Information to Users

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Information to Users INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from themicrofilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandardm arg ins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6N x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. A Bell & Howell information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 FEEDING BEHAVIOR OF THE ELM LEAF BEETLE, XANTHOGALERUCA LUTEOLA (MULLER), IN RESPONSE TO LEAF EXTRACTS MADE FROM RESISTANT AND SUSCEPTIBLE ELMS, (ULMUS SPP.). A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University by Janet Lea Murphy, B.S., M.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 1995 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Raymond W. Doskotch Richard W. Hall T. Davis Sydnor cuu Adviser Dana L. Wrensch Department of Entomology UNI Number: 9544651 UMI Microform 9544651 Copyright 1995, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Copyright by Janet Lea Murphy 1995 My strength is as the strength of ten, Because my heart is pure. Sir Galahad Lord Alfred Tennyson ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee: Dr. Richard W. Hall for time, energy and advice given me during the past several years; Dr. Raymond W. Doskotch for his interest in my project and willingness to assist me; Dr. Dana L. Wrensch for her endless ent-thusiasm and moral support; and Dr. T. Davis Sydnor for his horticultural expertise. Special thanks to Pamela Boner for her time and patience in instructing me on the use of equipment in her lab and on how to not flood the place. I owe a debt of gratitude to my family, especially to my dad who's asked me about 900 times, "When ya gonna be done?" and to my friends, especially Kathy Bruner, for feeding me and prodding me along. And thanks mostly to my sweetie, Dave, who’s always been there for me and supported everything I've wanted to do. What a guy!! VITA June 10, 1963 ................................................... Bom - Chilton, Wisconsin 1986 .................................................................. B.S., The Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 1986-1987 ........................................................ Student Intern, The Chicago Botanic Garden, Glencoe, Illinois 1988-1991 ........................................................ M.S., The Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1988-Present .................................................... Graduate Teaching and Research Assistant, The Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio FIELD OF STUDY Major field: Entomology Plant-Insect Interactions TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................... iii VITA.................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................... x CHAPTER PAGE I. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 II. Feeding by elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Muller), on Ulmus pumila L. leaf discs treated with polar or nonpolar leaf extracts made from U. carpinifolia ’Christine Buisman’ or U. wilsoniana ’Prospector’ ....................................................................................................... 25 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 25 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................... 26 Results .............................................................................................................. 28 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 31 m . Feeding responses of elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Muller), to artificial substrates treated with extracts made from resistant and susceptible elms ............................................................................................... 40 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 40 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................... 41 Results .............................................................................................................. 45 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 47 v IV. Feeding behavior of elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Muller), in response to extracts made from susceptible, Ulmus pumila, and resistant, U. wilsoniana, elms ..................................................................... 60 Introduction ................................................................................................... 60 Materials and M ethods ................................................................................. 61 Results ........................................................................................................... 67 Discussion...................................................................................................... 72 V. Feeding response of elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Muller), to fractions obtained from the hexane-soluble fraction of a 95% ethanol Ulmus pumila L. leaf powder extract .......................................................... 94 Introduction ................................................................................................... 94 Materials and Methods ................................................................................. 96 Results........................................................................................ 101 Discussion .................................................................................................... 105 VI. Feeding response of elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Muller), to fractions obtained from the hexane-soluble fraction of a 95% ethanol Ulmus wilsoniana Schneid. ’Prospector’ leaf powder extract ................. 126 Introduction ................................................................................................. 126 Materials and Methods ................................................................................ 127 Results.......................................................................................................... 131 Discussion .................................................................................................... 132 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 141 LIST OF REFERENCES ........................................................................................... 145 APPENDIX ................................................................................................................ 154 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Mean leaf area consumed (mm2) by X. luteola exposed to U. pumila leaf discs treated with polar or nonpolar extracts of U. carpinifolia 'Christine Buisman’ or U. wilsoniana 'Prospector' ........................................................35 2. Mean leaf area consumed (mm2) by X. luteola exposed to U. pumila leaf discs treated with water: methanol (1:1) extracts of V. carpinifolia 'Christine Buisman* or U. wilsoniana 'Prospector' ....................................... 37 3. Mean leaf area consumed (mm2) by X. luteola exposed to U. pumila leaf discs treated with hexane:dichloromethane (1:1) extracts of U. carpinifolia 'Christine Buisman’ or U. wilsoniana 'Prospector' .............39 4. Mean number of female elm leaf beetles (±SE) showing a feeding response to Kaydry® paper treated with 8 different extracts of U. pumila and U. wilsoniana leaves, and mean number of eggs (±SE) laid on the paper in association with the extracts
Recommended publications
  • Heybroek HM, 2015
    Commentary - doi: 10.3832/ifor1244-008 ©iForest – Biogeosciences and Forestry Collection: 3rd International Elm Conference, Florence (Italy - 2013) more or less comparable to U. glabra. A wi- “The elms after 100 years of Dutch Elm disease” der range of genotypes of that species from Guest Editors: A. Santini, L. Ghelardini, E. Collin, A. Solla, J. Brunet, M. Faccoli, A. Scala, the colder valleys of the Himalaya seemed S. De Vries, J. Buiteveld desirable. So, after extensive preparations, I found myself in beautiful Kashmir, in the foothills The elm, tree of milk and wine of the Himalaya, in August 1960. The valley of Kashmir, with its large lakes, lies at some 1600 m a.s.l.; as U. wallichiana occurs (1-2) Hans M Heybroek roughly at altitudes of between 1800 and 3000 m, we had to ascend into the surroun- ding hills. The Indian Forest Service, and the Elm has played an important role in European culture for thousands of years, Botanical Survey of India provided liberal in many roles, with regional variation. In material culture, its wood has assis- assistance. Soon, in a mixed coniferous fo- ted in hunting and warfare for over seven thousand years; but more impor- rest that looked like our alpine forests, we tantly, its leaves and bark were semi-indispensable for the production of milk found our first U. wallichiana. What a disap- and meat, and served as an emergency food for humans. In the Mediterranean, pointment! It was a crooked stump, with elm was the main tool for the production of a good quality wine by providing hardly any branches or twigs.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Elm Disease, Graphium Ulmi
    ~ .- . Bulletin 389 October, 1936 I DUTCH ELM DISEASE Graphium uhi G. P. CLINTONrn Fwmm A. MCCORYT~ Bulletin 389 October, 1936 DUTCH ELM DISEASE Graphium ulmi ..,....... ..,...... .... d.-.. Y'." c:::: d.... c.... m... DUTCH ELM DISEASE Graphium ulmi Introduction HE DUTCHELM DISEASE is the common name of a trouble first described T from Holland in 1921, and nine years later identified in the United States. Early in its history this disease was found to be caused by a fungus new to science and called Graphium ulmi, ulmi being the generic name of the host upon which it occurred. Later it was discovered that this Graphium is only a stage in the life history of the fungus and that its mature stage is an Ascomycete of the genus Ceratostomella. Therefore tlie fungus is now usually called Ceraloslomella ulmi. More recently still the genus Ceratostomella has been divided, and the elm fungus has been placed by Nannfeldt (39) under the genus Ophiostoma, becoming Ophi- osloma ulmi. So we have at least three scientific names for the Dutch elm disease. As the imperfect stages of the fungus cause the injury to elm trees, in this laboratory we use the one name Graphium ulmi, rather than its saprophytic asco stage, though another imperfect stage, known usually as Cephalosporium, is associated with the tiraphium but is less distinct in its fruiting structure. The Dutch elm disease was fitfound in this country in Ohio in 1930. After several preliminary searches it was discovered in Connecticut a few years later. Because of the seriousness of the disease and the importance of the elm as a shade tree, the Station began to study the fungus and to co6perate wi1.h tlie United States Department of Agricnltnre in its control.
    [Show full text]
  • Reader 19 05 19 V75 Timeline Pagination
    Plant Trivia TimeLine A Chronology of Plants and People The TimeLine presents world history from a botanical viewpoint. It includes brief stories of plant discovery and use that describe the roles of plants and plant science in human civilization. The Time- Line also provides you as an individual the opportunity to reflect on how the history of human interaction with the plant world has shaped and impacted your own life and heritage. Information included comes from secondary sources and compila- tions, which are cited. The author continues to chart events for the TimeLine and appreciates your critique of the many entries as well as suggestions for additions and improvements to the topics cov- ered. Send comments to planted[at]huntington.org 345 Million. This time marks the beginning of the Mississippian period. Together with the Pennsylvanian which followed (through to 225 million years BP), the two periods consti- BP tute the age of coal - often called the Carboniferous. 136 Million. With deposits from the Cretaceous period we see the first evidence of flower- 5-15 Billion+ 6 December. Carbon (the basis of organic life), oxygen, and other elements ing plants. (Bold, Alexopoulos, & Delevoryas, 1980) were created from hydrogen and helium in the fury of burning supernovae. Having arisen when the stars were formed, the elements of which life is built, and thus we ourselves, 49 Million. The Azolla Event (AE). Hypothetically, Earth experienced a melting of Arctic might be thought of as stardust. (Dauber & Muller, 1996) ice and consequent formation of a layered freshwater ocean which supported massive prolif- eration of the fern Azolla.
    [Show full text]
  • Onderzoekers Van Het Eerste Uur Had- Den Veel Uithoudingsvermogen En Inventiviteit” Terugkijkend Op Een Kleine Eeuw Iepziekte En Iepenveredeling
    “Onderzoekers van het eerste uur had- den veel uithoudingsvermogen en inventiviteit” Terugkijkend op een kleine eeuw iepziekte en iepenveredeling Dr. Marie Ledeboer (links), the Dutch National Fungus Culture Collection with Prof. Dr. Westerdijk (midden) en Dr. Harmanna Diddens (rechts). De foto is genomen in 1933. Bron: “Dutch Elm Disease – The Early Papers”, auteurs F.W. Holms en H.M. Heybroek. APS Press, The American Phytopathological Society © 1990 De iep is ongetwijfeld de meest onderzochte boomsoort in de afgelopen eeuw. Talloze publicaties zijn er over te vinden en het comfortabele is dat voor het lezen hiervan kennis van vreemde talen eigenlijk niet nodig is, omdat juist Nederlandse wetenschappers baanbrekend werk hebben verricht inzake het ontwikkelen van steeds resistentere iepenklonen. Een enorme klus die begon in 1920 in Baarn en Wageningen. Auteur: Ronnie Nijboer Als oud Frederiksoorder leerde ik midden jaren terug vinden op schilderijen van beroemde mees- hét prototype van de boom die we ons wensen tachtig van plantenkennis-leraar Theo Janson dat ters. Later begonnen kwekers met enten en in het vlakke polderland. iepen met terughoudendheid geplant dienden te afleggen van bepaalde selecties. De bekendste is Heerlijk zijn de oude zwart-wit foto’s van lange worden, vanwege de iepziekte. Ook later, toen ik ongetwijfeld de ‘Belgica’. Deze kloon groeide snel lanen iepen slingerend door sappige weiden met de Ulmus ‘New Horizon’ bij groenbeheerders tot een hoge en brede iep, eigenlijk nog steeds aan de horizon het spitse torentje van de dorps- onder de aandacht bracht, ontmoette ik veel scepsis: “Ach ja hoor, daar is weer een kweker die beweert een resistente iep te hebben.
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Hybridisation and Interaction with Cultivars Affect the Genetic Variation of Ulmus Minor and Ulmus Glabra in Flanders K
    Interspecific hybridisation and interaction with cultivars affect the genetic variation of Ulmus minor and Ulmus glabra in Flanders K. Cox, A. Vanden Broeck, K. Vander Mijnsbrugge, J. Buiteveld, E. Collin, H.M. Heybroek, J. Mergeay To cite this version: K. Cox, A. Vanden Broeck, K. Vander Mijnsbrugge, J. Buiteveld, E. Collin, et al.. Interspecific hy- bridisation and interaction with cultivars affect the genetic variation of Ulmus minor and Ulmus glabra in Flanders. Tree Genetics and Genomes, Springer Verlag, 2014, 10 (4), pp.813-826. 10.1007/s11295- 014-0722-4. hal-02499791 HAL Id: hal-02499791 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02499791 Submitted on 5 Mar 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Author-produced version of the article published in: Tree genetics and genomes, 2014,vol 10, n°4, p. 813-826 The original publication is available at: http://link.springer.com/ or at http://link.live.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11295-014-0722-4 DOI 10.1007/s11295-014-0722-4 1 Interspecific hybridisation and interaction with cultivars affect the genetic variation of 2 Ulmus minor and U. glabra in Flanders 3 Karen Cox1, An Vanden Broeck1, Kristine Vander Mijnsbrugge1, Joukje Buiteveld², Eric Collin³, Hans 4 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on Dutch Elm Disease in Europe
    Forestry Commission ARCHIVE Cover Summary of the known positions of the Eurasian (EAN) and North American (NAN) races of the aggressive strain of Ceratocystis ulmi in Europe in 1981. Green, EAN race; red, NAN race. Based on identifications of the fungus in artificial culture from isolations made from over one thousand samples collected by Dr. C. M. Brasier (see pp. 96-104). The distribution of the non-aggressive strain of C. ulm iis not shown. FORESTRY COMMISSION BULLETIN No. 60 Research on Dutch elm disease in Europe PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY RESEARCH SEMINAR, GUERNSEY, CHANNEL ISLANDS, 30th MARCH — 1st APRIL 1982 Edited by D. A. BURDEKIN, B.A., Dip. Ag. Sci., Chief Research Officer, Forestry Commission, Forest Research Station, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 4LH, U.K. LONDON : HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE © Crown copyright 1983 First published 1983 ISBN 0 11 710153 2 Contents ruge INTRODUCTION D. A. Burdekin V DUTCH ELM DISEASE CONTROL 1. Dutch elm disease control campaign in Guernsey, G. F. Riley 1 Channel Islands, 1976-1981 2. Dutch elm disease control campaign in Jersey, G. Journeaux 5 Channel Islands, 1974-1982 3. Control of Dutch elm disease in Britain B. J. W. Greig and J. N. Gibbs 10 4. Dutch elm disease control in the Netherlands J. K. Water 17 5. Dutch elm disease in Denmark A. Yde-Andersen 19 6. Evaluation of the trap tree technique for the control D. P. O’Callaghan and 23 of Dutch elm disease in northwest England C. P. Fairhurst ENTOMOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF DUTCH ELM DISEASE 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Vier 'Resistente Iepen'-Generaties Op Een
    Vier ‘resistente iepen’-generaties op een rij De geschiedenis van de zoektocht naar een iepenziekte-oplossing In de opsomming van wetenschappelijke wapenfeiten over de schimmel die de iepenziekte veroorzaakt, speelt Nederland een grote rol. De waarschijnlijk uit Oost-Azië overgekomen boomziekte liet zich in 1918 voor het eerst zien in Noord-Brabant en Noord-Frankrijk. Al vanaf 1920 verrichtten de Nederlandse wetenschappers Johanna Westerdijk en haar onderzoekers Bea Schwarz en Christine Buisman baanbrekend werk, vandaar de naam Dutch elm disease. Ook nadat de iepenziekte zich in een agressievere vorm manifesteerde in de jaren zeventig, speelde het Nederlandse iepenveredelingsproject onder leiding van Hans Heybroek een cruciale rol in het voortbestaan van de iep, door het selecteren van aardig wat iepenklonen die steeds meer resistentie vertoonden. Auteur: Ronnie Nijboer www.boomzorg.nl 29 Special Bomenmonitor Ronnie Nijboer verdiepte zich enkele jaren gele- internationale contacten aan en wist vanuit de uitgegeven, een ‘tweede generatie’-iep, met den in de geschiedenis van het iepziekteonder- hele wereld iepenmateriaal te bemachtigen. De ‘Vegeta’ als moeder en een Franse zaailing als zoek en schreef daarover een artikel (Boomzorg Plantenziektekundige Dienst en Staatsbosbeheer vader. De ‘Commelin’ was iets resistenter tegen juni 2010). Gezien de recente ontwikkelingen op wierpen zich op voor het verwijderen van zieke de oude iepenziekteschimmel dan de ‘Vegeta’, iepengebied is het tijd voor een update. iepen, gesteund door het Koninklijk Besluit van een verschil dat na 1970 bij de agressievere nieu- 28 april 1930, waarin was vastgelegd dat dode of we schimmel wegviel. Hoewel De Dorschkamp In 1920 ontdekte promovenda Bea Schwarz zieke iepen moesten worden geruimd.
    [Show full text]
  • Het Geslacht Ulmus - Nieuwe Mogelijkheden
    Het geslacht Ulmus - nieuwe mogelijkheden L. Goudzwaard Iepen behoren tot sterkste bomen voor stede- lijke omstandigheden en open landschappen. Door de iepenziekte is het Iepenbestand in Nederland flink achteruitgegaan. De vorige beschrijving van Ulmus in Dendroflora 5 (1968) verscheen nog voor de verspreiding van de tweede iepenziekte-schimmel in Euro- pa en ook voor de uitgave van alle nieuwe hoogresistente selecties. Sindsdien zijn de inzichten in naamgeving en de beschikbare cultivars sterk veranderd. Het iepensortiment is constant in beweging; tijd voor een update in Dendroflora. In dit artikel de voor Nederland belangrijke soorten en cultivars. De volgorde is per werelddeel: Europa, Amerika en Azië. Daarna volgen de complexe hybriden.fraaie hopbellen. Iepen behoren tot de oudste gecultiveerde bomen tiende eeuw in rijen langs akkers voor houtpro- op aarde. De Engelse iep, U. procera ‘Atinia’, ductie. In die eeuwen waren iepen in omloop werd vanaf 1550 in meidoornhagen geplant en met namen als “rode iep”, “witte iep” en “steen- heeft het Engelse landschap eeuwenlang gedo- olm”, geselecteerd naar de houteigenschappen, mineerd (Heybroek et al, 2009) . Deze iepenkloon is al en “vette olm”, naar de snelle groei. Pas vanaf beschreven door Columella omstreeks 50 na ca. 1750 werden aan sommige iepenklonen Chr. Er zijn zelfs aanwijzingen dat hij al door Latijnse namen toegekend (Heybroek et al, 2009) . Er de Grieken was geselecteerd voor ondersteuning verschenen meer gekweekte vormen met afwij- van wijnranken en voor veevoer en in Frankrijk kende bladkleur, kroonvorm en groei. Een chaos werd ingevoerd omstreeks 600 v Chr. Iepen zijn aan namen en synoniemen ontstond doordat er belangrijke heilige bomen in de Himalaya en geen eenduidigheid was in het onderscheiden waren dat ook in Noordwest Europa.
    [Show full text]
  • Elm-Breeding in the Netherlands
    Elm-breeding in the Netherlands By H. M. HEYBROEK Phytopath. Laboratory "Willie Commelin Scholten", Baarn, Holland (Received for publication February 1, 1957) 1. Background andhistor y Native elms in the Netherlands are Ulmus glabra HUDS., some form(s) of U. carpinifolia GLED., and possibly U. laevis PALL. The first one is found in a few forest-associations in the ex­ treme south and east of the country. The second one occurs in several forest-types, but mainly in theUlmetum suberosae, which covers only about 50 ha on rich sandy soils along the large rivers and along the dunes. The major part of this vegetation is coppice, only about 5 ha bear high forest (comm. H. DOING KRAFT). U. laevis is a rare tree in the Netherlands and so none of thenativ e species is of much econo­ mic value. However, elms were extensively planted in Holland and even so the clones used didno t belong to a wild species. The vast majority of the trees, more than 99%, belonged to one Fig. 1.— U.holland:' • ' ••'„ ••• . "i-j toad in the province of Friesland. clone, X U.hollandica MILL, belgica (BURGSD.) Note that the trees have grown sideways owing to the force of the wind. R., a hybrid between U. glabra HUDS. and U. carpinifolia GLED., being a product of selection by nur­ serymen in earlier centuries. (In Holland, the clone is is called "Hollandse iep", i. e. "Dutch elm"; in other countries, "Dutch elm" is X U. hollandica MILL, major (SM.) R.fro m which up till now nomor e than onetre eha s been found in Holland.) Here andthere , too, the Hunting­ don elm X U.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding and Scientific Advances in the Fight Against Dutch Elm Disease: Will They Allow the Use of Elms in Forest Restoration? Juan A
    Breeding and scientific advances in the fight against Dutch elm disease: Will they allow the use of elms in forest restoration? Juan A. Martín · Juan Sobrino‑Plata · Jesús Rodríguez‑Calcerrada · Carmen Collada · Luis Gil Abstract Elms (Ulmus spp.) were once dominant trees in mixed broadleaf forests of many European territories, mainly distributed near rivers and streams or on foodplains. Since ancient times they have provided important services to humans, and several selected genotypes have been massively propagated and planted. Today elm populations are severely degraded due to the negative impact of human-induced changes in riparian ecosystems and the emergence of the highly aggressive Dutch elm disease pathogens. Despite the death of most large elm specimens, there is no evidence of genetic diversity loss in elm populations, probably due to their ability to resprout after disease. The recovery of elm populations from the remaining diversity should build from genomic tools that facilitate achievement of resistant elm clones. Research works to date have discerned the genetic diversity of elms and are well on the way to deciphering the genetic clues of elm resistance and pathogen virulence, key fndings for addressing recovery of elm populations. Several tolerant clones suitable for use in urban and landscape planting have been obtained through traditional species hybridization with Asian elms, and various native clones have been selected and used in pilot forest restoration projects. Successful reintroduction of elms should also rely on a deeper understanding of elm ecology, in particular their resilience to abiotic and biotic disturbances. However, all these eforts would be in vain without the fnal acceptance of elm reintroduction by the social actors involved, making it necessary to evaluate and publi- cize the ecosystem services elms can provide for today’s society.
    [Show full text]
  • Johanna Westerdijk (1881–1961) – the Impact of the Grand Lady of Phytopathology in the Netherlands from 1917 to 2017
    Eur J Plant Pathol (2019) 154:11–16 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-019-01670-w Johanna Westerdijk (1881–1961) – the impact of the grand lady of phytopathology in the Netherlands from 1917 to 2017 Piet M. Boonekamp & Corné M. J. Pieterse & Francine Govers & Ben J. C. Cornelissen Accepted: 6 January 2019 /Published online: 8 February 2019 # Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2019 Abstract One century ago, on February 10, 1917, improved yields and without toxic compounds were Johanna Westerdijk delivered her inaugural speech at selected for human consumption. Because the selected Utrecht University entitled “New directions in phytopath- crops were grown in monoculture, these agricultural ological research”. By doing so, she became the very first systems were particularly prone to infections by plant female professor in the Netherlands and set the stage for pathogens. From the earliest written sources in history to many female professors who followed her example. Be- reports in the mid-nineteenth century, crop yield losses sides her remarkable performance as a role model for and famines caused by plant diseases were reported in women in science, Johanna Westerdijk was also a pioneer all regions in the world, without knowing the nature of in the global science field of phytopathology, which rap- their causal agents (Zadoks 2013). idly emerged at the end of the 19th century and reached In the 2nd half of the nineteenth century the first plant maturity during the course of her scientific career. diseases were recognized as being caused by alien organ- isms (Kühn 1858). Various organisms were found as caus- The start of phytopathology ative agents of plant diseases and Phytopathology as sci- entific discipline was born.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding and Restoring the Next Generation American Elm
    Second Wednesdays | 1:00 – 2:15 pm ET www.fs.fed.us/research/urban-webinars USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Carrie Pike Leila Pinchot Charlie Flower Regeneration Specialist Research Ecologist Research Ecologist USDA Forest Service USDA Forest Service USDA Forest Service [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Breeding and restoring the next generation American Elm Cornelia (Leila) Pinchot, Charles Flower, Kathleen Knight, James Slavicek Outline • Background: • American elm ecological and cultural value • Dutch elm disease and its impacts • Historical efforts to restore the species • USFS NRS efforts to restore American elm • Develop DED-tolerant populations • Develop strategies for reintroducing elm to wildland and urban environments • Highlight two studies American Elm (Ulmus americana) U.S. Geological Survey. 1999. Digital representation of E.L. Little 1971 "Atlas of United States Trees" Elm sphinx moth, Ceratomia amyntor From Tallemy and Shropshire, 2009, Conservation Biology 23(4):941-947. Double-toothed prominent moth, Nerice bidentata Wildlife that utilize American elm North American porcupine American wood duck Yellow-rumped warbler Purple finch Ruffed grouse Northern bobwhite Gray squirrel “Universal element of the American urban landscape” “If the American dream had a home, it would be tucked beneath the sunshot canopy of elm street, USA.” -Thomas Campanella, “Republic of Shade” Elms at the University of Illinois, from “Dutch elm disease in Illinois”, by J.C. Carter Field elms in the Connecticut Valley – Albert Bierstadt, 1862 Elm in the New York Times NYT Feb 13, 1902 NYT April 21, 1931 NYT May 20, 1941 Dutch elm disease (DED) Caused by Ophiostoma ulmi and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi Xylem discoloration caused by DED NYT Sept 30, 1956 Scanning electron micrographs of mycelial growth of O.
    [Show full text]