Innate Control of Adaptive Immunity Via Remodeling of Lymph Node Feed Arteriole
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IFM Innate Immunity Infographic
UNDERSTANDING INNATE IMMUNITY INTRODUCTION The immune system is comprised of two arms that work together to protect the body – the innate and adaptive immune systems. INNATE ADAPTIVE γδ T Cell Dendritic B Cell Cell Macrophage Antibodies Natural Killer Lymphocites Neutrophil T Cell CD4+ CD8+ T Cell T Cell TIME 6 hours 12 hours 1 week INNATE IMMUNITY ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY Innate immunity is the body’s first The adaptive, or acquired, immune line of immunological response system is activated when the innate and reacts quickly to anything that immune system is not able to fully should not be present. address a threat, but responses are slow, taking up to a week to fully respond. Pathogen evades the innate Dendritic immune system T Cell Cell Through antigen Pathogen presentation, the dendritic cell informs T cells of the pathogen, which informs Macrophage B cells B Cell B cells create antibodies against the pathogen Macrophages engulf and destroy Antibodies label invading pathogens pathogens for destruction Scientists estimate innate immunity comprises approximately: The adaptive immune system develops of the immune memory of pathogen exposures, so that 80% system B and T cells can respond quickly to eliminate repeat invaders. IMMUNE SYSTEM AND DISEASE If the immune system consistently under-responds or over-responds, serious diseases can result. CANCER INFLAMMATION Innate system is TOO ACTIVE Innate system NOT ACTIVE ENOUGH Cancers grow and spread when tumor Certain diseases trigger the innate cells evade detection by the immune immune system to unnecessarily system. The innate immune system is respond and cause excessive inflammation. responsible for detecting cancer cells and This type of chronic inflammation is signaling to the adaptive immune system associated with autoimmune and for the destruction of the cancer cells. -
Innate Immunity in the Lung: How Epithelial Cells Fight Against
Copyright #ERSJournals Ltd 2004 EurRespir J 2004;23: 327– 333 EuropeanRespiratory Journal DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00098803 ISSN0903-1936 Printedin UK –allrights reserved REVIEW Innateimmunity in the lung: how epithelialcells ght against respiratorypathogens R. Bals*,P.S. Hiemstra # Innateimmunity in the lung: how epithelial cells ® ghtagainst respiratory pathogens *Deptof Internal Medicine, Division of R Bals, P S Hiemstra #ERS JournalsLtd 2004 PulmonaryMedicine, Hospital of the Uni- versityof Marburg, Philipps-University, ABSTRACT: Thehuman lung is exposed to a largenumber of airborne pathogens as a # resultof the daily inhalation of 10,000 litres of air Theobservation that respiratory Marburg,Germany; Deptof Pulmonology, LeidenUniversity Medical Center, Leiden, infectionsare nevertheless rare is testimony to the presence of anef®cient host defence TheNetherlands systemat the mucosal surface of the lung Theairway epithelium is strategically positioned at the interface with the Correspondence:P S Hiemstra,Dept of environment,and thus plays a keyrole in this host defence system Recognition Pulmonology,Leiden University Medical systemsemployed by airwayepithelial cells to respond to microbialexposure include the Center, P O Box9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The actionof the toll-like receptors Netherlands Theairway epithelium responds to such exposure by increasing its production of Fax:31 715266927 mediatorssuch as cytokines, chemokines and antimicrobial peptides Recent® ndings E-mail: p s hiemstra@lumc nl indicatethe importance of these peptides -
Corpora Amylacea Act As Containers That Remove Waste Products from the Brain
Corpora amylacea act as containers that remove waste products from the brain Marta Ribaa,b,c,1, Elisabet Augéa,b,c,1, Joan Campo-Sabariza,d, David Moral-Antera,d, Laura Molina-Porcele, Teresa Ximelise, Ruth Ferrera,d, Raquel Martín-Venegasa,d, Carme Pelegría,b,c,2, and Jordi Vilaplanaa,b,c,2 aSecció de Fisiologia, Departament de Bioquímica i Fisiologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; bInstitut de Neurociències, Universitat de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; cCentros de Biomedicina en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), 28031 Madrid, Spain; dInstitut de Recerca en Nutrició i Seguretat Alimentàries (INSA-UB), Universitat de Barcelona, 08291 Barcelona, Spain; and eNeurological Tissue Bank of the Biobanc- Hospital Clinic-Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain Edited by Lawrence Steinman, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, and approved November 5, 2019 (received for review August 8, 2019) Corpora amylacea (CA) in the human brain are granular bodies 6). Nonetheless, we observed that CA contain glycogen synthase formed by polyglucosan aggregates that amass waste products of (GS), an indispensable enzyme for polyglucosan formation, and different origins. They are generated by astrocytes, mainly during also ubiquitin and protein p62, both associated with processes of aging and neurodegenerative conditions, and are located predom- elimination of waste substances (5). The relationship between CA inantly in periventricular and subpial regions. This study shows that and waste substances is recurrent in the literature. Already in 1999, CA are released from these regions to the cerebrospinal fluid and after a detailed and complete review, Cavanagh indicated that “CA are present in the cervical lymph nodes, into which cerebrospinal functions seem to be directed towards trapping and sequestration fluid drains through the meningeal lymphatic system. -
Adaptive Immune Systems
Immunology 101 (for the Non-Immunologist) Abhinav Deol, MD Assistant Professor of Oncology Wayne State University/ Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit MI Presentation originally prepared and presented by Stephen Shiao MD, PhD Department of Radiation Oncology Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Disclosures Bristol-Myers Squibb – Contracted Research What is the immune system? A network of proteins, cells, tissues and organs all coordinated for one purpose: to defend one organism from another It is an infinitely adaptable system to combat the complex and endless variety of pathogens it must address Outline Structure of the immune system Anatomy of an immune response Role of the immune system in disease: infection, cancer and autoimmunity Organs of the Immune System Major organs of the immune system 1. Bone marrow – production of immune cells 2. Thymus – education of immune cells 3. Lymph Nodes – where an immune response is produced 4. Spleen – dual role for immune responses (especially antibody production) and cell recycling Origins of the Immune System B-Cell B-Cell Self-Renewing Common Progenitor Natural Killer Lymphoid Cell Progenitor Thymic T-Cell Selection Hematopoetic T-Cell Stem Cell Progenitor Dendritic Cell Myeloid Progenitor Granulocyte/M Macrophage onocyte Progenitor The Immune Response: The Art of War “Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster.” -Sun Tzu, The Art of War Immunity: Two Systems and Their Key Players Adaptive Immunity Innate Immunity Dendritic cells (DC) B cells Phagocytes (Macrophages, Neutrophils) Natural Killer (NK) Cells T cells Dendritic Cells: “Commanders-in-Chief” • Function: Serve as the gateway between the innate and adaptive immune systems. -
Qnas with Max D. Cooper and Jacques F. A. P. Miller
QNAS QnAswithMaxD.CooperandJacquesF.A.P.Miller QNAS Brian Doctrow, Science Writer Anyone who has ever contracted chicken pox can thank the adaptive immune system for future pro- tection against the disease. It is also thanks to this system that vaccines prevent diseases. The adaptive immune system provides organisms with a memory of past infections, enabling the body to quickly kill returning infections before they can do significant damage. Immunologists Jacques F. A. P. Miller and Max D. Cooper determined that adaptive immunity requires 2 distinct cell types that perform comple- mentary functions. Miller’s findings, published in the early 1960s in Lancet (1) and Proceedings of the Royal Society (2), showed that the ability to distinguish one’s own cells from foreign cells, a key feature of the adap- tive immune system, depends on lymphocytes, now known as T cells, matured in an organ called the thy- mus. Subsequently, Cooper reported in Nature (3) that Max Dale Cooper. Image courtesy of Georgia Research antibody production depends on a separate set of Alliance/Billy Howard. lymphocytes, dubbed B cells. The division of labor between T and B cells is a fundamental organizing principle of the adaptive immune system, the discov- did cancer research. I started working on leukemia and ery of which laid the groundwork for modern immu- this gave me an interest in lymphocytes. nology and made possible many subsequent medical advances, including monoclonal antibody produc- Cooper: I became interested through patients that I tion, vaccine development, and checkpoint inhibi- was taking care of: Children that had deficient immune tion therapies for cancer. -
Human Anatomy As Related to Tumor Formation Book Four
SEER Program Self Instructional Manual for Cancer Registrars Human Anatomy as Related to Tumor Formation Book Four Second Edition U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutesof Health SEER PROGRAM SELF-INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL FOR CANCER REGISTRARS Book 4 - Human Anatomy as Related to Tumor Formation Second Edition Prepared by: SEER Program Cancer Statistics Branch National Cancer Institute Editor in Chief: Evelyn M. Shambaugh, M.A., CTR Cancer Statistics Branch National Cancer Institute Assisted by Self-Instructional Manual Committee: Dr. Robert F. Ryan, Emeritus Professor of Surgery Tulane University School of Medicine New Orleans, Louisiana Mildred A. Weiss Los Angeles, California Mary A. Kruse Bethesda, Maryland Jean Cicero, ART, CTR Health Data Systems Professional Services Riverdale, Maryland Pat Kenny Medical Illustrator for Division of Research Services National Institutes of Health CONTENTS BOOK 4: HUMAN ANATOMY AS RELATED TO TUMOR FORMATION Page Section A--Objectives and Content of Book 4 ............................... 1 Section B--Terms Used to Indicate Body Location and Position .................. 5 Section C--The Integumentary System ..................................... 19 Section D--The Lymphatic System ....................................... 51 Section E--The Cardiovascular System ..................................... 97 Section F--The Respiratory System ....................................... 129 Section G--The Digestive System ......................................... 163 Section -
The Size of Lymph Nodes in the Neck on Sonograms As a Radiologic Criterion for Metastasis: How Reliable Is It?
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:695–700, April 1998 The Size of Lymph Nodes in the Neck on Sonograms as a Radiologic Criterion for Metastasis: How Reliable Is It? Michiel W. M. van den Brekel, Jonas A. Castelijns, and Gordon B. Snow PURPOSE: A definition of cut-off points for nodal size is essential to determine whether cervical lymph nodes are metastatic or not. Because the currently used size criteria are defined for random populations of patients with head and neck cancer, we set out to study whether these criteria are optimal for patients without palpable metastases in different levels of the neck. We defined optimal size criteria for sonography by calculating the sensitivity and specificity of different size cut-off points. METHODS: We compared the sensitivity and specificity of different size cut-off points as measured on sonograms for various levels in the neck in a series of 117 patients with and 131 patients without palpable neck metastases. RESULTS: A minimum axial diameter of 7 mm for level II and 6 mm for the rest of the neck revealed the optimal compromise between sensitivity and specificity in necks without palpable metastases. For all necks together (with and without palpable metastases), the criteria were 1 to 2 mm larger. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the current sonographic size criteria used for random patient populations are not optimal for necks without palpable metastases, nor can the same cut-off points be used for all levels in the neck. The management of lymph node metastases in the cious lymph nodes may convert both selective neck neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the treatment and a wait-and-see policy to more secure upper air and food passages is a continuing source of comprehensive treatment of all levels of the neck (6). -
Brain-To-Cervical Lymph Node Signaling After Stroke
ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13324-w OPEN Brain-to-cervical lymph node signaling after stroke Elga Esposito1, Bum Ju Ahn1, Jingfei Shi1,2, Yoshihiko Nakamura 1,3, Ji Hyun Park1, Emiri T. Mandeville 1, Zhanyang Yu1, Su Jing Chan 1,4, Rakhi Desai1, Ayumi Hayakawa1, Xunming Ji2, Eng H. Lo1,5*& Kazuhide Hayakawa1,5* After stroke, peripheral immune cells are activated and these systemic responses may amplify brain damage, but how the injured brain sends out signals to trigger systemic inflammation remains unclear. Here we show that a brain-to-cervical lymph node (CLN) 1234567890():,; pathway is involved. In rats subjected to focal cerebral ischemia, lymphatic endothelial cells proliferate and macrophages are rapidly activated in CLNs within 24 h, in part via VEGF-C/ VEGFR3 signalling. Microarray analyses of isolated lymphatic endothelium from CLNs of ischemic mice confirm the activation of transmembrane tyrosine kinase pathways. Blockade of VEGFR3 reduces lymphatic endothelial activation, decreases pro-inflammatory macro- phages, and reduces brain infarction. In vitro, VEGF-C/VEGFR3 signalling in lymphatic endothelial cells enhances inflammatory responses in co-cultured macrophages. Lastly, surgical removal of CLNs in mice significantly reduces infarction after focal cerebral ischemia. These findings suggest that modulating the brain-to-CLN pathway may offer therapeutic opportunities to ameliorate systemic inflammation and brain injury after stroke. 1 Neuroprotection Research Laboratory, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. 2 China-America Institute of Neuroscience, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 3 Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Jonan, Fukuoka, Japan. -
The Role of Microbiota in the Pathogenesis of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
biology Review The Role of Microbiota in the Pathogenesis of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Megan R. Gillespie 1, Vikrant Rai 2 , Swati Agrawal 3 and Kalyana C. Nandipati 3,* 1 School of Medicine, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Translational Research, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA 91766, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Surgery, Creighton University School of Medicine, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-402-280-5292 Simple Summary: Esophageal adenocarcinoma has a poor 5-year survival rate and is among the highest mortality cancers. Changes in the esophageal microbiome have been associated with cancer pathogenesis; however, the molecular mechanism remains obscure. This review article critically analyzes the molecular mechanisms through which microbiota may mediate the development and progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma and its precursors-gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus. It summarizes changes in esophageal microbiome composition in normal and pathologic states and subsequently discusses the role of altered microbiota in disease progression. The potential role of esophageal microbiota in protecting against the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma is also discussed. By doing so, this article highlights specific directions for future research developing microbiome-mediated therapeutics for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Abstract: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is associated with poor overall five-year survival. The Citation: Gillespie, M.R.; Rai, V.; incidence of esophageal cancer is on the rise, especially in Western societies, and the pathophysiologic Agrawal, S.; Nandipati, K.C. The Role of Microbiota in the Pathogenesis of mechanisms by which EAC develops are of extreme interest. -
Human Autoimmunity and Associated Diseases
Human Autoimmunity and Associated Diseases Human Autoimmunity and Associated Diseases Edited by Kenan Demir and Selim Görgün Human Autoimmunity and Associated Diseases Edited by Kenan Demir and Selim Görgün This book first published 2021 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2021 by Kenan Demir and Selim Görgün and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-6910-1 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-6910-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ...................................................................................................... viii Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 Introduction to the Immune System Kemal Bilgin Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 10 Immune System Embryology Rümeysa Göç Chapter Three ............................................................................................. 18 Immune System Histology Filiz Yılmaz Chapter Four .............................................................................................. 36 Tolerance Mechanisms and Autoimmunity -
Immunology 101
Immunology 101 Justin Kline, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine Section of Hematology/Oncology Committee on Immunology University of Chicago Medicine Disclosures • I served as a consultant on Advisory Boards for Merck and Seattle Genetics. • I will discuss non-FDA-approved therapies for cancer 2 Outline • Innate and adaptive immune systems – brief intro • How immune responses against cancer are generated • Cancer antigens in the era of cancer exome sequencing • Dendritic cells • T cells • Cancer immune evasion • Cancer immunotherapies – brief intro 3 The immune system • Evolved to provide protection against invasive pathogens • Consists of a variety of cells and proteins whose purpose is to generate immune responses against micro-organisms • The immune system is “educated” to attack foreign invaders, but at the same time, leave healthy, self-tissues unharmed • The immune system can sometimes recognize and kill cancer cells • 2 main branches • Innate immune system – Initial responders • Adaptive immune system – Tailored attack 4 The immune system – a division of labor Innate immune system • Initial recognition of non-self (i.e. infection, cancer) • Comprised of cells (granulocytes, monocytes, dendritic cells and NK cells) and proteins (complement) • Recognizes non-self via receptors that “see” microbial structures (cell wall components, DNA, RNA) • Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) • Necessary for priming adaptive immune responses 5 The immune system – a division of labor Adaptive immune system • Provides nearly unlimited diversity of receptors to protect the host from infection • B cells and T cells • Have unique receptors generated during development • B cells produce antibodies which help fight infection • T cells patrol for infected or cancerous cells • Recognize “foreign” or abnormal proteins on the cell surface • 100,000,000 unique T cells are present in all of us • Retains “memory” against infections and in some cases, cancer. -
Mind, Brain, Immunity
Mind, Brain, Immunity st Ann Fink, Ph.D. Bioscience in the 21 Fri 12/07/2018 Century Today’s Plan 1. Immunity: a review 2. Central nervous system (CNS) structure 3. Cellular, molecular and structural features of CNS and Immune function 4. The lymphatic system and beyond 5. Health relevance of mind-brain-immunity connections 2 What happens when foreign tissue is grafted into the body? Into a leg? Into the brain? Into the leg and then into the brain? Is the brain immune privileged? 3 Innate and adaptive immunity Less specific but faster: mediates More specific immunity: “learns” inflammation, can be “called” by about pathogens (bacteria, adaptive immune system. viruses, etc.) through antibodies. 4 Lymph nodes: an structural network mediating immunity and fluid / molecular exchange in tissues 5 The central, peripheral, and autonomic nervous system 6 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMHT0024762/ Meninges cover the central nervous system 3 Layers: 1. Dura mater (outer) 2. Arachnoid: (middle) 3. Pia mater (inner) Saboori & Sadegh (2015). Anatomy research international, 2015, 279814. 7 And cerebrospinal fluid bathes the brain. By © Nevit Dilmen, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=93 Jessen et al. Neurochem Res. 2015, 40(12): 2583–2599. 88427 8 The blood-brain barrier Astrocytes form a gateway between the bloodstream and the brain. Jessen et al. Neurochem Res. 2015, 40(12): 2583–2599. 9 Based on this information, how could the immune system and central nervous system interact? Your answers here: 10 Immune – CNS interactions Areas of overlap? By Volker Brinkmann - (November 2005).