DOCSLIB.ORG

Village of La Farge Economic and Recreation Development Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Village of La Farge Economic and Recreation Development Plan VILLAGE VILLAGOF E LA FARGE ECONOMIC AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN Prepared by the Mississippi River Regional Planning Commission MRRPC under the direction of the La Farge Village Board and Plan Commission – June 2012. Funding was provided by the Kickapoo Valley Reforestation Fund administered by UW-Madison. ABSTRACT Title: Village of La Farge Economic and Recreation Development Plan Summary: In 2011 the Village of La Farge was awarded funding through the Kickapoo Valley Reforestation Fund administered through the University of Wisconsin-Madison. A portion of that grant was allocated for the preparation of an Economic and Recreation Development Plan responding to the continued economic struggles of the Kickapoo Valley caused by flooding of historic proportions in 2007 and 2008. The plan’s purpose is to enhance the ecological, economic and social well being of the Kickapoo Valley and its residents. Village President: Larry Gabrielson Village Trustees: Greg Lawton Delores Sandmire Randy Heisel Brandon Hysel Sara Hamilton Terry Jensen Plan Commission: Lyle Dorschied, Chairman Steve Lisney Sharon Walker Kent Steinmetz Tim Hill Brandon Hysel Mike Donovan Zach Biermann Village Clerk: Kim Walker Planning Staff: Mississippi River Regional Planning Commission Greg Flogstad, Director Peter Fletcher, Transportation Planner Barb Buros, Administrative Assistant UW-Madison: Janet Silbernagel, Department of Landscape Architecture, Principal Investigator Kristin Nixon, UW-Madison Student prepared all maps in the plan LA FARGE ECONOMIC AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 History and Setting ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Economic Realities ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Map 1 – Village of La Farge Public Properties .......................................................................................................... 2 Building Blocks in Place ............................................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 2. PUBLIC PLANNING PROCESS ................................................................................................................ 4 SECTION 3. PUBLIC INPUT .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Village of La Farge Economic and Recreation Development Community Survey .................................................... 5 Public Informational Meeting ..................................................................................................................................... 10 SECTION 4. DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC INFORMATION ................................................................................. 12 Population ................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Table 1: Population Trends (1960-2010) - La Farge, Surrounding Municipalities, County, State and Nation ...................... 12 Population Projections .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Table 2: Population Projections - La Farge, Surrounding Municipalities, County, State and Nation ...................................... 12 Age ........................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Table 3: Population by Age - La Farge, Surrounding Municipalities, County, State and Nation ............................................. 13 Gender ...................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Table 4: Population by Gender - La Farge, Surrounding Municipalities, County, State and Nation ....................................... 13 Labor Force and Employment ................................................................................................................................... 13 Table 5: Employment - La Farge, County, State and Nation .................................................................................................. 14 Labor Force Unemployment Rates ........................................................................................................................... 14 Table 6: Unemployment Rate Trends - County, State and Nation .......................................................................................... 14 Labor Force Occupations .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Table 7: La Farge, County, State and Nation Occupation Groups ......................................................................................... 14 Labor Force Class of Worker .................................................................................................................................... 15 Table 8: La Farge, County, State and Nation Class of Worker ............................................................................................... 15 Economic Base Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 15 Table 9: La Farge, County, State and Nation Employment by Industry .................................................................................. 15 Major Employers ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 Table 10: La Farge Major Employers ...................................................................................................................................... 16 Employment by Industry and Occupation Projections ............................................................................................... 16 Table 11: Western Wis. Workforce Development Area Industry Employment Projections 2008-2018 ................................... 16 Table 12: Western Wis. Workforce Development Area Occupational Projections 2008-2018................................................ 17 Housing Data ............................................................................................................................................................ 18 Table 13: Housing Unit Occupancy Characteristics 2010 ....................................................................................................... 18 Table 14: Vacant Housing Units Occupancy Characteristics .................................................................................................. 19 Table 15: Vacancy Rates ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 Table 16: Average Household Size ........................................................................................................................................ 19 Table 17: Housing Units by Type ............................................................................................................................................ 20 Table 18: Year Structure Built ................................................................................................................................................. 20 Table 19: Year Householder Moved In ................................................................................................................................... 21 Table 20: Value Owner Occupied Units .................................................................................................................................. 21 Table 21: Selected Monthly Owner Costs as Percentage of Household Income ................................................................... 22 Table 22: Gross Rent as Percentage of Household Income (GRAPI) .................................................................................... 22 Organic Valley........................................................................................................................................................... 22 Economic Impact ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Additional Village of La Farge Information ................................................................................................................ 23 Map 2 – Village of La Farge Transportation .............................................................................................................. 24 Map 3 – Village of La Farge Floodplain .................................................................................................................... 25 Map 4 – Village of La Farge Existing Zoning ............................................................................................................ 26 SECTION 5. RECREATION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LF0071 Ch6.Pdf
    Figure 6.2: Watersheds (HUC 10) and Sub‐Watersheds (HUC 12) of the Kickapoo River Region. 6‐2 1. OVERVIEW a) Physical Environment This region encompasses both the Kickapoo and La Crosse rivers with a long, large upland ridge running from Norwalk in La Crosse County, south‐southwest to Eastman in Crawford County. On either side of this ridge are numerous narrow hills and valleys that are home to countless headwater creeks. Fed by springs and seeps, these cold waters form some of the most popular trout angling streams in the Driftless Area. Much of the region is covered with deep loess deposits over bedrock (primarily dolostone, sandstone or shale). Soils are primarily silt loams. The region is home to many dry and wet cliffs. The valleys contain stream terraces and floodplains. Streams are high gradient with fast water flow in the headwaters transitioning to meandering low gradient segments as they move toward the Kickapoo and Mississippi Rivers. Groundwater is recharged directly through precipitation. This area has no natural lakes. Figure 6.3: Land cover of the Kickapoo River Region. b) Land Cover and Use The region’s most common land cover is upland forest which blankets most of the hillsides. Crop land is restricted to the uplands and valley floors. The broad, high ridge around Westby and Viroqua is the largest block of upland farmland in the region. The La Crosse River valley floor is also heavily farmed. Very little of the region is prime farmland. c) Terrestrial Habitats This region is especially noteworthy for its current opportunities for the management of big block forests and dry prairie/oak openings near the Mississippi and Kickapoo rivers as well as oak barrens and southern mesic forest in portions of Monroe County.
    [Show full text]
  • The Driftless Area – a Physiographic Setting (Dale K
    A Look Back at Driftless Area Science to Plan for Resiliency in an Uncertain Future th Special Publication of the 11 Annual Driftless Area Symposium 1 A Look Back at Driftless Area Science to Plan for Resiliency in an Uncertain Future Special Publication of the 11th Annual Driftless Area Symposium Radisson Hotel, La Crosse, Wisconsin February 5th-6th, 2019 Table of Contents: Preface: A Look Back at Driftless Area Science to Plan for Resiliency in an Uncertain Future (Daniel C. Dauwalter, Jeff Hastings, Marty Melchior, and J. “Duke” Welter) ........................................... 1 The Driftless Area – A Physiographic Setting (Dale K. Splinter) .......................................................... 5 Driftless Area Land Cover and Land Use (Bruce Vondracek)................................................................ 8 Hydrology of the Driftless Area (Kenneth W. Potter) ........................................................................... 15 Geology and Geomorphology of the Driftless Area (Marty Melchior) .............................................. 20 Stream Habitat Needs for Brown Trout and Brook Trout in the Driftless Area (Douglas J. Dieterman and Matthew G. Mitro) ............................................................................................................ 29 Non-Game Species and Their Habitat Needs in the Driftless Area (Jeff Hastings and Bob Hay) .... 45 Climate Change, Recent Floods, and an Uncertain Future (Daniel C. Dauwalter and Matthew G. Mitro) .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 to 2010
    KICKAPOO RIVER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT 2000 TO 2010 VALLEY STEWARDSHIP NETWORK SARAH GRAINGER, M.A.SC. DECEMBER 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Kickapoo River Watershed Assessment has been created by the Valley Stewardship Network (VSN) to provide a critical look at the health of the watershed based on surface water data. Surface water quality data, while one of many components used to assess the health of a watershed, is among the most informative. Thanks to the extraordinary commitment of citizen monitors VSN has provided a quantity of surface water quality data in the Kickapoo River Watershed that compares to that of the regulatory agencies. This assessment will review both Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and VSN data since 2000. Data was analyzed for each watershed, waterbody and station. The Kickapoo watershed was divided into five smaller watersheds as defined by the WDNR; Upper, Middle and Lower Kickapoo Watersheds, West Fork of the Kickapoo Watershed and Reads and Tainter Watershed. For the purpose of this assessment, data was separated into six assessment categories; temperature, core, nutrients, macroinvertebrate, bacteriological and chemical. Data was assessed using WDNR and US Environmental Protection Agency water quality limits and recommendations. In most cases the data available was not extensive enough for a conclusive determination. As such the data was used to provide an indication of the watershed health. The water quality data shows varying watershed health conditions. Some data shows no degradation, while other data showed evidence of human impact. Only a few streams had values that could be considered impaired by WDNR classification system. Most streams showed temperature ranges that could be classify it as a cold stream.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Kickapoo River Watershed (Lw05)
    MIDDLE KICKAPOO RIVER WATERSHED (LW05) he Middle Kickapoo River Watershed is located in central Vernon County, but also includes portions of Watershed At A Glance south central Monroe County and northwest Richland T 2 Drainage Area (m ): 247 County as well. This watershed includes all streams that flow to the Kickapoo River between Ontario and Readstown. The Total Stream Miles: 205.5 topography of the Middle Kickapoo River Watershed is quite severe with steep wooded hillsides and narrow valleys which Trout Stream Miles: 128.6 limits the majority of farmland in this watershed to the ridgetops. Only a small portion of the Middle Kickapoo River Sport Fishery Miles: 0 Watershed contains wetlands and they are concentrated along the Kickapoo River, Weister Creek and Warner Creek. An Lakes: None abundance of trout streams drain this watershed. Recently the section of the Kickapoo River in this watershed was classified Exceptional/Outstanding as Class II trout. Resource Waters: Cheyenne Valley Creek, Elk Creek, Camp Creek, Bufton Hollow Creek, Population of the Middle Kickapoo River Watershed for the South Bear Creek year 2000 was estimated at approximately 4,120 which includes portions of 15 townships and three villages. The fastest growing Municipalities: La Farge, community in this watershed is Ontario at nearly 17%. Ontario, Viola Table 1: Growth in Municipalities in the Watershed Major Public Lands: Municipality 1990 2000 % Change ♦ Kickapoo Valley Reserve La Farge 766 775 1.17% ♦ Wildcat Mountain State Park Ontario (part) 407 476 16.9% Concerns and Issues: Viola 644 667 3.57% ♦ Nonpoint source pollution ♦ Proliferation of spring ponds La Farge, Ontario, and Viola each have Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (WPDES) permits to discharge Initiatives and Projects: treated wastewater to the Kickapoo River.
    [Show full text]
  • La Farge Lake, Kickapoo River, Wisconsin Environmental Statement
    13 November 1970 ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT LA FARGE LAKE KICKAPOO RIVER, WISCONSIN prepared by U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 13 November 1970 LA FARGE LAKE, KICKAPOO RIVER, WISCONSIN ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 (P.L. 8 7-8 7^). The plan consists of a multiple-purpose lake for flood control, enhancement of fish and wildlife resources and recreation; possible future channel enlargement at downstream restrictive points; and local flood pro­ tection works at the downstream communities of Soldiers Grove and Gays Mills, Wisconsin. The damsite and lake are located on the Kickapoo River about 1 mile north of La Farge in Vernon County, southwestern, Wisconsin. The dam will be an earth-fill structure with an overall length of 3,96*0 feet ... and a maximum height of 103 feet. The conservation or 'recreation pool at elevation 8*10 impounds about 3 3 ,0 0 0 acre-feet of water with a surface area of about 1,780 acres. The project as originally authorized provided for an earth-fill structure with the conservation or recreation pool limited to an elevation of 822 and a surface area of about 800 acres. Recognizing the need for greater water area for recreational purposes in the southwestern part of the State and a possible future pumped storage hydroelectric power develop­ ment, the conservation pool was raised to elevation 8^0. This higher ele­ vation also obviated the need for several proposed impoundments for fish propagation on Weister Creek as recommended earlier by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • March 25, 2015 TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE MEETING Douglas County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, April 1
    March 25, 2015 TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE MEETING Douglas County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, April 1, 2015, 9:30 a.m., Highway Department Office 7417 S. County Road E, Hawthorne, Wisconsin Please call the Chair, the Highway Department Office (715-374-2575) or the County Clerk’s Office (715-395-1397) if you cannot attend. MEMBERS: Kay Johnson, Chair Marvin Finendale, Vice Chair Nick Baker Pat Ryan Charlie Glazman A G E N D A (Committee to maintain a two-hour meeting limit or take action to continue meeting beyond that time.) 1. Roll call. 2. Approval of minutes from the March 4, 2015, meeting (attached). 3. Action items/referrals: (a) Evaluate and rank design consultants for the CTH C/Soo Line Bridge replacement (attached); (b) Rescind approved snowmobile route on CTH Y from the March 4, 2015 meeting; (c) Review changes to ATV permit applications and policy (attached); and (d) Implements of Husbandry Ordinance (attached). 4. Informational: (a) ATV ordinance authority; (b) CTH D Evans to Elm; (c) Highway portal exterior lighting update; (d) 0.5% County Sales Tax option for transportation purposes; (e) Reports: (1) Administrative; (2) Projects; and (3) Budget (attached). 5. Future agenda items. cc: Shelley Nelson Carolyn Pierce Sue Sandvick Andy Lisak Ann Doucette County Board Supervisors NOTE: Attachments to the agenda are available at the County Clerk’s Office for review or copying and at the Douglas County website at www.douglascountywi.org. Action may be taken on any item listed on the agenda. The County of Douglas complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Agenda with Track
    10th Annual Driftless Area Symposium Agenda Monday – Tuesday February 5th & 6th, 2018 Radisson Hotel, 200 Harborview Plaza Monday, February 5th, 2018 Registration - Hotel Foyer – Radisson 9:00 a.m. to noon 9:30 – Welcome and Announcements, Hotel Ballroom – Jeff Hastings, Project Manager – Trout Unlimited 10:00 Driftless Area Restoration Effort 10:00 Lightning Round – 12 Driftless Organizations will have 5 minutes to tell you a little about their -11:00 organization and what they are up to. 11:00 Mary Marczak, Director, University of Minnesota Extension - will be talking about the – importance of Diversity in Watershed Management to the Watershed Mgmt track. 11:45 Dave Vetrano, Retired DNR Fisheries Biologist, WI DNR – History of stream restoration in the Driftless Area, speaking to the Riparian Management track 12:00 LUNCH – BALLROOM -1:00 Luncheon speaker – Curt Meine –The Driftless Reader ECONOMICS, SOCIAL AND Track HUMAN DRIVERS IN Track TROUT – RESEARCH, MANAGEMENT, 1 AGRICULTURE & WATERSHED 2 PROGRAMS MANAGEMENT Time SESSION Time SESSION Driftless White Paper, Climate Change, Southeast Minnesota's Field to Grazing & Partnerships 1:00 Stream Program for Agricultural to Producers Moderator: 3:00 Moderator: 1:00 to Dan Dauwalter – Update on progress of – Agriculture field Kevin Kuehner 2:50 White Paper and Climate change. runoff measurements in micro watersheds of the Root River and conservation practices Marty Melchior – to be determined recommendations. Ron Meiners – Ag Producer contacts 1:00 to Caroline Gottschalk Druschke – Social use and field walks to access conservation 2:50 of wood in projects. practices. Rod Ofte – Managing state properties by Amber Radatz – UW Extension Field Grazing.
    [Show full text]
  • Vernon County Comprehensive Plan 2030—Phase I Document
    Comprehensive Plan of the County of Vernon Wisconsin Phase I Inventory and Trends Report for Vision 2030 Recommended Draft September 2009 Prepared by the Vernon County Comprehensive Plan Commission Lynn Chakoian - Commission Chair, Economic Development Work Group Jim Servais - Commission Vice-Chair, Land Use and Ag, Natural and Historic Resource Work Groups Karen Ehle-Traastad and Armand Bringe - Housing Work Group Cliff Peterson – Transportation Work Group Dennis Brault – Utilities Work Group Brad Steinmetz – Intergovernmental Cooperation Work Group Phil Hooker – Land Use Maynard Cox and Tom Spenner –Implementation Staff Support Doug Avoles - Planner/GIS Coordinator Lori Polhamus – Clerks Office, Deputy II Greg Lunde – County Corporation Counsel 2 | Vernon County Comprehensive Plan Phase I Table of Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................................... iii Figures ............................................................................................................................................. iv Maps ................................................................................................................................................ iv Appendices ....................................................................................................................................... v 1. Issues and Opportunities ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • That's the Essence of a B&B Getaway
    Relax . be yourself, savor culinary specialties . enjoy a good night’s sleep! That’s the essence of a B&B getaway. INN-Credible Gift Certificates Famous Wisconsin hospitality – equal parts graciousness Good at every one of the 200 WBBA inns and genuine fun – are served up in ample doses at 200 Personalized and with no expiration date , WBBA WBBA properties. In every corner of the state, member inns (and innkeepers for that matter) each have unique INN-Credible Gift Certificates live up to their name! personalities, giving B&B travel its special appeal. Congeniality has always been a WBBA hallmark, so WBBA inns have passed a rigorous Standards Inspection we especially enjoy presenting travelers with our in order to earn association membership. And WBBA easy-to-give and easy-to-use gift certificate. innkeepers will share insider knowledge of their area, Ordering is easy too. Log on to www.yestobliss.com . pointing you to the best art galleries, hiking trails, fishing Click on the Gift Certificate link at the bottom of the spots and shopping finds. WBBA home page or call CertifiChecks at 877-770-4438. Inside these pages are photos and a short description of Your thoughtful gift may be used to return to a favorite each inn. Find greater detail at www.yestobliss.com . B&B, visit a new inn, or experience B&B bliss for the first We’ve been selective … now it’s your turn! time. Consider an INN-Credible Gift Certificate the Let us know how you enjoyed your stay. We welcome next time you’re buying a gift for any of these occasions: comments at www.yestobliss.com .
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 WI DNR Catchable Trout-Fish Stocked As of 04.26.2021
    2021 WI DNR Catchable Trout-Fish Stocked As Of 04.26.2021 County Waterbody Species Age Class # Stocked BARRON BEAVER DAM LAKE BROWN TROUT ADULT (BROODSTOCK) 237 BARRON BRILL RIVER BROWN TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 6000 BARRON LITTLE GRANITE LAKE RAINBOW TROUT ADULT (BROODSTOCK) 124 BARRON LITTLE GRANITE LAKE RAINBOW TROUT YEARLING 1898 BARRON TURTLE CREEK BROWN TROUT YEARLING 1816 BARRON YELLOW RIVER BROWN TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 8000 BAYFIELD BEAVER LAKE BROOK TROUT YEARLING 1500 BAYFIELD MIMI LAKE BROOK TROUT YEARLING 750 BAYFIELD OVERBY LAKE BROOK TROUT YEARLING 600 BAYFIELD PERCH LAKE BROOK TROUT YEARLING 4086 BROWN TROUT CREEK BROOK TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 2026 BUFFALO BOTANA VALLEY BROOK TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 100 BUFFALO BOTANA VALLEY BROWN TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 75 BUFFALO EAGLE CREEK BROWN TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 750 BUFFALO ELK CREEK BROWN TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 599 BUFFALO GILMANTON POND RAINBOW TROUT YEARLING 650 BUFFALO LITTLE BEAR CREEK BROOK TROUT YEARLING 306 BUFFALO LITTLE WAUMANDEE CREEK BROOK TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 500 BUFFALO MILL CREEK BROOK TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 700 BUFFALO NEWTON VALLEY BROOK TROUT YEARLING 275 BUFFALO NORTH BRANCH LITTLE BEAR CREEK BROOK TROUT YEARLING 1060 Tuesday, April 27, 2021 Page 1 of 20 County Waterbody Species Age Class # Stocked BUFFALO ROSSMAN CREEK BROOK TROUT YEARLING 264 BUFFALO SOUTH FORK ELK CREEK BROWN TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 600 BUFFALO SWINNS VALLEY BROOK TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 400 BUFFALO SWINNS VALLEY BROWN TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 400 BUFFALO TROUT CREEK BROOK TROUT LARGE FINGERLING 500
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Wisconsin Trout Fall Issue
    Wisconsin Council of Trout Unlimited NONPROFIT ORG. 1423 Storytown Road U.S. POSTAGE News and Views from Wisconsin Trout Unlimited Oregon, WI 53575 PAID wicouncil.tu.org PERMIT NO. 1 MADISON, WI Wisconsin Trout Fall 2018 Disastrous floods becoming the new normal Photos by Duke Welter by Duke Photos JERSEY VALLEY DAM BREACHED DESTRUCTIVE FLOOD WATERS REACHED AMAZING HEIGHTS Six flood control dams failed in Vernon and Monroe counties, leading to Ontario was one of many towns inundated by torrential rains and truly evacuations of downstream communities and rapid water level increases. The destructive flood waters. Flooding devastated low-lying areas in the Coon Jersey Valley Dam in Vernon County, shown here, was among them. Creek, Kickapoo River and Baraboo River watersheds. By Duke Welter increases in a matter of minutes. ers checked out damage to Black and breaches of the Jersey Valley Emergency workers in Vernon Earth Creek near Black Earth and and Mlsna dams in the West Fork Record-breaking rainfalls in late County, such as volunteer firefight- Mazomanie. We haven’t yet visited led to heavy flushes of water and August and early September tested ers and EMTs, police and DNR Black Earth or the Sugar River, more damage in those subwater- communities, infrastructure and wardens, evacuated more than 350 both of which carried significant sheds. In addition, techniques used trout streams in the heart of the people with boats and wheel load- amounts of rainfall, but hope others in the past weren’t engineered to Driftless Area. Rebuilding will go ers. A dozen valley-floor towns will visit and report.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurley, Lee and Storck: KICKAPOO VALLEY 39 PREHISTORIC CULTURAL SITES in RELATION to SOILS and OTHER PHYSICAL FEATURES of the LA
    Hurley, Lee and Storck: KICKAPOO VALLEY 39 PREHISTORIC CULTURAL SITES IN RELATION TO SOILS AND OTHER PHYSICAL FEATURES OF THE LANDSCAPE IN PART OF THE KICKAPOO VALLEY, WISCONSIN WILLIAM M. HURLEY, GERHARD B. LEE AND PETER L. STORCK 1 Several years ago, as part of a flood control program, the United States Army Corps of Engineers proposed that a dam be built on the West Fork of the Kickapoo River in Vernon County, Wisconsin. This plan has since been approved. The resultant pool, or reservoir, when filled, will innundate many archeological sites along the river and its tributaries between the villages of La Farge and Ontario. Because of the impending destruction of these sites, the pool area was included in the U.S. Department of Interior's River Basin Survey's program of survey and salvage of archaeological remains from areas threatened with destruction by impounded waters. As a result, field investi- gations have been made, resulting in the location and classification of a large number of sites within or adjacent to the proposed pool. In 1969, a detailed soil map, and soil survey report of Vernon County was published by the USDA (Slota, 1969). This soil map and report made it possible to determine the nature of the soils on which various kinds of archeological sites occurred, and by inference, the native vegetation. The location of sites in regard to landforms and streams was made possible by study of soil maps, topographic maps, and air photos. The primary purpose of the present study was to determine the location of archaeological sites in relation to physical features of the landscape, including kinds of soil.
    [Show full text]