DOCSLIB.ORG

La Farge Lake, Kickapoo River, Wisconsin Environmental Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
La Farge Lake, Kickapoo River, Wisconsin Environmental Statement 13 November 1970 ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT LA FARGE LAKE KICKAPOO RIVER, WISCONSIN prepared by U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 13 November 1970 LA FARGE LAKE, KICKAPOO RIVER, WISCONSIN ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 (P.L. 8 7-8 7^). The plan consists of a multiple-purpose lake for flood control, enhancement of fish and wildlife resources and recreation; possible future channel enlargement at downstream restrictive points; and local flood pro­ tection works at the downstream communities of Soldiers Grove and Gays Mills, Wisconsin. The damsite and lake are located on the Kickapoo River about 1 mile north of La Farge in Vernon County, southwestern, Wisconsin. The dam will be an earth-fill structure with an overall length of 3,96*0 feet ... and a maximum height of 103 feet. The conservation or 'recreation pool at elevation 8*10 impounds about 3 3 ,0 0 0 acre-feet of water with a surface area of about 1,780 acres. The project as originally authorized provided for an earth-fill structure with the conservation or recreation pool limited to an elevation of 822 and a surface area of about 800 acres. Recognizing the need for greater water area for recreational purposes in the southwestern part of the State and a possible future pumped storage hydroelectric power develop­ ment, the conservation pool was raised to elevation 8^0. This higher ele­ vation also obviated the need for several proposed impoundments for fish propagation on Weister Creek as recommended earlier by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING WITHOUT THE PROJECT " ‘ r 1 - T 1 GENERAL AREA The Kickapoo -River originates in Monroe County 7 miles south of Tomah and flows southwesterly for 106 miles through parts of Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties. It enters the Wisconsin River below Wauzeka, ap­ proximately 17 miles above the confluence of the Wisconsin River with the Mississippi River. In the headwaters, the stream falls about U00 feet in the first 11 miles. The lower and flatter reach has a gradient of about 250 feet in 95 miles. The river meanders in a narrow floodplain and varies in width from 60 feet in the upper portion to 100 feet in the lower reaches. The Kickapoo River drainage basin, consisting of 766 square miles of coulee-type terrain, is approximately 60 miles long and 8.5 to 18 miles wide. Except for the rolling country along the western and northern rim of the area, the watershed generally is extremely hilly. The maximum variance in elevation from the highlands of the northern sector to the lowlands of the southern portion is about 770 feet. West Fork, with a drainage area.of 118 square miles, is the largest tributary. Pine, Taintor, Weister, Brush, Morris, Billings, Warner, and Big Bear Creeks are the other principal subdrainages, varying in size from 21 to 53 square miles. In addition to these branches, there are 25 smaller subwatersheds ranging in size down to four square miles. The average flow of the Kickapoo River at La Farge is l6l cfs (cubic feet per second). The minimum recorded flow, which occurred on 2 h Mar 51» was 1.8 cfs. The maximum discharge of 6,750 cfs, on U Apr 5 6 , is recorded . as a devastating flood. Overbank flooding normally occurs in March, April May, and June although it may occur in any month. The entire length of the main-stem floodplain is subject to inundation during periods of heavy precipitation. The floodplain of the main stem, which varies in width from one-fourth to three-fourths of a mile, is largely confined by ridges that rise 300 to 500 feet above the valley floor. Rock outcroppings and rocky promontories are common. Numerous springs flow from the lowest exposed sandstone strata. The floodplain is cultivated or pastured except for areas too narrow or craggy to make farming feasible. Most of these areas, and the steeper slopes, are covered with hardwood timber and white pine. Remnant stands of hemlock occur on the north and northeast slopes and around spring holes and seeps. The Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,has been active in the basin since 1935 providing technical services to individual farmers and soil and water conservation districts. Thus, many land treat­ ment measures such as waterways and strip cropping have been installed. Additionally, three watersheds within the basin, encompassing an area of about 265 square miles, have been planned, under P.L. 5 6 6 , to include conservation measures for watershed protection and structural measures for flood prevention and recreational developments. Of the three watershed projects, one is nearing completion and the remaining two were approved for operations in April 1 9 6 9 . Two State highways intersect at La Farge. In addition, there are two Federal and six State highways, and several county roads within a 15-mile radius of the lake area. The ten Wisconsin counties lying within a 50-mile radius of the project have a total population of 358,700. La Crosse (population about 5 1 »^5 0 ) is the only town within this ten-county area having over 10,000 inhabitants. The economy of Vernon County, in which La Farge Lake would be located, is dependent upon agricultural products. It is the principal tobacco- producing county in Wisconsin and is one of the principal dairying counties. There are two hydroelectric power plants on the Kickapoo River. These are located at Ontario and La Farge. Fishing end hunting opportunities are not abundant in the project area and pressure on these resources is relatively light. However, there are about 30 State-owned or leased public hunting and fishing areas, one State forest and one wildlife refuge within a 50-mile radius of the lake site. Wildcat Mountain State, Park (2,175 acres), is located east of the river and three miles from Ontario, adjacent to the upper limits of the flood control pool. There are also numerous roadside parks, rest areas, and scenic look-out sites in the general vicinity of the project. LAKE SITE The lake area is typical of the rugged terrain and picturesque bluffs found throughout much of the Kickapoo River basin. Characteristically rounded to nearly flat-topped ridges lie one-quarter mile back from the main stem and rise 300 feet or more above the valley floor. Small stands of white pine cover the upper face of some of the rock bluffs along the river. As the river winds through the proposed reservoir area, it is joined by several tributaries, the largest of which are Weister Creek, which enters from the west, and Billings and Jug Creeks which join the Kickapoo River from the east. These tributaries and many of the smaller feeder streams are spring fed and have permanent flows. The entire stream system in the lake area is in deplorable physical condition. Flash floods, their severity increased by land abuse, occur in all seasons of the year and have left denuded and eroded banks, new channels, cuts and heavy deposits of silt and sand. Even though the spring-fed feeder streams are usually clear, the main stem is permanently clouded with suspended silt. The pools and riffles of past years are gone and in their place are shallow holes and shifting beds of sand and,silt which blanket the channel bottom. Approximately ^0 percent of the project area is wooded; 25 percent is open grass or pastureland; 25 percent is cropland, including tame hay; 2 percent is wetland, marsh, and ponds; and the remainder includes mis­ cellaneous uses such as farmsteads, villages, and public roads. The upland soils in the lake area axe derived primarily from the sedimentary bedrock although on the higher and more level ridge tops there is a layer of fertile wind-borne soil. The alluvial deposits of the flood- plain are composed largely of soils washed from upper levels. Most of the level land has been farmed for the last one hundred years. Cropland is confined primarily to the second-terrace bottom soils and loess soils of the ridge tops and to a lesser extent to the accessible hillsides. Strip cropping is common. Most of the corn, oats, and tame hay crops are fed to the dairy herds and tobacco is the chief cash crop. Because of the generally rough topography and periodic flooding, few prosperous farms are found in this viciruty. The "bottomland soils adjacent to stream courses are normally too vet to cultivate. They are marked by wet pastures, small lagoons and marshes, formed in old river channels. Bottomland hardwood timber is found in limited quantities along the sandstone outcroppings and, in the deeper sub-valleys, white pine and hemlock trees are common. 3. THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED ACTION a. The proposed plan would dedicate about 1,780 acres of water sur­ face area and about 8,000 acres of land to public ownership for the benefit of present and future generations. Currently, 13 recreation areas are planned involving about 1,1+00 acres including access points. However, the actual number of sites and acreage will be dependent on the proposals made by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, which has indicated its intent to maintain and operate the recreation sites in conjunction with the adjacent Wildcat Mountain State Park. The State has also indicated its intent to manage the remaining land not required for project operation for wildlife purposes. The fishing habitat of the river would benefit from a more uniform flow during the recreation season, from land stabilization which would re­ duce stream turbidity, and from the real estate acquisition policy that would make more bank fishing area available to the public.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LF0071 Ch6.Pdf
    Figure 6.2: Watersheds (HUC 10) and Sub‐Watersheds (HUC 12) of the Kickapoo River Region. 6‐2 1. OVERVIEW a) Physical Environment This region encompasses both the Kickapoo and La Crosse rivers with a long, large upland ridge running from Norwalk in La Crosse County, south‐southwest to Eastman in Crawford County. On either side of this ridge are numerous narrow hills and valleys that are home to countless headwater creeks. Fed by springs and seeps, these cold waters form some of the most popular trout angling streams in the Driftless Area. Much of the region is covered with deep loess deposits over bedrock (primarily dolostone, sandstone or shale). Soils are primarily silt loams. The region is home to many dry and wet cliffs. The valleys contain stream terraces and floodplains. Streams are high gradient with fast water flow in the headwaters transitioning to meandering low gradient segments as they move toward the Kickapoo and Mississippi Rivers. Groundwater is recharged directly through precipitation. This area has no natural lakes. Figure 6.3: Land cover of the Kickapoo River Region. b) Land Cover and Use The region’s most common land cover is upland forest which blankets most of the hillsides. Crop land is restricted to the uplands and valley floors. The broad, high ridge around Westby and Viroqua is the largest block of upland farmland in the region. The La Crosse River valley floor is also heavily farmed. Very little of the region is prime farmland. c) Terrestrial Habitats This region is especially noteworthy for its current opportunities for the management of big block forests and dry prairie/oak openings near the Mississippi and Kickapoo rivers as well as oak barrens and southern mesic forest in portions of Monroe County.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Habitat Needs for Brook Trout and Brown Trout in the Driftless Area
    Stream Habitat Needs for Brook Trout and Brown Trout in the Driftless Area Douglas J. Dietermana,1 and Matthew G. Mitrob aMinnesota Department of Natural Resources, Lake City, Minnesota, USA; bWisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin, USA This manuscript was compiled on February 5, 2019 1. Several conceptual frameworks have been proposed to organize in Driftless Area streams. Our specific objectives were and describe fish habitat needs. to: (1) summarize information on the basic biology 2. The five-component framework recognizes that stream trout pop- of Brook Trout and Brown Trout in Driftless Area ulations are regulated by hydrology, water quality, physical habi- streams, (2) briefly review conceptual frameworks or- tat/geomorphology, connectivity, and biotic interactions and man- ganizing fish habitat needs, (3) trace the historical agement of only one component will be ineffective if a different com- evolution of studies designed to identify Brook Trout ponent limits the population. and Brown Trout habitat needs in the context of 3. The thermal niche of both Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis and these conceptual frameworks, (4) review Brook Trout- Brown Trout Salmo trutta has been well described. Brown Trout interactions and (5) discuss lingering un- 4. Selected physical habitat characteristics such as pool depths and certainties in habitat management for these species. adult cover, have a long history of being manipulated in the Driftless Area leading to increased abundance of adult trout. Brook Trout and Brown Trout Biology 5. Most blue-ribbon trout streams in the Driftless Area probably pro- vide sufficient habitat for year-round needs (e.g., spawning, feeding, Brook Trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Vernon County Multi Hazard Mitigation Plan 2018-2022
    VERNON COUNTY WISCONSIN MULTI- HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN 2018-2022 FOR R A W D J C AC O K L S A O F N F U L B A C N R This plan was prepared by the Mississippi River Regional O MRRPC O N S S R E E Planning Commission through a cooperative cost sharing V T E R O E agreement with the Vernon County Board of Supervisors, the R M N P O E Mississippi River Regional Planning Commission, Wisconsin A M L E N A PI U PE Emergency Management, and the Federal Emergency PI E R C E Management Agency. Vernon County Multi-Hazards Mitigation Plan 2018-2022 ABSTRACT Title: VERNON COUNTY MULTI-HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN Plan Purpose: This plan’s purpose it to identify goals, projects and actions the county, other local governments and other organizations can undertake to reduce hazard risks to life, health and property. This plan through properly addressing the federal requirements in the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 makes the county and other local governments that participated in the planning process eligible for Federal Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs. These programs can assist in planning, relocation and infrastructure projects that reduce and sometimes eliminate losses and damage from hazards. Plan Participants: This plan was prepared under the direction of the County Emergency Management Committee who coordinated their plan development efforts through the County Emergency Management Director. The Mississippi River Regional Planning Commission who wrote a planning grant to fund this plan was contracted with to write the plan and facilitate public meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Driftless Area – a Physiographic Setting (Dale K
    A Look Back at Driftless Area Science to Plan for Resiliency in an Uncertain Future th Special Publication of the 11 Annual Driftless Area Symposium 1 A Look Back at Driftless Area Science to Plan for Resiliency in an Uncertain Future Special Publication of the 11th Annual Driftless Area Symposium Radisson Hotel, La Crosse, Wisconsin February 5th-6th, 2019 Table of Contents: Preface: A Look Back at Driftless Area Science to Plan for Resiliency in an Uncertain Future (Daniel C. Dauwalter, Jeff Hastings, Marty Melchior, and J. “Duke” Welter) ........................................... 1 The Driftless Area – A Physiographic Setting (Dale K. Splinter) .......................................................... 5 Driftless Area Land Cover and Land Use (Bruce Vondracek)................................................................ 8 Hydrology of the Driftless Area (Kenneth W. Potter) ........................................................................... 15 Geology and Geomorphology of the Driftless Area (Marty Melchior) .............................................. 20 Stream Habitat Needs for Brown Trout and Brook Trout in the Driftless Area (Douglas J. Dieterman and Matthew G. Mitro) ............................................................................................................ 29 Non-Game Species and Their Habitat Needs in the Driftless Area (Jeff Hastings and Bob Hay) .... 45 Climate Change, Recent Floods, and an Uncertain Future (Daniel C. Dauwalter and Matthew G. Mitro) .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Washburn County)
    Kark's Canoeing and Kayaking Guide to 309 Wisconsin Streams By Richard Kark May 2015 Introduction A Badger Stream Love Affair My fascination with rivers started near my hometown of Osage, Iowa on the Cedar River. High school buddies and I fished the river and canoe-camped along its lovely limestone bluffs. In 1969 I graduated from St. Olaf College in Minnesota and soon paddled my first Wisconsin stream. With my college sweetheart I spent three days and two nights canoe-camping from Taylors Falls to Stillwater on the St. Croix River. “Sweet Caroline” by Neil Diamond blared from our transistor radio as we floated this lovely stream which was designated a National Wild and Scenic River in 1968. Little did I know I would eventually explore more than 300 other Wisconsin streams. In the late 1970s I was preoccupied by my medical studies in Milwaukee but did find the time to explore some rivers. I recall canoeing the Oconto, Chippewa, Kickapoo, “Illinois Fox,” and West Twin Rivers during those years. Several of us traveled to the Peshtigo River and rafted “Roaring Rapids” with a commercial company. At the time I could not imagine riding this torrent in a canoe. We also rafted Piers Gorge on the Menomonee River. Our guide failed to avoid Volkswagen Rock over Mishicot Falls. We flipped and I experienced the second worst “swim” of my life. Was I deterred from whitewater? Just the opposite, it seems. By the late 1970s I was a practicing physician, but I found time for Wisconsin rivers. In 1979 I signed up for the tandem whitewater clinic run by the River Touring Section of the Sierra Club’s John Muir Chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 to 2010
    KICKAPOO RIVER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT 2000 TO 2010 VALLEY STEWARDSHIP NETWORK SARAH GRAINGER, M.A.SC. DECEMBER 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Kickapoo River Watershed Assessment has been created by the Valley Stewardship Network (VSN) to provide a critical look at the health of the watershed based on surface water data. Surface water quality data, while one of many components used to assess the health of a watershed, is among the most informative. Thanks to the extraordinary commitment of citizen monitors VSN has provided a quantity of surface water quality data in the Kickapoo River Watershed that compares to that of the regulatory agencies. This assessment will review both Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and VSN data since 2000. Data was analyzed for each watershed, waterbody and station. The Kickapoo watershed was divided into five smaller watersheds as defined by the WDNR; Upper, Middle and Lower Kickapoo Watersheds, West Fork of the Kickapoo Watershed and Reads and Tainter Watershed. For the purpose of this assessment, data was separated into six assessment categories; temperature, core, nutrients, macroinvertebrate, bacteriological and chemical. Data was assessed using WDNR and US Environmental Protection Agency water quality limits and recommendations. In most cases the data available was not extensive enough for a conclusive determination. As such the data was used to provide an indication of the watershed health. The water quality data shows varying watershed health conditions. Some data shows no degradation, while other data showed evidence of human impact. Only a few streams had values that could be considered impaired by WDNR classification system. Most streams showed temperature ranges that could be classify it as a cold stream.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Contact
    WISCONSIN’S NATIONAL TREASURES Exploring Lesser-Known Recreational Areas Travelers looking to visit Wisconsin for its natural beauty will find plenty to do in some of the state’s best and lesser known recreational areas. Peacefulness and simplicity await hikers, bikers, paddlers, and adventure seekers at many Wisconsin National Parks, National Forest Service areas and other federally designated spots. For those looking to take a carefree road trip, Wisconsin scenic byways offer spectacular views. While other state parks across the country are overcrowded with visitors year round, these lesser-known Wisconsin destinations offer authentic and memorable experiences, with plenty of space for yourself, or your family. Great Wisconsin Birding & Nature Trail The Great Wisconsin Birding and Nature Trail (608/266-7012; www.wisconsinbirds.org/trail) is a mapped trail that reaches into every area of the state. Five main sites make up the trail, each in a different region of Wisconsin. Full-color viewing guides with maps and descriptions are available to download on the Great Wisconsin Birding and Nature Trail website. The guides provide visitors with descriptions of every site, along with the best places to see eagles, cranes, shorebirds, and more. In addition, the public has nominated National Forest Service properties, state natural areas, county, city and state parks, private museums, nature centers and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service properties that are included on the trail maps. Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Travelers in the northern region of Wisconsin can cruise the waters or trek the trails at the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore (715/779-3397; www.nps.gov).
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Kickapoo River Watershed (Lw05)
    MIDDLE KICKAPOO RIVER WATERSHED (LW05) he Middle Kickapoo River Watershed is located in central Vernon County, but also includes portions of Watershed At A Glance south central Monroe County and northwest Richland T 2 Drainage Area (m ): 247 County as well. This watershed includes all streams that flow to the Kickapoo River between Ontario and Readstown. The Total Stream Miles: 205.5 topography of the Middle Kickapoo River Watershed is quite severe with steep wooded hillsides and narrow valleys which Trout Stream Miles: 128.6 limits the majority of farmland in this watershed to the ridgetops. Only a small portion of the Middle Kickapoo River Sport Fishery Miles: 0 Watershed contains wetlands and they are concentrated along the Kickapoo River, Weister Creek and Warner Creek. An Lakes: None abundance of trout streams drain this watershed. Recently the section of the Kickapoo River in this watershed was classified Exceptional/Outstanding as Class II trout. Resource Waters: Cheyenne Valley Creek, Elk Creek, Camp Creek, Bufton Hollow Creek, Population of the Middle Kickapoo River Watershed for the South Bear Creek year 2000 was estimated at approximately 4,120 which includes portions of 15 townships and three villages. The fastest growing Municipalities: La Farge, community in this watershed is Ontario at nearly 17%. Ontario, Viola Table 1: Growth in Municipalities in the Watershed Major Public Lands: Municipality 1990 2000 % Change ♦ Kickapoo Valley Reserve La Farge 766 775 1.17% ♦ Wildcat Mountain State Park Ontario (part) 407 476 16.9% Concerns and Issues: Viola 644 667 3.57% ♦ Nonpoint source pollution ♦ Proliferation of spring ponds La Farge, Ontario, and Viola each have Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (WPDES) permits to discharge Initiatives and Projects: treated wastewater to the Kickapoo River.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilson Bulletin
    ^f^khn oi ™_^ The Wilson Bulletin Official Organ of the Wilson Ornithological Club An Illustrated Quarterly Magazine Devoted to the Study of Birds Edited by Lynds Jones Old Series, Volume XXV New Series, Volume XX Published by the Club, at Oberlin, Ohio Nineteen Hundred and Thirteen INDEX VOL. XXV, 1913 Acanthis bornemauni exilipes, Bunting, Indigo, 80, 140, 145. 147. Lark, 197. linaria linaria, 147. Lazuli, 197. Accipiter velox, 15, 75. Snow, 17, 43, 46, 94, 147. Actitis macularia, 74. Buteo borealis, 75. Agelaius plioeniceus, 78. calurus, 195. pliceniceus, 36. platypterus, 75, 141. sonorieusis, 196. Butorides virescens, 73. Aidemosyne, 208. Aix sponsa, 73. Ammodramus savannarum aus- Calcarius lapponicus lapponicus, tralis, 79. 18. Anas platyrhynchos, 73. Calamospiza melanocorys, 197. rubripes tristis, 73. Callipepla squamata squamata, Antbus I'ubescens, 19, 83. 195. Antrostomus vociferus, 76. Canacbites canadensis canace, Aqulla cbrysaetos, 146. 144, 146. Aramiis, 206. Capito maculicoronatus pirren- Arcbibuteo lagopus sancti-joban- sis, 46. nis, 75. Cardinal, 80, 86, 87, 95, 150, 151, Arcbilocbus colubris, 77, 153. 205. Ardea berodias, 73. Arizona, 197. Astragalinus tristis, 79. Cardinalis cardinalis, 80. tristis, 17, 21-26. superbus, 197. Astur atricapillus, 143, 146. Carpodacus mexicanus frontalis, Avocet, 195. 197. purpureus, 79. Bseolopbus bicolor, 84. Catbird, 83, 85, 86, 139, 157, Barbet, Mount Pirri, 46. 166-187. Blackbird, 62, 194, 196. Catbartes aura septentrionalis,. Red-winged, 43, 78. 195. 142, Rusty, 17, 43, 78, 86, Centrocercus uropbasianus, 90. 145. Certbia familiaris americana, Bluebird, 7, 41, 43, 85, 95. 19, 84, 147. IVJbuntain, 199. Ceryle, alcyon, 76. Bob-wbite, 74, 95, 99. alcyon, 15. Maslied, 192. Cbsetura pelagica, 77.
    [Show full text]
  • Grained Sediment and Other Limiting Variables on Trout Habitat for Selected Streams in Wisconsin by Barbara C
    Determination of the Effects of Fine- Grained Sediment and Other Limiting Variables on Trout Habitat for Selected Streams in Wisconsin By Barbara C. Scudder, Jeffery W. Selbig, and Robert J. Waschbusch U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 00-435 Prepared in cooperation with the WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Middleton, Wisconsin 2000 uses science for a changing world U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 8505 Research Way Box 25286 Middleton, Wl 53562-3586 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................... ] Purpose and scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Study area...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Kickapoo River Watershed: a Focus on Water Protection and Stewardship FOREWORD
    Produced by the Valley Stewardship Network The Kickapoo River Watershed: A Focus on Water Protection and Stewardship FOREWORD For over a decade, Valley Stewardship Network has scientific report that investigates the water quality focused on local water quality through water quality of the Kickapoo Watershed. Data gathered from monitoring and public outreach programs. Valley 2000-2010 by VSN’s dedicated citizen-based Stewardship Network’s dedicated volunteer water volunteer water monitors and by Wisconsin’s monitors have recorded over 10,000 data points Department of Natural Resources formed the basis from the Kickapoo Watershed. The analysis of this for this report, which gives those who live, work and data suggests areas of high quality waterways as play within the Kickapoo a glimpse into the health well as areas needing improvement. Clean water of our streams and rivers. is essential to healthy food and local communities, and because water quality is greatly influenced by In many cases, there was not enough data to make our actions, we can all play an important role in conclusive determinations affecting the health conserving and protecting this valuable resource. of each stream and river within the watershed. However, the assessment does offer a rare snapshot Characterized by unique beauty and ecological of the state of our unique water resources at this diversity, the Kickapoo Watershed lies in the heart point in time. While many of the streams of the of the Driftless Region, an area untouched by Kickapoo valleys are high quality and considered glaciers. This watershed, defined as an “area of land in good health, some water bodies exhibit definite that catches rain and snow and drains into a marsh, indications of compromised water health.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Kickapoo River Watersheds Watershed
    Wisconsin Lower Kickapoo River Watersheds Watershed 2011 Water Quality Management Plan Update Lower Wisconsin Basin, Wisconsin November 2011 Th e Lower Kickapoo River Watershed lies entirely within Crawford County. It includes the reach of the Kickapoo River from Gays Mills downstream to where the Kickapoo meets the Wisconsin River. As with other watersheds in this system, tributary streams have a fairly steep gradient. A signifi cant per- centage of land is in woodland. Some sizable wetland complexes exist in the Kickapoo River fl oodplain. Contents Th e Kickapoo River Wildlife Area and a Watershed Details . 1 portion of the Lower Wisconsin River State Population and Land Use . 1 Riverway comprise most of the lands in public Hydrology . 2 ownership in this watershed. Th ree munici- Ecological Landscapes . 2 pal wastewater treatment facilities discharge Historical Note . 3 in the watershed: Gays Mills, Eastman and Map 1: Lower Kickapoo River Watershed Watershed Condition . 5 Wauzeka. Th e Crawford County Animal Priority Issues . 5 Waste Management Plan ranked this watershed as a priority watershed for animal waste-caused Overall Condition . 5 water pollution problems. Th e Crawford County Soil Erosion Control Plan ranked the Plum Rivers and Streams . 5 and Otter Creeks Subwatershed second priority for controlling soil erosion. Lake Health . 8 Wetland Health . 8 Groundwater . 9 Watershed Details Point and Nonpoint Pollution . 10 Waters of Note . 10 Table 1: Lower Kickapoo River Trout Waters . 10 Population and Land Use Watershed Land Use Outstanding and Exceptional Resource Forest and agriculture dominate land use Percent of Waters . 11 Land Use Acres in this watershed with 50% and 41% of the Area Impaired Waters.
    [Show full text]