The Identification of Seven Chemical Warfare Mimics Using A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Identification of Seven Chemical Warfare Mimics Using A sensors Article The Identification of Seven Chemical Warfare Mimics Using a Colorimetric Array Michael J. Kangas * , Adreanna Ernest, Rachel Lukowicz, Andres V. Mora , Anais Quossi, Marco Perez, Nathan Kyes and Andrea E. Holmes * Department of Chemistry, Doane University, Crete, NE 68333, USA; [email protected] (A.E.); [email protected] (R.L.); [email protected] (A.V.M.); [email protected] (A.Q.); [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (N.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.J.K.); [email protected] (A.E.H.) Received: 8 November 2018; Accepted: 3 December 2018; Published: 6 December 2018 Abstract: Chemical warfare agents pose significant threats in the 21st century, especially for armed forces. A colorimetric detection array was developed to identify warfare mimics, including mustard gas and nerve agents. In total, 188 sensors were screened to determine the best sensor performance, in order to identify warfare mimics 2-chloro ethyl ethylsulfide, 2-20-thiodiethanol, trifluoroacetic acid, methylphosphonic acid, dimethylphosphite, diethylcyanophosphonate, and diethyl (methylthiomethyl)phosphonate. The highest loadings in the principle component analysis (PCA) plots were used to identify the sensors that were most effective in analyzing the RGB data to classify the warfare mimics. The dataset was reduced to only twelve sensors, and PCA results gave comparable results as the large data did, demonstrating that only twelve sensors are needed to classify the warfare mimics. Keywords: warfare mimics; mustard gas; colorimetric array; principle component analysis; RGB data 1. Introduction Improving the non-presumptive detection of chemical warfare agents for soldiers in the field is a pressing need [1]. Warfare agents include chemical and explosive compounds, such as nerve agents like sarin, soman, and tabun, which are clear, colorless liquids without strong odors, and can cause loss of consciousness, seizures, and eventual death [2]. Other chemicals of war include vesicants or poisons, such as mustard gas, lewisite, phosgene, phosgene oxime, cyanide, mace, ricin, and pepper spray made of capsaicin [2]. Additionally, the detection of the precursors and degradation products of these materials can be equally important [3]. Existing technology has shown that these devices can effectively detect such analytes, but requires high-tech, expensive, and large instrumentation, which makes them less than ideal for field applications [4–7]. Colorimetric and fluorescent sensors have the potential to be effective detection systems for these analytes, but require minimal instrumentation. New sensors for these analytes have recently been reviewed [8]. One drawback of sensors is that they can be limited in the versatility or specificity of the analytes that can be identified. This can be overcome by combining multiple sensors into a sensor array, and the pattern of color changes can be used to identify and quantify a wide range of analytes [9–12]. A few sensor arrays chromofluorogenic supramolecular complexes for the chromogenic or fluorogenic sensing of nerve agents have been reported [13], as well as color changes of organophosphorus warfare mimics in the gas phase [14,15]. Exposure guidelines by the Center Disease Control suggest that mustard gas concentrations of 3.9 mg/m3 cause life-threatening effects or death. Therefore, there is a pressing need to identify sensors that can quickly detect this life-threatening agent. Herein, we examined the screening Sensors 2018, 18, 4291; doi:10.3390/s18124291 www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors Sensors 2018, 18, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 9 Sensors 2018, 18, 4291 2 of 8 sensors that can quickly detect this life-threatening agent. Herein, we examined the screening of 188 colorimetric sensors, in solution, to simulate an array for the detection of 144 samples of mustard gas mimics,of 188 colorimetric 2-chloro-ethyl-ethylsulfide sensors, in solution, (0.1 M), to simulate2-2′-thiodiethanol an array (1 for M), the and detection nerve ofagent 144 samplesmimics, 0 trifluoroaceticof mustard gas acid mimics, (1 2-chloro-ethyl-ethylsulfideM), methylphosphonic (0.1acid M),(1 2-2M),-thiodiethanol dimethylphosphite (1 M), and (1 nerveM), diethylcyanophosphonateagent mimics, trifluoroacetic (1 M), acid and (1 diethyl M), methylphosphonic (methylthiomethyl)phosphonate acid (1 M), dimethylphosphite (0.1 M) (Figure 1) (1 [14– M), 16].diethylcyanophosphonate The identity and CAS (1 numbers M), and diethylof all 188 (methylthiomethyl)phosphonate sensors are located in the Supplemental (0.1 M) (Figure Information1)[ 14–16]. The(Table identity S1). and CAS numbers of all 188 sensors are located in the Supplemental Information (Table S1). S Cl HO OH S 2-2'-thiodiethanol 2-chloro-ethyl-ethylsulfide N H O P HO O O PO O O O F F F diethylcyanophosphonate dimethylphosphite trifluoroacetic acid O S O P O OH O P OH diethyl-(methylthiomethyl)-phosphonate methylphosphonic acid Figure 1. ChemicalChemical structures structures of mustard gas mimics (red) and nerve gas mimics (blue). 2. Materials and Methods All reagentsreagents werewere purchased purchased from from various various chemical chemical supply supply companies companies at technical at technical grade grade or better, or better,and were and used were as received.used as Thereceived. universal The indicator universal was indicator composed was of Vancomposed Urk’s and of Yamada’sVan Urk’s recipe, and Yamada’sand contained recipe, methyl and red,contained methyl methyl orange, red, phenolphthalein, methyl orange, andphenolphthalein, bromothymol and blue bromothymol powders in a weightblue powders ratio of approximatelyin a weight ratio 1:3:7:8 of [17 approximately]. One percent weight-by-weight1:3:7:8 [17]. One solutionspercent ofweight-by-weight all sensors were preparedsolutions byof dissolvingall sensors each were into prepared aliquots of by a solvent dissolving mixture each consisting into aliquots of acetate of buffera solvent (0.1 M,mixture pH 5), consistingethylene glycol, of acetate triethylene buffer glycol(0.1 M, monobutyl pH 5), ethyle ether,ne andglycol, glycerol, triethylene in a ratio glycol of 14:1.6:1:3.2. monobutyl The ether, sensors and ◦ wereglycerol, dissolved in a ratio by of sonication 14:1.6:1:3.2. in The a bath sensors sonicator were (30dissolvedC) for by 1 h,sonication followed in by a bath 5 min sonicator mixing (30 with °C) a probefor 1 h, sonicator, followed and by then5 min vacuum mixing filteredwith a onceprobe through sonicator, Whatman and then #1 vacuum filter paper, filtered and once through Whatman nylon#1 filter filter paper, membranes and once (0.2 throughµm). Whatman nylon filter membranes (0.2 µm). A solution of of methyl methyl phosphonic phosphonic acid acid (1 (1 M) M) wa wass prepared prepared dissolving dissolving an an appropriate appropriate amount amount of theof theanalytes analytes in milli-Q in milli-Q water water (18 (18MΩ M-cm).W-cm). Solutions Solutions of 2 ofchloroethyl 2 chloroethyl ethyl ethyl sulfide sulfide (0.1 (0.1M), 2,2 M),′ 0 thiodiethanol2,2 thiodiethanol (1 M), (1 M),diethylcyanophosphonate diethylcyanophosphonate (0.1 (0.1 M), M), dimethylphosphite dimethylphosphite (1 (1 M), M), and and diethyl (methylthiomethyl)phosphonate (0.1 (0.1 M) M) were were prepar prepareded by diluting the reagents with milli-Q water (18 M MΩW-cm).-cm). The The concentrations concentrations were were selected selected to be to near be near the solubility the solubility limit limitor 1 M. or Solutions 1 M. Solutions of 2,2′ 0 thiodiethanolof 2,2 thiodiethanol and methylphosphonic and methylphosphonic acid were acid stored were in storedthe dark in at the room dark temperature at room temperature and were replacedand were replacedapproximately approximately every three every threemonths. months. Solutions Solutions of of2-chloroethyl 2-chloroethyl ethyl ethyl sulfide, sulfide, diethylcyanophosphonate, dimeth dimethylphosphite,ylphosphite, and and diethyl (methylthiomethyl)phosphonate(methylthiomethyl)phosphonate were ◦ portioned into ~10 mL aliquots, stored at −−6060 °CC to to minimize decomposition [18], [18], and replaced approximately everyevery 33 months.months. Solutions Solutions were were allowed allowed to to thaw thaw at roomat room temperature temperature for for 1 h before1 h before use. use. Sensor (100 µL) was added to all the wells of a flat bottomed 96-well plate using a 12-channel electronicSensor pipet. (100 µL) One was hundred added microlitersto all the wells of each of a analyte flat bottomed were applied 96-well to plate rows using of the a 12-channel well plate. Thirty-twoelectronic pipet. samples One of waterhundred and microliters 16 samples of of each the 7 analytesanalyte were were applied tested to to make rows the of total the samplewell plate. size 144.Thirty-two The plate samples was scanned of water as and detailed 16 samples below. of the 7 analytes were tested to make the total sample size 144.All arrayThe plate images was (24-bit scanned color, as detailed 400 dpi) below. were collected using an Epson Perfection V700 desktop scannerAll inarray transparency images (24-bit mode. color, To eliminate 400 dpi) interferenceswere collected from using stray an light,Epson the Perfection scanner wasV700 draped desktop in scannerblack cloth. in transparency The images mode. were analyzed To eliminate with interfer ImageJences [19], andfrom the stray extraction light, the of scanner mean RGB was valuesdraped for in blackeach wellcloth. was The automated images were with analyzed a macro with [20]. ImageJ No attempts [19], and were the made extraction to correct of mean for image-to-imageRGB values for each well was automated with a macro [20]. No attempts were made to correct for image-to-image SensorsSensors 20182018, ,1818, ,x 4291FOR PEER REVIEW 3 3of of 9 8 variation by subtracting a control row, as one sensor was tested on each well plate, and our previous workvariation found by correcting subtracting images a control to be row, unnecessary as one sensor [12]. was tested on each well plate, and our previous workAll found statistical correcting analysis images was toperformed be unnecessary using the [12].
Recommended publications
  • Decontamination of Agent Yellow, a Lewisite and Sulfur Mustard Mixture
    EPA 600/R-14/436 | March 2015 | www.epa.gov/research Decontamination of Agent Yellow, a Lewisite and Sulfur Mustard Mixture Office of Research and Development National Homeland Security Research Center Decontamination of Agent Yellow, a Lewisite and Sulfur Mustard Mixture Evaluation Report National Homeland Security Research Center Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 ii Disclaimer The United States Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development’s National Homeland Security Research Center funded and managed the research described here under EPA Contract Number EP-C-10-001, Work Assignment Number 4-28 with Battelle. This report has been peer and administratively reviewed and has been approved for publication as an Environmental Protection Agency report. It does not necessarily reflect views of the Environmental Protection Agency. No official endorsement should be inferred. The Environmental Protection Agency does not endorse the purchase or sale of any commercial products or services. Questions concerning this document or its application should be addressed to: Lukas Oudejans, Ph.D. Decontamination and Consequence Management Division National Homeland Security Research Center Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (MD-E343-06) 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-2973 Fax: 919-541-0496 E-mail: [email protected] iii Acknowledgments The following individuals are acknowledged
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare Agents for Modeling Airborne Dispersion in and Around Buildings
    LBNL-45475 ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIn NAL LABORATORY Databaseof Physical,Chemicaland ToxicologicalPropertiesof Chemical and Biological(CB)WarfitreAgentsfor ModelingAirborneDispersionIn and AroundBuildings TracyThatcher,RichSextro,andDonErmak Environmental Energy Technologies Division DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of Catifomia, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of anY information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommend at i on, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is an equal opportunity employer. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Warfare Agent (CWA) Identification Overview
    Physicians for Human Rights Chemical Warfare Agent (CWA) Identification Overview Chemical Warfare Agent Identification Fact Sheet Series Table of Contents This Chemical Warfare Agent (CWA) Identification Fact Sheet is part 2 Physical Properties of a Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) series designed to fill a gap in 2 VX (Nerve Agent) 2 Sarin (Nerve Agent) knowledge among medical first responders to possible CWA attacks. 2 Tabun (Nerve Agent) This document in particular outlines differences between a select 2 BZ (Incapacitating Agent) group of vesicants and nerve agents, the deployment of which would 2 Mustard Gas (Vesicant) necessitate emergency medical treatment and documentation. 3 Collecting Samples to Test for Exposure 4 Protection PHR hopes that, by referencing these fact sheets, medical professionals 5 Symptoms may be able to correctly diagnose, treat, and document evidence of 6 Differential Diagnosis exposure to CWAs. Information in this fact sheet has been compiled from 8 Decontimanation 9 Treatment publicly available sources. 9 Abbreviations A series of detailed CWA fact sheets outlining in detail those properties and treatment regimes unique to each CWA is available at physiciansforhumanrights.org/training/chemical-weapons. phr.org Chemical Warfare Agent (CWA) Identification Overview 1 Collect urine samples, and blood and hair samples if possible, immediately after exposure Physical Properties VX • A lethal dose (10 mg) of VX, absorbed through the skin, can kill within minutes (Nerve Agent) • Can remain in environment for weeks
    [Show full text]
  • Lewisite Fact Sheet
    Lewisite Fact Sheet HIGHLIGHTS: It is unlikely that the general population will be exposed to blister agents Lewisite or Mustard-Lewisite. People who breathe in vapors of Lewisite or Mustard-Lewisite may experience damage to the respiratory system. Contact with the skin or eye can result in serious burns. Lewisite or Mustard-Lewisite also can cause damage to bone marrow and blood vessels. Exposure to high levels may be fatal. Blister agents Lewisite and Mustard-Lewisite have not been found in any of the 1,585 National Priorities List sites identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). What are lewisite and mustard-lewisite? Lewisite is an oily, colorless liquid with an odor like geraniums. Mustard-Lewisite Mixture is a liquid with a garlic-like odor. Mustard-Lewisite is a mixture of Lewisite and a sulfur mustard known as HD. Lewisite might have been used as a chemical weapon by Japan against Chinese forces in the 1930s, but such reports have not been confirmed. Any stored Lewisite in the United States must be destroyed before April 2007, as mandated by the Chemical Weapons Convention. What happens to lewisite and mustard-lewisite when it enters the environment? • Blister agents Lewisite and Mustard-Lewisite could enter the environment from an accidental release. • In air, blister agents Lewisite and Mustard-Lewisite will be broken down by compounds that are found in the air, but they may persist in air for a few days before being broken down. • Lewisite and Mustard-Lewisite will be broken down in water quickly, but small amounts may evaporate. • Lewisite and Mustard-Lewisite will be broken down in moist soil quickly, but small amounts may evaporate.
    [Show full text]
  • Warning: the Following Lecture Contains Graphic Images
    What the новичок (Novichok)? Why Chemical Warfare Agents Are More Relevant Than Ever Matt Sztajnkrycer, MD PHD Professor of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Medical Toxicologist, Minnesota Poison Control System Medical Director, RFD Chemical Assessment Team @NoobieMatt #ITLS2018 Disclosures In accordance with the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) Standards, the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission (ANCC) and the Commission on Accreditation for Pre-Hospital Continuing Education (CAPCE), states presenters must disclose the existence of significant financial interests in or relationships with manufacturers or commercial products that may have a direct interest in the subject matter of the presentation, and relationships with the commercial supporter of this CME activity. The presenter does not consider that it will influence their presentation. Dr. Sztajnkrycer does not have a significant financial relationship to report. Dr. Sztajnkrycer is on the Editorial Board of International Trauma Life Support. Specific CW Agents Classes of Chemical Agents: The Big 5 The “A” List Pulmonary Agents Phosgene Oxime, Chlorine Vesicants Mustard, Phosgene Blood Agents CN Nerve Agents G, V, Novel, T Incapacitating Agents Thinking Outside the Box - An Abbreviated List Ammonia Fluorine Chlorine Acrylonitrile Hydrogen Sulfide Phosphine Methyl Isocyanate Dibotane Hydrogen Selenide Allyl Alcohol Sulfur Dioxide TDI Acrolein Nitric Acid Arsine Hydrazine Compound 1080/1081 Nitrogen Dioxide Tetramine (TETS) Ethylene Oxide Chlorine Leaks Phosphine Chlorine Common Toxic Industrial Chemical (“TIC”). Why use it in war/terror? Chlorine Density of 3.21 g/L. Heavier than air (1.28 g/L) sinks. Concentrates in low-lying areas. Like basements and underground bunkers. Reacts with water: Hypochlorous acid (HClO) Hydrochloric acid (HCl).
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2. Hazards Identification OSHA/HCS Status : This Material Is Considered Hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Arsine / Helium / Phosgene Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Nonflammable Gas Mixture: Arsine / Helium / Phosgene Other means of : Not available. identification Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 006605 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : GASES UNDER PRESSURE - Compressed gas substance or mixture ACUTE TOXICITY (inhalation) - Category 4 GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Warning Hazard statements : Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. May displace oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. Harmful if inhaled. Precautionary statements General : Read and follow all Safety Data Sheets (SDS’S) before use. Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Close valve after each use and when empty. Use equipment rated for cylinder pressure. Do not open valve until connected to equipment prepared for use. Use a back flow preventative device in the piping. Use only equipment of compatible materials of construction. Prevention : Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area. Avoid breathing gas. Response : IF INHALED: Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing. Call a POISON CENTER or physician if you feel unwell. Storage : Protect from sunlight when ambient temperature exceeds 52°C/125°F. Store in a well- ventilated place.
    [Show full text]
  • First Aid in the Prevention and Treatment of Chemical Casualties
    OCD 2202-1 January 1943 FIRST AID in the Prevention and Treatment of CHEMICAL CASUALTIES Revised MEDICAL DIVISION OFFICE OF CIVILIAN DEFENSE Washington, D. C. PREFACE This booklet is intended for the personnel of Emergency Medical Field Units and others who may be immediately concerned in the cleansing of persons and the administration of first aid to chemical casualties. Identification, character- istics, and tactical uses of the various agents are discussed only briefly; the reader is referred to the Civilian Defense textbook, “Protection Against Gas,” for a more extensive discussion of these matters. For information on medical care and treatment consult Technical Manual 8-285, “Treat- ment of Casualties from Chemical Agents,” prepared by the War Department and published by the Government Printing Office. CONTENTS Chapter Page I. General Considerations 3 A. Kinds - 3 B. Recognition 3 1. Identification by Odor 4 2. Table of Odors and Effects 4 C. General Protective Measures 5 If. Lung irritants (Phosgene, Chlorpicrin, Chlorine, Nitric Fumes) 6 A. Latent Period 6 B. Effects 6 C. Symptoms 7 D. First Aid 7 Iff. Blister Bases (Mustard, Lewisite, Ethyldichlorar- sine) „ 8 A. Special Characteristics 8 Table of Differences between Lewisite and Mustard-_ 10 B. Mustard H 1. Effects-- 11 2. Prevention—First Aid . 12 C. Lewisite 14 1. Early Effects 15 2. Late Effects 15 3. Prevention—First Aid 15 D. Ethyldichlorarsine 16 1. Immediate Effects 16 2. First Aid 16 1 496407°—43 1 IV. Tear liases (Lacrimators) (Chloracetophenone, Chloracetophenone Solution, C N B Solution, Brom- benzyl cyanide) 17 A. Effects .1 ’ 17 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Chemical Weapons
    Modern Chemical Weapons Modern Chemical Weapons causes serious diseases like cancer and serious birth defects in newly born Large scale chemical weapons were children. first used in World War One and have been used ever since. About 100 years ago Modern warfare has developed significantly since the early 20th century Early chemical weapons being used but the use of toxic chemicals to kill around a hundred years ago included: and badly injure is still very much in use tear gas, chlorine gas, mustard gas today. There have been reports of and phosgene gas. Since then, some chemical weapon attacks in Syria of the same chemicals have been during 2016. Chemical weapons have used in more modern warfare, but also been the choice of terrorists other new chemical weapons have because they are not very expensive also been developed. and need very little specialist knowledge to use them. These Chlorine gas (Cl2) weapons can cause a lot of causalities as well as fatalities, but also There have been reports of many spread panic and fear. chlorine gas attacks in Syria since 2013. It is a yellow-green gas which has a very distinctive smell like bleach. However, it does not last very long and therefore it is sometimes very difficult to prove it has been used during an attack. Victims would feel irritation of the eyes, nose, throat and lungs when they inhale it in large enough quantities. In even larger quantities it can cause the death of a person by suffocation. Mustard gas (C4H8Cl2S) There are reports by the United Nations (UN) of terrorist groups using Mustard Agent Orange (mixture of gas during chemical attacks in Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical, Radiological and Nuclear Medical Countermeasures
    Chemical, Radiological and Nuclear Medical Countermeasures Ron Manning,g, Ph.D. Chief, Chemical, Radiological and Nuclear Division of CBRN Countermeasures June 7, 2011 Roadmap • Rad Nuc Background and the threat • Rad Nuc Scenario considerations and Reqquirements development • Areas of Rad Nuc Programmatic Interest • Rad Nuc Portfolio Strategy • Special Considerations for Development Efforts • Solicitations in Fed Biz Ops • The Chemical Threat • Vesicants • Chem Special Instructions • Continuing Challenges • Interagency Partnering • BARDA funding 11 Rad Nuc Background •The detonation of an Improvised Nuclear Device (IND) has the potential to produce a large number of victims with multiple and mixed injuries •Exposure to radiation induces dose-dependent injury to cells and tissue through a cascade of molecular and biochemical changes that lead to cell death or disruption 98-- 7- 6 5- 4- Dangerous Fallout 3- ground-zero 2- --1- 0- Light Damage Miles from 1 kT Moderate Damage 0.1 kT 10 kT MdiMedium Severe Damage Small Large •Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS) is the medical consequence of approximately 2 Gy exposure •The symptoms and progressionprogression of radiation injuryinjury occur even after the radiation exposure has ceased and there is a continuity of medical consequences from the ARS to the Delayed Effects of the Acute Exposure (DEARE) to chronic radiation damage 2 IND Scenarios and Requirements Development • Hundreds of IND scenarios ─ Developed with modeling and working groups with subject matter experts ─ Several cities modeled ─ Several radiation yields ─ 12 months (Jan - Dec): (e.g. Monthly winds and weather affect the fallout pattern)pattern) • Requirements established from modeling scenarios • Fulfillment of requirements ─ Acquisition of products via Project BioShield contracts ─ Development of products via Advanced Research and Development contracts ─ Review portfolio as requirements change • Requirements are reviewed on a regular basis and do change over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Sab-23-Wp01 E .Pdf
    OPCW Scientific Advisory Board Twenty - Third Session SAB-23/WP.1 18 – 22 April 2016 28 April 2016 ENGLISH only RESPONSE TO THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL'S REQUEST TO THE SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD TO PROVIDE FURTHER ADVICE ON SCHEDULED CHEMICALS CS-2016-9751(E) distributed 29/04/2016 *CS-2016-9751.E* SAB-23/WP.1 Annex page 2 Annex RESPONSE TO THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL’S REQUEST TO THE SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD TO PROVIDE FURTHER ADVICE ON SCHEDULED CHEMICALS 1. RECCOMENDATIONS 1.1 The Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) has considered isotopically labelled scheduled chemicals and stereoisomers of scheduled compounds relating to the Convention according to the Director-General’s requests (see Appendixes 1 and 2). 1.2 Recommendation 1. The SAB recommends that the molecular parent structure of a chemical should determine whether it is covered by a schedule entry. This is because: (a) it is inappropriate to rely solely upon Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) numbers to define chemicals covered by the schedules. Although relevant as aids to declaration and verification, CAS numbers should not be used as the means to identify a chemical, or to determine whether a chemical is included in, or excluded from, a schedule; (b) thus, if a chemical is included within a schedule, then all possible isotopically-labelled forms and stereoisomers of that chemical should be included, irrespective of whether or not they have been assigned a CAS number or have CAS numbers different to those shown in the Annex on Chemicals to the Convention. The isotopically labelled compound or stereoisomer related to the parent chemical specified in the schedule should be interpreted as belonging to the same schedule; and (c) this advice is consistent with previous SAB views on this topic.1 1.3 Recommendation 2.
    [Show full text]
  • OSHA Method 61: Phosgene
    PHOSGENE - (Organic Method #61) Page 1 of 20 U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety & Health Administration www.osha.gov Search Advanced Search | A Technical Links > Sampling & Analytical Methods > Index PHOSGENE Method no.: 61 Matrix: Air Target concentration: 100 ppb (0.4 mg/m3) (OSHA PEL) Procedure: Air samples are collected by drawing known volumes of air through sampling tubes containing XAD-2 adsorbent which has been coated with 2­ (hydroxymethyl)piperidine. The samples are desorbed with toluene and then analyzed by gas chromatography using a nitrogen selective detector. Recommended air volume and sampling rate: 240 L at 1 L/min Reliable quantitation limit: 3.5 ppb (0.014 mg/m3) Standard error of estimate at the target concentration: 6.7% (Section 4.7.) Status of method: Evaluated method. This method has been subjected to the established evaluation procedures of the Organic Methods Evaluation Branch. Date: August 1986 Chemist: Warren Hendricks Organic Methods Evaluation Branch OSHA Analytical Laboratory Salt Lake City, Utah 1. General Discussion 1.1. Background 1.1.1. History http://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/organic/org061/org061.html 7/7/2008 PHOSGENE - (Organic Method #61) Page 2 of 20 The procedures that have been used by OSHA to monitor occupational exposure to phosgene include detector tubes, monitoring dosimeters and infrared gas analyzers. None of these procedures have proven to be completely adequate for use by OSHA. These methods lack either the desired precision and accuracy or they are awkward and inconvenient for field use. This procedure was developed after it was found that phosgene would react quantitatively with 2-(hydroxymethyl)piperidine (2-HMP) to form a stable derivative, 1-aza-8-oxabicyclo[4.3.0.]inonan-9-one.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Chemical and Physical Information
    SULFUR MUSTARD 119 4. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL INFORMATION 4.1 CHEMICAL IDENTITY Information regarding the chemical identity of sulfur mustard is located in Table 4-1. Sulfur mustard has several synonyms; the most common are “mustard gas”, “H”, and “HD”. The term “mustard gas” may be used interchangeably to identify “sulfur mustard.” “H” refers to undistilled or raw sulfur mustard, which contains a large fraction of impurities (see Table 4-2). “HD” refers to a distilled or purified form of sulfur mustard (see Table 4-3). “HT” is often called sulfur mustard even though it is a mixture of 60% “HD”, <40% Agent T (bis[2-(2-chloroethylthio)ethyl]ether, CAS# 63918-89-8), and a variety of sulfur contaminants and impurities. Most studies on sulfur mustard are based on its distilled or purified form, “HD” (Munro et al. 1999). Other mustard agents, such as “HN” or nitrogen mustard (i.e., bis(2-chloro­ ethyl)methylamine hydrochloride; CAS No. 55-86-7) and lewisite (i.e., 2-chlorovinyldichloroarsine; CAS No. 541-25-3) are related to sulfur mustard. Information about “HN”, “HT”, and lewisite are not included in this document. 4.2 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES Information regarding the physical and chemical properties of sulfur mustard (HD) is located in Table 4-4. Weapons-grade sulfur mustard can contain stabilizers, starting materials, or by-products formed during manufacturing, and products formed from slow reactions during storage (Munro et al. 1999). The typical compositions of HD and H are illustrated in Tables 4-3 and 4-4, respectively (NRC 1999; Rosenblatt et al.
    [Show full text]