DOCSLIB.ORG

Imagining Intersectional Futures: Feminist Approaches in CSCW

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Imagining Intersectional Futures: Feminist Approaches in CSCW Workshop CSCW 2017, February 25–March 1, 2017, Portland, OR, USA Imagining Intersectional Futures: Feminist approaches in CSCW Sarah Fox Anna Lauren Hoffman Abstract University of Washington University of California, Berkeley The aim of this one-day workshop is to explore Seattle, WA, USA Berkeley, CA, USA theoretical and methodological approaches that help us [email protected] [email protected] consider issues of gender, sexual orientation, and power in the design of socio-technical systems. This Amanda Menking Shaowen Bardzell program builds on two previous workshops on the topic University of Washington Indiana University of feminism and CSCW. With this instantiation, we are Seattle, WA, USA Bloomington, IN motivated by an explicit commitment to [email protected] [email protected] intersectionality—a recognition that the effects of various oppressions cannot be understood Stephanie Steinhardt independently. Considerable time will be devoted to Cornell University discussing work in post-colonial feminism, queer Ithaca, NY, USA theory, Women of Color feminism, and feminist critical [email protected] disability studies. Through generative conversation with participants, feedback on works-in-progress, and the initiation of outlets for new feminist CSCW work, we aim to 1) build on existing research and practice and 2) identify concerns and approaches for both designing Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are and assessing research oriented toward intersectional not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that and feminist futures in the context of CSCW and social copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights computing. for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author. Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). Author Keywords CSCW '17 Companion, February 25 - March 01, 2017, Portland, OR, USA Feminism; intersectionality; design; collaboration ACM 978-1-4503-4688-7/17/02. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022665 ACM Classification Keywords K.4.0 Computers in Society: general. 387 Workshop CSCW 2017, February 25–March 1, 2017, Portland, OR, USA Introduction Background Building on two prior workshops on the topic of Over the past decade, CSCW has come to embrace feminism and CSCW [17,25], we propose a follow-up several forms of feminist thought. This shift is marked workshop that will welcome participants interested in by calls for theoretical and methodological intersectional feminist perspectives on cultures of consideration [3,5,23], recognition of similarities in collaboration and design futures. In this workshop, ways of thinking between feminist epistemologies and CSCW scholars and practitioners will engage theoretical contemporary concerns of design research scholarship and methodological approaches in and around CSCW [16], and, more recently, design cases in which authors and social computing that consider problems and have chosen to take up a feminist lens in enacting their problematics of gender, sexual orientation, power and work (e.g., [1,7,12,13,15]). Here, issues of power, other emergent topics motivated by a commitment to inequity, and gender are of crucial concern, rather than intersectionality. Originating in activist traditions and matters to be dismissed as markers of researcher bias taken up in fields like gender studies, legal theory, and [2,20]. sociology, intersectionality recognizes that the effects of various oppressions (like racism, sexism, ableism, Building on this scholarship, our proposed workshop homophobia, imperialism, and beyond) cannot be welcomes participants to take up intersectional understood independently of one another. Thus, perspectives and question approaches to addressing considerable time will be devoted to discussing related oppression that center on a single, monolithic category work in post-colonial feminism, queer theory, Women (i.e., women). The concern with intersectionality is of Color (WoC) feminism or womanism, and feminist inspired by critiques of the white-led women’s critical disability studies. movement of the 1970s [10], black feminist scholars like Hill Collins [8,9], Lorde [21], and hooks [18], and We view this workshop as an opportunity to extend the more recent work by Queer and Trans People of Color, conversation about how to productively develop as well as critical disability scholars [19]. These bodies feminist research and practice and establish a of work share a commitment to questioning prominent commitment to intersectional analyses in the context of feminist platforms that—implicitly or explicitly— CSCW and social computing. Through generative foreground the concerns of heterosexual, cisgender, conversation with invited and accepted participants, and able-bodied middle-class white women. feedback on works-in-progress and the initiation of two outlets for new feminist CSCW work (e.g., an Informed by earlier work in this vein, legal scholar independently published zine, and a proposal for a Kimberlé Crenshaw [11] coined the term special issue of JCSCW highlighting the scholarship of ‘intersectionality’ in 1989, arguing that single-axis workshop participants around feminism and futurism), frameworks for understanding oppression minimize the we will build on existing research and practice by experiences of anyone who is not the assumed identifying concerns and approaches for both designing “standard.” In her multidimensional analysis of two and assessing research oriented toward feminisms. workplace grievance cases, she illustrated how 388 Workshop CSCW 2017, February 25–March 1, 2017, Portland, OR, USA antidiscrimination laws were categorized in such a way feminism toward more pluralistic and generative to only recognize discrimination based on a single engagements with power, dominance, and privilege. variable—gender or race, but not both at the same We also seek to organize around notions of praxis, time. Instead, an intersectional approach sees action directed to alter oppressive structures. structures of dominance like sexism, racism, ableism, classism, homophobia, transphobia, and xenophobia as The outputs of the workshop will extend the 2015 interacting and compounding to create unique workshop website content including the annotated conditions of oppression and discrimination. bibliographic resource of the previous CSCW workshop and acting as a landing page for interested parties in In more recent years, the concept of intersectionality feminist CSCW. We will identify friendly spaces in which has moved across a variety of fields with research to engage in feminist CSCW discourse, like journals, focused on social justice initiatives and interventionist conferences, and popular newspapers and magazines. approaches. HCI scholars Smyth and Dimond [24], for Finally, we will develop an independently published zine instance, propose an Anti-Oppressive Design intended for public consumption, and will begin to framework, inspired by scholarship within the field of organize and identify writing targets for a special social work [6]. As a means for information technology journal issue of JCSCW. (IT) developers to engage in discussions of oppression in its complexity, this process asks the designer to do Workshop Structure the work of recognizing the structural barriers and In an effort to avoid reinforcing a single, prescribed privilege that might be at play before the development notion of feminism or some predetermined of any IT begins. understanding of what might constitute scholarship under its banner, we approach the organization of this Drawing on these efforts within and beyond CSCW, our workshop through a lens of “producing a spirit of proposed workshop seeks to extend CSCW’s feminism” [14]. Here, we draw on three of our co- commitment to feminist theory by welcoming multiple authors experiences organizing and/or participating in and varied approaches to understanding oppression. one or both of the previous feminist CSCW workshops. Together we will engage in grounded speculation [4] In doing so, we aim to prioritize collective, participatory about the futures of intersectional feminist approaches activity, encourage pluralistic conversation, and focus to designing and researching social computing systems. on positionality (how one is positioned in relation one’s subject, one’s field, and so on). Workshop Goals and Outcomes The goals of the workshop are first and foremost to Pre-workshop Plans build a community of researchers and practitioners We will invite participants via our existing networks, working at the intersection of feminist theory and including mailing lists and social media groups with a CSCW. Specifically, we seek to facilitate conversations focus on distributing the call among scholars and necessary to move beyond any single conception of practitioners in the fields of HCI, feminist theory, 389 Workshop CSCW 2017, February 25–March 1, 2017, Portland, OR, USA design, science and technology studies, and information concerns raised during the WIP presentations. This will science. Participants will be selected based on the be an opportunity for researchers and practitioners to depth of their position papers in productively engaging discuss issues not typically addressed in traditional with concerns for intersectional feminist approaches academic fora. through design, or the thoughtfulness of their critiques. We hope to accept 20-25 participants.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gender-Inclusive HCI Research and Design: a Conceptual Review Full Text Available At
    Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000056 Gender-Inclusive HCI Research and Design: A Conceptual Review Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000056 Other titles in Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction Human-Food Interaction Rohit Ashok Khot and Florian Mueller ISBN: 978-1-68083-576-2 10 Lenses to Design Sports-HCI Florian Mueller and Damon Young ISBN: 978-1-68083-528-1 Values and Ethics in Human-Computer Interaction Katie Shilton ISBN: 978-1-68083-466-6 Research Fiction and Thought Experiments in Design Mark Blythe and Enrique Encinas ISBN: 978-1-68083-418-5 Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000056 Gender-Inclusive HCI Research and Design: A Conceptual Review Simone Stumpf Daniela Busse City, University of London, UK Oracle, USA [email protected] [email protected] Anicia Peters Jessica Cauchard Namibia University of Ben Gurion University Science and Technology of the Negev Namibia Israel [email protected] [email protected] Shaowen Bardzell Elizabeth Churchill Indiana University, USA Google, USA [email protected] [email protected] Margaret Burnett Oregon State University, USA [email protected] Boston — Delft Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000056 Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction Published, sold and distributed by: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 1024 Hanover, MA 02339 United States Tel. +1-781-985-4510 www.nowpublishers.com [email protected] Outside North America: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 179 2600 AD Delft The Netherlands Tel. +31-6-51115274 The preferred citation for this publication is S.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review: Gender Research in Human Computer Interaction
    Review Literature Review: Gender Research in Human Computer Interaction Sabrina Burtscher November 2019 “This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 741128”. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Definitions: Gender .................................................................................................................................... 4 Definitions: Human Computer Interaction (HCI) ...................................................................................... 6 Gender and Design/Research: Pitfalls ........................................................................................................ 7 I-methodology: “Everyone is like me” .................................................................................................. 7 One Size Fits All: “Everyone is the same” ............................................................................................ 8 Gender Stereotyping: “All women are alike” ....................................................................................... 8 Gender difference: “Women are inherently different” .......................................................................... 9 Case Studies ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Content
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Hci for Real: Designing Technology in Support of a Social Movement
    FEMINIST HCI FOR REAL: DESIGNING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF A SOCIAL MOVEMENT ADissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty by Jill P. Dimond In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Human-Centered Computing in the School of Interactive Computing Georgia Institute of Technology December 2012 FEMINIST HCI FOR REAL: DESIGNING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF A SOCIAL MOVEMENT Approved by: Professor Amy Bruckman, Advisor Professor Elizabeth Mynatt School of Interactive Computing School of Interactive Computing Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Wenda Bauschspies Professor Shaowen Bardzell School of History, Sciences, and School of Informatics and Computing Technology Indiana University Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Eric Gilbert Date Approved: 14 August 2012 School of Interactive Computing Georgia Institute of Technology For the Hollaback activists and for those working to stop street harassment. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There have been many people who have supported me in this journey—admittedly, it takes a community to raise a doctoral graduate. First, I would like to thank everyone from Hollaback. To Emily May for her tenac- ity, wisdom, friendship, and also for her openness to participate in this work—thank you for all that you do. To Inti Maria Tidball-Binz, Lauren Alston, Crystal Rodgers, and Daphne LaRose—I admire your strength, acumen, and judgement. Thank you all for reading drafts of my chapters and putting yourself out there so that this work can help us all to grow. I would also like to thank Veronica Pinto for her hard work in growing the Hollaback community. Thank you to Alex Alston and Amalia Rose for helping me conduct and transcribe the interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design
    CHI 2010: HCI For All April 10–15, 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design Shaowen Bardzell Indiana University School of Informatics and Computing 919 E 10th Street, Rm 237, Bloomington, IN 47408 [email protected] ABSTRACT ing moral and intellectual complexity of our professional Feminism is a natural ally to interaction design, due to its activities. central commitments to issues such as agency, fulfillment, identity, equity, empowerment, and social justice. In this This topic is hardly new to computing: science and technol- paper, I summarize the state of the art of feminism in HCI ogy studies (STS) and social informatics have long empha- and propose ways to build on existing successes to more sized these sorts of issues. Yet when it comes to interaction robustly integrate feminism into interaction design research design—HCI proper—these concerns come up in a much and practice. I explore the productive role of feminism in more piecemeal and ad hoc way. For the purpose of this analogous fields, such as industrial design, architecture, and paper, I therefore confine my focus to the relationships be- game design. I introduce examples of feminist interaction tween feminism and interaction design (as opposed to design already in the field. Finally, I propose a set of femi- “computing” or “technology” more generally). nist interaction design qualities intended to support design Specifically, I am concerned with the design and evaluation and evaluation processes directly as they unfold. of interactive systems that are imbued with sensitivity to the Author Keywords central commitments of feminism—agency, fulfillment, HCI, Feminist HCI, feminism, design, feminist standpoint identity and the self, equity, empowerment, diversity, and theory, gender, interaction design, feminist design qualities social justice.
    [Show full text]
  • A Speculative Feminist Approach to Design Project Management
    A Speculative Feminist Approach to Design Project Management Milena Radzikowska a | Jennifer Roberts-Smith b | Xinyue Zhou c | Stan Ruecker d * a Mount Royal University: Calgary, AB, USA. b University of Waterloo: Waterloo, ON, Canada. c Sun Yat-Sen University /SYSU: Guangzhou, Guangdong,China. d University of Illinois: Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA * Corresponding authors: [email protected] ABSTRACT In this paper, we discuss how taking a speculative feminist approach, as proposed by some members of the human-computer interaction (HCI) community, results in a radically different design of software for project management. As we interpret it, speculative feminist design in HCI demonstrates attention to the following six principles: challenging the status quo; designing for an actionable ideal; searching out the invisible; considering the micro, meso, and macro; privileging transparency; and welcoming critique. In the context of project management, our approach to software design has therefore included the following priorities: all stakeholders have goals, but not necessarily shared goals; the line between an internal deliverable and an external project outcome is blurred; impacts can occur immediately or decades later; impact assessment methods need to be explicit in the project planning system. In adopting the terms speculative feminism and critical feminism, we intend that our work be understood as situated within the territory of Critical Theory as applied particularly to the work of the Frankfurt School. We introduce our design, called It’s a Wicked World (IWW), as an example, although it is only the current iteration of one part of a larger, ongoing project. Keywords: speculative feminist design, project management, human-computer interaction, wicked problems.
    [Show full text]
  • I590: Technology & Gender
    Technology & Gender INFO I-590 • Spring 2017 In this seminar we will explore the literature on the history of gender and technology, with a particular focus on information technology. From the ”computer girls”of the early 20th century to the hyper- masculine culture of contemporary computing, developments in technology have reflected and transformed our understanding of sexuality and gender. Our goal in this seminar is to survey the best of the emerging literature on gender and computing, with an eye towards the practical application of gender theory into your future research projects. Professor Nathan Ensmenger [email protected] Revision Date: June 6, 2018 Course Schedule In addition to doing the required readings and preparing for discussions, you will be responsible for writing a short (1-2 pg) reading response paper each week. The supplementary readings and extended bibliography are meant to make you aware of the larger literature, and to provide a guide for those of you who need further preparation for your qualifying exams or dissertation research. A note on books: all of the articles listed below will be made available electronically. The books you are responsible for borrowing, purchasing, or otherwise acquiring. I did not order them via the bookstore, as in most cases you can find better bargains elsewhere. I January 11 Sherry Turkle. 1984a.“Hackers: Loving the Machine for Itself.”Simon and Schuster Supplemental Readings The chapter on amateur radio operators in Douglas (1987) provides a fascinating complement to the Turkle chapter on hackers that describes a similar phenomenon without reference to the uniquely immersive charac- teristics of electronic digital computers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theoretical Agenda for Feminist HCI ⇑ Jennifer A
    Interacting with Computers 23 (2011) 393–400 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Interacting with Computers journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/intcom A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI ⇑ Jennifer A. Rode Drexel University, United States Downloaded from article info abstract Article history: HCI has a complex and often ambivalent attitude towards the issue of gender and interactive systems. Available online 27 May 2011 Here I discuss three dominant paradigms for treating gender in HCI, and discuss their limitations. Next, I will present the theoretical perspectives on gender which are on the fringes of HCI – Technology as http://iwc.oxfordjournals.org/ Keywords: Masculine Culture, Gender Positionality, and Lived Body Experience – and discuss their possible contribu- Gender tions. I will show how this supports a reassessment of the use of gender theory in technological set- Critical theory tings and its relevance for framing questions of gender in HCI. My goal in doing so is to argue for Ethnography the importance of a more direct treatment of gender in HCI and move towards a feminist theory for Anthropology HCI. HCI Ó 2011 British Informatics Society Limited. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. at Univ of Southern California on January 10, 2017 1. Introduction ways in which gender roles are enacted and performed in everyday action. So, our question is not ‘‘do women and men display differ- HCI has a complex and often ambivalent attitude towards the ent aptitudes for technological tasks?’’ but rather,
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Stronger Plurality: Intimacy and Integrity in Designing for Social Innovation
    Seeking stronger plurality: Intimacy and integrity in designing for social innovation Yoko Akama, Communication Design, School of Media & Communication, RMIT University, Australia Joyce Yee, Interactive Media Design, Northumbria University, UK Abstract A seminal post-colonial scholar, Deborah Bird Rose (2004, 154) exclaims, ‘the west collectively is the leader; it is closest to the future, and the rest of the world follows along behind’. Similarly, Design and Social Innovation is largely populated by case studies in Europe and the US, further reinforcing global hierarchies and certain paradigms. We speak to this politics and dominance from the periphery and share early insights from two international symposia on Design and Social Innovation in Asia-Pacific (DESIAP) to highlight the importance of exchanging ideas in various directions. We use Kasulis’ (2002) heuristic of integrity to frame design that emphasizes rational, impersonal, discrete, externalised principles and models, in contrast to intimacy that starts from an interrelated view of designing that cannot be disentangled from the ecological, relational, intimate contexts in which it is performed. Using integrity and intimacy in our analysis, we heard practitioners undertaking community-led change speak of empathy, humility, respect, trust and emotional resonance that enhances the intimacy between entities already interrelated, embedded in contextual specificities. These cannot be abstracted by a model or a method for scaling or replication elsewhere, often desired in the dominant, integrity view of design. When relationships are foundational and heterogeneity is a contemporary context of designing with communities, we propose that the intimacy orientation can help shift from a weak form of pluralism towards a stronger one, and bring attention to cultural, emotional and relational entanglements that are integral to Design and Social Innovation – to work with, and through difference.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Feminist HCI Methodology: Social Science, Feminism, and HCI Shaowen Bardzell Jeffrey Bardzell Indiana University Indiana University 919 E 10Th St
    CHI 2011 • Session: HCI for all May 7–12, 2011 • Vancouver, BC, Canada Towards a Feminist HCI Methodology: Social Science, Feminism, and HCI Shaowen Bardzell Jeffrey Bardzell Indiana University Indiana University 919 E 10th St. 919 E 10th St. Bloomington, IN, 47408 Bloomington, IN, 47408 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT stakeholders, exemplified, for example, by sustainable in- With substantial efforts in ubiquitous computing, ICT4D, teraction design. and sustainable interaction design, among others, HCI is increasingly engaging with matters of social change that go In responding to these needs, HCI has turned to a wide beyond the immediate qualities of interaction. In doing so, range of cultural theories, from philosophical pragmatism to HCI takes on scientific and moral concerns. This paper ex- literary theory. A recent example of this trend is the notion plores the potential for feminist social science to contribute of “feminist HCI,” which [3] characterizes as the integra- to and potentially benefit from HCI’s rising interest in so- tion of feminist theory in HCI practice. Yet as promising as cial change. It describes how feminist contributions to de- feminist HCI seems, beyond clearing a space for feminist bates in the philosophy of science have helped clarify HCI and introducing a set of qualities that characterize fem- relationships among objectivity, values, data collection and inist interaction, [3] leaves open what exactly such an ap- interpretation, and social consequences. Feminists have proach might look like in practice. proposed and implemented strategies to pursue scientific Feminism seems well positioned to support HCI’s increas- and moral agendas together and with equal rigor.
    [Show full text]
  • (Women's) Health: HCI, Gender and Essentialised Embodiment
    Reimagining (Women’s) Health: HCI, Gender and Essentialised Embodiment OS KEYES and BURREN PEIL, University of Washington RUA M. WILLIAMS, University of Florida KATTA SPIEL, KU Leuven, University of Vienna, and TU Wien An ever-increasing body of work within HCI investigates questions of around “Women’s Health” with the aim to disrupt the status quo of defaulting to an implicit norm of cis-male bodies. This laudable and feminist project has the potential to drastically improve the inclusivity and availability of health care. To explore how this research attends to gender, embodiment and identity, we conducted a critical discourse analysis of 17 publications explicitly positioning themselves as works concerned with “Women’s Health”. We find essentialised articulations of embodiment and gender, though little discussion on the intersections of race, class, sexuality and cultural contexts. Through two speculative designs, we illustrate potential responses to our analysis: The Shadow Zine, a reflection of self and the Compass, a token for community1 care. Our work provides an opportunity to develop a broader frame of gender and health, one that centers (gendered) marginalised health by attending to the power structures of existing medical practices and norms. CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → HCI theory, concepts and models;•Social and pro- fessional topics → Gender; Race and ethnicity; Religious orientation; People with disabilities; Geographic characteristics; Cultural characteristics;•Applied computing → Consumer health; Additional Key Words and Phrases: Gender, essentialism, embodiment, health, critical theory, speculative design, marginalisation, women’s health ACM Reference format: Os Keyes, Burren Peil, Rua M. Williams, and Katta Spiel. 2020. Reimagining (Women’s) Health: HCI, Gender and Essentialised Embodiment.
    [Show full text]
  • User Agency As a Feminist Frame in Human Computer Interaction and Information Science Andrea R
    User Agency as a Feminist Frame in Human Computer Interaction and Information Science Andrea R. Marshall Drexel University College of Computing and Informatics Abstract User agency within sociotechnical contexts supports both feminist reflexivity in HCI research, and the feminist ethnographic tradition present within Information Science. User agency as a unifying scholarly frame between these two disciplines that in turn expand our understanding of gender identity formation within information and computing environments. Keywords: User Agency; Ethnography; Feminist Research; Human Computer Interaction; Information Science. doi: 10.9776/16262 Copyright: Copyright is held by the author. Contact: [email protected] Conta 1Cont Introduction Contact: HCI scholars are just beginning to become aware of IS literature that engages feminist grounded theory (Chatman 1996; Chatman 1999) based on ethnographic research into user populations. Normally, HCI and IS are “unconnected discourse communities” (Dervin, 1997, p. 115). It is important to further understand why gender research in HCI remains a controversial and multifaceted area of inquiry. Qualitative feminist researchers within HCI are beginning to investigate maker culture and hacker communities to understand the learning processes of user groups conventionally addressed in IS literature, such as children and amateur users who are not normally visible within computing environments (Fox et al., 2015; Weibert et al., 2014). Feminist IS literature has scrutinized nontraditional sociotechnical environments in terms of user agency, in the context both of female inmates in prison (Chatman 1999) and survivors of domestic violence (Westbrook 2006; Westbrook 2007). Both IS feminist literature and HCI feminist literature apply feminist ethnographic methods to critique masculinist norms of sociotechnical gender identity, in terms of marginalized user groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Race Theory for HCI Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu*1, Angela D
    CHI 2020 Paper CHI 2020, April 25–30, 2020, Honolulu, HI, USA Critical Race Theory for HCI Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu*1, Angela D. R. Smith*2, Alexandra To*3, Kentaro Toyama1 1University of Michigan 2Northwestern University 3Carnegie Mellon University Ann Arbor, MI USA Evanston, IL USA Pittsburgh, PA USA {iogburu,toyama}@umich.edu [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT papers highlighting race. For example, in a 2016 paper, “Does The human-computer interaction community has made some Technology Have Race?” Hankerson and colleagues enu- efforts toward racial diversity, but the outcomes remain mea- merate a number of digital technologies that have different ger. We introduce critical race theory and adapt it for HCI consequences for people of different races [63]. In 2018, to lay a theoretical basis for race-conscious efforts, both in Schlesinger, O’Hara, and Taylor consider the complexities research and within our community. Building on the theory’s of avoiding racism in chatbots, with conclusions that have original tenets, we argue that racism is pervasive in everyday broader scope [110]. Even more recently, O’Leary et al. socio-technical systems; that the HCI community is prone explore how “conventional design practices may perpetuate to “interest convergence,” where concessions to inclusion re- forms of institutional racism,” and suggest an alternative that quire benefits to those in power; and that the neoliberal under- emphasizes pre-existing forms of creativity [92]. pinnings of the technology industry itself propagate racism. It is not that racism has reappeared, as much as that ongoing Critical race theory uses storytelling as a means to upend deep- racism – that never went away – is currently receiving more seated assumptions, and we relate several personal stories to visibility.
    [Show full text]