Protestant Exiles from France in the Reign of Louis XIV; Or, the Huguenot Refugees & Their Descendants in Great Britain &
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
«*Wi E] |ruiJiTin]fiirO[fin][rifO[]iJi]pi]Jju^ i THE LIBRARIES I I 1 I COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 1 1 1 1 * 1 I 1 I i 1 General Library s 1 1 El pnJ rm] riJT] rin^ i^lrnJ[fni]n^|E" [ f | PROTESTANT EXILES FROM FRANCE. PROTESTANT EXILES FROM FRANCE IN THE REIGN OF LOUIS XIV. OR, THE HUGUENOT REFUGEES AND THEIR DESCENDANTS IN GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND. THE REV. DAVID C. A. AG NEW. Index-Volume, with Also, Analyses, Introductory Memoirs Alphabetical Tables, OF Refugees AND Notes. IN Former Reigns. LONDON: REEVES & TURNER. EDINBURGH: WILLIAM PATERSON. 1874. v3 PREFACE, In order that the two volumes on " Protestant Exiles from France in the reign of Louis XIV.," may be serviceable to historical and genealogical students, it is necessary to provide this Index-Volume. The author takes the opportunity of introducing new memoirs, and illustrative documents and notes— especially memoirs of refugees in former reigns (fugitives from the Duke of Alva, the St Bartholomew Massacre, &c.), and their descendants. The surnames in volumes first and second are re-produced in a careful analysis of the whole work. Additional surnames, admitted in conformity with the plan of volume third, are incorporated in the Analysis, and the Alphabetical Tables refer to the pages in volume third. The original work has thus been zealously supplemented, annotated, and corrected, so that the possessors of volumes first and second have in this Index-Volume all the advantages of a new and improved edition, without the disadvantage of their former purchase becoming reduced in pecuniary value. It is impossible that the author can reprint the original work. For the sake of new purchasers, therefore, the third volume must be complete in itself. And, accordingly, some repetitions will be observed, which the possessors of volumes first and second are requested to excuse. A large number of the books and documents quoted in this work can be consulted in the library of the English Presbyterian College, Queen Square House, Guildford Street, London. i 'v GENERAL VIEW OF THE CONTENTS OF THE INDEX-VOLUME. Analysis of Historical Introduction to Memoirs of Refugees in the Reign oi Louis XIV., Memoirs of Refugees in former Reigns, Analysis of Volume First, Analysis of Volume Second, Additional Chapters, Alphabetical Tables, C0.V7£.VTS OF THE INDEX-VOLUME. ADDITIONS TO VOLUME FIRST. i38> 14S Notes, 132- 134, 140, 143. '44, ADDITIONS TO VOLUME SECOND. 190 Letter from a French Protestant, 12 th October 1686, . Memoirs OF CoLOMiis, MifiGE, AND De LA Heuze, . 164,168 Memoir of Dean Drelincourt, ...••• '95 Inventory OF the Marquise De Gouvernet, .... 199 . 205 Memoirs of Suzanne De L'Orme, Helena Lefevre, &c., . Marquis de la Musse, ..-••• 207 209 Rev. S. Lyon, Chatelain, &c., . • • • • • Sir Donald M-Leod, K.S.I., C.B., ..... 213 Will of Philip Delahaize, Esq., Proved 29th November 1769, . 217 226 Memoirs of Bishop Terrot and Rev. V. Perronet, . Sir Fr.\ncis Be.\ufort, K.C.B., F.R.S., ..... 229 A. Richard Chenevix, T. G. Fonnere.\u, Professor Rigaud, J. R. Planch^, H. Kenney, D.D., B. Langlois, M.P., .... 232 Notes, 152, 154, 155, 156, iS7. iS8> 163, 165, 167, 169, 170, 171, 172, 185, 1S7, 188, 190, 191, 192, 198, 199, 211, 213, 215, 216, 221, 223, 224, 228, 229, 231, 232, 238, 239 ADDITIONAL CHAPTERS. Chapter XXX. Refugees, being Converts from Romanism, .... 241 Bion, De Brevall, Chariot d'Argenteuil, Du Veil, Gagnier, De Luzancy, Malard, De la Pillonniere, Le Vassor, &c. Chapter XXXI. Descendants in Britain of Huguenots who were Refugees in other Countries, 246 Thellusson, Labouchcre, Prevost, Du Boulay, Fourdrinier, Maty, Aubertin, &c. Chapter XXXII. Additional Facts and Notes, 252 ALPHABETICAL TABLES. 261 Rffucees of earliest Dates, and their Descendants, . I 262 Louis XIV., and their Descendants, II. Refugees during the Reign of ' 269 • • • Naturalizations, &c., • • III. 281 IV. Miscellaneous Names, •••• — ANALNSIS OF X'OLUMLi riRST Willi XOTF.S AND DOCUMENTS. !^t0tortcal ^ntroDuction. CONSISTING OFTEN SECTIONS (Vol. I., pages I tO 8l). Section I., (pages i to 8). The Persecution which drove the Protestants from France and its causes. I need give no summary of the historical statements down to the date of the mass.acre of the Huguenots (or French Protestants) by the Romanists, by order of King Charles IX., on St liartholomew's day 1572. But I insert an abridgement of the remainder of Section I. In order to understand the justification of civil war in France at tliis period, we must con- sider sonie points of ditference from our views of law and loyalty, belonging to the very constitutions of ancient government as comiiared with more modern monarchy and executive authority. After considering that the St Bartholomew massacre made personal self defence a Huguenot's only protection, the reader must picture a French Protestant congregation, forbidden to carry any arms, yet surrounded by Roman Catholics, armed with weapons which a raging priesthood stirs them up to use against the unarmed worshippers, the law not visiting such murderous assaults with any punishment. It must also be realised that it was consistent with loyalty for a noble to have a fortress over which the king had no active jurisdiction, and for a town such as La Rochelle to be equally independent of the sovereign. Such a town, by feudal right, was as effectual a sanctuary against the king's emissaries as any ecclesiastical building. It was as lawless for the king to go to war with the town, as for the town to send an invading army against Paris. The independent rulers of a fort or walled town had some duties to their own dependents, to which e\en the king's claims must be post- poned. The supreme authority of a king over all towns and castles was a state of things svhich in theory the King of France might wish : but it was not the constitution of France ; and therefore such coveting was a species of radicalism on his part. The inhabitants of La Rochelle owed to their independence their escape from the St. Bar- tholomew massacre. The Queen of Navarre, though decoyed to Paris, escaped by the visita- tion of God, who removed her " from the evil to come," and to the heavenly country, about two months before. A very great Huguenot soldier, second to none but Coligny, survived the massacre, namely, Francois, Seigneur de la Noue. This " Francis with the Iron Arm" had been Governor of La Rochelle. He was at Mons at the date of the massacre, but was spared, and graciously received by the king. Assuming that he would recant in return for his life, the Court sent him to La Rochelle to see if the citizens, on their liberty of conscience being promised, would surrender to royal authority. La Noue, as an envoy, was coldly re- ceived. Finding the citizens firm and courageous, he again accepted the cliief command in the Protestant interest, and the Royalist besiegers withdrew in the summer of 1573. An edict, dated nth .August 1573, conceded to the Huguenots liberty of domestic worship and the public exercise of their religion in La Rochelle, Montauban, and Nismes. The A 2 FREXCH PROTESTANr EXILES. Government relieved its feelings of chagrin at such concessions by inventing, as the one legal designation of French Protestantism for all time coming, the contemptuous title, " La Religion Pretendiie Reformee " (the pretended reformed religion), or " La R.P.R." Henry IIL succeeded Charles IX. in 1574, but his reign must here be passed over. When he was assassinated in the camp near Paris in 1589, the Protestants under King Henry of Navarre were in his army, taking the loyal side against the rebellious Roman Catholic League. The Papists continued the rebellion, with a view to displace Henry of Navarre from the throne of France, which was his rightful inheritance; and thus the Protestants, being evidently loyal still, require no apologist. It is alleged, however, that by now becoming a party to a treaty with the king of the country, the Protestant Church of France assumed an imijerial position which no civilised empire can tolerate, and that, therefore, the suppression of that Church by Louis XIV., though executed with indefensible cruelty, was the dictate of political necessity. The reply to this allegation is, that this treaty was only the re-enactment and further extension of a peculiar method of tolerating Protestants, devised by the kings of France as the only plan to evade the necessity of being intolerant, which the coronation oath made them swear to be. The plea that Protestants, as religionists, were not implicitly subject to the King, but were to be negotiated with like a foreign power, was the only apology for tolerating them, consistent even with the modified oath sworn by Henry IV. — " I will endeavour, to the utmost of my power, and in good faith, to drive out of my jurisdiction and from the lands under my sway all heretics denounced by the Church" of Rome. As to this political treaty with the Huguenots in its first shape. Professor Anderson* remarks, " Instead of religious toleration being secured to them by a powerfully administered law, their protection was left in their own hands, . as if there was something in their creed which must for ever render them incapable of amalgamating with other Frenchmen." Royalty, which planned the treaty, was at least as guilty as the Protestant Church, which entered into the plan. If persecution and extinction were the righteous wages of the transaction, the humbler accomplice was not the only party that had earned them. The only crime was consent to a royal programme, to which the successors of Henri IV.