DOCSLIB.ORG

Greenbushes Vertebrate, SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greenbushes Vertebrate, SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Roy Hill Vertebrate Fauna Desktop Review Greenbushes Vertebrate, SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Talison Lithium Limited 10 April 2018 Page 0 of 85 Greenbushes Fauna Desktop Assessment DOCUMENT STATUS Revision Approved for Issue to Author Review / Approved for Issue No. Name Date C. Knuckey, B. 1 Downing, D. Main, C. Knuckey, B. Durrant L. Perenzin 20/03/18 S. Callan 2 B. Downing C. Knuckey L. Perenzin 03/04/18 3 C. Knuckey C. Knuckey L. Perenzin 10/04/18 “IMPORTANT NOTE” Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of Biologic Environmental Survey Pty Ltd (“Biologic”). All enquiries should be directed to Biologic. We have prepared this report for the sole purposes of Talison Lithium Limited (“Client”) for the specific purpose only for which it is supplied. This report is strictly limited to the Purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and does not apply directly or indirectly and will not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter. In preparing this report we have made certain assumptions. We have assumed that all information and documents provided to us by the Client or as a result of a specific request or enquiry were complete, accurate and up-to-date. Where we have obtained information from a government register or database, we have assumed that the information is accurate. Where an assumption has been made, we have not made any independent investigations with respect to the matters the subject of that assumption. We are not aware of any reason why any of the assumptions are incorrect. This report is presented without the assumption of a duty of care to any other person (other than the Client) (“Third Party”). The report may not contain sufficient information for the purposes of a Third Party or for other uses. Without the prior written consent of Biologic: a) This report may not be relied on by a Third Party; and b) Biologic will not be liable to a Third Party for any loss, damage, liability or claim arising out of or incidental to a Third- Party publishing, using or relying on the facts, content, opinions or subject matter contained in this report. If a Third Party uses or relies on the facts, content, opinions or subject matter contained in this report with or without the consent of Biologic, Biologic disclaims all risk and the Third Party assumes all risk and releases and indemnifies and agrees to keep indemnified Biologic from any loss, damage, claim or liability arising directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on this report. In this note, a reference to loss and damage includes past and prospective economic loss, loss of profits, damage to property, injury to any person (including death) costs and expenses incurred in taking measures to prevent, mitigate or rectify any harm, loss of opportunity, legal costs, compensation, interest and any other direct, indirect, consequential or financial or other loss. Page | 1 Greenbushes Fauna Desktop Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Background to Protection of Fauna .................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Conservation Significance ............................................................................... 10 1.3.2 Short-range Endemism .................................................................................... 11 1.3.3 Subterranean Fauna ........................................................................................ 12 2 Environment ..................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Biogeography ....................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Climate .................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Pre-European Vegetation..................................................................................... 15 2.4 Land Use ............................................................................................................... 16 3 Methodology ..................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Vertebrate Fauna .................................................................................................. 19 3.1.1 Desktop Assessment ....................................................................................... 19 3.1.2 Taxonomy and Nomenclature .......................................................................... 20 3.1.3 Likelihood of Occurrence for Fauna of Conservation Significance ................... 20 3.2 Short-range Endemic Invertebrate Fauna .......................................................... 21 3.2.1 Desktop Assessment ....................................................................................... 21 3.3 Subterranean Fauna ............................................................................................. 22 3.3.1 Desktop Assessment ....................................................................................... 22 4 Results and Discussion ................................................................................... 23 4.1 Vertebrate Fauna .................................................................................................. 23 4.1.1 Fauna Habitats ................................................................................................ 23 4.1.1 Vertebrate Fauna ............................................................................................. 26 4.1.2 Vertebrate Fauna of Conservation Significance ............................................... 26 4.2 Short-range Endemic Invertebrate Fauna .......................................................... 39 4.2.1 Habitat Mapping............................................................................................... 39 4.2.2 Database Results ............................................................................................ 40 4.3 Subterranean Fauna ............................................................................................. 42 4.3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology ............................................................................. 42 4.3.2 Potential subterranean fauna habitat ............................................................... 42 4.3.3 Desktop Assessment ....................................................................................... 48 Page | 2 Greenbushes Fauna Desktop Assessment 4.3.4 Database Results ............................................................................................ 49 5 Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 51 5.1 Vertebrate Fauna .................................................................................................. 51 5.2 Short-range Endemic Invertebrate Fauna .......................................................... 51 5.3 Subterranean Fauna ............................................................................................. 52 6 References ........................................................................................................ 53 7 Appendices ....................................................................................................... 56 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Study Area and regional location .......................................................................................... 9 Figure 2.1: Long-term average monthly rainfall) and temperature data (BoM, 2018) .......................... 14 Figure 2.2: Pre-European vegetation of the Study Area ....................................................................... 17 Figure 2.3: Land use surrounding the Study Area ................................................................................ 18 Figure 4.1: Fauna habitats mapped over the Study Area ..................................................................... 25 Figure 4.2: Mammals of conservation significance recorded in the vicinity of the Study Area ............. 29 Figure 4.3: Species of conservation significance recorded in the vicinity of the Study Area ................ 30 Figure 4.4: Habitat suitability for SRE invertebrates ............................................................................. 41 Figure 4.5: Broad surface geology within the Study Area ..................................................................... 45 Figure 4.6: Broad bedrock geology within the Study Area .................................................................... 46 Figure 4.7: Sub-catchment and aquifers of the Study Area .................................................................. 47 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Definitions and terms for fauna of conservation significance ............................................... 10 Table 1.2: Taxonomic groups with known or likely SRE taxa in Western Australia (EPA, 2016b) ....... 11 Table 2.1: Vegetation complexes within the Study Area (Mattiske & Havel,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ATTACHMENT 8N Works Approval Application – Desktop Assessment – Supporting Flora and Fauna Information (Golder, 2017) (1777197-020-R-Rev0)
    ATTACHMENT 8 Additional Supplementary Information ATTACHMENT 8N Works Approval Application – Desktop Assessment – Supporting Flora and Fauna Information (Golder, 2017) (1777197-020-R-Rev0) July 2017 Reference No. 1777197-015-L-Rev0 DATE 19 July 2017 REFERENCE No. 1777197-020-M-Rev0 TO Sam Mangione Alkina Holdings Pty Ltd CC FROM Jaclyn Ennis-John EMAIL [email protected] WORKS APPROVAL APPLICATION – DESKTOP ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING FLORA AND FAUNA INFORMATION 1.0 INTRODUCTION This technical memorandum presents a desktop summary of publicly available flora and fauna assessment information for the Great Southern Landfill Site. The Great Southern Landfill Site, outside York, Western Australia, was previously referred to as Allawuna Farm Landfill (AFL), and a Works Approval Application (WAA) was prepared by SUEZ and granted by the Department of Environment Regulation (DER) (now the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, DWER) on 17 March 2016; it was subsequently withdrawn by SUEZ. The WAA by SUEZ is publicly available on the DWER website. 2.0 PUBLICALLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION 2.1 WAA data The supporting works approval application provided the following information related to flora and fauna: Allawuna Landfill Vegetation and Fauna Assessment, ENV Australia Pty Ltd (October, 2012) (provided in Attachment A) 2.2 Summary of Information 2.2.1 Flora Golder (2015) summarised: A comprehensive Level 2 flora investigation of the proposed landfill area was undertaken by ENV Australia (2012) (Appendix K). The proposed landfill footprint differs to that considered in the flora assessment, although not significantly. The results and conclusions contained in the 2012 Vegetation and Fauna Assessment Report remain valid for the proposed landfill.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 8. Location of Potential Nest Trees As Classified According to Hollow-Score
    Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment Figure 8. Location of potential nest trees as classified according to hollow-score. See Appendix 11 for four finer scale maps. BAMFORD Consulting Ecologists | 41 Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment Figure 9. DBH profile of the potential black-cockatoo nesting trees surveyed. 4.3.1.1 Extrapolation of tree data The VSA areas presented in Table 7 were multiplied by the mean tree densities (Table 11) to estimate the total numbers of each (major) hollow-bearing tree species in the survey area. These values are presented in Table 13. Approximately 18 000 trees may support black-cockatoo nests within the entire survey area. Table 13. The estimated number of potential hollow-bearing trees (± SE) in the survey area. Note that not all VSAs were sampled. Vegetation and Substrate Jarrah Marri Wandoo Total Association > 500mm DBH > 500mm DBH >300mm DBH VSA 3. Marri-Jarrah woodland. 1664 ± 260 1366 ± 327 0 3030 ± 587 VSA 4. Marri-Jarrah woodland with little to no remnant 1702 ± 187 915 ± 46 0 2617 ± 233 understorey (e.g. grazed). VSA 5. Wandoo woodland (with 26 ± 26 1010 ± 616 2497 ± 700 3533 ± 1342 or without understorey). VSA 8. Paddocks with large 4535 ± 3354 3402 ± 1174 916 ± 916 8853 ± 5444 remnant trees. Overall 7927 ± 3827 6693 ± 2163 3413 ± 1616 18033 ± 7606 BAMFORD Consulting Ecologists | 42 Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment 4.3.2 Foraging The distribution of foraging habitat is mapped for Carnaby’s Black-Cockatoo and Forest Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo in Figure 10 and Figure 11 respectively (with finer scale maps presented in Appendix 12 and Appendix 13 respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK
    Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK APRIL 2015 suite 1, 216 carp st (po box 470) bega nsw 2550 australia t (02) 6492 8333 www.nghenvironmental.com.au e [email protected] unit 18, level 3, 21 mary st suite 1, 39 fitzmaurice st (po box 5464) surry hills nsw 2010 australia wagga wagga nsw 2650 australia t (02) 8202 8333 t (02) 6971 9696 unit 17, 27 yallourn st (po box 62) room 15, 341 havannah st (po box 434) fyshwick act 2609 australia bathurst nsw 2795 australia t (02) 6280 5053 0488 820 748 Document Verification Project Title: MEELUP REGIONAL PARK Project Number: 5354 Project File Name: Meelup Regional Park Level 2 Fauna Survey v20150115 Revision Date Prepared by (name) Reviewed by (name) Approved by (name) DRAFT 27/03/15 Shane Priddle Nick Graham-Higgs Nick Graham-Higgs (SW Environmental) and Greg Harewood Final 17/04/15 Shane Priddle Shane Priddle Shane Priddle (SW Environmental) (SW Environmental) (SW Environmental) nghenvironmental prints all documents on environmentally sustainable paper including paper made from bagasse (a by- product of sugar production) or recycled paper. nghenvironmental is a registered trading name of NGH Environmental Pty Ltd; ACN: 124 444 622. ABN: 31 124 444 622 suite 1, 216 carp st (po box 470) bega nsw 2550 australia t (02) 6492 8333 www.nghenvironmental.com.au e [email protected] unit 18, level 3, 21 mary st suite 1, 39 fitzmaurice st (po box 5464) surry hills nsw 2010 australia wagga wagga nsw 2650 australia t (02) 8202 8333 t (02) 6971 9696 unit 17, 27 yallourn st (po box 62) room 15, 341 havannah st (po box 434) fyshwick act 2609 australia bathurst nsw 2795 australia t (02) 6280 5053 0488 820 748 Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK CONTENTS LEVEL 2 FAUNA SURVEY .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Fauna in the Southern Forests of Western Australia
    tssN 0085-8129 ODC151:146 VertebrateFauna in The SouthernForests of WesternAustralia A Survey P. CHRISTENSEN,A. ANNELS, G. LIDDELOW AND P. SKINNER FORESTS DEPARTMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA BULLETIN94, 1985 T:- VertebrateFauna in The SouthernForests of WesternAustralia A Survey By P. CHRISTENSEN, A. ANNELS, G. LIDDELOW AND P. SKINNER Edited by Liana ChristensenM.A. (w.A.I.T.) Preparedfor Publicationby Andrew C.A. Cribb B.A. (U.W.A.) P.J. McNamara Acting Conservator of Forcsts 1985 I I r FRONT COVER The Bush R.at (Rattus fuscipes): the most abundantof the native mammals recordedby the surueyteams in WesternAustralia's southernforests. Coverphotograph: B. A. & A. C. WELLS Printed in WesternAustralia Publishedby the ForestsDepartmeDt of WesternAustralia Editor MarianneR.L. Lewis AssistantEditor Andrew C.A. Cribb DesignTrish Ryder CPl9425/7/85- Bf Atthority WILLIAM BENBOW,Aciing Cov€mmenaPrinter, Wesrern Ausrralia + Contents Page SUMMARY SECTION I-INTRODUCTION HistoricalBackground. Recent Perspectives SECTION II-DESCRIPTION OF SURVEY AREA Boundariesand PhysicalFeatures 3 Geology 3 Soils 3 Climate 6 Vegetation 6 VegetationTypes. 8 SECTION III-SURVEY METHODS 13 SECTION IV-SURVEY RESULTSAND LIST OF SPECIES. l6 (A) MAMMALS Discussionof Findings. l6 List of Species (i) IndigenousSpecies .17 (ii) IntroducedSpecies .30 (B) BIRDS Discussionof Findings List of Species .34 (C) REPTILES Discussionof Findings. List of Species. .49 (D) AMPHIBIANS Discussionof Findings. 55 List of Species. 55 (E) FRESHWATER FISH Discussionof Findings. .59 List of Species (i) IndigenousSpecies 59 (ii) IntroducedSpecies 6l SECTION V-GENERALDISCUSSION 63 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 68 REFERENCES 69 APPENDICES I-Results from Fauna Surveys 1912-t982 72 II-Results from Other ResearchStudies '74 Within The SurveyArea 1970-1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilbara Project Short-Range Endemic Invertebrate Fauna Survey
    Short-Range Endemic Invertebrate Fauna Report: FerrAus Pilbara Project Prepared for FerrAus Ltd Final Report 5HY October 2010 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1 Short-range Endemic Invertebrate Fauna Survey Final Report FerrAus Pilbara Project FerrAus Ltd Short-range Endemic Invertebrate Fauna Survey 3URMHFW)HUU$XV3LOEDUD3URMHFW )LQDO5HSRUW5HY October 2010 Authors: Conor O’Neill and Jarrad Clark Reviewer: Melanie White Prepared for FerrAus Ltd Prepared by: Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd © 2010 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd The information contained in this report is solely for the use of the Client for the purpose in which it has been prepared and Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. Any person or organisation wishing to quote or reproduce any section of this report may only do so with the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd or FerrAus Ltd. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1/511 Wanneroo Road BALCATTA WA 6021 P: 08 9345 1608 F: 08 6313 0680 E: [email protected] Project code: 952-DC-FER-SRE Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd i Short-range Endemic Invertebrate Fauna Survey Final Report FerrAus Pilbara Project FerrAus Ltd TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Weld Range Haul Road SRE Report
    NOVEMBER 2011 SINOSTEEL MIDWEST CORPORATION WELD RANGE HAUL ROAD SHORT RANGE ENDEMIC SURVEY This page has been left blank intentionally SINOSTEEL MIDWEST CORPORATION WELD RANGE HAUL ROAD SHORT RANGE ENDEMIC INVERTEBRATE SURVEY Sinosteel Midwest Corporaton Weld Range Haul Road Short Range Endemic Invertebrate Survey Document Status Approved for Issue Rev Author Reviewer/s Date Name Distributed To Date A L. Quinn 1 N. Dight M. Davis 4/11/11 M. Davis W. Ennor 4/11/11 2 N. Dight M. Davis 22/11/1 M. Davis W. Ennor 24/11/11 ecologia Environment (2011). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of Sinosteel Midwest Corporation and/or ecologia Environment. Restrictions on Use This report has been prepared specifically for Sinosteel Midwest Corporation. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any statement, study, report, application, prospectus, loan, or other agreement document, without the express approval of Sinosteel Midwest Corporation and/or ecologia Environment. ecologia Environment 1025 Wellington Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 Phone: 08 9322 1944 Fax: 08 9322 1599 Email: [email protected] November 2011 i Sinosteel Midwest Corporaton Weld Range Haul Road Short Range Endemic Invertebrate Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................VI
    [Show full text]
  • Eg the Short Range-Endemics of the Pilbara Bioregion
    Appendix 3 Supporting Technical Studies Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Prepared for: Covalent Lithium January 2019 Final Report May 2017 Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Bennelongia Pty Ltd 5 Bishop Street Jolimont WA 6014 P: (08) 9285 8722 F: (08) 9285 8811 E: [email protected] ABN: 55 124 110 167 Report Number: 298 Report Version Prepared by Reviewed by Submitted to Client Method Date Draft Anton Mittra Stuart Halse Email 31 May 2017 Final Stuart Halse Email 24 November 17 Final V2 Anton Mittra Email 14 January 2019 BEC_Mt Holland_SRE_final_V2_10i2019.docx This document has been prepared to the requirements of the Client and is for the use by the Client, its agents, and Bennelongia Environmental Consultants. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property associated with the document belongs to Bennelongia Environmental Consultants and may not be reproduced without written permission of the Client or Bennelongia. No liability or responsibility is accepted in respect of any use by a third party or for purposes other than for which the document was commissioned. Bennelongia has not attempted to verify the accuracy and completeness of information supplied by the Client. © Copyright 2015 Bennelongia Pty Ltd. i Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Covalent Lithium proposes to mine lithium at the Earl Grey deposit (the Proposal) approximately 100 km southeast of Southern Cross in Western Australia. This desktop review examines the likelihood that short-range endemic (SRE) invertebrates and listed terrestrial invertebrate species occur in the Proposal area and whether these species are likely to be impacted by proposed development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary Fate of Rpl32 and Rps16 Losses in the Euphorbia Schimperi (Euphorbiaceae) Plastome Aldanah A
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The evolutionary fate of rpl32 and rps16 losses in the Euphorbia schimperi (Euphorbiaceae) plastome Aldanah A. Alqahtani1,2* & Robert K. Jansen1,3 Gene transfers from mitochondria and plastids to the nucleus are an important process in the evolution of the eukaryotic cell. Plastid (pt) gene losses have been documented in multiple angiosperm lineages and are often associated with functional transfers to the nucleus or substitutions by duplicated nuclear genes targeted to both the plastid and mitochondrion. The plastid genome sequence of Euphorbia schimperi was assembled and three major genomic changes were detected, the complete loss of rpl32 and pseudogenization of rps16 and infA. The nuclear transcriptome of E. schimperi was sequenced to investigate the transfer/substitution of the rpl32 and rps16 genes to the nucleus. Transfer of plastid-encoded rpl32 to the nucleus was identifed previously in three families of Malpighiales, Rhizophoraceae, Salicaceae and Passiforaceae. An E. schimperi transcript of pt SOD-1- RPL32 confrmed that the transfer in Euphorbiaceae is similar to other Malpighiales indicating that it occurred early in the divergence of the order. Ribosomal protein S16 (rps16) is encoded in the plastome in most angiosperms but not in Salicaceae and Passiforaceae. Substitution of the E. schimperi pt rps16 was likely due to a duplication of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial-targeted rps16 resulting in copies dually targeted to the mitochondrion and plastid. Sequences of RPS16-1 and RPS16-2 in the three families of Malpighiales (Salicaceae, Passiforaceae and Euphorbiaceae) have high sequence identity suggesting that the substitution event dates to the early divergence within Malpighiales.
    [Show full text]
  • ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan
    Appendix 1 to Murray, K., Skerratt, L., Marantelli, G., Berger, L., Hunter, D., Mahony, M. and Hines, H. 2011. Guidelines for minimising disease risks associated with captive breeding, raising and restocking programs for Australian frogs. A report for the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan Compiled by: Graeme Gillespie, Director Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria; Russel Traher, Amphibian TAG Convenor, Curator Healesville Sanctuary Chris Banks, Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria. February 2007 1 1. Background Amphibian species across the world have declined at an alarming rate in recent decades. According to the IUCN at least 122 species have gone extinct since 1980 and nearly one third of the world’s near 6,000 amphibian species are classified as threatened with extinction, placing the entire class at the core of the current biodiversity crisis (IUCN, 2006). Australasia too has experienced significant declines; several Australian species are considered extinct and nearly 25% of the remainder are threatened with extinction, while all four species native to New Zealand are threatened. Conventional causes of biodiversity loss, habitat destruction and invasive species, are playing a major role in these declines. However, emergent disease and climate change are strongly implicated in many declines and extinctions. These factors are now acting globally, rapidly and, most disturbingly, in protected and near pristine areas. Whilst habitat conservation and mitigation of threats in situ are essential, for many taxa the requirement for some sort of ex situ intervention is mounting. In response to this crisis there have been a series of meetings organised by the IUCN (World Conservation Union), WAZA (World Association of Zoos & Aquariums) and CBSG (Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, of the IUCN Species Survival Commission) around the world to discuss how the zoo community can and should respond.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2011 Issue
    THE FROG AND TADPOLE STUDY GROUP NSW Inc. Email: [email protected] PO Box 296 Rockdale NSW 2216 Frogwatch Helpline 0419 249 728 Website: www.fats.org.au NEWSLETTER No. 113 June 2011 ABN: 34 282 154 794 Photo by Jodi Rowley Bidoup-Nui Ba National Park, Vietnam. Rhacophorus vampyrus Vampire Flying Frog Arrive 6.30 pm for a 7pm start. Friday 3rd June FATS meet at the Education Centre, Bicentennial Park Easy walk from Concord West railway station and straight down Victoria Ave. If walking, take a strong torch in winter. By car: Enter from Australia Ave at the Bicentennial Park main entrance, turn off to the right and drive through the park. It’s a one way road. Or enter from Bennelong Road / Parkway. It’s a short stretch of two way road. Park in p10f car park - the last car park before the exit gate. See map p12. CONTENTS PAGE DECCW amphibian licences must be sighted, to adopt frogs. Notes from April meeting Main speaker Jodi Rowley MEETING FORMAT Friday 3rd June 2011 Vampire Flying Frogs 2 Arthur White Darwin’s Frogs 3 6.30 pm Lost Perons frogs and a few others needing homes. Thank you to Marion Anstis, Lothar Please bring your FATS membership card and $$ donation. and Alice Voigt 3 DECCW amphibian licence must be sighted on the night. Herpdigest 4 The frogs can never be released. YouTube clips 5 7.00 pm Welcome and announcements. What’s at the bottom of your garden? 5-7 FATS AGM notice 5th August 2011 7 7..30 pm The main speaker is Robert Wall “The Barred Frogs Frog-o-graphic competition 2011 8 of the Gloucester Valley” Escape devices for animals in pools 8 -9 Grant Webster “ Driving along looking for Frogs” Photos by George Madani Joel Cassar “Toad catching scoop” Frogs use bladder 10 Punia Jeffery “FATS at the Royal Easter Show” to expel foreign objects FATS contact information 11 9.30 pm Show us your frog images, tell us about your frogging Field trips 12 trips or experiences, guessing competition, light refreshments FATS meeting location map 12 and a chance to relax and chat with frog experts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Fringing Vegetation (Watercourse)
    TheThe ValueValue ofof FringingFringing VegetationVegetation UnaUna BellBell Dedicated to the memory of Dr Luke J. Pen An Inspiration to Us All Acknowledgements This booklet is the result of a request from the Jane Brook Catchment Group for a booklet that focuses on the local native plants along creeks in Perth Hills. Thank you to the Jane Brook Catchment Group, Shire of Kalamunda, Environmental Advisory Committee of the Shire of Mundaring, Eastern Metropolitan Regional Council, Eastern Hills Catchment Management Program and Mundaring Community Bank Branch, Bendigo Bank who have all provided funding for this project. Without their support this project would not have come to fruition. Over the course of working on this booklet many people have helped in various ways. I particularly wish to thank past and present Catchment Officers and staff from the Shire of Kalamunda, the Shire of Mundaring and the EMRC, especially Shenaye Hummerston, Kylie del Fante, Renee d’Herville, Craig Wansbrough, Toni Burbidge and Ryan Hepworth, as well as Graham Zemunik, and members of the Jane Brook Catchment Group. I also wish to thank the WA Herbarium staff, especially Louise Biggs, Mike Hislop, Karina Knight and Christine Hollister. Booklet design - Rita Riedel, Shire of Kalamunda About the Author Una Bell has a BA (Social Science) (Hons.) and a Graduate Diploma in Landcare. She is a Research Associate at the WA Herbarium with an interest in native grasses, Community Chairperson of the Eastern Hills Catchment Management Program, a member of the Jane Brook Catchment Group, and has been a bush care volunteer for over 20 years. Other publications include Common Native Grasses of South-West WA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Remarkable Example of Trans-Oceanic Dispersal in an Austral Mygalomorph Spider
    Edith Cowan University Research Online ECU Publications Post 2013 8-2-2017 Across the Indian Ocean: A remarkable example of trans-oceanic dispersal in an austral mygalomorph spider Sophie E. Harrison Mark S. Harvey Edith Cowan University Steve J.B. Cooper Andrew D. Austin Michael G. Rix Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013 Part of the Other Animal Sciences Commons 10.1371/journal.pone.0180139 Harrison, S. E., Harvey, M. S., Cooper, S. J., Austin, A. D., & Rix, M. G. (2017). Across the Indian Ocean: A remarkable example of trans-oceanic dispersal in an austral mygalomorph spider. PloS one, 12(8), e0180139. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180139 This Journal Article is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/3079 RESEARCH ARTICLE Across the Indian Ocean: A remarkable example of trans-oceanic dispersal in an austral mygalomorph spider Sophie E. Harrison1*, Mark S. Harvey2,3,4, Steve J. B. Cooper1,5, Andrew D. Austin1, Michael G. Rix1,2,6 1 Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia, 2 Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Welshpool DC, WA, Australia, 3 School of Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, a1111111111 Australia, 4 School of Natural Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia, 5 Evolutionary a1111111111 Biology Unit, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia, 6 Biodiversity and a1111111111 Geosciences Program, Queensland Museum, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS The Migidae are a family of austral trapdoor spiders known to show a highly restricted and Citation: Harrison SE, Harvey MS, Cooper SJB, disjunct distribution pattern.
    [Show full text]