Humanitarian Coordination: Lessons from Recent Field Experience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Humanitarian Coordination: Lessons from Recent Field Experience Humanitarian Coordination: Lessons from Recent Field Experience A study commissioned by the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) June 2001 Nicola Reindorp and Peter Wiles Overseas Development Institute London Humanitarian Coordination: Lessons from Recent Field Experience CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................i SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Objectives and Scope of the Study ....................................................................................................1 1.3 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................2 1.4 Structure .............................................................................................................................................3 SECTION 2: COORDINATION: AN OVERVIEW ....................................................................................4 2.1 Historical Overview .............................................................................................................................4 2.2 Defining Coordination .........................................................................................................................5 2.3 The Parameters of the Coordination Debate in the UN ......................................................................6 2.4 The Challenges of a Changing Context..............................................................................................6 SECTION 3: OBSTACLES AND INCENTIVES TO COORDINATION....................................................8 3.1 Overview.............................................................................................................................................8 3.2 The Obstacles to Coordination ...........................................................................................................9 3.3 So When Does Coordination Happen?.............................................................................................13 3.4 The Ingredients of Success .............................................................................................................13 3.5 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................18 SECTION 4: THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF COORDINATION MODELS.............19 4.1 Do the UN Models Matter? ...............................................................................................................19 4.2 The Resident/Humanitarian Coordinator: the ‘Combined Model’ .....................................................19 4.3 The Humanitarian Coordinator Separate from the Resident Coordinator.........................................20 4.4 The Lead Agency Model...................................................................................................................21 4.5 Conclusion: So Who Should Coordinate? ........................................................................................22 SECTION 5: HOW COORDINATION GETS DONE ..............................................................................24 5.1 Coordinating Integrated Responses: Tasks and Techniques ...........................................................24 5.2 Facilitating Collaboration: Tasks and Services .................................................................................32 5.3 Tools and Structures.........................................................................................................................37 5.4 Conclusion........................................................................................................................................42 SECTION 6: LIAISING WITH MILITARY AND POLITICAL ACTORS .................................................43 6.1 The Drive for Coherence and the View from the Ground ................................................................43 6.2 Views in the UN Secretariat .............................................................................................................44 6.3 The Role of the SRSG ......................................................................................................................44 6.4 Coherence and the Brahimi Report ..................................................................................................45 6.5 The Potential Divisions Among the Humanitarians ..........................................................................45 6.6 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................45 SECTION 7: OCHA'S ROLE..................................................................................................................47 7.1 The Successes .................................................................................................................................47 7.2 The Failures......................................................................................................................................47 7.3 The Threats to Change.....................................................................................................................47 7.4 Conclusion: The Challenges.............................................................................................................48 SECTION 8: CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................50 8.1 The Obstacles and Incentives to Change ........................................................................................50 8.2 The Options for Change ...................................................................................................................50 8.3 The Role of UN Member States and Donors ....................................................................................52 8.4 The Role of the Secretary-General...................................................................................................52 8.5 Consolidated Recommendations .....................................................................................................52 ANNEXES: 1: ToR, 2: Matrix of Coordination Arrangements, 3: DRC Case Study, 4: Somalia Case Study, 5a: Kosovo Case Study, 5b: FRY Case Study, 6: List of Interviewees SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................85 Humanitarian Coordination: Lessons from Recent Field Experience LIST OF ACRONYMS ACABQ Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (UN) ACF Action contre la Faim ALNAP Active Learning Network on Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Assistance CAP Consolidated Appeal Process CCA Common Country Assessment CERF Central Emergency Revolving Fund CHAP Common Humanitarian Action Plan CIMIC Civil-Military Cooperation Commission CRS Catholic Relief Services DDR Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration DEC Disasters Emergency Committee DFID Department for International Development DHA Department of Humanitarian Affairs DPA Department of Political Affairs (UN) DPKO Department of Peacekeeping Operations (UN) DRC Democratic Republic of Congo DSRSG Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General EC European Commission ECHA Executive Committee for Humanitarian Affairs ECHO European Community Humanitarian Office ECOSOC Economic and Social Council ECPS Executive Committee on Peace and Security EHI Emergency Humanitarian Initiative EMG Emergency Management Group ERC Emergency Relief Coordinator EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation (UN) FCU Field Coordination Unit FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia FSAU Food Security Assessment Unit GIS Geographic Information System GIST Geographic Information Systems Team HC Humanitarian Coordinator HCIC Humanitarian Community Information Centre HIS Health Information System HLO Humanitarian Liaison Officers HPG Humanitarian Policy Group HPN Humanitarian Practice Network IACU Inter-Agency Coordination Unit IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross ICVA International Council of Voluntary Agencies IDPs Internally Displaced People IFRC International Federation of the Red Cross IOM International Organisation for Migration INGO International Non-Governmental Organisation IRIN Integrated Regional Information Network JIAS Joint Interim Administrative Structure KFOR Kosovo Force MONUC United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo MoU Memoranda of Understanding MOVCON Movement Control Centres MSF Médicins Sans Frontières NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation NGO Non-Governmental Organisation Humanitarian Coordination: Lessons from Recent Field Experience OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs ODI Overseas Development Institute OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OED Office of the Executive Delegate OEOA Office for Emergency Operations in Africa OFDA US Office for Foreign Disaster Assistance OSCE Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe
Recommended publications
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/27/2021 03:14:16PM Via Free Access 88 Anthony
    Journal of African Military History 2 (2018) 87–118 brill.com/jamh “What Are They Observing?” The Accomplishments and Missed Opportunities of Observer Missions in the Nigerian Civil War Douglas Anthony* Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster PA [email protected] Abstract Three separate observer missions operated in Nigeria during the country’s 1967–1970 war against Biafran secession, charged with investigating allegations that Nigeria was engaged in genocide against Biafrans. Operating alongside UN and OAU missions, the four-country international observer group was best positioned to respond authorita- tively to those allegations, but problems with the composition of the group and its failure to extend the geographical scope of its operations beyond Nigerian-held terri- tory rendered its findings of limited value. This paper argues that the observer missions offer useful windows on several aspects of the war and almost certainly delivered some benefits to Biafrans, but also effectively abdicated their responsibility to Biafrans and the international community by allowing procedural politics to come before commit- ment to the spirit of the Genocide Convention. Keywords Biafra – genocide – Igbo – international observers – military observers – OAU – Nige- rian Civil War – United Nations * The author wishes to thank Jeffrey Kempler, whose initial foray into the United Nations archive seeded the research central to this article; the Franklin & Marshall College Hackman Fellows program; and Franklin & Marshall College for support for faculty research. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2018 | doi:10.1163/24680966-00202001Downloaded from Brill.com09/27/2021 03:14:16PM via free access 88 anthony 1 Introduction Three separate observer missions monitored Nigerian military operations dur- ing that country’s 1967–1970 war against the secessionist Republic of Biafra, a conflict remembered by some as the Nigerian Civil War and others as the Nigeria-Biafra War.
    [Show full text]
  • A/75/6 (Sect. 1) General Assembly
    United Nations A/75/6 (Sect. 1) General Assembly Distr.: General 27 April 2020 Original: English Seventy-fifth session Item 141 of the preliminary list* Proposed programme budget for 2021 Proposed programme budget for 2021 Part I Overall policymaking, direction and coordination Section 1 Overall policymaking, direction and coordination Contents Page I. Policymaking organs ............................................................ 5 1. General Assembly .......................................................... 8 B. Proposed post and non-post resource requirements for 2021*** ................ 8 2. Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (including its secretariat) ................................................................ 12 B. Proposed post and non-post resource requirements for 2021*** ................ 12 3. Committee on Contributions ................................................. 16 B. Proposed post and non-post resource requirements for 2021*** ................ 16 4. Board of Auditors (including its secretariat) ..................................... 17 B. Proposed post and non-post resource requirements for 2021*** ................ 17 5. United Nations Joint Staff Pension Board (including United Nations participation in the costs of the secretariat of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund) .............. 21 B. Proposed post and non-post resource requirements for 2021*** ................ 21 * A/75/50. ** In The part consisting of the proposed programme plan for 2021 is submitted for consideration
    [Show full text]
  • Women with a Blue Helmet
    Women with a Blue Helmet The Integration of Women and Gender Issues in UN Peacekeeping Missions Francesco Bertolazzi UN-INSTRAW Working Paper Series The United Nations International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (UN-INSTRAW) promotes applied research on gender, facilitates information sharing, and supports capacity building through networking mechanisms and multi- stakeholder partnerships with UN agencies, governments, academia and civil society. The Gender, Peace and Security Programme promotes inclusive peace and human security for men, women, boys and girls through research, knowledge management and capacity building. The Gender, Peace and Security Working Paper Series publishes the results of research conducted by the programme. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or UN-INSTRAW. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations or UN-INSTRAW concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Women with a Blue Helmet: The Integration of Women and Gender Issues in UN Peacekeeping Missions Author: Francesco Bertolazzi Supervisor: Nicola Popovic Editor and Reviewer: Hilary Anderson and Corey Barr United Nations International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (UN-INSTRAW) César Nicolás Penson 102-A Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic Phone: 1-809-685-2111 Fax: 1-809-685-2117 Email: [email protected] Webpage: http://www.un-instraw.org Copyright 2010 All rights reserved 1 Acknowledgements UN-INSTRAW and the author would like to thank the UN peacekeeping missions which participated in this survey, specifically MINURSO, MINUSTAH, MONUC, ONUCI, UNAMID, UNFICYP, UNMIK, UNMIL, UNMIS, UNMIT, UNOMIG, UNPOL and their relative Gender Advisors, Gender Focal Points and staff.
    [Show full text]
  • War Prevention Works 50 Stories of People Resolving Conflict by Dylan Mathews War Prevention OXFORD • RESEARCH • Groupworks 50 Stories of People Resolving Conflict
    OXFORD • RESEARCH • GROUP war prevention works 50 stories of people resolving conflict by Dylan Mathews war prevention works OXFORD • RESEARCH • GROUP 50 stories of people resolving conflict Oxford Research Group is a small independent team of Oxford Research Group was Written and researched by researchers and support staff concentrating on nuclear established in 1982. It is a public Dylan Mathews company limited by guarantee with weapons decision-making and the prevention of war. Produced by charitable status, governed by a We aim to assist in the building of a more secure world Scilla Elworthy Board of Directors and supported with Robin McAfee without nuclear weapons and to promote non-violent by a Council of Advisers. The and Simone Schaupp solutions to conflict. Group enjoys a strong reputation Design and illustrations by for objective and effective Paul V Vernon Our work involves: We bring policy-makers – senior research, and attracts the support • Researching how policy government officials, the military, of foundations, charities and The front and back cover features the painting ‘Lightness in Dark’ scientists, weapons designers and private individuals, many of decisions are made and who from a series of nine paintings by makes them. strategists – together with Quaker origin, in Britain, Gabrielle Rifkind • Promoting accountability independent experts Europe and the and transparency. to develop ways In this United States. It • Providing information on current past the new millennium, has no political OXFORD • RESEARCH • GROUP decisions so that public debate obstacles to human beings are faced with affiliations. can take place. nuclear challenges of planetary survival 51 Plantation Road, • Fostering dialogue between disarmament.
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference on Development in Honor of Professor Kwabena Gyimah-Brempong
    International Conference on Development in Honor of Professor Kwabena Gyimah-Brempong March 18 and 19, 2016 Day 1: Friday, March 18, 2016 Time Event 8:15-8.45 Registration Room: ISA Atrium 8:45-9:30 Opening Ceremony-Welcome Statements Room: ISA 1061 John Karikari US Government Accountability Office, Washington D.C Donna J Petersen Professor and Dean of the College of Public Health, Senior Associate Vice President, USF Health University of South Florida, Tampa Elizabeth Asiedu Professor, University of Kansas, Lawrence President, Association for the Advancement of African Woman Economists (AAAWE) Akua Agyen Research Associate, AAAWE 9:30-10:15 Keynote Address Room: ISA 1061 Kaye Husbands Fealing Professor and Chair, School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia Title: Governance and Growth: When Does Policy Matter? 10:15-10:30 Coffee Break Concurrent Sessions 10:30-12:30 Session 1: Room: ISA 3048 Session 2: Room: ISA 3051 Chair: Belinda Archibong Chair: Tewodaj Mogues Foreign Aid and FDI Gender Issues in Developing Countries Paper S1.1: The impact of the sectoral Paper S2.1: Reducing the gender gap in education: allocation of foreign aid on gender inequality Female teachers as Role Models Lynda Pickbourn, Hampshire College, Neepa Gaekwad Babulal, AAAWE and University of Amherst Kansas, Lawrence 10:30-12:30 Paper S1.2: A synthesis of market size, Paper S2.2: Female managers, attitudes toward women remittances and FDI flows to Sub-Sahara and the gender wage-gap: An empirical study of three Africa Sub-Saharan countries William
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War 1968-1970
    Copyright by Roy Samuel Doron 2011 The Dissertation Committee for Roy Samuel Doron Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Forging a Nation while losing a Country: Igbo Nationalism, Ethnicity and Propaganda in the Nigerian Civil War 1968-1970 Committee: Toyin Falola, Supervisor Okpeh Okpeh Catherine Boone Juliet Walker H.W. Brands Forging a Nation while losing a Country: Igbo Nationalism, Ethnicity and Propaganda in the Nigerian Civil War 1968-1970 by Roy Samuel Doron B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2011 Forging a Nation while losing a Country: Igbo Nationalism, Ethnicity and Propaganda in the Nigerian Civil War 1968-1970 Roy Samuel Doron, PhD The University of Texas at Austin, 2011 Supervisor: Toyin Falola This project looks at the ways the Biafran Government maintained their war machine in spite of the hopeless situation that emerged in the summer of 1968. Ojukwu’s government looked certain to topple at the beginning of the summer of 1968, yet Biafra held on and did not capitulate until nearly two years later, on 15 January 1970. The Ojukwu regime found itself in a serious predicament; how to maintain support for a war that was increasingly costly to the Igbo people, both in military terms and in the menacing face of the starvation of the civilian population. Further, the Biafran government had to not only mobilize a global public opinion campaign against the “genocidal” campaign waged against them, but also convince the world that the only option for Igbo survival was an independent Biafra.
    [Show full text]
  • SUDAN Intimidation and Denial Attacks on Freedom of Expression in Darfur
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2. Background ........................................................................................................... 2 3. News from Darfur.................................................................................................. 3 Pressure on Sudanese and the Sudanese press ........................................................ 4 Difficulty of access to and within Darfur................................................................ 6 4. Increasing visits to Darfur, increasing pressure to keep silent................................. 8 Detentions and intimidation for speaking out ......................................................... 8 Arrests for talking to monitors ............................................................................. 11 5. Arrests of people for speaking out and calling for a peaceful solution in Darfur ... 12 6. Khartoum in denial .............................................................................................. 13 Denying government participation ....................................................................... 14 Impunity.............................................................................................................. 15 Denying large-scale rape...................................................................................... 15 Denying the death toll.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    UNICEF/2021/EB/7/Rev.1 Distr.: General 4 May 2021 English only For information United Nations Children’s Fund Executive Board Annual session 2021 1–4 June 2021 Item 3 of the provisional agenda* Report on the implementation of the quadrennial comprehensive policy review of operational activities for development of the United Nations development system Summary This annex is submitted in accordance with resolution 2013/5 of the Economic and Social Council, in which the Council requested the United Nations funds and programmes to consolidate their current annual reporting on the implementation of the quadrennial comprehensive policy review of operational activities for development of the United Nations system (QCPR) within their reporting on the implementation of their strategic plans. To enhance harmonization and coherence across the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), and the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN- Women), the four agencies will continue to report using the common format outlined below. This table details the cumulative progress made in implementing General Assembly resolution 71/243 on the QCPR in the fourth and last year of its implementation. * E/ICEF/2021/9. UNICEF/2021/EB/7 2 / 38 I. General guidelines Quadrennial comprehensive policy review (QCPR) mandates (paras. 1–15) Progress Calls upon the entities of the United Nations A. Mainstreaming Sustainable Development Goals into /Rev.1 development system…to: strategic planning documents Mainstream the Sustainable Development 1. UNICEF Strategic Plan, 2018–2021 Goals in their strategic planning documents and their work at all levels (para.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from a Personal Journey Through the Genocide in Rwanda Written by Mukesh Kapila
    Lessons from a Personal Journey through the Genocide in Rwanda Written by Mukesh Kapila This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. Lessons from a Personal Journey through the Genocide in Rwanda https://www.e-ir.info/2014/05/15/lessons-from-a-personal-journey-through-the-genocide-in-rwanda/ MUKESH KAPILA, MAY 15 2014 This article is part of an E-IR series marking the twentieth commemoration of the Rwandan Genocide. This year marks the 20th anniversary of the Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda. The theme of the official commemorations – Kwibuka20 – asks the world to stand against genocide in three ways [1]: To remember by honouring the memory of those who died and offering support to those who survived To unite by reconciling through shared human values To renew by sharing our experiences and learning from others, to create a better world together As I sat in Kigali’s Amahoro Stadium on 7th April 2014 watching the official ceremony [2] unfold, the speeches of Rwandan President Kagame, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, and other world leaders were interrupted by the packed crowd: first a low wailing, and then lamentations as the families of genocide survivors vented their anguish. Red Cross volunteers stretchered away those who could bear no more. My previous visit to that stadium had been in 1994 when it was hosting a few thousand of the luckier escapees from the genocide.
    [Show full text]
  • Darfur, Sudan: the Responsibility to Protect
    House of Commons International Development Committee Darfur, Sudan: The responsibility to protect Fifth Report of Session 2004–05 Volume I HC 67-I House of Commons International Development Committee Darfur, Sudan: The responsibility to protect Fifth Report of Session 2004–05 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 16 March 2005 HC 67-I Published on 30 March 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The International Development Committee The International Development Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for International Development and its associated public bodies. Current membership Tony Baldry MP (Conservative, Banbury) (Chairman) John Barrett MP (Liberal Democrat, Edinburgh West) Mr John Battle MP (Labour, Leeds West) Hugh Bayley MP (Labour, City of York) Mr John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Ann Clwyd MP (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mr Tony Colman MP (Labour, Putney) Mr Quentin Davies MP (Conservative, Grantham and Stamford) Mr Piara S Khabra MP (Labour, Ealing Southall) Chris McCafferty MP (Labour, Calder Valley) Tony Worthington MP (Labour, Clydebank and Milngavie) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/indcom Committee staff The staff of the Committee are Alistair Doherty (Clerk), Hannah Weston (Second Clerk), Alan Hudson and Anna Dickson (Committee Specialists), Katie Phelan (Committee Assistant), Jennifer Steele (Secretary) and Philip Jones (Senior Office Clerk).
    [Show full text]
  • By Any Other Name: How, When, and Why the US Government Has Made
    By Any Other Name How, When, and Why the US Government Has Made Genocide Determinations By Todd F. Buchwald Adam Keith CONTENTS List of Acronyms ................................................................................. ix Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 Section 1 - Overview of US Practice and Process in Determining Whether Genocide Has Occurred ....................................................... 3 When Have Such Decisions Been Made? .................................. 3 The Nature of the Process ........................................................... 3 Cold War and Historical Cases .................................................... 5 Bosnia, Rwanda, and the 1990s ................................................... 7 Darfur and Thereafter .................................................................... 8 Section 2 - What Does the Word “Genocide” Actually Mean? ....... 10 Public Perceptions of the Word “Genocide” ........................... 10 A Legal Definition of the Word “Genocide” ............................. 10 Complications Presented by the Definition ...............................11 How Clear Must the Evidence Be in Order to Conclude that Genocide has Occurred? ................................................... 14 Section 3 - The Power and Importance of the Word “Genocide” .. 15 Genocide’s Unique Status .......................................................... 15 A Different Perspective ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr.: General 15 December 2005
    United Nations S/2005/791 Security Council Distr.: General 15 December 2005 Original: English Letter dated 14 December 2005 from the Permanent Representative of the Philippines to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council I have the honour to forward the assessment of the work of the Security Council by the presidency of the Philippines in September 2005 (see annex). It would be highly appreciated if the present letter and its annex could be circulated as a document of the Council. (Signed) Lauro L. Baja, Jr. Permanent Representative 05-66519 (E) 070206 *0566519* S/2005/791 Annex to the letter dated 14 December 2005 from the Permanent Representative of the Philippines to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council Assessment of the work of the Security Council during the presidency of the Philippines (September 2005) Introduction The Republic of the Philippines, with its Permanent Representative, H.E. Mr. Lauro L. Baja, Jr., at the helm, served as President of the Security Council in September 2005. The Security Council held 16 formal meetings and 12 consultations of the whole, adopted 9 resolutions, 2 decisions and 3 presidential statements, and issued 6 press statements during the month under review. The highlight of the month was the historic gathering of the Security Council at the level of Heads of State and Government on 14 September 2005. At the summit the Council adopted a resolution on terrorism and another resolution on conflict prevention, particularly in Africa. During the month, the Council also held a thematic debate on “The role of civil society in conflict prevention and the pacific settlement of disputes,” where representatives of the civil society participated in the discussion.
    [Show full text]