Anti-Islamic Reactions in the EU After the Terrorist Acts Against the USA
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EUROPEAN MONITORING CENTRE ON RACISM AND XENOPHOBIA OBSERVATOIRE EUROPÉEN DES PHÉNOMÈNES RACISTES ET XÉNOPHOBES EUROPÄISCHE STELLE ZUR BEOBACHTUNG VON RASSISMUS UND FREMDENFEINDLICHKEIT Anti-Islamic reactions in the EU after the terrorist acts against the USA A collection of country reports from RAXEN National Focal Points (NFPs) Second report: Reactions from 25th September to 19th October The national reports are only available in English Réactions anti-islamiques dans l’UE à la suite des actes terroristes commis à l’encontre des États-Unis Un recueil des rapports nationaux des points focaux nationaux (PFN) de RAXEN Second rapport: réactions du 25 septembre au 19 octobre Les rapports nationaux sont uniquement disponible en Anglais Anti-Islamische Reaktionen in der EU nach den Terroranschlägen gegen die USA Eine Zusammenstellung von Länderberichten der nationalen Anlaufstellen von RAXEN Zweiter Bericht: Reaktionen im Zeitraum vom 25. September bis 19. Oktober Die Länderberichte stehen nur in Englischer Sprache zur Verfügungr Annex NATIONAL REPORTS These national reports are edited versions of the reports written by the National Focal Points (NFP) of the RAXEN international network following a request of the EUMC. The task of the RAXEN network is to collect reliable and comparable data (including examples of and models for “good practices”) at the European level on the phenomena of racism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism in order to help the EU and its Member States to take measures or formulate courses of action. This time it is composed by 14 NFPs. For further information please visit the EUMC homepage http://eumc.eu.int Table of Content Table of Content ..............................................................2 AUSTRIA ........................................................................3 BELGIUM .....................................................................12 DENMARK ..................................................................18 FINLAND......................................................................24 FRANCE........................................................................28 GERMANY ...................................................................31 GREECE........................................................................34 IRELAND......................................................................38 ITALY............................................................................41 LUXEMBURG ..............................................................44 THE NETHERLANDS..................................................46 PORTUGAL ..................................................................52 SPAIN............................................................................59 SWEDEN.......................................................................63 UNITED KINGDOM ....................................................68 2 AUSTRIA Research Centre "Discourse, Politics, Identity" (DPI), in cooperation with the Institut für Konfliktforschung (IKF) and the Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Menschenrechte (BIM) (located at the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW)) In comparison to the first period of observation (from September 11 to September 25) the second period (from September 25 to October 19) includes much more reactions related to the terrorist attacks in the USA. This is not only due to the fact that the second period covers three and a half weeks, while the first period just covered 14 days, and that the topic of the attacks and their consequences (including the military reprisal by the USA) is still one of the main issues in public and private discourses extensively reported by the Austrian media. It also relates to the fact that - after the first shock about the horrible attacks has slowly faded away - the general initial prudence and wariness, characterised by deep compassion with the terrorists’ victims, has made way for political “everyday life”. Some Austrian politicians have started to make political (including party political) capital out of the disastrous attacks – which has given rise to intensive controversial discussions in public. 1. Acts of violence or aggression towards ethnic, cultural, or religious minorities, especially Muslim/Islamic communities 1.1. Acts of violence or aggression The increase in media coverage related to the terrorist attacks and their consequences can also be related to the increase of aggressive acts against Islamic communities in Austria. There is a growing number of verbal threats via telephone and letters directed against the Islamic Community. According to a spokesperson of the Islamic Faith Community (“Islamische Glaubensgemeinschaft”), no reports on physical attacks on Muslims have been made to them until now. However, this perception of the present situation is not shared by other NGOs (see below) and regional Islamic communities like the one in Upper Austria (see http://www.religionsfreiheit.at/zorres.htm). In contrast, verbal harassment stays on the scene. Many Muslim citizens feel at least molested by jokes in their workplaces, in the streets or in public transport. Popular expressions are “What have you done again?” and, in allusion to Austrian history, “What for did our ancestors fight off the Turks, when we now let them sweep in like a flood?”. Members of the Islamic community also experience the need of many people talking about issues of Islamic religion and fundamentalism to them. The spokesperson already mentioned said: “People want to talk and check – even people that do not know me. Sometimes I feel like I should carry a sign saying: ‘Don’t worry, I’m also against terrorism’`.” 1.1.1. ZARA Report The NGO ZARA – providing counselling to victims and witnesses of racism - reports two very awful cases: The first one is a physical attack on a Turkish woman in Vienna, who was beaten by a man when just standing in the street. He walked up to her and without any warning, hit her in the 3 face and shouted “stop terrorism”. Then he went off. The woman was injured and the case was notified to the police. The second incident concerns a man of Arabic descent, who applied for a job advertised. In reaction to his very polite letter of interest and CV he received an e-mail insulting him as “crazy Muslim” and suggesting for him to “go to Afghanistan and die”. 1.1.2. The defilement of 28 graves in the Islamic part of the municipal cemetery in Linz (October 6) Another striking act of anti-Islamic violence has caused a good deal of alarm in Austria and especially among members of the Austrian Islamic community. On Saturday, October 6, an Upper Austrian Muslim discovered 28 graves in the Islamic part of the municipal cemetery in Linz that had been defiled during the night. The grave-stones of these 28 graves, which were in part cemented in, were pulled out of their anchorage and knocked over by feet, the grave parts made of wood were ripped off. The damage of property approximately amounts to ATS 300.000 (= € 21.801,85). In a first reaction, this offending and provocative violation was heavily condemned by Günther Ahmed Rusznak, speaker of the Islamic Community in Upper Austria, as well as by Andrea Kuntzl from the Social Democratic Party and by Alexander van der Bellen from the Greens (see Der Standard, October 8). Rusznak explicitly viewed the defilement as an anti- Islamic reaction to the terrorist attacks on September 11 in the USA. He reported that the Austrian Muslim citizens had not suffered any direct physical aggression since the attacks in New York and Washington until then (= October 8), but massive verbal assaults. According to Rusznak, women with headscarves have increasingly been insulted and Muslims have been called “terrorists”. Since everything starts as a small thing, so Rusznak, things must be nipped in the bud. All in all, (subliminal) fear for “islamophobia” seems to have grown among Muslims (see Der Standard, October 8). In contrast to Rusznaks view, the Upper Austrian political representatives of the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP), of the Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) and the Austrian Freedom party (FPÖ), who all condemned the defilement, unison argued that Muslims in Upper Austria needed not fear for massive hostilities (see Der Standard, October 10). The head of Upper Austria’s Government, Josef Pühringer (ÖVP), declared that there would not be a “revenge on suspicion” and that making Muslims in Upper Austria responsible for the terrorist attacks in the USA would be equivalent to “Sippenhaftung” (i.e. to a liability of all the members of the Islamic community for the crimes of a few). Pühringer decisively rejected such a “Sippenhaftung” and pleaded for a peaceful “living side by side of religions and cultures”. That verbal aggression against Muslims is nothing unusual in Austria, was also reported by Hüsamettin Büyükkal, the president of the Islamic Religious Community in Linz, Upper Austria and Salzburg, at a press conference following the “inter-religious hour of commemoration” (see next section). However, following Büyükkal there has not been any institution of legal proceedings against anybody for racist attacks against Muslims in Upper Austria since the beginning of 2001 (= including October 10, see Der Standard, October 10). In his press conference, Büyükkal condemned the terrorist attacks from September 11 in a declaration of several pages in length. The president of the Islamic Religious Community in Linz, Upper Austria and Salzburg stated that the terrorist attacks must not become an occasion for transforming