DOCSLIB.ORG

A>¶D Cv^Rc\D ^Zdt` Decfvu+ A>@

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A>¶D Cv^Rc\D ^Zdt` Decfvu+ A>@ VRGR $"#(!#1')VCEBRS WWT!Pa!RT%&!$"#1$# 3(( I ." 345..)64.J8." "%64.J8."J ,.$/%),!'0 ;9 "%+ ,,-' B*:4%<3*8845 !0"2 !0/ 1.+ E/!:<<!/<# +<*;;-#:!<;<*:<-F -!*C*<::DE< *<!-: '*:<G#'- F-!9-E/0 +-'$-;-H:$--( !" 1 1 21 3*&4 $ %'( $) R :#* **: * R P ! "# $ $ "# P " * <#<;'/ day after Prime Minister ."4""."+" * <#<;'/ tors of India-China border ANarendra Modi stated .549" areas, including in Galwan val- M before all-party meeting that )"%.44 ndia and China are now ley. They abide by it scrupu- M Chinese “neither entered our 4.;*9"3. Iengaged in a bitter war of lously here, as they do else- territory nor has any post been 3.44." words for status of the Galwan where, the MEA said. ! " taken over by them on the - valley with China laying claim The armies of the two #$" Indian side”, the Government 434."..". to it and India terming it a countries are in a stand-off here % &' on Saturday issued a clarifica- 45" “exaggerated and untenable” for the last one month after the % !# tion that focussed on the .3345<* assertion. Chinese army stopped an Q % ! bloody clash on the night of -4L4. China fired the first shot Indian patrol and objected to Q ! June 15 between Chinese and when it added a new twist to the construction of a bridge. ;*9M<*L." Indian jawans but remained ..3;*9M ongoing tension at the Line of India, all along, has main- )% silent on which side of the LAC Actual Control (LAC) in tained that the bridge and the *+ ! it took place. 434."43 Ladakh by laying claim to the 250-km Shyok-Daulat Beg The Prime Minister’s 345%.3@."3. entire Galwan valley and blam- Oldie road running parallel to ,-.* Office (PMO) said attempts are 8"%4 ing India for fomenting trou- the LAC is in its region and the ! being made to give “mischie- "."./"". ble leading to the bloody clash- Chinese have no right to inter- $/ Q " vous interpretation” to Prime )39""O es on June 15 leading to killing fere. Incidentally, India has fin- ! / Minister’s remarks at the all- ""... of 20 India soldiers. ished the construction of the 60 party meeting while referring “India hit back by saying metre bridge in the valley. !0 to the Galwan valley clash in the PM faced barrage of ques- LAC (unhe rokte hain, unhe regards transgression of LAC, the position with regard to The Chinese official state- 1 ,-.,2 Ladakh on the intervening tion from military experts and tokte hain),” said the statement it was clearly stated that the vio- Galwan valley area has been ment issued through its 3 455 nights of June 15-16. strategic analysts on how the from the PMO. lence in Galwan on June 15 historically clear. Attempts by Embassy in the early hours of 6 “As regards transgression of Indian soldiers were killed if Attempts are being made in arose because Chinese side Chinese side to now advance Saturday came hours after " ! LAC, it was clearly stated that the Chinese side didn’t intrude some quarters to give a mis- was seeking to erect structures exaggerated and untenable Prime Minister Narendra the violence in Galwan on into our territory. chievous interpretation to just across the LAC and refused claims with regard to LAC Modi’s meeting with heads of 7 $ " June 15 arose because Chinese But the statement didn’t remarks by the Prime Minister to desist from such actions,” the there aren’t acceptable. They all parties on the bloody brawl " / !0 2 side was seeking to erect struc- clarify if across the LAC has on Friday, it said. PMO said. aren’t in accordance with in the Galwan Valley and situ- 8 tures just across the LAC and been used to describe the “The all-party meeting was The Prime Minister paid China’s own past position,” ation on the LAC. 6 % refused to desist from such Indian side of the LAC or also informed that this time, glowing tributes to the valour Ministry of External Affair In its statement the actions,” clarified the PMO. Chinese side. Chinese forces have come in and patriotism of our armed said in a statement on Saturday. Chinese Government said “the #! ! Q 2 The clarification does not “The Prime Minister was much larger strength to the forces “who repulsed the The MEA also said Indian Galwan Valley is located on the $ ! $ % %! match with what has been stat- clear that India would respond LAC and that the Indian designs of the Chinese there”. troops were fully familiar with Chinese side of the LAC in the 9 2 %/ ed by the Ministry of External firmly to any attempts to trans- response is commensurate. As Turn to Page 6 the alignment of LAC in all sec- western section of the Sino- ! " Affairs (MEA) three times. gress the Line of Actual Control Indian border.” On Tuesday, " $ $ The PMO said structures (LAC). In fact, he specifically the People’s Liberation Army’s “across the LAC” while the emphasised that in contrast to (PLA) Western Theatre : 2 MEA had said “on our side of the past neglect of such chal- Command spokesman Colonel " & the LAC”. lenges, Indian forces now deci- Zhang Shuili said, “China " '" The clarification came after sively counter any violations of always owns sovereignty over !' " the Galwan Valley region.” Reacting to the PLA statement, " " " 2 India’s Ministry of External $ " ' Affairs described the claims as “exaggerated and untenable. "!$L ! Accusing China of trying " $ * to create hindrance in patrol " " M %/M duty performed by Indian ! # jawans, the MEA said, “Since ! early May 2020, Chinese have $ ' 2/ been hindering India’s normal " & patrolling pattern in the area. 2 This resulted in face-off which +' , ," $ was addressed by ground com- !" ! " ' 2 3 4 ! manders. We don’t accept the "&. 6 % * <#<;'/ Narendra Modi’s concluding ! 5 * contention that India was uni- # $*! M remarks at the all-party meet- laterally changing status quo.” M n one of his sharpest attacks ing on the border issue with Turn to Page 6 !!" &#$ 2 Ion the Prime Minister, for- China, the Congress stated / 0 Q mer Congress chief Rahul that the PMO’s statement was # Q% " " Gandhi on Sunday alleged “clearly a lame attempt to # & Q Narendra Modi has “surren- obfuscate the truth”. ! R& 'Q ( %R $ " 1 " ! Q dered” Indian territory to Former Union Minister P &2 Chinese aggression. Chidambaram too hit out at * <#<;'/ ) & $ " A day after the Prime Modi and said his statements at !"#$%")./"" Minister asserted that the the all-party meeting as the Chinese People’s Liberation Washington: US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has 010.."3. ! Chinese troops did not intrude is “baffling” and left everyone HArmy re-entered Doklam? BJP leader criticised the Chinese Army for “escalating” the bor- .%." 2 & % /! into the Indian territory, Rahul “bewildered”. and Rajya Sabha member Subramanian der tension with India and militarising the strategic "%3.4%. 5 Gandhi asked why and where “It is quite obvious that the Swamy on Saturday referred to interna- South China Sea as he described the ruling 5""36 were the Indian soldiers killed PM’s statement contradicts the tional media reports to ask if China has Communist Party of China as a “rogue actor”. "3." " "45 # & ! if the land, where the “violent earlier statements made by the scrapped the agreement on Doklam with In a scathing attack on the Chinese Government, ." 4 face-off” happened, was a Army chief, the Defence India which the two nations had agreed Pompeo said the Communist Party of China wants %"."O."%8 % Chinese territory. Minister and the Foreign upon last year. to undo all the progress the free world has made %. 4.". ! “The PM has surrendered Minister. PM Modi’s remarks China had agreed to withdraw troops through institutions like the NATO and adopt a new ."6 9 2 Indian territory to Chinese have left everyone baffled and from Dokhlam after the agreement, how- set of rules and norms that accommodate Beijing. ! aggression. If the land was bewildered. If no Chinese ever, with the ongoing situation over LAC, “The People’s Liberation Army has escalated bor- & Chinese: 1. Why were our sol- troops have crossed into our Swamy quoted sources as saying the der tensions with India, the world’s most populous & / diers killed? 2. Where were they territory what was the face-off Chinese People’s Liberation Army has re- democracy. It’s militarising the South China Sea and ' '%!)*8.30 ! killed?” Rahul asked through a on May 5 and May 6. Where entered Doklam, and asked the illegally claiming more territory there, threatening .""%"5.%8 M tweet message. were our troops martyred and Government to clarify on the issue if its true vital sea lanes,” Pompeo said, a day after he expressed 3."%" " Q Hours after the PMO injured,” asked Chidambaram. or baseless. condolences on the death of 20 Indian soldiers. PTI "."98" ) M issued a clarification regarding Turn to Page 6 Turn to Page 6 Detailed report on P7 "%5."%.":6 ! % Q ! 3 2 -./ 2# & ++ #
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kings RAF Booklet
    Combined Cadet Force Royal Air Force A Commissioning Aide Memoire for the Officer Cadre Version 1 “Where else could you learn to fly aerobatics, visit Royal Air Force Stations, tour foreign countries, play sports from local to international level, learn the skills to lead expeditions, become a target shooting marksman, gain your Duke of Edinburgh Awards, canoe through white water, assist your community, join a band, learn aviation subjects, go caving, parachute, climb, sail, ski...? These and much more are readily available to you as a member of the Air Cadet Organization.” Air Commodore Jon Chitty OBE. Introduction The school cadet organisation originates from 1859, when schools at Eton, Harrow, Rugby, Rossall, Felsted, Hurstpierpoint, Winchester and Tonbridge formed armed uniformed units as part of a national reserve to counter a perceived threat from abroad. By 1900, cadet units were established in over 100 schools across the country and in 1908, these units were re-titled the Officer Training Corps (OTC). In 1948, the OTC was renamed the Combined Cadet Force. The aim of the Combined Cadet Force is to provide a framework through which young people develop the qualities of team work, self-reliance, resourcefulness, leadership and responsibility. A weekly programme of military training is designed to give young people at King’s a chance to exercise responsibility and leadership, to provide them with knowledge of our defence forces, and to encourage those who might be interested in becoming officers of the Armed Services. Uniform members of the Combined Cadet Force will regularly stay on Royal Air Forces bases, therefore it is important that cadets are able to demonstrate an awareness of the structure and organisation of the Royal Air Force, its role in the defence of the United Kingdom and her interests and the operations in which the Royal Air Force are currently engaged.
    [Show full text]
  • The Air Force Act, 1950 ______Arrangement of Sections ______
    THE AIR FORCE ACT, 1950 ______ ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS ______ CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Persons subject to this Act. 3. Termination of application of the Act. 4. Definitions. CHAPTER II SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF ACT IN CERTAIN CASES 5. Application of Act to certain forces under the Central Government. 6. Special provision as to rank in certain cases. 7. Commanding Officer of person subject to Air Force law under clause (d) of section 2. 8. Officers exercising powers in certain cases. 9. Power to declare persons to be on active service. CHAPTER III COMMISSION, APPOINTMENT AND ENROLMENT 10. Commission and appointment. 11. Ineligibility of aliens for enrolment. 12. Ineligibility of females for enrolment or employment. 13. Procedure before enrolling officer. 14. Mode of enrolment. 15. Validity of enrolment. 16. Persons to be attested. 17. Mode of attestation. 1 CHAPTER IV CONDITIONS OF SERVICE SECTIONS 18. Tenure of service under the Act. 19. Termination of service by Central Government. 20. Dismissal, removal or reduction by Chief of the Air staff and other officers. 21. Power to modify certain fundamental rights in their application to persons subject to this Act. 22. Retirement, release or discharge. 23. Certificate on termination of service. 24. Discharge or dismissal when out of India. CHAPTER V SERVICE PRIVILEGES 25. Authorised deductions only to be made from pay. 26. Remedy of aggrieved airmen. 27. Remedy of aggrieved officers. 28. Immunity from attachment. 29. Immunity from arrest for debt. 30. Immunity of persons attending courts-martial from arrest. 31. Privileges of reservists.
    [Show full text]
  • Air University Review: March-April 1977, Volume XXVIII, No. 3
    The Professional Journal of the United States A ir Force the editors aerie Dr. Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr., in our lead article, "Emerging Major Power Relationships," reflects on the shifting great power triangle of the United States, the Soviet Union, and the Peop!e's Republic of China. The cover, by Art Editor/lllustrator Bill DePaola, depicts an American eagle warily observing this triangle in a graphic elaboration of an abstract theme. For the first time in the experience of this editor, the Awards Committee members were unanimous in their first place votes for Major Don Alberts's "A Call from the Wilderness'' in the November-December 1976 issue. Aspiring authors who want to gain insight into subject matter that receives a very receptive reading by our editorial panei may want to re-examine that article. To the 50 percent of Air Force officers who necessarily receive an efficiency rating of three or below, it may be of more than passing interest to learn that the pseudonymous author of "I Am a Three" was recently promoted. You won't find Major Mark Wynn's name on the lieutenant colonel's promotion list, but we have it on good authority that the author who appeared under that nom de plume in the September-October 1976 issue is a living example that "threes" are promotable. Congratulations would seem to be appropriate, but how does one congratulate the anonymous? In this issue we find ourselves in the slightly embarrassed position of publishing an article by a member of the Air University Review Awards Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Air Force Historical Society
    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 49 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. First published in the UK in 2010 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361 4231 Printed by Windrush Group Windrush House Avenue Two Station Lane Witney OX28 4XW 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice8President Air 2arshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KC3 C3E AFC Committee Chairman Air 7ice82arshal N 3 3aldwin C3 C3E 7ice8Chairman -roup Captain 9 D Heron O3E Secretary -roup Captain K 9 Dearman FRAeS 2embership Secretary Dr 9ack Dunham PhD CPsychol A2RAeS Treasurer 9 3oyes TD CA 2embers Air Commodore - R Pitchfork 23E 3A FRAes ,in Commander C Cummin s :9 S Cox Esq 3A 2A :A72 P Dye O3E 3Sc(En ) CEn AC-I 2RAeS :-roup Captain 2 I Hart 2A 2A 2Phil RAF :,in Commander C Hunter 22DS RAF Editor & Publications ,in Commander C - 9efford 23E 3A 2ana er :Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS THE PRE8,AR DE7E.OP2ENT OF DO2INION AIR 7 FORCES by Sebastian Cox ANS,ERIN- THE @O.D COUNTRABSB CA.. by , Cdr 11 Colin Cummin s ‘REPEAT, PLEASE!’ PO.ES AND CCECHOS.O7AKS IN 35 THE 3ATT.E OF 3RITAIN by Peter Devitt A..IES AT ,ARE THE RAF AND THE ,ESTERN 51 EUROPEAN AIR FORCES, 1940845 by Stuart Hadaway 2ORNIN- G&A 76 INTERNATIONA.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, ?Th January 1969
    206 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, ?TH JANUARY 1969 DENTAL BRANCH Transfer to General List Air Commodore to Air Vice-Marshal The undermentioned Squadron Leaders are trans- C. H. BEAMISH, F.D.S., R.C.S. 1st Jan. 1969. ferred to the General List: 1st Jan. 1969 EDUCATION BRANCH D. C.FERGUSON (3511197). Squadron Leader to Wing Commander M. A. FISH (3120808). 1st Jan. 1969 D. N. HODGES (4119213). A. E. SILVESTER, M.A. (2378356). R. V. A. MUNRO, A.F.C. (584210). E. N. MEATS, B.Sc. (503265). L. A. ROSEVEARE (2574838). M. J. SPARROW (4043740). PROVOST BRANCH S. D. TAYLOR (2431435). H. B. WILLIAMSON (4041419). Wing Commander to Group Captain B. C. PLAYER (168147). 1st Jan. 1969. Transfer to General List (Ground Branch) Squadron Leader to Wing Commander The undermentioned Squadron Leaders are trans- D. R. PHOSSER-HIGDON (503782). 1st Jan. ferred to the General List: 1969. 1st Jan. 1969 Flight Lieutenant to Squadron Leader D. A. EMERY (4060876). A. J. RICHARDSON (4036284). 1st Jan. 1969 C. M. BURTON (506983). Regrading A. CAVE (505121). Acting Pilot Officer to Pilot Officer : R. W. RANDALL (4230211). R. I. PATRICK (689428). llth Nov. 1968. Grant of Acting Rank CATERING BRANCH Air Commodore A. H. W. BALL, C.B., D.S.O., D.F.C., is granted the Acting Rank of Air Vice- Flight Lieutenant to Squadron Leader 1 P. QUANT (506304). 1st Jan. 1969. Marshal . 16th Dec. 1968. Flight Lieutenant to Squadron Leader (Supplemen- Transfer between Branches Flight Lieutenant J. S. PUDWELL (2433746) is tary List) 1 D. W. J. BUTLER, D.F.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Command & Commanders in Modern Warfare
    COMMAND AND COMMANDERS , \ .“‘,“3,w) .br .br “Z ,+( ’> , . I ..M IN MODERN WARFARE The Proceedings of the Second Military History Symposium U.S. Air Force Academy 23 May 1968 Edited by William Geffen, Lt. Colonel, USAF, Air Force Academy O5ce of Air Force History, Headquarters USAF and United States Air Force Academy 1971 2nd edilion, enlarged let edition, United States Air Force Academy, 1969 Views or opinions expressed or implied in this publication are those of the authors and are not to be construed as carrying official sanction of the Department of the Air Force or of the United States Air Force Academy. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, US. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $2.65 Stock Number 0874-0003 ii PREFACE The essays and commentaries which comprise this book re- sulted from the Second Annual Military History Symposium, held at the Air Force Academy on 2-3 May 1968. The Military History Symposium is an annual event sponsored jointly by the Department of History and the Association of Graduates, United States Air Force Academy. The theme of the first symposium, held on 4-5May 1967 at the Air Force Academy, was “Current Concepts in Military History.” Several factors inspired the inauguration of the symposium series, the foremost being the expanding interest in the field of military history demonstrated at recent meetings of the American Historical Association and similar professional organizations. A professional meeting devoted solely to the subject of military his- tory seemed appropriate. The Air Force Academy’s Department of History has been particularly concerned with the history of military affairs and warfare since the founding of the institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Lntervie 2C 9 )1-) K239.0512-1353 Ap I - 1 Tu Maj Gen Richard L
    AlRl.941109.002 x w 3 ;rJ rn U. S. Air 4 0 Oral History lntervie 2c 9 )1-) K239.0512-1353 ap I - 1 tu Maj Gen Richard L. Meiling N 25-28 Oct 1982 ALBERT F. SIMPSON HISTORICAL RESEARCH CENTER OFFICE OF AIR FORCE HISTORY Headquarters USAF UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ORAL HISTORY PROGRAM I n t ervi ew of Maj Gen Richard L. Meiling BY Capt Mark C. Cleary Date: 25-28 October 1982 Location: Maxwell AFB, Alabama Edited and Transcribed by Beth F. Scott ORAL HISTCRY TRWSCRIPT ACCESS GRANTED DATE- I I FOREl’iORD One of the oldest and oft-used sources for reconstructing the past is the personal recollections of the individuals who were involved. While of great value, memoirs and oral interviews are primary source documents rather than finished history. The following pages are the personal remembrances of the interviewee and not the official opinion of the US Air Force Historical Program or of the Department of the Air Force. The Air Force has not verified the statements contained herein and does not ;issume any responsibility for their accuracy. These pages are a transcript of an oral interview recorded on magnetic tape. Editorial notes and additions made by US Air Force historians have been enclosed in brackets. When feasible, first names, ranks, or titles have been provided. Only minor changes for the sake of clarity were made before the transcript was returned to the interviewee for final editing and approval. Readers must therefore remember that this is a transcript of the spoken, rather than the written, word.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Air Command: the Development of Royal Air Force Practice in the Second World
    SUPREME AIR COMMAND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ROYAL AIR FORCE COMMAND PRACTICE IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR By DAVID WALKER A Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham January 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the development of RAF high command of the Metropolitan Air Force (MAF) during the Second World War. It sheds new light on the re-organisations of the Air Ministry in 1934, the RAF Command structure in 1936, and the tri-service debate in 1937 concerning the RAF proposal to establish a Supreme Air Commander (SAC). It reveals that while frontline expansion created an impetus for re-organisation, it was operational readiness that was the dominant factor in the re-structuring of the RAF. It examines the transition in RAF frontline organization from the mono-functional command system of 1936 to the multi- functional organisation that emerged after 1943 by looking at command structure and practice, personalities, and operational thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Act, 1955 3 & 4 Eliz
    Air Force Act, 1955 3 & 4 ELIz. 2 CH. 19 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I ENLISTMENT AND TERMS OF SERVICE Enlistment Section 1. Recruiting officers. 2. Enlistment. Enlistmentfor general or corps service 3. Enlistment for general or corps service. Terms and conditions of service 4. Terms of enlistment. 5. Change of conditions of service by extension of term or of air-force service. 6. Change of conditions of service by transfer to or from the reserve. 7. Re-engagement. Extension of service 8. Continuance in service after term of re-engagement. 9. Postponement in certain cases of discharge or transfer to the reserve. 10. Continuation of air-force service in imminent national danger. Discharge and transfer to reserve 11. Discharge. 12. Transfer to the reserve. 13. Postponement of discharge or transfer pending proceedings for offences. 14. Right of recruit to purchase discharge. 15. Right of warrant officer to discharge on reduction to ranks. 16. Discharge of airmen of unsound mind. CH. 19 Air Force Act, 1955 3 & 4 ELIZ. 2 Miscellaneous and supplementary provisions Section 17. Forfeiture of service for desertion and restoration of forfeited service. 18. Validity of attestation and enlistment. 19. False answers in attestation paper. 20. Special provisions as to National Service men. 21. Service of aliens in regular air force. 22. Regulations as to enlistment. 23. Interpretation. PART II DISCIPLINE AND TRIAL AND PUNISHMENT OF AIR-FORCE OFFENCES Treachery, cowardice and offences arising out of airforce service 24. Aiding the enemy. 25. Communication with the enemy. 26. Cowardly behaviour. 27. Offences against morale. 28. Becoming prisoner of war through disobedience or wilful neglect; and failure to rejoin forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Crosswalk
    The State Auditor’s Office Military Crosswalk Military Crosswalk Guide OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORY - PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Job Classification Series - Staff Services Officer Army Military Occupational Codes Navy Ratings and Designators Coast Guard Ratings Marine Corps Occupational Codes Air Force Specialty Codes Job Classification Number/Title Enlisted Officer Enlisted Officer Enlisted Officer Enlisted Officer Enlisted Officer Code Description Code Description Code Description Code Description Code Description Code Description Code Description Code Description Code Description Code Description 1550 - Staff Services Officer I 36B Financial Management 36A Financial Manager LS Logistic Specialist 120X RL - Human SK Storekeeper F&S Finance and Supply 0111 Administrative 0102 Manpower Officer 2G0X1 Logistics Plans 16GX Air Force 1551 - Staff Services Officer II Technician Resources (Warrant) Specialist Operations Staff 1552 - Staff Services Officer III Officer 1553 - Staff Services Officer IV 42A Human Resources 42B Human Resources LSS Logistic Specialist 641X LDO - YN Yeoman FIN10 Finance 0147 Equal Opportunity 0160 Postal Officer 3F0X1 Personnel 20C0 Logistics 1554 - Staff Services Officer V Specialist Officer (Submarine) Administration Advisor (EOA) (Warrant) Commander 51C Contracting 42H Senior Human PS Personnel Specialist PERS Personnel 0161 Postal Clerk 0170 Personnel Officer 3F1X1 Services 30C0 Support Noncommissioned Resources Officer Administration (Warrant) Commander Officer (NCO) (Warrant) 89A Ammunition Stock 51C Contract and YN Yeoman
    [Show full text]
  • AIR CHIEF MARSHALS: AUGUST 2021 July 2019: Air Chief Marshal
    AIR CHIEF MARSHALS: SEPTEMBER 2021 July 2019: Air Chief Marshal Sir Michael Wigston: Chief of the Air Staff, July 2019 (2/1968; 53) AIR MARSHALS: SEPTEMBER 2021 April 2018: Air Marshal Edward J. Stringer December 2018: Air Marshal Richard J. Knighton: Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff (Military Capability), December 2018 (11/1969; 51) March 2019: Air Marshal Susan C. Gray: Director-General, Defence Safety Authority, March 2019 (10/1963; 57) May 2019: Air Marshal Gerald M.D. Mayhew: Deputy Commander, Operations, Air Command May 2019 (2/1969; 52) Air Marshal Andrew M. Turner: Deputy Commander, Capability, Air Command and Air Member for Personnel and Capability, May 2019 (1967; 53) February 2021: Air Marshal Martin E. Sampson: Defence Senior Advisor, Middle East, February 2021 April 2021: Air Marshal Ian D. Gale: Director-General, Defence Academy and Joint Force Development, April 2021 AIR VICE-MARSHALS: SEPTEMBER 2021 June 2016: (Pers.) Air Vice-Marshal Garry Tunnicliffe: Deputy Commandant, Royal College of Defence Studies, April 2019 (10/1966; 54 ) December 2016: Air Vice-Marshal Steven J. Shell: Director, Military Aviation Authority, December 2018-December 2021 July 2017: Air Vice-Marshal Warren A.W. James: to retire October 2017: (Intell.) Air Vice-Marshal Michael P. Hart February 2018: (Eng.) Air Vice-Marshal Christopher J. Moore: to retire Air Vice-Marshal Ian F. Vallely Air Vice-Marshal John J. Stringer: professional placement at Rebellion Defense, May 2021 ( 11/1969; 51) July 2018: Air Vice-Marshal Harvey Smyth: Director, Space, M.O.D., February 2020 October 2018: Air Vice-Marshal Ian W. Duguid: Chief of Staff, Operations, Air Command, October 2018, and AOC, No.11 Group, November 2018-December 2021 (12/1966; 54) December 2018: Air Vice-Marshal Simon D.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Graduates & Former Cadets Glossary of Abbreviations
    Register of Graduates & Former Cadets Glossary of Abbreviations & Codes Indicates a direct ancestor or a direct descendent, or both, of another graduate * Indicates a Distinguished Cadet (order of merit) A–age/aged ABMC–American Battle Monuments Commission A–Appointed Abn–Airborne A–Armored AC–Army Air Corps A–Army AcadAffrs–Academic Affairs A–Assistant ACC–Army Communications Command A–Attaché Acct–Account/Accounting AA–Additional Appointee ACDA–Arms Control & Disarmament Agency AA–Anti-Aircraft (Artillery) ACDC–Army Combat Developments Command AA–Army Attaché ACE–Analysis and Control Element A&A–Astronomy & Astrophysics ACEMLF–Allied Command Europe Mobile Land Force AAA–Anti-Aircraft Artillery ACERT–Army Computer Emergency Response Team AAC–Anti-Aircraft Command ACJCS–Assistant to the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff AAC–Army Acquisition Corps ACLC–Aviation Center Logistics Command AAC&GMC–Anti-Aircraft and Guided Missile Center ACM–Afghanistan Campaign Medal AAC&GMS–Anti-Aircraft and Guided Missile School AcqPolDiv–Acquisition Policy Division AACS–Airways and Air Communications Service ACR–Armored Cavalry Regiment AAD–Air Assault Division AC/RC–Active Component/Reserve Component AADAC–Army Air Defense Artillery Center ACS–Air Commando Squadron AADC–Army Armament Development Center ACS–Assistant Chief of Staff AADC–Army Armament Development Command ACSAC–Assistant Chief of Staff for Automation & AAE–Aeronautical & Astronautics Engineer Communications AAF–Army Air Forces ACSC–Air Command & Staff College AAF–Army Airfield ACSCCIM–Assistant
    [Show full text]