DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Health, Safety and Security

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Chapter 16: Community Health, Safety and Security URS-EIA-REP-202375 Table of Contents 16 Community Health, Safety and Security .................................................. 16-1 16.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 16-1 16.2 Scoping ............................................................................................................ 16-1 16.2.1 Issues and Population Groups Scoped In ............................................... 16-2 16.2.2 Issues Scoped Out During the Assessment Stage ................................... 16-4 16.2.3 Differences in Scope between EIA and ESIA ........................................... 16-6 16.3 Spatial and Temporal Boundaries ...................................................................... 16-10 16.3.1 Project Description ............................................................................. 16-10 16.3.2 Project Location ................................................................................. 16-12 16.3.3 Study Area ......................................................................................... 16-12 16.3.4 Survey of Sites Subject to Health Protection ......................................... 16-12 16.4 Methodology and Data..................................................................................... 16-15 16.4.1 Primary Data and Surveys ................................................................... 16-15 16.4.2 Secondary Data .................................................................................. 16-16 16.4.3 Stakeholder Engagement .................................................................... 16-16 16.4.4 Data Assumptions, Limitations and Gaps .............................................. 16-19 16.5 Community Health, Safety and Security Baseline ............................................... 16-20 16.5.1 Demographic Community Profile .......................................................... 16-20 16.5.2 Morbidity, Incidence and Prevalence of Disease .................................... 16-20 16.5.3 Mental Health .................................................................................... 16-25 16.5.4 Baseline Data by Determinant of Health .............................................. 16-26 16.5.5 Emergency and Disaster Response ...................................................... 16-34 16.6 Legal and Policy Context .................................................................................. 16-34 16.6.1 IFC Performance Standards ................................................................. 16-34 16.6.2 National Legislation ............................................................................ 16-36 16.7 Impact Assessment Methodology ..................................................................... 16-40 16.7.1 Methodology ...................................................................................... 16-40 16.7.2 Determinants of Health ....................................................................... 16-41 16.7.3 Receptor Sensitivity ............................................................................ 16-41 16.7.4 Impact Magnitude .............................................................................. 16-43 16.7.5 Impact Significance Criteria ................................................................. 16-44 16.7.6 Impact Mitigation ............................................................................... 16-45 16.8 Assessment of Potential Impact: Community Health, Safety and Security ............ 16-46 16.8.1 Impact Assessment: Construction and Pre-Commissioning Phase .......... 16-49 16.8.2 Impact Assessment: Operational Phase ............................................... 16-79 16.8.3 Impact Assessment: Decommissioning Phase ....................................... 16-83 16.9 Unplanned Events ........................................................................................... 16-84 16.10 Cumulative Impacts .................................................................................... 16-84 16.11 Conclusion ................................................................................................. 16-84 URS-EIA-REP-202375 i Chapter 16 Community Health, Safety and Security Tables Table 16.1 Mortality and Health Indicators, Selected Years ............................................... 16-21 Table 16.2 Adult and Infant Mortality Rates (Per 1,000 People) for Bulgaria and Varna Region, 2005-2011 .................................................................................................................... 16-21 Table 16.3 Main Causes Of Mortality in Bulgaria and Varna Region (Per 100,000 People per Year), 2011 ................................................................................................................... 16-22 Table 16.4 Incidence of Sexually Transmitted Infections (Cases per 100,000 People), 2008-2010 .................................................................................................................................... 16-24 Table 16.5 Number of Physicians per 10,000 Residents in District Varna Municipality Asparuhovo (Data from RHI-Varna on 26.08.2013) ............................................................................ 16-32 Table 16.6 Determinants of Health .................................................................................. 16-41 Table 16.7 Receptor Sensitivity Criteria for Community Health and Safety .......................... 16-42 Table 16.8 Impact Magnitude Criteria .............................................................................. 16-44 Table 16.9 Significance Matrix ........................................................................................ 16-45 Table 16.10 The Mitigation Hierarchy Defined for Community Health and Safety ................ 16-45 Table 16.11 Potential Impacts Discussed in Other ESIA Chapters and Scoped Out the of the Community Health, Safety and Security Assessment ........................................................ 16-47 Table 16.12 Noise Levels Generated by Transport Noise from New Access Road ................. 16-55 Table 16.13 Pre-Commissioning Phase of South Stream Offshore Pipeline Residual Levels with Barrier .......................................................................................................................... 16-57 Table 16.14 Noise Levels Generated by Marshalling Yard Activity (Varna East) ................... 16-60 Table 16.15 Noise Levels Generated by Construction Activities (Including Microtunnelling) . 16-60 Table 16.16 Summary –of Residual Impacts during Construction and Pre-Commissioning Phase .................................................................................................................................... 16-74 Table 16.17 Summary of Residual Impacts during Operational Phase ................................ 16-82 Figures Figure 16.1 National, Regional, Municipal and Local Community Context of the Project ...... 16-13 Figure 16.2 Survey to Identify Health Protected Sites ....................................................... 16-17 Figure 16.3 Bathing Water Quality Test Sites and Data for 2012 ....................................... 16-31 ii URS-EIA-REP-202375 Figure 16.4 View from New Access Road Route (Left) to Nearest Residential Receptors at Priseltsi VZ (right) .......................................................................................................... 16-56 Figure 16.5 Transport Hospital Varna Location Relative to ESIA Noise and Vibration Assessment Receptors around Varna East Marshalling Yard ................................................................ 16-59 Figure 16.6 Junction of (Currently Unsurfaced) Access Road and Krushkite Road ............... 16-63 URS-EIA-REP-202375 iii 16 Community Health, Safety and Security 16.1 Introduction This chapter presents the potential health and safety impacts arising from Project-related activities, as well as Project security as it pertains to communities. This chapter forms part of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Report of the Bulgarian Sector of the South Stream Pipeline that will deliver natural gas from Russia to the countries of central and south-eastern Europe (‘the Project’). The community health, safety and security chapter considers the potential health impacts to national, regional and local population groups, including particularly vulnerable groups who may be disproportionately affected. The occupational health and safety assessment is included as Appendix 16.1: Occupational Health and Safety and considers the potential health impacts to the Project’s workforce and the regulatory framework that governs safe working practices. The approach has been guided by relevant legislative and policy requirements; including the International Finance Corporation (IFC) guidance on Health Impact Assessment (HIA) (Ref. 16.1). For example the approach addresses the two key characteristics required by the IFC guidance, namely: predicting the consequences of Project-related actions; and providing information that can help decision makers prioritize prevention and control strategies throughout the Project cycle. This has been achieved through: a scoping exercise examining the potential impacts of Project activities; a review of existing baseline health and safety conditions and key trends; evaluation of community views from stakeholder engagement; and a health assessment to classify potential health
Recommended publications
  • WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT Repealed SG No 53 of 13 July 2012

    WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT Repealed SG No 53 of 13 July 2012

    WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT Repealed SG No 53 of 13 July 2012 Promulgated, SG No. 86/30.09.2003, amended SG 70/10.08.2004, effective 1.01.2005, amended and supplemented, SG No. 77/27.09.2005, amended, SG No. 87/1.11.2005, effective 1.05.2006, amended and supplemented, SG No. 88/4.11.2005, amended, SG No. 95/29.11.2005, effective 1.03.2006, SG No. 105/29.12.2005, effective 1.01.2006, SG No. 30/11.04.2006, effective 12.07.2006, SG No. 34/25.04.2006, effective 1.01.2008 (*)(**), SG No. 63/4.08.2006, effective 4.08.2006, SG No. 36/4.04.2008, SG No. 70/8.08.2008, amended and supplemented, SG No. 105/9.12.2008, amended, SG No. 82/16.10.2009, effective 16.10.2009, supplemented, SG No. 95/1.12.2009, effective 11.08.2006, amended and supplemented, SG No. 41/1.06.2010, amended, SG No. 63/13.08.2010, SG No. 98/14.12.2010,effective 1.01.2011, SG No. 8/25.01.2011, effective 25.01.2011, amended and supplemented, SG No.30/12.04.2011,amended, SG No. 33/26.04.2011, effective 27.05.2011, SG No. 99/16.12.2011, effective 1.01.2012, amended by Judgment No. 3/21.03.2012 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria -SG No. 26/30.03.2012 (*) effective 1.07.2007 -amended, SG No. 80/3.10.2006, effective 3.10.2006 (**) effective 1.01.2008 -amended, SG No.
  • А Г Р О С Т А Т И С Т И К А a G R O S T a T I S T I

    А Г Р О С Т А Т И С Т И К А a G R O S T a T I S T I

    МИНИСТЕРСТВО на ЗЕМЕДЕЛИЕТО и ХРАНИТЕ СОФИЯ 1040, бул. “Христо Ботев” № 55 № 166 – декември 2010 А A СТРУКТУРА Г G НА ЛОЗЯТА В БЪЛГАРИЯ Р R О O юли 2009 година ОКОНЧАТЕЛНИ РЕЗУЛТАТИ С S Т T А A VINEYARD BASIC Т T SURVEY- BULGARIA И I С S July 2009 Т T FINAL RESULTS И I К C А S РЕЗУЛТАТИ И АНАЛИЗИ RESULTS AND ANALYSES МЗХ, ОТДЕЛ “АГРОСТАТИСТИКА” MAF, AGROSTATISTICS DEPARTMENT СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ CONTENTS І. Въведение ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 І. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ІІ. Основни дефиниции и понятия .................................................................................................................................................. 5 ІI. Basic definitions and terms ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 ІІІ. Резултати и анализи .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 ІІІ. Results and analysis .........................................................................................................................................................................
  • Company Profile

    Company Profile

    www.ecobulpack.com COMPANY PROFILE KEEP BULGARIA CLEAN FOR THE CHILDREN! PHILIPPE ROMBAUT Chairman of the Board of Directors of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of AGROPOLYCHIM JSC-Devnia e, ECOBULPACK are dedicated to keeping clean the environment of the country we live Wand raise our children in. This is why we rely on good partnerships with the State and Municipal Authorities, as well as the responsible business managers who have supported our efforts from the very beginning of our activity. Because all together we believe in the cause: “Keep Bulgaria clean for the children!” VIDIO VIDEV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of NIVA JSC-Kostinbrod,VIDONA JSC-Yambol t ECOBULPACK we guarantee the balance of interests between the companies releasing A packed goods on the market, on one hand, and the companies collecting and recycling waste, on the other. Thus we manage waste throughout its course - from generation to recycling. The funds ECOBULPACK accumulates are invested in the establishment of sustainable municipal separate waste collection systems following established European models with proven efficiency. DIMITAR ZOROV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Owner of “PARSHEVITSA” Dairy Products ince the establishment of the company we have relied on the principles of democracy as Swell as on an open and fair strategy. We welcome new shareholders. We offer the business an alternative in fulfilling its obligations to utilize packaged waste, while meeting national legislative requirements. We achieve shared responsibilities and reduce companies’ product- packaging fees. MILEN DIMITROV Procurator of ECOBULPACK s a result of our joint efforts and the professionalism of our work, we managed to turn AECOBULPACK JSC into the largest organization utilizing packaging waste, which so far have gained the confidence of more than 3 500 companies operating in the country.
  • L O Cal a Ctio N P Lan C Ity O F V Arn A

    L O Cal a Ctio N P Lan C Ity O F V Arn A

    City of VARNA - BULGARIA CITY WITH THE BEST LIVING CONDITIONS IN THE BLACK SEA REGION URBACTII 2011 July Plan Action Local of Varna City City of Varna overview Index Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Synopsis........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 The URBACT II Programme ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 The city of VARNA ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 The Local Action Plan ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Basic description of LAP intervention area ................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 The focus area .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • The Climate of Northeastern Bulgaria As a Prerequisite for the Occurrence of Adverse and Hazardous (Risk) Phenomena

    The Climate of Northeastern Bulgaria As a Prerequisite for the Occurrence of Adverse and Hazardous (Risk) Phenomena

    International Journal of Physical and Social Science Vol. 8 Issue 1, January 2018 ISSN: 2249-5894 Impact Factor: 6.644 Journal Homepage: http://www.ijmra.us, Email: [email protected] Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabell’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A The climate of Northeastern Bulgaria as a prerequisite for the occurrence of adverse and hazardous (risk) phenomena Nina Chenkova* Abstract: The geographical area of Northeastern Bulgaria boasts a specific climate conditions. They are a prerequisite for the expression of adverse and hazardous natural phenomena. This report analyses the genesis and location of the adverse and dangerous meteorological, climate and hydrological phenomena within the Northeastern Bulgaria, which determined by climate conditions. Keywords: Northeastern Bulgaria, climate conditions, adverse and hazardous meteorological, climate and hydrological phenomena * Assoc. Prof. Dimitar Vladev, PhD, “Konstantin Preslavsky” University of Shumen, Faculty of Natural Science, Department of Geogpaphy, Bulgaria 20 International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences http://www.ijmra.us, Email: [email protected] ISSN: 2249-5894 Impact Factor: 6.644 Introduction Adverse and hazardous natural phenomena are subject to greater interest in the last few decades, not only scientifically but also by practical application point of view. The reason is their negative impact on other branches of the economy: agriculture, transport, tourism and others. Phenomena with a similar effect, which run a small or negligible speed, defined as adverse. Under the influence of certain factors such phenomena may acquire extreme values in space and time and can cause substantial damage to natural complex and society, and to cause casualties.
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR

    Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR

    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria

    1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria

    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
  • Current State and Risk Vulnerability of Transport Networks and Related Infrastructural Systems in the Bulgarian Black Sea Coastal Region

    Current State and Risk Vulnerability of Transport Networks and Related Infrastructural Systems in the Bulgarian Black Sea Coastal Region

    h Current State and Risk Vulnerability of Transport Networks and Related Infrastructural Systems in the Bulgarian Black Sea Coastal Region Common borders. Common solutions. Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin 2014-2020 www.blacksea-cbc.net Table of Contents Purpose and Methodology of Study ................................................................................................ 4 Current State of Transport Networks .............................................................................................. 6 Qualitative Description of TRIS .................................................................................................... 9 Critical Infrastructure in the Coastal Region........................................................................... 17 Overall Transport System Vulnerability ..................................................................................... 19 Regional Quantitative Data ........................................................................................................ 25 TRIS Characteristics of Varna District .................................................................................... 26 TRIS Characteristics of Burgas District .................................................................................. 37 Traits and Considerations Valid for Both North and South Black Sea Coast ........................... 54 Critical Event Impacts on Regional TRIS ...................................................................................... 57 Major Types of Risks
  • Multilingualism in Varna LUCIDE City Report

    Multilingualism in Varna LUCIDE City Report

    Multilingualism in Varna LUCIDE city report LA OPE NG R UA U G E E R S O I F N Y U T R I B S A R N E V I C D O LUCIDE M D M N A U N N I O T I I T E A S R I N G E T E LA OP NG R UA U G E E R S O I F N Y U T R I B S A R N E V I C D O LUCIDE M D M N By Eleonora Tankova, Daniela Karagyaurova, A U N N I O T I I T E A S R I N G T E Blagoy Klimov and Kremena Hubcheva Language Errata and updates, including broken links: Centre www.urbanlanguages.eu/cityreports/errata Authors: Eleonora Tankova, Daniela Karagyaurova, Blagoy Klimov and Kremena Hubcheva Varna Free University “Chernorizets Hrabar” © LUCIDE Project and LSE 2015 All images © Varna Free University “Chernorizets Hrabar” unless otherwise stated Design by LSE Design Unit Published by: LSE Academic Publishing This report may be used or quoted for non-commercial reasons so long as both the LUCIDE consortium and the EC Lifelong Learning Program funding are acknowledged. www.urbanlanguages.eu www.facebook.com/urbanlanguages @urbanlanguages This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISBN: 978-1-909890-28-2 This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author(s), and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
  • Appendix 1 D Municipalities and Mountainous

    Appendix 1 D Municipalities and Mountainous

    National Agriculture and Rural Development Plan 2000-2006 APPENDIX 1 D MUNICIPALITIES AND MOUNTAINOUS SETTLEMENTS WITH POTENTIAL FOR RURAL TOURISM DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MUNICIPALITIES MOUNTAINOUS SETTLEMENTS Municipality Settlements* Izgrev, Belo pole, Bistrica, , Buchino, Bylgarchevo, Gabrovo, Gorno Bansko(1), Belitza, Gotze Delchev, Garmen, Kresna, Hyrsovo, Debochica, Delvino, Drenkovo, Dybrava, Elenovo, Klisura, BLAGOEVGRAD Petrich(1), Razlog, Sandanski(1), Satovcha, Simitly, Blagoevgrad Leshko, Lisiia, Marulevo, Moshtanec, Obel, Padesh, Rilci, Selishte, Strumiani, Hadjidimovo, Jacoruda. Logodaj, Cerovo Sungurlare, Sredets, Malko Tarnovo, Tzarevo (4), BOURGAS Primorsko(1), Sozopol(1), Pomorie(1), Nesebar(1), Aitos, Kamenovo, Karnobat, Ruen. Aksakovo, Avren, Biala, Dolni Chiflik, Dalgopol, VARNA Valchi Dol, Beloslav, Suvorovo, Provadia, Vetrino. Belchevci, Boichovci, Voneshta voda, Vyglevci, Goranovci, Doinovci, VELIKO Elena, Zlataritsa, Liaskovets, Pavlikeni, Polski Veliko Dolni Damianovci, Ivanovci, Iovchevci, Kladni dial, Klyshka reka, Lagerite, TARNOVO Trambesh, Strajitsa, Suhindol. Tarnovo Mishemorkov han, Nikiup, Piramidata, Prodanovci, Radkovci, Raikovci, Samsiite, Seimenite, Semkovci, Terziite, Todorovci, Ceperanite, Conkovci Belogradchik, Kula, Chuprene, Boinitsa, Bregovo, VIDIN Gramada, Dimovo, Makresh, Novo Selo, Rujintsi. Mezdra, Krivodol, Borovan, Biala Slatina, Oriahovo, VRATZA Vratza Zgorigrad, Liutadjik, Pavolche, Chelopek Roman, Hairedin. Angelov, Balanite, Bankovci, Bekriite, Bogdanchovci, Bojencite, Boinovci, Boicheta,
  • Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste

    Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste

    Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Develonment Europe and Central Asia Region 32051 BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION PriorityPublic Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste *t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized IC- - ; s - o Fk - L - -. Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized May 2004 - "Wo BULGARIA ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste May 2004 Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Europe and Central Asia Region Report No. 27770 - BUL Thefindings, interpretationsand conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Coverphoto is kindly provided by the external communication office of the World Bank County Office in Bulgaria. The report is printed on 30% post consumer recycledpaper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................... i Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................... ii Summary ..................................................................... iiM Introduction.iii Wastewater.iv InstitutionalIssues .xvi Recommendations........... xvii Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Part I: The Strategic Settings for
  • Varna District VALCHI DOL

    Varna District VALCHI DOL

    Varna District VALCHI DOL Vetrino > Population (2015) 473,365 SUVOROVO Aksakovo > Area (sq. km) 3,819.5 DEVNYA VARNA BELOSLAV > Number of settlements 159 PROVADIYA Avren > Share of urban population (%) 83.5 DALGOPOL DOLNI CHIFLIK BYALA Overview he district of Varna ranks third in the country, after The share of children attending junior high schools is still the capital and Stara Zagora in welfare measured via relatively low and the share of dropouts is larger than the TGDP per capita in 2014. Household incomes also stayed national. High school graduates perform better at matric- above average in 2015 but salaries remained low. The la- ulation exams, and Varna occupies one of the first places bor market in the district improved considerably in 2015. in the country in number of people with higher education Investment activity stayed relatively high but utilization of relative to the population. Administration of justice in the EU funds by municipal administrations in the district was district is also given a relatively positive evaluation but below the national average. Varna is a significant trans- the registered crimes remain above the country average port hub. number, while clearance crime rate is relatively low. Varna The demographic picture in the district of Varna contin- ranks second in the number of visits to cinemas after the ues to be more favorable than elsewhere in the country. capital. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Weak Unsatisfactory Average Good Very good Weak Unsatisfactory Average Good Very good Income and Living Conditions Demography Labor Market Education Investment Healthcare Infrastructure Security and Justice Taxes and Fees Environment Administration Culture Varna District 109 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Income and Living Conditions The district of Varna ranked third (after the capital and Sta- utilized the largest sum: 4,390.0 BGN per capita, while that ra Zagora) in the country in welfare measured through GDP of Dalgopol utilized the smallest (110.0 BGN per capita).