg Harbor Township Family $7,000.00 Project Follow-Up Work HILL WALLACK, Princeton NJT -Hoboken Terminal Redevelopment $23,200.52 HILL WALLACK, Princeton NJT-69th Bridge -Property Acquisition - "C" $200.24 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Somerville &New Bridge Landing (River Edge) $23,360.96 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Albanese, Vincent John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $15,468.34 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Alvino, Lane vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,154.96 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Archibald, Roger vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $129.28 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Arzuaga, Luis v. NJTRO, Inc. $7,454.78 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bartman, Jack vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations $8,363.98 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Beck, James vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $5,665.18 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Blunt, Jamil vs. New Jersey Tranist, et al. $1,924.96 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bonsall, William and Sheri Bonsall; his wife vs. State of New Jersey, New Jersey $8,526.58 Transit, et al. Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Brown, Cornelius E. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $993.52 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Burnett, Merium and Jesse James, h/w vs. National Railroad Passenger $5,921.24 Corporation a/k/a Amtrak and New Jersey Transit Corporation Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Carfi, Raffaele and Joana Carfi, husband and wife vs. NJ Transit, et al. $2,417.99 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Cifarelli, Joseph R. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,379.69 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Conrad, Steven vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operatins, Inc. $18,424.27 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Crennan, Thomas J. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,226.67 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC D'Amico, Nicole, et al. vs. John E. Mayo, Sr., et al. $1,860.88 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Devincenzo, Shawn vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $5,281.09 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC DiGiacomo, Vincent and Dawn DiGiacomo, h/w vs. Betty L. Harris-Wilson, et al. $13,974.26 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ellis, Kenneth vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $9,321.92 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC English, Tamika, Administratrix of the Estate of Herman English, Deceased, et al v. $96,171.02 NJ Transit Corporation, et al. Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Fitzsimmons, Jesse vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,139.19 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Hlywiak, Karen & Peter Hlywiak, her husband vs. National Railroad Passenger $177.28 Corporation d/b/a Amtrak, et al. Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Holmes, Sandra vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $18,955.89 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Horner, David L. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,952.68 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Howard, Kandace and Myson Hampton vs. New Jersey Transit Authority $980.80 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Jenkins, Jermaine v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,616.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Jenkins, Jermaine, et al. v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $26,106.50 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Jimenez, Enrique vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $17,151.74 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Johnson, Jerome C. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (NJT) $480.16 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Johnson, Jerome C. vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $145.36 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Leonard, Brian vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $13,129.98 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Maher, Terry vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $55,356.51 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC McEvoy, Matthew vs. New Jersey Transit Operations, Inc. $6,944.65 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC McGlothen, Cynthia, et al v. Estate of Herman English, et al. $240.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Mirza, Zulfigar H. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,865.06 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Nanney, Sandra, et al v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,472.94 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Powers, Kevin vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,300.08 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Prawdzik, Edward vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations $227.82 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ritchey, Douglas vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,133.20 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Rollins, Tomikakim, et al v. Tammy Ross-Caffee, et al. $16,547.88 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Smith, Tyree vs. New Jersey Transit Rail $10,871.76 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Tumfour, Carruthers vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,132.48 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Van Jura, Jeffrey vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,231.05 Ice Miller LLP Application IRC Provisions. State Pensions Statutes and Unclaimed Property Law to $83,532.60 Unclaimed Individual Contributions to State Pension Plans Ice Miller LLP DeGarcia v. Kean University (EL Settlement Counseling) $9,105.75 Ice Miller LLP New Jersey Department of Education -Pension Tax Advice Regarding Renaissance $32,025.79 Schools Ice Miller LLP NJHMFA -Formation of an OPEB Trust $12,825.49 Ice Miller LLP Pension Project 2017 $13,036.19 Ice Miller LLP Special Counsel Designation -State Retirement Plans and State Health Benefit $65,607.49 Plans Ice Miller LLP State Retirement Plans - IRS Audit of Ocean County College $16,713.24 Ice Miller LLP State Retirement Plans -IRS Audit of Rowan College at Burlington County $16,659.17 Jackson Lewis P.C. -White Plains NY New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice Non-Commissioned Officers Association (CJ $650.00 Investigators) Joel M. Miklacki, Passaic MVC v. Christopher Reeder $1,131.81 Joel M. Miklacki, Passaic MVC v. Girgis, Tarek F. $4,425.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Brick $12,457.50 John 1. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Craig Jackson -Block 46.02; Lot 34 -Brick Township $389.72 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - D&R Rento Holdings, LLC -Block 58; Lot 1-Brick Township $924.87 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Falls LP % Dr. C. Rossakis -Block 4; Lots S. 8.01 - $985.00 Mantoloking Boro John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Fenelon Properties, Inc. -Block 52.01; Lot 11 -Brick $150.00 Township John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Jstar, LLC -Block 36, Lots 11.06, 11.07 -Brick Township $345.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Kahanovitz, Neil & Suzzanne -Block 57; Lot 1 -Brick $570.00 Township John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Mantoloking $4,097.50 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Raymond Braun -Block 57; Lot 2 -Brick Township $315.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Richard Malouf -Block 52.01; Lot 8 -Brick Township $315.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Ronald O'Malley -Block 58; Lot 6 -Brick Township $1,529.61 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Thomas Buckley -Block 50.02; Lot 4 -Brick Township $925.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -William McCarthy -Block 36, Lot 10.07 -Brick Township $705.00 Kaplan, Kirsch &Rockwell -Denver NJ Transit Corp; County Yard/Delco Lead/Megal Lead Acquisitions, Surface $50,900.17 Transportation Board and Federal Railroad Proceedings and Property Interest Acquisitions Kaplan, Kirsch &Rockwell -Denver NJ Transit Corporation -Gateway Program Financing (Kaplen Kirsch) $273,476.15 Kaplan, Kirsch &Rockwell -Denver NJT - NECSA, PRIAA and Fast Matters, and Related Surface Transportation Board $23,806.44 and Federal Railroad Administration Cases and Property Interest Acquisitions Kaplan, Kirsch &Rockwell -Denver Proposed Re-Assignment of Trackage Rights from Norfolk Southern to Dover $7,193.05 Delaware Railroad and Related Surface Transportation Board Issues Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Motor Vehicle Commission v. Elvis Rodriguez OAL Docket No.: MVH 17960-17 $3,185.00 Edison Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Motor Vehicle Commission V. Shawn Curry OAL Docket No.: MVH 13488-17 $1,590.00 Edison Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, MVC v. Brian E. Kowasa $990.00 Edison Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, MVC v. Emma Lee $2,430.00 Edison Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, MVC v. Jeffrey Sgro $1,905.00 Edison Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, MVC v. Senthil Odayappan $3,300.00 Edison Kent &McBride, P.C., New Jersey State of New Jersey v. (Kristen) Christian Sheehan $3,900.00 Cherry Hill Kent &McBride, P.C., New Jersey State of New Jersey v. Adeaga, Oyedolapo $2,662.50 Cherry Hill Kent &McBride, P.C., New Jersey State of New Jersey v. Buckley, Joan $2,428.25 Cherry Hill Kent &McBride, P.C., New Jersey State of New Jersey v. Christopher LaBruna, Steven Fritz, Carlos Ramirez &John $525.00 Cherry Hill Harris Kent &McBride, P.C., New Jersey State of New Jersey v. Hicks, Heather $1,960.67 Cherry Hill Kent &McBride, P.C., New Jersey State of New Jersey v. Matthew D'Augustine $1,462.50 Cherry Hill Kent &McBride, P.C., New Jersey State of New Jersey v. Schmidt, Leah A. $1,575.00 Cherry Hill Kissane Associates, St. Albans Rasmussen, William, Estate of $1,704.75 Krompier & Tamn, L.L.C., Parsippany Kriviruk, Alisa vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al $4,837.66 Kutak Rock LLP, Omaha NJT -Retirement and Health &Welfare Plans (Retirement) $2,829.00 Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company as Subrogee of Timothy Gregory v. $3,651.06 Philadelphia New Jersey Transit Corporation Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Barber, Richard K. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $30,084.69 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco K.ulp, Barber, Richard K. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,504.00 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Bayers, Raymond vs. New Jersey Transit $4,135.48 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Bentivenga John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,919.48 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Bentivenga, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $23,245.25 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Brown, Alice vs. New Jersey Transit $9,427.16 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Burnett, Hafeez vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $5,273.00 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Byers, Raymond vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $37,709.59 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Fosetta, Christopher v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, et al. $28,480.02 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Gooding, Francis vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $41,115.05 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Gooding, Francis vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $19,831.36 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Griffin, Twana and Hiwatha Bunn vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc., et al $400.00 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Joy, Brendan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $15,584.00 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Judge, Jeffrey vs. Evelyn Lewis, Larry Lewis and New Jersey Transit $24,955.08 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Kreitz, Jr., George vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $27,608.24 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Kreitz, Jr., George vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,663.00 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Lavance, Everett K. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $407.48 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Miller, Caroline vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. $1,120.00 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Quinones, Raniel, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corp. $4,088.00 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Robinson, Lewis and Latif Comegys vs. New Jersey Transit $3,607.48 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Smith, Gary M. vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $407.48 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Smith, Gregor vs. New Jersey Transit $12,898.90 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Viggiano, Russell v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $649.68 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Watson, Shirley, et al. v. Best Transit, Inc., et al. $96.00 Philadelphia Law Office of Dolores Rocco Kulp, Wright, Gilbert v. New Jersey Transit $27,781.77 Philadelphia Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Alexandra M. Bittle vs. Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, Harry Beam Docket No.: BUR-L- $9,945.25 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Dearie, Joseph L., Jr. v. Honorable Edward V. Gannon, et al. $80.00 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Erin Shelton vs. State of New Jersey -New Jersey State Police, et al. Docket No.: $10,337.00 Lambertville M ER-L-1587-16 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Gerald T. Boswell vs. Office of the Public Defender, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1066- $2,784.00 Lambertville 03 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Henien, Usama, et al. v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. $11,520.18 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., In re Unemployment Benefit Claim Filed by Todd Charles Barretta $6,758.96 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., James Fleming vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-750-17 $12,765.29 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Joan Lombard vs. New Jesrey Department of Transportation Case No.: 1:18-CV- $9,126.00 Lambertville 01319-RBK-KMW Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Joseph Torres vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1859-16 $17,008.00 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Kelcey Burgess vs. State of New Jersey (Department of Environmental Protection $3,967.00 Lambertville and Division of Fish and Wildlife).Docket No.: HNT-L-0205-16 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Marquis Harris vs. New Jersey Department of Human Services, et al. Docket No.: $20,036.50 Lambertville M ER-L-0243-16 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., OSHA Whistleblower Complaint filed by Todd c. Barretta against NJ TRANSIT $19,172.09 Lambertville Corporation and Steven Santoro, Executive Director under the Federal Railroad Safety Act ("FRSA") Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Peterson, Bradley C. v. A. Matlock, Jr., et al. $77,731.31 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Ratarsha Willis v. Carl Walker. et al. -APPEAL $680.00 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Robbins, Wayne v. Kevin Bolden, et al. $260.00 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Sean Tonner vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections and Jerome Scott Docket $7,281.00 Lambertville No.: MID-L-7507-17 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Wahab, Atiya v. State of New Jersey, et al. $7,555.12 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Willis, Ratarsha v. Carl Walker, et al. $8,673.00 Lambertville LeClair Ryan, Richmond Jose Rivera vs. NJ Transit &James Schworn $40,106.25 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Katrina Osborne vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and Kevin Ruff, Individually $36,642.08 and John Does 1-5 Docket No.: ESX-L-2151-15 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Klugman, Jeffrey v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $162,250.53 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Lieb, Drew v. State of New Jersey, Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness $35,771.37 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Maria Brito v. Ramapo College $8,823.88 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Marianna Tropeano vs. NJ Transit Police Department, et al. Docket No.: MID-L- $42,721.66 1734-17 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Mildalia Madlinger vs.New Jersey Transit Corporation Docket No.: ESX-L-4844-14 $23,381.04 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Monica Goulbourne vs. New Jersey Veteran's Memorial Home-Paramus Docket $3,708.64 No.: BER-L-2114-16 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Pia Wilson Vs. NJ Transit, et. al $175,426.36 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Request Medical Staffing, LLC D/B/A Request Staffing v. Joseph Scully $3,988.03 Lenox, Socey, Formidoni, Brown, Averona, Dominique; Administratrix, et al vs. Henry R. Schuitema, D.O., et al. $15,416.27 Giordano, Cooley &Casey, LLC, Lawrenceville Lenox, Socey, Formidoni, Brown, Budden, Christopher L., et al v. William Paul Block, DO, et al $87,819.35 Giordano, Cooley &Casey, LLC, Lawrenceville Lenox, Socey, Formidoni, Brown, Luciano Twins; Vincent Luciano &Juliana Luciano; Minors, et al vs. So. Jersey $6,602.87 Giordano, Cooley &Casey, LLC, Healthcare, et al. Lawrenceville Lenox, Socey, Formidoni, Brown, Sylla, Kemo; A.A.P., et al vs. Thomas Hegy, MD, et al $18,117.55 Giordano, Cooley &Casey, LLC, Lawrenceville Lenox, Socey, Formidoni, Brown, Watts-Naley, Beverly; O/B/0; The Estate of Levis F. Nalley vs. Cooper University $6,677.97 Giordano, Cooley &Casey, LLC, Hospital, et al. Lawrenceville Lite DePalma Greenberg Bradley C. Peterson v. Administrator Christopher Holmes, et al $26,562.50 Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Division of Investment -Advent International Global Private Equity VIII, LP (initial $60,000.00 transaction) Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Division of Investment -Alternative Investment Aspect Core Diversified Program $40,683.60 (Initial transaction) Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Division of Investment -Alternative Investment Chatham Private Debt and $198.00 Strategic Capital Fund -Initial Transaction Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Division of Investment -American Industrial Partners Capital Fund, IV, LP (post- $43,970.40 closing matters) Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Division of Investment -Catalyst Fund Limited Partnership V $45,000.00 Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Division of Investment -Focus Healthcare Partners Fund I, LP (initial transaction) $60,001.60 Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Division of Investment -Focus Healthcare Partners Fund I, LP (post-closing matters) $14,097.60 Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Division of Investment -Lynx Common (Bermuda) Ltd. (post-closing matters) $7,484.40 Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Division of Investment - MKP Opportunity Fund $12,988.80 Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Division of Investment - Onex Partners IV, LP $118.80 Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston Division of Investment - WLR Recovery Fund IV, LP (post-closing matters) $3,168.00 Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston DOI -Alternative Investment - VALUEACT CAPITAL PARTNERS II, L.P. (post-closing $158.40 matter) Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston DOI -Alternative Investment Onex Partners V. LP -Initial Transaction $45,000.00 Locke Lord LLP (EAPD), Boston DOI -Alternative Investment Onex Partners V. LP -Post-Closing Matters $11,523.60 Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Roseland Equal Employment Opportunity Matter $33,445.80 Lukas, LaFuria, Gutierrez &Sachs, LLP, NJ Transit's Positive Train Control Project/Radio Frequency Spectrum FCC Matters $63,976.00 McLean Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland NJT Acquisition/One and Two Penn Plaza East (NJT Headquarters)( Lum Drasco) $317,218.14 Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland Special Counsel Designation - NJ Transit Corporation Jersey city Municipal Utilities $79,698.55 Authority Claim -November 2014 Sewage Force Main Break Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Belfand, Seman vs. Raymond Petosa and New Jersey Transit Corporation, C-83585- $10,764.50 444 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Berger, Erica vs. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey vs. New Jersey Transit $4,932.75 Bus Operations, Inc. Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Fetahu, Valdona v. New Jersey Transit Corp. $7,399.63 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Henry, Kathleen vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $8,953.25 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Holmes-Moses, Iraida vs. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey $3,047.25 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Huerta, Michael A. vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $3,497.85 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Lan, Mario and Elizabeth Lan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,694.84 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Lee, Vong vs. Justen Oriolo, et a) $2,527.00 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Wallace, Karen vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. and Carlos Trujillo $1,725.75 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Westchester Radiology and Imaging, P.C., Assignment of Anyhony Brewington vs. $6,528.00 NJ Transit Corp. M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency Multi-Family Housing Revenue $4,860.00 Bonds -Revenue Fund Release 2018 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA - Captial Program Fund Revenue Bonds -Redemption of 2004 and/or $26,665.00 2007 Series Bond M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA -Conduit Bond Program -Flemington Junction Apts Proj $25,000.00 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA Conduit Bond Program -Commons Family &Senior Project $15,441.16 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA Conduit Bond Program -Douglas Homes Project $15,440.29 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA Conduit Bond Program -Gardens Family &Senior Project $15,431.22 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA Conduit Bond Program -Roseville Senior Project $15,439.41 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA Multi-Family Conduit Bond Program -Victorian Towers Project $28,124.32 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA Perth Amboy Housing Authority Family RAD Project $28,152.11 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation Post Issuance Tax Compliance $9,495.00 MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Gibbs, Jamal vs. University Correction) Healthcare, et al. $55,736.62 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Harris, Fresnel vs. University Hospital, et al. $5,808.50 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Kisby, Jessica vs. NJ DOC, et al. $4,780.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Lombardi, Christopher; Decd vs. Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, et al $11,357.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Marcucci, Kimberly; Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Marcucci, Decd vs. $16,616.00 Knolls Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Morrison, Michele vs. Seyedehsara Seyedali, MD, et al. $7,329.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Neals, Lionel, et al vs. Mark Adams, MD, et al. $4,379.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Nyamuchiwa, Kudazviro vs. Marc I Malberg, MD et al $2,508.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Onyekaomelu, Peter and Kamilah vs. UMDNJ, et al (appeal) $8,674.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Samia-Sabahia, Rachel; a/k/a Baby Lo Gatto vs. Andrew Rubenstein, MD, et al. $18,754.40 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Sisco, Nancy, et al v. Chan W. Park, MD, et al. $31,871.42 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Sleiman, Helena; Executrix of the Estate of Antoine Sleiman; Decd vs. Michael $17,743.30 Knolls Piscopiello, MD, et al. MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Suriano, Immacolata; Decd, et al v. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et $18,199.00 Knolls al. MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Sutherland, Vanessa vs. Andrei Botea, MD, et al $29,064.38 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Vervan, Joseph, representative of Nancy Vervan; Decd vs. University Hospital, et al $10,843.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $19,625.20 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Williams vs. Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences; IMO $1,960.00 Knolls McCarter &English, LLP, Newark New New Jersey Economic Development Authority -State Lease Revenue Refunding $20,332.86 Jersey Bonds, 2004 Series A (State Office Buildings Projects) Cash Defeasance McCarter &English, LLP, Newark New NJEDA -Life Sciences/Technology Special Counsel -Edison Partners IX $10,127.79 Jersey McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Anderson, George III, v. NJDMAVA, et al. $136,329.70 Carpenter LLP, Morristown N1 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Baskerville, Stephen;Admin. of the Estate of Bernis Lavelle Jordan; Decd vs. Robert $2,705.25 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Behling, Cynthia vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $8,365.12 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Brady Middlesworth v. Board of Trustees, Public Employees' Retirement System $8,840.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Clarification of Unit Petitions - Group Y $4,200.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & CNJSCL AFT, AFL-CIO Adjunct Unit (Collective Negotiations for a Successor $5,580.40 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Agreement) McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & CNJSCL AFT-CIO -Faculty/Professional Staff Unit (Collective Negotiations fora $27,325.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Successor Agreement McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Collective Bargaining Negotiations w/PBA (NJT) $37,237.89 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Crus, Israel vs. Leamon McKenzie, et al $4,582.48 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Demusso, Sergio vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,560.68 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & DeRobertis, Nicholas vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $448.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Diane Scott, et al v. State of NJ, et al $52,745.44 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Employment Termination -Amanda Welch $1,240.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Employment Termination Grievance -Barbara Dole $10,597.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Jenkins, Leslie E. v. Montclair State University, et al. $29,240.80 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Mayers, Tracy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,169.68 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Negotiations between the New Jersey Transit Police Department and the Fraternal $4,980.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ Order of Police, Local 37 related to the collective bargaining agreement McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & NJ Transit Corporation -Labor Counsel -Amalgamated Transit Union Contracts $3,071.76 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & NJ Transit Corporation -Labor Counsel -Employee Compensation Issues $5,765.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & NJ Transit Corporation -Labor Counsel Rail Contracts $50,500.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & NJHMFA -Arbitration Concerning Prescription Drug Benefits $3,010.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Peoples, Christine v. Montclair State University $11,261.91 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Robinson, Raphael, et al v. new Jersey Transit Rail Operaions, Inc. $13,006.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Speed, Schanel, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $7,716.28 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & State of New Jersey and Council of New Jersey State College Locals, AFT $13,735.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Tangia Price v. New Jersey Transit, et al (McElroy) $374,119.79 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Tarboro, Oscar v. Board of Trustees, Public Employees' Retirement System $1,400.00 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Tietze, Deborah v. New Jersey Pinelands Commission $77,769.49 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Township of Little Falls v. Montclair State University $11,628.92 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Villapando, Maurine A. v. Raritan Bay Medical Center, et al. $67,121.68 Carpenter LLP, Morristown NJ McGivney & Kluger, PC, Florham Park Belfand, Seman vs. Raymond Petosa and New Jersey Transit Corporation, C-83585- $6,345.00 444 McGivney & Kluger, PC, Florham Park Fofana, Mamadou, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,728.00 McKool Smith, Dallas NJT v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, et al. (McKool Smith) $415,019.77 McManimon, Scotland &Baumann, NJ Higher Education Student Assistance Authority 2018 Series Bonds $44,098.25 L.L.C., Roseland Methfessel & Werbel Moore, Leroy v. Middlesex Cnty Pros Off., et al. $705.00 Michael A. Armstrong &Associates, Boswell, Gerald v. Office of the Public Defender, et al. $8,223.00 LLC, Willingboro Michael A. Armstrong &Associates, State of New Jersey v. Caldwell, Isaiah $1,050.00 LLC, Willingboro Michael A. Armstrong &Associates, State of New Jersey v. Colasanto, Jeanine $135.00 LLC, Willingboro Michael A. Armstrong &Associates, State of New Jersey v. Flynn, Nathan and Duda, Joseph $2,175.00 LLC, Willingboro Michael A. Armstrong &Associates, State of New Jersey v. Jackson, Joshua, Officer & Busanardo, Brett, C.O. $2,408.87 LLC, Willingboro Michael A. Armstrong &Associates, State of New Jersey v. Mongiovi, Stephen $315.00 LLC, Willingboro Michael A. Armstrong &Associates, State of New Jersey v. Timothy Ballard $483.16 LLC, Willingboro Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Aly, Angie vs. John Wessel, et al $27,194.99 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Buch, Corri, et al v. Rutgers, et al $12,336.33 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Corliss, Megan vs. Kelly Bloodgood, et al; IMO $5,932.50 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Corrado, Thomas, et al v. Warren Chiodo, DPM, et al $880.00 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Cynthia Phillips, et al v. NJ Veterans Memorial Home -Paramus, et al $8,708.88 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Deshefy, Jeffrey R. Jr., et al v. Michael G. Nosko, MD, et al $2,240.00 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Feltynowski, Kelly A. vs. Andrew G. Kaufman, MD, et al. $4,988.68 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Frankel, Douglas P.; A.A.P., et al vs. Boris Veysman, MD, et al $12,669.20 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Geiger, Edgar C., III; Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, $1,712.50 Park et al Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Greene, William Haywood, III vs. University Hospital and UMDNJ $1,040.00 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Hambrick-Esby, Deborah G. as Court Appointed Guardian of Reginald Hambrick v. $3,649.04 Park Woodbridge Developmental Center, et al. Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Harris, Evelyn v. Rutgers Biomedical &Health Sciences $10,785.60 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Jones, Imani Siobhan vs. US Food &Drug Administration, et al. $660.00 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Kadonsky, Steven vs. Abu Ahsan, MD, et al $8,729.60 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Keating, Gwendolyn vs. Don Yoon Cha, MD, et al; imo $2,920.00 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Little, AI-Kaseem vs. Donique Ivery, et al. $4,209.68 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Ma, Rita v. Princeton Surgical Associates, PA, et al. $5,742.06 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Mcfeeley, William, et al vs. Sunny Kar, D.O., et al. $30,824.33 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham McNellis-Wallace, Eileen, et al v. Anthony Salerno, MD, et al. $11,367.29 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Olejnik, Adriane; Ad Prosequendum, of the Estate of John Olejnik, Jr. vs. Adena J. $6,375.00 Park Osband, M.D., et al. Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Potter, Eric v. James Glover, et al $200.00 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Price, Kathleen v. RWJUH, et al $4,920.00 Park Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Roxas, Estate of Salvatoris vs. University Hospital, et al; IMO: $4,100.00 Park Michael J. Lungs, Esq., LLC, Florham Sherry Leaks, et al v. New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home Menlo Park, et al. $4,120.00 Park Docket No.: MID-L-2506-18 Michael J. Lungs, Esq., LLC, Florham Sprague, Shannon M.; Administratrix, et al vs. Princeton Healthcare System, et al.; $7,100.00 Park IMO Michael J. Lungs, Esq., LLC, Florham Tolver, Edward R.; An Incapacitated Person, et al vs. Kennedy University Hopital, et $1,640.00 Park al. Michael J. Lungs, Esq., LLC, Florham Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $7,824.00 Park Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and New Jersey Investigators Association, Lodge 174 (Collective Negotiations fora $18,414.81 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Successor Agreement) Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and New Jersey Law Enforcement Commanding Officers Association (Collective $3,638.20 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and New Jersey Law Enforcement Supervisors Association (Collective Negotiations fora $3,363.63 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Successor Agreement) Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and New Jersey Superior Officers Law Enforcement Unit (Collective Negotiations fora $12,043.63 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Successor Agreement) Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and PBA 105 (Collective Negotiation for a Successor Agreement) $4,378.85 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Retention for Legal Services for Administrator of the Department of Law &Public $199,300.92 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Safety Regarding the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and State PBA, State Law Enforcement Unit (Collective Negotiations for a Successor $9,931.85 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Agreement) Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Toolen, William, et al. v. State of New Jersey $18,462.62 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Ammar Gadalla and Maria Fatima Gadalla vs. New Jersey Department of $2,745.00 Corrections, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-810-17 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Bruce Skoorka v. Kean University, et al $28,582.08 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Claims Against HESAA: Debt Collection Practices $26,923.77 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Efthimia N. Christie, ED.D vs. Kean University, et al. Docket No.: UNN-L-739-17 $5,080.00 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Evelyn Nieves-Lalama vs. State of New Jersey (Division of Child Protection and $23,189.76 Permanency), et al. Docket No.: PAS-L-3843-15 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Juan Daniel Perez vs. New Jersey City University, et al. Docket No.: HUD-L-1845-14 $3,888.84 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Julienne Whitten vs. Kean University, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-6549-17 $2,200.00 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Karen Shanks vs. Newark Public Schools, et al. Docket No.: UNN-L-3016-15 $58,691.36 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Kelly Craig Hagen v. New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority, et $2,360.00 al Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Latrece Hagans vs. New Jersey Division of Child Protection &Permanency, et al. $24,325.53 Docket No.: PAS-L-2597-15 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Lavern Sanders vs. Division of Children and Family Services, et al. Docket No.: HUD- $5,433.04 L-1533-16 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Monica Miller v. NJDOC Docket No.: ESX-L-4170-14 Docket No.: ESX-L-4170-14 $29,037.24 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Rose Richardson v. State of NJ, Office of the Attorney General $14,050.68 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Saint-Surin, Carmen, et al. v. Gustavo Reyes, et al. $5,650.16 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Schoenstein, Matthew, et al. v. Richard E. Constable, III. Commissioner, et al. $11,252.92 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Smith, Diamond, Estate of, et al. v. State of New Jersey, Division of Child Protection $27,141.86 & Permanency, et al. Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Triebe, Robert v. State of NJ, et al. $29,387.78 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Usama Henien and Estela Euceda v. NJDOC, et al Docket No.: ESX-L-3669-15 $8,075.85 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Anthony DeSantis v. New Jersey Transit, et a) $2,096.64 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Anthony Desantis vs. New Jersey Transt, et al. Docket No.: 14-3578 $17,518.40 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Biassou, Gary, et al vs. John Fitzsimmons, M.D., et al $19,894.64 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Brian Weimer vs. Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, et al. Docket No.: ATL-L-2399-17 $5,635.00 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Bricker, Barbara, et al. v. Kennedy Health System, et al $2,198.20 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall DiNapoli, Jill vs. Anthony Salerno, M.D. $18,717.09 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Doglio, Jaime A., et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson Medical Group, et al. $167,422.63 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dougherty, Joann; A.A.P., et al v. Kennedy Health System, et al $6,862.20 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Economidis, Maria vs. Susannah Wise, MD, et al. $36,889.31 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Esawy, Nawal; a minor, et al vs. Joseph Chong, MD, et al. $495.24 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Gary DeMarzo and Samuel Lashman vs. Cape May County Prosecutor Robert $14,920.18 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Taylor, et al. Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Grassia, Maurice R., Jr; Executor of the Estate of Elizabeth K. Grassia v. Underwood $13,237.36 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Memorial Hospital, et al. Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Gueye, Lateefah; F/K/A; Lateefah Whitfield; Guardian of Trevohn Kyree Sterling; an $124,456.20 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin infant vs. William Scorza, et al Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall James A. Cocores, MD v. NJ State Board of Medical Examiners $7,350.00 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Jones, Nikki vs. University Hospital, et al. $35,758.23 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Keith Stopko vs. New Jersey Attorney General, et al. $132,281.60 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Maronski, Walter, et a) v. Kennedy Health System, Inc., et a) $22,598.01 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Mcginley, Audrey, Administrator of the Estate of Daniel McGinley vs. Elisabeth $10,242.48 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Palmara, et al. Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Morales, Maria, et al v. Gregory Peck, DO, et al $13,475.37 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Muhammad, Winter Hazael; an infant, et al vs. Pierre F. Lespinasse, MD, et al. $1,525.24 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Nicole DeBiase v. NJTransit $229,794.50 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Redmond, Phillip A., II vs. Virtua West Jersey Health System, et al. $38,554.14 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Rosu, Dylan vs. Atlanticare Regional Medical Center City Campus, et al; IMO $2,250.00 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Salifu, Falila; A.A.P. of Janai Adama Maanda Salifu; Decd vs. University Hospital, et $1,235.00 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin al Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Salvernini, Mauro, et al v. Naieml Nassiri, MD, et al $9,714.08 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Santiago, Janice; A.A.P. of Jovanny Santiago vs. Kennedy Health Care Facilities, et $5,695.32 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin al. Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Semmon, Ebony; A.A.P., et al vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $485.52 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Simon, Sabu, et al vs. Joel Sheinfeld, MD, et al. $1,725.00 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Stephanie Carter-Green vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-580-15 $23,010.00 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Still, Denise Y.; Administrator of the Estate of Everlon M. Still, Jr. vs. Voorhees $100.00 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Center, et al; IMO Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Verdi, Shannon &Ralph vs. Anthony P. Salerno, MD, et al. $11,400.84 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Vitale, Joseph vs. Corey Golding, MD, et al $2,240.40 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Zwolinski, Barbara F.; Administrator of the Estate of Frank J. Zwolinski; Decd vs. $74,034.08 Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Kenneth Kaufman, MD, et al. Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment -Benefit Street Partner Special Situations Fund L.P. (post $2,232.50 closing matter) Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - Cerberus - NJ Loan Fund, LP (post-closing] $1,092.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - JLL Partners Fund VII, LP (post-closing matters) $1,045.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment -Knight Tao, LP, 2015 Investment -New Series (post-closing $1,282.50 matters) Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment -Separate Account Managed by Golden Tree Asset $2,185.00 Management (post-closing matters) Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - SONJ Private Opportunities II, LP - 2016 Additional $332.50 Investment (post-closing matters) Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment - TPG Start, LP (post-closing matters) $190.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI -Alternative Investment - Prologis European Properties Fund II $8,265.00 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI -Alternative Investment -The Resolute Fund II, LP -Post Closing Matters $1,062.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Special Counsel Designation -State of New Jersey, Department of Treasury, $119,434.94 Appointment as Disclosure Counsel O~Brien &Ryan, LLP Kelly, John J.; Decd, et al vs. Lourdes Health System, et al $18,148.37 O~Brien &Ryan, LLP Mills, Dawn, et al. vs. Kennedy Memorial Hospital-Stratford Division, et al $47,119.16 O~Brien &Ryan, LLP Pollitt-Milcarek, Regina, Michael Milcarek (w/h) vs. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical $18,736.62 Center, Inc., et al. O~Brien &Ryan, LLP Welch, Kathleen, et al v. Kennedy University Hospital, Inc., et al. $2,678.68 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency - 540 Broad Street Apartments $66,680.80 HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA Project OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency -Single Family Housing Revenue $50,025.38 HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA Bonds - 2018 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program -Lincoln $1,104.00 HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA Towers Remarketing October 2017 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency -Conduit Bond Program - $20,290.80 HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA Wemrock Senior Living Project OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & NJHMFA -Conduit Bond Program - Marveland Crescent Project $22,755.74 HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & NJHMFA -Multi Family variable Rate Bonds -Renewal of Bank of AMerica Liquidity $3,264.00 HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA Facilities - 2008 Series B,C,F and G OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & NJHMFA -Multi-Family Conduit Bond Program; No Brunswick Crescent (Royal $7,060.21 HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA Village) Project OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & NJHMFA Cedarbrook Apartments (#425) - Transfer of Cell Tower Lease 2017 $5,904.00 HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & NJHMFA Conduit Bond Program -Whitlock Mills Project $35,628.09 HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, Brewer, Jeffrey, et al v. Centra State Medical Center, et al $47,126.82 LLC, West Long Branch Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, Garcia, Agustin vs. Correctional Medical Services, et al $27,767.02 LLC, West Long Branch Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, Geiger, Edgar C., III; Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, $3,361.97 LLC, West Long Branch et al Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, Graham, Alquan vs. Ahmar Shakir, D.O., et al. $13,893.51 LLC, West Long Branch Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, Mohamadi, Carmen; Decd, et al v. Rutgers, et al. $3,240.79 LLC, West Long Branch Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, Schroll, Rulla v. Southern Ocean Medical Center, et al. $26,702.52 LLC, West Long Branch Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, Taylor, Shinah vs. Rutgers The State University, et al. $9,191.31 LLC, West Long Branch Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, Vespe, Michael D., et al. vs. Roy Sandau, D.O., et al. $4,557.48 LLC, West Long Branch O'Toole Scrivo Fernandez Weiner Van Harborfields Youth Detention Facility $102,515.50 Lieu, LLC, Cedar Grove Pashman Stein, Hackensack A.M., a minor by her Guardian Jennifer Morales v. State of New Jersey, Division of $11,892.50 Youth and Family Services, et al. Claim# 09-12778 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Bradley C. Peterson v. Administrator Christopher Holmes, et al $106,038.62 Pearlman &Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield NJEDA -Energy Resilience Bank -Cooper University Hospital Financing $19,257.30 Pearlman &Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield NJEDA- Energy Resilience Bank -Template Subrecipient Agreements for Municipal $3,643.00 Utilities Authorities and Sewarage Authorities Post &Schell, PC Crosley, Diane, et al v. Anil K. Nair, M.D., et al $3,000.00 Post &Schell, PC Schenk, Patrick, et al v. Lisa Dertr, DO, et al. $27,217.00 Post &Schell, PC Tereshko, Rochelle vs. Kennedy University Hospital, Inc., et al. $6,692.96 Potters &Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Estate of Frank Lagano v. Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, et al $48,862.00 Potters &Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Rosiland White vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. Docket No.: ESX-L-5893-17 $38,894.34 Potters &Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Yvette Cruz vs. State of NJ, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-1733-15 $133,956.68 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & FMERA -Marina $1,875.00 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law $82.00 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Fitness Center $10,113.30 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Parcel B $12,356.50 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Pinebrook Road Commerce Center $164.00 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Pistol Range $18,904.23 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & FMERA Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Bowling Center $21,544.50 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & FMERA Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Eatontown DPW $10,243.45 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal $27,438.50 Perretti LLP, Morristown Law - F-1 Parcel Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Hicks, Martha v. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections $26,222.50 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & In Re: C.S. $5,995.04 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & In Re: E.R. $1,054.00 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & In re: J.A. $1,224.00 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & In re: R.D. $850.00 Perretti LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Theodore Warfield, Sr. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. MER-L-465-16 $8,525.00 Perretti LLP, Morristown Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Shanahan, Kathleen v. NJT, et al. $51,450.83 Warner Coleman & Goggin Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, 8/19/2016 NJT Two Bus Collision -Request for Pre-Litigation $21,762.88 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Aguilar, Gerald, et al v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $4,113.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Alexander, Wayne vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, et al. $1,744.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Alfieri, Anthony v. NJT $1,139.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Almeida, Antonio, et al v. NJ Transit, et al. $13,673.76 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Alto, Michelle and Carlos Pagan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $1,868.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Amons, Na-Quan vs. University Hospital, et al $696.50 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Anderson, Diana vs. Ana Mendez, et al. $80.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Anthony, Kiliek Dashawn vs. Timothy W. Baptist, et al. $23,259.28 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Aparviz, Gholam vs. N1 Transit Corp., et al. $2,647.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Aranov, Vlad vs. Wilson Herrerra-Perez, et al. $288.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Banks, Bambie J. and Claude Zongo vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc., et $24,116.87 LLP al. Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Beauzil, Anne Marie, et al. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $20,440.48 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Belitzky, David, et al vs. Delka Trucking, Inc., et al. $1,422.96 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Bhalla, Deepti Chanana and Varun Bhalla vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and $14,518.87 LLP Thomas Gallagher Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Biba-Nesimi, Resmie vs. New Jersey Transit Corportation, et al. $2,792.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Biggs, Jonathan, et al. vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al. $3,334.88 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Cabaj, Maria, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al $43,768.83 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Caldwell, Whadoo, Estate of vs Northern State Prison, et al. $17,768.98 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Campbell, Demari vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $8,814.50 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Cerrati, Corinne and Richard Myslinski, h/w; Nicole Safran vs. New Jersey Transit $9,505.32 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Chehade Pierre vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $35,136.37 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Cohen, Susan vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $3,923.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Cohn-Dobkin, Debra vs. New Jersey Transit $19,869.49 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Cordero, Evelyn vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,633.84 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Crespo, Savannah, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $6,440.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Culkin, Frank vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $22,664.52 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, D'Angiolillo, Robert vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $20,530.63 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Daniels-Peters, Robin vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Corporation, Inc. $6,187.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Danley, Elizabeth vs. NJ Transit, et al. $9,880.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Dennis, Robert and Lisa Dennis vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $6,537.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Dertouzos, Claire vs. New Jersey Transit, Inc., et al. $58,944.31 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Dertouzous, Claire vs. New Jersey Transit $7,242.88 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Desai, Samir vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al. $1,536.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Deshong, Shina vs. New Jersey Transit $1,012.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Dopkin, Deborah C. and Mark Dopkin vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $31,573.89 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Dykeman, William v. Abu Ahsan, MD, et al $8,785.74 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Edwards, Urica vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $46,240.85 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Esposito, Dominic v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $34,998.63 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Gelber, Douglas A., et al. vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al. $5,799.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Genovese, Gene vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc $4,942.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Gialamas v. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc. $27,397.20 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Gillespie, Jason and Christina Gillespie vs. Ronald T. Lewis, New Jersey Transit $27,769.06 LLP Corporation Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Gormley, Keri H. vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $13,461.64 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Graber, Staci Ann vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $1,811.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Grice, Montia, et al v. University Hospital, et al. $25,708.85 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Griso, Raven, et al v. Kelka Trucking Inc., et al $862.96 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Grud, Smantha M. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $1,436.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Gsellmeier, Eric vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $7,504.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Guadalupe, Angel; Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et $31,031.20 LLP al. Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Guererra, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $18,262.26 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Guevara-Rodriguez, Franklin vs. James Roberts, et al. $9,055.14 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Henricus, Adrianus Rudolfus vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al $7,781.76 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Hoboken Terminal Rail Accident of 9/29/16 $55,895.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Howard, Anthony v. NJT (R-08424) $16.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Julio Tavarez v. NJ Transit (APPEAL) $1,488.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Kertesz, John and Laverne Maryann Kertesz vs. Consolidated Rail Corporatio, et al $16,706.94 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Kest, Sheldon vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $6,305.99 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Kosich, Natalie; Admin. of Estate of Sergei Kosich, et al v. Hackensack University $18,323.60 LLP Medical Center, et al Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Kozak, Edwin vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $32.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Kozak, et al, Matthew vs. Ana Mendez, et al $23,211.71 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Kucharski, Alan; Estate of, et al. v. Central Railroad of New Jersey, et al. $9,918.02 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Lazar, Roslyn, et a) v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $34,378.61 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Linson, Sean vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and Port Authority of New York & $5,343.50 ALP New Jersey Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Linton, Susan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $20,704.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Lopez, Rosario vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $4,662.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Lucas, Neil John vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,930.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Mahvidi, Ali vs. NJ Transit $4,983.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Martinez, Dilenia vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $2,822.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Mavrovitis, Evan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,586.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, McCall, Tyquan vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $9,857.30 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Meister, Peter H., et a) v. Verizon New Jersey, Inc., et al. $20,171.90 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Michelle McLean vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al $9,147.68 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Miller, Ricky vs. Paul Lagana, et al $25,087.50 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Morales, Viandy vs. Giusepe Nicotra $1,650.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Mulligan, Gregory and Vanessa Mulligan (h/w) vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation $5,505.96 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Murray, Lureene and Nathaniel Brown, her husband vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., $12,721.79 LLP et al. Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Muscianisis, William vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, LLC $3,413.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Neglia, Joseph vs. New Jersey Transit $13,229.96 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Neglia, Joseph, et al. vs. Mayeyu Logistic, LLC, et al. $4,567.35 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, NJ Transit Bus &Garbage Truck Collision $3,388.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Nurge, Kyle vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $32,148.90 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Oriolo, Michael vs. Thomas Gallagher, et al. $1,167.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Oyediran, Shola vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,906.04 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Panebianco, Brian vs. Delka Trucking, Inc., et al. $1,176.96 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Perkins, Rahman vs. Thomas Galagher, et al. $3,522.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Queller, Martin, et al v. Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, et al $10,536.33 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Raybon, Khalilah, et al v. NJ Transit Corp., et al $7,694.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Rhoden, Cordell vs. New Jersey Transit Corproation $20,214.62 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Richards, Denise, et al vs. Michael Smerina, MD, et al $1,695.42 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Ritchwood, Randy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations $28,918.84 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Rodriguez, Noelia vs. NJ Transit, et al. $3,120.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Rojas, Ely vs. New Jersey Transit $7,379.04 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Rollins, Tomikakim, et al v. Tammy Ross-Caffee, et al. $7,042.84 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Rosario, Elisa vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $5,281.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Rovinsky, Steven vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $7,066.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Rozenstein, Stella, et al v. Steven Goldberg, MD, et al. $109,674.47 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Ruberry, Frank vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $4,835.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Saavedra, Marisa and Richard vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al $1,921.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Sapp, Wyatt vs. University Hospital, et al $87,820.46 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Shtarker, Natalya v. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al $1,230.96 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Siev, Justin vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al. $462.96 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Simmons, Robert vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,641.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Singleton, Elijah vs. NJ DOC, et al. $4,855.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Sisco, Nancy, et al v. Chan W. Park, MD, et al. $17,034.18 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Son, Alexander vs. New Jersey Transit $44,248.49 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Stanton, Daniel vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $5,246.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Stritto, Paul Dello v. Eric Lackawanna Railroad, et al. $18,883.54 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Subramaniam, et al, Bagyalakshmi vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit $7,023.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Szumski, Amy;G/A/L, or Isabela Guzman, a minorvs. Abdulla AI-Khan, MD, et al. $30,618.91 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Tavarez, Julio vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $9,470.08 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Thomas, James vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $7,585.92 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Tramontano, Danielle and Lauren Dunham vs. New Jersey Transit Railroad $9,501.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Tramontano, Danielle, et al v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $50,682.27 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Turner, Ruth vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $2,429.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Valente, Justin vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations $5,263.04 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Valoroso, Robert and Kimberly Valoroso, his wife vs. Delks Trucking, Inc., et al. $7,284.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Vanegas, David v. Temporary Guardian of Karen Vanegas v. Roy Palian-DeLacruz, et $5,930.00 LLP al. Claim# 14-9439 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Vinci, Angela vs. Wilson Herrea-Perez, et al. $224.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Ward, Karl and Jaclyn Strassberg (a/k/a Jaclyn Ward) v. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ $4,927.60 LLP Transit, et al Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, West, Thmas vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $35,891.20 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Wojcik, Iwona vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $14,096.25 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Wong-Stewart, Bridgette vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $2,615.00 LLP Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, Yu, Alex, et al vs. Delka Trucking, Inc., et al $1,798.96 LLP Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Beach Condominium v. DEP $15.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Addeo Gina -Block 179.03; Lot 5.02 -Point Pleasant Beach $4,639.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Anita Dietrick -Block 1.01; Lot 1 -Point Pleasant Beach $1,531.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Bay Pointe Dune Homeowners Assoc -Block 179.04; Lots 2, $405.00 3, 4 -Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Bayhead Point Homeowners Assn -Block 179.03; Lot 9 - $6,351.00 Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Bradshaw's Beach Homeowners Assn -Block 17.02; Lots 13, $8,930.00 14 -Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Brod, Craig -Block 179.03; Lot 5.07 -Point Pleasant Beach $2,406.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Carter &Ocean Avenues Sub. Homeowners Assn -Block $210.00 179.04; Lot 5 -Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Connie Coppola and John Zaza -Block 17.02; Lot 1.04 - $195.00 Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Courtney M. Alesso 2012 Trust -Block 13.07; Lot 5 -Point $6,390.00 Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Edward & Mary Jo Nervi, Marianne F. Mongello -Block $113.54 17.02; Lot 7 -Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Elizabeth Carter Assoc, -Block 13.07; Lots 1, 2, 3, 6 -Point $1,069.89 Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Fisher, Steven -Block 179.03; Lot 5.03 -Point Pleasant $2,680.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Girgis, Ihab -Block 179.03; Lot 5.04 -Point Pleasant Beach $3,117.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Gurgo, Michael -Block 13.07; Lot 4 -Point Pleasant Beach $390.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -James Kincade and Lynn Vande Stouwe; Block 17.02, Lot $105.00 2.02 -Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Jenkinsons Pavillion and Jenkinsons South, Inc. v. NJ $465.00 Department of Environmental Protection, et al. Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Kane, William -Block 8; Lot 3 -Point Pleasant Beach $837.12 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Korzeniowski Trust -Block 1.01; Lot 2 -Point Pleasant $1,768.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - La Plante, Dennis -Block 17.02; Lot 1.03 -Point Pleasant $3,210.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Labowsky, Andrew -Block 179.03; Lot 5.09 -Point Pleasant $14,967.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Lee &Carolyn Angioletti -Block 17.02; Lot 12 -Point $495.00 Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Levy, Adam -Block 17.02; Lot 11 -Point Pleasant Beach $501.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Ocean Ventures @Bay Pt Dunes, Inc. -Block 179.03; Lots $51,381.25 5.06, 5.08 -Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Point Beach House, LLC -Block 17.02; Lot 4 -Point Pleasant $90.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Point Pleasant Beach Surf Club -Block 28.02; Lot 2 -Point $1,613.00 Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Poray, Kenneth -Block 17.02; Lot 2.03 -Point Pleasant $375.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Pt. Pleasant Beach $54,295.60 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Rinaolo, Robert -Block 17.02; Lot S -Point Pleasant Beach $30.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Risden's Beach Corp. -Block 46.02; Lots 1, 3 -Point $13,691.21 Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Rogers, Robert -Block 17.02; Lot 2.05 -Point Pleasant $27.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Sarnasi, Charles -Block 17.02; Lot 2.04 -Point Pleasant $45.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -The Ippolito Corp -Block 17.02; Lots 2.01, 3 -Point Pleasant $70.00 Beach (Driftwood Motel) Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -The Ippolito Right of Way, part B. 179.04, Lot 5 $1,080.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Todd Lyons -Block 28.02; Lot 1-Point Pleasant Beach $218.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Van Kralingen Resident Trust II -Block 17.02; Lot 1.01- $427.50 Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold EASEMENT- Beach Condo Association -Point Pleasant Beach Codemnation $1,600.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Korzenowski v. DEP (APPEAL) $135.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Risden's Beach Corp v. DEP $345.00 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Courtney Jackson vs. New Jersey City University, et al. Docket No.: HUD-L-4563-17 $8,470.00 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Diversity Issues $6,129.97 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Leslie, Donna v. State of New Jersey Department of Consumer Affairs, et al. $1,519.32 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Michelle Provenzano vs. Montclair State University, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-758-17 $19,448.27 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Plutarco Flores vs. State of New Jersey, et al Docket No.: MRS-811-16 $62,498.85 Saul Ewing Arnstein &Lehr LLP New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program -New $38,041.18 Harrisburg Hope Village Project Saul Ewing Arnstein &Lehr LLP NJHMFA -Conduit Bond Program - Dalina Manor Project $25,650.00 Harrisburg Saul Ewing Arnstein &Lehr LLP NJHMFA -Conduit Bond Program -Harvard Printing Project $30,134.00 Harrisburg Saul Ewing Arnstein &Lehr LLP NJHMFA -Conduit Bond Program -Washington Street Apts Project $31,984.50 Harrisburg Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Borga, Patrick, an infant, by his guardian ad litem Rachel Prehn and Michael Borga, $5,216.20 Florham Park individually and as his parentws vs. Santiago Caasi, M.D., et al. Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Economidis, Maria vs. Susannah Wise, MD, et al. $2,207.12 Florham Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Estate of Frank Lagano v. State of New Jersey $70,268.32 Florham Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Evans, Lee vs. Newark City, et al. $7,575.60 Florham Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Goodall-Gaillard, Stacey v. Corrections, et al. (Appeal) $13,086.19 Florham Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Goodall-Gaillard, Stacey v. NJDOC, et al. $520.00 Florham Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Kamienski, Paul v. Ocean County Prosecutor's Office, et al. $15,420.22 Florham Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Kent, Ryan vs. St. Peter's University Hospital, et al $41,244.42 Florham Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Materia, Dawn and Nicole French vs. New Jersey Judiciary, et al $76,634.87 Florham Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Newton, Andowah, et al v. Anthony Yang, MD, et al. $37,401.58 Florham Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Peterson, Bradley v. Albert Matlock, et al. $2,380.00 Florham Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Spurgeon, Dwayne vs. A. Narvaze, Corrections Officer, et al. $25,255.59 Florham Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Williams, Brooklyn, an infant by her guardian ad litem, Nicole Williams, et al vs. $17,677.52 Florham Park Karen Koscica, D.O., et al. Sills Cummis &Gross P.C., Newark Lamanteer, Michael v. State of New Jersey, et al. $1,972.00 Sills Cummis &Gross P.C., Newark Municipal Issues Matter $1,537.00 Sills Cummis &Gross P.C., Newark Representation of the State Treasurer - Advice on Challenges to Funding for $1,820.00 Construction Projects Sills Cummis &Gross P.C., Newark Retention for Legal Services for the Administrator of the Department of Law & $42,602.00 Public Safety Regarding the Office of the State Medical Examiner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Advice &Representation in Dispute &Potential Litigation with the National $217,108.36 Washington DC Railroad Passenger Corporation Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Application IRC Provisions. State Pensions Statutes and Unclaimed Property Law to $46,755.00 Washington DC Unclaimed Individual Contributions to State Pension Plans Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Federal Oversight/Inquiries of NJ Transit $176,453.39 Washington DC Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Federal Railroad Administration Inquiries of New Jersey Transit $20,853.00 Washington DC Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Renaissance School Employee Eligibility for State Pension $84,915.00 Washington DC Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Representation with Respect to HUD Housing Assistance Payments RFPS (National $23,755.00 Washington DC &Regional) Stahl & DeLaurentis, P.C., Runnemede Parsell, Lena Administrator, A.A.P. for Anna Krzeminski, Decd vs. Virtua-West $2,280.00 Jersey Health System, Inc., et al. Stahl & DeLaurentis, P.C., Runnemede Young, Nicole vs. Chevalta Bostick-Smith, MD, et al $1,177.00 Strasser &Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Mikaelie Marseille OAL Docket No.: MVH-5555-18 $1,997.30 Strasser &Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Steven Audenried OAL Docket No.: MVH 0622-18 $1,635.00 Strasser &Associates, P.C., Paramus MVC v. Mira Bharatiya $2,019.96 Strasser &Associates, P.C., Paramus MVC v. Robert Nankervis $2,786.94 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Finnemen, Nassir vs. NJ Transit Corporation $832.00 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Richardson, Carlos vs. New Jersey Transit $11,965.46 Volpe and Koenig, PC, Princeton NJT Intellectual Property $48,685.60 Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Glendia Mondesir v. Daniel Hendi, Director & NJ Bar Client Protection Fund $9,693.50 Dicker LLP -New York Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Hoboken Train Crash -Pending Inquiry by the National Transportation Safety Board $55,176.00 Dicker LLP -New York Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, LLP, NJ Transit Corp. Mason Substation Property Dispositions and Matters Related $121,527.08 Madison Thereto $22,293,700.17 OUTSIDE COUNSEL 2019

APPROVED COSTS AS OF MARCH 23, 2019

Law Firm Office Matter Title Amount ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. Bennett, Shareefah N. $135.00 ALOIA LAW FIRM, Bloomfield State of New Jersey v. NJ Transit $3,245.38 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v. Keith McCauley OAL Docket No. : MVH-11516-18 $438.04 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton Motor Vehicle Commission v.Andrew J. Roe, IV OAL Docket No.: MVH-9135-18 $575.56 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. Jackson, Charles $555.00 Anthony J. Apicelli, Jr., LLC, Hamilton MVC v. William Ofosu-Appiah $1,079.76 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Alson Alston vs. National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al. Civil Action# 147-cv- $195.00 4508; CO-AG-17 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Bradley C. Peterson v. Administrator Christopher Holmes, et al $197.62 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Haynes, John Craig vs. Dr. Ihoma Nwachukwi, et al. $12,101.05 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Jackie Alexander, et al v. Detective Miguel Holguin, et a) $120.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Marianito Ruiz v. Correctional Officer Jerry Stretch, et al $9,999.28 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency Multi-Family Conduit Bond $31,175.24 Program -Vista Village Apartments Project ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD NJT Insurance Coverage Issue in Tangia Price, et al. v. NJT $1,917.50 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Scott lonno vs. NJ Department of Corrections, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-437-17 $7,342.00 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Tina Diamond-Ostasz vs. State of New Jersey Department of Education, et al. $10,434.76 Docket No.: BUR-L-682-17 ARCHER & GREINER, HADDONFIELD Victoria Williams-Faux vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1812-16 $6,976.78 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Blackstone Tac Opps Residential Opportunities (post- $4,848.00 closing matters) Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Crayhill Capital Management LP Separate Account (post- $7,440.00 closing transaction) Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - Dyal Capital Partners III, LP (post-closing matters) $768.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment - OZNJ Real Asset Opportunities, LP (post-closing) $912.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Starboard Leaders Fund LP (post-closing matters) $1,824.00 Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Division of Investment -Alternative Investment -Sycamore Partners III, L.P. DOL # $8,880.00 17-64336 (post-closing matters) Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston Investments in Winton Futures Fund, Ltd. $9,168.00 Ballard Spahr LLP -Baltimore State Police Captains Labor Negotiations - STFA $29,281.60 Ballard Spahr LLP -Baltimore State Troopers Fraternal Association, et al. v. State of New Jersey, et al. $165.40 Birchmeier and Powell LLC Tuckahoe Motor Vehicle Commission v. Victor J. Cardin OAL Docket No. : MVH 11511-18 $930.00 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont David Zeiss vs. State of New Jersey, Department of Community Affairs, Division $5,788.58 of Fire &Safety, Glenn Smyth, in his official and individual capacity Docket No.: CPM-L-545-14 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Diane Scott, Phillip Dowdell and Denise Hollingsworth vs. State of New Jersey, et $15,422.39 al. Docket No.: ESX-L-3425-17 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Gary DeMarzo and Samuel Lashman vs. Cape May County Prosecutor, et al. $225,560.45 Docket No.: CPM-L-129-13 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont LaMonica R. Cross vs. State of New Jersey, Office of Attorney General, Division of $4,376.96 Criminal Justice, et al. Docket No.: CAM-L-242-18 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Micaela P. Bennett vs. State of New Jersey, Elizabeth Connolly, Dawn Hall Apgar, $27,657.41 Lynn Kovich, Christina Mongon, Lisa Gaston and Theresa McQuaide Docket No.: MER-L-1774-15 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Michelle Barker vs. The State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1133-16 $13,529.31 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Onslo Rose vs. Rowan University -APPEAL $4,263.96 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Tara Kumor vs. ACRO Service Corporation, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1331-17 $8,591.43 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Tina Young vs. State of New Jersey Docket No.: CPM-L-83-17 $125.00 Brown & Connery, LLP, Westmont Viktoriya Usachenok vs. State of New Jersey Department of the Treasury, et al. $14,200.92 Docket No.: MER-L-1577-17 CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Amalgamated Transit Union, NJ State Joint Council v. NJ TRANSIT; Workers' $2,340.00 LAUREL Compensation Retroactive Claim Amalgamated Transit Union Local 823 v. NJ Transit Bus Co. CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Brooks, Darlene L. vs. Cynthia R.Kern„ et al. $11,291.38 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Clifton Miller vs. State of New Jersey Docket No.: 18-10354 $2,205.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Georandy Johnson v. Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital, et al $23,068.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Giardina v. Barilli $2,480.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Goldstein, Allen and Irene Goldstein vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $640.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Kirchheimer, Stefanie vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al. $16.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Mariano, Maria vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey $800.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Moore, Michael v. State of New Jersey $324.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Peterson, Bradley v. Administrator Christopher Holmes, et al. $990.00 LAUREL CAPEHART & SCATCHARD,P.A., MOUNT Shanahan, Kathleen v. NJT $18,704.02 LAUREL CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & Easement Acquisition -Berkeley Township $16,110.00 AGNELLO Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC, Morristown NJ TRANSIT -EMPLOYMENT COUNSEL HUMAN RESOURCES/POLICIES & $905.00 PROCEDURES Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Garrett Collick, et al v. William Paterson University, et al $10,584.00 Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West L.C. v. MCPO, et al $10,647.95 Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Latimer, Jahmel J., et al. v. Kathleen Waldron, et al. (Wm Paterson Univ) $4,986.80 Orange Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West New Jersey Economic Development Authority -School Facilities Construction $525.00 Orange Bonds -New Jersey Schools Development Authority Proposed Disposition of Passaic Leonard Place Elementary School Parcel Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West New Jersey Economic Development Authority -School Facilities Construction $1,375.00 Orange Bonds -New Jersey Schools Development Authority Proposed Disposition of Mary Costello Elementary School in Gloucester Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority -Federal Highway $40,387.68 Orange Reimbursement Revenue Notes Refunding 2018 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, West Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes Series Fiscal 2019 $21,455.82 Orange DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Alizadeh, Hamid vs. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and NJ $1,255.34 Transit Corp., et al. DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Althea Hylton-Lindsay v. William Paterson University, et al $480.00 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Bojkiu, Serveta, et al v. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $6,036.51 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Carroll, John vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al. $4,965.96 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Colt, Jeffrey and Betsy Tsai vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $6,232.54 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Duminiak, Karla vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, et al. $5,601.22 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Easement Acquisition -Bay Head $12,907.73 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Edwards, Geneithe I. vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc. and Salvatore $725.04 Vicari, Jr. DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Estate of Frank Lagano v. State of New Jersey $27,093.72 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Howard Commons Residential $1,757.52 Transaction DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Lodging Area $1,440.16 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Nurses Quarters $409.20 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law Officer Housing $955.79 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP FMERA -Special Counsel for Municpal Law -Mixed-Use Barker Circle Sale and $965.44 Redevelopment DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Gill, Nia vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $6,227.42 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Jackson-Locklear, Marquesa C., et al. v. William Paterson University, et al. $142,699.38 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Moore, Steven vs. NJ Transit Corp. A/K/A and/or D/B/A "NJ Transit" and/or New $1,376.96 Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc." and Mario Rioja DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Neil Yellin vs. NJ Transit, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-7930-16 $16,112.00 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice Non-Commissioned Officers Association $20,631.76 (CJ Investigators) DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice Superior Officers Association (CJ $19,831.64 Investigators) DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Pramuk, Dylan vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $131.61 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Sirotic, Dean vs. Tutor Perini Corp., et al $432.56 DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick, Cole & Giblin, LLP Sprick, Dennis vs. New Jersey Transit, et al $4,328.83 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Baker, Scott vs. Joy Camarillo, et al. $7,925.21 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Baker,Forrest vs. South Woods State Prison, et al. $2,258.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Cagnina, Anthony vs. Gary Lanigan, et al $2,970.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Kenly, Tyrone vs. Rutgers State University, et al. $5,536.80 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon RODRIGUEZ, HECTOR VS CORRECTIONS, ET AL. $195.00 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Rosenberg, Michael, et al. vs. Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Inc., et al. $2,599.95 Drake Law Firm, P.C., Absecon Vespe, Michael D., et al. vs. Roy Sandau, D.O., et al. $745.00 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Brown, Takeisha; A.A.P., et al vs. Newark Extenden Care Facility, Inc., et al. $1,306.90 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Colantoni, Anthony vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $876.50 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Figatner, Robert vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al.; IMO: $16,513.23 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Renshaw, George, et al v. Robert Weiss, MD, et al $4,704.11 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Lamar, Valarie vs. Jennifer Petrillo, MD, et al. $7,199.49 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Morehead, Desiree vs. Rutgers/RWJMS; IMO: $10,908.14 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Morillo, Amy, et al v. University Hospital, et al. $4,945.50 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Perez, Jose, et al v. Warren A. Chiodo, DPM, et al. $17.66 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Szemple, Craig Francis v. UMDNJ, UCHC, et al $640.00 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Ukawabutu, Rumiejah vs. Dr. Abu Ahsan, et al $1,293.22 Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski, P.C. Visconti, John; Administrator of the Estate of Kristi Lynn Rose Visconti; Decd vs. $4,140.34 Lasanta Horana, MD, et al. Dvorak &Associates, LLC, New Brunswick Mikhaeel, Neveen v. Frederick V. Fitzgerald, et al.; Frederick V. Fitzgerald v. $2,701.70 Robert McNamara, et al. Eckert Seamans Cherin &Mellott, LLC, NJHMFA Georgia King Village Project $37,446.04 Pittsburgh Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Ammar Gadalla and Maria Fatima Gadalla vs. New Jersey Department of $1,440.00 Corrections, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-810-17 Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Jose Rivera vs. New Jersey Transit &James Schworn Docket No.: ESX-L-8621-16 $2,740.00 Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Pia Wilson vs. New Jersey Transit, James Schworn, Anthony Bak, Ed Baksa and $22,390.47 Robert Lavell Docket No.: ESX-L-0094-17 Eric S. Pennington, P.C., South Orange Usama Henien and Estela Euceda v. NJ Department of Corrections Docket No.: $3,075.00 ESX-L-3669-15 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Atzori, Alexander Luca, an infant, et al. vs. Robert Wood Johnson Health System, $30,868.68 et al. Farkas &Donohue, LLC Economidis, Maria vs. Susannah Wise, MD, et al. $4,24.14 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Gold, Daniel vs. Steven Recih, MD, et al $3,865.94 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Johnson, Isaiah, Jr., an infant, et al vs. Owobamoshola Shonowo, MD, et al $8,647.27 Farkas 8c Donohue, LLC Neals, Lionel, et al vs. Mark Adams, MD, et al $3,372.43 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Parra, Maria vs. Steven M. Shulman, MD, et al $965.36 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Perkins, William vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections; Rutgers University $3,676.64 Healthcare Farkas &Donohue, LLC Perren, Michael, et al vs. Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, et al $10,101.89 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Pickard, Lynn; Executrix of David Pickard; Decd vs. Dr. Dale G. Schaar, et al $6,326.65 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Ramirez, Elsa Flores vs. University Hospital, et al. $1,480.51 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Sapp, Wyatt vs. Newark Beth Isrea) Medical Center, et al $45,602.40 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Sisco, Nancy, et al v. Chan W. Park, MD, et al. $56,701.66 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Swackhamer, Richard D., et al v. Kesler Institute for Rehabilitation, et al. $3,072.27 Farkas &Donohue, LLC Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $3,857.20 Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli LLC, Coronet, Edison A. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $192.00 Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli LLC, FMERA Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Allison Hall $1,287.50 Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli LLC, Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority (FMERA) -Special Counsel for $377.50 Phillipsburg Municipal Law -Eatontown Barracks Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli LLC, Galley, Cheryl vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $592.00 Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli LLC, Goodwin, James J. vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al $7,112.51 Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli LLC, LaGuerre, et al, Marie Chantal v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $528.00 Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli LLC, Marchan, Candy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $979.92 Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli LLC, Mayers, Tracy vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $9,335.00 Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli LLC, Odoemene, Emmanuel vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. $1,756.95 Phillipsburg Florio Perrucci Steinhardt &Cappelli LLC, Williams, Ricky vs. New Jersey Transit $9,838.31 Phillipsburg Garrity and Knisely, Boston Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority $3,792.50 Gebhardt &Kiefer, P.C., Clinton Jammie Rutkowitz vs. James Turner, et al. Civil Case No.: 3:17-cv-06622-FLW-TJB $360.00 Gebhardt &Kiefer, P.C., Clinton Nicholas Guidi v. State of New Jersey, et al $14,453.72 Genova Burns LLC, Newark AFSCME (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement $17,460.80 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Ammar Gadalla and Maria Fatima Gadalla vs. New Jersey Department of $625.00 Corrections, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-810-17 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Communications Workers of America -Collectiye Negotiations with CWA for a $47,603.93 Successor Agreement 2019-2023) Genova Burns LLC, Newark CWA (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) $41,448.92 Genova Burns LLC, Newark IBEW Local 30, State Government Management Unit $4,520.33 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Investigation of Claims by Nina Bonner of Violations of the New Jersey $3,180.00 Conscientious Employee Protection Act Genova Burns LLC, Newark Michelle Provenzano vs. Montclair State University, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-758- $4,965.00 17 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Sami Zeidan v. Montclair State University, et al $185.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Usama Henien and Estela Euceda v. NJDOC, et al Docket No.: ESX-L-3669-15 $4,935.00 Genova Burns LLC, Newark Wage Freeze Grievances $320.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark CIR -Committee of Interns and Residents -Union Contract Negotiations $225.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark Council of State Colleges &Universities, AFT AFL/CIO $525.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark CWA Local 1031, Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine (Collective Negotiations $6,080.00 for a Successor Agreement) Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment -Alternative Investment -Aermont Capital Real Estate $39,900.00 Fund IV SCS (initial transaction) Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - GSO Credit - A Partners LP (post-closing) $412.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Division of Investment - GSO Energy Partners - A (LP) (post-closing) $412.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark DOI -Alternative Investment -Hammes Partners III, LP (post-closing) $732.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Health &Professional and Allied Employees {HPAE) -Rowan School of $27,131.09 Osteopathic Medicine (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) Gibbons P.C., Newark Heitman Core Property Fund $1,128.60 Gibbons P.C., Newark International Union of Operating Engineers Local 68 $2,775.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark International Union of Operating Engineers Local 68 at Rowan University -School $400.00 of Osteopathic Medicine (Collective Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit -Operational Advice $750.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corp. -Property Acquisition $3,465.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corporation; NJ TransitGrid $42,595.00 Gibbons P.C., Newark NJ Transit Corporation; Positive Train Control $104,712.50 Gibbons P.C., Newark Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine AAUP (Collective Negotiations fora $12,599.28 Successor Agreement) Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Fraternal Association (STFA) -Collective Negotiations fora $20,025.30 Successor Agreement Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Fraternal Association and State of New Jersey Division of State $125.44 Police -Amended Unfair Practice Charge Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Fraternal Association v. State of New Jersey &Division of State $8,574.31 Police Court Docket#: MER-L-713-18 Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Non-Commissioned Officers Association (STNCOA) -Collective $350.00 Negotiations for a Successor Agreement Gibbons P.C., Newark State Troopers Superior Officers Association (STSOA) -Collective Negotiations for $485.08 a Successor Agreement Gibbons P.C., Newark Teamster Local Union 97 $25,147.98 Gray Miller Persh LLC, Washington NJPBA -FCC Matters, State Treasurer and the NJPBA $2,251.50 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, American Strategic Insurance Corp. vs. Jordyn Massood, et al Docket No.: CAM-L- $100.00 Woodbridge 3427-17 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Centrella, Lorraine, et al. v. Woodbridge Development Center, et al. $950.00 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Christopher Birardi vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections Docket No.: MID-L- $23,415.00 Woodbridge 4193-16 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Concetta Militano a/k/a Connie Militano, et al v. New Jersey Division of Youth & $920.00 Woodbridge Family Services (DYES) a/k/a Division of Child Protection and Permancey (DSPP), et al Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Daniel F. Thornton v. LPS $16,431.18 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Daria Mammen vs. State of NJ Division of State of State Police, et al. Docket No.: $2,710.00 Woodbridge MER-L-128-16 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Doe, John as Parent and Legal Guardian of John Doe, Jr., et al. v. New Jersey $12,840.00 Woodbridge Department of Children &Families, et al. Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Doe, John v. State of New Jersey, et al. $7,598.65 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Escobar, Neomi v. Newark Beth Israel Medical Ctr, et al. $3,622.50 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Glenn, Christina A/K/A Christiana Rezireksyon, et al. v. DCPP, et al. $7,021.00 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Gonzalez, Zenaida, et al. v. State of New Jersey, et al. $12,823.80 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Isabella Basile, et al v. Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital, et al. Docket No.: $5,600.00 Woodbridge MRS-L-768-18 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Jaclyn B. Jiras vs. State of NJ, NJ State Police, Colonel Joseph Fuentes, individually $7,032.48 Woodbridge and in his official capacity and Captain Mark Santiago, individually and in his official capacity Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Jacqueline Hawkins-Stiles, et a) v. DCPP $13,006.00 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Jane Jones v. Pi Kappa Alpha International Fraternity, Inc., et al $2,970.00 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Jermaine Curry and Tori Curry vs. New Jersey State Prison, et al. Docket No.: $17,165.00 Woodbridge MON-L-937-18 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, K.K.G. (formerly K.D.) an infant by her Parents, Andrea Konow-Garretson and $3,200.00 Woodbridge Janet Garretson vs. The State of Nevi Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency ("DCPP) Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Lieutenant Dawn Shyner vs. State of NJ et al. Docket No.: MER-L-2294-16 $4,060.00 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Meg Yatauro vs. Kevin Bolden, et al. Docket No.: CAM-L-1901-14 $6,914.95 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Melanie Wilson vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Civil Action No.: 1:16-cv-07915 $7,278.00 Woodbridge (RBK-JS) Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, New Jersey Economic Development Authority Special Counsel -Technology $540.00 Woodbridge Centre of New Jersey Condominium Project Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Penelope Mauer vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-197-17 $21,797.00 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, R.C. v. DYFS (n/k/a Division of Child Protection &Permanency), et al. $40,963.50 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Stephanie Carter-Green vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-580-15 $33,498.25 Woodbridge Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Terence Smith vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections Docket No.: MID-L- $7,513.00 Woodbridge 1231-17 Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Torres, Stephanie, Parent &Legal Guardian of Amaryllis Gomez v. State of New $4,046.25 Woodbridge Jersey; Department of Children &Families, et al. Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith &Davis LLP, Yvette Gibbons vs. The New Jersey Department of Law &Public Safety, et al. $8,705.00 Woodbridge Docket No.: UNN-L-2766-14 Greenberg Dauber Epstein &Tucker, Charles Ken Zisa v. John Haviland, et al $30,409.00 Newark HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Barbara Kaplan, Block 18.67, Lot 3 -Long Beach Township $2,046.96 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Beach Haven (Bateman) $220.48 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Donald Goldberg; Block 20.87; Lot 4 -Long Beach $240.00 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Jeanette Frankenberg, Block 20.45, Lot 4 -Long Beach $9,632.94 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Joel Golden; Block 20.117; Lot 7 -Long Beach Township $20.40 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - LNM Group, LLC; Block 20.129; Lot 1.10 -Long Beach $5,963.04 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -North Beach, 1003, LLC, Block 18.03, Lot 4 -Long Beach $100.80 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Richard Carolan; Block 20.68; Lot 1 -Long Beach $180.32 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Richard Kowazlski, Block 20.35, Lot 1.04 -Long Beach $1,254.80 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Richard Tavoso -Block 4; Lots 1, 1.01 - Mantoloking Boro $148.16 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Robert Helemian; Block 20.109; Lot 1.04 -Long Beach $60.24 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Shanin Spector; Block 20.89; Lot 5 -Long Beach Township $120.56 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Sheldon Bonovitz, Block 20.03, Lot 4 -long Beach $60.00 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Stonis Family, LLC; Block 20.82; Lot 1 -Long Beach $2,425.72 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Thomas Kline, Block 20.37, Lot 1.05 -Long Beach $135.44 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition - Varunan Sivalingam, Block 18.61, Lot 1.03 -Long Beach $180.64 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -William Mascharka; Block 20.127; Lot 1.03 -Long Beach $201.76 Township HILL WALLACK, Princeton Easement Acquisition -Windmill Properties, Block 79, Lot 1& 2 - Atlantic City $1,761.60 HILL WALLACK, Princeton Mills, Whitlock LL (NJHMFA) $240.72 HILL WALLACK, Princeton NJT -Hoboken Terminal Redevelopment $4,217.20 HILL V1/ALLACK, Princeton Somerville &New Bridge Landing (River Edge) $5,624.40 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Albanese, Vincent John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,743.83 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Arzuaga, Luis v. NJTRO, Inc. $1,963.84 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Beck, James vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,573.80 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Blunt, Jamil vs. New Jersey Tranist, et al. $272.08 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bonelli, Santo vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., et al. $990.16 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Bonsall, William and Sheri Bonsall; his wife vs. State of New Jersey, New Jersey $5,556.48 Transit, et al. Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Buttigieg, John vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,092.60 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Conrad, Steven vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operatins, Inc. $11,919.68 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC D'Amico, Nicole, et al. vs. John E. Mayo, Sr., et al. $646.28 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Ellis, Kenneth vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $9,640.96 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC English, Tamika, Administratrix of the Estate of Herman English, Deceased, et al $65,903.48 v. NJ Transit Corporation, et al. Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Fitzsimmons, Jesse vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $321.04 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Gaspartich, Robert vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,231.54 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Holmes, Sandra vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $800.80 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Jenkins, Jermaine, et al. v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $10,688.24 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Jimenez, Enrique vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,116.14 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Joseph R. Cifaelli vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,178.55 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Kirkland, Kamilah vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $788.16 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Leonard, Brian vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $224.16 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Maher, Terry vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,136.96 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Nanney, Sandra, et al v. NJ Transit Rail Operation, Inc. $258.16 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Powers, Kevin vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,524.30 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Robinson, Caroly vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,835.36 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Smith, Stephanie vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $1,296.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Thomas Dougan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $976.00 Hohn & Scheuerle, LLC Tumfour, Carruthers vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $676.96 Ice Miller LLP New Jersey Department of Education -Pension Tax Advice Regarding $2,747.70 Renaissance Schools Ice Miller LLP NJHMFA -Formation of an OPEB Trust $3,224.25 Ice Miller LlP Special Counsel Designation -State Retirement Plans and State Health Benefit $6,028.20 Plans Ice Miller LLP State Retirement Plans -IRS Audit of Ocean County College $82.35 Ice Miller LLP State Retirement Plans -IRS Audit of Rowan College at Burlington County $27.45 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Brick $625.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Falls LP % Dr. C. Rossakis -Block 4; Lots 8. 8.01 - $555.00 Mantoloking Boro John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Fenelon Properties, Inc. -Block 52.01; Lot 11 -Brick $760.00 Township John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - JC & JMP Spaccarotella -Block 42.03; Lot 1-Brick $585.00 Township John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Joan Dunphy -Block 38, Lot 7 -Brick Township $180.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Mantoloking $585.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Michael Verzaleno Trust -Block 39; Lot 2 -Brick Township $225.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Robert Merrell -Block 46.02; Lot 29.01 -Brick Township $1,410.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition -Ronald O'Malley -Block 58; Lot 6 -Brick Township $105.00 John J. Curley LLC, Jersey City Easement Acquisition - Thoams Mamakos -Block 58; Lot 10 -Brick Township $255.00 John J. Curley LLC,lersey City Easement Acquisition -Thomas Tullo -Block 37, Lot 8 -Brick Township $390.00 John J. Curley LLC,lersey City Harvey Cedars, Borough of v. Harvey and Phyllis Karan, et al. $5,280.00 Kaplan, Kirsch &Rockwell -Denver NJ Transit Corp; County Yard/Delco Lead/Megal Lead Acquisitions, Surface $3,773.00 Transportation Board and Federal Railroad Proceedings and Property Interest Acquisitions Kaplan, Kirsch &Rockwell -Denver NJ Transit Corporation -Gateway Program Financing $15,592.50 Kaplan, Kirsch &Rockwell -Denver Proposed Re-Assignment of Trackage Rights from Norfolk Southern to Dover $4,004.00 Delaware Railroad and Related Surface Transportation Board Issues Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison Motor Vehicle Commission v. Jake B. Pascucci OAL Docket No. : MVH 11517-18 $1,590.00 Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.- njlaws, Edison MVC v. Brian E. Kowasa $1,050.00 Kent &McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry Christopher Triola vs. William Finkle Civil Action No.: 3821-2018 $1,090.00 Hill Kent &McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry State of New Jersey v. Matt Daher $270.00 Hill Kent &McBride, P.C., New Jersey Cherry The Estate of Ernest A. Franciotti, et al v. New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home - $500.00 Hill Vineland, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-460-18 Kutak Rock LLP, Omaha NJT -Retirement and Health &Welfare Plans (Retirement) $9,384.00 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Alexandra M. Bittle vs. Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, Harry Beam Docket No.: BUR- $7,587.38 La m bertviI le L- Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Carol Gorga Williams vs. Linda B. Kenney, et al. Linda B. Kenney, et al v. Peter $2,464.82 Lambertville Garcia, et al. Docket No.: MON-L-202-03 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Erin Shelton vs. State of New Jersey -New Jersey State Police, et al. Docket No.: $8,150.00 Lambertville MER-L-1587-16 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Flavia Stoval, Pro Se vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $1,152.00 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Gerald T. Boswell vs. Office of the Public Defender, et al. Docket No.: MER-L- $460.00 Lambertville 1066-03 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Henien, Usama, et al. v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al. $1,535.00 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., IMO BM, Dept of Law &Public Safety -APPEAL $480.00 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., James Fleming vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: CUM-L-750-17 $5,348.00 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Joan Lombard vs. New Jesrey Department of Transportation Case No.: 1:18-CV- $620.00 Lambertville 01319-RBK-KMW Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Joseph Torres vs. State of New Jersey, et al. Docket No.: MER-L-1859-16 $4,128.00 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Kelcey Burgess vs. State of New Jersey (Department of Environmental Protection $3,056.00 Lambertville and Division of Fish and Wildlife) Docket No.: HNT-L-0205-16 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Marquis Harris vs. New Jersey Department of Human Services, et al. Docket No.: $16,325.35 Lambertville MER-L-0243-16 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Melissa Urban vs. Office of Attorney Ethics of the Supreme Court of New Jersey, $2,210.00 Lambertville et al. Docket No.: MER-L-381-18 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., OSHA Whistleblower Complaint filed by Todd c. Barretta against NJ TRANSIT $560.00 Lambertville Corporation and Steven Santoro, Executive Director under the Federal Railroad Safety Act ("FRSA") Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Ratarsha Willis v. Carl Walker. et al. -APPEAL $300.00 Lambertville Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Sean Tonner vs. New Jersey Department of Corrections and Jerome Scott Docket $8,382.00 Lambertville No.: MID-L-7507-17 Law Office of William P. Flahive, L.L.C., Wahab, Atiya v. State of New Jersey, et al. $2,748.00 Lambertville LeClair Ryan, Richmond Jose Rivera vs. NJ Transit &James Schworn $28,998.96 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Katrina Osborne vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and Kevin Ruff, Individually $9,067.00 and John Does 1-5 Docket No.: ESX-L-2151-15 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Lieb, Drew v. State of New Jersey, Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness $32,721.47 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Marianna Tropeano vs. NJ Transit Police Department, et al. Docket No.: MID-L- $38,964.85 1734-17 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Mildalia Madlinger vs.New Jersey Transit Corporation Docket No.: ESX-L-4844-14 $5,635.00 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Monica Goulbourne vs. New Jersey Veteran's Memorial Home-Paramus Docket $15,163.00 No.: BER-L-2114-16 LeClair Ryan, Richmond Pia Wilson Vs. NJ Transit, et. al $59,698.16 Lenox, Socey, Formidoni, Brown, Giordano, Budden, Christopher L., et al v. William Paul Block, DO, et al $2,285.00 Cooley &Casey, LLC, Lawrenceville Lenox, Socey, Formidoni, Brown, Giordano, Sylla, Kemo; A.A.P., et al vs. Thomas Hegy, MD, et al $420.00 Cooley &Casey, LLC, Lawrenceville Lite DePalma Greenberg Bradley C. Peterson v. Administrator Christopher Holmes, et al $51,623.00 Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Roseland Retention for Legal Services for Administrator of the Department of Law &Public $9,440.00 Safety Regarding the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women Lukas, LaFuria, Gutierrez &Sachs, LLP, NJ Transit's Positive Train Control Project/Radio Frequency Spectrum FCC $2,916.00 McLean Matters Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, Roseland NJT -Acquisition of Portions of Properties Known as One and Two Penn Plaza $22,615.06 East, Newark, NJ (NJT Headquarters), and Matters Related Thereto Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Fetahu, Valdona v. New Jersey Transit Corp. $9,774.00 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Henry, Kathleen vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $7,785.75 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Holmes-Moses, Iraida vs. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey $896.00 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Huerta, Michael A. vs. NJ Transit Corp., et al. $240.00 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Kim, Jung Kui and Won Kim vs. NJ Transit Bus Operations and lusten Oriolo $432.00 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Lan, Mario and Elizabeth Lan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $656.00 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Lee, Vong vs. Justen Oriolo, et a) $272.00 Lynch &Lynch, Garden City Wallace, Karen vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. and Carlos Trujillo $224.00 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program -Grace $25,476.98 West Apartments Project M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - $22,939.47 Manahawkin Family Apartments Project M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program -Villa $25,364.57 Victoria Apartments Project M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange New Jersey Sports &Exposition Authority State Contract Refunding Bonds 2018 $41,500.00 M. Jeremy Ostow, Esq., South Orange NJHMFA - Captial Program Fund Revenue Bonds -Redemption of 2004 and/or $9,977.50 2007 Series Bond MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Bogar, Joseph E. vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et al. $1,475.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Gibbs, Jamal vs. University Correctionl Healthcare, et al. $1,849.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Harris, Fresnel vs. University Hospital, et al. $744.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Jackson, Michele; Guardian, et al v. University Hospital, et al. $1,530.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Johnson, Shyemah vs. University Hospital; IMO: $516.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Kisby, Jessica vs. NJ DOC, et al. $1,325.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Lombardi, Christopher; Decd vs. Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, et al $510.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Neals, Lionel, et al vs. Mark Adams, MD, et al. $6,299.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill ~c Riveles, LIC, Cedar Onyekaomelu, Peter and Kamilah vs. UMDNJ, et al (appeal) $1,725.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Rouse, Terry C. vs. Sgt. Starks, et al $3,197.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Samia-Sabahia, Rachel; a/k/a Baby Lo Gatto vs. Andrew Rubenstein, MD, et al. $603.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Sleiman, Helena; Executrix of the Estate of Antoine Sleiman; Decd vs. Michael $1,496.00 Knolls Piscopiello, MD, et al. MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Suriano, Immacolata; Decd, et al v. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, et $1,948.00 Knolls al. MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Sutherland, Vanessa vs. Andrei Botea, MD, et al $4,490.13 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Ventura, Henry, Estate of, et al vs. Rutgers University, et al; IMO $17,951.00 Knolls MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Vervan, Joseph, representative of Nancy Vervan; Decd vs. University Hospital, et $480.00 Knolls al MacNeill, O'Neill & Riveles, LLC, Cedar Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $2,354.00 Knolls Marino, Tortorella &Boyle, P.C., Chatham State of New Jersey v. Christopher J. Christie $8,890.00 McCarter &English, LLP, Newark New New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority -Revisions to Post-Issuance Tax $2,928.50 Jersey Compliance Procedures 2018 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter Anderson, George III, v. NJDMAVA, et al. $46,529.60 LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter Clarification of Unit Petitions - Group Y $4,520.00 LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter CNJSCL AFT-CIO -Faculty/Professional Staff Unit (Collective Negotiations fora $425.00 LLP, Morristown NJ Successor Agreement McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter Crus, Israel vs. Leamon McKenzie, et al $4,000.24 LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter Jenkins, Leslie E. v. Montclair State University, et al. $12,147.72 LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter Negotiations between the New Jersey Transit Police Department and the $2,390.00 LLP, Morristown NJ Fraternal Order of Police, Local 37 related to the collective bargaining agreement McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter NJ Transit Corporation -Labor Counsel -Amalgamated Transit Union Contracts $1,350.00 LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter Peoples, Christine v. Montclair State University $220.00 LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter Robinson, Raphael, et al v. new Jersey Transit Rail Operaions, Inc. $1,623.68 LLP, Morristown NJ McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter TANGIA PRICE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, JAMES SCHWORN, PAUL KELLY and JOHN $139,219.49 LLP, Morristown NJ WASILAK, McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter Tietze, Deborah v. New Jersey Pinelands Commission $123,328.80 LLP, Morristown N1 McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney &Carpenter Villapando, Maurine A. v. Raritan Bay Medical Center, et al. $5,847.52 LLP, Morristown NJ McGivney & Kluger, PC, Florham Park Belfand, Seman vs. Raymond Petosa and New Jersey Transit Corporation, C- $240.00 83585-444 McKool Smith, Dallas NJT v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, et al. $244.50 McManimon, Scotland &Baumann, L.L.C., New Jersey Transit Corporation -Extension of Federally Taxable Grant $5,332.50 Roseland Anticipation Note, Series 2015 Revolving Credit Agreement McManimon, Scotland &Baumann, L.L.C., New Jersey Transit-Gateway Program Project $26,512.50 Roseland McManimon, Scotland &Baumann, L.L.C., NJ Higher Education Student Assistance Authority 2018 Series Bonds $741.78 Roseland Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Aly, Angie vs. John Wessel, et al $25,114.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Barnieh, Justin; an infant; the Estate of: IMO: $2,560.70 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Deshefy, Jeffrey R. Jr., et al v. Michael G. Nosko, MD, et al $5,818.05 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Feltynowski, Kelly A. vs. Andrew G. Kaufman, MD, et al. $4,889.33 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Geiger, Edgar C., III; Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, $3,065.00 et al Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Jill Goldstein, et al v. New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home -Paramus, et al. $6,565.51 Docket No.: BER-L-4839-18 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Kadonsky, Steven vs. Abu Ahsan, MD, et al $260.00 Michael 1. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Mcfeeley, William, et al vs. Sunny Kar, D.O., et al. $10,310.06 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park McNellis-Wallace, Eileen, et al v. Anthony Salerno, MD, et al. $960.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Nassis, Joanne vs. Hetal Gor, MD, et al $3,617.44 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Roxas, Estate of Salvatoris vs. University Hospital, et al; IMO: $640.00 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Sherry Leaks, et al v. New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home Menlo Park, et al. $6,843.55 Docket No.: MID-L-2506-18 Michael J. Lunga, Esq., LLC, Florham Park Ward, Rashawn vs. State of New Jersey, et al. $1,140.00 Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and New Jersey Investigators Association, Lodge 174 (Collective Negotiations fora $39.35 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Successor Agreement) Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and New Jersey Law Enforcement Commanding Officers Association (Collective $19,813.98 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Negotiations for a Successor Agreement) Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and New Jersey Law Enforcement Supervisors Association (Collective Negotiations for $16,393.04 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia a Successor Agreement) Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and New Jersey Superior Officers Law Enforcement Unit (Collective Negotiations fora $1,175.00 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Successor Agreement) Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and PBA 105 (Collective Negotiation for a Successor Agreement) $3,850.00 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Retention for Legal Services for Administrator of the Department of Law &Public $12,044.64 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Safety Regarding the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and State PBA, State Law Enforcement Unit (Collective Negotiations for a Successor $13,852.47 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Agreement) Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Toolen, William, et al. v. State of New Jersey $26,749.68 Rhoads, LLP, Philadelphia Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Bruce Skoorka v. Kean University, et al $2,208.50 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Efthimia N. Christie, ED.D vs. Kean University, et al. Docket No.: UNN-L-739-17 $8,403.04 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Juan Daniel Perez vs. New Jersey City University, et al. Docket No.: HUD-L-1845- $309.00 14 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Julienne Whitten vs. Kean University, et al. Docket No.: MID-L-6549-17 $6,705.36 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Karen Shanks vs. Newark Public Schools, et al. Docket No.: UNN-L-3016-15 $320.00 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Lavern Sanders vs. Division of Children and Family Services, et al. Docket No.: $7,595.16 HUD-L-1533-16 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Linda Lockard-Phillips vs. State of New Jersey Claim Petition Numbers: 2015-4970 $1,380.48 & 2015-4972 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Monica Miller v. NJDOC Docket No.: ESX-L-4170-14 Docket No.: ESX-L-4170-14 $4,047.36 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Rose Richardson v. State of NJ, Office of the Attorney General $5,903.00 Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Smith, Diamond, Estate of, et al. v. State of New Jersey, Division of Child $3,160.28 Protection &Permanency, et al. Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, Livingston Triebe, Robert v. State of NJ, et al. $4,891.80 Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Anthony Desantis vs. New Jersey Transt, et al. Docket No.: 14-3578 $2,460.00 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Brian Weimer vs. Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, et al. Docket No.: ATL-L-2399-17 $1,660.00 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Bricker, Barbara, et al. v. Kennedy Health System, et al $861.87 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey DiNapoli, Jill vs. Anthony Salerno, M.D. $12,037.24 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Doglio, Jaime A., et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson Medical Group, et al. $5,164.00 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Economidis, Maria vs. Susannah Wise, MD, et al. $2,120.00 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Gueye, Lateefah; F/K/A; Lateefah Whitfield; Guardian of Trevohn Kyree Sterling; $13,831.59 Warner Coleman & Goggin an infant vs. William Scorza, et al Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Johnstone, John L., A.A.P., et al vs. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, Inc., et al $568.16 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Keith Stopko vs. New Jersey Attorney General, et al. $280.00 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Maronski, Walter, et al v. Kennedy Health System, Inc., et al $2,851.50 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Morales, Maria, et al v. Gregory Peck, DO, et al $540.00 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Nicole DeBiase v. NJTransit $52,981.00 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Redmond, Phillip A., II vs. Virtua West Jersey Health System, et al. $3,789.75 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Rosu, Dylan vs. Atlanticare Regional Medical Center City Campus, et al; IMO $195.00 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Salvemini, Mauro, et al v. Naieml Nassiri, MD, et al $210.00 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Semmon, Ebony; A.A.P., et al vs. University Correctional Health Care, et al. $280.00 Warner Coleman & Goggin Mount Laurel- MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Verdi, Shannon &Ralph vs. Anthony P. Salerno, MD, et al. $1,078.18 Warner Coleman & Goggin Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - CVC Capital Partners VII, L.P. $23,275.00 (initial transaction) Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Division of Investment -Alternative Investment - CVC Capital Partners VII, L.P. $3,182.50 (post-closing) Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI -Alternative Investment -The Rise Fund -Initial Transaction $6,032.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI -Alternative Investment -The Rise Fund -Post-Closing Matters $237.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco DOI -Alternative Investment - TPG Growth IV, LP -Initial Transaction $6,507.50 Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco Special Counsel Designation -State of New Jersey, Department of Treasury, $55,515.00 Appointment as Disclosure Counsel O'Toole Scrivo Fernandez Weiner Van Lieu, Harborfields Youth Detention Facility $5,811.50 LLC, Cedar Grove O~Brien &Ryan, LLP Kelly, John J.; Decd, et al vs. Lourdes Health System, et al $11,902.80 O~Brien &Ryan, LLP Mills, Dawn, et al. vs. Kennedy Memorial Hospital-Stratford Division, et al $13,626.05 O~Brien &Ryan, LLP Nock, Tyronne; Administrator of the Estate of Adrienne Nock; Decd vs. Kennedy $4,235.40 Memorial Hospital-Washington Twp., et al O~Brien &Ryan, LLP Pollitt-Milcarek, Regina, Michael Milcarek (w/h) vs. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical $10,796.83 Center, Inc., et al. O~Brien &Ryan, LLP Sinnes, Keri, et al vs. Kennedy Health System, et al $6,514.52 O~Brien &Ryan, LLP Welch, Kathleen, et al v. Kennedy University Hospital, Inc., et al. $2,974.32 OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & NJHMFA -Garden Spires Project $35,713.13 HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA OBERMAYER RE~MANN MAXWELL & NJHMFA -Spruce Spires Project $35,582.61 HIPPEL LLP, PHILADELPHIA Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, LLC, Brewer, Jeffrey, et al v. Centra State Medical Center, et al $16,128.92 West Long Branch Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, LLC, Garcia, Agustin vs. Correctional Medical Services, et al $3,977.46 West Long Branch Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, LLC, Johnson, Isaiah, Jr., an infant, et al vs. Owobamoshola Shonowo, MD, et al $1,739.37 West Long Branch Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, LLC, Ramirez, Elsa Flores vs. Rutgers Medical School, et al. $660.00 West Long Branch Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff ~ Conlon, LLC, Vespe, Michael D., et al. vs. Roy Sandau, D.O., et al. $1,207.38 West Long Branch Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff &Conlon, LLC, Yetman, Walter; Administrator, et al vs. University Medical Center of Princeton $4,439.00 West Long Branch at Plainsboro, et al Pashman Stein, Hackensack A.M., a minor by her Guardian Jennifer Morales v. State of New Jersey, Division $9,648.70 of Youth and Family Services, et al. Claim# 09-12778 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Bartel, Lauren Roxaya vs. Carlos F. Caballero and NJ Transit Corp. $133.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack D.R. vs. DCF, et al Docket No.: HUD-L-3423-16 $2,307.50 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Gonzalez, Humberto vs. Donald E. Williamson, Jr., et al. $448.00 Pashman Stein, Hackensack Ortiz, Nicolas vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., eta) $4,206.70 Pearlman &Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield New Jersey Economic Development Authority -Energy Resilience Bank - RWJ $10,671.50 Barnabas Health Medical Center Financing 2018 Pearlman &Miranda, LLC, Bloomfield NJEDA -Energy Resilience Bank -South Monmouth Regional Sewerage Authority $19,171.44 Financing Post &Schell, PC Schenk, Patrick, et al v. Lisa Dertr, DO, et al. $9,903.00 Post &Schell, PC Tereshko, Rochelle vs. Kennedy University Hospital, Inc., et al. $4,745.90 Potters &Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Estate of Frank Lagano v. Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, et al $11,834.00 Potters &Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Rosiland White vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. Docket No.: ESX-L-5893-17 $3,015.00 Potters &Della Pietra LLP, Fairfield Yvette Cruz vs. State of NJ, et al. Docket No.: MRS-L-1733-15 $15,128.99 Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law - Parcel B $697.00 LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti FMERA -Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Pistol Range $5,207.00 LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti FMERA Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Bowling Center $492.00 LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti FMERA Special Counsel for Municipal Law -Eatontown DPW $1,496.50 LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority Special Counsel for Municipal $6,560.00 LLP, Morristown Law - F-1 Parcel Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti Hicks, Martha v. State of New Jersey Department of Corrections $4,785.00 LLP, Morristown Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti Theodore Warfield, Sr. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. MER-L-465-16 $25,623.00 LLP, Morristown Roseland MDWCG Marshall Dennehey Shanahan, Kathleen v. NJT, et al. $20,661.20 Warner Coleman & Goggin Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP 8/19/2016 NJT Two Bus Collision -Request for Pre-Litigation $9,302.40 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Aguilar, Gerald, et a) v. NJ Transit Corp. D/B/A NJ Transit $2,801.75 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Alto, Michelle and Carlos Pagan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $768.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Anthony, Kiliek Dashawn vs. Timothy W. Baptist, et al. $16,976.35 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Baker, Ralph vs. Paul Fishman, et al. $4,976.58 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Banks, Bambie J. and Claude Zongo vs. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc., $3,000.80 et al. Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Beauzil, Anne Marie, et al. vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $368.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Bhalla, Deepti Chanana and Varun Bhalla vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and $5,326.00 Thomas Gallagher Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Biba-Nesimi, Resmie vs. New Jersey Transit Corportation, et al. $4,061.96 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cabaj, Maria, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al $8,729.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Campbell, Demari vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $5,906.24 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cerrati, Corinne and Richard Myslinski, h/w; Nicole Safran vs. New Jersey Transit $7,345.25 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Chehade Pierre vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,298.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cohen, Susan vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $4,077.68 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Cordero, Evelyn vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $2,653.45 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Crespo, Savannah, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $3,350.06 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Culkin, Frank vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $9,861.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP D'Angiolillo, Robert vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $8,080.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Daniels-Peters, Robin vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Corporation, Inc. $2,157.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Dertouzos, Claire vs. New Jersey Transit, Inc., et al. $8,979.88 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Desai, Samir vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al. $896.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Deshong, Shina vs. New Jersey Transit $1,664.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Domino, Ahmad vs. University Hospital, et al $2,482.32 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Dopkin, Deborah C. and Mark Dopkin vs. N1 Transit Corp., et al. $10,480.94 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Edwards, Urica vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $701.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP ~ Esposito, Dominic v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $608.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gelber, Douglas A., et al. vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al. $9,402.53 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Genovese, Gene vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc $7,065.96 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gialamas v. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc. $1,784.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gillespie, Jason and Christina Gillespie vs. Ronald T. Lewis, New Jersey Transit $15,598.51 Corporation Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gormley, Keri H. vs. New Jersey Transit, et al. $4,065,00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Graber, Staci Ann vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $5,026.30 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Grice, Montia, et al v. University Hospital, et al. $21,630.89 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Griso, Raven, et al v. Kelka Trucking Inc., et al $424.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Grud, Smantha M. vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. $165.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Gsellmeier, Eric vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $208.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guadalupe, Angel; Estate of, et al vs. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, $33,747.50 et al. Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guererra, Michael vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $4,750.44 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Guevara-Rodriguez, Franklin vs. James Roberts, et al. $5,768.22 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Henricus, Adrianus Rudolfus vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al $336.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Julio Tavarez v. NJ Transit (APPEAL) $208.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kertesz, John and Laverne Maryann Kertesz vs. Consolidated Rail Corporatio, et $10,600.00 al Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kest, Sheldon vs. New Jersey Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $2,789.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kosich, Natalie; Admin. of Estate of Sergei Kosich, et al v. Hackensack University $2,105.00 Medical Center, et al Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kozak, et al, Matthew vs. Ana Mendez, et al $8,169.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Kozak, Jr., Edwin vs. Ana Mendez, et al. $3,488.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Lazar, Roslyn, et al v. New Jersey Transit, et al. $160.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Linson, Sean vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation and Port Authority of New York $234.00 & New Jersey Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Linton, Susan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $2,576.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Lopez, Rosario vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $2,030.89 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Lucas, Neil John vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $325.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mahvidi, Ali vs. NJ Transit $5,114.75 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mavrovitis, Evan vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $3,016.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Meister, Peter H., et al v. Verizon New Jersey, Inc., et al. $2,616.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Michelle McLean vs. NJ Transit Corporation, et al $6,413.98 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Miller, Ricky vs. Paul Lagana, et al $2,702.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Morales, Viandy vs. Giusepe Nicotra $1,168.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Mulligan, Gregory and Vanessa Mulligan (h/w) vs. New Jersey Transit $3,243.50 Corporation Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Murray, Lureene and Nathaniel Brown, her husband vs. New Jersey Transit Corp., $17,093.50 et al. Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Muscianisis, William vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, LLC $1,184.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Neglia, Joseph, et al. vs. Mayeyu Logistic, LLC, et al. $4,863.04 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP NJ Transit Bus &Garbage Truck Collision $752.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Nurge, Kyle vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $6,784.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Oriolo, Michael vs. Thomas Gallagher, et al. $367.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Perkins, Rahman vs. Thomas Galagher, et al. $544.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Queller, Martin, et al v. Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, et al $145.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Raybon, Khalilah, et al v. NJ Transit Corp., et al $2,130.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rhoden, Cordell vs. New Jersey Transit Corproation $8,965.61 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Richards, Denise, et al vs. Michael Smerina, MD, et al $219.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rodriguez, Noelia vs. NJ Transit, et al. $1,850.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rojas, Ely vs. New Jersey Transit $1,168.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Rovinsky, Steven vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit, et al. $645.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Saavedra, Marisa and Richard vs. Wilson Herrera-Perez, et al $831.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sabat, Allan vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,054.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Sapp, Wyatt vs. University Hospital, et a) $16,913.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Simmons, Robert vs. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $3,056.15 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Singleton, Elijah vs. NJ DOC, et al. $1,722.12 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Stanton, Daniel vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $377.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Stritto, Paul Dello v. Eric Lackawanna Railroad, et al. $17,763.98 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Subramaniam, et al, Bagyalakshmi vs. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ Transit $464.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Szumski, Amy;G/A/L, or Isabela Guzman, a minor vs. Abdulla AI-Khan, MD, et al. $14,474.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Tramontano, Danielle and Lauren Dunham vs. New Jersey Transit Railroad $5,410.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Tramontano, Danielle, et al v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. $10,942.50 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Turner, Ruth vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $293.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Valente, Justin vs. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations $717.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Valoroso, Robert and Kimberly Valoroso, his wife vs. Delks Trucking, Inc., et al. $3,078.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Ward, Karl and Jaclyn Strassberg (a/k/a Jaclyn Ward) v. NJ Transit Corp. d/b/a NJ $1,077.00 Transit, et al Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Wojcik, Iwona vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al. $256.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Wong-Stewart, Bridgette vs. New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al $373.00 Ruprecht, Hart Weeks & Ricciardulli, LLP Yu, Alex, et al vs. Delka Trucking, Inc., et al $848.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - 1402 Ocean Partnership Limited Liability Company -Block $138.00 17.02; Lot 9.00 -Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Addeo Gina -Block 179.03; Lot 5.02 -Point Pleasant $1,773.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Connie Coppola and John Zaza -Block 17.02; Lot 1.04 - $390.00 Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Courtney M. Alesso 2012 Trust -Block 13.07; Lot 5 -Point $1,305.00 Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Fisher, Steven -Block 179.03; Lot 5.03 -Point Pleasant $75.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Girgis, Ihab -Block 179.03; Lot 5.04 -Point Pleasant Beach $2,190.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -James Kincade and Lynn Vande Stouwe; Block 17.02, Lot $327.00 2.02 -Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - La Plante, Dennis -Block 17.02; Lot 1.03 -Point Pleasant $540.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Labowsky, Andrew -Block 179.03; Lot 5.09 -Point $720.00 Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Ocean Ventures @Bay Pt Dunes, Inc. -Block 179.03; Lots $64,068.05 5.06, 5.08 -Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Pt. Pleasant Beach $7,190.00 Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Risden's Beach Corp. -Block 46.02; Lots 1, 3 -Point $1,145.00 Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition - Sarnasi, Charles -Block 17.02; Lot 2.04 -Point Pleasant $63.00 Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold Easement Acquisition -Van Kralingen Resident Trust II -Block 17.02; Lot 1.01 - $4,305.00 Point Pleasant Beach Rutter &Roy, LLP, Freehold EASEMENT- Beach Condo Association -Point Pleasant Beach Codemnation $150.00 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Courtney Jackson vs. New Jersey City University, et al. Docket No.: HUD-L-4563- $43,980.96 17 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Michelle Provenzano vs. Montclair State University, et al. Docket No.: ESX-L-758- $1,300.00 17 Saiber, LLC, Florham Park Plutarco Flores vs. State of New Jersey, et al Docket No.: MRS-811-16 $32,207.11 Saul Ewing Arnstein &Lehr LLP Harrisburg New Jersey Housing &Mortgage Finance Agency Conduit Bond Program - $30,310.66 Heritage Village at Galloway Project Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Florham Borga, Patrick, an infant, by his guardian ad litem Rachel Prehn and Michael $2,455.00 Park Borga, individually and as his parentws vs. Santiago Caasi, M.D., et al. Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Florham Economidis, Maria vs. Susannah Wise, MD, et al. $802.16 Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Florham Estate of Frank Lagano v. State of New Jersey $32,044.42 Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Florham Evans, Lee vs. Newark City, et al. $320.16 Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Florham Kamienski, Paul v. Ocean County Prosecutor's Office, et al. $1,340.00 Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Florham Kent, Ryan vs. St. Peter's University Hospital, et al $2,805.79 Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Florham Newton, Andowah, et al v. Anthony Yang, MD, et al. $4,596.18 Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Florham Spurgeon, Dwayne vs. A. Narvaze, Corrections Officer, et al. $615.56 Park Schenck, Price, Smith &King, LLP, Florham Williams, Brooklyn, an infant by her guardian ad litem, Nicole Williams, et al vs. $6,182.20 Park Karen Koscica, D.O., et al. Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Washington Federal Oversight/Inquiries of NJ Transit $3,841.00 DC Strasser &Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Dalton Garr OAL Docket No. : MVH 13517-18 $585.00 Strasser &Associates, P.C., Paramus Motor Vehicle Commission v. Steven Audenried OAL Docket No.: MVH 0622-18 $1,364.30 Stroz Friedberg, LLC, New York In Re: C.S. $14,352.30 Swartz Campbell LLC Phila PA Finnemen, Nassir vs. N1 Transit Corporation $956.00 Volpe and Koenig, PC, Princeton NJT Intellectual Property $6,125.00 Total $4,597,392.83 PENDING CONTINGENCY FEE MATTERS

Case Firm Year Costs Approved Costs Approved Retained 2018 2019 Credit Suisse Lowenstein Sandler 2018 none none Grewal v. Janssen Pharmaceutical Cohen Milstein Sellers &Toll PLLC 2018 none none Grewal v. Purdue Pharma, LLC Cohen Milstein Sellers &Toll PLLC 2017 none none Baron &Budd, PC.; Grant & Eisenhofer, 2019 none none PA; Hagens, Berman, Sobel Shapiro, LLP; McManimon Scotland NJDEP v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co Kelley Drye &Warren LLP; Cohn Lifland 2019 none none (Chambers Works) Pearlman, Herrmann &Knopf, LLP; Law Office of John K. Dema, PC. NJDEP v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co Kelley Drye &Warren LLP; Cohn Lifland 2019 none none (Partin) Pearlman, Herrmann &Knopf, LLP; Law Office of John K. Dema, PC. NJDEP v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co Kelley Drye &Warren LLP; Cohn Lifland 2019 none none (Pompton Lakes) Pearlman, Herrmann &Knopf, LLP; Law Office of John K. Dema, PC. NJDEP v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co Kelley Drye &Warren LLP; Cohn Lifland 2019 none none (Repauno) Pearlman, Herrmann &Knopf, LLP; Law Office of John K. C~ema, PC. NJ DEP v. Deull Fuel Co Locks Law Firm; The Lanier Law Firm, PC; 2018 none none Sanders Phillips Grossman, LLC; Keefe Law Firm NJ DEP v. Hess Kanner &Whitely 2018 none none NJ DEP v. ExxonMobil Corp (Lail) Kanner &Whitely 2019 none none NJ DEP v. Atlantic Richfield, et al. (MTBE Miller & Axline, P.C.; Cohn Lifland 2007 none none Litigation) (remaining defendants include: Pearlman, Herrmann &Knopf, LLP; Law ExxonMobil; Getty, and Gulf/Cumberland Office of John K. Dema, PC.; Berger Farms Inc.) Montague, PC

NJ DEP v. Atlantic Richfield, et al. (MTBE Miller & Axline, P.C.; Cohn Lifland 2007 $12.8M matter settled Litigation) (Shell defendants) Pearlman, Herrmann &Knopf, LLP; Law in 2018 Office of John K. Dema, PC.; Berger Montague, PC

Division of Investments v. Trinity Lowenstein Sandler; Litowitz Berger & 2015 none none Grossman DRE DATA 2014 - 2018

Year Total Evaluations Evidential Evaluations Total DRE Experts Tota) NJSP DRE Experts %Change of # of DREs

2014 1486 1224 387 105 N/A

2015 1364 1143 382 115 -1.29

2016 1875 1589 426 115 11.52

2017 2523 2125 465 122 9.15

2018 2492 1970 488 130 5.59

2019 (As of 3/23/19) 519 135 5.7

2014 - 2019 is 34.11