2011 REPORT CARD LONE STAR COLLEGE SYSTEM
How does the Lone Star College System compare with other community colleges of like size and organizational structure? Below are colleges used in the comparison of nine critical areas listed on the back of this page.
Cuyahoga
N. Virginia
S. Nevada
Riverside
Mesa Tarrant Dallas
Austin Valencia Lone Star Alamo Broward Houston Miami Dade
COLLEGE ABBREVIATION COLLEGE ABBREVIATION
Alamo Colleges Alamo Lone Star College System Lone Star Austin Community College Austin Mesa Community College Mesa Broward College Broward Miami Dade College Miami Dade College of Southern Nevada S. Nevada Northern Virginia Community College N. Virginia Cuyahoga Community College District Cuyahoga Riverside Community College Riverside Dallas County Community College District Dallas Tarrant County College District Tarrant Houston Community College District Houston Valencia Community College Valencia 2011 REPORT CARD LSCS PEER PERFORMANCE TRACKING
STUDENT HEADCOUNT TUITION AND FEES ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS FALL 20101 PER CREDIT HOUR PERCENTAGE OF BUDGET FALL 20101 FY 2009 – 20101
Dallas 81,359 N. Virginia $123 Houston 16% Lone Star 69,339 Miami Dade $95 Mesa 14% Miami Dade 68,831 Broward $95 Alamo 14% Houston 60,303 Valencia $92 Miami Dade 13% Alamo 59,513 Cuyahoga $85 Austin 13% Tarrant 49,108 Mesa $71 Broward 13% N. Virginia 49,016 S. Nevada $70 Dallas 13% Austin 44,100 Alamo $64 Valencia 12% S. Nevada 43,686 Austin $58 Cuyahoga 12% Broward 42,873 Houston $57 N. Virginia 12% Valencia 41,482 Lone Star $55 Riverside 12% Riverside 39,0002 Tarrant $50 Tarrant 11% Cuyahoga 31,683 Dallas $45 Lone Star 11% Mesa 26,408 Riverside $26 S. Nevada 10% Number of students served for credit classes. The cost per credit hour is based on FT credit load of 12 hours, Percentage of the budget expenditures dedicated to including all applicable fees. administrative cost.
MINORITY STUDENTS STUDENT FACULTY RATIO TRANSFER RATE FALL 20092 FALL 20092 FALL 20092
Miami Dade 87% Valencia 36:1 Austin 40% Houston 66% Miami Dade 35:1 Dallas 37% Dallas 65% Riverside 33:1 Lone Star 23% Broward 65% Broward 32:1 Houston 23% Alamo 62% S. Nevada 29:1 S. Nevada 23% Riverside 60% N. Virginia 28:1 Alamo 19% Valencia 48% Dallas 26:1 Tarrant 19% S. Nevada 47% Tarrant 25:1 Broward 18% Lone Star 44% Austin 24:1 Riverside 16% N. Virginia 44% Mesa 22:1 Mesa 15% Tarrant 43% Cuyahoga 21:1 N. Virginia 14% Austin 40% Lone Star 21:1 Valencia 13% Cuyahoga 35% Houston 18:1 Cuyahoga 12% Mesa 27% Alamo 18:1 Miami Dade 9%
Students served whose ethnicity fell under the US Census Bureau’s Student Faculty Ratio is student FTE divided by the faculty FTE. Students from Fall term that transferred to a four year institution the Classification of Minority Classification of Federal Data on Race FTE is the number of full-time added to one-third the number of following Spring. and Ethnicity (Black,Hispanic, Asian, American Indian/Alaskan part-time. Native). FULL-TIME FACULTY FULL-TIME PERSISTENCE PART-TIME PERSISTENCE FALL 20092 FALL 20092 FALL 20092
Alamo 1,811 Broward 75% Valencia 56% Miami Dade 1,749 Valencia 72% Broward 56% Houston 1,630 N. Virginia 70% Lone Star 53% Lone Star 1,406 Lone Star 69% Miami Dade 52% Dallas 1,383 Miami Dade 67% Houston 50% Tarrant 1,077 Houston 63% N. Virginia 48% N. Virginia 1,049 Mesa 63% Dallas 47% Austin 977 Dallas 60% Austin 46% S. Nevada 817 Alamo 60% Alamo 45% Cuyahoga 778 Tarrant 58% Cuyahoga 40% Broward 776 Austin 57% Tarrant 39% Riverside 739 Cuyahoga 53% Mesa 37% Valencia 732 Riverside 49% Riverside 29% Mesa 615 S. Nevada NA S. Nevada NA
Instructors employed as full-time faculty. Students enrolled Fall term who re-enrolled the following Fall term. Students enrolled Fall term who re-enrolled the following Fall term.
Data Source: 1 Individual College Websites 2 IPEDS (Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System) Peer Analysis System/most recent data available